Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category	Ward 41
Hispanic	16.5% ±2.4 pp9,597 ±1,386
White	69.1% ±1.1 pp40,179 ±646
Black	2.2% ±1.6 pp1,307 ±948
Asian	8.0% ±1.3 pp4,658 ±774
Other or Multi-racial	4.1% ±1.0 pp2,365 ±563
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Hispanic	16.5%±2.4 pp9,597±1,386	29.7%±0.2 pp805,318±5,785	▼ -13.2%	31/50
White	69.1%±1.1 pp40,179±646	32.1%±0.2 pp870,127±5,557	▲ +37.1%	5/50
Black	2.2%±1.6 pp1,307±948	27.4%±0.2 pp743,710±6,047	▼ -25.2%	46/50
Asian	8.0%±1.3 pp4,658±774	7.2%±0.2 pp196,435±4,370	▲ +0.8%	16/50
Other or Multi-racial	4.1%±1.0 pp2,365±563	3.5%±0.1 pp95,636±3,778	▲ +0.5%	20/50
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Hispanic	11.6% ±1.5 pp6,327 ±792	13.3% ±1.3 pp7,309 ±732	16.5% ±2.4 pp9,597 ±1,386	▲ +4.9 pp▲ +3,270▲ +3.2 pp▲ +2,288▲ +1.6 pp▲ +982
Chicago citywide	28.9% ±0.2 pp785,292 ±4,750	28.8% ±0.2 pp780,167 ±5,832	29.7% ±0.2 pp805,318 ±5,785	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +20,026▲ +0.9 pp▲ +25,151▼ −0.2 pp▼ −5,125
White	80.1% ±1.8 pp43,506 ±958	76.4% ±1.6 pp42,005 ±854	69.1% ±1.1 pp40,179 ±646	▼ −10.9 pp▼ −3,327▼ −7.2 pp▼ −1,826▼ −3.7 pp▼ −1,501
Chicago citywide	32.2% ±0.2 pp872,513 ±4,319	33.3% ±0.2 pp901,769 ±4,468	32.1% ±0.2 pp870,127 ±5,557	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2,386▼ −1.2 pp▼ −31,642▲ +1.1 pp▲ +29,256
Black	1.0% ±0.5 pp544 ±291	1.0% ±0.5 pp559 ±277	2.2% ±1.6 pp1,307 ±948	▲ +1.2 pp▲ +763▲ +1.2 pp▲ +748– 0.0 pp▲ +15
Chicago citywide	31.5% ±0.1 pp853,214 ±3,755	29.2% ±0.2 pp790,893 ±4,690	27.4% ±0.2 pp743,710 ±6,047	▼ −4.0 pp▼ −109,504▼ −1.8 pp▼ −47,183▼ −2.3 pp▼ −62,321
Asian	5.1% ±1.0 pp2,781 ±561	6.3% ±1.1 pp3,488 ±631	8.0% ±1.3 pp4,658 ±774	▲ +2.9 pp▲ +1,877▲ +1.7 pp▲ +1,170▲ +1.2 pp▲ +707
Chicago citywide	5.7% ±0.1 pp154,287 ±2,942	6.5% ±0.1 pp177,195 ±3,532	7.2% ±0.2 pp196,435 ±4,370	▲ +1.6 pp▲ +42,148▲ +0.7 pp▲ +19,240▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,908
Other or Multi-racial	2.1% ±0.8 pp1,162 ±457	3.0% ±0.8 pp1,651 ±449	4.1% ±1.0 pp2,365 ±563	▲ +1.9 pp▲ +1,203▲ +1.1 pp▲ +714▲ +0.9 pp▲ +489
Chicago citywide	1.7% ±0.1 pp47,302 ±1,990	2.2% ±0.1 pp59,510 ±2,584	3.5% ±0.1 pp95,636 ±3,778	▲ +1.8 pp▲ +48,334▲ +1.3 pp▲ +36,126▲ +0.5 pp▲ +12,208

Age Distribution

Category	Ward 41
Under 5	6.2% ±1.0 pp3,610 ±557
5-17	16.3% ±1.4 pp9,470 ±796
18-24	6.1% ±0.9 pp3,534 ±495
25-44	27.7% ±1.5 pp16,067 ±878
45-64	26.3% ±1.3 pp15,308 ±766
65-74	9.8% ±1.0 pp5,711 ±597
75-84	4.6% ±0.6 pp2,698 ±354
85+	2.9% ±0.6 pp1,706 ±320
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Under 5	6.2%±1.0 pp3,610±557	5.3%±0.1 pp144,044±3,726	▲ +0.9%	8/50
5-17	16.3%±1.4 pp9,470±796	14.1%±0.2 pp381,582±5,292	▲ +2.2%	19/50
18-24	6.1%±0.9 pp3,534±495	9.6%±0.2 pp260,942±4,703	▼ -3.5%	48/50
25-44	27.7%±1.5 pp16,067±878	34.3%±0.2 pp929,946±6,124	▼ -6.6%	32/50
45-64	26.3%±1.3 pp15,308±766	22.9%±0.2 pp620,047±5,184	▲ +3.5%	5/50
65-74	9.8%±1.0 pp5,711±597	8.2%±0.1 pp221,932±3,538	▲ +1.6%	12/50
75-84	4.6%±0.6 pp2,698±354	4.0%±0.1 pp107,625±2,624	▲ +0.7%	15/50
85+	2.9%±0.6 pp1,706±320	1.7%±0.1 pp45,108±1,900	▲ +1.3%	4/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category	Ward 41
No High School Diploma	6.0% ±1.3 pp2,481 ±520
High School Diploma or GED	22.7% ±2.1 pp9,420 ±861
Some College or Associate's Degree	23.1% ±2.0 pp9,595 ±838
Bachelor's Degree	29.1% ±2.1 pp12,045 ±850
Graduate Degree	19.1% ±1.8 pp7,904 ±760
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
No High School Diploma	6.0%±1.3 pp2,481±520	12.8%±0.2 pp246,015±4,665	▼ -6.8%	40/50
High School Diploma or GED	22.7%±2.1 pp9,420±861	21.1%±0.3 pp405,248±5,594	▲ +1.7%	26/50
Some College or Associate's Degree	23.1%±2.0 pp9,595±838	21.8%±0.3 pp419,911±5,261	▲ +1.3%	22/50
Bachelor's Degree	29.1%±2.1 pp12,045±850	25.4%±0.3 pp488,467±5,561	▲ +3.7%	19/50
Graduate Degree	19.1%±1.8 pp7,904±760	19.0%±0.3 pp365,017±4,874	▲ +0.1%	20/50
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category	Ward 41
Total Population	58,106 ±2,531
Total Households	23,529 ±868
Population Density	3,409 ±148 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	Average Ward	Difference
Total Population	58,106	54,206	▲ +3,900
Total Households	23,529	23,200	▲ +329
Population Density	3,409 people/sq mi	16,281 people/sq mi	▼ −12,872
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average ward rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large wards. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19	Difference	Rank
Total Population	54,319 ±1,621	55,012 ±1,402	58,106 ±2,531	▲ +3,787 ±3,005▲ +3,094 ±2,893▲ +693 ±2,143	▲ +89▲ +846▲ +3,900	27/5024/506/50
Average Ward	54,230	54,166	54,206	▼ −24▲ +40▼ −64
Total Households	21,933 ±433	22,935 ±422	23,529 ±868	▲ +1,596 ±970▲ +594 ±965▲ +1,002 ±605	▲ +1,365▲ +1,615▲ +329	16/5015/5020/50
Average Ward	20,568	21,320	23,200	▲ +2,631▲ +1,880▲ +751
Population Density (per sq mi)	3,187 ±95	3,227 ±82	3,409 ±148	▲ +222▲ +182▲ +41	▼ −12,729▼ −12,885▼ −12,872	49/5049/5049/50
Average Ward Density	15,916	16,112	16,281	▲ +366▲ +169▲ +196

Household Size

Category	Ward 41
Average Household Size	2.45±0.11
1-Person Households	32.0% ±2.7 pp7,524 ±638
2-Person Households	27.8% ±2.2 pp6,544 ±516
3-Person Households	17.2% ±1.9 pp4,045 ±437
4+ Person Households	23.0% ±2.2 pp5,416 ±524
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Size	2.45±0.11	2.29±0.02	▲ +0.16	26/50
1-Person Households	32.0%±2.7 pp7,524±638	39.7%±0.4 pp460,268±4,301	▼ -7.7%	31/50
2-Person Households	27.8%±2.2 pp6,544±516	29.5%±0.4 pp342,235±4,195	▼ -1.7%	31/50
3-Person Households	17.2%±1.9 pp4,045±437	12.9%±0.3 pp149,291±3,231	▲ +4.3%	3/50
4+ Person Households	23.0%±2.2 pp5,416±524	18.0%±0.3 pp208,411±4,023	▲ +5.1%	17/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category	Ward 41
Never Married	30.7% ±2.1 pp14,384 ±961
Married	54.4% ±3.1 pp25,459 ±1,454
Separated	1.1% ±0.4 pp500 ±188
Divorced	8.5% ±1.1 pp3,993 ±492
Widowed	5.3% ±0.8 pp2,457 ±363
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Never Married	30.7%±2.1 pp14,384±961	49.6%±0.3 pp1,130,286±6,623	▼ -18.9%	50/50
Married	54.4%±3.1 pp25,459±1,454	35.5%±0.3 pp807,294±6,077	▲ +19.0%	1/50
Separated	1.1%±0.4 pp500±188	2.2%±0.1 pp49,430±2,379	▼ -1.1%	42/50
Divorced	8.5%±1.1 pp3,993±492	7.9%±0.2 pp180,700±3,966	▲ +0.6%	17/50
Widowed	5.3%±0.8 pp2,457±363	4.8%±0.1 pp109,357±2,738	▲ +0.4%	22/50
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category	Ward 41
Speak English Only	60.9% ±2.4 pp33,113 ±1,305
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic	15.1% ±2.3 pp8,220 ±1,249
Spanish	9.1% ±1.6 pp4,927 ±861
Other Languages	4.5% ±1.9 pp2,427 ±1,049
Other Indo-European	4.2% ±1.1 pp2,296 ±621
Other Asian and Pacific Island	2.6% ±1.0 pp1,396 ±517
Arabic	2.3% ±1.0 pp1,254 ±563
Tagalog (incl. Filipino)	1.4% ±0.5 pp772 ±298
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this ward, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Speak English Only	60.9%±2.4 pp33,113±1,305	64.6%±0.3 pp1,659,069±8,218	▼ -3.8%	30/50
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic	15.1%±2.3 pp8,220±1,249	2.6%±0.1 pp67,932±3,529	▲ +12.5%	1/30
Spanish	9.1%±1.6 pp4,927±861	23.7%±0.2 pp607,865±6,166	▼ -14.6%	33/50
Other Languages	4.5%±1.9 pp2,427±1,049	1.0%±0.1 pp25,292±2,452	▲ +3.5%	8/50
Other Indo-European	4.2%±1.1 pp2,296±621	2.4%±0.1 pp61,672±3,192	▲ +1.8%	9/27
Other Asian and Pacific Island	2.6%±1.0 pp1,396±517	0.9%±0.1 pp22,472±2,251	▲ +1.7%	3/16
Arabic	2.3%±1.0 pp1,254±563	0.5%±0.1 pp13,601±1,716	▲ +1.8%	1/6
Tagalog (incl. Filipino)	1.4%±0.5 pp772±298	0.8%±0.1 pp20,222±1,843	▲ +0.6%	8/10
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this ward, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 41
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	85.8% ±1.6 pp85.8%±1.6 pp46,783 ±863
Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents age 5+)	14.2% ±1.7 pp14.2%±1.7 pp7,713 ±934
↳ Speaks English Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	9.6% ±1.4 pp67.5%±5.5 pp5,209 ±760
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	3.7% ±0.9 pp26.3%±5.7 pp2,026 ±505
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	0.9% ±0.6 pp6.2%±3.8 pp478 ±302
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	85.8%±1.6 pp85.8%±1.6 pp46,783±863	85.4%±0.5 pp85.4%±0.5 pp2,192,778±11,961	▲ +0.4%▲ +0.4%	26/50
Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents age 5+)	14.2%±1.7 pp14.2%±1.7 pp7,713±934	14.6%±0.3 pp14.6%±0.3 pp374,404±6,794	▼ -0.4%▼ -0.4%	25/50
↳ Speaks English Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	9.6%±1.4 pp67.5%±5.5 pp5,209±760	7.1%±0.2 pp48.9%±0.9 pp183,252±4,686	▲ +2.4%▲ +18.6%	17/507/50
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	3.7%±0.9 pp26.3%±5.7 pp2,026±505	5.2%±0.2 pp35.6%±0.8 pp133,269±3,923	▼ -1.5%▼ -9.3%	28/5041/50
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	0.9%±0.6 pp6.2%±3.8 pp478±302	2.3%±0.1 pp15.5%±0.7 pp57,883±2,982	▼ -1.4%▼ -9.3%	33/5042/50
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category	Ward 41
Married-Couple Households	51.2% ±2.2 pp12,037 ±526
Unmarried-Couple Households	4.8% ±1.1 pp1,128 ±267
One-Person Households	32.0% ±3.2 pp7,524 ±752
Other Household Types	12.1% ±5.9 pp2,840 ±1,390
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Married-Couple Households	51.2%±2.2 pp12,037±526	30.9%±0.3 pp358,432±3,598	▲ +20.3%	2/50
Unmarried-Couple Households	4.8%±1.1 pp1,128±267	8.3%±0.2 pp96,220±2,797	▼ -3.5%	43/50
One-Person Households	32.0%±3.2 pp7,524±752	39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,729	▼ -7.7%	31/50
Other Household Types	12.1%±5.9 pp2,840±1,390	21.1%±0.7 pp245,285±8,514	▼ -9.1%	44/50
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category	Ward 41
Children in Married-Couple Households	84.7% ±3.4 pp11,002 ±446
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	4.1% ±2.8 pp528 ±363
Children in Single-Mother Households	7.7% ±2.3 pp997 ±294
Children in Single-Father Households	3.5% ±2.0 pp456 ±262
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households	84.7%±3.4 pp11,002±446	56.0%±0.8 pp293,542±4,257	▲ +28.7%	6/50
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	4.1%±2.8 pp528±363	8.8%±0.6 pp45,960±3,208	▼ -4.7%	41/50
Children in Single-Mother Households	7.7%±2.3 pp997±294	30.6%±0.9 pp160,535±4,521	▼ -22.9%	46/50
Children in Single-Father Households	3.5%±2.0 pp456±262	4.6%±0.4 pp24,133±2,006	▼ -1.1%	35/50
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 41
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	4.2% ±0.9 pp4.2%±0.9 pp1,881 ±400
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	25.2% ±11.9 pp1.1%±0.5 pp474 ±223
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	18.1% ±7.7 pp0.8%±0.3 pp341 ±145
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	25.4% ±7.7 pp1.1%±0.3 pp478 ±145
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	5.1% ±4.9 pp0.2%±0.2 pp95 ±92
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	26.2% ±11.3 pp1.1%±0.5 pp493 ±213
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	4.2%±0.9 pp4.2%±0.9 pp1,881±400	2.8%±0.1 pp2.8%±0.1 pp60,766±2,397	▲ +1.4%▲ +1.4%	7/50
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	25.2%±11.9 pp1.1%±0.5 pp474±223	26.8%±1.8 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,267±1,067	▼ -1.6%▲ +0.3%	31/5010/50
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	18.1%±7.7 pp0.8%±0.3 pp341±145	12.9%±1.0 pp0.4%±0.0 pp7,830±579	▲ +5.3%▲ +0.4%	11/509/50
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	25.4%±7.7 pp1.1%±0.3 pp478±145	28.8%±1.4 pp0.8%±0.0 pp17,525±846	▼ -3.5%▲ +0.3%	34/5013/50
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	5.1%±4.9 pp0.2%±0.2 pp95±92	4.9%±0.7 pp0.1%±0.0 pp2,995±441	▲ +0.1%▲ +0.1%	20/5013/50
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	26.2%±11.3 pp1.1%±0.5 pp493±213	26.6%±1.5 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,149±916	▼ -0.4%▲ +0.4%	26/5011/50
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 41
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	73.5% ±1.5 pp73.5%±1.5 pp42,711 ±887
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	26.5% ±1.9 pp26.5%±1.9 pp15,395 ±1,109
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	17.0% ±1.6 pp64.1%±4.0 pp9,864 ±942
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	9.5% ±1.2 pp35.9%±3.8 pp5,531 ±713
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	73.5%±1.5 pp73.5%±1.5 pp42,711±887	79.1%±0.3 pp79.1%±0.3 pp2,144,343±7,926	▼ -5.6%▼ -5.6%	35/50
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	26.5%±1.9 pp26.5%±1.9 pp15,395±1,109	20.9%±0.3 pp20.9%±0.3 pp566,883±7,968	▲ +5.6%▲ +5.6%	16/50
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	17.0%±1.6 pp64.1%±4.0 pp9,864±942	10.0%±0.2 pp47.7%±0.5 pp270,551±4,603	▲ +7.0%▲ +16.3%	8/503/50
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	9.5%±1.2 pp35.9%±3.8 pp5,531±713	10.9%±0.2 pp52.3%±0.9 pp296,332±6,504	▼ -1.4%▼ -16.3%	29/5048/50
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show

Category	Ward 41
Born in Poland (of foreign-born residents)	6.3%±1.2 pp23.8%±3.9 pp3,656±676
Born in Ukraine (of foreign-born residents)	1.9%±0.8 pp7.3%±2.9 pp1,118±452
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents)	1.8%±0.6 pp6.7%±2.0 pp1,029±324
Born in India (of foreign-born residents)	1.6%±0.7 pp6.1%±2.4 pp940±383
Born in Philippines (of foreign-born residents)	1.5%±0.5 pp5.8%±2.0 pp885±311
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	11.1%41.8%6,422
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	Chicago	Difference	Rank
Born in Poland (of foreign-born residents)	6.3% ±1.2 pp23.8%±3.9 pp3,656	1.0% ±0.1 pp4.6%26,188	▲ +5.3%▲ +19.2%	2/502/50
Born in Ukraine (of foreign-born residents)	1.9% ±0.8 pp7.3%±2.9 pp1,118	0.3% ±0.0 pp1.5%8,599	▲ +1.6%▲ +5.8%	1/501/50
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents)	1.8% ±0.6 pp6.7%±2.0 pp1,029	8.2% ±0.2 pp39.3%222,978	▼ -6.4%▼ -32.6%	36/5045/50
Born in India (of foreign-born residents)	1.6% ±0.7 pp6.1%±2.4 pp940	1.0% ±0.1 pp5.0%28,235	▲ +0.6%▲ +1.1%	10/5019/50
Born in Philippines (of foreign-born residents)	1.5% ±0.5 pp5.8%±2.0 pp885	0.8% ±0.1 pp3.8%21,740	▲ +0.7%▲ +1.9%	7/509/50
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	11.1%41.8%6,422	——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show

Category	Ward 41
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	8.4% ±1.3 pp31.7%±4.5 pp4,878 ±782
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	5.9% ±1.1 pp22.3%±3.8 pp3,420 ±641
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	5.1% ±0.9 pp19.2%±3.2 pp2,948 ±533
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	7.1% ±0.9 pp26.8%±2.8 pp4,121 ±527
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	8.4%±1.3 pp31.7%±4.5 pp4,878±782	5.9%±0.2 pp1037.5%±85.6 pp159,447±5,557	▲ +2.5%▼ -1005.8%	11/5023/50
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	5.9%±1.1 pp22.3%±3.8 pp3,420±641	4.5%±0.1 pp793.3%±64.9 pp121,912±4,035	▲ +1.4%▼ -771.0%	15/5020/50
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	5.1%±0.9 pp19.2%±3.2 pp2,948±533	4.6%±0.1 pp805.9%±65.4 pp123,849±3,901	▲ +0.5%▼ -786.7%	22/5033/50
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	7.1%±0.9 pp26.8%±2.8 pp4,121±527	6.0%±0.1 pp1052.0%±81.9 pp161,675±3,491	▲ +1.1%▼ -1025.2%	21/5026/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later	1.1% ±0.5 pp605 ±249	5.0% ±1.0 pp2,733 ±573	8.4% ±1.3 pp4,878 ±782	▲ +7.3 pp▲ +4,273▲ +3.4 pp▲ +2,145▲ +3.9 pp▲ +2,128
Chicago citywide	1.4% ±0.1 pp36,978 ±2,235	3.7% ±0.1 pp99,118 ±3,198	5.9% ±0.2 pp159,447 ±5,568	▲ +4.5 pp▲ +122,469▲ +2.2 pp▲ +60,329▲ +2.3 pp▲ +62,140
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009	7.9% ±1.2 pp4,294 ±668	6.7% ±1.2 pp3,675 ±641	5.9% ±1.1 pp3,420 ±641	▼ −2.0 pp▼ −874▼ −0.8 pp▼ −255▼ −1.2 pp▼ −619
Chicago citywide	5.9% ±0.1 pp161,331 ±3,896	4.9% ±0.1 pp131,658 ±3,182	4.5% ±0.1 pp121,912 ±4,044	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −39,419▼ −0.4 pp▼ −9,746▼ −1.1 pp▼ −29,673
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999	6.5% ±1.2 pp3,537 ±627	4.7% ±0.9 pp2,577 ±482	5.1% ±0.9 pp2,948 ±533	▼ −1.4 pp▼ −589▲ +0.4 pp▲ +371▼ −1.8 pp▼ −960
Chicago citywide	6.1% ±0.1 pp165,077 ±3,717	5.3% ±0.1 pp142,413 ±3,015	4.6% ±0.1 pp123,849 ±3,911	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −41,228▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,564▼ −0.8 pp▼ −22,664
Entered the U.S. Before 1990	10.3% ±1.2 pp5,590 ±636	8.7% ±0.9 pp4,765 ±507	7.1% ±0.9 pp4,121 ±527	▼ −3.2 pp▼ −1,469▼ −1.6 pp▼ −644▼ −1.6 pp▼ −825
Chicago citywide	7.5% ±0.1 pp204,169 ±3,469	6.9% ±0.1 pp186,050 ±3,114	6.0% ±0.1 pp161,675 ±3,509	▼ −1.6 pp▼ −42,494▼ −0.9 pp▼ −24,375▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,119

Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category	Ward 41
Average Household Income	$131,279±$7,013
Per Capita Income	$54,025±$2,819
10th Percentile Household Income	$23,639±$2,373
25th Percentile Household Income	$52,000±$4,224
Median Household Income	$105,226±$6,717
75th Percentile Household Income	$175,270±$7,233
90th Percentile Household Income	Over $200,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$131,279±$7,013	$116,016±$1,263	▲ +$15,263	12/50
Per Capita Income	$54,025±$2,819	$50,086±$581	▲ +$3,939	13/50
10th Percentile Household Income	$23,639±$2,373	$12,933±$271	▲ +$10,705	9/50
25th Percentile Household Income	$52,000±$4,224	$34,575±$649	▲ +$17,425	11/50
Median Household Income	$105,226±$6,717	$77,902±$907	▲ +$27,324	9/50
75th Percentile Household Income	$175,270±$7,233	$144,150±$1,210	▲ +$31,120	12/50
90th Percentile Household Income	Over $200,000	Over $200,000	—	1/50
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$105,922 ±3,755	$123,925 ±4,947	$131,279 ±7,013	▲ +$25,357▲ +$7,353▲ +$18,004
Chicago citywide	$95,689 ±910	$111,304 ±1,075	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$20,327▲ +$4,712▲ +$15,615
Average Household Income (nominal dollars)	$79,937 ±2,834	$100,999 ±4,032	$131,279 ±7,013	▲ +$51,342▲ +$30,279▲ +$21,062
Chicago citywide	$72,215 ±687	$90,713 ±876	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$43,801▲ +$25,303▲ +$18,498
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$44,437 ±1,216	$53,144 ±1,907	$54,025 ±2,819	▲ +$9,589▲ +$881▲ +$8,708
Chicago citywide	$37,927 ±351	$45,525 ±412	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$12,160▲ +$4,562▲ +$7,598
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars)	$33,536 ±918	$43,313 ±1,555	$54,025 ±2,819	▲ +$20,490▲ +$10,713▲ +$9,777
Chicago citywide	$28,623 ±265	$37,103 ±336	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$21,464▲ +$12,984▲ +$8,480
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$21,320 ±1,771	$20,545 ±1,846	$23,639 ±2,373	▲ +$2,318▲ +$3,093▼ −$775
Chicago citywide	$11,828 ±190	$13,281 ±277	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$1,105▼ −$348▲ +$1,453
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$16,090 ±1,336	$16,745 ±1,504	$23,639 ±2,373	▲ +$7,548▲ +$6,894▲ +$655
Chicago citywide	$8,927 ±144	$10,824 ±225	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$4,007▲ +$2,109▲ +$1,898
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$41,635 ±3,458	$47,955 ±4,537	$52,000 ±4,224	▲ +$10,365▲ +$4,046▲ +$6,319
Chicago citywide	$28,727 ±321	$31,597 ±462	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$5,848▲ +$2,979▲ +$2,869
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$31,422 ±2,610	$39,083 ±3,697	$52,000 ±4,224	▲ +$20,579▲ +$12,917▲ +$7,662
Chicago citywide	$21,680 ±242	$25,751 ±376	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$12,895▲ +$8,824▲ +$4,071
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$85,554 ±4,716	$94,629 ±4,950	$105,226 ±6,717	▲ +$19,672▲ +$10,597▲ +$9,075
Chicago citywide	$63,379 ±591	$71,469 ±723	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$14,523▲ +$6,433▲ +$8,090
Median Household Income (nominal dollars)	$64,566 ±3,559	$77,123 ±4,034	$105,226 ±6,717	▲ +$40,659▲ +$28,103▲ +$12,557
Chicago citywide	$47,831 ±446	$58,247 ±589	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$30,071▲ +$19,655▲ +$10,416
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$141,785 ±6,317	$164,136 ±8,197	$175,270 ±7,233	▲ +$33,485▲ +$11,134▲ +$22,351
Chicago citywide	$122,019 ±806	$139,501 ±1,057	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$22,131▲ +$4,648▲ +$17,482
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$107,003 ±4,767	$133,771 ±6,680	$175,270 ±7,233	▲ +$68,267▲ +$41,499▲ +$26,768
Chicago citywide	$92,086 ±608	$113,694 ±862	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$52,064▲ +$30,456▲ +$21,608
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$218,529 ±12,098	—	—	———
Chicago citywide	$202,601 ±2,442	$235,390 ±1,636	—	——▲ +$32,790
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$164,920 ±9,130	—	—	———
Chicago citywide	$152,899 ±1,843	$191,844 ±1,333	—	——▲ +$38,944

Poverty Status

Category	Ward 41
Below Poverty Line	6.6% ±1.6 pp3,838 ±906
Below 200% Poverty Line	17.2% ±2.4 pp9,993 ±1,386
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	2.6% ±0.7 pp1,528 ±405
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Below Poverty Line	6.6%±1.6 pp3,838±906	16.8%±0.4 pp456,194±11,330	▼ -10.2%	48/50
Below 200% Poverty Line	17.2%±2.4 pp9,993±1,386	33.4%±0.6 pp905,794±16,660	▼ -16.2%	41/50
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	2.6%±0.7 pp1,528±405	8.3%±0.3 pp226,117±7,649	▼ -5.7%	50/50
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Category	Ward 41
Food Insecurity	11.4%5,111
Housing Insecurity	9.8%4,363
Transportation Barriers	5.9%2,629
Threatened Utility Shutoff	5.4%2,424
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Food Insecurity	11.4%5,111	24.4%509,385	▼ -13.0%	42/50
Housing Insecurity	9.8%4,363	19.7%411,266	▼ -9.9%	43/50
Transportation Barriers	5.9%2,629	11.6%242,167	▼ -5.7%	43/50
Threatened Utility Shutoff	5.4%2,424	11.9%248,430	▼ -6.5%	43/50
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category	Ward 41
In Labor Force	92.1% ±1.6 pp22,168 ±386
↳ Employed	87.9% ±1.8 pp21,159 ±435
↳ Unemployed	4.2% ±1.3 pp1,009 ±321
↳ Unemployment Rate	4.6% ±1.4 pp—
Not in Labor Force	7.9% ±7.3 pp1,905 ±1,757
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
In Labor Force	92.1%±1.6 pp22,168±386	85.6%±0.3 pp1,069,076±3,571	▲ +6.5%	8/50
↳ Employed	87.9%±1.8 pp21,159±435	79.6%±0.3 pp994,466±4,015	▲ +8.3%	9/50
↳ Unemployed	4.2%±1.3 pp1,009±321	5.9%±0.2 pp73,968±2,565	▼ -1.7%	36/50
↳ Unemployment Rate	4.6%±1.4 pp—	6.9%±0.2 pp86,502±3,074	▼ -2.4%	38/50
Not in Labor Force	7.9%±7.3 pp1,905±1,757	14.4%±1.1 pp180,399±13,145	▼ -6.5%	43/50
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category	Ward 41
Management, Business, Science & Arts	46.7% ±3.0 pp14,295 ±918
↳ Management Occupations	12.2% ±1.6 pp3,724 ±502
↳ Business & Financial Operations	6.0% ±1.1 pp1,835 ±334
↳ Computer & Mathematical	4.3% ±1.0 pp1,307 ±321
↳ Architecture & Engineering	1.9% ±0.7 pp582 ±201
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	1.4% ±0.6 pp435 ±197
↳ Community & Social Service	1.2% ±0.6 pp360 ±177
↳ Legal Occupations	1.7% ±0.6 pp517 ±181
↳ Education, Training & Library	8.5% ±1.4 pp2,592 ±439
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	2.1% ±0.8 pp649 ±254
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	5.2% ±1.0 pp1,606 ±298
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	2.2% ±1.0 pp688 ±301
Service	19.2% ±2.4 pp5,888 ±720
↳ Healthcare Support	2.2% ±0.7 pp666 ±228
↳ Protective Service	7.8% ±1.4 pp2,400 ±420
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	3.5% ±1.0 pp1,086 ±292
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	2.8% ±1.3 pp864 ±385
↳ Personal Care & Service	2.8% ±0.9 pp871 ±268
Sales & Office	16.3% ±2.0 pp4,998 ±621
↳ Sales & Related	6.8% ±1.2 pp2,074 ±368
↳ Office & Administrative Support	9.6% ±1.5 pp2,924 ±470
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	6.6% ±1.5 pp2,009 ±448
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.1% ±0.3 pp21 ±88
↳ Construction & Extraction	4.5% ±1.3 pp1,391 ±410
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	2.0% ±0.7 pp597 ±222
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	11.2% ±1.7 pp3,420 ±528
↳ Production Occupations	4.5% ±1.2 pp1,376 ±367
↳ Transportation Occupations	4.7% ±1.2 pp1,449 ±371
↳ Material Moving Occupations	1.9% ±0.8 pp595 ±244
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts	46.7%±3.0 pp14,295±918	49.2%±0.4 pp686,743±5,710	▼ -2.5%	23/50
↳ Management Occupations	12.2%±1.6 pp3,724±502	12.3%±0.3 pp172,182±3,807	▼ -0.2%	18/50
↳ Business & Financial Operations	6.0%±1.1 pp1,835±334	9.1%±0.2 pp127,081±3,358	▼ -3.1%	29/50
↳ Computer & Mathematical	4.3%±1.0 pp1,307±321	4.9%±0.2 pp68,921±2,690	▼ -0.7%	20/50
↳ Architecture & Engineering	1.9%±0.7 pp582±201	1.6%±0.1 pp22,779±1,380	▲ +0.3%	15/50
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	1.4%±0.6 pp435±197	1.4%±0.1 pp19,126±1,340	▲ +0.1%	21/50
↳ Community & Social Service	1.2%±0.6 pp360±177	1.9%±0.1 pp26,973±1,500	▼ -0.8%	44/50
↳ Legal Occupations	1.7%±0.6 pp517±181	2.3%±0.1 pp31,629±1,814	▼ -0.6%	21/50
↳ Education, Training & Library	8.5%±1.4 pp2,592±439	6.6%±0.2 pp92,316±2,697	▲ +1.9%	8/50
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	2.1%±0.8 pp649±254	3.1%±0.1 pp43,879±1,786	▼ -1.0%	30/50
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	5.2%±1.0 pp1,606±298	4.6%±0.2 pp63,551±2,652	▲ +0.7%	15/50
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	2.2%±1.0 pp688±301	1.3%±0.1 pp18,306±1,387	▲ +0.9%	5/50
Service	19.2%±2.4 pp5,888±720	16.9%±0.3 pp235,977±4,217	▲ +2.3%	26/50
↳ Healthcare Support	2.2%±0.7 pp666±228	3.4%±0.2 pp46,792±2,107	▼ -1.2%	40/50
↳ Protective Service	7.8%±1.4 pp2,400±420	2.8%±0.1 pp39,146±1,734	▲ +5.0%	2/50
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	3.5%±1.0 pp1,086±292	5.1%±0.2 pp70,514±2,393	▼ -1.5%	40/50
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	2.8%±1.3 pp864±385	3.0%±0.1 pp41,783±1,967	▼ -0.2%	31/50
↳ Personal Care & Service	2.8%±0.9 pp871±268	2.7%±0.1 pp37,742±1,657	▲ +0.1%	22/50
Sales & Office	16.3%±2.0 pp4,998±621	17.4%±0.3 pp243,580±4,754	▼ -1.1%	35/50
↳ Sales & Related	6.8%±1.2 pp2,074±368	8.1%±0.2 pp113,073±3,174	▼ -1.3%	41/50
↳ Office & Administrative Support	9.6%±1.5 pp2,924±470	9.3%±0.3 pp130,507±3,591	▲ +0.2%	25/50
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	6.6%±1.5 pp2,009±448	4.6%±0.2 pp64,338±2,929	▲ +2.0%	18/50
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.1%±0.3 pp21±88	0.1%±0.0 pp1,506±406	0%	23/50
↳ Construction & Extraction	4.5%±1.3 pp1,391±410	2.8%±0.1 pp39,432±2,062	▲ +1.7%	15/50
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	2.0%±0.7 pp597±222	1.7%±0.1 pp23,400±1,722	▲ +0.3%	20/50
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	11.2%±1.7 pp3,420±528	11.8%±0.3 pp165,261±3,629	▼ -0.7%	33/50
↳ Production Occupations	4.5%±1.2 pp1,376±367	4.2%±0.2 pp57,989±2,275	▲ +0.3%	27/50
↳ Transportation Occupations	4.7%±1.2 pp1,449±371	3.9%±0.2 pp54,099±2,118	▲ +0.9%	22/50
↳ Material Moving Occupations	1.9%±0.8 pp595±244	3.8%±0.2 pp53,173±2,312	▼ -1.9%	39/50
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category	Ward 41
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.3% ±0.4 pp95 ±107
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	0.3% ±0.4 pp95 ±107
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0% ±0.3 pp0
Construction	5.5% ±1.3 pp1,685 ±412
Manufacturing	8.1% ±1.3 pp2,477 ±411
Wholesale Trade	1.6% ±0.6 pp478 ±189
Retail Trade	5.7% ±1.1 pp1,745 ±322
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	9.1% ±1.7 pp2,789 ±528
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	8.2% ±1.7 pp2,515 ±527
↳ Utilities	0.9% ±0.5 pp274 ±165
Information	1.4% ±0.5 pp419 ±154
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	7.6% ±1.2 pp2,326 ±360
↳ Finance & Insurance	5.3% ±1.0 pp1,617 ±299
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	2.3% ±0.7 pp709 ±224
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	13.7% ±1.9 pp4,204 ±578
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	9.6% ±1.5 pp2,953 ±465
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.1% ±0.3 pp20 ±86
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	4.0% ±1.2 pp1,231 ±360
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	24.3% ±2.0 pp7,442 ±616
↳ Educational Services	11.7% ±1.6 pp3,571 ±483
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	12.6% ±1.6 pp3,872 ±491
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	7.4% ±1.3 pp2,264 ±404
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	2.8% ±0.8 pp855 ±257
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	4.6% ±1.1 pp1,409 ±328
Other Services	5.4% ±1.2 pp1,659 ±356
Public Administration	9.9% ±1.4 pp3,027 ±415
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.3%±0.4 pp95±107	0.2%±0.0 pp—	▲ +0.1%	9/50
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	0.3%±0.4 pp95±107	0.2%±0.0 pp—	▲ +0.1%	7/50
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%±0.3 pp0	0.0%±0.0 pp—	0%	23/50
Construction	5.5%±1.3 pp1,685±412	3.8%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.7%	15/50
Manufacturing	8.1%±1.3 pp2,477±411	7.7%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.4%	20/50
Wholesale Trade	1.6%±0.6 pp478±189	2.0%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.5%	36/50
Retail Trade	5.7%±1.1 pp1,745±322	8.2%±0.2 pp—	▼ -2.5%	44/50
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	9.1%±1.7 pp2,789±528	7.1%±0.2 pp—	▲ +2.0%	18/50
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	8.2%±1.7 pp2,515±527	6.5%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.7%	18/50
↳ Utilities	0.9%±0.5 pp274±165	0.5%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.4%	9/50
Information	1.4%±0.5 pp419±154	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.8%	37/50
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	7.6%±1.2 pp2,326±360	8.8%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.2%	21/50
↳ Finance & Insurance	5.3%±1.0 pp1,617±299	6.7%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.4%	24/50
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	2.3%±0.7 pp709±224	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.2%	17/50
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	13.7%±1.9 pp4,204±578	18.2%±0.4 pp—	▼ -4.5%	29/50
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	9.6%±1.5 pp2,953±465	13.4%±0.3 pp—	▼ -3.8%	25/50
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.1%±0.3 pp20±86	0.1%±0.0 pp—	▼ -0.1%	32/50
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	4.0%±1.2 pp1,231±360	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▼ -0.6%	32/50
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	24.3%±2.0 pp7,442±616	24.2%±0.4 pp—	▲ +0.2%	20/50
↳ Educational Services	11.7%±1.6 pp3,571±483	10.5%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.2%	12/50
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	12.6%±1.6 pp3,872±491	13.7%±0.3 pp—	▼ -1.0%	28/50
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	7.4%±1.3 pp2,264±404	9.1%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.7%	34/50
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	2.8%±0.8 pp855±257	2.2%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.6%	10/50
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	4.6%±1.1 pp1,409±328	6.9%±0.2 pp—	▼ -2.3%	42/50
Other Services	5.4%±1.2 pp1,659±356	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.8%	16/50
Public Administration	9.9%±1.4 pp3,027±415	4.0%±0.2 pp—	▲ +5.9%	2/50
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category	Ward 41
Private Company Employee	55.3% ±2.7 pp16,928 ±837
Self-Employed	11.6% ±1.8 pp3,565 ±559
Nonprofit	11.3% ±1.4 pp3,473 ±424
Government	21.5% ±2.1 pp6,587 ±640
Unpaid Family Worker	0.2% ±0.3 pp58 ±92
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Private Company Employee	55.3%±2.7 pp16,928±837	67.9%±0.4 pp947,845±5,822	▼ -12.6%	48/50
Self-Employed	11.6%±1.8 pp3,565±559	8.3%±0.2 pp115,690±2,989	▲ +3.4%	3/50
Nonprofit	11.3%±1.4 pp3,473±424	12.1%±0.3 pp169,124±4,035	▼ -0.8%	26/50
Government	21.5%±2.1 pp6,587±640	12.9%±0.3 pp179,945±4,021	▲ +8.6%	5/50
Unpaid Family Worker	0.2%±0.3 pp58±92	0.2%±0.0 pp2,312±408	0%	17/50
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category	Ward 41
Full-Time, Year-Round	68.4% ±1.6 pp22,319 ±528
Part-Time or Part-Year	31.6% ±2.5 pp10,303 ±823
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round	68.4%±1.6 pp22,319±528	67.0%±0.3 pp1,025,726±3,875	▲ +1.4%	16/50
Part-Time or Part-Year	31.6%±2.5 pp10,303±823	33.0%±0.3 pp504,210±4,897	▼ -1.4%	35/50
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category	Ward 41
Average FT Earnings	$99,027±$5,761
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$35,941±$2,597
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$51,130±$2,620
Median FT Earnings	$78,653±$4,092
75th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000
90th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Average FT Earnings	$99,027±$5,761	$96,214±$968	▲ +$2,812	14/50
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$35,941±$2,597	$29,008±$387	▲ +$6,933	10/50
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$51,130±$2,620	$43,011±$345	▲ +$8,118	13/50
Median FT Earnings	$78,653±$4,092	$69,663±$530	▲ +$8,990	13/50
75th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000	Over $100,000	—	1/50
90th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000	Over $100,000	—	1/50
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$84,158 ±2,250	$95,191 ±3,420	$99,027 ±5,761	▲ +$14,869▲ +$3,835▲ +$11,033
Chicago citywide	$83,170 ±714	$91,467 ±682	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$13,044▲ +$4,747▲ +$8,297
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$63,513 ±1,698	$77,581 ±2,787	$99,027 ±5,761	▲ +$35,514▲ +$21,446▲ +$14,068
Chicago citywide	$62,767 ±539	$74,546 ±556	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$33,447▲ +$21,669▲ +$11,778
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$29,282 ±1,757	$32,080 ±2,075	$35,941 ±2,597	▲ +$6,660▲ +$3,861▲ +$2,799
Chicago citywide	$24,209 ±243	$26,113 ±152	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$4,799▲ +$2,895▲ +$1,904
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$22,098 ±1,326	$26,146 ±1,692	$35,941 ±2,597	▲ +$13,843▲ +$9,796▲ +$4,047
Chicago citywide	$18,270 ±183	$21,282 ±124	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$10,738▲ +$7,726▲ +$3,012
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$45,357 ±2,058	$49,887 ±2,430	$51,130 ±2,620	▲ +$5,772▲ +$1,243▲ +$4,529
Chicago citywide	$37,393 ±278	$39,415 ±229	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$5,618▲ +$3,597▲ +$2,021
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$34,230 ±1,553	$40,658 ±1,981	$51,130 ±2,620	▲ +$16,899▲ +$10,472▲ +$6,427
Chicago citywide	$28,220 ±210	$32,123 ±187	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$14,791▲ +$10,888▲ +$3,903
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$70,040 ±3,228	$77,893 ±2,793	$78,653 ±4,092	▲ +$8,612▲ +$760▲ +$7,852
Chicago citywide	$60,575 ±496	$64,628 ±327	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,034▲ +$4,054
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$52,858 ±2,436	$63,483 ±2,276	$78,653 ±4,092	▲ +$25,794▲ +$15,170▲ +$10,624
Chicago citywide	$45,715 ±374	$52,672 ±266	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$23,948▲ +$16,991▲ +$6,957
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$113,200 ±3,353	$118,282 ±3,068	—	——▲ +$5,083
Chicago citywide	$98,274 ±615	$108,202 ±616	—	——▲ +$9,928
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$85,430 ±2,530	$96,400 ±2,500	—	——▲ +$10,971
Chicago citywide	$74,166 ±464	$88,185 ±502	—	——▲ +$14,019
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	—	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	—	—	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category	Ward 41
Average PT Earnings	$35,933±$4,114
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$2,428±$734
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$8,858±$1,896
Median PT Earnings	$21,592±$2,284
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$44,134±$6,817
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$87,385±$11,772
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Average PT Earnings	$35,933±$4,114	$33,575±$750	▲ +$2,358	14/50
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$2,428±$734	$2,183±$87	▲ +$245	20/50
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$8,858±$1,896	$7,222±$206	▲ +$1,637	16/50
Median PT Earnings	$21,592±$2,284	$19,180±$393	▲ +$2,412	13/50
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$44,134±$6,817	$38,498±$681	▲ +$5,636	13/50
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$87,385±$11,772	$73,776±$1,391	▲ +$13,609	12/50
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$31,718 ±2,186	$41,022 ±4,810	$35,933 ±4,114	▲ +$4,215▼ −$5,088▲ +$9,304
Chicago citywide	$27,076 ±473	$31,236 ±676	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$6,500▲ +$2,340▲ +$4,160
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$23,937 ±1,650	$33,433 ±3,920	$35,933 ±4,114	▲ +$11,996▲ +$2,501▲ +$9,496
Chicago citywide	$20,433 ±357	$25,457 ±551	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$13,142▲ +$8,118▲ +$5,024
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$3,232 ±650	$3,507 ±656	$2,428 ±734	▼ −$804▼ −$1,079▲ +$276
Chicago citywide	$2,230 ±48	$2,283 ±59	$2,183 ±87	▼ −$47▼ −$100▲ +$53
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$2,439 ±490	$2,858 ±534	$2,428 ±734	▼ −$11▼ −$430▲ +$420
Chicago citywide	$1,683 ±36	$1,861 ±48	$2,183 ±87	▲ +$500▲ +$322▲ +$178
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$9,237 ±1,413	$9,097 ±1,280	$8,858 ±1,896	▼ −$378▼ −$239▼ −$140
Chicago citywide	$6,390 ±123	$6,841 ±156	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$832▲ +$381▲ +$451
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$6,971 ±1,066	$7,414 ±1,043	$8,858 ±1,896	▲ +$1,887▲ +$1,444▲ +$443
Chicago citywide	$4,822 ±93	$5,575 ±127	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$2,399▲ +$1,646▲ +$753
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$21,638 ±2,171	$23,683 ±2,495	$21,592 ±2,284	▼ −$46▼ −$2,091▲ +$2,046
Chicago citywide	$15,461 ±166	$17,025 ±275	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$3,719▲ +$2,155▲ +$1,563
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$16,330 ±1,639	$19,302 ±2,034	$21,592 ±2,284	▲ +$5,262▲ +$2,290▲ +$2,972
Chicago citywide	$11,668 ±125	$13,875 ±224	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$7,512▲ +$5,305▲ +$2,207
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$42,997 ±5,493	$49,631 ±4,844	$44,134 ±6,817	▲ +$1,137▼ −$5,497▲ +$6,634
Chicago citywide	$30,795 ±619	$34,779 ±505	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$7,703▲ +$3,719▲ +$3,984
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$32,449 ±4,145	$40,449 ±3,948	$44,134 ±6,817	▲ +$11,684▲ +$3,684▲ +$8,000
Chicago citywide	$23,241 ±468	$28,345 ±412	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$15,257▲ +$10,153▲ +$5,104
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$75,811 ±8,017	$97,076 ±9,538	$87,385 ±11,772	▲ +$11,574▼ −$9,691▲ +$21,265
Chicago citywide	$61,207 ±1,249	$68,040 ±1,298	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$12,570▲ +$5,737▲ +$6,833
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$57,213 ±6,050	$79,117 ±7,774	$87,385 ±11,772	▲ +$30,172▲ +$8,268▲ +$21,904
Chicago citywide	$46,192 ±942	$55,452 ±1,058	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$27,585▲ +$18,324▲ +$9,261

Earnings of All Workers

Category	Ward 41
Average Earnings	$79,001±$3,871
10th Percentile Earnings	$11,043±$1,638
25th Percentile Earnings	$31,210±$3,531
Median Earnings	$61,727±$3,139
75th Percentile Earnings	Over $100,000
90th Percentile Earnings	Over $100,000
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Average Earnings	$79,001±$3,871	$75,571±$768	▲ +$3,430	12/50
10th Percentile Earnings	$11,043±$1,638	$8,529±$272	▲ +$2,514	14/50
25th Percentile Earnings	$31,210±$3,531	$25,183±$358	▲ +$6,027	11/50
Median Earnings	$61,727±$3,139	$51,367±$471	▲ +$10,360	13/50
75th Percentile Earnings	Over $100,000	$93,324±$598	▲ +$6,676+	1/50
90th Percentile Earnings	Over $100,000	Over $100,000	—	1/50
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$67,718 ±1,653	$79,043 ±2,872	$79,001 ±3,871	▲ +$11,283▼ −$43▲ +$11,326
Chicago citywide	$62,453 ±534	$71,626 ±551	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$13,118▲ +$3,945▲ +$9,173
Average Earnings (nominal dollars)	$51,105 ±1,248	$64,421 ±2,340	$79,001 ±3,871	▲ +$27,895▲ +$14,580▲ +$13,315
Chicago citywide	$47,133 ±403	$58,375 ±449	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$28,438▲ +$17,196▲ +$11,243
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$11,804 ±1,684	$12,334 ±1,543	$11,043 ±1,638	▼ −$761▼ −$1,291▲ +$530
Chicago citywide	$6,858 ±139	$8,358 ±164	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$1,671▲ +$171▲ +$1,500
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$8,908 ±1,271	$10,052 ±1,258	$11,043 ±1,638	▲ +$2,135▲ +$991▲ +$1,144
Chicago citywide	$5,176 ±105	$6,812 ±134	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$3,354▲ +$1,717▲ +$1,636
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$28,060 ±1,087	$32,242 ±2,006	$31,210 ±3,531	▲ +$3,150▼ −$1,032▲ +$4,183
Chicago citywide	$19,598 ±241	$23,173 ±290	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$5,585▲ +$2,010▲ +$3,576
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$21,176 ±821	$26,277 ±1,635	$31,210 ±3,531	▲ +$10,034▲ +$4,933▲ +$5,101
Chicago citywide	$14,790 ±182	$18,886 ±236	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$10,393▲ +$6,297▲ +$4,096
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$54,566 ±2,122	$63,764 ±2,169	$61,727 ±3,139	▲ +$7,161▼ −$2,037▲ +$9,198
Chicago citywide	$42,365 ±293	$47,195 ±370	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$9,002▲ +$4,172▲ +$4,830
Median Earnings (nominal dollars)	$41,180 ±1,602	$51,968 ±1,768	$61,727 ±3,139	▲ +$20,547▲ +$9,759▲ +$10,788
Chicago citywide	$31,972 ±221	$38,464 ±302	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$19,395▲ +$12,903▲ +$6,492
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$97,007 ±3,803	$105,829 ±3,141	—	——▲ +$8,822
Chicago citywide	$78,784 ±555	$87,853 ±597	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$14,540▲ +$5,471▲ +$9,069
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$73,209 ±2,870	$86,251 ±2,560	—	——▲ +$13,041
Chicago citywide	$59,457 ±418	$71,600 ±486	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$33,867▲ +$21,723▲ +$12,144
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$132,363 ±1,595	—	—	———
Chicago citywide	$128,659 ±682	—	—	———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$99,892 ±1,203	—	—	———
Chicago citywide	$97,097 ±515	—	—	———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 41

Category	Ward 41
Household income at age 35	$76,532 ±$1,333
Household income percentile rank	61.0 ±0.62 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	33.7% ±1.03 pp
Individual income at age 35	$50,336 ±$771
Fraction married	51.4% ±1.09 pp
Employment rate	81.9% ±0.83 pp
Incarceration rate	0.27% ±0.12 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 41. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 41 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$76,532 ±$1,333	$43,090 ±$102	+$33,442
Household income percentile rank	61.0 ±0.62 pp	40.9 ±0.06 pp	+20.2 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	33.7% ±1.03 pp	11.4% ±0.08 pp	+22.3 pp
Individual income at age 35	$50,336 ±$771	$33,544 ±$80	+$16,792
Fraction married	51.4% ±1.09 pp	26.4% ±0.11 pp	+25.0 pp
Employment rate	81.9% ±0.83 pp	74.4% ±0.11 pp	+7.5 pp
Incarceration rate	0.27% ±0.12 pp	2.87% ±0.05 pp	−2.6 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 41. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 41 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 41 in Lower-Income Families

Category	Ward 41
Household income at age 35	$55,306 ±$2,200
Household income percentile rank	49.5 ±1.30 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	21.0% ±1.91 pp
Individual income at age 35	$38,829 ±$1,490
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 41 with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 41 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$55,306 ±$2,200	$34,711 ±$124	+$20,594
Household income percentile rank	49.5 ±1.30 pp	35.3 ±0.09 pp	+14.2 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	21.0% ±1.91 pp	6.31% ±0.09 pp	+14.7 pp
Individual income at age 35	$38,829 ±$1,490	$28,716 ±$106	+$10,113
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 41 with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 41 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Ward 41

Category	Ward 41
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	83.3% ±0.82 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	22.9% ±0.93 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 41. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 41 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	83.3% ±0.82 pp	78.1% ±0.11 pp	+5.1 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	22.9% ±0.93 pp	22.9% ±0.11 pp	+0.0 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 41. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 41 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Ward 41

Category	Ward 41
All jobs located in ward 41	63,545
Ward 41 jobs held by Ward 41 residents	2.7%
Ward 41 jobs held by non-Ward 41 residents	97.3%
Employed residents working in Ward 41	5.9%
Employed residents working outside Ward 41	94.1%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 41	Chicago ward median	Difference	Rank
All jobs located in ward 41	63,545	11,093	▲ +52,452	4/50
Ward 41 jobs held by Ward 41 residents	2.7%	6.3%	▼ −3.6 pp	46/50
Ward 41 jobs held by non-Ward 41 residents	97.3%	93.7%	▲ +3.6 pp	5/50
Employed residents working in Ward 41	5.9%	3.2%	▲ +2.8 pp	8/50
Employed residents working outside Ward 41	94.1%	96.8%	▼ −2.8 pp	43/50
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in ward 41	65,593	59,585	63,545	▼ −2,048▲ +3,960▼ −6,008
Chicago citywide	10,920	11,554	11,093	▲ +174▼ −460▲ +634
Ward 41 jobs held by Ward 41 residents	3.0%1,893	3.0%1,695	2.7%1,613	▼ −0.4 pp▼ −280▼ −0.3 pp▼ −82– 0.0 pp▼ −198
Chicago citywide	6.4%696	6.4%725	6.3%701	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5▼ −0.1 pp▼ −24– 0.0 pp▲ +29
Ward 41 jobs held by non-Ward 41 residents	97.0%60,542	97.0%54,756	97.3%58,538	▲ +0.4 pp▼ −2,004▲ +0.3 pp▲ +3,782– 0.0 pp▼ −5,786
Chicago citywide	93.6%9,244	93.6%9,497	93.7%9,122	▲ +0.1 pp▼ −122▲ +0.1 pp▼ −375– 0.0 pp▲ +253
Employed residents working in Ward 41	7.3%1,893	6.4%1,695	5.9%1,613	▼ −1.4 pp▼ −280▼ −0.4 pp▼ −82▼ −1.0 pp▼ −198
Chicago citywide	3.3%696	3.0%725	3.2%701	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5▲ +0.1 pp▼ −24▼ −0.2 pp▲ +29
Employed residents working outside Ward 41	92.7%23,888	93.6%24,989	94.1%25,677	▲ +1.4 pp▲ +1,789▲ +0.4 pp▲ +688▲ +1.0 pp▲ +1,101
Chicago citywide	96.7%19,233	97.0%20,782	96.8%20,998	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,765▼ −0.1 pp▲ +216▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,549

Industry of Jobs in Ward 41

Category	Ward 41
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%1
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0
Construction	4.1%2,593
Manufacturing	1.9%1,217
Wholesale Trade	3.4%2,157
Retail Trade	1.7%1,063
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	49.2%31,251
↳ Utilities	0.0%0
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	49.2%31,251
Information	3.2%2,039
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	4.8%3,030
↳ Finance & Insurance	3.2%2,042
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.6%988
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	12.0%7,637
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	4.8%3,055
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	1.5%931
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	5.7%3,651
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	9.4%6,004
↳ Educational Services	1.1%689
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	8.4%5,315
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	8.9%5,655
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	0.0%27
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	8.9%5,628
Other Services	1.3%840
Public Administration	0.1%58
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%1	0.0%423	0%	21/50
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0	0.0%36	0%	10/50
Construction	4.1%2,593	1.9%27,207	▲ +2.2%	13/50
Manufacturing	1.9%1,217	4.4%64,747	▼ -2.5%	38/50
Wholesale Trade	3.4%2,157	2.8%41,460	▲ +0.6%	18/50
Retail Trade	1.7%1,063	6.6%96,413	▼ -4.9%	50/50
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	49.2%31,251	6.0%87,845	▲ +43.2%	2/50
↳ Utilities	0.0%0	0.3%5,012	▼ -0.3%	20/50
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	49.2%31,251	5.7%82,833	▲ +43.5%	2/50
Information	3.2%2,039	3.5%51,095	▼ -0.3%	7/50
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	4.8%3,030	10.8%157,520	▼ -6.0%	18/50
↳ Finance & Insurance	3.2%2,042	8.6%125,824	▼ -5.4%	11/50
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.6%988	2.2%31,696	▼ -0.6%	30/50
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	12.0%7,637	23.2%339,220	▼ -11.2%	23/50
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	4.8%3,055	14.2%207,444	▼ -9.4%	22/50
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	1.5%931	1.2%16,872	▲ +0.3%	7/50
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	5.7%3,651	7.9%114,904	▼ -2.1%	26/50
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	9.4%6,004	23.0%336,089	▼ -13.5%	41/50
↳ Educational Services	1.1%689	9.2%134,671	▼ -8.1%	45/50
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	8.4%5,315	13.8%201,418	▼ -5.4%	38/50
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	8.9%5,655	10.3%151,055	▼ -1.4%	33/50
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	0.0%27	1.9%27,339	▼ -1.8%	49/50
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	8.9%5,628	8.5%123,716	▲ +0.4%	32/50
Other Services	1.3%840	4.0%59,136	▼ -2.7%	50/50
Public Administration	0.1%58	3.5%51,418	▼ -3.4%	12/50
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%1	– 0.0 pp▲ +1– 0.0 pp▲ +1– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.0%181	0.0%569	0.0%423	– 0.0 pp▲ +242– 0.0 pp▼ −146– 0.0 pp▲ +388
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.0%140	0.0%374	0.0%36	– 0.0 pp▼ −104– 0.0 pp▼ −338– 0.0 pp▲ +234
Construction	1.9%1,228	3.0%1,806	4.1%2,593	▲ +2.2 pp▲ +1,365▲ +1.0 pp▲ +787▲ +1.2 pp▲ +578
Chicago citywide	1.6%20,789	1.8%26,012	1.9%27,207	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,418– 0.0 pp▲ +1,195▲ +0.3 pp▲ +5,223
Manufacturing	1.7%1,146	1.8%1,083	1.9%1,217	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +71▲ +0.1 pp▲ +134▲ +0.1 pp▼ −63
Chicago citywide	4.6%61,066	4.5%63,597	4.4%64,747	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,681▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,150▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,531
Wholesale Trade	3.0%1,951	2.7%1,610	3.4%2,157	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +206▲ +0.7 pp▲ +547▼ −0.3 pp▼ −341
Chicago citywide	3.0%39,431	2.9%41,789	2.8%41,460	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,029▼ −0.1 pp▼ −329▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,358
Retail Trade	2.0%1,319	1.8%1,091	1.7%1,063	▼ −0.3 pp▼ −256▼ −0.2 pp▼ −28▼ −0.2 pp▼ −228
Chicago citywide	7.4%97,262	6.9%97,836	6.6%96,413	▼ −0.8 pp▼ −849▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,423▼ −0.5 pp▲ +574
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	43.3%28,400	42.7%25,426	49.2%31,251	▲ +5.9 pp▲ +2,851▲ +6.5 pp▲ +5,825▼ −0.6 pp▼ −2,974
Chicago citywide	5.4%71,371	5.6%79,303	6.0%87,845	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +16,474▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,542▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,932
Utilities	0.1%80	0.2%90	0.0%0	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −80▼ −0.2 pp▼ −90– 0.0 pp▲ +10
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,383	0.3%4,956	0.3%5,012	– 0.0 pp▲ +629– 0.0 pp▲ +56– 0.0 pp▲ +573
Transportation & Warehousing	43.2%28,320	42.5%25,336	49.2%31,251	▲ +6.0 pp▲ +2,931▲ +6.7 pp▲ +5,915▼ −0.7 pp▼ −2,984
Chicago citywide	5.1%66,988	5.2%74,347	5.7%82,833	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +15,845▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,486▲ +0.1 pp▲ +7,359
Information	4.6%3,008	2.8%1,674	3.2%2,039	▼ −1.4 pp▼ −969▲ +0.4 pp▲ +365▼ −1.8 pp▼ −1,334
Chicago citywide	3.1%40,514	3.4%48,135	3.5%51,095	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +10,581▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,960▲ +0.3 pp▲ +7,621
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	4.3%2,790	4.6%2,740	4.8%3,030	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +240▲ +0.2 pp▲ +290▲ +0.3 pp▼ −50
Chicago citywide	10.5%138,287	10.6%150,163	10.8%157,520	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +19,233▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,357▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,876
Finance & Insurance	2.5%1,620	3.3%1,981	3.2%2,042	▲ +0.7 pp▲ +422▼ −0.1 pp▲ +61▲ +0.9 pp▲ +361
Chicago citywide	8.5%111,307	8.4%119,147	8.6%125,824	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14,517▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,677▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7,840
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.8%1,170	1.3%759	1.6%988	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −182▲ +0.3 pp▲ +229▼ −0.5 pp▼ −411
Chicago citywide	2.1%26,980	2.2%31,016	2.2%31,696	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,716– 0.0 pp▲ +680▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,036
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	13.9%9,132	12.6%7,531	12.0%7,637	▼ −1.9 pp▼ −1,495▼ −0.6 pp▲ +106▼ −1.3 pp▼ −1,601
Chicago citywide	21.2%278,928	22.6%319,744	23.2%339,220	▲ +2.0 pp▲ +60,292▲ +0.6 pp▲ +19,476▲ +1.3 pp▲ +40,816
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	5.4%3,560	5.0%2,962	4.8%3,055	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −505▼ −0.2 pp▲ +93▼ −0.5 pp▼ −598
Chicago citywide	11.8%155,200	12.9%182,462	14.2%207,444	▲ +2.4 pp▲ +52,244▲ +1.3 pp▲ +24,982▲ +1.1 pp▲ +27,262
Management of Companies & Enterprises	1.5%1,009	1.1%670	1.5%931	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −78▲ +0.3 pp▲ +261▼ −0.4 pp▼ −339
Chicago citywide	1.0%13,619	1.2%16,600	1.2%16,872	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,253– 0.0 pp▲ +272▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,981
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	7.0%4,563	6.5%3,899	5.7%3,651	▼ −1.2 pp▼ −912▼ −0.8 pp▼ −248▼ −0.4 pp▼ −664
Chicago citywide	8.4%110,109	8.5%120,682	7.9%114,904	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +4,795▼ −0.7 pp▼ −5,778▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,573
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	15.0%9,815	12.7%7,572	9.4%6,004	▼ −5.5 pp▼ −3,811▼ −3.3 pp▼ −1,568▼ −2.3 pp▼ −2,243
Chicago citywide	23.5%308,633	22.1%313,540	23.0%336,089	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +27,456▲ +0.8 pp▲ +22,549▼ −1.4 pp▲ +4,907
Educational Services	1.2%818	1.5%908	1.1%689	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −129▼ −0.4 pp▼ −219▲ +0.3 pp▲ +90
Chicago citywide	10.1%132,909	9.0%128,169	9.2%134,671	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +1,762▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,502▼ −1.1 pp▼ −4,740
Health Care & Social Assistance	13.7%8,997	11.2%6,664	8.4%5,315	▼ −5.4 pp▼ −3,682▼ −2.8 pp▼ −1,349▼ −2.5 pp▼ −2,333
Chicago citywide	13.4%175,724	13.1%185,371	13.8%201,418	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +25,694▲ +0.7 pp▲ +16,047▼ −0.3 pp▲ +9,647
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	7.7%5,067	12.1%7,199	8.9%5,655	▲ +1.2 pp▲ +588▼ −3.2 pp▼ −1,544▲ +4.4 pp▲ +2,132
Chicago citywide	10.9%143,753	11.5%162,749	10.3%151,055	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,302▼ −1.2 pp▼ −11,694▲ +0.5 pp▲ +18,996
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	0.1%62	0.0%3	0.0%27	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −35– 0.0 pp▲ +24▼ −0.1 pp▼ −59
Chicago citywide	1.7%22,179	2.1%30,178	1.9%27,339	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +5,160▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,839▲ +0.4 pp▲ +7,999
Accommodation & Food Services	7.6%5,005	12.1%7,196	8.9%5,628	▲ +1.2 pp▲ +623▼ −3.2 pp▼ −1,568▲ +4.4 pp▲ +2,191
Chicago citywide	9.3%121,574	9.4%132,571	8.5%123,716	▼ −0.8 pp▲ +2,142▼ −0.9 pp▼ −8,855▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,997
Other Services	1.2%765	1.5%883	1.3%840	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +75▼ −0.2 pp▼ −43▲ +0.3 pp▲ +118
Chicago citywide	4.5%59,098	4.4%61,698	4.0%59,136	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +38▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,562▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,600
Public Administration	1.5%972	1.6%970	0.1%58	▼ −1.4 pp▼ −914▼ −1.5 pp▼ −912▲ +0.1 pp▼ −2
Chicago citywide	4.2%54,814	3.6%51,684	3.5%51,418	▼ −0.7 pp▼ −3,396▼ −0.1 pp▼ −266▼ −0.5 pp▼ −3,130

Earnings of Jobs in Ward 41

Category	Ward 41
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	9.5%6,049
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	22.9%14,549
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	67.6%42,947
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	9.5%6,049	12.7%185,297	▼ -3.1%	48/50
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	22.9%14,549	20.5%299,480	▲ +2.4%	45/50
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	67.6%42,947	66.9%978,851	▲ +0.7%	5/50
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	13.7%8,998	11.7%6,943	9.5%6,049	▼ −4.2 pp▼ −2,949▼ −2.1 pp▼ −894▼ −2.1 pp▼ −2,055
Chicago citywide	21.3%280,137	16.8%238,135	12.7%185,297	▼ −8.7 pp▼ −94,840▼ −4.1 pp▼ −52,838▼ −4.5 pp▼ −42,002
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	31.3%20,500	29.4%17,510	22.9%14,549	▼ −8.4 pp▼ −5,951▼ −6.5 pp▼ −2,961▼ −1.9 pp▼ −2,990
Chicago citywide	30.7%403,250	26.7%378,530	20.5%299,480	▼ −10.2 pp▼ −103,770▼ −6.3 pp▼ −79,050▼ −4.0 pp▼ −24,720
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	55.0%36,095	59.0%35,132	67.6%42,947	▲ +12.6 pp▲ +6,852▲ +8.6 pp▲ +7,815▲ +3.9 pp▼ −963
Chicago citywide	48.0%630,740	56.5%800,154	66.9%978,851	▲ +18.9 pp▲ +348,111▲ +10.4 pp▲ +178,697▲ +8.5 pp▲ +169,414

Jobs in Ward 41 by Firm Age

Category	Ward 41
Firm age: 0–1 years	1.4%909
Firm age: 2–3 years	1.3%818
Firm age: 4–5 years	2.0%1,279
Firm age: 6–10 years	4.2%2,679
Firm age: 11 or more years	91.0%57,800
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years	1.4%909	2.8%37,293	▼ -1.4%	47/50
Firm age: 2–3 years	1.3%818	2.8%37,154	▼ -1.5%	47/50
Firm age: 4–5 years	2.0%1,279	3.2%41,869	▼ -1.2%	42/50
Firm age: 6–10 years	4.2%2,679	7.8%102,354	▼ -3.6%	46/50
Firm age: 11 or more years	91.0%57,800	83.4%1,098,247	▲ +7.6%	3/50
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years	1.8%1,177	0.6%367	1.4%909	▼ −0.4 pp▼ −268▲ +0.8 pp▲ +542▼ −1.2 pp▼ −810
Chicago citywide	2.9%33,224	2.6%33,244	2.8%37,293	– 0.0 pp▲ +4,069▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,049▼ −0.2 pp▲ +20
Firm age: 2–3 years	1.8%1,131	1.9%1,099	1.3%818	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −313▼ −0.6 pp▼ −281▲ +0.1 pp▼ −32
Chicago citywide	4.0%46,935	3.3%42,284	2.8%37,154	▼ −1.2 pp▼ −9,781▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,130▼ −0.7 pp▼ −4,651
Firm age: 4–5 years	0.9%586	1.2%717	2.0%1,279	▲ +1.1 pp▲ +693▲ +0.8 pp▲ +562▲ +0.3 pp▲ +131
Chicago citywide	3.7%42,688	3.6%46,058	3.2%41,869	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −819▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,189▼ −0.1 pp▲ +3,370
Firm age: 6–10 years	4.1%2,633	3.6%2,132	4.2%2,679	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +46▲ +0.6 pp▲ +547▼ −0.4 pp▼ −501
Chicago citywide	8.2%94,955	8.6%109,934	7.8%102,354	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +7,399▼ −0.9 pp▼ −7,580▲ +0.5 pp▲ +14,979
Firm age: 11 or more years	91.4%59,087	92.6%54,277	91.0%57,800	▼ −0.4 pp▼ −1,287▼ −1.6 pp▲ +3,523▲ +1.2 pp▼ −4,810
Chicago citywide	81.3%946,852	81.8%1,043,037	83.4%1,098,247	▲ +2.1 pp▲ +151,395▲ +1.6 pp▲ +55,210▲ +0.5 pp▲ +96,185

Jobs in Ward 41 by Firm Size

Category	Ward 41
Firm size: 0–19 employees	6.0%3,835
Firm size: 20–49 employees	4.1%2,625
Firm size: 50–249 employees	9.4%5,939
Firm size: 250–499 employees	3.7%2,346
Firm size: 500 or more employees	76.8%48,740
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees	6.0%3,835	12.8%168,975	▼ -6.8%	48/50
Firm size: 20–49 employees	4.1%2,625	7.3%96,432	▼ -3.2%	46/50
Firm size: 50–249 employees	9.4%5,939	13.8%181,123	▼ -4.4%	47/50
Firm size: 250–499 employees	3.7%2,346	5.7%74,787	▼ -2.0%	31/50
Firm size: 500 or more employees	76.8%48,740	60.4%795,600	▲ +16.4%	2/50
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees	6.1%3,944	6.3%3,708	6.0%3,835	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −109▼ −0.3 pp▲ +127▲ +0.2 pp▼ −236
Chicago citywide	13.9%162,248	13.3%169,949	12.8%168,975	▼ −1.1 pp▲ +6,727▼ −0.5 pp▼ −974▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,701
Firm size: 20–49 employees	3.9%2,536	4.4%2,586	4.1%2,625	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +89▼ −0.3 pp▲ +39▲ +0.5 pp▲ +50
Chicago citywide	8.4%97,503	8.2%103,945	7.3%96,432	▼ −1.0 pp▼ −1,071▼ −0.8 pp▼ −7,513▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,442
Firm size: 50–249 employees	7.7%4,997	7.8%4,563	9.4%5,939	▲ +1.6 pp▲ +942▲ +1.6 pp▲ +1,376▲ +0.1 pp▼ −434
Chicago citywide	15.7%183,275	14.9%189,930	13.8%181,123	▼ −2.0 pp▼ −2,152▼ −1.1 pp▼ −8,807▼ −0.8 pp▲ +6,655
Firm size: 250–499 employees	2.7%1,740	3.7%2,143	3.7%2,346	▲ +1.0 pp▲ +606– 0.0 pp▲ +203▲ +1.0 pp▲ +403
Chicago citywide	6.3%72,992	5.9%74,603	5.7%74,787	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,795▼ −0.2 pp▲ +184▼ −0.4 pp▲ +1,611
Firm size: 500 or more employees	79.5%51,397	77.8%45,592	76.8%48,740	▼ −2.8 pp▼ −2,657▼ −1.0 pp▲ +3,148▼ −1.7 pp▼ −5,805
Chicago citywide	55.7%648,636	57.8%736,130	60.4%795,600	▲ +4.7 pp▲ +146,964▲ +2.7 pp▲ +59,470▲ +2.1 pp▲ +87,494

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 41
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	15.5% ±1.3 pp15.5%±1.3 pp9,061 ±785
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	77.6% ±4.3 pp12.0%±0.7 pp7,031 ±391
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	22.4% ±3.8 pp3.5%±0.6 pp2,030 ±341
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	15.5%±1.3 pp15.5%±1.3 pp9,061±785	13.5%±0.2 pp13.5%±0.2 pp365,577±5,480	▲ +2.0%▲ +2.0%	21/50
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	77.6%±4.3 pp12.0%±0.7 pp7,031±391	83.0%±0.5 pp11.2%±0.1 pp303,520±1,897	▼ -5.4%▲ +0.9%	36/5025/50
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	22.4%±3.8 pp3.5%±0.6 pp2,030±341	17.0%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.1 pp62,057±2,247	▲ +5.4%▲ +1.2%	15/506/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 41
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	5.3% ±0.7 pp5.3%±0.7 pp3,070 ±428
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	59.8% ±7.2 pp3.2%±0.4 pp1,836 ±222
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	40.2% ±7.1 pp2.1%±0.4 pp1,234 ±218
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	64.7% ±8.7 pp3.4%±0.5 pp1,986 ±266
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	35.3% ±7.0 pp1.9%±0.4 pp1,085 ±214
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	5.3%±0.7 pp5.3%±0.7 pp3,070±428	7.4%±0.1 pp7.4%±0.1 pp201,851±4,036	▼ -2.2%▼ -2.2%	37/50
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	59.8%±7.2 pp3.2%±0.4 pp1,836±222	52.4%±0.7 pp3.9%±0.1 pp105,720±1,511	▲ +7.4%▼ -0.7%	27/5041/50
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	40.2%±7.1 pp2.1%±0.4 pp1,234±218	47.6%±1.2 pp3.5%±0.1 pp96,131±2,437	▼ -7.4%▼ -1.4%	24/5030/50
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	64.7%±8.7 pp3.4%±0.5 pp1,986±266	67.0%±1.0 pp5.0%±0.1 pp135,301±1,945	▼ -2.4%▼ -1.6%	34/5042/50
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	35.3%±7.0 pp1.9%±0.4 pp1,085±214	33.0%±1.2 pp2.5%±0.1 pp66,550±2,459	▲ +2.4%▼ -0.6%	17/5026/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category	Ward 41
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	2.5% ±1.9 pp259 ±199
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	2.5% ±2.5 pp77 ±78
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	2.5%±1.9 pp259±199	5.9%±0.5 pp—	▼ -3.4%	38/50
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	2.5%±2.5 pp77±78	5.4%±0.6 pp—	▼ -2.9%	41/50
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category	Ward 41
Owner-Occupied Households	69.5% ±2.0 pp16,346 ±468
Renter-Occupied Households	30.5% ±2.4 pp7,188 ±573
Owner-Occupied Residents	73.2% ±1.5 pp42,174 ±856
Renter-Occupied Residents	26.8% ±3.0 pp15,408 ±1,746
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Owner-Occupied Households	69.5%±2.0 pp16,346±468	46.0%±0.4 pp534,012±4,939	▲ +23.4%	6/50
Renter-Occupied Households	30.5%±2.4 pp7,188±573	54.0%±0.4 pp626,193±5,183	▼ -23.4%	45/50
Owner-Occupied Residents	73.2%±1.5 pp42,174±856	51.8%±0.5 pp1,377,219±13,574	▲ +21.4%	6/50
Renter-Occupied Residents	26.8%±3.0 pp15,408±1,746	48.2%±0.5 pp1,280,665±13,500	▼ -21.4%	45/50
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category	Ward 41
Median Year Moved In	2010±1.1 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later	3.3% ±1.0 pp767 ±235
Moved in 2020 to 2022	18.4% ±2.3 pp4,321 ±552
Moved in 2010 to 2019	32.6% ±2.8 pp7,680 ±661
Moved in 2000 to 2009	18.6% ±2.2 pp4,365 ±513
Moved in 1990 to 1999	13.4% ±2.0 pp3,159 ±465
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	13.8% ±1.6 pp3,238 ±379
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Moved In	2010±1.1 yr	2015±1.0 yr	▼ −5	40/50
Moved in 2023 or Later	3.3%±1.0 pp767±235	5.9%±0.2 pp68,884±2,742	▼ -2.7%	39/50
Moved in 2020 to 2022	18.4%±2.3 pp4,321±552	24.1%±0.4 pp279,417±5,059	▼ -5.7%	30/50
Moved in 2010 to 2019	32.6%±2.8 pp7,680±661	39.2%±0.5 pp455,125±5,772	▼ -6.6%	49/50
Moved in 2000 to 2009	18.6%±2.2 pp4,365±513	13.8%±0.3 pp160,353±3,324	▲ +4.7%	9/50
Moved in 1990 to 1999	13.4%±2.0 pp3,159±465	8.2%±0.2 pp95,243±2,390	▲ +5.2%	9/50
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	13.8%±1.6 pp3,238±379	8.7%±0.2 pp101,183±2,362	▲ +5.0%	12/50
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 41
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	9.2% ±1.5 pp9.2%±1.5 pp5,288 ±888
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	7.0% ±1.4 pp76.5%±8.9 pp4,047 ±827
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	0.4% ±0.2 pp4.3%±2.2 pp230 ±124
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	1.0% ±0.4 pp11.2%±4.1 pp593 ±241
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	0.7% ±0.4 pp7.9%±3.9 pp418 ±219
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	9.2%±1.5 pp9.2%±1.5 pp5,288±888	14.0%±0.3 pp14.0%±0.3 pp375,475±8,289	▼ -4.8%▼ -4.8%	33/50
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	7.0%±1.4 pp76.5%±8.9 pp4,047±827	9.8%±0.3 pp69.9%±1.0 pp262,365±6,953	▼ -2.7%▲ +6.7%	35/5017/50
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	0.4%±0.2 pp4.3%±2.2 pp230±124	0.8%±0.1 pp5.5%±0.4 pp20,552±1,626	▼ -0.4%▼ -1.1%	28/5026/50
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	1.0%±0.4 pp11.2%±4.1 pp593±241	2.5%±0.1 pp17.6%±0.7 pp65,936±2,918	▼ -1.4%▼ -6.3%	28/5028/50
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	0.7%±0.4 pp7.9%±3.9 pp418±219	1.0%±0.1 pp7.1%±0.8 pp26,622±3,040	▼ -0.3%▲ +0.8%	32/5023/50
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 41
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	4.1% ±1.2 pp4.1%±1.2 pp1,011 ±295
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	0.8% ±0.5 pp20.2%±11.1 pp204 ±127
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.2% ±0.4 pp5.9%±10.0 pp60 ±103
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.0% ±0.2 pp0.0%0
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	3.0% ±1.2 pp73.9%±18.4 pp747 ±286
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	2.7% ±1.6 pp2.7%±1.6 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	0.4% ±0.6 pp0.4%±0.6 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	4.1%±1.2 pp4.1%±1.2 pp1,011±295	9.1%±0.2 pp9.1%±0.2 pp116,849±2,682	▼ -5.0%▼ -5.0%	49/50
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	0.8%±0.5 pp20.2%±11.1 pp204±127	2.5%±0.1 pp27.1%±1.4 pp31,723±1,796	▼ -1.7%▼ -7.0%	47/5034/50
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.2%±0.4 pp5.9%±10.0 pp60±103	0.6%±0.1 pp6.0%±0.7 pp7,037±795	▼ -0.3%▼ -0.1%	39/5020/50
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.0%±0.2 pp0.0%0	0.2%±0.0 pp2.4%±0.5 pp2,831±587	▼ -0.2%▼ -2.4%	39/5039/50
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	3.0%±1.2 pp73.9%±18.4 pp747±286	5.9%±0.3 pp64.4%±2.5 pp75,258±3,387	▼ -2.8%▲ +9.5%	45/5012/50
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	2.7%±1.6 pp2.7%±1.6 pp—	4.8%±0.3 pp4.8%±0.3 pp—	▼ -2.1%▼ -2.1%	45/50
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	0.4%±0.6 pp0.4%±0.6 pp—	1.3%±0.1 pp1.3%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.9%▼ -0.9%	43/50
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category	Ward 41
Median Year Built	1959±1 yr
Pre-1940	18.1% ±1.9 pp4,452 ±479
1940-2009	80.4% ±4.0 pp19,741 ±974
2010+	1.5% ±0.6 pp367 ±152
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Built	1959±1 yr	1953±1 yr	▲ +6 yrs	12/50
Pre-1940	18.1%±1.9 pp4,452±479	38.8%±0.4 pp495,715±4,678	▼ -20.7%	44/50
1940-2009	80.4%±4.0 pp19,741±974	54.9%±0.6 pp700,698±7,435	▲ +25.5%	4/50
2010+	1.5%±0.6 pp367±152	6.3%±0.2 pp80,641±2,725	▼ -4.8%	42/50
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category	Ward 41
Population Density	3,409 /sq mi±148/sq mi
Single-Family Homes	55.8% ±1.4 pp13,712 ±354
Buildings With 2–4 Units	11.0% ±2.1 pp2,695 ±528
Buildings With 5–19 Units	16.4% ±2.2 pp4,039 ±530
Buildings With 20 or More Units	16.5% ±2.0 pp4,057 ±493
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Population Density	3,409 /sq mi±148/sq mi	11,721 /sq mi±26/sq mi	▼ −8,312 /sq mi	49/50
Single-Family Homes	55.8%±1.4 pp13,712±354	29.2%±0.3 pp372,679±3,989	▲ +26.6%	8/50
Buildings With 2–4 Units	11.0%±2.1 pp2,695±528	27.4%±0.4 pp349,976±4,957	▼ -16.4%	41/50
Buildings With 5–19 Units	16.4%±2.2 pp4,039±530	16.2%±0.3 pp206,420±4,124	▲ +0.3%	21/50
Buildings With 20 or More Units	16.5%±2.0 pp4,057±493	27.0%±0.3 pp344,543±4,438	▼ -10.5%	19/50
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category	Ward 41
Studio	3.4% ±1.0 pp832 ±253
1 Bedroom	12.8% ±2.0 pp3,150 ±501
2 Bedrooms	32.4% ±2.3 pp7,948 ±573
3 Bedrooms	33.7% ±2.5 pp8,287 ±620
4 Bedrooms	13.5% ±1.5 pp3,327 ±373
5 or More Bedrooms	4.1% ±1.1 pp1,017 ±264
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Studio	3.4%±1.0 pp832±253	7.5%±0.3 pp95,749±3,205	▼ -4.1%	30/50
1 Bedroom	12.8%±2.0 pp3,150±501	20.1%±0.4 pp257,271±4,939	▼ -7.3%	31/50
2 Bedrooms	32.4%±2.3 pp7,948±573	33.1%±0.3 pp422,866±4,221	▼ -0.8%	28/50
3 Bedrooms	33.7%±2.5 pp8,287±620	26.1%±0.3 pp333,682±4,061	▲ +7.6%	14/50
4 Bedrooms	13.5%±1.5 pp3,327±373	9.0%±0.2 pp115,453±2,426	▲ +4.5%	11/50
5 or More Bedrooms	4.1%±1.1 pp1,017±264	4.1%±0.2 pp52,033±2,072	▲ +0.1%	28/50
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 41
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	2.8% ±1.1 pp2.8%±1.1 pp663 ±252
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	2.1% ±0.8 pp74.9%±9.7 pp497 ±199
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	0.7% ±0.7 pp25.1%±21.3 pp166 ±155
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	2.8%±1.1 pp2.8%±1.1 pp663±252	3.4%±0.2 pp3.4%±0.2 pp39,979±1,996	▼ -0.6%▼ -0.6%	32/50
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	2.1%±0.8 pp74.9%±9.7 pp497±199	2.0%±0.1 pp58.2%±2.3 pp23,276±1,493	▲ +0.1%▲ +16.7%	23/509/50
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	0.7%±0.7 pp25.1%±21.3 pp166±155	1.4%±0.1 pp41.8%±2.6 pp16,703±1,328	▼ -0.7%▼ -16.7%	42/5042/50
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category	Ward 41
Natural Gas Heat	88.0% ±2.1 pp20,716 ±497
Electric Heat	9.2% ±1.6 pp2,170 ±367
Other Heating Source	2.7% ±1.1 pp643 ±256
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Natural Gas Heat	88.0%±2.1 pp20,716±497	77.5%±0.3 pp899,660±3,501	▲ +10.5%	16/50
Electric Heat	9.2%±1.6 pp2,170±367	18.0%±0.3 pp208,937±3,864	▼ -8.8%	30/50
Other Heating Source	2.7%±1.1 pp643±256	4.4%±0.2 pp51,603±2,173	▼ -1.7%	41/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show

Category	Ward 41
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	47.3% ±2.9 pp11,135 ±682
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	24.3% ±2.6 pp5,716 ±606
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	28.4% ±2.6 pp6,678 ±608
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	14.0% ±2.1 pp3,301 ±493
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	30.7% ±6.2 pp2,096 ±421
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	28.1% ±6.1 pp1,916 ±415
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	41.2% ±4.9 pp2,810 ±333
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	23.8% ±4.7 pp1,626 ±322
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	54.3% ±3.3 pp8,710 ±529
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	22.6% ±2.5 pp3,626 ±403
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	23.1% ±2.8 pp3,712 ±455
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	10.1% ±2.1 pp1,615 ±336
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	45.9% ±4.5 pp4,703 ±462
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	28.3% ±3.2 pp2,899 ±327
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	25.8% ±3.6 pp2,639 ±369
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	11.2% ±2.8 pp1,144 ±290
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage and a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	69.0% ±4.2 pp4,007 ±242
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	12.5% ±3.8 pp727 ±220
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	18.5% ±4.5 pp1,072 ±263
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	8.1% ±2.9 pp471 ±169
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage and with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	47.3%±2.9 pp11,135±682	24.9%±0.4 pp289,047±4,524	▲ +22.4%	7/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	24.3%±2.6 pp5,716±606	23.8%±0.4 pp276,514±4,291	▲ +0.5%	15/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	28.4%±2.6 pp6,678±608	45.6%±0.5 pp529,378±5,291	▼ -17.2%	47/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	14.0%±2.1 pp3,301±493	24.0%±0.4 pp278,684±4,167	▼ -10.0%	45/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	30.7%±6.2 pp2,096±421	26.4%±0.5 pp155,936±3,134	▲ +4.3%	14/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	28.1%±6.1 pp1,916±415	25.3%±0.5 pp149,215±2,939	▲ +2.8%	10/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	41.2%±4.9 pp2,810±333	48.3%±0.7 pp285,567±4,222	▼ -7.2%	39/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	23.8%±4.7 pp1,626±322	25.5%±0.6 pp150,346±3,554	▼ -1.6%	30/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	54.3%±3.3 pp8,710±529	51.6%±0.6 pp272,277±2,904	▲ +2.7%	14/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	22.6%±2.5 pp3,626±403	19.6%±0.5 pp103,661±2,759	▲ +3.0%	8/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	23.1%±2.8 pp3,712±455	28.8%±0.6 pp151,994±3,034	▼ -5.7%	43/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	10.1%±2.1 pp1,615±336	13.8%±0.4 pp73,053±2,233	▼ -3.8%	47/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	45.9%±4.5 pp4,703±462	42.8%±0.7 pp146,216±2,365	▲ +3.1%	10/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	28.3%±3.2 pp2,899±327	23.9%±0.7 pp81,659±2,408	▲ +4.4%	8/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	25.8%±3.6 pp2,639±369	33.3%±0.8 pp113,882±2,596	▼ -7.6%	45/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	11.2%±2.8 pp1,144±290	15.4%±0.5 pp52,632±1,873	▼ -4.2%	44/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage and a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	69.0%±4.2 pp4,007±242	67.7%±0.9 pp126,058±1,613	▲ +1.3%	20/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	12.5%±3.8 pp727±220	11.8%±0.7 pp22,000±1,275	▲ +0.7%	25/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	18.5%±4.5 pp1,072±263	20.5%±0.8 pp38,106±1,492	▼ -2.0%	32/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	8.1%±2.9 pp471±169	11.0%±0.6 pp20,421±1,202	▼ -2.9%	44/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage and with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category	Ward 41
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$686±$61
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,066±$43
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$1,592±$75
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$2,456±$96
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	Over $3,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$686±$61	$594±$11	▲ +$92	20/50
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,066±$43	$1,011±$8	▲ +$55	19/50
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$1,592±$75	$1,560±$10	▲ +$32	18/50
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$2,456±$96	$2,329±$13	▲ +$126	14/50
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	Over $3,000	Over $3,000	—	1/50
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$698 ±28	$700 ±40	$686 ±61	▼ −$12▼ −$14▲ +$2
Chicago citywide	$609 ±7	$606 ±7	$594 ±11	▼ −$15▼ −$12▼ −$2
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$527 ±21	$571 ±32	$686 ±61	▲ +$159▲ +$116▲ +$44
Chicago citywide	$459 ±6	$494 ±6	$594 ±11	▲ +$135▲ +$100▲ +$35
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,019 ±35	$1,033 ±36	$1,066 ±43	▲ +$47▲ +$33▲ +$13
Chicago citywide	$992 ±5	$1,001 ±5	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$19▲ +$10▲ +$9
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$769 ±27	$842 ±29	$1,066 ±43	▲ +$297▲ +$224▲ +$72
Chicago citywide	$748 ±3	$816 ±4	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$262▲ +$195▲ +$67
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,610 ±51	$1,578 ±47	$1,592 ±75	▼ −$17▲ +$14▼ −$32
Chicago citywide	$1,493 ±8	$1,523 ±6	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$67▲ +$37▲ +$29
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,215 ±39	$1,286 ±38	$1,592 ±75	▲ +$378▲ +$306▲ +$71
Chicago citywide	$1,127 ±6	$1,241 ±5	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$433▲ +$319▲ +$114
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,547 ±73	$2,451 ±86	$2,456 ±96	▼ −$92▲ +$5▼ −$96
Chicago citywide	$2,333 ±12	$2,326 ±10	$2,329 ±13	▼ −$4▲ +$3▼ −$7
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,922 ±55	$1,998 ±70	$2,456 ±96	▲ +$533▲ +$458▲ +$75
Chicago citywide	$1,761 ±9	$1,896 ±8	$2,329 ±13	▲ +$569▲ +$434▲ +$135
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$3,337 ±84	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	$3,316 ±20	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$2,720 ±68	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	$2,703 ±16	—	———

Rent

Rent measure

Category	Ward 41
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$1,798±$235
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$990±$57
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,173±$56
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$1,504±$83
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,935±$82
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$2,436±$182
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$1,798±$235	$1,613±$12	▲ +$185	9/50
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$990±$57	$696±$20	▲ +$294	8/50
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,173±$56	$1,043±$8	▲ +$130	13/50
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$1,504±$83	$1,440±$10	▲ +$64	12/50
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,935±$82	$2,021±$21	▼ −$86	15/50
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$2,436±$182	$2,738±$29	▼ −$302	17/50
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41
Average Rent	$1,684±$239
10th Percentile Rent	$950±$53
25th Percentile Rent	$1,115±$46
Median Rent	$1,411±$77
75th Percentile Rent	$1,833±$78
90th Percentile Rent	$2,325±$211
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent	$1,684±$239	$1,452±$11	▲ +$232	8/50
10th Percentile Rent	$950±$53	$564±$21	▲ +$385	8/50
25th Percentile Rent	$1,115±$46	$913±$7	▲ +$202	9/50
Median Rent	$1,411±$77	$1,262±$12	▲ +$149	12/50
75th Percentile Rent	$1,833±$78	$1,868±$13	▼ −$35	15/50
90th Percentile Rent	$2,325±$211	$2,528±$38	▼ −$203	17/50
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category	Ward 41
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,553±$45
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,317±$89
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,746±$107
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,441±$111
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$3,098±$113
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$3,819±$147
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,553±$45	$2,734±$24	▼ −$180	21/50
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,317±$89	$1,270±$14	▲ +$46	24/50
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,746±$107	$1,697±$14	▲ +$48	24/50
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,441±$111	$2,339±$17	▲ +$102	20/50
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$3,098±$113	$3,269±$31	▼ −$171	25/50
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$3,819±$147	Over $4,000	▼ −$181+	26/50
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,803 ±14	$2,698 ±36	$2,553 ±45	▼ −$249▼ −$145▼ −$104
Chicago citywide	$2,855 ±19	$2,793 ±23	$2,734 ±24	▼ −$121▼ −$60▼ −$61
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$2,115 ±11	$2,199 ±29	$2,553 ±45	▲ +$438▲ +$354▲ +$84
Chicago citywide	$2,154 ±14	$2,277 ±19	$2,734 ±24	▲ +$579▲ +$457▲ +$122
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,450 ±97	$1,480 ±131	$1,317 ±89	▼ −$133▼ −$163▲ +$30
Chicago citywide	$1,403 ±11	$1,356 ±11	$1,270 ±14	▼ −$133▼ −$86▼ −$47
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,094 ±73	$1,206 ±107	$1,317 ±89	▲ +$222▲ +$110▲ +$112
Chicago citywide	$1,059 ±8	$1,105 ±9	$1,270 ±14	▲ +$212▲ +$165▲ +$46
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,936 ±81	$1,950 ±79	$1,746 ±107	▼ −$190▼ −$204▲ +$14
Chicago citywide	$1,874 ±12	$1,800 ±12	$1,697 ±14	▼ −$177▼ −$103▼ −$74
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,461 ±61	$1,589 ±64	$1,746 ±107	▲ +$285▲ +$157▲ +$128
Chicago citywide	$1,414 ±9	$1,467 ±10	$1,697 ±14	▲ +$283▲ +$230▲ +$53
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,621 ±90	$2,609 ±77	$2,441 ±111	▼ −$179▼ −$168▼ −$12
Chicago citywide	$2,526 ±13	$2,422 ±13	$2,339 ±17	▼ −$187▼ −$83▼ −$103
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,978 ±68	$2,126 ±62	$2,441 ±111	▲ +$464▲ +$315▲ +$149
Chicago citywide	$1,906 ±10	$1,974 ±11	$2,339 ±17	▲ +$433▲ +$365▲ +$68
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$3,459 ±132	$3,285 ±90	$3,098 ±113	▼ −$361▼ −$187▼ −$174
Chicago citywide	$3,447 ±25	$3,343 ±25	$3,269 ±31	▼ −$178▼ −$74▼ −$104
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$2,610 ±99	$2,677 ±74	$3,098 ±113	▲ +$488▲ +$421▲ +$67
Chicago citywide	$2,601 ±19	$2,724 ±20	$3,269 ±31	▲ +$668▲ +$544▲ +$123
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$3,959 ±137	$3,819 ±147	—▼ −$140—
Chicago citywide	—	$4,578 ±59	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	—	$3,226 ±112	$3,819 ±147	—▲ +$592—
Chicago citywide	—	$3,731 ±48	—	———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category	Ward 41
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$944±$45
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$462±$36
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$640±$58
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$888±$47
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,093±$44
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,338±$67
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$944±$45	$1,078±$22	▼ −$133	24/50
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$462±$36	$418±$8	▲ +$44	21/50
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$640±$58	$601±$8	▲ +$40	24/50
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$888±$47	$859±$10	▲ +$29	23/50
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,093±$44	$1,197±$18	▼ −$104	25/50
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,338±$67	Over $1,500	▼ −$162+	29/50
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$836 ±21	$903 ±34	$944 ±45	▲ +$108▲ +$41▲ +$67
Chicago citywide	$957 ±15	$1,028 ±10	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$121▲ +$50▲ +$71
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$631 ±16	$736 ±27	$944 ±45	▲ +$313▲ +$208▲ +$105
Chicago citywide	$722 ±11	$838 ±8	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$355▲ +$240▲ +$116
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$461 ±41	$504 ±29	$462 ±36	▲ +$1▼ −$42▲ +$43
Chicago citywide	$429 ±6	$469 ±7	$418 ±8	▼ −$11▼ −$51▲ +$40
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$348 ±31	$411 ±24	$462 ±36	▲ +$114▲ +$52▲ +$63
Chicago citywide	$324 ±5	$382 ±5	$418 ±8	▲ +$95▲ +$36▲ +$59
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$655 ±33	$658 ±36	$640 ±58	▼ −$15▼ −$17▲ +$3
Chicago citywide	$586 ±6	$629 ±6	$601 ±8	▲ +$14▼ −$28▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$494 ±25	$536 ±29	$640 ±58	▲ +$146▲ +$104▲ +$42
Chicago citywide	$442 ±4	$513 ±5	$601 ±8	▲ +$158▲ +$88▲ +$70
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$822 ±26	$879 ±27	$888 ±47	▲ +$67▲ +$9▲ +$58
Chicago citywide	$815 ±9	$860 ±7	$859 ±10	▲ +$44▼ −$1▲ +$45
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$620 ±20	$717 ±22	$888 ±47	▲ +$268▲ +$172▲ +$97
Chicago citywide	$615 ±7	$701 ±6	$859 ±10	▲ +$244▲ +$158▲ +$86
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$1,088 ±46	$1,093 ±44	—▲ +$5—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,206 ±14	$1,197 ±18	—▼ −$9—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$887 ±37	$1,093 ±44	—▲ +$206—
Chicago citywide	—	$983 ±12	$1,197 ±18	—▲ +$214—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$1,350 ±64	$1,338 ±67	—▼ −$11—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,767 ±35	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$1,100 ±52	$1,338 ±67	—▲ +$238—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,440 ±28	—	———

Home Values

Category	Ward 41
Average Home Value	$408,816±$10,991
10th Percentile Home Value	$175,351±$19,072
25th Percentile Home Value	$279,403±$19,709
Median Home Value	$390,050±$12,737
75th Percentile Home Value	$491,625±$12,735
90th Percentile Home Value	$693,158±$25,099
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Average Home Value	$408,816±$10,991	$437,638±$7,358	▼ −$28,822	20/50
10th Percentile Home Value	$175,351±$19,072	$129,150±$3,756	▲ +$46,201	21/50
25th Percentile Home Value	$279,403±$19,709	$217,800±$1,804	▲ +$61,603	19/50
Median Home Value	$390,050±$12,737	$334,100±$2,424	▲ +$55,950	18/50
75th Percentile Home Value	$491,625±$12,735	$497,700±$3,730	▼ −$6,075	21/50
90th Percentile Home Value	$693,158±$25,099	$809,159±$15,691	▼ −$116,002	23/50
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$385,039 ±12,621	$396,099 ±6,382	$408,816 ±10,991	▲ +$23,777▲ +$12,717▲ +$11,060
Chicago citywide	$386,614 ±5,106	$424,380 ±4,754	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$51,024▲ +$13,258▲ +$37,766
Average Home Value (nominal dollars)	$290,583 ±9,525	$322,821 ±5,201	$408,816 ±10,991	▲ +$118,233▲ +$85,995▲ +$32,238
Chicago citywide	$291,771 ±3,853	$345,871 ±3,874	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$145,867▲ +$91,768▲ +$54,099
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$147,666 ±16,257	$185,342 ±18,503	$175,351 ±19,072	▲ +$27,685▼ −$9,991▲ +$37,676
Chicago citywide	$115,330 ±1,421	$124,313 ±1,339	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$13,821▲ +$4,838▲ +$8,983
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$111,441 ±12,269	$151,054 ±15,080	$175,351 ±19,072	▲ +$63,910▲ +$24,297▲ +$39,613
Chicago citywide	$87,037 ±1,072	$101,315 ±1,091	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$42,113▲ +$27,835▲ +$14,278
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$258,683 ±11,999	$303,194 ±15,483	$279,403 ±19,709	▲ +$20,720▼ −$23,791▲ +$44,511
Chicago citywide	$190,543 ±2,400	$199,018 ±1,255	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$27,257▲ +$18,782▲ +$8,475
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$195,224 ±9,055	$247,104 ±12,619	$279,403 ±19,709	▲ +$84,179▲ +$32,300▲ +$51,880
Chicago citywide	$143,800 ±1,811	$162,200 ±1,023	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$74,000▲ +$55,600▲ +$18,400
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$369,657 ±9,163	$399,757 ±8,577	$390,050 ±12,737	▲ +$20,393▼ −$9,706▲ +$30,100
Chicago citywide	$299,066 ±2,120	$316,564 ±2,118	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$35,034▲ +$17,536▲ +$17,498
Median Home Value (nominal dollars)	$278,974 ±6,915	$325,803 ±6,990	$390,050 ±12,737	▲ +$111,076▲ +$64,248▲ +$46,828
Chicago citywide	$225,700 ±1,600	$258,000 ±1,726	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$108,400▲ +$76,100▲ +$32,300
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$494,375 ±11,054	$496,960 ±13,324	$491,625 ±12,735	▼ −$2,750▼ −$5,335▲ +$2,585
Chicago citywide	$466,951 ±3,138	$490,797 ±3,892	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$30,749▲ +$6,903▲ +$23,846
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$373,097 ±8,342	$405,023 ±10,859	$491,625 ±12,735	▲ +$118,529▲ +$86,602▲ +$31,926
Chicago citywide	$352,400 ±2,368	$400,000 ±3,172	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$145,300▲ +$97,700▲ +$47,600
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$635,640 ±19,831	$619,669 ±33,419	$693,158 ±25,099	▲ +$57,518▲ +$73,489▼ −$15,971
Chicago citywide	$739,174 ±12,945	$835,769 ±9,047	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$69,986▼ −$26,610▲ +$96,595
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$479,707 ±14,966	$505,031 ±27,236	$693,158 ±25,099	▲ +$213,450▲ +$188,126▲ +$25,324
Chicago citywide	$557,842 ±9,770	$681,153 ±7,373	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$251,317▲ +$128,006▲ +$123,311

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 41
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	0.5%0.5%123
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.4%79.7%98
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.1%20.3%25
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.0%0.0%0
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.0%0.0%0
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	0.5%0.5%123	8.3%8.3%106,578	▼ -7.8%▼ -7.8%	50/50
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.4%79.7%98	4.8%57.2%60,910	▼ -4.4%▲ +22.5%	49/5016/50
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.1%20.3%25	1.1%13.8%14,721	▼ -1.0%▲ +6.5%	37/5012/50
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.0%0.0%0	2.1%25.7%27,383	▼ -2.1%▼ -25.7%	44/5044/50
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.0%0.0%0	0.3%3.3%3,564	▼ -0.3%▼ -3.3%	38/5038/50
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units	0.4%93	0.5%115	0.5%123	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +30– 0.0 pp▲ +8▲ +0.1 pp▲ +22
Chicago citywide	8.8%104,550	8.5%103,479	8.3%106,578	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,028▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,099▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,071
Housing Choice Vouchers	0.3%71	0.3%81	0.4%98	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +27▲ +0.1 pp▲ +17– 0.0 pp▲ +10
Chicago citywide	4.3%51,601	4.6%55,987	4.8%60,910	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +9,309▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,923▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,386
Public Housing	0.1%22	0.1%35	0.1%25	– 0.0 pp▲ +3– 0.0 pp▼ −10▲ +0.1 pp▲ +13
Chicago citywide	1.8%21,159	1.3%16,094	1.2%14,721	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −6,438▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,373▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,065
Project-Based Section 8	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	2.2%25,940	2.2%26,951	2.1%27,383	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,443▼ −0.1 pp▲ +432– 0.0 pp▲ +1,011
Other Project-Based Programs	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,850	0.4%4,447	0.3%3,564	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,286▼ −0.1 pp▼ −883▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,403

Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category	Ward 41
Average Household Income	$19,944
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$490
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,362
Below 30% of Area Median Income	80.9%62
With Children	29.9%23
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	47.6%36
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this ward. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this ward. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this ward.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$19,944	$17,032	▲ +$2,912	7/50
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$490	$425	▲ +$65	7/50
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,362	$1,389	▼ -$27	22/50
Below 30% of Area Median Income	80.9%62	83.0%77,427	▼ -2.1 pp	36/50
With Children	29.9%23	31.0%28,919	▼ -1.1 pp	29/50
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	47.6%36	32.0%29,852	▲ +15.6 pp	2/50
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this ward. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this ward. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this ward.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income	$10,538	$13,338	$20,162	▲ +$9,624▲ +$6,824▲ +$2,800
Chicago citywide	$12,156	$13,665	$17,032	▲ +$4,876▲ +$3,367▲ +$1,509
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$259	$323	$494	▲ +$235▲ +$171▲ +$64
Chicago citywide	$310	$340	$425	▲ +$115▲ +$85▲ +$30
Average Monthly Government Spending	$891	$976	$1,359	▲ +$467▲ +$382▲ +$85
Chicago citywide	$916	$1,017	$1,389	▲ +$473▲ +$372▲ +$101
Below 30% of Area Median Income	85.6%—	86.0%—	80.4%—	▼ −5.2 pp—▼ −5.6 pp—▲ +0.4 pp—
Chicago citywide	80.0%—	81.0%—	83.0%—	▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +2.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children	—	—	30.4%—	——————
Chicago citywide	—	—	31.0%—	——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	61.6%—	65.1%—	47.6%—	▼ −14.0 pp—▼ −17.5 pp—▲ +3.5 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category	Ward 41
Total Tree Canopy	20.6%768 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	58.5%2,184 acres
Natural Open Surfaces	20.9%781 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Total Tree Canopy	20.6%768 acres	18.4%25,934 acres	▲ +2.2%	17/50
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	58.5%2,184 acres	60.2%84,955 acres	▼ -1.6%	36/50
Natural Open Surfaces	20.9%781 acres	21.5%30,331 acres	▼ -0.6%	16/50
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category	Ward 41
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	36.7% ±3.9 pp21,312 ±2,258
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	43.1% ±4.0 pp25,035 ±2,351
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	20.2% ±3.4 pp11,759 ±1,995
Homes Without Air Conditioning	1.9%1,088
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	36.7%±3.9 pp21,312±2,258	26.1%±0.5 pp708,175±13,883	▲ +10.6%	6/50
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	43.1%±4.0 pp25,035±2,351	44.1%±0.6 pp1,195,501±15,477	▼ -1.0%	29/50
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	20.2%±3.4 pp11,759±1,995	29.8%±0.5 pp807,550±13,776	▼ -9.5%	45/50
Homes Without Air Conditioning	1.9%1,088	4.2%114,618	▼ -2.4%	46/50
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category	Ward 41
Drove Alone	76.4% ±2.1 pp19,549 ±526
Carpooled	11.7% ±2.3 pp3,001 ±587
Public Transit	9.3% ±1.7 pp2,375 ±426
Walked	1.9% ±0.7 pp479 ±173
Bikes	0.1% ±0.2 pp15 ±62
Other Commute Mode	0.3% ±0.4 pp73 ±90
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Drove Alone	76.4%±2.1 pp19,549±526	56.6%±0.4 pp772,696±5,998	▲ +19.8%	2/50
Carpooled	11.7%±2.3 pp3,001±587	9.3%±0.3 pp126,918±3,980	▲ +2.4%	14/50
Public Transit	9.3%±1.7 pp2,375±426	22.4%±0.4 pp305,691±6,011	▼ -13.1%	50/50
Walked	1.9%±0.7 pp479±173	7.3%±0.3 pp100,269±3,456	▼ -5.5%	41/50
Bikes	0.1%±0.2 pp15±62	1.8%±0.1 pp24,441±1,693	▼ -1.7%	46/50
Other Commute Mode	0.3%±0.4 pp73±90	2.5%±0.1 pp34,356±1,772	▼ -2.2%	50/50
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category	Ward 41
Average Commute Time (minutes)	30 min±0.9 min
Less Than 15 Minutes	15.9% ±2.2 pp4,063 ±571
15–29 Minutes	31.6% ±2.8 pp8,066 ±721
30–44 Minutes	28.8% ±2.7 pp7,345 ±677
45–59 Minutes	12.6% ±1.7 pp3,218 ±434
60 Minutes or More	11.0% ±1.7 pp2,819 ±424
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes)	30 min±0.9 min	33 min±0.2 min	▼ −3 min	38/50
Less Than 15 Minutes	15.9%±2.2 pp4,063±571	13.0%±0.3 pp140,252±3,438	▲ +2.9%	11/50
15–29 Minutes	31.6%±2.8 pp8,066±721	29.9%±0.5 pp322,586±5,056	▲ +1.7%	13/50
30–44 Minutes	28.8%±2.7 pp7,345±677	29.6%±0.4 pp318,782±4,584	▼ -0.8%	30/50
45–59 Minutes	12.6%±1.7 pp3,218±434	14.0%±0.3 pp151,451±3,075	▼ -1.4%	33/50
60 Minutes or More	11.0%±1.7 pp2,819±424	13.4%±0.3 pp144,940±3,715	▼ -2.4%	36/50
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category	Ward 41
Average Vehicles per Household	1.64±0.08
Households With No Vehicle	7.3% ±1.3 pp1,722 ±317
Households With 1 Vehicle	40.3% ±3.0 pp9,483 ±706
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	52.4% ±2.8 pp12,324 ±664
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Average Vehicles per Household	1.64±0.08	1.12±0.01	▲ +0.52	5/50
Households With No Vehicle	7.3%±1.3 pp1,722±317	26.6%±0.4 pp308,497±5,087	▼ -19.3%	49/50
Households With 1 Vehicle	40.3%±3.0 pp9,483±706	45.2%±0.4 pp524,900±5,145	▼ -4.9%	42/50
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	52.4%±2.8 pp12,324±664	28.2%±0.4 pp326,808±4,200	▲ +24.2%	5/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Ward 41 Residents Work

Category	Ward 41
Loop	23.3%6,830
Near North Side	4.8%1,418
Near West Side	3.5%1,035
O'Hare	3.2%924
Norwood Park	2.5%733
All other city neighborhoods	14.3%4,189
Outside the city	48.3%14,156
↳ Des Plaines city, IL	2.2%657
↳ Park Ridge city, IL	2.2%633
↳ Skokie village, IL	1.9%559
↳ Niles village, IL	1.8%519
↳ Schaumburg village, IL	1.7%510
↳ All other Illinois locations	37.1%10,864
Out of state	1.4%414
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for ward 41 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference
Loop	23.3%6,830	21.5%259,168	▲ +1.8%
Near North Side	4.8%1,418	9.1%109,334	▼ -4.2%
Near West Side	3.5%1,035	6.7%80,119	▼ -3.1%
O'Hare	3.2%924	1.3%16,140	▲ +1.8%
Norwood Park	2.5%733	0.4%5,036	▲ +2.1%
All other city neighborhoods	14.3%4,189	21.1%253,663	▼ -6.8%
Outside the city	48.3%14,156	35.9%432,365	▲ +12.4%
↳ Des Plaines city, IL	2.2%657	0.8%9,268	▲ +1.5%
↳ Park Ridge city, IL	2.2%633	0.4%4,516	▲ +1.8%
↳ Skokie village, IL	1.9%559	1.3%15,779	▲ +0.6%
↳ Niles village, IL	1.8%519	0.6%6,892	▲ +1.2%
↳ Schaumburg village, IL	1.7%510	0.9%10,377	▲ +0.9%
↳ All other Illinois locations	37.1%10,864	27.4%330,297	▲ +9.7%
Out of state	1.4%414	2.2%26,136	▼ -0.8%
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for ward 41 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Loop	20.3%5,656	21.4%6,215	23.3%6,830	▲ +3.0 pp▲ +1,174▲ +1.9 pp▲ +615▲ +1.1 pp▲ +559
Chicago citywide	20.0%224,635	21.0%252,791	21.5%259,168	▲ +1.5 pp▲ +34,533▲ +0.5 pp▲ +6,377▲ +1.0 pp▲ +28,156
Near North Side	4.3%1,207	4.7%1,351	4.8%1,418	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +211▲ +0.2 pp▲ +67▲ +0.3 pp▲ +144
Chicago citywide	8.2%92,142	9.4%112,858	9.1%109,334	▲ +0.9 pp▲ +17,192▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3,524▲ +1.2 pp▲ +20,716
Near West Side	3.0%831	3.5%1,000	3.5%1,035	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +204▲ +0.1 pp▲ +35▲ +0.5 pp▲ +169
Chicago citywide	6.2%69,083	6.6%79,757	6.7%80,119	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +11,036– 0.0 pp▲ +362▲ +0.5 pp▲ +10,674
O'Hare	3.7%1,021	3.4%994	3.2%924	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −97▼ −0.3 pp▼ −70▼ −0.2 pp▼ −27
Chicago citywide	1.4%15,962	1.3%15,632	1.3%16,140	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +178– 0.0 pp▲ +508▼ −0.1 pp▼ −330
Norwood Park	3.2%879	2.5%730	2.5%733	▼ −0.7 pp▼ −146– 0.0 pp▲ +3▼ −0.6 pp▼ −149
Chicago citywide	0.6%7,159	0.5%5,527	0.4%5,036	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,123– 0.0 pp▼ −491▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,632
All other city neighborhoods	16.6%4,622	15.6%4,512	14.3%4,189	▼ −2.3 pp▼ −433▼ −1.3 pp▼ −323▼ −1.0 pp▼ −110
Chicago citywide	22.9%257,015	21.5%259,132	21.1%253,663	▼ −1.8 pp▼ −3,352▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,469▼ −1.4 pp▲ +2,117
Outside the city	49.0%13,643	48.9%14,182	48.3%14,156	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +513▼ −0.6 pp▼ −26– 0.0 pp▲ +539
Chicago citywide	36.8%412,807	35.7%430,135	35.9%432,365	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +19,558▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,230▼ −1.0 pp▲ +17,328
Des Plaines city, IL	2.1%593	2.1%597	2.2%657	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +64▲ +0.2 pp▲ +60▼ −0.1 pp▲ +4
Chicago citywide	0.8%9,241	0.8%9,141	0.8%9,268	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +27– 0.0 pp▲ +127▼ −0.1 pp▼ −100
Park Ridge city, IL	2.0%548	2.2%631	2.2%633	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +85– 0.0 pp▲ +2▲ +0.2 pp▲ +83
Chicago citywide	0.4%4,249	0.4%4,567	0.4%4,516	– 0.0 pp▲ +267– 0.0 pp▼ −51– 0.0 pp▲ +318
Skokie village, IL	1.9%528	1.7%501	1.9%559	– 0.0 pp▲ +31▲ +0.2 pp▲ +58▼ −0.2 pp▼ −27
Chicago citywide	1.1%12,426	1.1%12,901	1.3%15,779	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +3,353▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,878– 0.0 pp▲ +475
Niles village, IL	1.9%541	2.0%575	1.8%519	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −22▼ −0.2 pp▼ −56– 0.0 pp▲ +34
Chicago citywide	0.6%6,284	0.6%6,624	0.6%6,892	– 0.0 pp▲ +608– 0.0 pp▲ +268– 0.0 pp▲ +340
Schaumburg village, IL	1.7%487	1.9%560	1.7%510	– 0.0 pp▲ +23▼ −0.2 pp▼ −50▲ +0.2 pp▲ +73
Chicago citywide	1.1%11,818	1.0%11,930	0.9%10,377	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,441▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,553▼ −0.1 pp▲ +112
All other Illinois locations	37.8%10,536	37.5%10,866	37.1%10,864	▼ −0.7 pp▲ +328▼ −0.4 pp▼ −2▼ −0.3 pp▲ +330
Chicago citywide	28.0%314,112	27.1%326,235	27.4%330,297	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +16,185▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,062▼ −0.9 pp▲ +12,123
Out of state	1.4%391	1.4%403	1.4%414	– 0.0 pp▲ +23– 0.0 pp▲ +11– 0.0 pp▲ +12
Chicago citywide	2.2%24,577	2.3%27,198	2.2%26,136	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,559▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,062▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,621

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Ward 41

Category	Ward 41
Norwood Park	1.8%1,132
Portage Park	1.5%977
Lake View	1.4%912
Austin	1.4%879
Logan Square	1.3%844
All other city neighborhoods	25.2%16,016
Outside the city	67.3%42,785
↳ Des Plaines city, IL	1.8%1,128
↳ Schaumburg village, IL	1.4%914
↳ Park Ridge city, IL	1.2%772
↳ Arlington Heights village, IL	1.2%733
↳ Mount Prospect village, IL	1.0%665
↳ All other Illinois locations	50.6%32,182
Out of state	10.1%6,391
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in ward 41; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference
Norwood Park	1.8%1,132	0.7%10,975	▲ +1.0%
Portage Park	1.5%977	1.1%16,320	▲ +0.4%
Lake View	1.4%912	3.1%44,776	▼ -1.6%
Austin	1.4%879	1.4%20,631	0%
Logan Square	1.3%844	1.9%27,408	▼ -0.5%
All other city neighborhoods	25.2%16,016	37.1%542,952	▼ -11.9%
Outside the city	67.3%42,785	47.2%691,556	▲ +20.1%
↳ Des Plaines city, IL	1.8%1,128	0.5%8,039	▲ +1.2%
↳ Schaumburg village, IL	1.4%914	0.4%5,989	▲ +1.0%
↳ Park Ridge city, IL	1.2%772	0.4%6,331	▲ +0.8%
↳ Arlington Heights village, IL	1.2%733	0.5%6,804	▲ +0.7%
↳ Mount Prospect village, IL	1.0%665	0.3%4,939	▲ +0.7%
↳ All other Illinois locations	50.6%32,182	37.0%540,957	▲ +13.7%
Out of state	10.1%6,391	4.9%72,124	▲ +5.1%
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in ward 41; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Norwood Park	2.0%1,337	2.0%1,178	1.8%1,132	▼ −0.3 pp▼ −205▼ −0.2 pp▼ −46▼ −0.1 pp▼ −159
Chicago citywide	0.8%10,371	0.8%10,775	0.7%10,975	– 0.0 pp▲ +604– 0.0 pp▲ +200– 0.0 pp▲ +404
Portage Park	1.8%1,178	1.7%1,004	1.5%977	▼ −0.3 pp▼ −201▼ −0.1 pp▼ −27▼ −0.1 pp▼ −174
Chicago citywide	1.2%15,600	1.1%16,115	1.1%16,320	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +720– 0.0 pp▲ +205– 0.0 pp▲ +515
Lake View	1.6%1,023	1.4%835	1.4%912	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −111– 0.0 pp▲ +77▼ −0.2 pp▼ −188
Chicago citywide	3.2%41,852	3.2%45,855	3.1%44,776	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,924▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,079▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,003
Austin	1.5%958	1.6%924	1.4%879	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −79▼ −0.2 pp▼ −45▲ +0.1 pp▼ −34
Chicago citywide	1.5%19,532	1.4%20,284	1.4%20,631	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,099– 0.0 pp▲ +347▼ −0.1 pp▲ +752
Logan Square	1.2%810	1.4%856	1.3%844	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +34▼ −0.1 pp▼ −12▲ +0.2 pp▲ +46
Chicago citywide	1.9%25,257	1.9%27,590	1.9%27,408	– 0.0 pp▲ +2,151▼ −0.1 pp▼ −182– 0.0 pp▲ +2,333
All other city neighborhoods	27.1%17,788	26.9%16,003	25.2%16,016	▼ −1.9 pp▼ −1,772▼ −1.7 pp▲ +13▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,785
Chicago citywide	38.3%503,539	38.2%541,560	37.1%542,952	▼ −1.2 pp▲ +39,413▼ −1.1 pp▲ +1,392▼ −0.1 pp▲ +38,021
Outside the city	64.6%42,360	65.1%38,781	67.3%42,785	▲ +2.8 pp▲ +425▲ +2.2 pp▲ +4,004▲ +0.5 pp▼ −3,579
Chicago citywide	45.9%603,753	45.4%642,891	47.2%691,556	▲ +1.3 pp▲ +87,803▲ +1.9 pp▲ +48,665▼ −0.6 pp▲ +39,138
Des Plaines city, IL	1.7%1,134	1.9%1,138	1.8%1,128	– 0.0 pp▼ −6▼ −0.1 pp▼ −10▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4
Chicago citywide	0.5%6,821	0.5%7,586	0.5%8,039	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,218– 0.0 pp▲ +453– 0.0 pp▲ +765
Schaumburg village, IL	1.5%1,011	1.4%820	1.4%914	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −97▲ +0.1 pp▲ +94▼ −0.2 pp▼ −191
Chicago citywide	0.4%5,343	0.4%5,357	0.4%5,989	– 0.0 pp▲ +646– 0.0 pp▲ +632– 0.0 pp▲ +14
Park Ridge city, IL	1.3%838	1.3%762	1.2%772	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −66▼ −0.1 pp▲ +10– 0.0 pp▼ −76
Chicago citywide	0.4%5,581	0.4%5,761	0.4%6,331	– 0.0 pp▲ +750– 0.0 pp▲ +570– 0.0 pp▲ +180
Arlington Heights village, IL	1.2%806	1.2%707	1.2%733	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −73– 0.0 pp▲ +26– 0.0 pp▼ −99
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,936	0.4%6,135	0.5%6,804	– 0.0 pp▲ +868– 0.0 pp▲ +669– 0.0 pp▲ +199
Mount Prospect village, IL	1.3%848	1.3%746	1.0%665	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −183▼ −0.2 pp▼ −81– 0.0 pp▼ −102
Chicago citywide	0.4%4,980	0.3%4,806	0.3%4,939	– 0.0 pp▼ −41– 0.0 pp▲ +133– 0.0 pp▼ −174
All other Illinois locations	47.6%31,211	48.2%28,729	50.6%32,182	▲ +3.1 pp▲ +971▲ +2.4 pp▲ +3,453▲ +0.6 pp▼ −2,482
Chicago citywide	35.6%467,892	35.1%497,967	37.0%540,957	▲ +1.4 pp▲ +73,065▲ +1.8 pp▲ +42,990▼ −0.5 pp▲ +30,075
Out of state	9.9%6,512	9.9%5,879	10.1%6,391	▲ +0.1 pp▼ −121▲ +0.2 pp▲ +512▼ −0.1 pp▼ −633
Chicago citywide	4.9%63,789	4.8%68,287	4.9%72,124	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8,335▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,837– 0.0 pp▲ +4,498

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category	Ward 41
No Computer or Smartphone	4.9% ±1.1 pp1,144 ±264
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	7.3% ±1.4 pp1,726 ±322
Desktop or Laptop Available	83.9% ±2.4 pp19,748 ±570
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
No Computer or Smartphone	4.9%±1.1 pp1,144±264	5.1%±0.2 pp58,709±2,246	▼ -0.2%	27/50
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	7.3%±1.4 pp1,726±322	10.4%±0.3 pp120,218±3,642	▼ -3.0%	38/50
Desktop or Laptop Available	83.9%±2.4 pp19,748±570	79.7%±0.4 pp924,956±4,919	▲ +4.2%	17/50
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category	Ward 41
Has Internet Access	94.0% ±1.7 pp22,118 ±403
Cellular Data Plan Only	11.4% ±1.7 pp2,678 ±395
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	2.0% ±0.8 pp469 ±193
No Internet Access	6.0% ±1.3 pp1,411 ±302
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Has Internet Access	94.0%±1.7 pp22,118±403	93.1%±0.3 pp1,080,419±3,310	▲ +0.9%	21/50
Cellular Data Plan Only	11.4%±1.7 pp2,678±395	12.5%±0.3 pp145,219±3,463	▼ -1.1%	34/50
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	2.0%±0.8 pp469±193	3.9%±0.2 pp45,350±1,940	▼ -1.9%	43/50
No Internet Access	6.0%±1.3 pp1,411±302	6.9%±0.2 pp79,786±2,730	▼ -0.9%	30/50
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category	Ward 41
Uninsured Residents	5.9% ±1.1 pp3,435 ±643
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	1.6% ±1.0 pp902 ±584
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	9.1% ±1.8 pp5,314 ±1,051
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	0.7% ±0.8 pp429 ±475
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Uninsured Residents	5.9%±1.1 pp3,435±643	9.8%±0.2 pp264,391±5,512	▼ -3.8%	38/50
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	1.6%±1.0 pp902±584	3.9%±0.3 pp104,687±8,689	▼ -2.3%	45/50
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	9.1%±1.8 pp5,314±1,051	13.3%±0.3 pp361,430±8,202	▼ -4.2%	38/50
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	0.7%±0.8 pp429±475	1.7%±0.3 pp46,718±7,559	▼ -1.0%	42/50
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category	Ward 41
Insured (Any Coverage)	94.1% ±1.1 pp54,277 ±639
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	65.4% ±1.0 pp37,735 ±595
Direct-Purchase Insurance	9.5% ±1.0 pp5,462 ±601
Medicare	15.5% ±1.4 pp8,964 ±804
Medicaid	8.9% ±1.3 pp5,154 ±754
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.3% ±0.3 pp179 ±200
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	4.1% ±0.8 pp2,350 ±471
Uninsured	5.9% ±1.1 pp3,411 ±639
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Insured (Any Coverage)	94.1%±1.1 pp54,277±639	90.2%±0.2 pp2,424,871±5,689	▲ +3.8%	13/50
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	65.4%±1.0 pp37,735±595	51.2%±0.4 pp1,376,912±9,468	▲ +14.2%	10/50
Direct-Purchase Insurance	9.5%±1.0 pp5,462±601	8.5%±0.2 pp227,424±5,112	▲ +1.0%	17/50
Medicare	15.5%±1.4 pp8,964±804	12.6%±0.2 pp339,804±4,911	▲ +2.9%	11/50
Medicaid	8.9%±1.3 pp5,154±754	22.2%±0.3 pp596,931±7,773	▼ -13.3%	42/50
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.3%±0.3 pp179±200	0.3%±0.0 pp7,201±787	0%	17/50
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	4.1%±0.8 pp2,350±471	3.8%±0.1 pp102,777±3,544	▲ +0.2%	22/50
Uninsured	5.9%±1.1 pp3,411±639	9.8%±0.2 pp262,018±5,689	▼ -3.8%	38/50
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category	Ward 41
Adults With at Least One Disability	11.5% ±1.3 pp5,154 ±579
Mobility Disability	6.3% ±1.1 pp2,819 ±491
Hearing Disability	3.3% ±0.7 pp1,489 ±304
Vision Disability	2.2% ±0.6 pp978 ±266
Cognitive Disability	3.5% ±0.7 pp1,578 ±309
Self-Care Disability	2.2% ±0.6 pp961 ±268
Independent Living Disability	4.2% ±0.7 pp1,880 ±330
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability	11.5%±1.3 pp5,154±579	14.0%±0.2 pp303,665±4,797	▼ -2.5%	35/50
Mobility Disability	6.3%±1.1 pp2,819±491	7.6%±0.2 pp163,666±3,398	▼ -1.3%	31/50
Hearing Disability	3.3%±0.7 pp1,489±304	2.8%±0.1 pp61,430±2,337	▲ +0.5%	19/50
Vision Disability	2.2%±0.6 pp978±266	3.0%±0.1 pp64,544±2,269	▼ -0.8%	34/50
Cognitive Disability	3.5%±0.7 pp1,578±309	5.2%±0.1 pp112,824±2,939	▼ -1.7%	42/50
Self-Care Disability	2.2%±0.6 pp961±268	2.7%±0.1 pp57,758±2,261	▼ -0.5%	36/50
Independent Living Disability	4.2%±0.7 pp1,880±330	5.7%±0.2 pp123,651±3,247	▼ -1.5%	40/50
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category	Ward 41
Arthritis	22.7%10,159
High Blood Pressure	28.3%12,675
Cancer	8.4%3,770
Current Asthma	9.4%4,202
Coronary Heart Disease	5.1%2,295
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	5.4%2,410
Diabetes	9.3%4,146
High Cholesterol	35.1%15,714
Obesity	27.0%12,075
Stroke	2.8%1,248
Lost All Natural Teeth	1.9%833
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Arthritis	22.7%10,159	19.6%409,178	▲ +3.1%	15/50
High Blood Pressure	28.3%12,675	29.7%620,030	▼ -1.4%	25/50
Cancer	8.4%3,770	5.0%104,382	▲ +3.4%	1/50
Current Asthma	9.4%4,202	10.2%212,940	▼ -0.8%	26/50
Coronary Heart Disease	5.1%2,295	4.8%100,207	▲ +0.3%	20/50
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	5.4%2,410	5.5%114,820	▼ -0.1%	23/50
Diabetes	9.3%4,146	12.0%250,517	▼ -2.7%	40/50
High Cholesterol	35.1%15,714	31.6%659,696	▲ +3.5%	5/50
Obesity	27.0%12,075	32.6%680,572	▼ -5.6%	41/50
Stroke	2.8%1,248	3.3%68,892	▼ -0.5%	32/50
Lost All Natural Teeth	1.9%833	2.5%52,249	▼ -0.6%	33/50
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category	Ward 41
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	20.1%8,973
Current Cigarette Smoking	9.9%4,412
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	18.6%8,327
Short Sleep Duration	32.1%14,340
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	20.1%8,973	19.0%396,652	▲ +1.1%	17/50
Current Cigarette Smoking	9.9%4,412	11.9%248,430	▼ -2.0%	40/50
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	18.6%8,327	24.7%515,648	▼ -6.1%	40/50
Short Sleep Duration	32.1%14,340	37.8%789,129	▼ -5.7%	44/50
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category	Ward 41
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	14.9%6,687
Frequent Physical Distress	10.6%4,755
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	14.9%6,687	21.1%440,493	▼ -6.2%	41/50
Frequent Physical Distress	10.6%4,755	11.8%246,342	▼ -1.2%	35/50
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category	Ward 41
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	74.1%33,155
Routine Checkup in Past Year	77.5%34,670
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	89.5%40,029
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	60.6%27,129
Dental Visit in Past Year	68.0%30,441
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	74.9%33,513
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	74.1%33,155	72.5%1,513,542	▲ +1.6%	13/50
Routine Checkup in Past Year	77.5%34,670	76.2%1,590,785	▲ +1.3%	18/50
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	89.5%40,029	86.2%1,799,549	▲ +3.3%	4/50
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	60.6%27,129	55.8%1,164,905	▲ +4.8%	8/50
Dental Visit in Past Year	68.0%30,441	58.4%1,219,184	▲ +9.6%	10/50
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	74.9%33,513	74.2%1,549,032	▲ +0.7%	20/50
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category	Ward 41
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	20.0%8,941
Frequent Mental Distress	13.9%6,229
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	23.0%10,286
Loneliness	31.6%14,129
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 41	City	Difference	Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	20.0%8,941	19.1%398,740	▲ +0.9%	10/50
Frequent Mental Distress	13.9%6,229	16.0%334,023	▼ -2.1%	45/50
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	23.0%10,286	28.2%588,716	▼ -5.2%	43/50
Loneliness	31.6%14,129	35.8%747,377	▼ -4.2%	49/50
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Compare All Wards

Chicago City Council Ward 41

Ward 41 at a Glance

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Age Distribution

Educational Attainment

Population

Household Size

Marital Status

Language Spoken at Home

English Proficiency

Household Composition

Children by Household Type

Veteran Status

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Poverty Status

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Occupation

Industry of Employment

Class of Worker

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Earnings of All Workers

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 41

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 41 in Lower-Income Families

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Ward 41

Local Businesses

Jobs in Ward 41

Industry of Jobs in Ward 41

Earnings of Jobs in Ward 41

Jobs in Ward 41 by Firm Age

Jobs in Ward 41 by Firm Size

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

College Enrollment

Student Digital Access

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Year Moved Into Current Home

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Housing Vacancy Status

Housing Age

Housing Units by Building Size

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Overcrowded Housing

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Monthly Housing Costs

Rent

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Home Values

Federal Housing Assistance

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Commute Time

Household Vehicle Access

Where Ward 41 Residents Work

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Ward 41

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Household Internet Access

Health

Health Insurance

Health Insurance Coverage Types