Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category	Ward 50
Hispanic	17.8% ±3.3 pp10,378 ±1,931
White	44.9% ±3.7 pp26,150 ±2,177
Black	9.4% ±1.5 pp5,454 ±854
Asian	21.2% ±3.0 pp12,366 ±1,739
Other or Multi-racial	6.7% ±1.6 pp3,903 ±946
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Hispanic	17.8%±3.3 pp10,378±1,931	29.7%±0.2 pp805,318±5,785	▼ -11.9%	28/50
White	44.9%±3.7 pp26,150±2,177	32.1%±0.2 pp870,127±5,557	▲ +12.8%	17/50
Black	9.4%±1.5 pp5,454±854	27.4%±0.2 pp743,710±6,047	▼ -18.1%	24/50
Asian	21.2%±3.0 pp12,366±1,739	7.2%±0.2 pp196,435±4,370	▲ +14.0%	3/50
Other or Multi-racial	6.7%±1.6 pp3,903±946	3.5%±0.1 pp95,636±3,778	▲ +3.2%	1/50
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Hispanic	16.3% ±2.7 pp8,811 ±1,449	17.8% ±2.4 pp10,197 ±1,378	17.8% ±3.3 pp10,378 ±1,931	▲ +1.5 pp▲ +1,567▲ +0.1 pp▲ +181▲ +1.4 pp▲ +1,386
Chicago citywide	28.9% ±0.2 pp785,292 ±4,750	28.8% ±0.2 pp780,167 ±5,832	29.7% ±0.2 pp805,318 ±5,785	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +20,026▲ +0.9 pp▲ +25,151▼ −0.2 pp▼ −5,125
White	48.6% ±2.3 pp26,273 ±1,247	44.3% ±2.0 pp25,420 ±1,132	44.9% ±3.7 pp26,150 ±2,177	▼ −3.7 pp▼ −123▲ +0.6 pp▲ +730▼ −4.4 pp▼ −853
Chicago citywide	32.2% ±0.2 pp872,513 ±4,319	33.3% ±0.2 pp901,769 ±4,468	32.1% ±0.2 pp870,127 ±5,557	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2,386▼ −1.2 pp▼ −31,642▲ +1.1 pp▲ +29,256
Black	8.2% ±1.6 pp4,407 ±855	10.0% ±1.7 pp5,762 ±989	9.4% ±1.5 pp5,454 ±854	▲ +1.2 pp▲ +1,047▼ −0.7 pp▼ −308▲ +1.9 pp▲ +1,355
Chicago citywide	31.5% ±0.1 pp853,214 ±3,755	29.2% ±0.2 pp790,893 ±4,690	27.4% ±0.2 pp743,710 ±6,047	▼ −4.0 pp▼ −109,504▼ −1.8 pp▼ −47,183▼ −2.3 pp▼ −62,321
Asian	23.8% ±2.6 pp12,831 ±1,421	23.4% ±2.8 pp13,466 ±1,616	21.2% ±3.0 pp12,366 ±1,739	▼ −2.5 pp▼ −465▼ −2.2 pp▼ −1,100▼ −0.3 pp▲ +635
Chicago citywide	5.7% ±0.1 pp154,287 ±2,942	6.5% ±0.1 pp177,195 ±3,532	7.2% ±0.2 pp196,435 ±4,370	▲ +1.6 pp▲ +42,148▲ +0.7 pp▲ +19,240▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,908
Other or Multi-racial	3.1% ±1.0 pp1,696 ±517	4.5% ±1.2 pp2,595 ±666	6.7% ±1.6 pp3,903 ±946	▲ +3.6 pp▲ +2,207▲ +2.2 pp▲ +1,308▲ +1.4 pp▲ +899
Chicago citywide	1.7% ±0.1 pp47,302 ±1,990	2.2% ±0.1 pp59,510 ±2,584	3.5% ±0.1 pp95,636 ±3,778	▲ +1.8 pp▲ +48,334▲ +1.3 pp▲ +36,126▲ +0.5 pp▲ +12,208

Age Distribution

Category	Ward 50
Under 5	6.9% ±1.0 pp4,041 ±574
5-17	23.8% ±1.5 pp13,872 ±883
18-24	7.4% ±1.0 pp4,326 ±590
25-44	24.2% ±1.2 pp14,078 ±726
45-64	22.8% ±1.5 pp13,255 ±895
65-74	9.2% ±0.7 pp5,374 ±437
75-84	4.1% ±0.6 pp2,404 ±359
85+	1.5% ±0.3 pp901 ±202
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Under 5	6.9%±1.0 pp4,041±574	5.3%±0.1 pp144,044±3,726	▲ +1.6%	4/50
5-17	23.8%±1.5 pp13,872±883	14.1%±0.2 pp381,582±5,292	▲ +9.7%	1/50
18-24	7.4%±1.0 pp4,326±590	9.6%±0.2 pp260,942±4,703	▼ -2.2%	41/50
25-44	24.2%±1.2 pp14,078±726	34.3%±0.2 pp929,946±6,124	▼ -10.1%	49/50
45-64	22.8%±1.5 pp13,255±895	22.9%±0.2 pp620,047±5,184	▼ -0.1%	29/50
65-74	9.2%±0.7 pp5,374±437	8.2%±0.1 pp221,932±3,538	▲ +1.0%	18/50
75-84	4.1%±0.6 pp2,404±359	4.0%±0.1 pp107,625±2,624	▲ +0.2%	25/50
85+	1.5%±0.3 pp901±202	1.7%±0.1 pp45,108±1,900	▼ -0.1%	28/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category	Ward 50
No High School Diploma	14.0% ±2.0 pp5,024 ±727
High School Diploma or GED	17.9% ±1.8 pp6,452 ±665
Some College or Associate's Degree	22.1% ±2.1 pp7,932 ±761
Bachelor's Degree	26.7% ±3.5 pp9,608 ±1,249
Graduate Degree	19.3% ±1.6 pp6,950 ±573
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
No High School Diploma	14.0%±2.0 pp5,024±727	12.8%±0.2 pp246,015±4,665	▲ +1.2%	23/50
High School Diploma or GED	17.9%±1.8 pp6,452±665	21.1%±0.3 pp405,248±5,594	▼ -3.1%	34/50
Some College or Associate's Degree	22.1%±2.1 pp7,932±761	21.8%±0.3 pp419,911±5,261	▲ +0.2%	23/50
Bachelor's Degree	26.7%±3.5 pp9,608±1,249	25.4%±0.3 pp488,467±5,561	▲ +1.3%	21/50
Graduate Degree	19.3%±1.6 pp6,950±573	19.0%±0.3 pp365,017±4,874	▲ +0.4%	19/50
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category	Ward 50
Total Population	58,252 ±3,854
Total Households	18,896 ±955
Population Density	21,813 ±1,443 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	Average Ward	Difference
Total Population	58,252	54,206	▲ +4,046
Total Households	18,896	23,200	▼ −4,304
Population Density	21,813 people/sq mi	16,281 people/sq mi	▲ +5,532
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average ward rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large wards. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19	Difference	Rank
Total Population	54,017 ±2,468	57,440 ±2,479	58,252 ±3,854	▲ +4,235 ±4,577▲ +812 ±4,583▲ +3,423 ±3,499	▼ −213▲ +3,274▲ +4,046	29/5013/505/50
Average Ward	54,230	54,166	54,206	▼ −24▲ +40▼ −64
Total Households	17,234 ±525	17,974 ±543	18,896 ±955	▲ +1,662 ±1,090▲ +922 ±1,098▲ +740 ±755	▼ −3,334▼ −3,346▼ −4,304	41/5041/5040/50
Average Ward	20,568	21,320	23,200	▲ +2,631▲ +1,880▲ +751
Population Density (per sq mi)	20,227 ±924	21,509 ±928	21,813 ±1,443	▲ +1,586▲ +304▲ +1,282	▲ +4,311▲ +5,397▲ +5,532	14/5012/5011/50
Average Ward Density	15,916	16,112	16,281	▲ +366▲ +169▲ +196

Household Size

Category	Ward 50
Average Household Size	3.03±0.20
1-Person Households	24.9% ±2.8 pp4,696 ±525
2-Person Households	27.5% ±2.9 pp5,190 ±545
3-Person Households	13.3% ±2.0 pp2,520 ±381
4+ Person Households	34.3% ±3.5 pp6,490 ±654
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Size	3.03±0.20	2.29±0.02	▲ +0.74	5/50
1-Person Households	24.9%±2.8 pp4,696±525	39.7%±0.4 pp460,268±4,301	▼ -14.8%	46/50
2-Person Households	27.5%±2.9 pp5,190±545	29.5%±0.4 pp342,235±4,195	▼ -2.0%	32/50
3-Person Households	13.3%±2.0 pp2,520±381	12.9%±0.3 pp149,291±3,231	▲ +0.5%	33/50
4+ Person Households	34.3%±3.5 pp6,490±654	18.0%±0.3 pp208,411±4,023	▲ +16.4%	6/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category	Ward 50
Never Married	38.5% ±2.4 pp16,879 ±1,062
Married	47.3% ±4.2 pp20,745 ±1,820
Separated	2.5% ±0.9 pp1,076 ±394
Divorced	7.2% ±1.2 pp3,175 ±504
Widowed	4.4% ±0.8 pp1,939 ±367
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Never Married	38.5%±2.4 pp16,879±1,062	49.6%±0.3 pp1,130,286±6,623	▼ -11.1%	43/50
Married	47.3%±4.2 pp20,745±1,820	35.5%±0.3 pp807,294±6,077	▲ +11.9%	6/50
Separated	2.5%±0.9 pp1,076±394	2.2%±0.1 pp49,430±2,379	▲ +0.3%	21/50
Divorced	7.2%±1.2 pp3,175±504	7.9%±0.2 pp180,700±3,966	▼ -0.7%	30/50
Widowed	4.4%±0.8 pp1,939±367	4.8%±0.1 pp109,357±2,738	▼ -0.4%	27/50
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category	Ward 50
Speak English Only	48.0% ±2.4 pp25,970 ±1,311
Spanish	15.9% ±2.8 pp8,590 ±1,506
Other Indo-European	14.0% ±2.5 pp7,554 ±1,333
Other Languages	7.1% ±1.2 pp3,854 ±638
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic	5.3% ±3.0 pp2,874 ±1,626
Other Asian and Pacific Island	2.8% ±0.9 pp1,516 ±468
Vietnamese	2.0% ±0.8 pp1,067 ±414
Arabic	1.3% ±0.6 pp693 ±300
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese)	1.3% ±0.6 pp678 ±302
Korean	1.3% ±0.5 pp676 ±290
German or Other West Germanic	1.1% ±1.0 pp581 ±555
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this ward, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Speak English Only	48.0%±2.4 pp25,970±1,311	64.6%±0.3 pp1,659,069±8,218	▼ -16.6%	37/50
Spanish	15.9%±2.8 pp8,590±1,506	23.7%±0.2 pp607,865±6,166	▼ -7.8%	26/50
Other Indo-European	14.0%±2.5 pp7,554±1,333	2.4%±0.1 pp61,672±3,192	▲ +11.6%	1/27
Other Languages	7.1%±1.2 pp3,854±638	1.0%±0.1 pp25,292±2,452	▲ +6.1%	3/50
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic	5.3%±3.0 pp2,874±1,626	2.6%±0.1 pp67,932±3,529	▲ +2.7%	7/30
Other Asian and Pacific Island	2.8%±0.9 pp1,516±468	0.9%±0.1 pp22,472±2,251	▲ +1.9%	1/16
Vietnamese	2.0%±0.8 pp1,067±414	0.3%±0.1 pp7,123±1,340	▲ +1.7%	1/3
Arabic	1.3%±0.6 pp693±300	0.5%±0.1 pp13,601±1,716	▲ +0.8%	5/6
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese)	1.3%±0.6 pp678±302	2.0%±0.1 pp52,032±2,783	▼ -0.8%	17/20
Korean	1.3%±0.5 pp676±290	0.3%±0.0 pp8,044±1,187	▲ +0.9%	3/4
German or Other West Germanic	1.1%±1.0 pp581±555	0.2%±0.0 pp6,368±921	▲ +0.8%	2/2
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this ward, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 50
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	76.7% ±7.1 pp76.7%±7.1 pp41,603 ±3,843
Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents age 5+)	23.3% ±2.1 pp23.3%±2.1 pp12,608 ±1,124
↳ Speaks English Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	12.6% ±1.8 pp54.3%±5.8 pp6,851 ±955
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	7.3% ±1.2 pp31.3%±4.4 pp3,943 ±662
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	3.3% ±1.1 pp14.4%±4.4 pp1,814 ±577
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	76.7%±7.1 pp76.7%±7.1 pp41,603±3,843	85.4%±0.5 pp85.4%±0.5 pp2,192,778±11,961	▼ -8.7%▼ -8.7%	40/50
Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents age 5+)	23.3%±2.1 pp23.3%±2.1 pp12,608±1,124	14.6%±0.3 pp14.6%±0.3 pp374,404±6,794	▲ +8.7%▲ +8.7%	11/50
↳ Speaks English Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	12.6%±1.8 pp54.3%±5.8 pp6,851±955	7.1%±0.2 pp48.9%±0.9 pp183,252±4,686	▲ +5.5%▲ +5.4%	9/5020/50
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	7.3%±1.2 pp31.3%±4.4 pp3,943±662	5.2%±0.2 pp35.6%±0.8 pp133,269±3,923	▲ +2.1%▼ -4.3%	16/5033/50
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	3.3%±1.1 pp14.4%±4.4 pp1,814±577	2.3%±0.1 pp15.5%±0.7 pp57,883±2,982	▲ +1.1%▼ -1.1%	13/5027/50
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category	Ward 50
Married-Couple Households	47.8% ±3.3 pp9,037 ±618
Unmarried-Couple Households	7.3% ±2.1 pp1,389 ±390
One-Person Households	24.9% ±3.2 pp4,696 ±596
Other Household Types	20.0% ±7.5 pp3,774 ±1,426
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Married-Couple Households	47.8%±3.3 pp9,037±618	30.9%±0.3 pp358,432±3,598	▲ +16.9%	6/50
Unmarried-Couple Households	7.3%±2.1 pp1,389±390	8.3%±0.2 pp96,220±2,797	▼ -0.9%	28/50
One-Person Households	24.9%±3.2 pp4,696±596	39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,729	▼ -14.8%	46/50
Other Household Types	20.0%±7.5 pp3,774±1,426	21.1%±0.7 pp245,285±8,514	▼ -1.2%	28/50
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category	Ward 50
Children in Married-Couple Households	73.8% ±5.7 pp12,998 ±1,006
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	8.4% ±2.9 pp1,486 ±516
Children in Single-Mother Households	13.9% ±3.4 pp2,445 ±605
Children in Single-Father Households	3.9% ±1.9 pp695 ±332
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households	73.8%±5.7 pp12,998±1,006	56.0%±0.8 pp293,542±4,257	▲ +17.8%	14/50
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	8.4%±2.9 pp1,486±516	8.8%±0.6 pp45,960±3,208	▼ -0.3%	24/50
Children in Single-Mother Households	13.9%±3.4 pp2,445±605	30.6%±0.9 pp160,535±4,521	▼ -16.8%	43/50
Children in Single-Father Households	3.9%±1.9 pp695±332	4.6%±0.4 pp24,133±2,006	▼ -0.7%	27/50
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 50
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	1.7% ±0.6 pp1.7%±0.6 pp691 ±231
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	40.8% ±29.6 pp0.7%±0.5 pp282 ±204
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	0.0% ±12.2 pp0.0%0
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	20.6% ±15.9 pp0.4%±0.3 pp142 ±110
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	6.4% ±12.6 pp0.1%±0.2 pp44 ±87
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	32.3% ±19.0 pp0.6%±0.3 pp223 ±131
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	1.7%±0.6 pp1.7%±0.6 pp691±231	2.8%±0.1 pp2.8%±0.1 pp60,766±2,397	▼ -1.1%▼ -1.1%	43/50
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	40.8%±29.6 pp0.7%±0.5 pp282±204	26.8%±1.8 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,267±1,067	▲ +14.0%0%	11/5025/50
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	0.0%±12.2 pp0.0%0	12.9%±1.0 pp0.4%±0.0 pp7,830±579	▼ -12.9%▼ -0.4%	50/5050/50
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	20.6%±15.9 pp0.4%±0.3 pp142±110	28.8%±1.4 pp0.8%±0.0 pp17,525±846	▼ -8.2%▼ -0.4%	42/5044/50
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	6.4%±12.6 pp0.1%±0.2 pp44±87	4.9%±0.7 pp0.1%±0.0 pp2,995±441	▲ +1.4%0%	14/5023/50
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	32.3%±19.0 pp0.6%±0.3 pp223±131	26.6%±1.5 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,149±916	▲ +5.7%▼ -0.2%	12/5029/50
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 50
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	63.5% ±2.4 pp63.5%±2.4 pp36,987 ±1,411
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	36.5% ±2.4 pp36.5%±2.4 pp21,265 ±1,403
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	19.0% ±1.6 pp52.0%±2.6 pp11,052 ±913
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	17.5% ±2.3 pp48.0%±5.5 pp10,214 ±1,356
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	63.5%±2.4 pp63.5%±2.4 pp36,987±1,411	79.1%±0.3 pp79.1%±0.3 pp2,144,343±7,926	▼ -15.6%▼ -15.6%	45/50
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	36.5%±2.4 pp36.5%±2.4 pp21,265±1,403	20.9%±0.3 pp20.9%±0.3 pp566,883±7,968	▲ +15.6%▲ +15.6%	6/50
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	19.0%±1.6 pp52.0%±2.6 pp11,052±913	10.0%±0.2 pp47.7%±0.5 pp270,551±4,603	▲ +9.0%▲ +4.2%	5/5018/50
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	17.5%±2.3 pp48.0%±5.5 pp10,214±1,356	10.9%±0.2 pp52.3%±0.9 pp296,332±6,504	▲ +6.6%▼ -4.2%	8/5033/50
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show

Category	Ward 50
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents)	5.7%±1.6 pp15.6%±4.2 pp3,301±926
Born in India (of foreign-born residents)	4.7%±1.5 pp13.0%±3.9 pp2,748±853
Born in Pakistan (of foreign-born residents)	1.9%±0.8 pp5.2%±2.1 pp1,099±449
Born in Burma (of foreign-born residents)	1.5%±1.1 pp4.2%±2.9 pp889±610
Born in Vietnam (of foreign-born residents)	1.5%±0.5 pp4.0%±1.4 pp849±298
Born in Bosnia (of foreign-born residents)	1.4%±0.9 pp3.8%±2.5 pp809±540
Born in Korea (of foreign-born residents)	1.2%±0.5 pp3.4%±1.2 pp714±271
Born in Philippines (of foreign-born residents)	1.2%±0.4 pp3.3%±1.1 pp709±244
Born in Nigeria (of foreign-born residents)	1.2%±0.5 pp3.2%±1.3 pp676±281
Born in Iraq (of foreign-born residents)	1.1%±0.5 pp3.0%±1.3 pp639±282
Born in Malaysia (of foreign-born residents)	1.0%±0.5 pp2.8%±1.4 pp603±310
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	12.8%35.0%7,421
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	Chicago	Difference	Rank
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents)	5.7% ±1.6 pp15.6%±4.2 pp3,301	8.2% ±0.2 pp39.3%222,978	▼ -2.5%▼ -23.7%	22/5035/50
Born in India (of foreign-born residents)	4.7% ±1.5 pp13.0%±3.9 pp2,748	1.0% ±0.1 pp5.0%28,235	▲ +3.7%▲ +8.0%	2/507/50
Born in Pakistan (of foreign-born residents)	1.9% ±0.8 pp5.2%±2.1 pp1,099	0.2% ±0.0 pp0.9%5,111	▲ +1.7%▲ +4.3%	1/501/50
Born in Burma (of foreign-born residents)	1.5% ±1.1 pp4.2%±2.9 pp889	0.1% ±0.0 pp0.3%1,865	▲ +1.5%▲ +3.9%	1/501/50
Born in Vietnam (of foreign-born residents)	1.5% ±0.5 pp4.0%±1.4 pp849	0.2% ±0.0 pp1.2%6,676	▲ +1.2%▲ +2.8%	2/502/50
Born in Bosnia (of foreign-born residents)	1.4% ±0.9 pp3.8%±2.5 pp809	0.2% ±0.0 pp0.7%4,122	▲ +1.2%▲ +3.1%	1/501/50
Born in Korea (of foreign-born residents)	1.2% ±0.5 pp3.4%±1.2 pp714	0.3% ±0.0 pp1.4%7,987	▲ +0.9%▲ +2.0%	2/508/50
Born in Philippines (of foreign-born residents)	1.2% ±0.4 pp3.3%±1.1 pp709	0.8% ±0.1 pp3.8%21,740	▲ +0.4%▼ -0.5%	12/5019/50
Born in Nigeria (of foreign-born residents)	1.2% ±0.5 pp3.2%±1.3 pp676	0.3% ±0.0 pp1.6%9,223	▲ +0.8%▲ +1.6%	5/5014/50
Born in Iraq (of foreign-born residents)	1.1% ±0.5 pp3.0%±1.3 pp639	0.1% ±0.0 pp0.5%2,952	▲ +1.0%▲ +2.5%	1/502/50
Born in Malaysia (of foreign-born residents)	1.0% ±0.5 pp2.8%±1.4 pp603	0.1% ±0.0 pp0.3%1,586	▲ +1.0%▲ +2.6%	1/501/50
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	12.8%35.0%7,421	——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show

Category	Ward 50
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	13.7% ±2.0 pp37.5%±5.0 pp7,935 ±1,188
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	7.5% ±1.6 pp20.5%±4.1 pp4,338 ±920
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	5.9% ±0.9 pp16.1%±2.2 pp3,414 ±509
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	9.5% ±1.3 pp25.9%±3.2 pp5,488 ±759
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	13.7%±2.0 pp37.5%±5.0 pp7,935±1,188	5.9%±0.2 pp753.0%±55.9 pp159,447±5,557	▲ +7.8%▼ -715.5%	1/5016/50
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	7.5%±1.6 pp20.5%±4.1 pp4,338±920	4.5%±0.1 pp575.7%±42.2 pp121,912±4,035	▲ +3.0%▼ -555.2%	6/5027/50
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	5.9%±0.9 pp16.1%±2.2 pp3,414±509	4.6%±0.1 pp584.9%±42.5 pp123,849±3,901	▲ +1.3%▼ -568.8%	17/5042/50
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	9.5%±1.3 pp25.9%±3.2 pp5,488±759	6.0%±0.1 pp763.5%±52.6 pp161,675±3,491	▲ +3.5%▼ -737.6%	11/5027/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later	5.0% ±1.2 pp2,736 ±665	12.0% ±1.9 pp6,863 ±1,084	13.7% ±2.0 pp7,935 ±1,188	▲ +8.7 pp▲ +5,199▲ +1.7 pp▲ +1,072▲ +7.0 pp▲ +4,127
Chicago citywide	1.4% ±0.1 pp36,978 ±2,235	3.7% ±0.1 pp99,118 ±3,198	5.9% ±0.2 pp159,447 ±5,568	▲ +4.5 pp▲ +122,469▲ +2.2 pp▲ +60,329▲ +2.3 pp▲ +62,140
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009	14.7% ±2.0 pp8,005 ±1,084	10.4% ±1.4 pp5,947 ±787	7.5% ±1.6 pp4,338 ±920	▼ −7.2 pp▼ −3,667▼ −2.9 pp▼ −1,609▼ −4.3 pp▼ −2,058
Chicago citywide	5.9% ±0.1 pp161,331 ±3,896	4.9% ±0.1 pp131,658 ±3,182	4.5% ±0.1 pp121,912 ±4,044	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −39,419▼ −0.4 pp▼ −9,746▼ −1.1 pp▼ −29,673
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999	11.4% ±1.6 pp6,220 ±856	10.1% ±1.1 pp5,799 ±619	5.9% ±0.9 pp3,414 ±509	▼ −5.5 pp▼ −2,806▼ −4.2 pp▼ −2,385▼ −1.3 pp▼ −421
Chicago citywide	6.1% ±0.1 pp165,077 ±3,717	5.3% ±0.1 pp142,413 ±3,015	4.6% ±0.1 pp123,849 ±3,911	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −41,228▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,564▼ −0.8 pp▼ −22,664
Entered the U.S. Before 1990	13.1% ±1.3 pp7,122 ±725	9.7% ±1.1 pp5,556 ±627	9.5% ±1.3 pp5,488 ±759	▼ −3.6 pp▼ −1,634▼ −0.2 pp▼ −68▼ −3.4 pp▼ −1,566
Chicago citywide	7.5% ±0.1 pp204,169 ±3,469	6.9% ±0.1 pp186,050 ±3,114	6.0% ±0.1 pp161,675 ±3,509	▼ −1.6 pp▼ −42,494▼ −0.9 pp▼ −24,375▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,119

Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category	Ward 50
Average Household Income	$110,472±$8,767
Per Capita Income	$36,019±$2,250
10th Percentile Household Income	$14,672±$2,845
25th Percentile Household Income	$37,033±$4,403
Median Household Income	$75,320±$5,784
75th Percentile Household Income	$141,346±$12,770
90th Percentile Household Income	Over $200,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$110,472±$8,767	$116,016±$1,263	▼ −$5,544	21/50
Per Capita Income	$36,019±$2,250	$50,086±$581	▼ −$14,067	30/50
10th Percentile Household Income	$14,672±$2,845	$12,933±$271	▲ +$1,738	25/50
25th Percentile Household Income	$37,033±$4,403	$34,575±$649	▲ +$2,457	23/50
Median Household Income	$75,320±$5,784	$77,902±$907	▼ −$2,582	25/50
75th Percentile Household Income	$141,346±$12,770	$144,150±$1,210	▼ −$2,804	21/50
90th Percentile Household Income	Over $200,000	Over $200,000	—	1/50
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$93,209 ±8,057	$98,582 ±4,817	$110,472 ±8,767	▲ +$17,263▲ +$11,890▲ +$5,373
Chicago citywide	$95,689 ±910	$111,304 ±1,075	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$20,327▲ +$4,712▲ +$15,615
Average Household Income (nominal dollars)	$70,343 ±6,081	$80,344 ±3,926	$110,472 ±8,767	▲ +$40,128▲ +$30,127▲ +$10,001
Chicago citywide	$72,215 ±687	$90,713 ±876	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$43,801▲ +$25,303▲ +$18,498
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$31,287 ±2,284	$32,144 ±1,196	$36,019 ±2,250	▲ +$4,733▲ +$3,875▲ +$857
Chicago citywide	$37,927 ±351	$45,525 ±412	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$12,160▲ +$4,562▲ +$7,598
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars)	$23,612 ±1,724	$26,197 ±975	$36,019 ±2,250	▲ +$12,408▲ +$9,822▲ +$2,586
Chicago citywide	$28,623 ±265	$37,103 ±336	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$21,464▲ +$12,984▲ +$8,480
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$15,550 ±2,442	$16,719 ±2,642	$14,672 ±2,845	▼ −$879▼ −$2,047▲ +$1,168
Chicago citywide	$11,828 ±190	$13,281 ±277	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$1,105▼ −$348▲ +$1,453
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$11,736 ±1,843	$13,626 ±2,153	$14,672 ±2,845	▲ +$2,936▲ +$1,046▲ +$1,890
Chicago citywide	$8,927 ±144	$10,824 ±225	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$4,007▲ +$2,109▲ +$1,898
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$33,586 ±3,494	$35,206 ±2,867	$37,033 ±4,403	▲ +$3,446▲ +$1,826▲ +$1,620
Chicago citywide	$28,727 ±321	$31,597 ±462	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$5,848▲ +$2,979▲ +$2,869
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$25,347 ±2,637	$28,693 ±2,337	$37,033 ±4,403	▲ +$11,686▲ +$8,340▲ +$3,346
Chicago citywide	$21,680 ±242	$25,751 ±376	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$12,895▲ +$8,824▲ +$4,071
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$65,319 ±3,278	$68,932 ±3,838	$75,320 ±5,784	▲ +$10,001▲ +$6,388▲ +$3,613
Chicago citywide	$63,379 ±591	$71,469 ±723	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$14,523▲ +$6,433▲ +$8,090
Median Household Income (nominal dollars)	$49,295 ±2,474	$56,180 ±3,128	$75,320 ±5,784	▲ +$26,025▲ +$19,140▲ +$6,885
Chicago citywide	$47,831 ±446	$58,247 ±589	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$30,071▲ +$19,655▲ +$10,416
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$119,350 ±6,074	$127,508 ±7,493	$141,346 ±12,770	▲ +$21,996▲ +$13,838▲ +$8,158
Chicago citywide	$122,019 ±806	$139,501 ±1,057	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$22,131▲ +$4,648▲ +$17,482
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$90,071 ±4,584	$103,919 ±6,107	$141,346 ±12,770	▲ +$51,275▲ +$37,427▲ +$13,848
Chicago citywide	$92,086 ±608	$113,694 ±862	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$52,064▲ +$30,456▲ +$21,608
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$184,796 ±11,229	$211,466 ±12,342	—	——▲ +$26,670
Chicago citywide	$202,601 ±2,442	$235,390 ±1,636	—	——▲ +$32,790
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$139,463 ±8,474	$172,345 ±10,059	—	——▲ +$32,882
Chicago citywide	$152,899 ±1,843	$191,844 ±1,333	—	——▲ +$38,944

Poverty Status

Category	Ward 50
Below Poverty Line	20.0% ±3.0 pp11,630 ±1,775
Below 200% Poverty Line	40.0% ±4.2 pp23,283 ±2,448
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	7.7% ±1.6 pp4,485 ±917
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Below Poverty Line	20.0%±3.0 pp11,630±1,775	16.8%±0.4 pp456,194±11,330	▲ +3.1%	20/50
Below 200% Poverty Line	40.0%±4.2 pp23,283±2,448	33.4%±0.6 pp905,794±16,660	▲ +6.6%	17/50
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	7.7%±1.6 pp4,485±917	8.3%±0.3 pp226,117±7,649	▼ -0.6%	25/50
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Category	Ward 50
Food Insecurity	21.1%9,469
Housing Insecurity	15.4%6,898
Transportation Barriers	9.7%4,344
Threatened Utility Shutoff	8.9%3,984
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Food Insecurity	21.1%9,469	24.4%509,385	▼ -3.3%	33/50
Housing Insecurity	15.4%6,898	19.7%411,266	▼ -4.3%	34/50
Transportation Barriers	9.7%4,344	11.6%242,167	▼ -1.9%	33/50
Threatened Utility Shutoff	8.9%3,984	11.9%248,430	▼ -3.0%	32/50
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category	Ward 50
In Labor Force	79.8% ±2.7 pp16,880 ±577
↳ Employed	74.7% ±2.9 pp15,786 ±621
↳ Unemployed	5.2% ±1.6 pp1,094 ±336
↳ Unemployment Rate	6.5% ±2.0 pp—
Not in Labor Force	20.2% ±8.9 pp4,264 ±1,876
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
In Labor Force	79.8%±2.7 pp16,880±577	85.6%±0.3 pp1,069,076±3,571	▼ -5.7%	38/50
↳ Employed	74.7%±2.9 pp15,786±621	79.6%±0.3 pp994,466±4,015	▼ -4.9%	34/50
↳ Unemployed	5.2%±1.6 pp1,094±336	5.9%±0.2 pp73,968±2,565	▼ -0.7%	29/50
↳ Unemployment Rate	6.5%±2.0 pp—	6.9%±0.2 pp86,502±3,074	▼ -0.4%	26/50
Not in Labor Force	20.2%±8.9 pp4,264±1,876	14.4%±1.1 pp180,399±13,145	▲ +5.7%	13/50
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category	Ward 50
Management, Business, Science & Arts	46.2% ±4.6 pp11,299 ±1,135
↳ Management Occupations	10.6% ±2.1 pp2,602 ±505
↳ Business & Financial Operations	4.4% ±1.2 pp1,073 ±300
↳ Computer & Mathematical	4.1% ±1.5 pp996 ±366
↳ Architecture & Engineering	0.9% ±0.5 pp217 ±123
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	0.8% ±0.5 pp191 ±123
↳ Community & Social Service	3.0% ±1.0 pp726 ±234
↳ Legal Occupations	1.4% ±0.8 pp339 ±185
↳ Education, Training & Library	9.3% ±1.7 pp2,281 ±415
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	2.4% ±0.9 pp586 ±214
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	7.7% ±2.9 pp1,884 ±701
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	1.7% ±0.9 pp405 ±210
Service	17.9% ±2.6 pp4,378 ±641
↳ Healthcare Support	4.7% ±1.4 pp1,143 ±338
↳ Protective Service	1.1% ±0.6 pp280 ±153
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	3.7% ±1.0 pp900 ±242
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	4.4% ±1.4 pp1,084 ±348
↳ Personal Care & Service	4.0% ±1.4 pp972 ±337
Sales & Office	14.2% ±2.4 pp3,467 ±595
↳ Sales & Related	6.5% ±1.6 pp1,596 ±384
↳ Office & Administrative Support	7.7% ±1.8 pp1,871 ±446
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	6.3% ±2.4 pp1,532 ±586
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.0% ±0.3 pp12 ±85
↳ Construction & Extraction	4.1% ±2.1 pp999 ±517
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	2.1% ±1.2 pp522 ±287
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	15.4% ±2.6 pp3,772 ±638
↳ Production Occupations	5.8% ±1.5 pp1,414 ±362
↳ Transportation Occupations	4.3% ±1.2 pp1,058 ±297
↳ Material Moving Occupations	5.3% ±1.8 pp1,300 ±452
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts	46.2%±4.6 pp11,299±1,135	49.2%±0.4 pp686,743±5,710	▼ -3.0%	25/50
↳ Management Occupations	10.6%±2.1 pp2,602±505	12.3%±0.3 pp172,182±3,807	▼ -1.7%	24/50
↳ Business & Financial Operations	4.4%±1.2 pp1,073±300	9.1%±0.2 pp127,081±3,358	▼ -4.7%	40/50
↳ Computer & Mathematical	4.1%±1.5 pp996±366	4.9%±0.2 pp68,921±2,690	▼ -0.9%	23/50
↳ Architecture & Engineering	0.9%±0.5 pp217±123	1.6%±0.1 pp22,779±1,380	▼ -0.7%	38/50
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	0.8%±0.5 pp191±123	1.4%±0.1 pp19,126±1,340	▼ -0.6%	30/50
↳ Community & Social Service	3.0%±1.0 pp726±234	1.9%±0.1 pp26,973±1,500	▲ +1.0%	6/50
↳ Legal Occupations	1.4%±0.8 pp339±185	2.3%±0.1 pp31,629±1,814	▼ -0.9%	27/50
↳ Education, Training & Library	9.3%±1.7 pp2,281±415	6.6%±0.2 pp92,316±2,697	▲ +2.7%	3/50
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	2.4%±0.9 pp586±214	3.1%±0.1 pp43,879±1,786	▼ -0.7%	27/50
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	7.7%±2.9 pp1,884±701	4.6%±0.2 pp63,551±2,652	▲ +3.2%	5/50
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	1.7%±0.9 pp405±210	1.3%±0.1 pp18,306±1,387	▲ +0.3%	12/50
Service	17.9%±2.6 pp4,378±641	16.9%±0.3 pp235,977±4,217	▲ +1.0%	32/50
↳ Healthcare Support	4.7%±1.4 pp1,143±338	3.4%±0.2 pp46,792±2,107	▲ +1.3%	14/50
↳ Protective Service	1.1%±0.6 pp280±153	2.8%±0.1 pp39,146±1,734	▼ -1.7%	40/50
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	3.7%±1.0 pp900±242	5.1%±0.2 pp70,514±2,393	▼ -1.4%	38/50
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	4.4%±1.4 pp1,084±348	3.0%±0.1 pp41,783±1,967	▲ +1.4%	16/50
↳ Personal Care & Service	4.0%±1.4 pp972±337	2.7%±0.1 pp37,742±1,657	▲ +1.3%	4/50
Sales & Office	14.2%±2.4 pp3,467±595	17.4%±0.3 pp243,580±4,754	▼ -3.3%	49/50
↳ Sales & Related	6.5%±1.6 pp1,596±384	8.1%±0.2 pp113,073±3,174	▼ -1.6%	44/50
↳ Office & Administrative Support	7.7%±1.8 pp1,871±446	9.3%±0.3 pp130,507±3,591	▼ -1.7%	41/50
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	6.3%±2.4 pp1,532±586	4.6%±0.2 pp64,338±2,929	▲ +1.7%	19/50
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.0%±0.3 pp12±85	0.1%±0.0 pp1,506±406	▼ -0.1%	32/50
↳ Construction & Extraction	4.1%±2.1 pp999±517	2.8%±0.1 pp39,432±2,062	▲ +1.3%	17/50
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	2.1%±1.2 pp522±287	1.7%±0.1 pp23,400±1,722	▲ +0.5%	19/50
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	15.4%±2.6 pp3,772±638	11.8%±0.3 pp165,261±3,629	▲ +3.6%	22/50
↳ Production Occupations	5.8%±1.5 pp1,414±362	4.2%±0.2 pp57,989±2,275	▲ +1.6%	17/50
↳ Transportation Occupations	4.3%±1.2 pp1,058±297	3.9%±0.2 pp54,099±2,118	▲ +0.5%	28/50
↳ Material Moving Occupations	5.3%±1.8 pp1,300±452	3.8%±0.2 pp53,173±2,312	▲ +1.5%	19/50
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category	Ward 50
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0% ±0.3 pp9 ±85
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	0.0% ±0.3 pp0
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0% ±0.3 pp9 ±85
Construction	4.2% ±2.0 pp1,027 ±497
Manufacturing	7.6% ±1.5 pp1,865 ±370
Wholesale Trade	2.0% ±0.9 pp486 ±230
Retail Trade	10.1% ±2.0 pp2,471 ±497
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	8.2% ±2.1 pp2,003 ±507
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	7.2% ±1.8 pp1,769 ±449
↳ Utilities	1.0% ±1.1 pp234 ±263
Information	2.2% ±0.9 pp537 ±230
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	6.1% ±1.5 pp1,492 ±377
↳ Finance & Insurance	4.2% ±1.4 pp1,020 ±345
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.9% ±0.8 pp472 ±189
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	13.2% ±2.2 pp3,223 ±528
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	8.8% ±1.8 pp2,161 ±444
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0% ±0.3 pp0
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	4.3% ±1.4 pp1,061 ±346
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	30.4% ±2.9 pp7,431 ±700
↳ Educational Services	11.7% ±1.6 pp2,851 ±394
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	18.7% ±2.8 pp4,580 ±685
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	6.8% ±1.5 pp1,664 ±373
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	1.5% ±0.7 pp359 ±167
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	5.3% ±1.4 pp1,305 ±335
Other Services	6.9% ±1.4 pp1,693 ±345
Public Administration	2.2% ±0.9 pp548 ±226
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%±0.3 pp9±85	0.2%±0.0 pp—	▼ -0.2%	47/50
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	0.0%±0.3 pp0	0.2%±0.0 pp—	▼ -0.2%	46/50
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%±0.3 pp9±85	0.0%±0.0 pp—	0%	12/50
Construction	4.2%±2.0 pp1,027±497	3.8%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.4%	21/50
Manufacturing	7.6%±1.5 pp1,865±370	7.7%±0.2 pp—	▼ -0.1%	23/50
Wholesale Trade	2.0%±0.9 pp486±230	2.0%±0.1 pp—	0%	24/50
Retail Trade	10.1%±2.0 pp2,471±497	8.2%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.9%	12/50
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	8.2%±2.1 pp2,003±507	7.1%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.1%	23/50
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	7.2%±1.8 pp1,769±449	6.5%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.7%	24/50
↳ Utilities	1.0%±1.1 pp234±263	0.5%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.4%	6/50
Information	2.2%±0.9 pp537±230	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.1%	20/50
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	6.1%±1.5 pp1,492±377	8.8%±0.2 pp—	▼ -2.7%	33/50
↳ Finance & Insurance	4.2%±1.4 pp1,020±345	6.7%±0.2 pp—	▼ -2.5%	37/50
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.9%±0.8 pp472±189	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.2%	27/50
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	13.2%±2.2 pp3,223±528	18.2%±0.4 pp—	▼ -5.0%	32/50
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	8.8%±1.8 pp2,161±444	13.4%±0.3 pp—	▼ -4.6%	27/50
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%±0.3 pp0	0.1%±0.0 pp—	▼ -0.1%	37/50
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	4.3%±1.4 pp1,061±346	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▼ -0.3%	28/50
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	30.4%±2.9 pp7,431±700	24.2%±0.4 pp—	▲ +6.2%	11/50
↳ Educational Services	11.7%±1.6 pp2,851±394	10.5%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.2%	13/50
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	18.7%±2.8 pp4,580±685	13.7%±0.3 pp—	▲ +5.1%	8/50
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	6.8%±1.5 pp1,664±373	9.1%±0.2 pp—	▼ -2.3%	41/50
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	1.5%±0.7 pp359±167	2.2%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.7%	39/50
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	5.3%±1.4 pp1,305±335	6.9%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.6%	35/50
Other Services	6.9%±1.4 pp1,693±345	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▲ +2.3%	3/50
Public Administration	2.2%±0.9 pp548±226	4.0%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.8%	42/50
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category	Ward 50
Private Company Employee	61.4% ±1.7 pp15,003 ±410
Self-Employed	12.2% ±2.6 pp2,989 ±646
Nonprofit	17.3% ±2.8 pp4,226 ±687
Government	9.1% ±1.7 pp2,219 ±423
Unpaid Family Worker	0.0% ±0.3 pp12 ±85
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Private Company Employee	61.4%±1.7 pp15,003±410	67.9%±0.4 pp947,845±5,822	▼ -6.5%	37/50
Self-Employed	12.2%±2.6 pp2,989±646	8.3%±0.2 pp115,690±2,989	▲ +3.9%	2/50
Nonprofit	17.3%±2.8 pp4,226±687	12.1%±0.3 pp169,124±4,035	▲ +5.2%	5/50
Government	9.1%±1.7 pp2,219±423	12.9%±0.3 pp179,945±4,021	▼ -3.8%	39/50
Unpaid Family Worker	0.0%±0.3 pp12±85	0.2%±0.0 pp2,312±408	▼ -0.1%	36/50
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category	Ward 50
Full-Time, Year-Round	58.6% ±2.8 pp15,471 ±731
Part-Time or Part-Year	41.4% ±3.2 pp10,918 ±856
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round	58.6%±2.8 pp15,471±731	67.0%±0.3 pp1,025,726±3,875	▼ -8.4%	45/50
Part-Time or Part-Year	41.4%±3.2 pp10,918±856	33.0%±0.3 pp504,210±4,897	▲ +8.4%	6/50
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category	Ward 50
Average FT Earnings	$86,364±$6,367
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$27,468±$2,413
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$38,966±$2,398
Median FT Earnings	$60,579±$4,965
75th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000
90th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Average FT Earnings	$86,364±$6,367	$96,214±$968	▼ −$9,851	22/50
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$27,468±$2,413	$29,008±$387	▼ −$1,540	27/50
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$38,966±$2,398	$43,011±$345	▼ −$4,045	28/50
Median FT Earnings	$60,579±$4,965	$69,663±$530	▼ −$9,083	27/50
75th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000	Over $100,000	—	1/50
90th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000	Over $100,000	—	1/50
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$67,657 ±2,647	$74,277 ±4,027	$86,364 ±6,367	▲ +$18,707▲ +$12,086▲ +$6,620
Chicago citywide	$83,170 ±714	$91,467 ±682	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$13,044▲ +$4,747▲ +$8,297
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$51,060 ±1,997	$60,536 ±3,282	$86,364 ±6,367	▲ +$35,304▲ +$25,827▲ +$9,477
Chicago citywide	$62,767 ±539	$74,546 ±556	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$33,447▲ +$21,669▲ +$11,778
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$21,928 ±1,057	$24,616 ±1,744	$27,468 ±2,413	▲ +$5,541▲ +$2,852▲ +$2,688
Chicago citywide	$24,209 ±243	$26,113 ±152	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$4,799▲ +$2,895▲ +$1,904
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$16,549 ±798	$20,062 ±1,421	$27,468 ±2,413	▲ +$10,920▲ +$7,406▲ +$3,514
Chicago citywide	$18,270 ±183	$21,282 ±124	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$10,738▲ +$7,726▲ +$3,012
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$32,038 ±2,558	$34,529 ±1,673	$38,966 ±2,398	▲ +$6,928▲ +$4,437▲ +$2,491
Chicago citywide	$37,393 ±278	$39,415 ±229	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$5,618▲ +$3,597▲ +$2,021
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$24,178 ±1,931	$28,141 ±1,364	$38,966 ±2,398	▲ +$14,788▲ +$10,825▲ +$3,963
Chicago citywide	$28,220 ±210	$32,123 ±187	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$14,791▲ +$10,888▲ +$3,903
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$51,733 ±2,278	$54,285 ±2,892	$60,579 ±4,965	▲ +$8,846▲ +$6,294▲ +$2,552
Chicago citywide	$60,575 ±496	$64,628 ±327	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,034▲ +$4,054
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$39,042 ±1,719	$44,242 ±2,357	$60,579 ±4,965	▲ +$21,537▲ +$16,337▲ +$5,200
Chicago citywide	$45,715 ±374	$52,672 ±266	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$23,948▲ +$16,991▲ +$6,957
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$81,565 ±3,808	$92,008 ±5,453	—	——▲ +$10,444
Chicago citywide	$98,274 ±615	$108,202 ±616	—	——▲ +$9,928
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$61,555 ±2,874	$74,987 ±4,444	—	——▲ +$13,431
Chicago citywide	$74,166 ±464	$88,185 ±502	—	——▲ +$14,019
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$128,907 ±4,366	—	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$97,284 ±3,295	—	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category	Ward 50
Average PT Earnings	$28,526±$3,706
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$2,438±$580
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$7,754±$1,872
Median PT Earnings	$18,278±$2,526
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$34,748±$3,380
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$63,122±$9,257
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Average PT Earnings	$28,526±$3,706	$33,575±$750	▼ −$5,049	27/50
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$2,438±$580	$2,183±$87	▲ +$255	19/50
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$7,754±$1,872	$7,222±$206	▲ +$533	23/50
Median PT Earnings	$18,278±$2,526	$19,180±$393	▼ −$902	23/50
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$34,748±$3,380	$38,498±$681	▼ −$3,750	26/50
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$63,122±$9,257	$73,776±$1,391	▼ −$10,655	27/50
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$30,322 ±6,819	$28,427 ±3,104	$28,526 ±3,706	▼ −$1,796▲ +$99▼ −$1,894
Chicago citywide	$27,076 ±473	$31,236 ±676	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$6,500▲ +$2,340▲ +$4,160
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$22,883 ±5,147	$23,168 ±2,530	$28,526 ±3,706	▲ +$5,643▲ +$5,358▲ +$285
Chicago citywide	$20,433 ±357	$25,457 ±551	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$13,142▲ +$8,118▲ +$5,024
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,328 ±423	$2,482 ±428	$2,438 ±580	▲ +$111▼ −$43▲ +$154
Chicago citywide	$2,230 ±48	$2,283 ±59	$2,183 ±87	▼ −$47▼ −$100▲ +$53
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$1,757 ±319	$2,023 ±348	$2,438 ±580	▲ +$682▲ +$416▲ +$266
Chicago citywide	$1,683 ±36	$1,861 ±48	$2,183 ±87	▲ +$500▲ +$322▲ +$178
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$7,462 ±777	$7,307 ±736	$7,754 ±1,872	▲ +$293▲ +$447▼ −$154
Chicago citywide	$6,390 ±123	$6,841 ±156	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$832▲ +$381▲ +$451
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$5,631 ±586	$5,956 ±600	$7,754 ±1,872	▲ +$2,123▲ +$1,799▲ +$325
Chicago citywide	$4,822 ±93	$5,575 ±127	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$2,399▲ +$1,646▲ +$753
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$15,886 ±1,783	$16,899 ±1,501	$18,278 ±2,526	▲ +$2,392▲ +$1,378▲ +$1,014
Chicago citywide	$15,461 ±166	$17,025 ±275	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$3,719▲ +$2,155▲ +$1,563
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$11,989 ±1,346	$13,773 ±1,223	$18,278 ±2,526	▲ +$6,289▲ +$4,505▲ +$1,784
Chicago citywide	$11,668 ±125	$13,875 ±224	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$7,512▲ +$5,305▲ +$2,207
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$33,589 ±4,644	$36,127 ±3,781	$34,748 ±3,380	▲ +$1,159▼ −$1,379▲ +$2,538
Chicago citywide	$30,795 ±619	$34,779 ±505	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$7,703▲ +$3,719▲ +$3,984
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$25,349 ±3,505	$29,444 ±3,082	$34,748 ±3,380	▲ +$9,399▲ +$5,304▲ +$4,095
Chicago citywide	$23,241 ±468	$28,345 ±412	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$15,257▲ +$10,153▲ +$5,104
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$62,938 ±5,978	$66,597 ±6,569	$63,122 ±9,257	▲ +$183▼ −$3,475▲ +$3,659
Chicago citywide	$61,207 ±1,249	$68,040 ±1,298	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$12,570▲ +$5,737▲ +$6,833
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$47,498 ±4,511	$54,276 ±5,354	$63,122 ±9,257	▲ +$15,623▲ +$8,845▲ +$6,778
Chicago citywide	$46,192 ±942	$55,452 ±1,058	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$27,585▲ +$18,324▲ +$9,261

Earnings of All Workers

Category	Ward 50
Average Earnings	$62,059±$2,820
10th Percentile Earnings	$7,036±$1,653
25th Percentile Earnings	$21,290±$2,870
Median Earnings	$42,758±$3,251
75th Percentile Earnings	$82,207±$5,810
90th Percentile Earnings	Over $100,000
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Average Earnings	$62,059±$2,820	$75,571±$768	▼ −$13,512	25/50
10th Percentile Earnings	$7,036±$1,653	$8,529±$272	▼ −$1,493	30/50
25th Percentile Earnings	$21,290±$2,870	$25,183±$358	▼ −$3,893	31/50
Median Earnings	$42,758±$3,251	$51,367±$471	▼ −$8,609	29/50
75th Percentile Earnings	$82,207±$5,810	$93,324±$598	▼ −$11,116	25/50
90th Percentile Earnings	Over $100,000	Over $100,000	—	1/50
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$52,213 ±2,944	$56,413 ±2,512	$62,059 ±2,820	▲ +$9,846▲ +$5,646▲ +$4,200
Chicago citywide	$62,453 ±534	$71,626 ±551	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$13,118▲ +$3,945▲ +$9,173
Average Earnings (nominal dollars)	$39,404 ±2,222	$45,977 ±2,047	$62,059 ±2,820	▲ +$22,655▲ +$16,082▲ +$6,572
Chicago citywide	$47,133 ±403	$58,375 ±449	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$28,438▲ +$17,196▲ +$11,243
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$7,095 ±944	$7,509 ±759	$7,036 ±1,653	▼ −$59▼ −$473▲ +$414
Chicago citywide	$6,858 ±139	$8,358 ±164	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$1,671▲ +$171▲ +$1,500
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$5,354 ±712	$6,120 ±619	$7,036 ±1,653	▲ +$1,682▲ +$916▲ +$766
Chicago citywide	$5,176 ±105	$6,812 ±134	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$3,354▲ +$1,717▲ +$1,636
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$18,020 ±2,059	$19,424 ±1,418	$21,290 ±2,870	▲ +$3,270▲ +$1,866▲ +$1,404
Chicago citywide	$19,598 ±241	$23,173 ±290	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$5,585▲ +$2,010▲ +$3,576
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$13,599 ±1,554	$15,831 ±1,156	$21,290 ±2,870	▲ +$7,691▲ +$5,459▲ +$2,231
Chicago citywide	$14,790 ±182	$18,886 ±236	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$10,393▲ +$6,297▲ +$4,096
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$37,531 ±2,397	$39,365 ±1,594	$42,758 ±3,251	▲ +$5,226▲ +$3,393▲ +$1,834
Chicago citywide	$42,365 ±293	$47,195 ±370	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$9,002▲ +$4,172▲ +$4,830
Median Earnings (nominal dollars)	$28,324 ±1,809	$32,083 ±1,299	$42,758 ±3,251	▲ +$14,433▲ +$10,675▲ +$3,758
Chicago citywide	$31,972 ±221	$38,464 ±302	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$19,395▲ +$12,903▲ +$6,492
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$65,282 ±2,963	$69,328 ±3,591	$82,207 ±5,810	▲ +$16,926▲ +$12,880▲ +$4,046
Chicago citywide	$78,784 ±555	$87,853 ±597	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$14,540▲ +$5,471▲ +$9,069
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$49,267 ±2,236	$56,502 ±2,927	$82,207 ±5,810	▲ +$32,940▲ +$25,705▲ +$7,235
Chicago citywide	$59,457 ±418	$71,600 ±486	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$33,867▲ +$21,723▲ +$12,144
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$109,640 ±6,621	$118,844 ±3,885	—	——▲ +$9,204
Chicago citywide	$128,659 ±682	—	—	———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$82,744 ±4,997	$96,858 ±3,166	—	——▲ +$14,114
Chicago citywide	$97,097 ±515	—	—	———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 50

Category	Ward 50
Household income at age 35	$62,944 ±$1,018
Household income percentile rank	53.9 ±0.55 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	25.7% ±0.81 pp
Individual income at age 35	$42,380 ±$658
Fraction married	49.6% ±0.92 pp
Employment rate	72.9% ±0.83 pp
Incarceration rate	0.80% ±0.18 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 50. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 50 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$62,944 ±$1,018	$43,090 ±$102	+$19,855
Household income percentile rank	53.9 ±0.55 pp	40.9 ±0.06 pp	+13.1 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	25.7% ±0.81 pp	11.4% ±0.08 pp	+14.2 pp
Individual income at age 35	$42,380 ±$658	$33,544 ±$80	+$8,836
Fraction married	49.6% ±0.92 pp	26.4% ±0.11 pp	+23.3 pp
Employment rate	72.9% ±0.83 pp	74.4% ±0.11 pp	−1.5 pp
Incarceration rate	0.80% ±0.18 pp	2.87% ±0.05 pp	−2.1 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 50. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 50 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 50 in Lower-Income Families

Category	Ward 50
Household income at age 35	$53,797 ±$1,343
Household income percentile rank	48.5 ±0.82 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	19.4% ±1.22 pp
Individual income at age 35	$37,739 ±$937
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 50 with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 50 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$53,797 ±$1,343	$34,711 ±$124	+$19,085
Household income percentile rank	48.5 ±0.82 pp	35.3 ±0.09 pp	+13.2 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	19.4% ±1.22 pp	6.31% ±0.09 pp	+13.1 pp
Individual income at age 35	$37,739 ±$937	$28,716 ±$106	+$9,023
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 50 with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 50 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Ward 50

Category	Ward 50
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	73.1% ±0.83 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	22.0% ±0.79 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 50. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 50 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	73.1% ±0.83 pp	78.1% ±0.11 pp	−5.0 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	22.0% ±0.79 pp	22.9% ±0.11 pp	−0.8 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 50. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 50 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Ward 50

Category	Ward 50
All jobs located in ward 50	10,644
Ward 50 jobs held by Ward 50 residents	10.4%
Ward 50 jobs held by non-Ward 50 residents	89.6%
Employed residents working in Ward 50	4.8%
Employed residents working outside Ward 50	95.2%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 50	Chicago ward median	Difference	Rank
All jobs located in ward 50	10,644	11,093	▼ −449	28/50
Ward 50 jobs held by Ward 50 residents	10.4%	6.3%	▲ +4.1 pp	6/50
Ward 50 jobs held by non-Ward 50 residents	89.6%	93.7%	▼ −4.1 pp	45/50
Employed residents working in Ward 50	4.8%	3.2%	▲ +1.6 pp	11/50
Employed residents working outside Ward 50	95.2%	96.8%	▼ −1.6 pp	40/50
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in ward 50	9,104	10,126	10,644	▲ +1,540▲ +518▲ +1,022
Chicago citywide	10,920	11,554	11,093	▲ +174▼ −460▲ +634
Ward 50 jobs held by Ward 50 residents	10.4%815	10.8%914	10.4%934	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +119▼ −0.3 pp▲ +20▲ +0.4 pp▲ +99
Chicago citywide	6.4%696	6.4%725	6.3%701	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5▼ −0.1 pp▼ −24– 0.0 pp▲ +29
Ward 50 jobs held by non-Ward 50 residents	89.6%7,045	89.2%7,581	89.6%8,012	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +967▲ +0.3 pp▲ +431▼ −0.4 pp▲ +536
Chicago citywide	93.6%9,244	93.6%9,497	93.7%9,122	▲ +0.1 pp▼ −122▲ +0.1 pp▼ −375– 0.0 pp▲ +253
Employed residents working in Ward 50	4.2%815	4.7%914	4.8%934	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +119▲ +0.1 pp▲ +20▲ +0.5 pp▲ +99
Chicago citywide	3.3%696	3.0%725	3.2%701	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5▲ +0.1 pp▼ −24▼ −0.2 pp▲ +29
Employed residents working outside Ward 50	95.8%18,512	95.3%18,652	95.2%18,692	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +180▼ −0.1 pp▲ +40▼ −0.5 pp▲ +140
Chicago citywide	96.7%19,233	97.0%20,782	96.8%20,998	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,765▼ −0.1 pp▲ +216▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,549

Industry of Jobs in Ward 50

Category	Ward 50
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0
Construction	1.2%132
Manufacturing	0.8%90
Wholesale Trade	0.8%80
Retail Trade	14.4%1,532
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	0.8%87
↳ Utilities	0.0%0
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	0.8%87
Information	0.2%16
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	4.7%502
↳ Finance & Insurance	3.6%385
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.1%117
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	18.3%1,949
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	14.2%1,513
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.8%80
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	3.3%356
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	46.7%4,967
↳ Educational Services	0.9%97
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	45.8%4,870
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	8.5%906
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	0.5%57
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	8.0%849
Other Services	3.6%383
Public Administration	0.0%0
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0	0.0%423	0%	22/50
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0	0.0%36	0%	10/50
Construction	1.2%132	1.9%27,207	▼ -0.6%	37/50
Manufacturing	0.8%90	4.4%64,747	▼ -3.6%	43/50
Wholesale Trade	0.8%80	2.8%41,460	▼ -2.1%	42/50
Retail Trade	14.4%1,532	6.6%96,413	▲ +7.8%	22/50
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	0.8%87	6.0%87,845	▼ -5.2%	38/50
↳ Utilities	0.0%0	0.3%5,012	▼ -0.3%	20/50
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	0.8%87	5.7%82,833	▼ -4.8%	35/50
Information	0.2%16	3.5%51,095	▼ -3.3%	42/50
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	4.7%502	10.8%157,520	▼ -6.0%	19/50
↳ Finance & Insurance	3.6%385	8.6%125,824	▼ -5.0%	9/50
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.1%117	2.2%31,696	▼ -1.1%	34/50
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	18.3%1,949	23.2%339,220	▼ -4.9%	12/50
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	14.2%1,513	14.2%207,444	0%	4/50
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.8%80	1.2%16,872	▼ -0.4%	8/50
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	3.3%356	7.9%114,904	▼ -4.5%	34/50
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	46.7%4,967	23.0%336,089	▲ +23.7%	7/50
↳ Educational Services	0.9%97	9.2%134,671	▼ -8.3%	47/50
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	45.8%4,870	13.8%201,418	▲ +32.0%	2/50
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	8.5%906	10.3%151,055	▼ -1.8%	34/50
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	0.5%57	1.9%27,339	▼ -1.3%	27/50
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	8.0%849	8.5%123,716	▼ -0.5%	34/50
Other Services	3.6%383	4.0%59,136	▼ -0.4%	34/50
Public Administration	0.0%0	3.5%51,418	▼ -3.5%	22/50
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.0%181	0.0%569	0.0%423	– 0.0 pp▲ +242– 0.0 pp▼ −146– 0.0 pp▲ +388
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.0%140	0.0%374	0.0%36	– 0.0 pp▼ −104– 0.0 pp▼ −338– 0.0 pp▲ +234
Construction	1.2%109	0.9%89	1.2%132	– 0.0 pp▲ +23▲ +0.4 pp▲ +43▼ −0.3 pp▼ −20
Chicago citywide	1.6%20,789	1.8%26,012	1.9%27,207	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,418– 0.0 pp▲ +1,195▲ +0.3 pp▲ +5,223
Manufacturing	1.3%118	1.0%106	0.8%90	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −28▼ −0.2 pp▼ −16▼ −0.2 pp▼ −12
Chicago citywide	4.6%61,066	4.5%63,597	4.4%64,747	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,681▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,150▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,531
Wholesale Trade	1.4%132	1.0%104	0.8%80	▼ −0.7 pp▼ −52▼ −0.3 pp▼ −24▼ −0.4 pp▼ −28
Chicago citywide	3.0%39,431	2.9%41,789	2.8%41,460	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,029▼ −0.1 pp▼ −329▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,358
Retail Trade	14.4%1,315	13.6%1,378	14.4%1,532	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +217▲ +0.8 pp▲ +154▼ −0.8 pp▲ +63
Chicago citywide	7.4%97,262	6.9%97,836	6.6%96,413	▼ −0.8 pp▼ −849▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,423▼ −0.5 pp▲ +574
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	0.9%80	0.6%65	0.8%87	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7▲ +0.2 pp▲ +22▼ −0.2 pp▼ −15
Chicago citywide	5.4%71,371	5.6%79,303	6.0%87,845	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +16,474▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,542▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,932
Utilities	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,383	0.3%4,956	0.3%5,012	– 0.0 pp▲ +629– 0.0 pp▲ +56– 0.0 pp▲ +573
Transportation & Warehousing	0.9%80	0.6%65	0.8%87	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7▲ +0.2 pp▲ +22▼ −0.2 pp▼ −15
Chicago citywide	5.1%66,988	5.2%74,347	5.7%82,833	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +15,845▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,486▲ +0.1 pp▲ +7,359
Information	0.8%74	0.3%30	0.2%16	▼ −0.7 pp▼ −58▼ −0.1 pp▼ −14▼ −0.5 pp▼ −44
Chicago citywide	3.1%40,514	3.4%48,135	3.5%51,095	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +10,581▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,960▲ +0.3 pp▲ +7,621
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	5.9%541	6.2%628	4.7%502	▼ −1.2 pp▼ −39▼ −1.5 pp▼ −126▲ +0.3 pp▲ +87
Chicago citywide	10.5%138,287	10.6%150,163	10.8%157,520	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +19,233▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,357▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,876
Finance & Insurance	4.5%410	4.8%487	3.6%385	▼ −0.9 pp▼ −25▼ −1.2 pp▼ −102▲ +0.3 pp▲ +77
Chicago citywide	8.5%111,307	8.4%119,147	8.6%125,824	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14,517▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,677▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7,840
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.4%131	1.4%141	1.1%117	▼ −0.3 pp▼ −14▼ −0.3 pp▼ −24– 0.0 pp▲ +10
Chicago citywide	2.1%26,980	2.2%31,016	2.2%31,696	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,716– 0.0 pp▲ +680▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,036
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	16.2%1,474	17.4%1,766	18.3%1,949	▲ +2.1 pp▲ +475▲ +0.9 pp▲ +183▲ +1.2 pp▲ +292
Chicago citywide	21.2%278,928	22.6%319,744	23.2%339,220	▲ +2.0 pp▲ +60,292▲ +0.6 pp▲ +19,476▲ +1.3 pp▲ +40,816
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	11.7%1,064	15.3%1,547	14.2%1,513	▲ +2.5 pp▲ +449▼ −1.1 pp▼ −34▲ +3.6 pp▲ +483
Chicago citywide	11.8%155,200	12.9%182,462	14.2%207,444	▲ +2.4 pp▲ +52,244▲ +1.3 pp▲ +24,982▲ +1.1 pp▲ +27,262
Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.3%28	0.3%27	0.8%80	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +52▲ +0.5 pp▲ +53– 0.0 pp▼ −1
Chicago citywide	1.0%13,619	1.2%16,600	1.2%16,872	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,253– 0.0 pp▲ +272▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,981
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	4.2%382	1.9%192	3.3%356	▼ −0.9 pp▼ −26▲ +1.4 pp▲ +164▼ −2.3 pp▼ −190
Chicago citywide	8.4%110,109	8.5%120,682	7.9%114,904	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +4,795▼ −0.7 pp▼ −5,778▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,573
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	42.1%3,829	45.5%4,610	46.7%4,967	▲ +4.6 pp▲ +1,138▲ +1.1 pp▲ +357▲ +3.5 pp▲ +781
Chicago citywide	23.5%308,633	22.1%313,540	23.0%336,089	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +27,456▲ +0.8 pp▲ +22,549▼ −1.4 pp▲ +4,907
Educational Services	2.6%238	1.0%103	0.9%97	▼ −1.7 pp▼ −141▼ −0.1 pp▼ −6▼ −1.6 pp▼ −135
Chicago citywide	10.1%132,909	9.0%128,169	9.2%134,671	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +1,762▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,502▼ −1.1 pp▼ −4,740
Health Care & Social Assistance	39.4%3,591	44.5%4,507	45.8%4,870	▲ +6.3 pp▲ +1,279▲ +1.2 pp▲ +363▲ +5.1 pp▲ +916
Chicago citywide	13.4%175,724	13.1%185,371	13.8%201,418	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +25,694▲ +0.7 pp▲ +16,047▼ −0.3 pp▲ +9,647
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	9.8%890	8.8%890	8.5%906	▼ −1.3 pp▲ +16▼ −0.3 pp▲ +16▼ −1.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	10.9%143,753	11.5%162,749	10.3%151,055	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,302▼ −1.2 pp▼ −11,694▲ +0.5 pp▲ +18,996
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	0.4%37	0.1%8	0.5%57	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +20▲ +0.5 pp▲ +49▼ −0.3 pp▼ −29
Chicago citywide	1.7%22,179	2.1%30,178	1.9%27,339	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +5,160▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,839▲ +0.4 pp▲ +7,999
Accommodation & Food Services	9.4%853	8.7%882	8.0%849	▼ −1.4 pp▼ −4▼ −0.7 pp▼ −33▼ −0.7 pp▲ +29
Chicago citywide	9.3%121,574	9.4%132,571	8.5%123,716	▼ −0.8 pp▲ +2,142▼ −0.9 pp▼ −8,855▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,997
Other Services	5.8%524	4.5%460	3.6%383	▼ −2.2 pp▼ −141▼ −0.9 pp▼ −77▼ −1.2 pp▼ −64
Chicago citywide	4.5%59,098	4.4%61,698	4.0%59,136	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +38▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,562▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,600
Public Administration	0.2%18	0.0%0	0.0%0	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −18– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.2 pp▼ −18
Chicago citywide	4.2%54,814	3.6%51,684	3.5%51,418	▼ −0.7 pp▼ −3,396▼ −0.1 pp▼ −266▼ −0.5 pp▼ −3,130

Earnings of Jobs in Ward 50

Category	Ward 50
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	22.0%2,340
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	38.5%4,097
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	39.5%4,207
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	22.0%2,340	12.7%185,297	▲ +9.3%	11/50
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	38.5%4,097	20.5%299,480	▲ +18.0%	5/50
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	39.5%4,207	66.9%978,851	▼ -27.4%	45/50
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	36.2%3,297	31.6%3,196	22.0%2,340	▼ −14.2 pp▼ −957▼ −9.6 pp▼ −856▼ −4.7 pp▼ −101
Chicago citywide	21.3%280,137	16.8%238,135	12.7%185,297	▼ −8.7 pp▼ −94,840▼ −4.1 pp▼ −52,838▼ −4.5 pp▼ −42,002
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	36.1%3,289	36.9%3,733	38.5%4,097	▲ +2.4 pp▲ +808▲ +1.6 pp▲ +364▲ +0.7 pp▲ +444
Chicago citywide	30.7%403,250	26.7%378,530	20.5%299,480	▼ −10.2 pp▼ −103,770▼ −6.3 pp▼ −79,050▼ −4.0 pp▼ −24,720
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	27.7%2,518	31.6%3,197	39.5%4,207	▲ +11.9 pp▲ +1,689▲ +8.0 pp▲ +1,010▲ +3.9 pp▲ +679
Chicago citywide	48.0%630,740	56.5%800,154	66.9%978,851	▲ +18.9 pp▲ +348,111▲ +10.4 pp▲ +178,697▲ +8.5 pp▲ +169,414

Jobs in Ward 50 by Firm Age

Category	Ward 50
Firm age: 0–1 years	3.3%348
Firm age: 2–3 years	4.2%446
Firm age: 4–5 years	6.4%679
Firm age: 6–10 years	9.1%969
Firm age: 11 or more years	77.1%8,202
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years	3.3%348	2.8%37,293	▲ +0.4%	29/50
Firm age: 2–3 years	4.2%446	2.8%37,154	▲ +1.4%	15/50
Firm age: 4–5 years	6.4%679	3.2%41,869	▲ +3.2%	6/50
Firm age: 6–10 years	9.1%969	7.8%102,354	▲ +1.3%	22/50
Firm age: 11 or more years	77.1%8,202	83.4%1,098,247	▼ -6.3%	34/50
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years	2.5%226	4.3%430	3.3%348	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +122▼ −1.0 pp▼ −82▲ +1.8 pp▲ +204
Chicago citywide	2.9%33,224	2.6%33,244	2.8%37,293	– 0.0 pp▲ +4,069▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,049▼ −0.2 pp▲ +20
Firm age: 2–3 years	5.0%458	4.5%455	4.2%446	▼ −0.9 pp▼ −12▼ −0.3 pp▼ −9▼ −0.5 pp▼ −3
Chicago citywide	4.0%46,935	3.3%42,284	2.8%37,154	▼ −1.2 pp▼ −9,781▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,130▼ −0.7 pp▼ −4,651
Firm age: 4–5 years	6.1%558	2.6%258	6.4%679	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +121▲ +3.8 pp▲ +421▼ −3.6 pp▼ −300
Chicago citywide	3.7%42,688	3.6%46,058	3.2%41,869	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −819▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,189▼ −0.1 pp▲ +3,370
Firm age: 6–10 years	13.7%1,246	12.3%1,248	9.1%969	▼ −4.6 pp▼ −277▼ −3.2 pp▼ −279▼ −1.4 pp▲ +2
Chicago citywide	8.2%94,955	8.6%109,934	7.8%102,354	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +7,399▼ −0.9 pp▼ −7,580▲ +0.5 pp▲ +14,979
Firm age: 11 or more years	72.6%6,598	76.4%7,720	77.1%8,202	▲ +4.4 pp▲ +1,604▲ +0.7 pp▲ +482▲ +3.7 pp▲ +1,122
Chicago citywide	81.3%946,852	81.8%1,043,037	83.4%1,098,247	▲ +2.1 pp▲ +151,395▲ +1.6 pp▲ +55,210▲ +0.5 pp▲ +96,185

Jobs in Ward 50 by Firm Size

Category	Ward 50
Firm size: 0–19 employees	24.6%2,614
Firm size: 20–49 employees	9.6%1,027
Firm size: 50–249 employees	20.4%2,174
Firm size: 250–499 employees	6.5%687
Firm size: 500 or more employees	38.9%4,142
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees	24.6%2,614	12.8%168,975	▲ +11.7%	16/50
Firm size: 20–49 employees	9.6%1,027	7.3%96,432	▲ +2.3%	25/50
Firm size: 50–249 employees	20.4%2,174	13.8%181,123	▲ +6.7%	11/50
Firm size: 250–499 employees	6.5%687	5.7%74,787	▲ +0.8%	16/50
Firm size: 500 or more employees	38.9%4,142	60.4%795,600	▼ -21.5%	37/50
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees	28.9%2,623	26.3%2,655	24.6%2,614	▼ −4.3 pp▼ −9▼ −1.7 pp▼ −41▼ −2.6 pp▲ +32
Chicago citywide	13.9%162,248	13.3%169,949	12.8%168,975	▼ −1.1 pp▲ +6,727▼ −0.5 pp▼ −974▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,701
Firm size: 20–49 employees	14.4%1,304	8.9%896	9.6%1,027	▼ −4.7 pp▼ −277▲ +0.8 pp▲ +131▼ −5.5 pp▼ −408
Chicago citywide	8.4%97,503	8.2%103,945	7.3%96,432	▼ −1.0 pp▼ −1,071▼ −0.8 pp▼ −7,513▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,442
Firm size: 50–249 employees	19.8%1,795	20.7%2,091	20.4%2,174	▲ +0.7 pp▲ +379▼ −0.3 pp▲ +83▲ +0.9 pp▲ +296
Chicago citywide	15.7%183,275	14.9%189,930	13.8%181,123	▼ −2.0 pp▼ −2,152▼ −1.1 pp▼ −8,807▼ −0.8 pp▲ +6,655
Firm size: 250–499 employees	2.6%240	5.8%582	6.5%687	▲ +3.8 pp▲ +447▲ +0.7 pp▲ +105▲ +3.1 pp▲ +342
Chicago citywide	6.3%72,992	5.9%74,603	5.7%74,787	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,795▼ −0.2 pp▲ +184▼ −0.4 pp▲ +1,611
Firm size: 500 or more employees	34.4%3,124	38.4%3,887	38.9%4,142	▲ +4.5 pp▲ +1,018▲ +0.5 pp▲ +255▲ +4.1 pp▲ +763
Chicago citywide	55.7%648,636	57.8%736,130	60.4%795,600	▲ +4.7 pp▲ +146,964▲ +2.7 pp▲ +59,470▲ +2.1 pp▲ +87,494

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 50
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	22.2% ±1.4 pp22.2%±1.4 pp13,028 ±794
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	65.9% ±4.4 pp14.6%±1.0 pp8,589 ±574
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	34.1% ±4.1 pp7.6%±0.9 pp4,439 ±532
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	22.2%±1.4 pp22.2%±1.4 pp13,028±794	13.5%±0.2 pp13.5%±0.2 pp365,577±5,480	▲ +8.7%▲ +8.7%	2/50
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	65.9%±4.4 pp14.6%±1.0 pp8,589±574	83.0%±0.5 pp11.2%±0.1 pp303,520±1,897	▼ -17.1%▲ +3.4%	43/5015/50
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	34.1%±4.1 pp7.6%±0.9 pp4,439±532	17.0%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.1 pp62,057±2,247	▲ +17.1%▲ +5.3%	8/502/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 50
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	6.0% ±0.9 pp6.0%±0.9 pp3,477 ±516
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	44.4% ±5.6 pp2.7%±0.3 pp1,545 ±195
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	55.6% ±9.9 pp3.3%±0.6 pp1,932 ±346
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	56.8% ±5.6 pp3.4%±0.3 pp1,974 ±195
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	43.2% ±9.6 pp2.6%±0.6 pp1,502 ±332
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	6.0%±0.9 pp6.0%±0.9 pp3,477±516	7.4%±0.1 pp7.4%±0.1 pp201,851±4,036	▼ -1.5%▼ -1.5%	29/50
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	44.4%±5.6 pp2.7%±0.3 pp1,545±195	52.4%±0.7 pp3.9%±0.1 pp105,720±1,511	▼ -7.9%▼ -1.2%	39/5046/50
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	55.6%±9.9 pp3.3%±0.6 pp1,932±346	47.6%±1.2 pp3.5%±0.1 pp96,131±2,437	▲ +7.9%▼ -0.2%	12/5016/50
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	56.8%±5.6 pp3.4%±0.3 pp1,974±195	67.0%±1.0 pp5.0%±0.1 pp135,301±1,945	▼ -10.2%▼ -1.6%	41/5043/50
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	43.2%±9.6 pp2.6%±0.6 pp1,502±332	33.0%±1.2 pp2.5%±0.1 pp66,550±2,459	▲ +10.2%▲ +0.1%	10/5020/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category	Ward 50
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	13.8% ±5.4 pp2,087 ±817
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	2.1% ±2.1 pp71 ±71
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	13.8%±5.4 pp2,087±817	5.9%±0.5 pp—	▲ +8.0%	2/50
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	2.1%±2.1 pp71±71	5.4%±0.6 pp—	▼ -3.3%	44/50
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category	Ward 50
Owner-Occupied Households	53.8% ±3.3 pp10,183 ±625
Renter-Occupied Households	46.2% ±2.9 pp8,740 ±556
Owner-Occupied Residents	54.3% ±3.9 pp31,053 ±2,259
Renter-Occupied Residents	45.7% ±4.1 pp26,137 ±2,327
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Owner-Occupied Households	53.8%±3.3 pp10,183±625	46.0%±0.4 pp534,012±4,939	▲ +7.8%	16/50
Renter-Occupied Households	46.2%±2.9 pp8,740±556	54.0%±0.4 pp626,193±5,183	▼ -7.8%	35/50
Owner-Occupied Residents	54.3%±3.9 pp31,053±2,259	51.8%±0.5 pp1,377,219±13,574	▲ +2.5%	18/50
Renter-Occupied Residents	45.7%±4.1 pp26,137±2,327	48.2%±0.5 pp1,280,665±13,500	▼ -2.5%	33/50
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category	Ward 50
Median Year Moved In	2013±0.9 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later	4.6% ±1.6 pp864 ±297
Moved in 2020 to 2022	15.5% ±2.4 pp2,930 ±451
Moved in 2010 to 2019	43.2% ±4.1 pp8,165 ±768
Moved in 2000 to 2009	16.1% ±2.4 pp3,050 ±462
Moved in 1990 to 1999	8.5% ±1.7 pp1,601 ±317
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	12.1% ±2.4 pp2,284 ±446
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Moved In	2013±0.9 yr	2015±1.0 yr	▼ −2	25/50
Moved in 2023 or Later	4.6%±1.6 pp864±297	5.9%±0.2 pp68,884±2,742	▼ -1.4%	29/50
Moved in 2020 to 2022	15.5%±2.4 pp2,930±451	24.1%±0.4 pp279,417±5,059	▼ -8.6%	37/50
Moved in 2010 to 2019	43.2%±4.1 pp8,165±768	39.2%±0.5 pp455,125±5,772	▲ +4.0%	8/50
Moved in 2000 to 2009	16.1%±2.4 pp3,050±462	13.8%±0.3 pp160,353±3,324	▲ +2.3%	15/50
Moved in 1990 to 1999	8.5%±1.7 pp1,601±317	8.2%±0.2 pp95,243±2,390	▲ +0.3%	24/50
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	12.1%±2.4 pp2,284±446	8.7%±0.2 pp101,183±2,362	▲ +3.4%	17/50
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 50
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	9.9% ±1.9 pp9.9%±1.9 pp5,676 ±1,082
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	7.2% ±1.5 pp72.4%±6.2 pp4,109 ±859
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	0.2% ±0.1 pp1.6%±1.0 pp88 ±60
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	0.7% ±0.3 pp7.4%±3.2 pp422 ±197
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	1.8% ±1.2 pp18.6%±11.0 pp1,057 ±658
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	9.9%±1.9 pp9.9%±1.9 pp5,676±1,082	14.0%±0.3 pp14.0%±0.3 pp375,475±8,289	▼ -4.1%▼ -4.1%	32/50
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	7.2%±1.5 pp72.4%±6.2 pp4,109±859	9.8%±0.3 pp69.9%±1.0 pp262,365±6,953	▼ -2.6%▲ +2.5%	34/5031/50
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	0.2%±0.1 pp1.6%±1.0 pp88±60	0.8%±0.1 pp5.5%±0.4 pp20,552±1,626	▼ -0.6%▼ -3.9%	41/5042/50
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	0.7%±0.3 pp7.4%±3.2 pp422±197	2.5%±0.1 pp17.6%±0.7 pp65,936±2,918	▼ -1.7%▼ -10.1%	35/5038/50
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	1.8%±1.2 pp18.6%±11.0 pp1,057±658	1.0%±0.1 pp7.1%±0.8 pp26,622±3,040	▲ +0.9%▲ +11.5%	6/502/50
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 50
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	7.7% ±1.8 pp7.7%±1.8 pp1,572 ±365
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	1.9% ±1.0 pp25.4%±11.0 pp399 ±196
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.4% ±0.4 pp4.6%±5.0 pp73 ±81
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.6% ±0.6 pp7.5%±7.3 pp118 ±118
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	4.8% ±1.6 pp62.5%±15.8 pp982 ±337
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	4.4% ±2.1 pp4.4%±2.1 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	0.7% ±0.8 pp0.7%±0.8 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	7.7%±1.8 pp7.7%±1.8 pp1,572±365	9.1%±0.2 pp9.1%±0.2 pp116,849±2,682	▼ -1.5%▼ -1.5%	24/50
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	1.9%±1.0 pp25.4%±11.0 pp399±196	2.5%±0.1 pp27.1%±1.4 pp31,723±1,796	▼ -0.5%▼ -1.8%	27/5026/50
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.4%±0.4 pp4.6%±5.0 pp73±81	0.6%±0.1 pp6.0%±0.7 pp7,037±795	▼ -0.2%▼ -1.4%	31/5027/50
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.6%±0.6 pp7.5%±7.3 pp118±118	0.2%±0.0 pp2.4%±0.5 pp2,831±587	▲ +0.4%▲ +5.1%	4/504/50
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	4.8%±1.6 pp62.5%±15.8 pp982±337	5.9%±0.3 pp64.4%±2.5 pp75,258±3,387	▼ -1.1%▼ -1.9%	24/5029/50
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	4.4%±2.1 pp4.4%±2.1 pp—	4.8%±0.3 pp4.8%±0.3 pp—	▼ -0.4%▼ -0.4%	29/50
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	0.7%±0.8 pp0.7%±0.8 pp—	1.3%±0.1 pp1.3%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.6%▼ -0.6%	37/50
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category	Ward 50
Median Year Built	1951±1 yr
Pre-1940	33.8% ±3.6 pp6,915 ±728
1940-2009	64.8% ±3.9 pp13,262 ±793
2010+	1.4% ±0.7 pp294 ±145
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Built	1951±1 yr	1953±1 yr	▼ −2 yrs	21/50
Pre-1940	33.8%±3.6 pp6,915±728	38.8%±0.4 pp495,715±4,678	▼ -5.0%	34/50
1940-2009	64.8%±3.9 pp13,262±793	54.9%±0.6 pp700,698±7,435	▲ +9.9%	13/50
2010+	1.4%±0.7 pp294±145	6.3%±0.2 pp80,641±2,725	▼ -4.9%	43/50
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category	Ward 50
Population Density	21,813 /sq mi±1,443/sq mi
Single-Family Homes	30.8% ±2.3 pp6,304 ±471
Buildings With 2–4 Units	30.1% ±3.7 pp6,172 ±754
Buildings With 5–19 Units	22.0% ±2.7 pp4,499 ±554
Buildings With 20 or More Units	17.0% ±2.3 pp3,481 ±480
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Population Density	21,813 /sq mi±1,443/sq mi	11,721 /sq mi±26/sq mi	▲ +10,092 /sq mi	11/50
Single-Family Homes	30.8%±2.3 pp6,304±471	29.2%±0.3 pp372,679±3,989	▲ +1.6%	24/50
Buildings With 2–4 Units	30.1%±3.7 pp6,172±754	27.4%±0.4 pp349,976±4,957	▲ +2.7%	27/50
Buildings With 5–19 Units	22.0%±2.7 pp4,499±554	16.2%±0.3 pp206,420±4,124	▲ +5.8%	9/50
Buildings With 20 or More Units	17.0%±2.3 pp3,481±480	27.0%±0.3 pp344,543±4,438	▼ -10.0%	17/50
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category	Ward 50
Studio	2.2% ±0.9 pp448 ±194
1 Bedroom	15.2% ±2.3 pp3,119 ±474
2 Bedrooms	34.1% ±3.3 pp6,978 ±677
3 Bedrooms	33.6% ±3.3 pp6,883 ±668
4 Bedrooms	9.1% ±1.8 pp1,868 ±378
5 or More Bedrooms	5.7% ±1.2 pp1,176 ±247
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Studio	2.2%±0.9 pp448±194	7.5%±0.3 pp95,749±3,205	▼ -5.3%	42/50
1 Bedroom	15.2%±2.3 pp3,119±474	20.1%±0.4 pp257,271±4,939	▼ -4.9%	27/50
2 Bedrooms	34.1%±3.3 pp6,978±677	33.1%±0.3 pp422,866±4,221	▲ +1.0%	21/50
3 Bedrooms	33.6%±3.3 pp6,883±668	26.1%±0.3 pp333,682±4,061	▲ +7.5%	15/50
4 Bedrooms	9.1%±1.8 pp1,868±378	9.0%±0.2 pp115,453±2,426	▲ +0.1%	26/50
5 or More Bedrooms	5.7%±1.2 pp1,176±247	4.1%±0.2 pp52,033±2,072	▲ +1.7%	16/50
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 50
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	8.5% ±2.3 pp8.5%±2.3 pp1,598 ±430
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	6.1% ±1.9 pp72.7%±12.2 pp1,162 ±368
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	2.3% ±1.2 pp27.3%±12.2 pp436 ±228
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	8.5%±2.3 pp8.5%±2.3 pp1,598±430	3.4%±0.2 pp3.4%±0.2 pp39,979±1,996	▲ +5.0%▲ +5.0%	3/50
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	6.1%±1.9 pp72.7%±12.2 pp1,162±368	2.0%±0.1 pp58.2%±2.3 pp23,276±1,493	▲ +4.1%▲ +14.5%	2/5011/50
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	2.3%±1.2 pp27.3%±12.2 pp436±228	1.4%±0.1 pp41.8%±2.6 pp16,703±1,328	▲ +0.9%▼ -14.5%	8/5040/50
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category	Ward 50
Natural Gas Heat	80.6% ±2.9 pp15,226 ±548
Electric Heat	13.9% ±2.1 pp2,622 ±406
Other Heating Source	5.5% ±1.9 pp1,048 ±353
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Natural Gas Heat	80.6%±2.9 pp15,226±548	77.5%±0.3 pp899,660±3,501	▲ +3.0%	34/50
Electric Heat	13.9%±2.1 pp2,622±406	18.0%±0.3 pp208,937±3,864	▼ -4.1%	16/50
Other Heating Source	5.5%±1.9 pp1,048±353	4.4%±0.2 pp51,603±2,173	▲ +1.1%	14/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show

Category	Ward 50
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	40.5% ±3.8 pp7,646 ±724
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	19.0% ±2.6 pp3,595 ±492
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	40.5% ±3.3 pp7,656 ±628
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	21.0% ±2.8 pp3,968 ±532
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	26.3% ±5.7 pp2,086 ±451
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	20.3% ±4.0 pp1,607 ±316
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	53.4% ±5.3 pp4,238 ±423
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	29.2% ±5.1 pp2,312 ±405
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	51.4% ±5.0 pp5,239 ±511
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	17.9% ±3.4 pp1,827 ±351
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	30.6% ±3.9 pp3,120 ±394
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	14.8% ±2.9 pp1,503 ±295
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	41.2% ±7.2 pp2,382 ±419
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	21.7% ±5.1 pp1,256 ±293
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	37.1% ±5.0 pp2,145 ±291
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	16.6% ±3.5 pp961 ±203
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage and a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	64.9% ±6.5 pp2,857 ±286
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	13.0% ±4.2 pp570 ±185
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	22.1% ±5.7 pp975 ±252
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	12.3% ±4.8 pp542 ±213
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage and with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	40.5%±3.8 pp7,646±724	24.9%±0.4 pp289,047±4,524	▲ +15.5%	21/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	19.0%±2.6 pp3,595±492	23.8%±0.4 pp276,514±4,291	▼ -4.8%	38/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	40.5%±3.3 pp7,656±628	45.6%±0.5 pp529,378±5,291	▼ -5.1%	21/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	21.0%±2.8 pp3,968±532	24.0%±0.4 pp278,684±4,167	▼ -3.0%	21/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	26.3%±5.7 pp2,086±451	26.4%±0.5 pp155,936±3,134	▼ -0.1%	28/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	20.3%±4.0 pp1,607±316	25.3%±0.5 pp149,215±2,939	▼ -5.0%	38/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	53.4%±5.3 pp4,238±423	48.3%±0.7 pp285,567±4,222	▲ +5.1%	20/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	29.2%±5.1 pp2,312±405	25.5%±0.6 pp150,346±3,554	▲ +3.7%	19/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	51.4%±5.0 pp5,239±511	51.6%±0.6 pp272,277±2,904	▼ -0.1%	23/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	17.9%±3.4 pp1,827±351	19.6%±0.5 pp103,661±2,759	▼ -1.7%	33/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	30.6%±3.9 pp3,120±394	28.8%±0.6 pp151,994±3,034	▲ +1.8%	21/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	14.8%±2.9 pp1,503±295	13.8%±0.4 pp73,053±2,233	▲ +0.9%	20/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	41.2%±7.2 pp2,382±419	42.8%±0.7 pp146,216±2,365	▼ -1.6%	23/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	21.7%±5.1 pp1,256±293	23.9%±0.7 pp81,659±2,408	▼ -2.2%	34/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	37.1%±5.0 pp2,145±291	33.3%±0.8 pp113,882±2,596	▲ +3.8%	20/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	16.6%±3.5 pp961±203	15.4%±0.5 pp52,632±1,873	▲ +1.2%	21/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage and a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	64.9%±6.5 pp2,857±286	67.7%±0.9 pp126,058±1,613	▼ -2.8%	34/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	13.0%±4.2 pp570±185	11.8%±0.7 pp22,000±1,275	▲ +1.1%	19/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	22.1%±5.7 pp975±252	20.5%±0.8 pp38,106±1,492	▲ +1.7%	20/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	12.3%±4.8 pp542±213	11.0%±0.6 pp20,421±1,202	▲ +1.3%	16/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage and with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category	Ward 50
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$501±$85
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$987±$53
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$1,446±$54
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$2,100±$108
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$2,932±$87
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$501±$85	$594±$11	▼ −$93	35/50
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$987±$53	$1,011±$8	▼ −$24	25/50
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$1,446±$54	$1,560±$10	▼ −$114	25/50
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$2,100±$108	$2,329±$13	▼ −$230	24/50
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$2,932±$87	Over $3,000	▼ −$68+	24/50
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$641 ±59	$654 ±62	$501 ±85	▼ −$139▼ −$153▲ +$14
Chicago citywide	$609 ±7	$606 ±7	$594 ±11	▼ −$15▼ −$12▼ −$2
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$484 ±45	$533 ±51	$501 ±85	▲ +$18▼ −$32▲ +$50
Chicago citywide	$459 ±6	$494 ±6	$594 ±11	▲ +$135▲ +$100▲ +$35
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,021 ±34	$1,114 ±37	$987 ±53	▼ −$34▼ −$127▲ +$93
Chicago citywide	$992 ±5	$1,001 ±5	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$19▲ +$10▲ +$9
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$771 ±25	$908 ±30	$987 ±53	▲ +$216▲ +$79▲ +$137
Chicago citywide	$748 ±3	$816 ±4	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$262▲ +$195▲ +$67
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,462 ±57	$1,520 ±32	$1,446 ±54	▼ −$16▼ −$74▲ +$59
Chicago citywide	$1,493 ±8	$1,523 ±6	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$67▲ +$37▲ +$29
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,103 ±43	$1,239 ±26	$1,446 ±54	▲ +$343▲ +$207▲ +$136
Chicago citywide	$1,127 ±6	$1,241 ±5	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$433▲ +$319▲ +$114
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,230 ±101	$2,102 ±83	$2,100 ±108	▼ −$130▼ −$2▼ −$128
Chicago citywide	$2,333 ±12	$2,326 ±10	$2,329 ±13	▼ −$4▲ +$3▼ −$7
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,683 ±76	$1,713 ±67	$2,100 ±108	▲ +$417▲ +$387▲ +$30
Chicago citywide	$1,761 ±9	$1,896 ±8	$2,329 ±13	▲ +$569▲ +$434▲ +$135
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$3,092 ±136	$2,932 ±87	—▼ −$160—
Chicago citywide	—	$3,316 ±20	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$2,520 ±111	$2,932 ±87	—▲ +$412—
Chicago citywide	—	$2,703 ±16	—	———

Rent

Rent measure

Category	Ward 50
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$1,550±$119
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$922±$100
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,185±$74
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$1,471±$57
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,835±$57
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$2,222±$162
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$1,550±$119	$1,613±$12	▼ −$62	14/50
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$922±$100	$696±$20	▲ +$226	14/50
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,185±$74	$1,043±$8	▲ +$143	11/50
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$1,471±$57	$1,440±$10	▲ +$31	16/50
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,835±$57	$2,021±$21	▼ −$186	22/50
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$2,222±$162	$2,738±$29	▼ −$516	24/50
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50
Average Rent	$1,331±$54
10th Percentile Rent	$827±$123
25th Percentile Rent	$1,062±$49
Median Rent	$1,327±$45
75th Percentile Rent	$1,629±$102
90th Percentile Rent	$1,960±$92
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent	$1,331±$54	$1,452±$11	▼ −$121	22/50
10th Percentile Rent	$827±$123	$564±$21	▲ +$263	12/50
25th Percentile Rent	$1,062±$49	$913±$7	▲ +$149	13/50
Median Rent	$1,327±$45	$1,262±$12	▲ +$65	15/50
75th Percentile Rent	$1,629±$102	$1,868±$13	▼ −$239	22/50
90th Percentile Rent	$1,960±$92	$2,528±$38	▼ −$568	23/50
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category	Ward 50
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,539±$412
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,136±$163
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,681±$194
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,374±$134
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$3,152±$182
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$3,861±$150
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,539±$412	$2,734±$24	▼ −$194	22/50
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,136±$163	$1,270±$14	▼ −$134	35/50
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,681±$194	$1,697±$14	▼ −$16	28/50
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,374±$134	$2,339±$17	▲ +$35	22/50
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$3,152±$182	$3,269±$31	▼ −$117	23/50
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$3,861±$150	Over $4,000	▼ −$139+	24/50
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,806 ±38	$2,771 ±35	$2,539 ±412	▼ −$267▼ −$232▼ −$35
Chicago citywide	$2,855 ±19	$2,793 ±23	$2,734 ±24	▼ −$121▼ −$60▼ −$61
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$2,118 ±29	$2,258 ±29	$2,539 ±412	▲ +$422▲ +$281▲ +$141
Chicago citywide	$2,154 ±14	$2,277 ±19	$2,734 ±24	▲ +$579▲ +$457▲ +$122
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,436 ±105	$1,397 ±79	$1,136 ±163	▼ −$300▼ −$261▼ −$39
Chicago citywide	$1,403 ±11	$1,356 ±11	$1,270 ±14	▼ −$133▼ −$86▼ −$47
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,084 ±79	$1,138 ±65	$1,136 ±163	▲ +$53▼ −$2▲ +$55
Chicago citywide	$1,059 ±8	$1,105 ±9	$1,270 ±14	▲ +$212▲ +$165▲ +$46
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,948 ±114	$1,800 ±115	$1,681 ±194	▼ −$267▼ −$119▼ −$148
Chicago citywide	$1,874 ±12	$1,800 ±12	$1,697 ±14	▼ −$177▼ −$103▼ −$74
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,470 ±86	$1,467 ±94	$1,681 ±194	▲ +$211▲ +$214▼ −$3
Chicago citywide	$1,414 ±9	$1,467 ±10	$1,697 ±14	▲ +$283▲ +$230▲ +$53
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,703 ±117	$2,502 ±131	$2,374 ±134	▼ −$329▼ −$128▼ −$201
Chicago citywide	$2,526 ±13	$2,422 ±13	$2,339 ±17	▼ −$187▼ −$83▼ −$103
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$2,040 ±88	$2,039 ±107	$2,374 ±134	▲ +$334▲ +$335▼ −$1
Chicago citywide	$1,906 ±10	$1,974 ±11	$2,339 ±17	▲ +$433▲ +$365▲ +$68
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$3,462 ±143	$3,321 ±141	$3,152 ±182	▼ −$310▼ −$169▼ −$141
Chicago citywide	$3,447 ±25	$3,343 ±25	$3,269 ±31	▼ −$178▼ −$74▼ −$104
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$2,613 ±108	$2,706 ±115	$3,152 ±182	▲ +$539▲ +$446▲ +$94
Chicago citywide	$2,601 ±19	$2,724 ±20	$3,269 ±31	▲ +$668▲ +$544▲ +$123
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$4,044 ±169	$3,861 ±150	—▼ −$184—
Chicago citywide	—	$4,578 ±59	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	—	$3,296 ±137	$3,861 ±150	—▲ +$564—
Chicago citywide	—	$3,731 ±48	—	———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category	Ward 50
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$904±$159
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$305±$111
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$537±$99
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$896±$96
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,201±$83
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	Over $1,500
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$904±$159	$1,078±$22	▼ −$174	26/50
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$305±$111	$418±$8	▼ −$113	48/50
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$537±$99	$601±$8	▼ −$64	36/50
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$896±$96	$859±$10	▲ +$37	22/50
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,201±$83	$1,197±$18	▲ +$3	18/50
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	Over $1,500	Over $1,500	—	1/50
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$938 ±47	$997 ±38	$904 ±159	▼ −$34▼ −$93▲ +$60
Chicago citywide	$957 ±15	$1,028 ±10	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$121▲ +$50▲ +$71
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$708 ±35	$813 ±31	$904 ±159	▲ +$196▲ +$91▲ +$105
Chicago citywide	$722 ±11	$838 ±8	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$355▲ +$240▲ +$116
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$496 ±66	$487 ±77	$305 ±111	▼ −$191▼ −$182▼ −$9
Chicago citywide	$429 ±6	$469 ±7	$418 ±8	▼ −$11▼ −$51▲ +$40
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$374 ±50	$397 ±63	$305 ±111	▼ −$69▼ −$92▲ +$23
Chicago citywide	$324 ±5	$382 ±5	$418 ±8	▲ +$95▲ +$36▲ +$59
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$679 ±51	$702 ±55	$537 ±99	▼ −$142▼ −$166▲ +$24
Chicago citywide	$586 ±6	$629 ±6	$601 ±8	▲ +$14▼ −$28▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$512 ±38	$572 ±45	$537 ±99	▲ +$25▼ −$36▲ +$60
Chicago citywide	$442 ±4	$513 ±5	$601 ±8	▲ +$158▲ +$88▲ +$70
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$923 ±42	$943 ±53	$896 ±96	▼ −$27▼ −$47▲ +$21
Chicago citywide	$815 ±9	$860 ±7	$859 ±10	▲ +$44▼ −$1▲ +$45
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$696 ±32	$769 ±43	$896 ±96	▲ +$200▲ +$127▲ +$72
Chicago citywide	$615 ±7	$701 ±6	$859 ±10	▲ +$244▲ +$158▲ +$86
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$1,302 ±79	$1,201 ±83	—▼ −$102—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,206 ±14	$1,197 ±18	—▼ −$9—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$1,061 ±65	$1,201 ±83	—▲ +$139—
Chicago citywide	—	$983 ±12	$1,197 ±18	—▲ +$214—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$1,554 ±75	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	$1,767 ±35	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$1,266 ±61	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	$1,440 ±28	—	———

Home Values

Category	Ward 50
Average Home Value	$391,737±$15,612
10th Percentile Home Value	$102,374±$33,601
25th Percentile Home Value	$190,464±$18,878
Median Home Value	$353,274±$29,565
75th Percentile Home Value	$528,533±$42,706
90th Percentile Home Value	$732,584±$43,613
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Average Home Value	$391,737±$15,612	$437,638±$7,358	▼ −$45,901	25/50
10th Percentile Home Value	$102,374±$33,601	$129,150±$3,756	▼ −$26,777	36/50
25th Percentile Home Value	$190,464±$18,878	$217,800±$1,804	▼ −$27,336	34/50
Median Home Value	$353,274±$29,565	$334,100±$2,424	▲ +$19,174	23/50
75th Percentile Home Value	$528,533±$42,706	$497,700±$3,730	▲ +$30,833	20/50
90th Percentile Home Value	$732,584±$43,613	$809,159±$15,691	▼ −$76,575	19/50
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$362,262 ±13,539	$379,579 ±10,113	$391,737 ±15,612	▲ +$29,475▲ +$12,158▲ +$17,317
Chicago citywide	$386,614 ±5,106	$424,380 ±4,754	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$51,024▲ +$13,258▲ +$37,766
Average Home Value (nominal dollars)	$273,394 ±10,218	$309,358 ±8,242	$391,737 ±15,612	▲ +$118,344▲ +$82,380▲ +$35,964
Chicago citywide	$291,771 ±3,853	$345,871 ±3,874	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$145,867▲ +$91,768▲ +$54,099
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$110,394 ±17,764	$125,023 ±12,083	$102,374 ±33,601	▼ −$8,021▼ −$22,649▲ +$14,629
Chicago citywide	$115,330 ±1,421	$124,313 ±1,339	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$13,821▲ +$4,838▲ +$8,983
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$83,313 ±13,406	$101,894 ±9,847	$102,374 ±33,601	▲ +$19,061▲ +$480▲ +$18,581
Chicago citywide	$87,037 ±1,072	$101,315 ±1,091	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$42,113▲ +$27,835▲ +$14,278
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$205,274 ±18,736	$208,471 ±19,621	$190,464 ±18,878	▼ −$14,810▼ −$18,007▲ +$3,197
Chicago citywide	$190,543 ±2,400	$199,018 ±1,255	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$27,257▲ +$18,782▲ +$8,475
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$154,917 ±14,139	$169,904 ±15,991	$190,464 ±18,878	▲ +$35,547▲ +$20,560▲ +$14,987
Chicago citywide	$143,800 ±1,811	$162,200 ±1,023	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$74,000▲ +$55,600▲ +$18,400
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$362,102 ±21,451	$372,164 ±17,619	$353,274 ±29,565	▼ −$8,828▼ −$18,889▲ +$10,062
Chicago citywide	$299,066 ±2,120	$316,564 ±2,118	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$35,034▲ +$17,536▲ +$17,498
Median Home Value (nominal dollars)	$273,272 ±16,188	$303,314 ±14,360	$353,274 ±29,565	▲ +$80,002▲ +$49,960▲ +$30,042
Chicago citywide	$225,700 ±1,600	$258,000 ±1,726	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$108,400▲ +$76,100▲ +$32,300
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$497,712 ±14,178	$495,210 ±18,338	$528,533 ±42,706	▲ +$30,821▲ +$33,323▼ −$2,502
Chicago citywide	$466,951 ±3,138	$490,797 ±3,892	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$30,749▲ +$6,903▲ +$23,846
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$375,615 ±10,700	$403,597 ±14,946	$528,533 ±42,706	▲ +$152,918▲ +$124,936▲ +$27,982
Chicago citywide	$352,400 ±2,368	$400,000 ±3,172	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$145,300▲ +$97,700▲ +$47,600
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$626,386 ±22,673	$616,627 ±45,740	$732,584 ±43,613	▲ +$106,198▲ +$115,957▼ −$9,759
Chicago citywide	$739,174 ±12,945	$835,769 ±9,047	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$69,986▼ −$26,610▲ +$96,595
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$472,724 ±17,111	$502,552 ±37,278	$732,584 ±43,613	▲ +$259,861▲ +$230,032▲ +$29,829
Chicago citywide	$557,842 ±9,770	$681,153 ±7,373	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$251,317▲ +$128,006▲ +$123,311

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 50
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	5.6%5.6%1,152
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	3.8%66.8%770
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.3%6.2%72
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	1.4%25.3%292
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.1%1.6%18
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	5.6%5.6%1,152	8.3%8.3%106,578	▼ -2.7%▼ -2.7%	24/50
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	3.8%66.8%770	4.8%57.2%60,910	▼ -1.0%▲ +9.7%	22/5023/50
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.3%6.2%72	1.1%13.8%14,721	▼ -0.8%▼ -7.6%	26/5029/50
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	1.4%25.3%292	2.1%25.7%27,383	▼ -0.7%▼ -0.3%	21/5019/50
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.1%1.6%18	0.3%3.3%3,564	▼ -0.2%▼ -1.8%	25/5028/50
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units	5.0%983	5.0%997	5.6%1,152	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +169▲ +0.6 pp▲ +155– 0.0 pp▲ +14
Chicago citywide	8.8%104,550	8.5%103,479	8.3%106,578	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,028▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,099▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,071
Housing Choice Vouchers	2.5%491	3.2%631	3.8%770	▲ +1.2 pp▲ +279▲ +0.6 pp▲ +139▲ +0.7 pp▲ +140
Chicago citywide	4.3%51,601	4.6%55,987	4.8%60,910	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +9,309▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,923▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,386
Public Housing	0.9%184	0.3%57	0.4%72	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −112▲ +0.1 pp▲ +15▼ −0.7 pp▼ −127
Chicago citywide	1.8%21,159	1.3%16,094	1.2%14,721	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −6,438▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,373▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,065
Project-Based Section 8	1.5%290	1.5%292	1.4%292	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▲ +2
Chicago citywide	2.2%25,940	2.2%26,951	2.1%27,383	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,443▼ −0.1 pp▲ +432– 0.0 pp▲ +1,011
Other Project-Based Programs	0.1%18	0.1%18	0.1%18	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,850	0.4%4,447	0.3%3,564	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,286▼ −0.1 pp▼ −883▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,403

Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category	Ward 50
Average Household Income	$18,158
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$436
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,252
Below 30% of Area Median Income	83.8%852
With Children	22.1%225
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	26.9%273
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this ward. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this ward. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this ward.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$18,158	$17,032	▲ +$1,126	14/50
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$436	$425	▲ +$12	20/50
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,252	$1,389	▼ -$137	46/50
Below 30% of Area Median Income	83.8%852	83.0%77,427	▲ +0.8 pp	18/50
With Children	22.1%225	31.0%28,919	▼ -8.9 pp	36/50
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	26.9%273	32.0%29,852	▼ -5.1 pp	45/50
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this ward. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this ward. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this ward.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income	$12,486	$14,205	$18,174	▲ +$5,688▲ +$3,969▲ +$1,719
Chicago citywide	$12,156	$13,665	$17,032	▲ +$4,876▲ +$3,367▲ +$1,509
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$312	$336	$437	▲ +$125▲ +$101▲ +$24
Chicago citywide	$310	$340	$425	▲ +$115▲ +$85▲ +$30
Average Monthly Government Spending	$838	$883	$1,255	▲ +$417▲ +$371▲ +$45
Chicago citywide	$916	$1,017	$1,389	▲ +$473▲ +$372▲ +$101
Below 30% of Area Median Income	83.9%—	84.7%—	83.8%—	▼ −0.1 pp—▼ −1.0 pp—▲ +0.9 pp—
Chicago citywide	80.0%—	81.0%—	83.0%—	▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +2.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children	—	—	22.2%—	——————
Chicago citywide	—	—	31.0%—	——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	26.4%—	27.9%—	27.0%—	▲ +0.7 pp—▼ −0.9 pp—▲ +1.5 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category	Ward 50
Total Tree Canopy	23.1%405 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	63.3%1,109 acres
Natural Open Surfaces	13.6%238 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Total Tree Canopy	23.1%405 acres	18.4%25,934 acres	▲ +4.7%	12/50
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	63.3%1,109 acres	60.2%84,955 acres	▲ +3.2%	30/50
Natural Open Surfaces	13.6%238 acres	21.5%30,331 acres	▼ -7.9%	29/50
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category	Ward 50
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	25.5% ±3.8 pp14,851 ±2,206
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	43.2% ±4.1 pp25,160 ±2,374
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	31.3% ±3.6 pp18,241 ±2,080
Homes Without Air Conditioning	4.3%2,484
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	25.5%±3.8 pp14,851±2,206	26.1%±0.5 pp708,175±13,883	▼ -0.6%	25/50
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	43.2%±4.1 pp25,160±2,374	44.1%±0.6 pp1,195,501±15,477	▼ -0.9%	27/50
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	31.3%±3.6 pp18,241±2,080	29.8%±0.5 pp807,550±13,776	▲ +1.5%	21/50
Homes Without Air Conditioning	4.3%2,484	4.2%114,618	0%	24/50
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category	Ward 50
Drove Alone	67.2% ±4.6 pp13,686 ±930
Carpooled	12.1% ±2.6 pp2,473 ±529
Public Transit	12.2% ±2.4 pp2,492 ±488
Walked	4.8% ±1.3 pp971 ±275
Bikes	1.1% ±0.7 pp233 ±143
Other Commute Mode	1.3% ±0.8 pp260 ±157
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Drove Alone	67.2%±4.6 pp13,686±930	56.6%±0.4 pp772,696±5,998	▲ +10.6%	10/50
Carpooled	12.1%±2.6 pp2,473±529	9.3%±0.3 pp126,918±3,980	▲ +2.8%	12/50
Public Transit	12.2%±2.4 pp2,492±488	22.4%±0.4 pp305,691±6,011	▼ -10.2%	43/50
Walked	4.8%±1.3 pp971±275	7.3%±0.3 pp100,269±3,456	▼ -2.6%	23/50
Bikes	1.1%±0.7 pp233±143	1.8%±0.1 pp24,441±1,693	▼ -0.6%	28/50
Other Commute Mode	1.3%±0.8 pp260±157	2.5%±0.1 pp34,356±1,772	▼ -1.2%	24/50
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category	Ward 50
Average Commute Time (minutes)	30 min±1.6 min
Less Than 15 Minutes	22.4% ±2.6 pp4,520 ±529
15–29 Minutes	29.4% ±4.3 pp5,921 ±871
30–44 Minutes	24.1% ±3.2 pp4,859 ±647
45–59 Minutes	10.7% ±1.8 pp2,163 ±368
60 Minutes or More	13.3% ±2.4 pp2,682 ±476
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes)	30 min±1.6 min	33 min±0.2 min	▼ −3 min	39/50
Less Than 15 Minutes	22.4%±2.6 pp4,520±529	13.0%±0.3 pp140,252±3,438	▲ +9.4%	3/50
15–29 Minutes	29.4%±4.3 pp5,921±871	29.9%±0.5 pp322,586±5,056	▼ -0.5%	17/50
30–44 Minutes	24.1%±3.2 pp4,859±647	29.6%±0.4 pp318,782±4,584	▼ -5.5%	43/50
45–59 Minutes	10.7%±1.8 pp2,163±368	14.0%±0.3 pp151,451±3,075	▼ -3.3%	42/50
60 Minutes or More	13.3%±2.4 pp2,682±476	13.4%±0.3 pp144,940±3,715	▼ -0.1%	24/50
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category	Ward 50
Average Vehicles per Household	1.39±0.10
Households With No Vehicle	15.6% ±2.3 pp2,945 ±431
Households With 1 Vehicle	42.4% ±2.9 pp8,011 ±543
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	42.0% ±3.9 pp7,940 ±737
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Average Vehicles per Household	1.39±0.10	1.12±0.01	▲ +0.27	14/50
Households With No Vehicle	15.6%±2.3 pp2,945±431	26.6%±0.4 pp308,497±5,087	▼ -11.0%	38/50
Households With 1 Vehicle	42.4%±2.9 pp8,011±543	45.2%±0.4 pp524,900±5,145	▼ -2.8%	32/50
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	42.0%±3.9 pp7,940±737	28.2%±0.4 pp326,808±4,200	▲ +13.9%	13/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Ward 50 Residents Work

Category	Ward 50
Loop	13.1%2,830
Near North Side	6.2%1,352
West Ridge	5.7%1,233
Near West Side	3.7%797
Rogers Park	2.3%503
All other city neighborhoods	22.0%4,773
Outside the city	47.0%10,188
↳ Skokie village, IL	6.4%1,388
↳ Evanston city, IL	4.5%974
↳ Lincolnwood village, IL	2.2%479
↳ Niles village, IL	1.7%368
↳ Des Plaines city, IL	1.3%272
↳ All other Illinois locations	28.5%6,177
Out of state	2.4%530
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for ward 50 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference
Loop	13.1%2,830	21.5%259,168	▼ -8.5%
Near North Side	6.2%1,352	9.1%109,334	▼ -2.8%
West Ridge	5.7%1,233	0.5%6,428	▲ +5.2%
Near West Side	3.7%797	6.7%80,119	▼ -3.0%
Rogers Park	2.3%503	0.6%7,134	▲ +1.7%
All other city neighborhoods	22.0%4,773	21.1%253,663	▲ +1.0%
Outside the city	47.0%10,188	35.9%432,365	▲ +11.1%
↳ Skokie village, IL	6.4%1,388	1.3%15,779	▲ +5.1%
↳ Evanston city, IL	4.5%974	1.5%17,547	▲ +3.0%
↳ Lincolnwood village, IL	2.2%479	0.4%4,923	▲ +1.8%
↳ Niles village, IL	1.7%368	0.6%6,892	▲ +1.1%
↳ Des Plaines city, IL	1.3%272	0.8%9,268	▲ +0.5%
↳ All other Illinois locations	28.5%6,177	27.4%330,297	▲ +1.1%
Out of state	2.4%530	2.2%26,136	▲ +0.3%
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for ward 50 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Loop	12.8%2,715	13.4%2,915	13.1%2,830	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +115▼ −0.4 pp▼ −85▲ +0.7 pp▲ +200
Chicago citywide	20.0%224,635	21.0%252,791	21.5%259,168	▲ +1.5 pp▲ +34,533▲ +0.5 pp▲ +6,377▲ +1.0 pp▲ +28,156
Near North Side	5.8%1,229	6.5%1,414	6.2%1,352	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +123▼ −0.3 pp▼ −62▲ +0.7 pp▲ +185
Chicago citywide	8.2%92,142	9.4%112,858	9.1%109,334	▲ +0.9 pp▲ +17,192▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3,524▲ +1.2 pp▲ +20,716
West Ridge	5.7%1,224	6.0%1,305	5.7%1,233	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +9▼ −0.3 pp▼ −72▲ +0.3 pp▲ +81
Chicago citywide	0.6%6,219	0.5%6,151	0.5%6,428	– 0.0 pp▲ +209– 0.0 pp▲ +277– 0.0 pp▼ −68
Near West Side	3.4%725	4.0%864	3.7%797	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +72▼ −0.3 pp▼ −67▲ +0.6 pp▲ +139
Chicago citywide	6.2%69,083	6.6%79,757	6.7%80,119	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +11,036– 0.0 pp▲ +362▲ +0.5 pp▲ +10,674
Rogers Park	2.9%613	2.4%513	2.3%503	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −110– 0.0 pp▼ −10▼ −0.5 pp▼ −100
Chicago citywide	0.6%6,788	0.6%7,066	0.6%7,134	– 0.0 pp▲ +346– 0.0 pp▲ +68– 0.0 pp▲ +278
All other city neighborhoods	22.1%4,711	22.9%4,968	22.0%4,773	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +62▼ −0.8 pp▼ −195▲ +0.7 pp▲ +257
Chicago citywide	22.9%257,015	21.5%259,132	21.1%253,663	▼ −1.8 pp▼ −3,352▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,469▼ −1.4 pp▲ +2,117
Outside the city	47.3%10,076	44.9%9,753	47.0%10,188	▼ −0.3 pp▲ +112▲ +2.1 pp▲ +435▼ −2.4 pp▼ −323
Chicago citywide	36.8%412,807	35.7%430,135	35.9%432,365	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +19,558▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,230▼ −1.0 pp▲ +17,328
Skokie village, IL	5.5%1,174	5.8%1,261	6.4%1,388	▲ +0.9 pp▲ +214▲ +0.6 pp▲ +127▲ +0.3 pp▲ +87
Chicago citywide	1.1%12,426	1.1%12,901	1.3%15,779	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +3,353▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,878– 0.0 pp▲ +475
Evanston city, IL	4.4%942	4.7%1,014	4.5%974	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +32▼ −0.2 pp▼ −40▲ +0.2 pp▲ +72
Chicago citywide	1.6%17,922	1.6%18,922	1.5%17,547	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −375▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,375– 0.0 pp▲ +1,000
Lincolnwood village, IL	1.4%305	1.7%373	2.2%479	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +174▲ +0.5 pp▲ +106▲ +0.3 pp▲ +68
Chicago citywide	0.3%3,718	0.4%4,392	0.4%4,923	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,205– 0.0 pp▲ +531– 0.0 pp▲ +674
Niles village, IL	1.1%243	1.5%329	1.7%368	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +125▲ +0.2 pp▲ +39▲ +0.4 pp▲ +86
Chicago citywide	0.6%6,284	0.6%6,624	0.6%6,892	– 0.0 pp▲ +608– 0.0 pp▲ +268– 0.0 pp▲ +340
Des Plaines city, IL	1.1%239	1.4%307	1.3%272	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +33▼ −0.2 pp▼ −35▲ +0.3 pp▲ +68
Chicago citywide	0.8%9,241	0.8%9,141	0.8%9,268	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +27– 0.0 pp▲ +127▼ −0.1 pp▼ −100
All other Illinois locations	30.5%6,497	27.4%5,949	28.5%6,177	▼ −2.0 pp▼ −320▲ +1.1 pp▲ +228▼ −3.1 pp▼ −548
Chicago citywide	28.0%314,112	27.1%326,235	27.4%330,297	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +16,185▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,062▼ −0.9 pp▲ +12,123
Out of state	2.8%593	2.4%520	2.4%530	▼ −0.3 pp▼ −63▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10▼ −0.4 pp▼ −73
Chicago citywide	2.2%24,577	2.3%27,198	2.2%26,136	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,559▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,062▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,621

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Ward 50

Category	Ward 50
West Ridge	12.4%1,316
Rogers Park	3.0%322
Edgewater	1.7%185
Lake View	1.7%176
Lincoln Square	1.4%150
All other city neighborhoods	26.3%2,803
Outside the city	53.5%5,692
↳ Skokie village, IL	5.7%607
↳ Morton Grove village, IL	1.7%179
↳ Lincolnwood village, IL	1.6%168
↳ Niles village, IL	1.5%161
↳ Evanston city, IL	1.5%156
↳ All other Illinois locations	39.7%4,226
Out of state	1.8%195
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in ward 50; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference
West Ridge	12.4%1,316	1.1%16,381	▲ +11.2%
Rogers Park	3.0%322	1.0%14,965	▲ +2.0%
Edgewater	1.7%185	1.3%19,319	▲ +0.4%
Lake View	1.7%176	3.1%44,776	▼ -1.4%
Lincoln Square	1.4%150	1.0%14,898	▲ +0.4%
All other city neighborhoods	26.3%2,803	37.1%542,952	▼ -10.8%
Outside the city	53.5%5,692	47.2%691,556	▲ +6.2%
↳ Skokie village, IL	5.7%607	0.9%12,545	▲ +4.8%
↳ Morton Grove village, IL	1.7%179	0.3%4,425	▲ +1.4%
↳ Lincolnwood village, IL	1.6%168	0.2%2,966	▲ +1.4%
↳ Niles village, IL	1.5%161	0.3%4,639	▲ +1.2%
↳ Evanston city, IL	1.5%156	0.9%13,044	▲ +0.6%
↳ All other Illinois locations	39.7%4,226	37.0%540,957	▲ +2.7%
Out of state	1.8%195	4.9%72,124	▼ -3.1%
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in ward 50; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
West Ridge	13.0%1,183	13.3%1,347	12.4%1,316	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +133▼ −0.9 pp▼ −31▲ +0.3 pp▲ +164
Chicago citywide	1.2%15,893	1.2%16,926	1.1%16,381	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +488▼ −0.1 pp▼ −545– 0.0 pp▲ +1,033
Rogers Park	3.2%295	2.6%261	3.0%322	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +27▲ +0.4 pp▲ +61▼ −0.7 pp▼ −34
Chicago citywide	1.1%14,602	1.1%15,644	1.0%14,965	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +363▼ −0.1 pp▼ −679– 0.0 pp▲ +1,042
Edgewater	2.8%259	2.2%222	1.7%185	▼ −1.1 pp▼ −74▼ −0.5 pp▼ −37▼ −0.7 pp▼ −37
Chicago citywide	1.4%18,970	1.4%19,919	1.3%19,319	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +349▼ −0.1 pp▼ −600– 0.0 pp▲ +949
Lake View	1.8%161	1.6%165	1.7%176	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +15– 0.0 pp▲ +11▼ −0.1 pp▲ +4
Chicago citywide	3.2%41,852	3.2%45,855	3.1%44,776	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,924▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,079▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,003
Lincoln Square	1.9%172	1.8%186	1.4%150	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −22▼ −0.4 pp▼ −36▼ −0.1 pp▲ +14
Chicago citywide	1.1%14,848	1.1%15,309	1.0%14,898	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +50▼ −0.1 pp▼ −411– 0.0 pp▲ +461
All other city neighborhoods	28.8%2,624	25.7%2,599	26.3%2,803	▼ −2.5 pp▲ +179▲ +0.7 pp▲ +204▼ −3.2 pp▼ −25
Chicago citywide	38.3%503,539	38.2%541,560	37.1%542,952	▼ −1.2 pp▲ +39,413▼ −1.1 pp▲ +1,392▼ −0.1 pp▲ +38,021
Outside the city	48.3%4,395	52.8%5,346	53.5%5,692	▲ +5.2 pp▲ +1,297▲ +0.7 pp▲ +346▲ +4.5 pp▲ +951
Chicago citywide	45.9%603,753	45.4%642,891	47.2%691,556	▲ +1.3 pp▲ +87,803▲ +1.9 pp▲ +48,665▼ −0.6 pp▲ +39,138
Skokie village, IL	5.6%509	5.6%568	5.7%607	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +98▲ +0.1 pp▲ +39– 0.0 pp▲ +59
Chicago citywide	0.9%12,311	0.9%12,525	0.9%12,545	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +234– 0.0 pp▲ +20▼ −0.1 pp▲ +214
Morton Grove village, IL	1.4%129	1.8%179	1.7%179	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +50▼ −0.1 pp– 0▲ +0.4 pp▲ +50
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,363	0.3%4,368	0.3%4,425	– 0.0 pp▲ +62– 0.0 pp▲ +57– 0.0 pp▲ +5
Lincolnwood village, IL	1.3%121	1.4%143	1.6%168	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +47▲ +0.2 pp▲ +25▲ +0.1 pp▲ +22
Chicago citywide	0.2%2,944	0.2%2,878	0.2%2,966	– 0.0 pp▲ +22– 0.0 pp▲ +88– 0.0 pp▼ −66
Niles village, IL	1.6%144	1.5%149	1.5%161	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +17– 0.0 pp▲ +12▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,058	0.3%4,432	0.3%4,639	– 0.0 pp▲ +581– 0.0 pp▲ +207– 0.0 pp▲ +374
Evanston city, IL	1.9%169	1.9%191	1.5%156	▼ −0.4 pp▼ −13▼ −0.4 pp▼ −35– 0.0 pp▲ +22
Chicago citywide	0.9%12,386	0.9%13,410	0.9%13,044	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +658▼ −0.1 pp▼ −366– 0.0 pp▲ +1,024
All other Illinois locations	34.4%3,131	39.0%3,949	39.7%4,226	▲ +5.3 pp▲ +1,095▲ +0.7 pp▲ +277▲ +4.6 pp▲ +818
Chicago citywide	35.6%467,892	35.1%497,967	37.0%540,957	▲ +1.4 pp▲ +73,065▲ +1.8 pp▲ +42,990▼ −0.5 pp▲ +30,075
Out of state	1.9%177	1.6%167	1.8%195	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +18▲ +0.2 pp▲ +28▼ −0.3 pp▼ −10
Chicago citywide	4.9%63,789	4.8%68,287	4.9%72,124	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8,335▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,837– 0.0 pp▲ +4,498

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category	Ward 50
No Computer or Smartphone	4.0% ±1.3 pp750 ±253
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	11.7% ±2.1 pp2,212 ±403
Desktop or Laptop Available	79.5% ±2.8 pp15,021 ±537
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
No Computer or Smartphone	4.0%±1.3 pp750±253	5.1%±0.2 pp58,709±2,246	▼ -1.1%	36/50
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	11.7%±2.1 pp2,212±403	10.4%±0.3 pp120,218±3,642	▲ +1.3%	22/50
Desktop or Laptop Available	79.5%±2.8 pp15,021±537	79.7%±0.4 pp924,956±4,919	▼ -0.2%	21/50
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category	Ward 50
Has Internet Access	94.0% ±2.0 pp17,765 ±385
Cellular Data Plan Only	13.1% ±2.0 pp2,474 ±377
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	3.8% ±1.4 pp726 ±271
No Internet Access	6.0% ±1.9 pp1,131 ±354
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Has Internet Access	94.0%±2.0 pp17,765±385	93.1%±0.3 pp1,080,419±3,310	▲ +0.9%	20/50
Cellular Data Plan Only	13.1%±2.0 pp2,474±377	12.5%±0.3 pp145,219±3,463	▲ +0.6%	26/50
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	3.8%±1.4 pp726±271	3.9%±0.2 pp45,350±1,940	▼ -0.1%	22/50
No Internet Access	6.0%±1.9 pp1,131±354	6.9%±0.2 pp79,786±2,730	▼ -0.9%	31/50
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category	Ward 50
Uninsured Residents	11.9% ±1.7 pp6,928 ±963
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	4.4% ±2.0 pp2,592 ±1,192
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	18.8% ±2.9 pp10,948 ±1,681
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	3.1% ±2.0 pp1,830 ±1,169
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Uninsured Residents	11.9%±1.7 pp6,928±963	9.8%±0.2 pp264,391±5,512	▲ +2.1%	19/50
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	4.4%±2.0 pp2,592±1,192	3.9%±0.3 pp104,687±8,689	▲ +0.6%	19/50
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	18.8%±2.9 pp10,948±1,681	13.3%±0.3 pp361,430±8,202	▲ +5.5%	12/50
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	3.1%±2.0 pp1,830±1,169	1.7%±0.3 pp46,718±7,559	▲ +1.4%	9/50
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category	Ward 50
Insured (Any Coverage)	88.1% ±1.7 pp50,685 ±951
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	42.4% ±2.4 pp24,373 ±1,353
Direct-Purchase Insurance	8.2% ±1.3 pp4,729 ±757
Medicare	13.5% ±1.0 pp7,762 ±597
Medicaid	28.7% ±2.2 pp16,502 ±1,260
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.0% ±0.3 pp10 ±175
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	4.2% ±1.2 pp2,409 ±693
Uninsured	11.9% ±1.7 pp6,842 ±952
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Insured (Any Coverage)	88.1%±1.7 pp50,685±951	90.2%±0.2 pp2,424,871±5,689	▼ -2.1%	32/50
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	42.4%±2.4 pp24,373±1,353	51.2%±0.4 pp1,376,912±9,468	▼ -8.9%	33/50
Direct-Purchase Insurance	8.2%±1.3 pp4,729±757	8.5%±0.2 pp227,424±5,112	▼ -0.2%	24/50
Medicare	13.5%±1.0 pp7,762±597	12.6%±0.2 pp339,804±4,911	▲ +0.8%	21/50
Medicaid	28.7%±2.2 pp16,502±1,260	22.2%±0.3 pp596,931±7,773	▲ +6.5%	18/50
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.0%±0.3 pp10±175	0.3%±0.0 pp7,201±787	▼ -0.3%	50/50
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	4.2%±1.2 pp2,409±693	3.8%±0.1 pp102,777±3,544	▲ +0.4%	21/50
Uninsured	11.9%±1.7 pp6,842±952	9.8%±0.2 pp262,018±5,689	▲ +2.1%	19/50
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category	Ward 50
Adults With at Least One Disability	13.3% ±1.4 pp5,355 ±551
Mobility Disability	7.2% ±1.1 pp2,897 ±435
Hearing Disability	3.0% ±0.8 pp1,192 ±303
Vision Disability	2.3% ±0.7 pp925 ±297
Cognitive Disability	5.8% ±1.0 pp2,330 ±397
Self-Care Disability	2.7% ±0.8 pp1,085 ±319
Independent Living Disability	6.7% ±1.1 pp2,685 ±436
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability	13.3%±1.4 pp5,355±551	14.0%±0.2 pp303,665±4,797	▼ -0.7%	26/50
Mobility Disability	7.2%±1.1 pp2,897±435	7.6%±0.2 pp163,666±3,398	▼ -0.3%	22/50
Hearing Disability	3.0%±0.8 pp1,192±303	2.8%±0.1 pp61,430±2,337	▲ +0.1%	24/50
Vision Disability	2.3%±0.7 pp925±297	3.0%±0.1 pp64,544±2,269	▼ -0.7%	30/50
Cognitive Disability	5.8%±1.0 pp2,330±397	5.2%±0.1 pp112,824±2,939	▲ +0.6%	18/50
Self-Care Disability	2.7%±0.8 pp1,085±319	2.7%±0.1 pp57,758±2,261	0%	21/50
Independent Living Disability	6.7%±1.1 pp2,685±436	5.7%±0.2 pp123,651±3,247	▲ +1.0%	16/50
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category	Ward 50
Arthritis	21.3%9,544
High Blood Pressure	30.6%13,728
Cancer	6.3%2,815
Current Asthma	9.3%4,171
Coronary Heart Disease	5.6%2,513
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	6.2%2,768
Diabetes	12.4%5,574
High Cholesterol	35.6%15,959
Obesity	28.0%12,545
Stroke	3.3%1,474
Lost All Natural Teeth	2.9%1,311
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Arthritis	21.3%9,544	19.6%409,178	▲ +1.7%	19/50
High Blood Pressure	30.6%13,728	29.7%620,030	▲ +0.9%	20/50
Cancer	6.3%2,815	5.0%104,382	▲ +1.3%	7/50
Current Asthma	9.3%4,171	10.2%212,940	▼ -0.9%	29/50
Coronary Heart Disease	5.6%2,513	4.8%100,207	▲ +0.8%	17/50
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	6.2%2,768	5.5%114,820	▲ +0.7%	16/50
Diabetes	12.4%5,574	12.0%250,517	▲ +0.4%	22/50
High Cholesterol	35.6%15,959	31.6%659,696	▲ +4.0%	2/50
Obesity	28.0%12,545	32.6%680,572	▼ -4.6%	38/50
Stroke	3.3%1,474	3.3%68,892	0%	20/50
Lost All Natural Teeth	2.9%1,311	2.5%52,249	▲ +0.4%	19/50
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category	Ward 50
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	16.5%7,417
Current Cigarette Smoking	12.1%5,437
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	25.1%11,280
Short Sleep Duration	36.2%16,258
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	16.5%7,417	19.0%396,652	▼ -2.5%	34/50
Current Cigarette Smoking	12.1%5,437	11.9%248,430	▲ +0.2%	22/50
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	25.1%11,280	24.7%515,648	▲ +0.4%	26/50
Short Sleep Duration	36.2%16,258	37.8%789,129	▼ -1.6%	29/50
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category	Ward 50
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	20.4%9,139
Frequent Physical Distress	11.9%5,349
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	20.4%9,139	21.1%440,493	▼ -0.7%	28/50
Frequent Physical Distress	11.9%5,349	11.8%246,342	▲ +0.1%	27/50
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category	Ward 50
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	74.3%33,322
Routine Checkup in Past Year	77.0%34,542
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	86.5%38,801
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	55.0%24,653
Dental Visit in Past Year	57.9%25,977
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	72.2%32,381
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	74.3%33,322	72.5%1,513,542	▲ +1.8%	12/50
Routine Checkup in Past Year	77.0%34,542	76.2%1,590,785	▲ +0.8%	20/50
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	86.5%38,801	86.2%1,799,549	▲ +0.3%	23/50
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	55.0%24,653	55.8%1,164,905	▼ -0.8%	29/50
Dental Visit in Past Year	57.9%25,977	58.4%1,219,184	▼ -0.5%	27/50
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	72.2%32,381	74.2%1,549,032	▼ -2.0%	37/50
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category	Ward 50
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	18.1%8,115
Frequent Mental Distress	14.7%6,613
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	28.2%12,664
Loneliness	34.8%15,613
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 50	City	Difference	Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	18.1%8,115	19.1%398,740	▼ -1.0%	38/50
Frequent Mental Distress	14.7%6,613	16.0%334,023	▼ -1.3%	35/50
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	28.2%12,664	28.2%588,716	0%	26/50
Loneliness	34.8%15,613	35.8%747,377	▼ -1.0%	32/50
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Compare All Wards

Chicago City Council Ward 50

Ward 50 at a Glance

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Age Distribution

Educational Attainment

Population

Household Size

Marital Status

Language Spoken at Home

English Proficiency

Household Composition

Children by Household Type

Veteran Status

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Poverty Status

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Occupation

Industry of Employment

Class of Worker

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Earnings of All Workers

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 50

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 50 in Lower-Income Families

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Ward 50

Local Businesses

Jobs in Ward 50

Industry of Jobs in Ward 50

Earnings of Jobs in Ward 50

Jobs in Ward 50 by Firm Age

Jobs in Ward 50 by Firm Size

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

College Enrollment

Student Digital Access

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Year Moved Into Current Home

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Housing Vacancy Status

Housing Age

Housing Units by Building Size

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Overcrowded Housing

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Monthly Housing Costs

Rent

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Home Values

Federal Housing Assistance

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Commute Time

Household Vehicle Access

Where Ward 50 Residents Work

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Ward 50

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Household Internet Access

Health

Health Insurance

Health Insurance Coverage Types