Chicago City Council Ward 49 Demographics, Housing & Census Data

Chicago City Council Ward 49 Census and ACS demographic tables: population, race, age, income, poverty, rent, housing types, single-family homes, commute, education, internet access, health insurance, and disability.

Chicago City Council Ward 49

vs
Compare All Wards
Maria E. Hadden
Maria E. Hadden
Ward 49 Alderperson
Ward Website City Council Activity One-Page Ward Summary
Ward 49 Map
Average Geographic Mismatch Error : 0.08 p.p. Geographic mismatch error comes from Census geographic boundaries not perfectly aligning with ward boundaries. We can test how much mismatch error skews ward statistics for a subset of variables. For this ward , the average error is 0.08 percentage points. More detail is available on the ward geography page , and the methodology page explains geographic mismatch error in more detail.

Ward 49 Quick Facts

Median Household Income
$62,991±$5.1k
Ward 49
$62,991±$5.1k
Chicago
$77,902±$907
Adults with a Disability
15.8%±1.7 pp
Ward 49
15.8%±1.7 pp
Chicago
14.0%±0.2 pp
Commuters Use Mass Transit
32.0%±2.9 pp
Ward 49
32.0%±2.9 pp
Chicago
22.4%±0.4 pp
Households in Single-Family Homes
7.9%±1.2 pp
Ward 49
7.9%±1.2 pp
Chicago
29.2%±0.3 pp
Statistics View:

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity
Hispanic 22.7% ±2.9 pp12,814 ±1,627
White 43.3% ±2.4 pp24,474 ±1,329
Black 22.5% ±3.1 pp12,709 ±1,743
Asian 6.5% ±1.2 pp3,660 ±685
Other or Multi-racial 5.1% ±1.0 pp2,862 ±588
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Hispanic 22.7%±2.9 pp 29.7%±0.2 pp ▼ -7.0% 21/50
White 43.3%±2.4 pp 32.1%±0.2 pp ▲ +11.2% 18/50
Black 22.5%±3.1 pp 27.4%±0.2 pp ▼ -4.9% 20/50
Asian 6.5%±1.2 pp 7.2%±0.2 pp ▼ -0.8% 23/50
Other or Multi-racial 5.1%±1.0 pp 3.5%±0.1 pp ▲ +1.5% 13/50
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Age Distribution
Under 5 4.6% ±1.2 pp2,612 ±665
5-17 8.2% ±1.2 pp4,630 ±654
18-24 15.3% ±1.6 pp8,658 ±881
25-44 33.8% ±1.6 pp19,084 ±891
45-64 25.6% ±1.8 pp14,491 ±1,022
65-74 8.3% ±0.9 pp4,699 ±532
75-84 3.2% ±0.6 pp1,821 ±326
85+ 0.9% ±0.3 pp523 ±170
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Under 5 4.6%±1.2 pp 5.3%±0.1 pp ▼ -0.7% 38/50
5-17 8.2%±1.2 pp 14.1%±0.2 pp ▼ -5.9% 42/50
18-24 15.3%±1.6 pp 9.6%±0.2 pp ▲ +5.7% 2/50
25-44 33.8%±1.6 pp 34.3%±0.2 pp ▼ -0.5% 20/50
45-64 25.6%±1.8 pp 22.9%±0.2 pp ▲ +2.8% 12/50
65-74 8.3%±0.9 pp 8.2%±0.1 pp ▲ +0.1% 24/50
75-84 3.2%±0.6 pp 4.0%±0.1 pp ▼ -0.7% 36/50
85+ 0.9%±0.3 pp 1.7%±0.1 pp ▼ -0.7% 42/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment
No High School Diploma 11.3% ±1.8 pp4,570 ±737
High School Diploma or GED 16.1% ±1.9 pp6,534 ±759
Some College or Associate's Degree 21.2% ±2.3 pp8,599 ±933
Bachelor's Degree 30.7% ±2.1 pp12,470 ±855
Graduate Degree 20.8% ±1.8 pp8,437 ±740
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
No High School Diploma 11.3%±1.8 pp 12.8%±0.2 pp ▼ -1.5% 28/50
High School Diploma or GED 16.1%±1.9 pp 21.1%±0.3 pp ▼ -5.0% 37/50
Some College or Associate's Degree 21.2%±2.3 pp 21.8%±0.3 pp ▼ -0.6% 27/50
Bachelor's Degree 30.7%±2.1 pp 25.4%±0.3 pp ▲ +5.3% 14/50
Graduate Degree 20.8%±1.8 pp 19.0%±0.3 pp ▲ +1.8% 18/50
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Size
Average Household Size 1.96±0.10
1-Person Households 46.9% ±2.1 pp12,681 ±559
2-Person Households 30.5% ±2.3 pp8,232 ±628
3-Person Households 11.8% ±2.2 pp3,198 ±590
4+ Person Households 10.8% ±1.8 pp2,904 ±494
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Average Household Size 1.96±0.10 2.29±0.02 ▼ −0.33 40/50
1-Person Households 46.9%±2.1 pp 39.7%±0.4 pp ▲ +7.3% 14/50
2-Person Households 30.5%±2.3 pp 29.5%±0.4 pp ▲ +1.0% 18/50
3-Person Households 11.8%±2.2 pp 12.9%±0.3 pp ▼ -1.0% 39/50
4+ Person Households 10.8%±1.8 pp 18.0%±0.3 pp ▼ -7.2% 39/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status
Never Married 56.3% ±1.8 pp28,295 ±905
Married 30.9% ±1.9 pp15,526 ±931
Separated 2.1% ±0.7 pp1,041 ±377
Divorced 7.6% ±1.1 pp3,834 ±574
Widowed 3.0% ±0.7 pp1,532 ±339
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Never Married 56.3%±1.8 pp 49.6%±0.3 pp ▲ +6.7% 12/50
Married 30.9%±1.9 pp 35.5%±0.3 pp ▼ -4.5% 32/50
Separated 2.1%±0.7 pp 2.2%±0.1 pp ▼ -0.1% 26/50
Divorced 7.6%±1.1 pp 7.9%±0.2 pp ▼ -0.3% 28/50
Widowed 3.0%±0.7 pp 4.8%±0.1 pp ▼ -1.8% 42/50
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home
Speak English Only 64.5% ±2.2 pp34,617 ±1,207
Spanish 19.0% ±2.6 pp10,172 ±1,422
Other Languages 8.4% ±1.9 pp4,495 ±1,045
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic 2.6% ±1.2 pp1,413 ±657
Other Indo-European 2.4% ±0.7 pp1,273 ±370
French, Haitian, or Cajun 1.9% ±0.9 pp1,024 ±473
Other Asian and Pacific Island 1.3% ±0.6 pp683 ±328
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this ward or district, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Speak English Only 64.5%±2.2 pp 64.6%±0.3 pp ▼ -0.1% 28/50
Spanish 19.0%±2.6 pp 23.7%±0.2 pp ▼ -4.7% 19/50
Other Languages 8.4%±1.9 pp 1.0%±0.1 pp ▲ +7.4% 2/50
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic 2.6%±1.2 pp 2.6%±0.1 pp ▼ -0.0% 16/30
Other Indo-European 2.4%±0.7 pp 2.4%±0.1 pp ▼ -0.0% 19/27
French, Haitian, or Cajun 1.9%±0.9 pp 0.6%±0.1 pp ▲ +1.3% 2/8
Other Asian and Pacific Island 1.3%±0.6 pp 0.9%±0.1 pp ▲ +0.4% 16/16
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this ward or district, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well 83.6% ±1.8 pp45,064 ±967
Speaks English Well 8.2% ±1.4 pp4,400 ±758
Speaks English Not Well 6.3% ±1.3 pp3,372 ±715
Does Not Speak English 2.0% ±0.7 pp1,072 ±351
Speaks English Less Than Very Well 16.4% ±2.0 pp8,844 ±1,056
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well 83.6%±1.8 pp 85.4%±0.5 pp ▼ -1.8% 31/50
Speaks English Well 8.2%±1.4 pp 7.1%±0.2 pp ▲ +1.0% 21/50
Speaks English Not Well 6.3%±1.3 pp 5.2%±0.2 pp ▲ +1.1% 20/50
Does Not Speak English 2.0%±0.7 pp 2.3%±0.1 pp ▼ -0.3% 21/50
Speaks English Less Than Very Well 16.4%±2.0 pp 14.6%±0.3 pp ▲ +1.8% 20/50
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Composition
Married-Couple Households 25.5% ±2.6 pp6,896 ±704
Unmarried-Couple Households 10.0% ±1.7 pp2,702 ±455
One-Person Households 46.9% ±3.3 pp12,695 ±885
Other Household Types 17.6% ±6.0 pp4,752 ±1,629
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Married-Couple Households 25.5%±2.6 pp NA%±0.3 pp — 30/50
Unmarried-Couple Households 10.0%±1.7 pp NA%±0.2 pp — 14/50
One-Person Households 46.9%±3.3 pp NA%±0.5 pp — 14/50
Other Household Types 17.6%±6.0 pp NA%±0.9 pp — 37/50
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type
Children in Married-Couple Households 65.6% ±11.3 pp4,656 ±800
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 16.2% ±7.6 pp1,147 ±537
Children in Single-Mother Households 15.6% ±5.3 pp1,111 ±375
Children in Single-Father Households 2.6% ±2.0 pp187 ±142
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households 65.6%±11.3 pp 56.0%±0.8 pp ▲ +9.6% 22/50
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 16.2%±7.6 pp 8.8%±0.6 pp ▲ +7.4% 3/50
Children in Single-Mother Households 15.6%±5.3 pp 30.6%±0.9 pp ▼ -15.0% 40/50
Children in Single-Father Households 2.6%±2.0 pp 4.6%±0.4 pp ▼ -2.0% 41/50
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status
Veteran 2.3% ±0.7 pp1,143 ±322
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era 30.6% ±19.0 pp350 ±218
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only 6.6% ±7.9 pp75 ±90
↳ Vietnam Era 40.5% ±12.6 pp463 ±144
↳ Korean War 1.7% ±6.7 pp19 ±77
↳ World War II 0.0% ±4.8 pp0
↳ Other / Peacetime Service 20.6% ±13.9 pp236 ±159
Universe varies by row: Veteran row — civilian population 18 years and over; era rows — civilian veterans 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Veteran 2.3%±0.7 pp 2.8%±0.1 pp ▼ -0.5% 29/50
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era 30.6%±19.0 pp 26.8%±1.8 pp ▲ +3.9% 21/50
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only 6.6%±7.9 pp 12.9%±1.0 pp ▼ -6.3% 38/50
↳ Vietnam Era 40.5%±12.6 pp 28.8%±1.4 pp ▲ +11.7% 2/50
↳ Korean War 1.7%±6.7 pp 4.9%±0.7 pp ▼ -3.3% 39/50
↳ World War II 0.0%±4.8 pp 1.0%±0.3 pp ▼ -1.0% 29/50
↳ Other / Peacetime Service 20.6%±13.9 pp 25.6%±1.5 pp ▼ -4.9% 33/50
Universe varies by row: Veteran row — civilian population 18 years and over; era rows — civilian veterans 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship
U.S.-Born Residents 73.5% ±2.2 pp41,564 ±1,233
Foreign-Born Residents 26.5% ±2.4 pp14,955 ±1,374
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens 10.4% ±1.5 pp5,903 ±822
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens 16.0% ±2.1 pp9,052 ±1,196
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
U.S.-Born Residents 73.5%±2.2 pp 79.1%±0.3 pp ▼ -5.6% 34/50
Foreign-Born Residents 26.5%±2.4 pp 20.9%±0.3 pp ▲ +5.6% 17/50
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens 10.4%±1.5 pp 10.0%±0.2 pp ▲ +0.5% 21/50
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens 16.0%±2.1 pp 10.9%±0.2 pp ▲ +5.1% 11/50
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth
All foreign-born residents: 26.5%±2.5 ppAll foreign-born residents: 14,874±1,382
Born in Mexico 6.9%±1.5 pp3,891±835
Born in Nigeria 2.4%±1.1 pp1,366±640
Born in other countries 15.7%8,843
‘Born in other countries’ includes all countries where the foreign-born population is below 1% of the total ward population.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Ward 49 Chicago Difference Rank
All foreign-born residents 26.5% ±2.5 pp14,874 20.9% ±0.3 pp566,883 ▲ +5.6% 17/50
Born in Mexico 6.9% ±1.5 pp3,891 8.2% ±0.2 pp222,978 ▼ -1.3% 18/50
Born in Nigeria 2.4% ±1.1 pp1,366 0.3% ±0.0 pp9,223 ▲ +2.1% 1/50
Born in other countries 15.7%8,843 ——
‘Born in other countries’ includes all countries where the foreign-born population is below 1% of the total ward population.
The city average is not shown for ‘Born in other countries’ — the composition of countries in this category can differ across Chicago as a whole.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry
Total Foreign-Born Residents 26.5%±2.5 pp14,875±1,537
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later 11.2% ±2.1 pp6,307 ±1,188
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 5.0% ±0.9 pp2,786 ±516
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 5.1% ±1.2 pp2,856 ±652
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 5.2% ±0.8 pp2,925 ±471
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Total Foreign-Born Residents 26.5%±2.5 pp14,875±1,537 20.9%±0.3 pp ▲ +5.6%
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later 11.2%±2.1 pp 5.9%±0.2 pp ▲ +5.3% 4/50
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 5.0%±0.9 pp 4.5%±0.1 pp ▲ +0.5% 21/50
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 5.1%±1.2 pp 4.6%±0.1 pp ▲ +0.5% 23/50
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 5.2%±0.8 pp 6.0%±0.1 pp ▼ -0.8% 23/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income
Median Household Income $62,991±$5,050
Less Than $25k 19.3% ±2.7 pp5,210 ±731
$25k-$50k 20.8% ±2.7 pp5,609 ±720
$50k-$75k 18.3% ±2.3 pp4,936 ±630
$75k-$100k 14.9% ±1.8 pp4,030 ±498
$100k-$150k 15.6% ±2.2 pp4,228 ±586
$150k+ 11.1% ±1.8 pp3,003 ±489
Note: Medians are approximated via unit-level averages. See methodology page for more details.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Median Household Income $62,991±$5,050 $77,902±$907 ▼ −$14,911 35/50
Less Than $25k 19.3%±2.7 pp 18.8%±0.4 pp ▲ +0.5% 22/50
$25k-$50k 20.8%±2.7 pp 16.0%±0.4 pp ▲ +4.8% 15/50
$50k-$75k 18.3%±2.3 pp 13.7%±0.3 pp ▲ +4.5% 3/50
$75k-$100k 14.9%±1.8 pp 11.7%±0.3 pp ▲ +3.2% 3/50
$100k-$150k 15.6%±2.2 pp 16.4%±0.3 pp ▼ -0.8% 28/50
$150k+ 11.1%±1.8 pp 23.4%±0.4 pp ▼ -12.3% 36/50
Note: Medians are approximated via unit-level averages. See methodology page for more details.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Poverty Status
Below the Poverty Line 18.3% ±2.5 pp10,353 ±1,418
Below 200% of the Poverty Line 35.6% ±3.7 pp20,108 ±2,112
Below 50% of the Poverty Line 8.4% ±1.5 pp4,768 ±854
Note: Excludes some populations like college dorms and nursing homes. See how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Below the Poverty Line 18.3%±2.5 pp 16.8%±0.4 pp ▲ +1.5% 22/50
Below 200% of the Poverty Line 35.6%±3.7 pp 33.4%±0.6 pp ▲ +2.2% 26/50
Below 50% of the Poverty Line 8.4%±1.5 pp 8.3%±0.3 pp ▲ +0.1% 21/50
Note: Excludes some populations like college dorms and nursing homes. See how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship
Food Insecurity 21.6%9,392
Housing Insecurity 17.7%7,708
Transportation Barriers 10.8%4,687
Threatened Utility Shutoff 10.9%4,727
Note: Food insecurity: not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity: worried about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers: lack of reliable transportation keeping them from medical appointments, meetings, work, or from getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat: threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adults 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES (modeled estimates; no margin of error)
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Food Insecurity 21.6% 24.4% ▼ -2.8% 31/50
Housing Insecurity 17.7% 19.7% ▼ -2.0% 30/50
Transportation Barriers 10.8% 11.6% ▼ -0.8% 28/50
Threatened Utility Shutoff 10.9% 11.9% ▼ -1.0% 27/50
Note: Food insecurity: not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity: worried about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers: lack of reliable transportation keeping them from medical appointments, meetings, work, or from getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat: threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adults 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES (modeled estimates; no margin of error)

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54
In the Labor Force 87.8% ±1.9 pp22,479 ±476
↳ Employed 82.1% ±2.3 pp21,008 ±576
↳ Unemployed 5.6% ±1.5 pp1,430 ±381
↳ Unemployment Rate 6.4% ±1.7 pp—
Not in the Labor Force 12.2% ±7.9 pp3,118 ±2,029
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
In the Labor Force 87.8%±1.9 pp 85.6%±0.3 pp ▲ +2.3% 18/50
↳ Employed 82.1%±2.3 pp 79.6%±0.3 pp ▲ +2.5% 22/50
↳ Unemployed 5.6%±1.5 pp 5.9%±0.2 pp ▼ -0.3% 28/50
↳ Unemployment Rate 6.4%±1.7 pp 6.9%±0.2 pp ▼ -0.6% 28/50
Not in the Labor Force 12.2%±7.9 pp 14.4%±1.1 pp ▼ -2.3% 33/50
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation
Management, Business, Science & Arts 47.3% ±3.3 pp15,527 ±1,089
↳ Management Occupations 10.0% ±1.5 pp3,268 ±489
↳ Business & Financial Operations 5.8% ±1.2 pp1,915 ±406
↳ Computer & Mathematical 5.0% ±1.3 pp1,638 ±424
↳ Architecture & Engineering 1.3% ±0.7 pp419 ±215
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 2.6% ±0.8 pp856 ±253
↳ Community & Social Service 2.6% ±0.9 pp853 ±282
↳ Legal Occupations 1.7% ±0.8 pp546 ±276
↳ Education, Training & Library 8.9% ±1.5 pp2,923 ±483
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 4.4% ±1.0 pp1,444 ±328
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 3.4% ±1.1 pp1,113 ±353
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 1.7% ±0.7 pp555 ±216
Service 19.2% ±2.4 pp6,290 ±784
↳ Healthcare Support 3.9% ±1.1 pp1,275 ±366
↳ Protective Service 1.0% ±0.5 pp326 ±178
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 6.5% ±1.5 pp2,120 ±479
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 4.0% ±1.3 pp1,313 ±423
↳ Personal Care & Service 3.8% ±1.0 pp1,256 ±340
Sales & Office 18.1% ±2.2 pp5,936 ±733
↳ Sales & Related 8.7% ±1.6 pp2,856 ±524
↳ Office & Administrative Support 9.4% ±1.5 pp3,080 ±497
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 3.5% ±1.0 pp1,148 ±335
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.1% ±0.3 pp25 ±82
↳ Construction & Extraction 2.0% ±0.8 pp649 ±265
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 1.4% ±0.7 pp474 ±219
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 12.0% ±2.3 pp3,935 ±748
↳ Production Occupations 4.4% ±1.5 pp1,435 ±477
↳ Transportation Occupations 3.9% ±1.2 pp1,296 ±382
↳ Material Moving Occupations 3.7% ±1.3 pp1,205 ±416
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts 47.3%±3.3 pp 49.2%±0.4 pp ▼ -1.9% 20/50
↳ Management Occupations 10.0%±1.5 pp 12.3%±0.3 pp ▼ -2.4% 28/50
↳ Business & Financial Operations 5.8%±1.2 pp 9.1%±0.2 pp ▼ -3.3% 31/50
↳ Computer & Mathematical 5.0%±1.3 pp 4.9%±0.2 pp ▲ +0.0% 17/50
↳ Architecture & Engineering 1.3%±0.7 pp 1.6%±0.1 pp ▼ -0.4% 30/50
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 2.6%±0.8 pp 1.4%±0.1 pp ▲ +1.2% 3/50
↳ Community & Social Service 2.6%±0.9 pp 1.9%±0.1 pp ▲ +0.7% 12/50
↳ Legal Occupations 1.7%±0.8 pp 2.3%±0.1 pp ▼ -0.6% 23/50
↳ Education, Training & Library 8.9%±1.5 pp 6.6%±0.2 pp ▲ +2.3% 4/50
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 4.4%±1.0 pp 3.1%±0.1 pp ▲ +1.3% 10/50
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 3.4%±1.1 pp 4.6%±0.2 pp ▼ -1.2% 28/50
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 1.7%±0.7 pp 1.3%±0.1 pp ▲ +0.4% 11/50
Service 19.2%±2.4 pp 16.9%±0.3 pp ▲ +2.3% 27/50
↳ Healthcare Support 3.9%±1.1 pp 3.4%±0.2 pp ▲ +0.5% 19/50
↳ Protective Service 1.0%±0.5 pp 2.8%±0.1 pp ▼ -1.8% 41/50
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 6.5%±1.5 pp 5.1%±0.2 pp ▲ +1.4% 14/50
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 4.0%±1.3 pp 3.0%±0.1 pp ▲ +1.0% 22/50
↳ Personal Care & Service 3.8%±1.0 pp 2.7%±0.1 pp ▲ +1.1% 6/50
Sales & Office 18.1%±2.2 pp 17.4%±0.3 pp ▲ +0.6% 22/50
↳ Sales & Related 8.7%±1.6 pp 8.1%±0.2 pp ▲ +0.6% 13/50
↳ Office & Administrative Support 9.4%±1.5 pp 9.3%±0.3 pp ▲ +0.0% 26/50
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 3.5%±1.0 pp 4.6%±0.2 pp ▼ -1.1% 32/50
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.1%±0.3 pp 0.1%±0.0 pp ▼ -0.0% 21/50
↳ Construction & Extraction 2.0%±0.8 pp 2.8%±0.1 pp ▼ -0.8% 31/50
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 1.4%±0.7 pp 1.7%±0.1 pp ▼ -0.2% 30/50
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 12.0%±2.3 pp 11.8%±0.3 pp ▲ +0.1% 29/50
↳ Production Occupations 4.4%±1.5 pp 4.2%±0.2 pp ▲ +0.2% 29/50
↳ Transportation Occupations 3.9%±1.2 pp 3.9%±0.2 pp ▲ +0.1% 31/50
↳ Material Moving Occupations 3.7%±1.3 pp 3.8%±0.2 pp ▼ -0.1% 29/50
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.2% ±0.3 pp68 ±94
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.2% ±0.3 pp68 ±94
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0% ±0.2 pp0
Construction 2.5% ±0.9 pp825 ±289
Manufacturing 6.3% ±1.3 pp2,063 ±410
Wholesale Trade 1.9% ±0.9 pp639 ±281
Retail Trade 9.7% ±1.5 pp3,182 ±507
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 4.3% ±1.1 pp1,396 ±365
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 4.0% ±1.1 pp1,324 ±364
↳ Utilities 0.2% ±0.3 pp73 ±95
Information 2.2% ±0.8 pp730 ±248
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 5.7% ±1.1 pp1,882 ±354
↳ Finance & Insurance 4.1% ±0.9 pp1,347 ±310
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.6% ±0.6 pp535 ±193
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 17.5% ±2.4 pp5,757 ±786
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 11.8% ±1.8 pp3,863 ±598
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0% ±0.2 pp0
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 5.8% ±1.7 pp1,894 ±552
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 30.3% ±2.3 pp9,935 ±748
↳ Educational Services 14.2% ±1.7 pp4,656 ±545
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 16.1% ±1.9 pp5,280 ±637
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 11.7% ±1.8 pp3,857 ±592
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 3.4% ±0.9 pp1,112 ±289
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 8.4% ±1.6 pp2,745 ±538
Other Services 5.4% ±1.1 pp1,776 ±352
Public Administration 2.2% ±0.7 pp726 ±239
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.2%±0.3 pp 0.2%±0.0 pp ▲ +0.0% 23/50
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.2%±0.3 pp 0.2%±0.0 pp ▲ +0.0% 18/50
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%±0.2 pp 0.0%±0.0 pp ▼ -0.0% 23/50
Construction 2.5%±0.9 pp 3.8%±0.2 pp ▼ -1.2% 33/50
Manufacturing 6.3%±1.3 pp 7.7%±0.2 pp ▼ -1.4% 36/50
Wholesale Trade 1.9%±0.9 pp 2.0%±0.1 pp ▼ -0.1% 25/50
Retail Trade 9.7%±1.5 pp 8.2%±0.2 pp ▲ +1.5% 19/50
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 4.3%±1.1 pp 7.1%±0.2 pp ▼ -2.8% 42/50
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 4.0%±1.1 pp 6.5%±0.2 pp ▼ -2.5% 42/50
↳ Utilities 0.2%±0.3 pp 0.5%±0.1 pp ▼ -0.3% 43/50
Information 2.2%±0.8 pp 2.1%±0.1 pp ▲ +0.1% 19/50
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 5.7%±1.1 pp 8.8%±0.2 pp ▼ -3.1% 37/50
↳ Finance & Insurance 4.1%±0.9 pp 6.7%±0.2 pp ▼ -2.6% 38/50
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.6%±0.6 pp 2.1%±0.1 pp ▼ -0.5% 34/50
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 17.5%±2.4 pp 18.2%±0.4 pp ▼ -0.7% 17/50
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 11.8%±1.8 pp 13.4%±0.3 pp ▼ -1.7% 18/50
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%±0.2 pp 0.1%±0.0 pp ▼ -0.1% 37/50
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 5.8%±1.7 pp 4.6%±0.2 pp ▲ +1.1% 18/50
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 30.3%±2.3 pp 24.2%±0.4 pp ▲ +6.1% 12/50
↳ Educational Services 14.2%±1.7 pp 10.5%±0.2 pp ▲ +3.7% 6/50
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 16.1%±1.9 pp 13.7%±0.3 pp ▲ +2.4% 13/50
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 11.7%±1.8 pp 9.1%±0.2 pp ▲ +2.6% 12/50
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 3.4%±0.9 pp 2.2%±0.1 pp ▲ +1.2% 4/50
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 8.4%±1.6 pp 6.9%±0.2 pp ▲ +1.4% 14/50
Other Services 5.4%±1.1 pp 4.6%±0.2 pp ▲ +0.8% 17/50
Public Administration 2.2%±0.7 pp 4.0%±0.2 pp ▼ -1.8% 43/50
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker
Private Company Employee 65.2% ±2.7 pp21,414 ±875
Self-Employed 7.9% ±1.3 pp2,603 ±437
Nonprofit 17.8% ±1.9 pp5,853 ±637
Government 9.0% ±1.6 pp2,960 ±514
Unpaid Family Worker 0.0% ±0.2 pp7 ±79
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Private Company Employee 65.2%±2.7 pp 67.9%±0.4 pp ▼ -2.7% 29/50
Self-Employed 7.9%±1.3 pp 8.3%±0.2 pp ▼ -0.4% 25/50
Nonprofit 17.8%±1.9 pp 12.1%±0.3 pp ▲ +5.7% 3/50
Government 9.0%±1.6 pp 12.9%±0.3 pp ▼ -3.9% 41/50
Unpaid Family Worker 0.0%±0.2 pp 0.2%±0.0 pp ▼ -0.1% 41/50
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work
Full-Time, Year-Round 57.5% ±1.9 pp21,017 ±693
Part-Time or Part-Year 42.5% ±2.8 pp15,513 ±1,040
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months; paid time off, sick leave, and holidays count toward weeks worked. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round 57.5%±1.9 pp 67.0%±0.3 pp ▼ -9.5% 47/50
Part-Time or Part-Year 42.5%±2.8 pp 33.0%±0.3 pp ▲ +9.5% 4/50
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months; paid time off, sick leave, and holidays count toward weeks worked. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers
Under $25,000 5.1% ±1.7 pp1,081 ±352
$25,000–$34,999 10.6% ±2.2 pp2,230 ±467
$35,000–$49,999 23.9% ±2.9 pp5,024 ±613
$50,000–$74,999 27.6% ±3.1 pp5,794 ±656
$75,000–$99,999 15.2% ±2.3 pp3,196 ±477
$100,000 or More 17.6% ±2.3 pp3,693 ±476
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months; paid time off, sick leave, and holidays count toward weeks worked.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Under $25,000 5.1%±1.7 pp 7.1%±0.2 pp ▼ -2.0% 37/50
$25,000–$34,999 10.6%±2.2 pp 8.8%±0.3 pp ▲ +1.8% 26/50
$35,000–$49,999 23.9%±2.9 pp 16.5%±0.4 pp ▲ +7.4% 13/50
$50,000–$74,999 27.6%±3.1 pp 22.0%±0.4 pp ▲ +5.5% 2/50
$75,000–$99,999 15.2%±2.3 pp 15.7%±0.4 pp ▼ -0.5% 25/50
$100,000 or More 17.6%±2.3 pp 29.9%±0.4 pp ▼ -12.3% 31/50
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months; paid time off, sick leave, and holidays count toward weeks worked.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers
Under $5,000 22.4% ±3.6 pp3,471 ±563
$5,000–$9,999 12.7% ±2.3 pp1,966 ±353
$10,000–$14,999 12.5% ±2.9 pp1,943 ±453
$15,000–$24,999 18.1% ±3.2 pp2,803 ±494
$25,000–$49,999 21.6% ±3.2 pp3,351 ±501
$50,000 or More 12.8% ±2.6 pp1,980 ±400
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year; paid time off, sick leave, and holidays count toward weeks worked.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Under $5,000 22.4%±3.6 pp 18.7%±0.6 pp ▲ +3.6% 11/50
$5,000–$9,999 12.7%±2.3 pp 12.3%±0.4 pp ▲ +0.4% 22/50
$10,000–$14,999 12.5%±2.9 pp 11.3%±0.5 pp ▲ +1.2% 15/50
$15,000–$24,999 18.1%±3.2 pp 18.5%±0.5 pp ▼ -0.5% 30/50
$25,000–$49,999 21.6%±3.2 pp 21.6%±0.6 pp ▲ +0.0% 27/50
$50,000 or More 12.8%±2.6 pp 17.6%±0.5 pp ▼ -4.8% 30/50
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year; paid time off, sick leave, and holidays count toward weeks worked.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of All Workers
Under $25,000 31.2% ±2.6 pp11,432 ±943
$25,000–$34,999 11.3% ±1.6 pp4,123 ±595
$35,000–$49,999 17.7% ±1.9 pp6,497 ±683
$50,000–$74,999 18.5% ±2.0 pp6,787 ±718
$75,000–$99,999 9.7% ±1.4 pp3,569 ±504
$100,000 or More 11.6% ±1.5 pp4,242 ±544
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Under $25,000 31.2%±2.6 pp 24.8%±0.3 pp ▲ +6.4% 18/50
$25,000–$34,999 11.3%±1.6 pp 9.6%±0.2 pp ▲ +1.7% 24/50
$35,000–$49,999 17.7%±1.9 pp 14.5%±0.3 pp ▲ +3.3% 17/50
$50,000–$74,999 18.5%±2.0 pp 17.4%±0.3 pp ▲ +1.1% 14/50
$75,000–$99,999 9.7%±1.4 pp 11.9%±0.3 pp ▼ -2.2% 33/50
$100,000 or More 11.6%±1.5 pp 21.8%±0.3 pp ▼ -10.2% 31/50
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Students

K-12 School Enrollment
Enrolled in K-12 School 7.7% ±1.1 pp4,356 ±637
↳ Public School (Among K-12 Enrollees)Public School 88.5% ±5.1 pp3,853 ±222
↳ Private School (Among K-12 Enrollees)Private School 11.5% ±4.7 pp503 ±205
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School 7.7%±1.1 pp 13.5%±0.2 pp ▼ -5.8% 43/50
↳ Public School (Among K-12 Enrollees)Public School 88.5%±5.1 pp 83.0%±0.5 pp ▲ +5.4% 20/50
↳ Private School (Among K-12 Enrollees)Private School 11.5%±4.7 pp 17.0%±0.6 pp ▼ -5.4% 31/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

College Enrollment
Enrolled in College or Graduate School 13.9% ±1.5 pp7,866 ±830
↳ Public College or University (Among College Enrollees)Public College or University 33.9% ±6.0 pp2,667 ±472
↳ Private College or University (Among College Enrollees)Private College or University 66.1% ±4.9 pp5,199 ±385
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School 13.9%±1.5 pp 7.4%±0.1 pp ▲ +6.5% 4/50
↳ Public College or University (Among College Enrollees)Public College or University 33.9%±6.0 pp 52.4%±0.7 pp ▼ -18.5% 44/50
↳ Private College or University (Among College Enrollees)Private College or University 66.1%±4.9 pp 47.6%±1.2 pp ▲ +18.5% 7/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Student Digital Access
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 2.9% ±3.2 pp147 ±166
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 7.4% ±4.0 pp459 ±250
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 2.9%±3.2 pp 5.9%±0.5 pp ▼ -3.0% 36/50
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 7.4%±4.0 pp 5.4%±0.6 pp ▲ +2.0% 15/50
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing
By household — share of occupied units
NA 28.7%7,752
NA 71.3%19,235
By resident — share of people
Owner-Occupied 29.4% ±3.0 pp15,566 ±1,607
Renter-Occupied 70.6% ±3.6 pp37,420 ±1,894
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
By household — share of occupied units
NA 28.7% 46.0% ▼ -17.3% 49/50
NA 71.3% 54.0% ▲ +17.3% 2/50
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
By resident — share of people
Owner-Occupied 29.4%±3.0 pp 51.8%±0.5 pp ▼ -22.4% 49/50
Renter-Occupied 70.6%±3.6 pp 48.2%±0.5 pp ▲ +22.4% 2/50
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home
Median Year Moved In 2017±0.7 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later 7.3% ±1.6 pp1,979 ±424
Moved in 2020 to 2022 31.5% ±2.5 pp8,520 ±665
Moved in 2010 to 2019 40.2% ±3.1 pp10,859 ±844
Moved in 2000 to 2009 11.4% ±1.9 pp3,091 ±519
Moved in 1990 to 1999 6.1% ±1.8 pp1,648 ±499
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 3.5% ±1.2 pp949 ±318
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period. Because respondents could have answered at any point between 2020 and 2024, move-in year does not translate directly into years in current residence.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Median Year Moved In 2017±0.7 yr 2015±1.0 yr ▲ +2 9/50
Moved in 2023 or Later 7.3%±1.6 pp 5.9%±0.2 pp ▲ +1.4% 12/50
Moved in 2020 to 2022 31.5%±2.5 pp 24.1%±0.4 pp ▲ +7.4% 9/50
Moved in 2010 to 2019 40.2%±3.1 pp 39.2%±0.5 pp ▲ +0.9% 21/50
Moved in 2000 to 2009 11.4%±1.9 pp 13.8%±0.3 pp ▼ -2.4% 37/50
Moved in 1990 to 1999 6.1%±1.8 pp 8.2%±0.2 pp ▼ -2.1% 36/50
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 3.5%±1.2 pp 8.7%±0.2 pp ▼ -5.2% 42/50
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period. Because respondents could have answered at any point between 2020 and 2024, move-in year does not translate directly into years in current residence.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers
Moved Within the Past Year 21.2% ±2.3 pp11,771 ±1,288
↳ Moved Within Cook County 14.1% ±2.1 pp7,845 ±1,164
↳ Moved From Different Illinois County 1.5% ±0.5 pp846 ±250
↳ Moved From Different State 3.9% ±0.8 pp2,144 ±453
↳ Moved From Abroad 1.7% ±0.8 pp936 ±422
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Moved Within the Past Year 21.2%±2.3 pp 14.0%±0.3 pp ▲ +7.2% 8/50
↳ Moved Within Cook County 14.1%±2.1 pp 9.8%±0.3 pp ▲ +4.3% 9/50
↳ Moved From Different Illinois County 1.5%±0.5 pp 0.8%±0.1 pp ▲ +0.8% 8/50
↳ Moved From Different State 3.9%±0.8 pp 2.5%±0.1 pp ▲ +1.4% 11/50
↳ Moved From Abroad 1.7%±0.8 pp 1.0%±0.1 pp ▲ +0.7% 8/50
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Vacancy Rate
Vacant Housing Units 9.3% ±1.6 pp2,780 ±481
Occupied Housing Units 90.7% ±1.7 pp27,045 ±499
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Vacant Housing Units 9.3%±1.6 pp 9.1%±0.2 pp ▲ +0.2% 16/50
Occupied Housing Units 90.7%±1.7 pp 90.9%±0.2 pp ▼ -0.2% 35/50
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Age
Median Year Built 1945±2 yr
Pre-1940 47.2% ±2.9 pp14,074 ±861
1940-2009 49.7% ±3.5 pp14,816 ±1,031
2010+ 3.1% ±0.9 pp935 ±277
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact. Medians are also approximated via unit-level averages; see methodology page for more details.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Median Year Built 1945±2 yr 1953±1 yr ▼ −8 yrs 38/50
Pre-1940 47.2%±2.9 pp 38.8%±0.4 pp ▲ +8.4% 16/50
1940-2009 49.7%±3.5 pp 54.9%±0.6 pp ▼ -5.2% 33/50
2010+ 3.1%±0.9 pp 6.3%±0.2 pp ▼ -3.2% 29/50
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact. Medians are also approximated via unit-level averages; see methodology page for more details.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size
Population Density 30,989 /sq mi±1,466/sq mi
Single-Family Homes 7.9% ±1.2 pp2,363 ±353
Buildings With 2–4 Units 13.5% ±2.1 pp4,026 ±640
Buildings With 5–19 Units 36.3% ±2.7 pp10,834 ±791
Buildings With 20 or More Units 41.8% ±2.9 pp12,460 ±872
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Population Density 30,989 /sq mi±1,466/sq mi 11,721 /sq mi±26/sq mi ▲ +19,268 /sq mi 5/50
Single-Family Homes 7.9%±1.2 pp 29.2%±0.3 pp ▼ -21.3% 44/50
Buildings With 2–4 Units 13.5%±2.1 pp 27.4%±0.4 pp ▼ -13.9% 39/50
Buildings With 5–19 Units 36.3%±2.7 pp 16.2%±0.3 pp ▲ +20.2% 1/50
Buildings With 20 or More Units 41.8%±2.9 pp 27.0%±0.3 pp ▲ +14.8% 12/50
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms
Studio 14.7% ±1.9 pp4,371 ±557
1 Bedroom 32.0% ±2.8 pp9,536 ±825
2 Bedrooms 34.0% ±2.5 pp10,154 ±755
3 Bedrooms 15.2% ±1.8 pp4,533 ±528
4 Bedrooms 3.0% ±0.9 pp909 ±269
5 or More Bedrooms 1.1% ±0.5 pp322 ±146
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Studio 14.7%±1.9 pp 7.5%±0.3 pp ▲ +7.2% 8/50
1 Bedroom 32.0%±2.8 pp 20.1%±0.4 pp ▲ +11.8% 8/50
2 Bedrooms 34.0%±2.5 pp 33.1%±0.3 pp ▲ +0.9% 22/50
3 Bedrooms 15.2%±1.8 pp 26.1%±0.3 pp ▼ -10.9% 44/50
4 Bedrooms 3.0%±0.9 pp 9.0%±0.2 pp ▼ -6.0% 46/50
5 or More Bedrooms 1.1%±0.5 pp 4.1%±0.2 pp ▼ -3.0% 45/50
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Cost Burden
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 29.9% ±2.5 pp8,068 ±668
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 27.9% ±2.4 pp7,533 ±661
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 42.3% ±3.1 pp11,414 ±843
Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 20.8% ±2.7 pp5,620 ±731
Note: Housing costs include rent or mortgage payments and utilities. A household spending 30% or more of income on housing is considered cost burdened.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 29.9%±2.5 pp 24.9%±0.4 pp ▲ +4.9% 44/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 27.9%±2.4 pp 23.8%±0.4 pp ▲ +4.1% 3/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 42.3%±3.1 pp 45.6%±0.5 pp ▼ -3.4% 19/50
Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 20.8%±2.7 pp 24.0%±0.4 pp ▼ -3.2% 22/50
Note: Housing costs include rent or mortgage payments and utilities. A household spending 30% or more of income on housing is considered cost burdened.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rents and Utilities
Median Rent $1,251 ±$78
Median Rent and Utilities $1,353 ±$79
Note: Medians are approximated via unit-level averages. See methodology page for more details. ACS-measured contract rent is often lower than estimates from real estate services like Zillow. First, current tenants typically pay less than the asking rent for vacant units—real estate services only capture the latter. Second, the ACS rent question asks what the occupant personally pays: someone splitting a unit with a roommate reports only their share, and households receiving rental assistance report only their out-of-pocket portion.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group (Median Rent); Census Tract (Median Rent Plus Utilities) · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Ward 49 City (Avg) Difference Rank
Median Rent $1,251 ±$78 $1,291 ±$12 -$40 23/50
Median Rent and Utilities $1,353 ±$79 $1,447 ±$10 -$95 27/50
Note: Medians are approximated via unit-level averages. See methodology page for more details. ACS-measured contract rent is often lower than estimates from real estate services like Zillow. First, current tenants typically pay less than the asking rent for vacant units—real estate services only capture the latter. Second, the ACS rent question asks what the occupant personally pays: someone splitting a unit with a roommate reports only their share, and households receiving rental assistance report only their out-of-pocket portion.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group (Median Rent); Census Tract (Median Rent Plus Utilities) · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Primary Home Heating Fuel
Natural Gas Heat 77.2% ±2.6 pp20,866 ±692
Electric Heat 16.6% ±2.1 pp4,483 ±562
Other Heating Source 6.3% ±1.4 pp1,697 ±383
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Natural Gas Heat 77.2%±2.6 pp 77.5%±0.3 pp ▼ -0.4% 38/50
Electric Heat 16.6%±2.1 pp 18.0%±0.3 pp ▼ -1.4% 14/50
Other Heating Source 6.3%±1.4 pp 4.4%±0.2 pp ▲ +1.8% 9/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Home Values
25th Percentile $190,735±$20,986
Median $280,540±$38,717
75th Percentile $450,837±$56,656
Under $100,000 3.9% ±3.0 pp308 ±236
$100,000 to $199,999 25.9% ±4.3 pp2,029 ±338
$200,000 to $299,999 25.3% ±4.1 pp1,977 ±318
$300,000 to $499,999 25.9% ±4.1 pp2,029 ±318
$500,000 to $999,999 17.4% ±4.0 pp1,358 ±313
$1 Million or More 1.5% ±1.8 pp119 ±141
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Median, 25th percentile and 75th percentile are approximated via unit-level averages. See methodology page for more details.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
25th Percentile $190,735±$20,986 $217,800±$1,804 −$27,065 36/50
Median $280,540±$38,717 $334,100±$2,424 −$53,560 33/50
75th Percentile $450,837±$56,656 $497,700±$3,730 −$46,863 27/50
Under $100,000 3.9%±3.0 pp 6.6%±0.3 pp ▼ -2.6% 31/50
$100,000 to $199,999 25.9%±4.3 pp 14.3%±0.4 pp ▲ +11.6% 10/50
$200,000 to $299,999 25.3%±4.1 pp 22.5%±0.5 pp ▲ +2.8% 23/50
$300,000 to $499,999 25.9%±4.1 pp 31.9%±0.5 pp ▼ -6.0% 31/50
$500,000 to $999,999 17.4%±4.0 pp 18.8%±0.4 pp ▼ -1.5% 25/50
$1 Million or More 1.5%±1.8 pp 5.9%±0.3 pp ▼ -4.4% 33/50
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Median, 25th percentile and 75th percentile are approximated via unit-level averages. See methodology page for more details.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room 5.0% ±1.6 pp1,359 ±444
Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room 3.0% ±1.3 pp812 ±357
Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room 2.0% ±1.0 pp547 ±266
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room 5.0%±1.6 pp 3.4%±0.2 pp ▲ +1.6% 11/50
Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room 3.0%±1.3 pp 2.0%±0.1 pp ▲ +1.0% 16/50
Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room 2.0%±1.0 pp 1.4%±0.1 pp ▲ +0.6% 13/50
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Transportation

How Workers Commute
Drives Alone 50.0% ±3.3 pp12,568 ±822
Carpools 6.0% ±1.6 pp1,510 ±396
Took Public Transit 32.0% ±2.9 pp8,048 ±738
Walks 7.2% ±1.8 pp1,812 ±440
Biked 2.4% ±1.0 pp605 ±246
Other Commute Mode 1.2% ±0.7 pp292 ±174
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Drives Alone 50.0%±3.3 pp 56.6%±0.4 pp ▼ -6.7% 38/50
Carpools 6.0%±1.6 pp 9.3%±0.3 pp ▼ -3.3% 40/50
Took Public Transit 32.0%±2.9 pp 22.4%±0.4 pp ▲ +9.6% 8/50
Walks 7.2%±1.8 pp 7.3%±0.3 pp ▼ -0.1% 12/50
Biked 2.4%±1.0 pp 1.8%±0.1 pp ▲ +0.6% 17/50
Other Commute Mode 1.2%±0.7 pp 2.5%±0.1 pp ▼ -1.4% 33/50
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time
Average commute time 36 min±1.1 min
Less Than 15 Minutes 11.0% ±2.1 pp2,746 ±527
15–29 Minutes 26.5% ±2.8 pp6,631 ±705
30–44 Minutes 28.4% ±3.2 pp7,123 ±802
45–59 Minutes 16.4% ±2.5 pp4,113 ±625
60 Minutes or More 17.8% ±2.2 pp4,451 ±555
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Average commute time 36 min±1.1 min 33 min±0.2 min ▲ +3 min 14/50
Less Than 15 Minutes 11.0%±2.1 pp 13.0%±0.3 pp ▼ -2.1% 30/50
15–29 Minutes 26.5%±2.8 pp 29.9%±0.5 pp ▼ -3.5% 32/50
30–44 Minutes 28.4%±3.2 pp 29.6%±0.4 pp ▼ -1.2% 32/50
45–59 Minutes 16.4%±2.5 pp 14.0%±0.3 pp ▲ +2.4% 16/50
60 Minutes or More 17.8%±2.2 pp 13.4%±0.3 pp ▲ +4.3% 11/50
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access
Average Vehicles per Household 0.84±0.05
Households With No Vehicle 35.9% ±2.9 pp9,689 ±788
Households With 1 Vehicle 45.8% ±2.8 pp12,385 ±759
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 18.3% ±2.3 pp4,941 ±633
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Average Vehicles per Household 0.84±0.05 1.12±0.01 ▼ −0.28 41/50
Households With No Vehicle 35.9%±2.9 pp 26.6%±0.4 pp ▲ +9.3% 11/50
Households With 1 Vehicle 45.8%±2.8 pp 45.2%±0.4 pp ▲ +0.6% 20/50
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 18.3%±2.3 pp 28.2%±0.4 pp ▼ -9.9% 39/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Technology Access

Household Computer Access
No Computer or Smartphone 3.3% ±1.7 pp904 ±466
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 9.6% ±1.8 pp2,595 ±488
Desktop or Laptop Available 84.2% ±1.7 pp22,733 ±472
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
No Computer or Smartphone 3.3%±1.7 pp 5.1%±0.2 pp ▼ -1.7% 38/50
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 9.6%±1.8 pp 10.4%±0.3 pp ▼ -0.8% 32/50
Desktop or Laptop Available 84.2%±1.7 pp 79.7%±0.4 pp ▲ +4.4% 15/50
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access
Has Internet Access 94.8% ±1.5 pp25,615 ±406
↳ Cellular Data Plan Only 12.4% ±2.0 pp3,351 ±545
↳ Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 4.0% ±1.1 pp1,077 ±309
No Internet Access 5.2% ±1.8 pp1,400 ±484
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Has Internet Access 94.8%±1.5 pp 93.1%±0.3 pp ▲ +1.7% 13/50
↳ Cellular Data Plan Only 12.4%±2.0 pp 12.5%±0.3 pp ▼ -0.1% 27/50
↳ Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 4.0%±1.1 pp 3.9%±0.2 pp ▲ +0.1% 21/50
No Internet Access 5.2%±1.8 pp 6.9%±0.2 pp ▼ -1.7% 38/50
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance
Uninsured Residents 13.8% ±1.9 pp7,775 ±1,055
Uninsured Children Under 19 5.1% ±2.8 pp2,901 ±1,589
Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 16.7% ±2.3 pp9,446 ±1,315
Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 5.9% ±5.6 pp3,335 ±3,138
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Uninsured Residents 13.8%±1.9 pp 9.8%±0.2 pp ▲ +4.0% 10/50
Uninsured Children Under 19 5.1%±2.8 pp 3.9%±0.3 pp ▲ +1.3% 14/50
Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 16.7%±2.3 pp 13.3%±0.3 pp ▲ +3.4% 18/50
Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 5.9%±5.6 pp 1.7%±0.3 pp ▲ +4.2% 1/50
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types
Insured (Any Coverage) 86.2% ±1.9 pp47,377 ±1,025
Employer-Based Insurance 49.9% ±2.2 pp27,434 ±1,224
Direct-Purchase Insurance 9.9% ±1.2 pp5,429 ±684
Medicare 11.0% ±1.3 pp6,054 ±693
Medicaid 20.0% ±2.0 pp11,000 ±1,090
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.1% ±0.3 pp30 ±157
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 3.4% ±1.0 pp1,859 ±566
Uninsured 13.8% ±1.9 pp7,557 ±1,025
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Insured (Any Coverage) 86.2%±1.9 pp 90.2%±0.2 pp ▼ -4.0% 41/50
Employer-Based Insurance 49.9%±2.2 pp 51.2%±0.4 pp ▼ -1.3% 27/50
Direct-Purchase Insurance 9.9%±1.2 pp 8.5%±0.2 pp ▲ +1.4% 14/50
Medicare 11.0%±1.3 pp 12.6%±0.2 pp ▼ -1.6% 38/50
Medicaid 20.0%±2.0 pp 22.2%±0.3 pp ▼ -2.2% 30/50
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.1%±0.3 pp 0.3%±0.0 pp ▼ -0.2% 47/50
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 3.4%±1.0 pp 3.8%±0.1 pp ▼ -0.4% 27/50
Uninsured 13.8%±1.9 pp 9.8%±0.2 pp ▲ +4.0% 10/50
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability
Adults With at Least One Disability 15.8% ±1.7 pp7,497 ±813
Mobility Disability 5.6% ±1.0 pp2,649 ±470
Hearing Disability 1.6% ±0.5 pp739 ±231
Vision Disability 2.8% ±0.8 pp1,321 ±380
Cognitive Disability 9.0% ±1.4 pp4,256 ±677
Self-Care Disability 1.6% ±0.5 pp772 ±259
Independent Living Disability 4.4% ±0.7 pp2,096 ±353
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability 15.8%±1.7 pp 14.0%±0.2 pp ▲ +1.7% 16/50
Mobility Disability 5.6%±1.0 pp 7.6%±0.2 pp ▼ -2.0% 38/50
Hearing Disability 1.6%±0.5 pp 2.8%±0.1 pp ▼ -1.3% 48/50
Vision Disability 2.8%±0.8 pp 3.0%±0.1 pp ▼ -0.2% 25/50
Cognitive Disability 9.0%±1.4 pp 5.2%±0.1 pp ▲ +3.7% 2/50
Self-Care Disability 1.6%±0.5 pp 2.7%±0.1 pp ▼ -1.0% 41/50
Independent Living Disability 4.4%±0.7 pp 5.7%±0.2 pp ▼ -1.3% 38/50
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems
Arthritis 18.8%8,162
High Blood Pressure 28.3%12,317
Cancer 5.0%2,173
Current Asthma 10.4%4,511
Coronary Heart Disease 4.5%1,961
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 5.4%2,350
Diabetes 10.6%4,625
High Cholesterol 30.8%13,403
Obesity 32.2%14,007
Stroke 2.8%1,239
Lost All Natural Teeth 1.8%794
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adults 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES (modeled estimates; no margin of error)
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Arthritis 18.8% 19.6% ▼ -0.8% 29/50
High Blood Pressure 28.3% 29.7% ▼ -1.4% 26/50
Cancer 5.0% 5.0% ▼ -0.0% 25/50
Current Asthma 10.4% 10.2% ▲ +0.2% 19/50
Coronary Heart Disease 4.5% 4.8% ▼ -0.3% 34/50
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 5.4% 5.5% ▼ -0.1% 22/50
Diabetes 10.6% 12.0% ▼ -1.4% 33/50
High Cholesterol 30.8% 31.6% ▼ -0.8% 34/50
Obesity 32.2% 32.6% ▼ -0.4% 27/50
Stroke 2.8% 3.3% ▼ -0.5% 30/50
Lost All Natural Teeth 1.8% 2.5% ▼ -0.7% 34/50
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adults 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES (modeled estimates; no margin of error)

Health Risk Behaviors
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 19.8%8,612
Current Cigarette Smoking 12.0%5,224
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 22.4%9,760
Short Sleep Duration 37.7%16,411
Note: Binge drinking: 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking: smokes every day or some days. Physical inactivity: no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration: averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adults 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES (modeled estimates; no margin of error)
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 19.8% 19.0% ▲ +0.8% 20/50
Current Cigarette Smoking 12.0% 11.9% ▲ +0.1% 23/50
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 22.4% 24.7% ▼ -2.3% 31/50
Short Sleep Duration 37.7% 37.8% ▼ -0.1% 24/50
Note: Binge drinking: 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking: smokes every day or some days. Physical inactivity: no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration: averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adults 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES (modeled estimates; no margin of error)

Overall Health Status
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 19.3%8,380
Frequent Physical Distress 11.3%4,925
Note: Frequent physical distress: self-reported physical health not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adults 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES (modeled estimates; no margin of error)
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 19.3% 21.1% ▼ -1.8% 31/50
Frequent Physical Distress 11.3% 11.8% ▼ -0.5% 30/50
Note: Frequent physical distress: self-reported physical health not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adults 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES (modeled estimates; no margin of error)

Preventive Care
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 69.6%30,293
Routine Checkup in Past Year 75.6%32,898
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 85.5%37,215
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 55.1%23,997
Dental Visit in Past Year 58.5%25,441
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 73.3%31,902
Note: Universe: Adults 18 and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES (modeled estimates; no margin of error)
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES (modeled estimates; no margin of error)
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 69.6% 72.5% ▼ -2.9% 32/50
Routine Checkup in Past Year 75.6% 76.2% ▼ -0.6% 28/50
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 85.5% 86.2% ▼ -0.7% 32/50
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 55.1% 55.8% ▼ -0.7% 28/50
Dental Visit in Past Year 58.5% 58.4% ▲ +0.1% 23/50
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 73.3% 74.2% ▼ -0.9% 29/50
Note: Universe: Adults 18 and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES (modeled estimates; no margin of error)
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES (modeled estimates; no margin of error)

Mental Health
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 20.5%8,943
Frequent Mental Distress 16.7%7,263
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 26.9%11,717
Loneliness 35.3%15,354
Note: Frequent mental distress: mental health not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness: reports feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support: sometimes, rarely or never gets the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adults 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES (modeled estimates; no margin of error)
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 20.5% 19.1% ▲ +1.4% 7/50
Frequent Mental Distress 16.7% 16.0% ▲ +0.7% 20/50
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 26.9% 28.2% ▼ -1.3% 33/50
Loneliness 35.3% 35.8% ▼ -0.5% 29/50
Note: Frequent mental distress: mental health not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness: reports feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support: sometimes, rarely or never gets the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adults 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES (modeled estimates; no margin of error)

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 23.2% ±3.7 pp13,112 ±2,111
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 47.4% ±4.0 pp26,807 ±2,285
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 29.4% ±3.6 pp16,599 ±2,034
Homes Without Air Conditioning 6.8%3,836
Note: These categories show the share of residents with zero, 1–2, or 3+ Census-defined heat vulnerability risk factors. Risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation. Read more about how heat vulnerability is measured.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates
Category Ward 49 City Difference Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 23.2%±3.7 pp 26.1%±0.5 pp ▼ -2.9% 30/50
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 47.4%±4.0 pp 44.1%±0.6 pp ▲ +3.3% 10/50
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 29.4%±3.6 pp 29.8%±0.5 pp ▼ -0.4% 27/50
Homes Without Air Conditioning 6.8% 4.2% ▲ +2.6% 4/50
Note: These categories show the share of residents with zero, 1–2, or 3+ Census-defined heat vulnerability risk factors. Risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation. Read more about how heat vulnerability is measured.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

vs
Compare All Wards