Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category	Ward 33
Hispanic	45.8% ±3.3 pp25,658 ±1,853
White	36.2% ±2.0 pp20,257 ±1,108
Black	4.0% ±1.0 pp2,214 ±580
Asian	10.6% ±1.5 pp5,942 ±865
Other or Multi-racial	3.4% ±0.7 pp1,926 ±376
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Hispanic	45.8%±3.3 pp25,658±1,853	29.7%±0.2 pp805,318±5,785	▲ +16.1%	14/50
White	36.2%±2.0 pp20,257±1,108	32.1%±0.2 pp870,127±5,557	▲ +4.1%	20/50
Black	4.0%±1.0 pp2,214±580	27.4%±0.2 pp743,710±6,047	▼ -23.5%	36/50
Asian	10.6%±1.5 pp5,942±865	7.2%±0.2 pp196,435±4,370	▲ +3.4%	11/50
Other or Multi-racial	3.4%±0.7 pp1,926±376	3.5%±0.1 pp95,636±3,778	▼ -0.1%	25/50
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Hispanic	57.0% ±2.8 pp35,845 ±1,733	49.5% ±2.8 pp29,718 ±1,659	45.8% ±3.3 pp25,658 ±1,853	▼ −11.1 pp▼ −10,187▼ −3.7 pp▼ −4,060▼ −7.4 pp▼ −6,127
Chicago citywide	28.9% ±0.2 pp785,292 ±4,750	28.8% ±0.2 pp780,167 ±5,832	29.7% ±0.2 pp805,318 ±5,785	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +20,026▲ +0.9 pp▲ +25,151▼ −0.2 pp▼ −5,125
White	29.0% ±1.4 pp18,227 ±878	31.6% ±1.4 pp18,954 ±810	36.2% ±2.0 pp20,257 ±1,108	▲ +7.2 pp▲ +2,030▲ +4.6 pp▲ +1,303▲ +2.6 pp▲ +727
Chicago citywide	32.2% ±0.2 pp872,513 ±4,319	33.3% ±0.2 pp901,769 ±4,468	32.1% ±0.2 pp870,127 ±5,557	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2,386▼ −1.2 pp▼ −31,642▲ +1.1 pp▲ +29,256
Black	3.2% ±0.7 pp2,036 ±424	4.7% ±0.9 pp2,832 ±530	4.0% ±1.0 pp2,214 ±580	▲ +0.7 pp▲ +178▼ −0.8 pp▼ −618▲ +1.5 pp▲ +796
Chicago citywide	31.5% ±0.1 pp853,214 ±3,755	29.2% ±0.2 pp790,893 ±4,690	27.4% ±0.2 pp743,710 ±6,047	▼ −4.0 pp▼ −109,504▼ −1.8 pp▼ −47,183▼ −2.3 pp▼ −62,321
Asian	8.8% ±1.2 pp5,559 ±755	11.5% ±1.2 pp6,874 ±707	10.6% ±1.5 pp5,942 ±865	▲ +1.8 pp▲ +383▼ −0.8 pp▼ −932▲ +2.6 pp▲ +1,315
Chicago citywide	5.7% ±0.1 pp154,287 ±2,942	6.5% ±0.1 pp177,195 ±3,532	7.2% ±0.2 pp196,435 ±4,370	▲ +1.6 pp▲ +42,148▲ +0.7 pp▲ +19,240▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,908
Other or Multi-racial	2.0% ±0.5 pp1,264 ±335	2.7% ±0.7 pp1,636 ±392	3.4% ±0.7 pp1,926 ±376	▲ +1.4 pp▲ +662▲ +0.7 pp▲ +290▲ +0.7 pp▲ +372
Chicago citywide	1.7% ±0.1 pp47,302 ±1,990	2.2% ±0.1 pp59,510 ±2,584	3.5% ±0.1 pp95,636 ±3,778	▲ +1.8 pp▲ +48,334▲ +1.3 pp▲ +36,126▲ +0.5 pp▲ +12,208

Age Distribution

Category	Ward 33
Under 5	5.9% ±0.9 pp3,311 ±503
5-17	13.4% ±1.2 pp7,491 ±657
18-24	10.5% ±1.2 pp5,882 ±666
25-44	37.3% ±1.3 pp20,899 ±732
45-64	22.7% ±1.1 pp12,733 ±612
65-74	6.5% ±0.8 pp3,634 ±447
75-84	2.9% ±0.5 pp1,615 ±281
85+	0.8% ±0.3 pp433 ±161
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Under 5	5.9%±0.9 pp3,311±503	5.3%±0.1 pp144,044±3,726	▲ +0.6%	14/50
5-17	13.4%±1.2 pp7,491±657	14.1%±0.2 pp381,582±5,292	▼ -0.7%	32/50
18-24	10.5%±1.2 pp5,882±666	9.6%±0.2 pp260,942±4,703	▲ +0.9%	17/50
25-44	37.3%±1.3 pp20,899±732	34.3%±0.2 pp929,946±6,124	▲ +3.0%	17/50
45-64	22.7%±1.1 pp12,733±612	22.9%±0.2 pp620,047±5,184	▼ -0.1%	30/50
65-74	6.5%±0.8 pp3,634±447	8.2%±0.1 pp221,932±3,538	▼ -1.7%	40/50
75-84	2.9%±0.5 pp1,615±281	4.0%±0.1 pp107,625±2,624	▼ -1.1%	41/50
85+	0.8%±0.3 pp433±161	1.7%±0.1 pp45,108±1,900	▼ -0.9%	46/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category	Ward 33
No High School Diploma	16.2% ±1.9 pp6,367 ±738
High School Diploma or GED	18.7% ±1.9 pp7,344 ±743
Some College or Associate's Degree	17.3% ±1.5 pp6,807 ±572
Bachelor's Degree	30.7% ±1.9 pp12,075 ±740
Graduate Degree	17.1% ±1.4 pp6,744 ±540
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
No High School Diploma	16.2%±1.9 pp6,367±738	12.8%±0.2 pp246,015±4,665	▲ +3.4%	20/50
High School Diploma or GED	18.7%±1.9 pp7,344±743	21.1%±0.3 pp405,248±5,594	▼ -2.4%	32/50
Some College or Associate's Degree	17.3%±1.5 pp6,807±572	21.8%±0.3 pp419,911±5,261	▼ -4.5%	42/50
Bachelor's Degree	30.7%±1.9 pp12,075±740	25.4%±0.3 pp488,467±5,561	▲ +5.3%	15/50
Graduate Degree	17.1%±1.4 pp6,744±540	19.0%±0.3 pp365,017±4,874	▼ -1.8%	22/50
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category	Ward 33
Total Population	55,997 ±2,575
Total Households	22,462 ±880
Population Density	25,127 ±1,156 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	Average Ward	Difference
Total Population	55,997	54,206	▲ +1,791
Total Households	22,462	23,200	▼ −738
Population Density	25,127 people/sq mi	16,281 people/sq mi	▲ +8,846
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average ward rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large wards. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19	Difference	Rank
Total Population	62,931 ±2,308	60,013 ±2,044	55,997 ±2,575	▼ −6,934 ±3,458▼ −4,016 ±3,288▼ −2,918 ±3,083	▲ +8,701▲ +5,847▲ +1,791	1/503/5020/50
Average Ward	54,230	54,166	54,206	▼ −24▲ +40▼ −64
Total Households	20,726 ±494	21,007 ±553	22,462 ±880	▲ +1,736 ±1,009▲ +1,455 ±1,039▲ +281 ±742	▲ +158▼ −313▼ −738	23/5025/5023/50
Average Ward	20,568	21,320	23,200	▲ +2,631▲ +1,880▲ +751
Population Density (per sq mi)	28,239 ±1,036	26,929 ±917	25,127 ±1,156	▼ −3,111▼ −1,802▼ −1,309	▲ +12,323▲ +10,817▲ +8,846	5/507/508/50
Average Ward Density	15,916	16,112	16,281	▲ +366▲ +169▲ +196

Household Size

Category	Ward 33
Average Household Size	2.47±0.12
1-Person Households	28.3% ±2.2 pp6,347 ±484
2-Person Households	35.1% ±2.4 pp7,876 ±538
3-Person Households	14.8% ±1.9 pp3,314 ±426
4+ Person Households	21.9% ±2.2 pp4,925 ±496
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Size	2.47±0.12	2.29±0.02	▲ +0.18	24/50
1-Person Households	28.3%±2.2 pp6,347±484	39.7%±0.4 pp460,268±4,301	▼ -11.4%	39/50
2-Person Households	35.1%±2.4 pp7,876±538	29.5%±0.4 pp342,235±4,195	▲ +5.6%	4/50
3-Person Households	14.8%±1.9 pp3,314±426	12.9%±0.3 pp149,291±3,231	▲ +1.9%	22/50
4+ Person Households	21.9%±2.2 pp4,925±496	18.0%±0.3 pp208,411±4,023	▲ +4.0%	24/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category	Ward 33
Never Married	46.8% ±2.1 pp22,104 ±1,014
Married	41.1% ±1.0 pp19,427 ±467
Separated	2.1% ±0.7 pp986 ±310
Divorced	6.4% ±0.8 pp3,020 ±390
Widowed	3.6% ±0.7 pp1,686 ±329
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Never Married	46.8%±2.1 pp22,104±1,014	49.6%±0.3 pp1,130,286±6,623	▼ -2.8%	33/50
Married	41.1%±1.0 pp19,427±467	35.5%±0.3 pp807,294±6,077	▲ +5.7%	16/50
Separated	2.1%±0.7 pp986±310	2.2%±0.1 pp49,430±2,379	▼ -0.1%	24/50
Divorced	6.4%±0.8 pp3,020±390	7.9%±0.2 pp180,700±3,966	▼ -1.5%	34/50
Widowed	3.6%±0.7 pp1,686±329	4.8%±0.1 pp109,357±2,738	▼ -1.2%	36/50
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category	Ward 33
Speak English Only	47.4% ±1.8 pp25,388 ±976
Spanish	37.2% ±2.9 pp19,936 ±1,569
Tagalog (incl. Filipino)	4.2% ±1.2 pp2,230 ±625
Other Indo-European	3.1% ±0.9 pp1,652 ±456
Other Languages	2.9% ±0.7 pp1,547 ±370
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic	2.6% ±1.2 pp1,389 ±669
Other Asian and Pacific Island	1.5% ±0.6 pp829 ±318
Arabic	1.0% ±0.4 pp551 ±239
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this ward, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Speak English Only	47.4%±1.8 pp25,388±976	64.6%±0.3 pp1,659,069±8,218	▼ -17.2%	40/50
Spanish	37.2%±2.9 pp19,936±1,569	23.7%±0.2 pp607,865±6,166	▲ +13.6%	14/50
Tagalog (incl. Filipino)	4.2%±1.2 pp2,230±625	0.8%±0.1 pp20,222±1,843	▲ +3.4%	2/10
Other Indo-European	3.1%±0.9 pp1,652±456	2.4%±0.1 pp61,672±3,192	▲ +0.7%	12/27
Other Languages	2.9%±0.7 pp1,547±370	1.0%±0.1 pp25,292±2,452	▲ +1.9%	24/50
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic	2.6%±1.2 pp1,389±669	2.6%±0.1 pp67,932±3,529	▼ -0.1%	17/30
Other Asian and Pacific Island	1.5%±0.6 pp829±318	0.9%±0.1 pp22,472±2,251	▲ +0.7%	12/16
Arabic	1.0%±0.4 pp551±239	0.5%±0.1 pp13,601±1,716	▲ +0.5%	6/6
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this ward, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 33
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	74.2% ±1.0 pp74.2%±1.0 pp39,108 ±536
Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents age 5+)	25.8% ±2.3 pp25.8%±2.3 pp13,578 ±1,190
↳ Speaks English Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	13.4% ±1.6 pp51.9%±4.4 pp7,050 ±861
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	8.4% ±1.4 pp32.6%±4.7 pp4,422 ±746
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	4.0% ±1.1 pp15.5%±4.1 pp2,107 ±589
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	74.2%±1.0 pp74.2%±1.0 pp39,108±536	85.4%±0.5 pp85.4%±0.5 pp2,192,778±11,961	▼ -11.2%▼ -11.2%	42/50
Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents age 5+)	25.8%±2.3 pp25.8%±2.3 pp13,578±1,190	14.6%±0.3 pp14.6%±0.3 pp374,404±6,794	▲ +11.2%▲ +11.2%	9/50
↳ Speaks English Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	13.4%±1.6 pp51.9%±4.4 pp7,050±861	7.1%±0.2 pp48.9%±0.9 pp183,252±4,686	▲ +6.2%▲ +3.0%	7/5027/50
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	8.4%±1.4 pp32.6%±4.7 pp4,422±746	5.2%±0.2 pp35.6%±0.8 pp133,269±3,923	▲ +3.2%▼ -3.0%	12/5030/50
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	4.0%±1.1 pp15.5%±4.1 pp2,107±589	2.3%±0.1 pp15.5%±0.7 pp57,883±2,982	▲ +1.7%▲ +0.1%	10/5022/50
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category	Ward 33
Married-Couple Households	39.0% ±2.4 pp8,759 ±537
Unmarried-Couple Households	11.5% ±1.6 pp2,591 ±352
One-Person Households	28.3% ±2.5 pp6,347 ±553
Other Household Types	21.2% ±5.7 pp4,764 ±1,284
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Married-Couple Households	39.0%±2.4 pp8,759±537	30.9%±0.3 pp358,432±3,598	▲ +8.1%	17/50
Unmarried-Couple Households	11.5%±1.6 pp2,591±352	8.3%±0.2 pp96,220±2,797	▲ +3.2%	8/50
One-Person Households	28.3%±2.5 pp6,347±553	39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,729	▼ -11.4%	39/50
Other Household Types	21.2%±5.7 pp4,764±1,284	21.1%±0.7 pp245,285±8,514	▲ +0.1%	24/50
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category	Ward 33
Children in Married-Couple Households	66.2% ±3.6 pp7,273 ±391
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	11.9% ±3.7 pp1,310 ±405
Children in Single-Mother Households	19.4% ±5.4 pp2,129 ±592
Children in Single-Father Households	2.5% ±1.1 pp279 ±118
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households	66.2%±3.6 pp7,273±391	56.0%±0.8 pp293,542±4,257	▲ +10.2%	21/50
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	11.9%±3.7 pp1,310±405	8.8%±0.6 pp45,960±3,208	▲ +3.1%	10/50
Children in Single-Mother Households	19.4%±5.4 pp2,129±592	30.6%±0.9 pp160,535±4,521	▼ -11.3%	32/50
Children in Single-Father Households	2.5%±1.1 pp279±118	4.6%±0.4 pp24,133±2,006	▼ -2.1%	44/50
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 33
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	1.1% ±0.3 pp1.1%±0.3 pp490 ±151
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	41.5% ±28.5 pp0.4%±0.3 pp203 ±140
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	14.1% ±20.8 pp0.2%±0.2 pp69 ±102
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	23.5% ±23.1 pp0.3%±0.2 pp115 ±113
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	0.0% ±18.7 pp0.0%0
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	21.0% ±30.9 pp0.2%±0.3 pp103 ±151
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	1.1%±0.3 pp1.1%±0.3 pp490±151	2.8%±0.1 pp2.8%±0.1 pp60,766±2,397	▼ -1.7%▼ -1.7%	48/50
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	41.5%±28.5 pp0.4%±0.3 pp203±140	26.8%±1.8 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,267±1,067	▲ +14.7%▼ -0.3%	10/5043/50
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	14.1%±20.8 pp0.2%±0.2 pp69±102	12.9%±1.0 pp0.4%±0.0 pp7,830±579	▲ +1.2%▼ -0.2%	20/5036/50
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	23.5%±23.1 pp0.3%±0.2 pp115±113	28.8%±1.4 pp0.8%±0.0 pp17,525±846	▼ -5.4%▼ -0.5%	38/5045/50
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	0.0%±18.7 pp0.0%0	4.9%±0.7 pp0.1%±0.0 pp2,995±441	▼ -4.9%▼ -0.1%	47/5047/50
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	21.0%±30.9 pp0.2%±0.3 pp103±151	26.6%±1.5 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,149±916	▼ -5.6%▼ -0.5%	34/5049/50
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 33
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	66.6% ±1.9 pp66.6%±1.9 pp37,298 ±1,050
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	33.4% ±2.4 pp33.4%±2.4 pp18,699 ±1,344
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	14.5% ±1.3 pp43.3%±2.5 pp8,095 ±743
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	18.9% ±2.2 pp56.7%±5.1 pp10,604 ±1,227
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	66.6%±1.9 pp66.6%±1.9 pp37,298±1,050	79.1%±0.3 pp79.1%±0.3 pp2,144,343±7,926	▼ -12.5%▼ -12.5%	43/50
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	33.4%±2.4 pp33.4%±2.4 pp18,699±1,344	20.9%±0.3 pp20.9%±0.3 pp566,883±7,968	▲ +12.5%▲ +12.5%	8/50
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	14.5%±1.3 pp43.3%±2.5 pp8,095±743	10.0%±0.2 pp47.7%±0.5 pp270,551±4,603	▲ +4.5%▼ -4.4%	17/5031/50
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	18.9%±2.2 pp56.7%±5.1 pp10,604±1,227	10.9%±0.2 pp52.3%±0.9 pp296,332±6,504	▲ +8.0%▲ +4.4%	6/5020/50
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show

Category	Ward 33
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents)	11.5%±1.5 pp34.6%±3.6 pp6,567±857
Born in Philippines (of foreign-born residents)	3.8%±1.1 pp11.4%±3.3 pp2,169±644
Born in Guatemala (of foreign-born residents)	2.1%±0.7 pp6.3%±2.0 pp1,191±395
Born in Ecuador (of foreign-born residents)	2.1%±0.7 pp6.2%±2.1 pp1,177±408
Born in India (of foreign-born residents)	1.5%±0.6 pp4.5%±1.7 pp850±325
Born in Venezuela (of foreign-born residents)	1.2%±1.0 pp3.5%±2.9 pp670±550
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	9.8%29.3%5,574
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	Chicago	Difference	Rank
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents)	11.5% ±1.5 pp34.6%±3.6 pp6,567	8.2% ±0.2 pp39.3%222,978	▲ +3.3%▼ -4.8%	15/5021/50
Born in Philippines (of foreign-born residents)	3.8% ±1.1 pp11.4%±3.3 pp2,169	0.8% ±0.1 pp3.8%21,740	▲ +3.0%▲ +7.6%	2/502/50
Born in Guatemala (of foreign-born residents)	2.1% ±0.7 pp6.3%±2.0 pp1,191	0.4% ±0.0 pp1.9%11,016	▲ +1.7%▲ +4.3%	2/501/50
Born in Ecuador (of foreign-born residents)	2.1% ±0.7 pp6.2%±2.1 pp1,177	0.5% ±0.1 pp2.5%14,043	▲ +1.5%▲ +3.7%	3/507/50
Born in India (of foreign-born residents)	1.5% ±0.6 pp4.5%±1.7 pp850	1.0% ±0.1 pp5.0%28,235	▲ +0.5%▼ -0.5%	11/5021/50
Born in Venezuela (of foreign-born residents)	1.2% ±1.0 pp3.5%±2.9 pp670	0.3% ±0.1 pp1.6%9,222	▲ +0.8%▲ +1.9%	2/509/50
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	9.8%29.3%5,574	——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show

Category	Ward 33
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	10.9% ±1.9 pp32.5%±5.3 pp6,176 ±1,098
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	7.2% ±1.0 pp21.6%±2.8 pp4,106 ±595
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	6.9% ±0.9 pp20.7%±2.2 pp3,926 ±495
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	8.4% ±0.9 pp25.2%±2.2 pp4,798 ±524
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	10.9%±1.9 pp32.5%±5.3 pp6,176±1,098	5.9%±0.2 pp838.9%±64.4 pp159,447±5,557	▲ +5.0%▼ -806.4%	6/5022/50
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	7.2%±1.0 pp21.6%±2.8 pp4,106±595	4.5%±0.1 pp641.4%±48.8 pp121,912±4,035	▲ +2.7%▼ -619.8%	8/5023/50
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	6.9%±0.9 pp20.7%±2.2 pp3,926±495	4.6%±0.1 pp651.6%±49.1 pp123,849±3,901	▲ +2.3%▼ -630.9%	11/5026/50
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	8.4%±0.9 pp25.2%±2.2 pp4,798±524	6.0%±0.1 pp850.6%±61.0 pp161,675±3,491	▲ +2.5%▼ -825.4%	14/5028/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later	2.4% ±0.6 pp1,527 ±395	6.9% ±1.0 pp4,134 ±590	10.9% ±1.9 pp6,176 ±1,098	▲ +8.4 pp▲ +4,649▲ +4.0 pp▲ +2,042▲ +4.5 pp▲ +2,607
Chicago citywide	1.4% ±0.1 pp36,978 ±2,235	3.7% ±0.1 pp99,118 ±3,198	5.9% ±0.2 pp159,447 ±5,568	▲ +4.5 pp▲ +122,469▲ +2.2 pp▲ +60,329▲ +2.3 pp▲ +62,140
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009	13.9% ±1.8 pp8,832 ±1,116	9.2% ±1.1 pp5,499 ±640	7.2% ±1.0 pp4,106 ±595	▼ −6.7 pp▼ −4,726▼ −1.9 pp▼ −1,393▼ −4.8 pp▼ −3,333
Chicago citywide	5.9% ±0.1 pp161,331 ±3,896	4.9% ±0.1 pp131,658 ±3,182	4.5% ±0.1 pp121,912 ±4,044	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −39,419▼ −0.4 pp▼ −9,746▼ −1.1 pp▼ −29,673
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999	12.2% ±1.4 pp7,752 ±866	9.6% ±1.0 pp5,763 ±593	6.9% ±0.9 pp3,926 ±495	▼ −5.3 pp▼ −3,826▼ −2.7 pp▼ −1,837▼ −2.6 pp▼ −1,989
Chicago citywide	6.1% ±0.1 pp165,077 ±3,717	5.3% ±0.1 pp142,413 ±3,015	4.6% ±0.1 pp123,849 ±3,911	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −41,228▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,564▼ −0.8 pp▼ −22,664
Entered the U.S. Before 1990	12.1% ±1.1 pp7,639 ±698	10.6% ±0.8 pp6,374 ±510	8.4% ±0.9 pp4,798 ±524	▼ −3.6 pp▼ −2,841▼ −2.2 pp▼ −1,576▼ −1.5 pp▼ −1,265
Chicago citywide	7.5% ±0.1 pp204,169 ±3,469	6.9% ±0.1 pp186,050 ±3,114	6.0% ±0.1 pp161,675 ±3,509	▼ −1.6 pp▼ −42,494▼ −0.9 pp▼ −24,375▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,119

Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category	Ward 33
Average Household Income	$116,793±$5,819
Per Capita Income	$46,543±$2,013
10th Percentile Household Income	$25,120±$2,056
25th Percentile Household Income	$45,166±$3,155
Median Household Income	$87,928±$4,788
75th Percentile Household Income	$153,322±$9,321
90th Percentile Household Income	Over $200,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$116,793±$5,819	$116,016±$1,263	▲ +$777	17/50
Per Capita Income	$46,543±$2,013	$50,086±$581	▼ −$3,544	22/50
10th Percentile Household Income	$25,120±$2,056	$12,933±$271	▲ +$12,186	8/50
25th Percentile Household Income	$45,166±$3,155	$34,575±$649	▲ +$10,591	14/50
Median Household Income	$87,928±$4,788	$77,902±$907	▲ +$10,026	17/50
75th Percentile Household Income	$153,322±$9,321	$144,150±$1,210	▲ +$9,172	17/50
90th Percentile Household Income	Over $200,000	Over $200,000	—	1/50
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$85,496 ±2,926	$101,899 ±3,689	$116,793 ±5,819	▲ +$31,296▲ +$14,894▲ +$16,403
Chicago citywide	$95,689 ±910	$111,304 ±1,075	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$20,327▲ +$4,712▲ +$15,615
Average Household Income (nominal dollars)	$64,523 ±2,208	$83,048 ±3,007	$116,793 ±5,819	▲ +$52,270▲ +$33,745▲ +$18,525
Chicago citywide	$72,215 ±687	$90,713 ±876	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$43,801▲ +$25,303▲ +$18,498
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$29,765 ±598	$37,051 ±1,109	$46,543 ±2,013	▲ +$16,778▲ +$9,491▲ +$7,286
Chicago citywide	$37,927 ±351	$45,525 ±412	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$12,160▲ +$4,562▲ +$7,598
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars)	$22,463 ±451	$30,197 ±904	$46,543 ±2,013	▲ +$24,080▲ +$16,346▲ +$7,734
Chicago citywide	$28,623 ±265	$37,103 ±336	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$21,464▲ +$12,984▲ +$8,480
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$15,730 ±1,711	$20,581 ±2,110	$25,120 ±2,056	▲ +$9,389▲ +$4,538▲ +$4,851
Chicago citywide	$11,828 ±190	$13,281 ±277	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$1,105▼ −$348▲ +$1,453
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$11,871 ±1,291	$16,774 ±1,720	$25,120 ±2,056	▲ +$13,248▲ +$8,346▲ +$4,902
Chicago citywide	$8,927 ±144	$10,824 ±225	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$4,007▲ +$2,109▲ +$1,898
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$32,731 ±1,993	$41,365 ±2,626	$45,166 ±3,155	▲ +$12,435▲ +$3,801▲ +$8,634
Chicago citywide	$28,727 ±321	$31,597 ±462	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$5,848▲ +$2,979▲ +$2,869
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$24,701 ±1,504	$33,712 ±2,140	$45,166 ±3,155	▲ +$20,465▲ +$11,454▲ +$9,011
Chicago citywide	$21,680 ±242	$25,751 ±376	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$12,895▲ +$8,824▲ +$4,071
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$65,466 ±3,084	$76,109 ±3,501	$87,928 ±4,788	▲ +$22,462▲ +$11,819▲ +$10,642
Chicago citywide	$63,379 ±591	$71,469 ±723	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$14,523▲ +$6,433▲ +$8,090
Median Household Income (nominal dollars)	$49,406 ±2,327	$62,029 ±2,853	$87,928 ±4,788	▲ +$38,522▲ +$25,899▲ +$12,622
Chicago citywide	$47,831 ±446	$58,247 ±589	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$30,071▲ +$19,655▲ +$10,416
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$115,858 ±5,142	$132,153 ±6,061	$153,322 ±9,321	▲ +$37,464▲ +$21,169▲ +$16,295
Chicago citywide	$122,019 ±806	$139,501 ±1,057	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$22,131▲ +$4,648▲ +$17,482
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$87,436 ±3,881	$107,705 ±4,940	$153,322 ±9,321	▲ +$65,886▲ +$45,617▲ +$20,269
Chicago citywide	$92,086 ±608	$113,694 ±862	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$52,064▲ +$30,456▲ +$21,608
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$178,601 ±10,106	$215,809 ±8,762	—	——▲ +$37,208
Chicago citywide	$202,601 ±2,442	$235,390 ±1,636	—	——▲ +$32,790
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$134,787 ±7,627	$175,884 ±7,141	—	——▲ +$41,097
Chicago citywide	$152,899 ±1,843	$191,844 ±1,333	—	——▲ +$38,944

Poverty Status

Category	Ward 33
Below Poverty Line	11.4% ±2.0 pp6,384 ±1,095
Below 200% Poverty Line	30.8% ±3.0 pp17,267 ±1,663
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	4.0% ±0.9 pp2,260 ±485
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Below Poverty Line	11.4%±2.0 pp6,384±1,095	16.8%±0.4 pp456,194±11,330	▼ -5.4%	35/50
Below 200% Poverty Line	30.8%±3.0 pp17,267±1,663	33.4%±0.6 pp905,794±16,660	▼ -2.6%	32/50
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	4.0%±0.9 pp2,260±485	8.3%±0.3 pp226,117±7,649	▼ -4.3%	47/50
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Category	Ward 33
Food Insecurity	21.8%9,393
Housing Insecurity	17.7%7,620
Transportation Barriers	10.1%4,346
Threatened Utility Shutoff	9.3%4,010
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Food Insecurity	21.8%9,393	24.4%509,385	▼ -2.6%	30/50
Housing Insecurity	17.7%7,620	19.7%411,266	▼ -2.0%	31/50
Transportation Barriers	10.1%4,346	11.6%242,167	▼ -1.5%	30/50
Threatened Utility Shutoff	9.3%4,010	11.9%248,430	▼ -2.6%	30/50
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category	Ward 33
In Labor Force	90.1% ±1.7 pp25,661 ±479
↳ Employed	85.1% ±1.8 pp24,251 ±502
↳ Unemployed	4.9% ±1.3 pp1,410 ±371
↳ Unemployment Rate	5.5% ±1.4 pp—
Not in Labor Force	9.9% ±6.3 pp2,834 ±1,790
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
In Labor Force	90.1%±1.7 pp25,661±479	85.6%±0.3 pp1,069,076±3,571	▲ +4.5%	13/50
↳ Employed	85.1%±1.8 pp24,251±502	79.6%±0.3 pp994,466±4,015	▲ +5.5%	13/50
↳ Unemployed	4.9%±1.3 pp1,410±371	5.9%±0.2 pp73,968±2,565	▼ -1.0%	30/50
↳ Unemployment Rate	5.5%±1.4 pp—	6.9%±0.2 pp86,502±3,074	▼ -1.4%	31/50
Not in Labor Force	9.9%±6.3 pp2,834±1,790	14.4%±1.1 pp180,399±13,145	▼ -4.5%	38/50
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category	Ward 33
Management, Business, Science & Arts	43.0% ±2.8 pp14,239 ±920
↳ Management Occupations	10.5% ±1.2 pp3,472 ±411
↳ Business & Financial Operations	7.6% ±1.3 pp2,528 ±415
↳ Computer & Mathematical	3.5% ±0.8 pp1,159 ±259
↳ Architecture & Engineering	1.9% ±0.6 pp619 ±210
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	0.7% ±0.4 pp234 ±123
↳ Community & Social Service	1.4% ±0.5 pp469 ±161
↳ Legal Occupations	1.4% ±0.6 pp479 ±191
↳ Education, Training & Library	7.0% ±1.2 pp2,322 ±406
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	3.3% ±0.7 pp1,085 ±216
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	4.3% ±1.0 pp1,437 ±344
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	1.3% ±0.7 pp435 ±218
Service	22.7% ±2.5 pp7,507 ±840
↳ Healthcare Support	3.1% ±0.9 pp1,031 ±286
↳ Protective Service	1.6% ±0.5 pp536 ±176
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	10.4% ±1.8 pp3,433 ±600
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	4.4% ±1.3 pp1,459 ±424
↳ Personal Care & Service	3.2% ±0.9 pp1,047 ±308
Sales & Office	17.9% ±1.9 pp5,920 ±641
↳ Sales & Related	9.2% ±1.5 pp3,053 ±481
↳ Office & Administrative Support	8.7% ±1.2 pp2,866 ±413
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	5.3% ±1.4 pp1,745 ±469
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.0% ±0.3 pp1 ±91
↳ Construction & Extraction	3.7% ±1.3 pp1,216 ±428
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	1.6% ±0.6 pp528 ±197
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	11.2% ±1.6 pp3,712 ±523
↳ Production Occupations	4.7% ±1.1 pp1,555 ±357
↳ Transportation Occupations	2.8% ±0.7 pp914 ±243
↳ Material Moving Occupations	3.8% ±0.9 pp1,243 ±286
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts	43.0%±2.8 pp14,239±920	49.2%±0.4 pp686,743±5,710	▼ -6.2%	27/50
↳ Management Occupations	10.5%±1.2 pp3,472±411	12.3%±0.3 pp172,182±3,807	▼ -1.9%	25/50
↳ Business & Financial Operations	7.6%±1.3 pp2,528±415	9.1%±0.2 pp127,081±3,358	▼ -1.5%	18/50
↳ Computer & Mathematical	3.5%±0.8 pp1,159±259	4.9%±0.2 pp68,921±2,690	▼ -1.4%	29/50
↳ Architecture & Engineering	1.9%±0.6 pp619±210	1.6%±0.1 pp22,779±1,380	▲ +0.2%	17/50
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	0.7%±0.4 pp234±123	1.4%±0.1 pp19,126±1,340	▼ -0.7%	33/50
↳ Community & Social Service	1.4%±0.5 pp469±161	1.9%±0.1 pp26,973±1,500	▼ -0.5%	40/50
↳ Legal Occupations	1.4%±0.6 pp479±191	2.3%±0.1 pp31,629±1,814	▼ -0.8%	26/50
↳ Education, Training & Library	7.0%±1.2 pp2,322±406	6.6%±0.2 pp92,316±2,697	▲ +0.4%	20/50
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	3.3%±0.7 pp1,085±216	3.1%±0.1 pp43,879±1,786	▲ +0.1%	17/50
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	4.3%±1.0 pp1,437±344	4.6%±0.2 pp63,551±2,652	▼ -0.2%	19/50
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	1.3%±0.7 pp435±218	1.3%±0.1 pp18,306±1,387	0%	26/50
Service	22.7%±2.5 pp7,507±840	16.9%±0.3 pp235,977±4,217	▲ +5.8%	16/50
↳ Healthcare Support	3.1%±0.9 pp1,031±286	3.4%±0.2 pp46,792±2,107	▼ -0.2%	28/50
↳ Protective Service	1.6%±0.5 pp536±176	2.8%±0.1 pp39,146±1,734	▼ -1.2%	33/50
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	10.4%±1.8 pp3,433±600	5.1%±0.2 pp70,514±2,393	▲ +5.3%	2/50
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	4.4%±1.3 pp1,459±424	3.0%±0.1 pp41,783±1,967	▲ +1.4%	17/50
↳ Personal Care & Service	3.2%±0.9 pp1,047±308	2.7%±0.1 pp37,742±1,657	▲ +0.5%	15/50
Sales & Office	17.9%±1.9 pp5,920±641	17.4%±0.3 pp243,580±4,754	▲ +0.4%	23/50
↳ Sales & Related	9.2%±1.5 pp3,053±481	8.1%±0.2 pp113,073±3,174	▲ +1.1%	7/50
↳ Office & Administrative Support	8.7%±1.2 pp2,866±413	9.3%±0.3 pp130,507±3,591	▼ -0.7%	35/50
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	5.3%±1.4 pp1,745±469	4.6%±0.2 pp64,338±2,929	▲ +0.7%	23/50
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.0%±0.3 pp1±91	0.1%±0.0 pp1,506±406	▼ -0.1%	42/50
↳ Construction & Extraction	3.7%±1.3 pp1,216±428	2.8%±0.1 pp39,432±2,062	▲ +0.8%	19/50
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	1.6%±0.6 pp528±197	1.7%±0.1 pp23,400±1,722	▼ -0.1%	28/50
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	11.2%±1.6 pp3,712±523	11.8%±0.3 pp165,261±3,629	▼ -0.6%	32/50
↳ Production Occupations	4.7%±1.1 pp1,555±357	4.2%±0.2 pp57,989±2,275	▲ +0.5%	24/50
↳ Transportation Occupations	2.8%±0.7 pp914±243	3.9%±0.2 pp54,099±2,118	▼ -1.1%	39/50
↳ Material Moving Occupations	3.8%±0.9 pp1,243±286	3.8%±0.2 pp53,173±2,312	▼ -0.1%	28/50
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category	Ward 33
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.2% ±0.4 pp76 ±116
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	0.2% ±0.4 pp68 ±116
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0% ±0.3 pp8 ±92
Construction	4.5% ±1.4 pp1,498 ±470
Manufacturing	7.4% ±1.1 pp2,461 ±367
Wholesale Trade	2.1% ±0.7 pp708 ±243
Retail Trade	10.6% ±1.5 pp3,517 ±487
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	5.1% ±1.0 pp1,676 ±324
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	4.5% ±0.9 pp1,485 ±287
↳ Utilities	0.6% ±0.5 pp191 ±175
Information	1.6% ±0.5 pp520 ±163
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	7.4% ±1.2 pp2,450 ±398
↳ Finance & Insurance	5.0% ±1.0 pp1,665 ±331
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	2.4% ±0.7 pp785 ±246
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	14.8% ±1.5 pp4,914 ±500
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	10.4% ±1.2 pp3,456 ±399
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.2% ±0.3 pp62 ±99
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	4.2% ±1.0 pp1,397 ±334
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	23.9% ±2.0 pp7,925 ±647
↳ Educational Services	10.8% ±1.2 pp3,563 ±410
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	13.2% ±1.8 pp4,362 ±596
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	15.6% ±1.9 pp5,172 ±645
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	2.2% ±0.7 pp731 ±218
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	13.4% ±1.8 pp4,441 ±607
Other Services	4.7% ±0.7 pp1,543 ±246
Public Administration	2.0% ±0.6 pp662 ±188
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.2%±0.4 pp76±116	0.2%±0.0 pp—	0%	20/50
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	0.2%±0.4 pp68±116	0.2%±0.0 pp—	0%	19/50
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%±0.3 pp8±92	0.0%±0.0 pp—	0%	15/50
Construction	4.5%±1.4 pp1,498±470	3.8%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.8%	18/50
Manufacturing	7.4%±1.1 pp2,461±367	7.7%±0.2 pp—	▼ -0.3%	25/50
Wholesale Trade	2.1%±0.7 pp708±243	2.0%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.1%	19/50
Retail Trade	10.6%±1.5 pp3,517±487	8.2%±0.2 pp—	▲ +2.4%	7/50
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	5.1%±1.0 pp1,676±324	7.1%±0.2 pp—	▼ -2.0%	40/50
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	4.5%±0.9 pp1,485±287	6.5%±0.2 pp—	▼ -2.1%	38/50
↳ Utilities	0.6%±0.5 pp191±175	0.5%±0.1 pp—	0%	22/50
Information	1.6%±0.5 pp520±163	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.6%	31/50
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	7.4%±1.2 pp2,450±398	8.8%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.4%	24/50
↳ Finance & Insurance	5.0%±1.0 pp1,665±331	6.7%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.7%	25/50
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	2.4%±0.7 pp785±246	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.2%	16/50
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	14.8%±1.5 pp4,914±500	18.2%±0.4 pp—	▼ -3.4%	21/50
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	10.4%±1.2 pp3,456±399	13.4%±0.3 pp—	▼ -3.0%	22/50
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.2%±0.3 pp62±99	0.1%±0.0 pp—	▲ +0.1%	13/50
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	4.2%±1.0 pp1,397±334	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▼ -0.4%	31/50
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	23.9%±2.0 pp7,925±647	24.2%±0.4 pp—	▼ -0.2%	24/50
↳ Educational Services	10.8%±1.2 pp3,563±410	10.5%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.3%	21/50
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	13.2%±1.8 pp4,362±596	13.7%±0.3 pp—	▼ -0.5%	24/50
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	15.6%±1.9 pp5,172±645	9.1%±0.2 pp—	▲ +6.5%	2/50
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	2.2%±0.7 pp731±218	2.2%±0.1 pp—	0%	22/50
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	13.4%±1.8 pp4,441±607	6.9%±0.2 pp—	▲ +6.5%	3/50
Other Services	4.7%±0.7 pp1,543±246	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.1%	24/50
Public Administration	2.0%±0.6 pp662±188	4.0%±0.2 pp—	▼ -2.0%	45/50
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category	Ward 33
Private Company Employee	70.0% ±1.9 pp23,177 ±633
Self-Employed	9.3% ±1.6 pp3,073 ±514
Nonprofit	11.4% ±1.2 pp3,767 ±383
Government	9.2% ±1.2 pp3,038 ±393
Unpaid Family Worker	0.2% ±0.3 pp66 ±114
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Private Company Employee	70.0%±1.9 pp23,177±633	67.9%±0.4 pp947,845±5,822	▲ +2.1%	16/50
Self-Employed	9.3%±1.6 pp3,073±514	8.3%±0.2 pp115,690±2,989	▲ +1.0%	10/50
Nonprofit	11.4%±1.2 pp3,767±383	12.1%±0.3 pp169,124±4,035	▼ -0.7%	24/50
Government	9.2%±1.2 pp3,038±393	12.9%±0.3 pp179,945±4,021	▼ -3.7%	37/50
Unpaid Family Worker	0.2%±0.3 pp66±114	0.2%±0.0 pp2,312±408	0%	16/50
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category	Ward 33
Full-Time, Year-Round	66.8% ±1.5 pp24,015 ±529
Part-Time or Part-Year	33.2% ±2.5 pp11,916 ±905
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round	66.8%±1.5 pp24,015±529	67.0%±0.3 pp1,025,726±3,875	▼ -0.2%	22/50
Part-Time or Part-Year	33.2%±2.5 pp11,916±905	33.0%±0.3 pp504,210±4,897	▲ +0.2%	29/50
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category	Ward 33
Average FT Earnings	$84,756±$3,909
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$28,542±$1,403
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$39,769±$1,721
Median FT Earnings	$64,602±$3,019
75th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000
90th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Average FT Earnings	$84,756±$3,909	$96,214±$968	▼ −$11,458	23/50
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$28,542±$1,403	$29,008±$387	▼ −$466	24/50
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$39,769±$1,721	$43,011±$345	▼ −$3,242	27/50
Median FT Earnings	$64,602±$3,019	$69,663±$530	▼ −$5,060	22/50
75th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000	Over $100,000	—	1/50
90th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000	Over $100,000	—	1/50
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$63,621 ±1,158	$71,445 ±1,782	$84,756 ±3,909	▲ +$21,135▲ +$13,311▲ +$7,824
Chicago citywide	$83,170 ±714	$91,467 ±682	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$13,044▲ +$4,747▲ +$8,297
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$48,014 ±874	$58,228 ±1,452	$84,756 ±3,909	▲ +$36,742▲ +$26,528▲ +$10,214
Chicago citywide	$62,767 ±539	$74,546 ±556	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$33,447▲ +$21,669▲ +$11,778
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$22,178 ±920	$23,847 ±992	$28,542 ±1,403	▲ +$6,364▲ +$4,695▲ +$1,669
Chicago citywide	$24,209 ±243	$26,113 ±152	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$4,799▲ +$2,895▲ +$1,904
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$16,737 ±695	$19,435 ±808	$28,542 ±1,403	▲ +$11,805▲ +$9,107▲ +$2,698
Chicago citywide	$18,270 ±183	$21,282 ±124	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$10,738▲ +$7,726▲ +$3,012
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$30,584 ±1,302	$34,395 ±1,172	$39,769 ±1,721	▲ +$9,185▲ +$5,375▲ +$3,810
Chicago citywide	$37,393 ±278	$39,415 ±229	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$5,618▲ +$3,597▲ +$2,021
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$23,082 ±983	$28,032 ±956	$39,769 ±1,721	▲ +$16,688▲ +$11,738▲ +$4,950
Chicago citywide	$28,220 ±210	$32,123 ±187	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$14,791▲ +$10,888▲ +$3,903
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$48,593 ±2,069	$54,617 ±2,456	$64,602 ±3,019	▲ +$16,009▲ +$9,985▲ +$6,024
Chicago citywide	$60,575 ±496	$64,628 ±327	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,034▲ +$4,054
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$36,673 ±1,561	$44,513 ±2,002	$64,602 ±3,019	▲ +$27,930▲ +$20,089▲ +$7,841
Chicago citywide	$45,715 ±374	$52,672 ±266	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$23,948▲ +$16,991▲ +$6,957
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$80,794 ±3,580	$91,343 ±3,602	—	——▲ +$10,549
Chicago citywide	$98,274 ±615	$108,202 ±616	—	——▲ +$9,928
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$60,974 ±2,702	$74,444 ±2,936	—	——▲ +$13,471
Chicago citywide	$74,166 ±464	$88,185 ±502	—	——▲ +$14,019
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$123,413 ±3,829	—	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$93,138 ±2,890	—	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category	Ward 33
Average PT Earnings	$30,319±$2,803
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$3,150±$855
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$10,507±$1,712
Median PT Earnings	$20,359±$1,481
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$32,884±$3,033
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$68,026±$9,822
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Average PT Earnings	$30,319±$2,803	$33,575±$750	▼ −$3,256	23/50
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$3,150±$855	$2,183±$87	▲ +$966	11/50
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$10,507±$1,712	$7,222±$206	▲ +$3,286	7/50
Median PT Earnings	$20,359±$1,481	$19,180±$393	▲ +$1,179	17/50
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$32,884±$3,033	$38,498±$681	▼ −$5,614	29/50
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$68,026±$9,822	$73,776±$1,391	▼ −$5,750	22/50
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$23,086 ±1,392	$26,619 ±1,389	$30,319 ±2,803	▲ +$7,233▲ +$3,700▲ +$3,532
Chicago citywide	$27,076 ±473	$31,236 ±676	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$6,500▲ +$2,340▲ +$4,160
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$17,423 ±1,051	$21,694 ±1,132	$30,319 ±2,803	▲ +$12,896▲ +$8,625▲ +$4,271
Chicago citywide	$20,433 ±357	$25,457 ±551	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$13,142▲ +$8,118▲ +$5,024
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,951 ±549	$2,944 ±484	$3,150 ±855	▲ +$199▲ +$206▼ −$7
Chicago citywide	$2,230 ±48	$2,283 ±59	$2,183 ±87	▼ −$47▼ −$100▲ +$53
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$2,227 ±414	$2,400 ±394	$3,150 ±855	▲ +$923▲ +$750▲ +$172
Chicago citywide	$1,683 ±36	$1,861 ±48	$2,183 ±87	▲ +$500▲ +$322▲ +$178
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$7,409 ±931	$9,013 ±1,095	$10,507 ±1,712	▲ +$3,098▲ +$1,494▲ +$1,605
Chicago citywide	$6,390 ±123	$6,841 ±156	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$832▲ +$381▲ +$451
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$5,591 ±702	$7,346 ±892	$10,507 ±1,712	▲ +$4,916▲ +$3,161▲ +$1,755
Chicago citywide	$4,822 ±93	$5,575 ±127	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$2,399▲ +$1,646▲ +$753
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$16,260 ±1,005	$19,310 ±1,031	$20,359 ±1,481	▲ +$4,099▲ +$1,048▲ +$3,051
Chicago citywide	$15,461 ±166	$17,025 ±275	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$3,719▲ +$2,155▲ +$1,563
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$12,271 ±758	$15,738 ±841	$20,359 ±1,481	▲ +$8,088▲ +$4,621▲ +$3,467
Chicago citywide	$11,668 ±125	$13,875 ±224	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$7,512▲ +$5,305▲ +$2,207
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$29,348 ±1,963	$33,724 ±1,624	$32,884 ±3,033	▲ +$3,536▼ −$840▲ +$4,376
Chicago citywide	$30,795 ±619	$34,779 ±505	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$7,703▲ +$3,719▲ +$3,984
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$22,148 ±1,482	$27,485 ±1,323	$32,884 ±3,033	▲ +$10,735▲ +$5,399▲ +$5,337
Chicago citywide	$23,241 ±468	$28,345 ±412	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$15,257▲ +$10,153▲ +$5,104
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$49,349 ±4,163	$59,194 ±7,397	$68,026 ±9,822	▲ +$18,677▲ +$8,832▲ +$9,845
Chicago citywide	$61,207 ±1,249	$68,040 ±1,298	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$12,570▲ +$5,737▲ +$6,833
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$37,243 ±3,142	$48,243 ±6,028	$68,026 ±9,822	▲ +$30,783▲ +$19,783▲ +$11,000
Chicago citywide	$46,192 ±942	$55,452 ±1,058	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$27,585▲ +$18,324▲ +$9,261

Earnings of All Workers

Category	Ward 33
Average Earnings	$67,391±$1,969
10th Percentile Earnings	$11,840±$1,387
25th Percentile Earnings	$25,261±$1,460
Median Earnings	$46,442±$2,732
75th Percentile Earnings	$86,461±$3,636
90th Percentile Earnings	Over $100,000
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Average Earnings	$67,391±$1,969	$75,571±$768	▼ −$8,180	22/50
10th Percentile Earnings	$11,840±$1,387	$8,529±$272	▲ +$3,311	8/50
25th Percentile Earnings	$25,261±$1,460	$25,183±$358	▲ +$78	22/50
Median Earnings	$46,442±$2,732	$51,367±$471	▼ −$4,925	24/50
75th Percentile Earnings	$86,461±$3,636	$93,324±$598	▼ −$6,862	22/50
90th Percentile Earnings	Over $100,000	Over $100,000	—	1/50
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$48,652 ±557	$57,046 ±689	$67,391 ±1,969	▲ +$18,739▲ +$10,345▲ +$8,394
Chicago citywide	$62,453 ±534	$71,626 ±551	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$13,118▲ +$3,945▲ +$9,173
Average Earnings (nominal dollars)	$36,717 ±420	$46,493 ±562	$67,391 ±1,969	▲ +$30,674▲ +$20,898▲ +$9,776
Chicago citywide	$47,133 ±403	$58,375 ±449	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$28,438▲ +$17,196▲ +$11,243
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$7,737 ±983	$11,007 ±1,322	$11,840 ±1,387	▲ +$4,103▲ +$833▲ +$3,271
Chicago citywide	$6,858 ±139	$8,358 ±164	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$1,671▲ +$171▲ +$1,500
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$5,839 ±742	$8,971 ±1,077	$11,840 ±1,387	▲ +$6,001▲ +$2,869▲ +$3,132
Chicago citywide	$5,176 ±105	$6,812 ±134	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$3,354▲ +$1,717▲ +$1,636
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$19,014 ±1,258	$22,775 ±961	$25,261 ±1,460	▲ +$6,246▲ +$2,485▲ +$3,761
Chicago citywide	$19,598 ±241	$23,173 ±290	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$5,585▲ +$2,010▲ +$3,576
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$14,350 ±949	$18,562 ±783	$25,261 ±1,460	▲ +$10,911▲ +$6,699▲ +$4,212
Chicago citywide	$14,790 ±182	$18,886 ±236	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$10,393▲ +$6,297▲ +$4,096
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$34,925 ±1,574	$40,138 ±1,269	$46,442 ±2,732	▲ +$11,517▲ +$6,304▲ +$5,212
Chicago citywide	$42,365 ±293	$47,195 ±370	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$9,002▲ +$4,172▲ +$4,830
Median Earnings (nominal dollars)	$26,357 ±1,188	$32,712 ±1,034	$46,442 ±2,732	▲ +$20,085▲ +$13,730▲ +$6,355
Chicago citywide	$31,972 ±221	$38,464 ±302	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$19,395▲ +$12,903▲ +$6,492
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$63,350 ±3,214	$73,178 ±2,647	$86,461 ±3,636	▲ +$23,111▲ +$13,283▲ +$9,828
Chicago citywide	$78,784 ±555	$87,853 ±597	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$14,540▲ +$5,471▲ +$9,069
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$47,809 ±2,425	$59,640 ±2,157	$86,461 ±3,636	▲ +$38,652▲ +$26,821▲ +$11,831
Chicago citywide	$59,457 ±418	$71,600 ±486	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$33,867▲ +$21,723▲ +$12,144
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$102,885 ±4,804	$118,540 ±3,044	—	——▲ +$15,655
Chicago citywide	$128,659 ±682	—	—	———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$77,646 ±3,626	$96,610 ±2,481	—	——▲ +$18,964
Chicago citywide	$97,097 ±515	—	—	———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 33

Category	Ward 33
Household income at age 35	$51,008 ±$747
Household income percentile rank	46.8 ±0.48 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	15.3% ±0.63 pp
Individual income at age 35	$37,449 ±$562
Fraction married	38.5% ±0.85 pp
Employment rate	74.8% ±0.76 pp
Incarceration rate	1.08% ±0.21 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 33. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 33 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$51,008 ±$747	$43,090 ±$102	+$7,919
Household income percentile rank	46.8 ±0.48 pp	40.9 ±0.06 pp	+5.9 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	15.3% ±0.63 pp	11.4% ±0.08 pp	+3.9 pp
Individual income at age 35	$37,449 ±$562	$33,544 ±$80	+$3,905
Fraction married	38.5% ±0.85 pp	26.4% ±0.11 pp	+12.2 pp
Employment rate	74.8% ±0.76 pp	74.4% ±0.11 pp	+0.4 pp
Incarceration rate	1.08% ±0.21 pp	2.87% ±0.05 pp	−1.8 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 33. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 33 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 33 in Lower-Income Families

Category	Ward 33
Household income at age 35	$45,235 ±$982
Household income percentile rank	42.9 ±0.67 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	11.6% ±0.86 pp
Individual income at age 35	$33,999 ±$778
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 33 with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 33 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$45,235 ±$982	$34,711 ±$124	+$10,524
Household income percentile rank	42.9 ±0.67 pp	35.3 ±0.09 pp	+7.6 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	11.6% ±0.86 pp	6.31% ±0.09 pp	+5.3 pp
Individual income at age 35	$33,999 ±$778	$28,716 ±$106	+$5,282
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 33 with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 33 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Ward 33

Category	Ward 33
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	81.5% ±0.69 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	22.3% ±0.75 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 33. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 33 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	81.5% ±0.69 pp	78.1% ±0.11 pp	+3.4 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	22.3% ±0.75 pp	22.9% ±0.11 pp	−0.5 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 33. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 33 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Ward 33

Category	Ward 33
All jobs located in ward 33	8,280
Ward 33 jobs held by Ward 33 residents	6.9%
Ward 33 jobs held by non-Ward 33 residents	93.1%
Employed residents working in Ward 33	2.2%
Employed residents working outside Ward 33	97.8%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 33	Chicago ward median	Difference	Rank
All jobs located in ward 33	8,280	11,093	▼ −2,813	35/50
Ward 33 jobs held by Ward 33 residents	6.9%	6.3%	▲ +0.6 pp	21/50
Ward 33 jobs held by non-Ward 33 residents	93.1%	93.7%	▼ −0.6 pp	30/50
Employed residents working in Ward 33	2.2%	3.2%	▼ −1.0 pp	38/50
Employed residents working outside Ward 33	97.8%	96.8%	▲ +1.0 pp	13/50
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in ward 33	8,100	8,728	8,280	▲ +180▼ −448▲ +628
Chicago citywide	10,920	11,554	11,093	▲ +174▼ −460▲ +634
Ward 33 jobs held by Ward 33 residents	6.8%496	6.8%531	6.9%501	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5– 0.0 pp▼ −30– 0.0 pp▲ +35
Chicago citywide	6.4%696	6.4%725	6.3%701	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5▼ −0.1 pp▼ −24– 0.0 pp▲ +29
Ward 33 jobs held by non-Ward 33 residents	93.2%6,807	93.2%7,243	93.1%6,792	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −15– 0.0 pp▼ −451– 0.0 pp▲ +436
Chicago citywide	93.6%9,244	93.6%9,497	93.7%9,122	▲ +0.1 pp▼ −122▲ +0.1 pp▼ −375– 0.0 pp▲ +253
Employed residents working in Ward 33	2.2%496	2.3%531	2.2%501	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5▼ −0.1 pp▼ −30▲ +0.1 pp▲ +35
Chicago citywide	3.3%696	3.0%725	3.2%701	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5▲ +0.1 pp▼ −24▼ −0.2 pp▲ +29
Employed residents working outside Ward 33	97.8%21,562	97.7%22,543	97.8%22,536	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +974▲ +0.1 pp▼ −7▼ −0.1 pp▲ +981
Chicago citywide	96.7%19,233	97.0%20,782	96.8%20,998	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,765▼ −0.1 pp▲ +216▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,549

Industry of Jobs in Ward 33

Category	Ward 33
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0
Construction	2.3%194
Manufacturing	4.8%397
Wholesale Trade	1.3%106
Retail Trade	15.7%1,299
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	13.0%1,077
↳ Utilities	12.3%1,021
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	0.7%56
Information	0.5%38
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	4.8%399
↳ Finance & Insurance	2.6%214
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	2.2%185
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	10.4%862
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	4.6%382
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%0
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	5.8%480
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	15.0%1,243
↳ Educational Services	1.3%108
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	13.7%1,135
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	26.3%2,175
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	15.9%1,317
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	10.4%858
Other Services	5.9%490
Public Administration	0.0%0
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0	0.0%423	0%	22/50
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0	0.0%36	0%	10/50
Construction	2.3%194	1.9%27,207	▲ +0.5%	24/50
Manufacturing	4.8%397	4.4%64,747	▲ +0.4%	31/50
Wholesale Trade	1.3%106	2.8%41,460	▼ -1.6%	36/50
Retail Trade	15.7%1,299	6.6%96,413	▲ +9.1%	18/50
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	13.0%1,077	6.0%87,845	▲ +7.0%	8/50
↳ Utilities	12.3%1,021	0.3%5,012	▲ +12.0%	1/50
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	0.7%56	5.7%82,833	▼ -5.0%	38/50
Information	0.5%38	3.5%51,095	▼ -3.0%	35/50
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	4.8%399	10.8%157,520	▼ -5.9%	17/50
↳ Finance & Insurance	2.6%214	8.6%125,824	▼ -6.0%	16/50
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	2.2%185	2.2%31,696	▲ +0.1%	18/50
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	10.4%862	23.2%339,220	▼ -12.8%	30/50
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	4.6%382	14.2%207,444	▼ -9.6%	24/50
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%0	1.2%16,872	▼ -1.2%	39/50
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	5.8%480	7.9%114,904	▼ -2.1%	25/50
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	15.0%1,243	23.0%336,089	▼ -8.0%	35/50
↳ Educational Services	1.3%108	9.2%134,671	▼ -7.9%	44/50
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	13.7%1,135	13.8%201,418	▼ -0.1%	30/50
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	26.3%2,175	10.3%151,055	▲ +15.9%	4/50
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	15.9%1,317	1.9%27,339	▲ +14.0%	1/50
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	10.4%858	8.5%123,716	▲ +1.9%	22/50
Other Services	5.9%490	4.0%59,136	▲ +1.9%	15/50
Public Administration	0.0%0	3.5%51,418	▼ -3.5%	22/50
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.0%181	0.0%569	0.0%423	– 0.0 pp▲ +242– 0.0 pp▼ −146– 0.0 pp▲ +388
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.0%140	0.0%374	0.0%36	– 0.0 pp▼ −104– 0.0 pp▼ −338– 0.0 pp▲ +234
Construction	1.7%139	2.6%229	2.3%194	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +55▼ −0.3 pp▼ −35▲ +0.9 pp▲ +90
Chicago citywide	1.6%20,789	1.8%26,012	1.9%27,207	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,418– 0.0 pp▲ +1,195▲ +0.3 pp▲ +5,223
Manufacturing	5.6%452	6.4%558	4.8%397	▼ −0.8 pp▼ −55▼ −1.6 pp▼ −161▲ +0.8 pp▲ +106
Chicago citywide	4.6%61,066	4.5%63,597	4.4%64,747	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,681▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,150▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,531
Wholesale Trade	2.4%197	2.0%178	1.3%106	▼ −1.2 pp▼ −91▼ −0.8 pp▼ −72▼ −0.4 pp▼ −19
Chicago citywide	3.0%39,431	2.9%41,789	2.8%41,460	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,029▼ −0.1 pp▼ −329▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,358
Retail Trade	18.5%1,496	13.2%1,151	15.7%1,299	▼ −2.8 pp▼ −197▲ +2.5 pp▲ +148▼ −5.3 pp▼ −345
Chicago citywide	7.4%97,262	6.9%97,836	6.6%96,413	▼ −0.8 pp▼ −849▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,423▼ −0.5 pp▲ +574
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	13.3%1,074	12.0%1,045	13.0%1,077	▼ −0.3 pp▲ +3▲ +1.0 pp▲ +32▼ −1.3 pp▼ −29
Chicago citywide	5.4%71,371	5.6%79,303	6.0%87,845	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +16,474▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,542▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,932
Utilities	12.4%1,004	11.3%986	12.3%1,021	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +17▲ +1.0 pp▲ +35▼ −1.1 pp▼ −18
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,383	0.3%4,956	0.3%5,012	– 0.0 pp▲ +629– 0.0 pp▲ +56– 0.0 pp▲ +573
Transportation & Warehousing	0.9%70	0.7%59	0.7%56	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −14– 0.0 pp▼ −3▼ −0.2 pp▼ −11
Chicago citywide	5.1%66,988	5.2%74,347	5.7%82,833	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +15,845▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,486▲ +0.1 pp▲ +7,359
Information	4.8%387	5.9%515	0.5%38	▼ −4.3 pp▼ −349▼ −5.4 pp▼ −477▲ +1.1 pp▲ +128
Chicago citywide	3.1%40,514	3.4%48,135	3.5%51,095	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +10,581▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,960▲ +0.3 pp▲ +7,621
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	7.9%637	4.9%426	4.8%399	▼ −3.0 pp▼ −238▼ −0.1 pp▼ −27▼ −3.0 pp▼ −211
Chicago citywide	10.5%138,287	10.6%150,163	10.8%157,520	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +19,233▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,357▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,876
Finance & Insurance	6.6%537	3.3%284	2.6%214	▼ −4.0 pp▼ −323▼ −0.7 pp▼ −70▼ −3.4 pp▼ −253
Chicago citywide	8.5%111,307	8.4%119,147	8.6%125,824	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14,517▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,677▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7,840
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.2%100	1.6%142	2.2%185	▲ +1.0 pp▲ +85▲ +0.6 pp▲ +43▲ +0.4 pp▲ +42
Chicago citywide	2.1%26,980	2.2%31,016	2.2%31,696	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,716– 0.0 pp▲ +680▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,036
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	7.0%569	10.2%886	10.4%862	▲ +3.4 pp▲ +293▲ +0.3 pp▼ −24▲ +3.1 pp▲ +317
Chicago citywide	21.2%278,928	22.6%319,744	23.2%339,220	▲ +2.0 pp▲ +60,292▲ +0.6 pp▲ +19,476▲ +1.3 pp▲ +40,816
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	3.6%291	3.5%306	4.6%382	▲ +1.0 pp▲ +91▲ +1.1 pp▲ +76▼ −0.1 pp▲ +15
Chicago citywide	11.8%155,200	12.9%182,462	14.2%207,444	▲ +2.4 pp▲ +52,244▲ +1.3 pp▲ +24,982▲ +1.1 pp▲ +27,262
Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%2	0.0%3	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp▼ −2– 0.0 pp▼ −3– 0.0 pp▲ +1
Chicago citywide	1.0%13,619	1.2%16,600	1.2%16,872	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,253– 0.0 pp▲ +272▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,981
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	3.4%276	6.6%577	5.8%480	▲ +2.4 pp▲ +204▼ −0.8 pp▼ −97▲ +3.2 pp▲ +301
Chicago citywide	8.4%110,109	8.5%120,682	7.9%114,904	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +4,795▼ −0.7 pp▼ −5,778▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,573
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	11.9%967	12.1%1,054	15.0%1,243	▲ +3.1 pp▲ +276▲ +2.9 pp▲ +189▲ +0.1 pp▲ +87
Chicago citywide	23.5%308,633	22.1%313,540	23.0%336,089	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +27,456▲ +0.8 pp▲ +22,549▼ −1.4 pp▲ +4,907
Educational Services	1.0%78	1.3%114	1.3%108	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +30– 0.0 pp▼ −6▲ +0.3 pp▲ +36
Chicago citywide	10.1%132,909	9.0%128,169	9.2%134,671	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +1,762▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,502▼ −1.1 pp▼ −4,740
Health Care & Social Assistance	11.0%889	10.8%940	13.7%1,135	▲ +2.7 pp▲ +246▲ +2.9 pp▲ +195▼ −0.2 pp▲ +51
Chicago citywide	13.4%175,724	13.1%185,371	13.8%201,418	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +25,694▲ +0.7 pp▲ +16,047▼ −0.3 pp▲ +9,647
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	21.6%1,751	25.6%2,237	26.3%2,175	▲ +4.7 pp▲ +424▲ +0.6 pp▼ −62▲ +4.0 pp▲ +486
Chicago citywide	10.9%143,753	11.5%162,749	10.3%151,055	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,302▼ −1.2 pp▼ −11,694▲ +0.5 pp▲ +18,996
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	13.0%1,057	15.6%1,358	15.9%1,317	▲ +2.9 pp▲ +260▲ +0.3 pp▼ −41▲ +2.5 pp▲ +301
Chicago citywide	1.7%22,179	2.1%30,178	1.9%27,339	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +5,160▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,839▲ +0.4 pp▲ +7,999
Accommodation & Food Services	8.6%694	10.1%879	10.4%858	▲ +1.8 pp▲ +164▲ +0.3 pp▼ −21▲ +1.5 pp▲ +185
Chicago citywide	9.3%121,574	9.4%132,571	8.5%123,716	▼ −0.8 pp▲ +2,142▼ −0.9 pp▼ −8,855▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,997
Other Services	5.2%423	5.1%449	5.9%490	▲ +0.7 pp▲ +67▲ +0.8 pp▲ +41▼ −0.1 pp▲ +26
Chicago citywide	4.5%59,098	4.4%61,698	4.0%59,136	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +38▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,562▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,600
Public Administration	0.1%8	0.0%0	0.0%0	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −8– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.1 pp▼ −8
Chicago citywide	4.2%54,814	3.6%51,684	3.5%51,418	▼ −0.7 pp▼ −3,396▼ −0.1 pp▼ −266▼ −0.5 pp▼ −3,130

Earnings of Jobs in Ward 33

Category	Ward 33
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	22.1%1,829
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	32.8%2,717
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	45.1%3,734
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	22.1%1,829	12.7%185,297	▲ +9.4%	10/50
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	32.8%2,717	20.5%299,480	▲ +12.4%	20/50
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	45.1%3,734	66.9%978,851	▼ -21.8%	37/50
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	32.3%2,613	27.3%2,387	22.1%1,829	▼ −10.2 pp▼ −784▼ −5.3 pp▼ −558▼ −4.9 pp▼ −226
Chicago citywide	21.3%280,137	16.8%238,135	12.7%185,297	▼ −8.7 pp▼ −94,840▼ −4.1 pp▼ −52,838▼ −4.5 pp▼ −42,002
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	37.0%2,996	36.9%3,222	32.8%2,717	▼ −4.2 pp▼ −279▼ −4.1 pp▼ −505▼ −0.1 pp▲ +226
Chicago citywide	30.7%403,250	26.7%378,530	20.5%299,480	▼ −10.2 pp▼ −103,770▼ −6.3 pp▼ −79,050▼ −4.0 pp▼ −24,720
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	30.8%2,491	35.7%3,119	45.1%3,734	▲ +14.3 pp▲ +1,243▲ +9.4 pp▲ +615▲ +5.0 pp▲ +628
Chicago citywide	48.0%630,740	56.5%800,154	66.9%978,851	▲ +18.9 pp▲ +348,111▲ +10.4 pp▲ +178,697▲ +8.5 pp▲ +169,414

Jobs in Ward 33 by Firm Age

Category	Ward 33
Firm age: 0–1 years	3.0%247
Firm age: 2–3 years	2.5%205
Firm age: 4–5 years	3.4%285
Firm age: 6–10 years	7.8%648
Firm age: 11 or more years	83.3%6,895
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years	3.0%247	2.8%37,293	▲ +0.2%	32/50
Firm age: 2–3 years	2.5%205	2.8%37,154	▼ -0.3%	33/50
Firm age: 4–5 years	3.4%285	3.2%41,869	▲ +0.3%	22/50
Firm age: 6–10 years	7.8%648	7.8%102,354	▲ +0.1%	29/50
Firm age: 11 or more years	83.3%6,895	83.4%1,098,247	▼ -0.1%	17/50
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years	2.4%194	3.0%261	3.0%247	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +53– 0.0 pp▼ −14▲ +0.6 pp▲ +67
Chicago citywide	2.9%33,224	2.6%33,244	2.8%37,293	– 0.0 pp▲ +4,069▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,049▼ −0.2 pp▲ +20
Firm age: 2–3 years	3.7%299	3.4%296	2.5%205	▼ −1.2 pp▼ −94▼ −0.9 pp▼ −91▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3
Chicago citywide	4.0%46,935	3.3%42,284	2.8%37,154	▼ −1.2 pp▼ −9,781▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,130▼ −0.7 pp▼ −4,651
Firm age: 4–5 years	2.2%182	4.8%419	3.4%285	▲ +1.2 pp▲ +103▼ −1.4 pp▼ −134▲ +2.6 pp▲ +237
Chicago citywide	3.7%42,688	3.6%46,058	3.2%41,869	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −819▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,189▼ −0.1 pp▲ +3,370
Firm age: 6–10 years	12.9%1,044	6.9%603	7.8%648	▼ −5.1 pp▼ −396▲ +0.9 pp▲ +45▼ −6.0 pp▼ −441
Chicago citywide	8.2%94,955	8.6%109,934	7.8%102,354	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +7,399▼ −0.9 pp▼ −7,580▲ +0.5 pp▲ +14,979
Firm age: 11 or more years	78.8%6,372	81.9%7,145	83.3%6,895	▲ +4.5 pp▲ +523▲ +1.4 pp▼ −250▲ +3.1 pp▲ +773
Chicago citywide	81.3%946,852	81.8%1,043,037	83.4%1,098,247	▲ +2.1 pp▲ +151,395▲ +1.6 pp▲ +55,210▲ +0.5 pp▲ +96,185

Jobs in Ward 33 by Firm Size

Category	Ward 33
Firm size: 0–19 employees	26.1%2,158
Firm size: 20–49 employees	12.4%1,025
Firm size: 50–249 employees	14.6%1,206
Firm size: 250–499 employees	1.6%132
Firm size: 500 or more employees	45.4%3,759
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees	26.1%2,158	12.8%168,975	▲ +13.2%	12/50
Firm size: 20–49 employees	12.4%1,025	7.3%96,432	▲ +5.1%	12/50
Firm size: 50–249 employees	14.6%1,206	13.8%181,123	▲ +0.8%	32/50
Firm size: 250–499 employees	1.6%132	5.7%74,787	▼ -4.1%	40/50
Firm size: 500 or more employees	45.4%3,759	60.4%795,600	▼ -15.0%	24/50
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees	23.2%1,876	24.8%2,165	26.1%2,158	▲ +2.9 pp▲ +282▲ +1.2 pp▼ −7▲ +1.6 pp▲ +289
Chicago citywide	13.9%162,248	13.3%169,949	12.8%168,975	▼ −1.1 pp▲ +6,727▼ −0.5 pp▼ −974▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,701
Firm size: 20–49 employees	13.2%1,067	13.0%1,132	12.4%1,025	▼ −0.8 pp▼ −42▼ −0.6 pp▼ −107▼ −0.2 pp▲ +65
Chicago citywide	8.4%97,503	8.2%103,945	7.3%96,432	▼ −1.0 pp▼ −1,071▼ −0.8 pp▼ −7,513▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,442
Firm size: 50–249 employees	14.7%1,187	11.5%1,007	14.6%1,206	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +19▲ +3.0 pp▲ +199▼ −3.1 pp▼ −180
Chicago citywide	15.7%183,275	14.9%189,930	13.8%181,123	▼ −2.0 pp▼ −2,152▼ −1.1 pp▼ −8,807▼ −0.8 pp▲ +6,655
Firm size: 250–499 employees	1.8%147	6.3%550	1.6%132	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −15▼ −4.7 pp▼ −418▲ +4.5 pp▲ +403
Chicago citywide	6.3%72,992	5.9%74,603	5.7%74,787	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,795▼ −0.2 pp▲ +184▼ −0.4 pp▲ +1,611
Firm size: 500 or more employees	47.1%3,814	44.4%3,870	45.4%3,759	▼ −1.7 pp▼ −55▲ +1.0 pp▼ −111▼ −2.8 pp▲ +56
Chicago citywide	55.7%648,636	57.8%736,130	60.4%795,600	▲ +4.7 pp▲ +146,964▲ +2.7 pp▲ +59,470▲ +2.1 pp▲ +87,494

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 33
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	13.3% ±1.1 pp13.3%±1.1 pp7,497 ±617
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	89.0% ±2.7 pp11.9%±0.4 pp6,675 ±201
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	11.0% ±3.2 pp1.5%±0.4 pp823 ±239
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	13.3%±1.1 pp13.3%±1.1 pp7,497±617	13.5%±0.2 pp13.5%±0.2 pp365,577±5,480	▼ -0.1%▼ -0.1%	30/50
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	89.0%±2.7 pp11.9%±0.4 pp6,675±201	83.0%±0.5 pp11.2%±0.1 pp303,520±1,897	▲ +6.0%▲ +0.7%	17/5026/50
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	11.0%±3.2 pp1.5%±0.4 pp823±239	17.0%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.1 pp62,057±2,247	▼ -6.0%▼ -0.8%	34/5036/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 33
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	8.3% ±1.0 pp8.3%±1.0 pp4,647 ±541
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	54.0% ±5.6 pp4.5%±0.5 pp2,512 ±262
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	46.0% ±6.8 pp3.8%±0.6 pp2,136 ±315
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	71.9% ±2.3 pp6.0%±0.2 pp3,339 ±108
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	28.1% ±5.8 pp2.3%±0.5 pp1,308 ±267
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	8.3%±1.0 pp8.3%±1.0 pp4,647±541	7.4%±0.1 pp7.4%±0.1 pp201,851±4,036	▲ +0.9%▲ +0.9%	14/50
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	54.0%±5.6 pp4.5%±0.5 pp2,512±262	52.4%±0.7 pp3.9%±0.1 pp105,720±1,511	▲ +1.7%▲ +0.6%	31/508/50
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	46.0%±6.8 pp3.8%±0.6 pp2,136±315	47.6%±1.2 pp3.5%±0.1 pp96,131±2,437	▼ -1.7%▲ +0.3%	20/5013/50
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	71.9%±2.3 pp6.0%±0.2 pp3,339±108	67.0%±1.0 pp5.0%±0.1 pp135,301±1,945	▲ +4.8%▲ +1.0%	26/5010/50
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	28.1%±5.8 pp2.3%±0.5 pp1,308±267	33.0%±1.2 pp2.5%±0.1 pp66,550±2,459	▼ -4.8%▼ -0.1%	25/5021/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category	Ward 33
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	8.2% ±3.0 pp691 ±252
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	7.5% ±4.3 pp285 ±163
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	8.2%±3.0 pp691±252	5.9%±0.5 pp—	▲ +2.3%	10/50
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	7.5%±4.3 pp285±163	5.4%±0.6 pp—	▲ +2.1%	13/50
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category	Ward 33
Owner-Occupied Households	42.7% ±2.3 pp9,707 ±529
Renter-Occupied Households	57.3% ±2.4 pp13,007 ±551
Owner-Occupied Residents	41.6% ±2.3 pp23,060 ±1,285
Renter-Occupied Residents	58.4% ±3.3 pp32,434 ±1,835
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Owner-Occupied Households	42.7%±2.3 pp9,707±529	46.0%±0.4 pp534,012±4,939	▼ -3.3%	28/50
Renter-Occupied Households	57.3%±2.4 pp13,007±551	54.0%±0.4 pp626,193±5,183	▲ +3.3%	23/50
Owner-Occupied Residents	41.6%±2.3 pp23,060±1,285	51.8%±0.5 pp1,377,219±13,574	▼ -10.3%	36/50
Renter-Occupied Residents	58.4%±3.3 pp32,434±1,835	48.2%±0.5 pp1,280,665±13,500	▲ +10.3%	15/50
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category	Ward 33
Median Year Moved In	2016±0.6 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later	6.9% ±1.5 pp1,558 ±336
Moved in 2020 to 2022	24.8% ±2.2 pp5,577 ±496
Moved in 2010 to 2019	42.0% ±3.0 pp9,428 ±680
Moved in 2000 to 2009	14.6% ±1.9 pp3,276 ±434
Moved in 1990 to 1999	7.5% ±1.2 pp1,689 ±270
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	4.2% ±0.9 pp935 ±199
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Moved In	2016±0.6 yr	2015±1.0 yr	▲ +1	13/50
Moved in 2023 or Later	6.9%±1.5 pp1,558±336	5.9%±0.2 pp68,884±2,742	▲ +1.0%	13/50
Moved in 2020 to 2022	24.8%±2.2 pp5,577±496	24.1%±0.4 pp279,417±5,059	▲ +0.7%	20/50
Moved in 2010 to 2019	42.0%±3.0 pp9,428±680	39.2%±0.5 pp455,125±5,772	▲ +2.7%	13/50
Moved in 2000 to 2009	14.6%±1.9 pp3,276±434	13.8%±0.3 pp160,353±3,324	▲ +0.8%	24/50
Moved in 1990 to 1999	7.5%±1.2 pp1,689±270	8.2%±0.2 pp95,243±2,390	▼ -0.7%	29/50
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	4.2%±0.9 pp935±199	8.7%±0.2 pp101,183±2,362	▼ -4.6%	38/50
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 33
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	15.4% ±2.0 pp15.4%±2.0 pp8,678 ±1,138
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	10.6% ±1.7 pp68.7%±5.8 pp5,963 ±929
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	0.6% ±0.3 pp3.8%±1.7 pp334 ±157
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	2.1% ±0.6 pp13.8%±3.5 pp1,194 ±341
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	2.1% ±1.0 pp13.7%±6.5 pp1,187 ±587
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	15.4%±2.0 pp15.4%±2.0 pp8,678±1,138	14.0%±0.3 pp14.0%±0.3 pp375,475±8,289	▲ +1.4%▲ +1.4%	18/50
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	10.6%±1.7 pp68.7%±5.8 pp5,963±929	9.8%±0.3 pp69.9%±1.0 pp262,365±6,953	▲ +0.8%▼ -1.2%	21/5039/50
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	0.6%±0.3 pp3.8%±1.7 pp334±157	0.8%±0.1 pp5.5%±0.4 pp20,552±1,626	▼ -0.2%▼ -1.6%	25/5031/50
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	2.1%±0.6 pp13.8%±3.5 pp1,194±341	2.5%±0.1 pp17.6%±0.7 pp65,936±2,918	▼ -0.3%▼ -3.8%	16/5020/50
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	2.1%±1.0 pp13.7%±6.5 pp1,187±587	1.0%±0.1 pp7.1%±0.8 pp26,622±3,040	▲ +1.1%▲ +6.6%	4/508/50
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 33
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	7.4% ±1.4 pp7.4%±1.4 pp1,806 ±347
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	2.5% ±0.8 pp33.1%±8.9 pp597 ±198
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.5% ±0.4 pp6.5%±5.1 pp117 ±96
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.1% ±0.2 pp0.8%±3.0 pp15 ±55
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	4.4% ±1.3 pp59.6%±13.2 pp1,077 ±315
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	4.3% ±1.4 pp4.3%±1.4 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	1.2% ±1.0 pp1.2%±1.0 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	7.4%±1.4 pp7.4%±1.4 pp1,806±347	9.1%±0.2 pp9.1%±0.2 pp116,849±2,682	▼ -1.7%▼ -1.7%	28/50
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	2.5%±0.8 pp33.1%±8.9 pp597±198	2.5%±0.1 pp27.1%±1.4 pp31,723±1,796	0%▲ +5.9%	23/5017/50
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.5%±0.4 pp6.5%±5.1 pp117±96	0.6%±0.1 pp6.0%±0.7 pp7,037±795	▼ -0.1%▲ +0.5%	25/5018/50
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.1%±0.2 pp0.8%±3.0 pp15±55	0.2%±0.0 pp2.4%±0.5 pp2,831±587	▼ -0.2%▼ -1.6%	35/5030/50
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	4.4%±1.3 pp59.6%±13.2 pp1,077±315	5.9%±0.3 pp64.4%±2.5 pp75,258±3,387	▼ -1.5%▼ -4.8%	31/5032/50
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	4.3%±1.4 pp4.3%±1.4 pp—	4.8%±0.3 pp4.8%±0.3 pp—	▼ -0.5%▼ -0.5%	30/50
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	1.2%±1.0 pp1.2%±1.0 pp—	1.3%±0.1 pp1.3%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.1%▼ -0.1%	22/50
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category	Ward 33
Median Year Built	1942±1 yr
Pre-1940	56.1% ±2.6 pp13,622 ±634
1940-2009	40.1% ±2.8 pp9,731 ±678
2010+	3.8% ±0.9 pp916 ±225
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Built	1942±1 yr	1953±1 yr	▼ −11 yrs	45/50
Pre-1940	56.1%±2.6 pp13,622±634	38.8%±0.4 pp495,715±4,678	▲ +17.3%	7/50
1940-2009	40.1%±2.8 pp9,731±678	54.9%±0.6 pp700,698±7,435	▼ -14.8%	43/50
2010+	3.8%±0.9 pp916±225	6.3%±0.2 pp80,641±2,725	▼ -2.5%	22/50
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category	Ward 33
Population Density	25,127 /sq mi±1,156/sq mi
Single-Family Homes	18.9% ±1.5 pp4,576 ±371
Buildings With 2–4 Units	39.3% ±2.9 pp9,532 ±697
Buildings With 5–19 Units	31.2% ±2.7 pp7,581 ±656
Buildings With 20 or More Units	10.5% ±1.4 pp2,542 ±335
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Population Density	25,127 /sq mi±1,156/sq mi	11,721 /sq mi±26/sq mi	▲ +13,406 /sq mi	8/50
Single-Family Homes	18.9%±1.5 pp4,576±371	29.2%±0.3 pp372,679±3,989	▼ -10.3%	32/50
Buildings With 2–4 Units	39.3%±2.9 pp9,532±697	27.4%±0.4 pp349,976±4,957	▲ +11.9%	16/50
Buildings With 5–19 Units	31.2%±2.7 pp7,581±656	16.2%±0.3 pp206,420±4,124	▲ +15.1%	3/50
Buildings With 20 or More Units	10.5%±1.4 pp2,542±335	27.0%±0.3 pp344,543±4,438	▼ -16.5%	24/50
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category	Ward 33
Studio	4.2% ±0.9 pp1,010 ±225
1 Bedroom	15.1% ±1.7 pp3,655 ±409
2 Bedrooms	45.4% ±2.8 pp11,030 ±668
3 Bedrooms	24.2% ±2.3 pp5,873 ±547
4 Bedrooms	9.0% ±1.2 pp2,177 ±299
5 or More Bedrooms	2.2% ±0.6 pp525 ±146
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Studio	4.2%±0.9 pp1,010±225	7.5%±0.3 pp95,749±3,205	▼ -3.3%	25/50
1 Bedroom	15.1%±1.7 pp3,655±409	20.1%±0.4 pp257,271±4,939	▼ -5.1%	28/50
2 Bedrooms	45.4%±2.8 pp11,030±668	33.1%±0.3 pp422,866±4,221	▲ +12.3%	1/50
3 Bedrooms	24.2%±2.3 pp5,873±547	26.1%±0.3 pp333,682±4,061	▼ -1.9%	34/50
4 Bedrooms	9.0%±1.2 pp2,177±299	9.0%±0.2 pp115,453±2,426	▼ -0.1%	30/50
5 or More Bedrooms	2.2%±0.6 pp525±146	4.1%±0.2 pp52,033±2,072	▼ -1.9%	41/50
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 33
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	4.0% ±1.2 pp4.0%±1.2 pp908 ±263
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	2.6% ±0.9 pp64.4%±11.2 pp585 ±197
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	1.4% ±0.8 pp35.6%±16.3 pp323 ±175
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	4.0%±1.2 pp4.0%±1.2 pp908±263	3.4%±0.2 pp3.4%±0.2 pp39,979±1,996	▲ +0.6%▲ +0.6%	18/50
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	2.6%±0.9 pp64.4%±11.2 pp585±197	2.0%±0.1 pp58.2%±2.3 pp23,276±1,493	▲ +0.6%▲ +6.2%	20/5021/50
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	1.4%±0.8 pp35.6%±16.3 pp323±175	1.4%±0.1 pp41.8%±2.6 pp16,703±1,328	0%▼ -6.2%	21/5030/50
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category	Ward 33
Natural Gas Heat	87.0% ±1.9 pp19,546 ±433
Electric Heat	9.3% ±1.4 pp2,100 ±316
Other Heating Source	3.6% ±1.1 pp817 ±257
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Natural Gas Heat	87.0%±1.9 pp19,546±433	77.5%±0.3 pp899,660±3,501	▲ +9.5%	21/50
Electric Heat	9.3%±1.4 pp2,100±316	18.0%±0.3 pp208,937±3,864	▼ -8.7%	29/50
Other Heating Source	3.6%±1.1 pp817±257	4.4%±0.2 pp51,603±2,173	▼ -0.8%	27/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show

Category	Ward 33
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	37.4% ±2.3 pp8,404 ±511
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	26.1% ±2.4 pp5,855 ±538
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	36.5% ±3.0 pp8,203 ±663
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	15.1% ±1.8 pp3,387 ±415
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	31.8% ±3.4 pp4,052 ±430
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	28.0% ±3.5 pp3,571 ±444
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	40.2% ±3.5 pp5,117 ±446
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	15.8% ±2.4 pp2,010 ±308
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	45.0% ±2.7 pp4,167 ±254
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	23.2% ±3.1 pp2,147 ±287
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	31.7% ±5.1 pp2,936 ±470
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	14.2% ±2.8 pp1,317 ±262
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	38.9% ±2.9 pp2,858 ±217
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	26.7% ±3.3 pp1,962 ±241
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	34.3% ±6.0 pp2,522 ±438
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	15.7% ±3.2 pp1,156 ±238
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage and a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	68.6% ±4.7 pp1,308 ±89
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	9.7% ±7.8 pp185 ±149
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	21.7% ±8.7 pp414 ±167
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	8.5% ±5.7 pp162 ±108
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage and with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	37.4%±2.3 pp8,404±511	24.9%±0.4 pp289,047±4,524	▲ +12.5%	28/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	26.1%±2.4 pp5,855±538	23.8%±0.4 pp276,514±4,291	▲ +2.2%	8/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	36.5%±3.0 pp8,203±663	45.6%±0.5 pp529,378±5,291	▼ -9.1%	32/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	15.1%±1.8 pp3,387±415	24.0%±0.4 pp278,684±4,167	▼ -8.9%	41/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	31.8%±3.4 pp4,052±430	26.4%±0.5 pp155,936±3,134	▲ +5.4%	10/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	28.0%±3.5 pp3,571±444	25.3%±0.5 pp149,215±2,939	▲ +2.8%	11/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	40.2%±3.5 pp5,117±446	48.3%±0.7 pp285,567±4,222	▼ -8.2%	40/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	15.8%±2.4 pp2,010±308	25.5%±0.6 pp150,346±3,554	▼ -9.7%	45/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	45.0%±2.7 pp4,167±254	51.6%±0.6 pp272,277±2,904	▼ -6.5%	43/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	23.2%±3.1 pp2,147±287	19.6%±0.5 pp103,661±2,759	▲ +3.6%	6/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	31.7%±5.1 pp2,936±470	28.8%±0.6 pp151,994±3,034	▲ +3.0%	15/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	14.2%±2.8 pp1,317±262	13.8%±0.4 pp73,053±2,233	▲ +0.4%	26/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	38.9%±2.9 pp2,858±217	42.8%±0.7 pp146,216±2,365	▼ -3.9%	36/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	26.7%±3.3 pp1,962±241	23.9%±0.7 pp81,659±2,408	▲ +2.8%	15/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	34.3%±6.0 pp2,522±438	33.3%±0.8 pp113,882±2,596	▲ +1.0%	23/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	15.7%±3.2 pp1,156±238	15.4%±0.5 pp52,632±1,873	▲ +0.3%	24/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage and a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	68.6%±4.7 pp1,308±89	67.7%±0.9 pp126,058±1,613	▲ +0.9%	21/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	9.7%±7.8 pp185±149	11.8%±0.7 pp22,000±1,275	▼ -2.1%	40/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	21.7%±8.7 pp414±167	20.5%±0.8 pp38,106±1,492	▲ +1.2%	21/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	8.5%±5.7 pp162±108	11.0%±0.6 pp20,421±1,202	▼ -2.5%	39/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage and with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category	Ward 33
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$857±$46
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,199±$35
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$1,716±$48
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$2,359±$55
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	Over $3,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$857±$46	$594±$11	▲ +$263	10/50
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,199±$35	$1,011±$8	▲ +$188	10/50
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$1,716±$48	$1,560±$10	▲ +$156	13/50
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$2,359±$55	$2,329±$13	▲ +$29	18/50
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	Over $3,000	Over $3,000	—	1/50
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$833 ±27	$863 ±34	$857 ±46	▲ +$24▼ −$6▲ +$29
Chicago citywide	$609 ±7	$606 ±7	$594 ±11	▼ −$15▼ −$12▼ −$2
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$629 ±20	$703 ±28	$857 ±46	▲ +$228▲ +$154▲ +$74
Chicago citywide	$459 ±6	$494 ±6	$594 ±11	▲ +$135▲ +$100▲ +$35
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,096 ±22	$1,146 ±24	$1,199 ±35	▲ +$103▲ +$53▲ +$50
Chicago citywide	$992 ±5	$1,001 ±5	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$19▲ +$10▲ +$9
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$827 ±17	$934 ±19	$1,199 ±35	▲ +$372▲ +$265▲ +$107
Chicago citywide	$748 ±3	$816 ±4	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$262▲ +$195▲ +$67
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,475 ±45	$1,589 ±30	$1,716 ±48	▲ +$241▲ +$127▲ +$114
Chicago citywide	$1,493 ±8	$1,523 ±6	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$67▲ +$37▲ +$29
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,113 ±34	$1,295 ±25	$1,716 ±48	▲ +$603▲ +$421▲ +$182
Chicago citywide	$1,127 ±6	$1,241 ±5	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$433▲ +$319▲ +$114
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,175 ±87	$2,252 ±54	$2,359 ±55	▲ +$183▲ +$106▲ +$77
Chicago citywide	$2,333 ±12	$2,326 ±10	$2,329 ±13	▼ −$4▲ +$3▼ −$7
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,642 ±66	$1,836 ±44	$2,359 ±55	▲ +$717▲ +$523▲ +$194
Chicago citywide	$1,761 ±9	$1,896 ±8	$2,329 ±13	▲ +$569▲ +$434▲ +$135
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$3,239 ±124	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	$3,316 ±20	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$2,640 ±101	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	$2,703 ±16	—	———

Rent

Rent measure

Category	Ward 33
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$1,500±$39
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$885±$71
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,155±$45
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$1,479±$46
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,886±$47
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$2,276±$59
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$1,500±$39	$1,613±$12	▼ −$112	21/50
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$885±$71	$696±$20	▲ +$188	18/50
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,155±$45	$1,043±$8	▲ +$113	14/50
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$1,479±$46	$1,440±$10	▲ +$39	15/50
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,886±$47	$2,021±$21	▼ −$135	18/50
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$2,276±$59	$2,738±$29	▼ −$463	22/50
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33
Average Rent	$1,354±$41
10th Percentile Rent	$795±$65
25th Percentile Rent	$1,048±$33
Median Rent	$1,320±$39
75th Percentile Rent	$1,695±$57
90th Percentile Rent	$2,017±$96
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent	$1,354±$41	$1,452±$11	▼ −$98	19/50
10th Percentile Rent	$795±$65	$564±$21	▲ +$231	17/50
25th Percentile Rent	$1,048±$33	$913±$7	▲ +$135	14/50
Median Rent	$1,320±$39	$1,262±$12	▲ +$58	16/50
75th Percentile Rent	$1,695±$57	$1,868±$13	▼ −$173	20/50
90th Percentile Rent	$2,017±$96	$2,528±$38	▼ −$512	21/50
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category	Ward 33
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,920±$83
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,625±$78
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,062±$76
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,600±$128
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$3,354±$96
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	Over $4,000
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,920±$83	$2,734±$24	▲ +$187	12/50
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,625±$78	$1,270±$14	▲ +$355	11/50
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,062±$76	$1,697±$14	▲ +$365	13/50
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,600±$128	$2,339±$17	▲ +$261	15/50
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$3,354±$96	$3,269±$31	▲ +$85	17/50
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	Over $4,000	Over $4,000	—	1/50
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,871 ±81	$2,920 ±76	$2,920 ±83	▲ +$49– $0▲ +$49
Chicago citywide	$2,855 ±19	$2,793 ±23	$2,734 ±24	▼ −$121▼ −$60▼ −$61
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$2,167 ±61	$2,380 ±62	$2,920 ±83	▲ +$753▲ +$540▲ +$213
Chicago citywide	$2,154 ±14	$2,277 ±19	$2,734 ±24	▲ +$579▲ +$457▲ +$122
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,548 ±115	$1,675 ±132	$1,625 ±78	▲ +$77▼ −$50▲ +$127
Chicago citywide	$1,403 ±11	$1,356 ±11	$1,270 ±14	▼ −$133▼ −$86▼ −$47
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,168 ±87	$1,365 ±108	$1,625 ±78	▲ +$457▲ +$260▲ +$197
Chicago citywide	$1,059 ±8	$1,105 ±9	$1,270 ±14	▲ +$212▲ +$165▲ +$46
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,029 ±89	$2,086 ±63	$2,062 ±76	▲ +$33▼ −$23▲ +$57
Chicago citywide	$1,874 ±12	$1,800 ±12	$1,697 ±14	▼ −$177▼ −$103▼ −$74
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,531 ±68	$1,700 ±51	$2,062 ±76	▲ +$531▲ +$362▲ +$169
Chicago citywide	$1,414 ±9	$1,467 ±10	$1,697 ±14	▲ +$283▲ +$230▲ +$53
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,649 ±109	$2,686 ±101	$2,600 ±128	▼ −$49▼ −$85▲ +$36
Chicago citywide	$2,526 ±13	$2,422 ±13	$2,339 ±17	▼ −$187▼ −$83▼ −$103
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,999 ±82	$2,189 ±82	$2,600 ±128	▲ +$601▲ +$412▲ +$190
Chicago citywide	$1,906 ±10	$1,974 ±11	$2,339 ±17	▲ +$433▲ +$365▲ +$68
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$3,581 ±139	$3,522 ±113	$3,354 ±96	▼ −$227▼ −$168▼ −$59
Chicago citywide	$3,447 ±25	$3,343 ±25	$3,269 ±31	▼ −$178▼ −$74▼ −$104
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$2,702 ±105	$2,870 ±92	$3,354 ±96	▲ +$651▲ +$483▲ +$168
Chicago citywide	$2,601 ±19	$2,724 ±20	$3,269 ±31	▲ +$668▲ +$544▲ +$123
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$4,650 ±244	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	$4,578 ±59	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	—	$3,790 ±199	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	$3,731 ±48	—	———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category	Ward 33
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$1,102±$97
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$440±$160
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$692±$153
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$921±$80
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,158±$60
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	Over $1,500
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$1,102±$97	$1,078±$22	▲ +$24	15/50
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$440±$160	$418±$8	▲ +$21	25/50
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$692±$153	$601±$8	▲ +$92	17/50
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$921±$80	$859±$10	▲ +$62	19/50
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,158±$60	$1,197±$18	▼ −$39	22/50
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	Over $1,500	Over $1,500	—	1/50
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$912 ±51	$1,116 ±52	$1,102 ±97	▲ +$190▼ −$14▲ +$204
Chicago citywide	$957 ±15	$1,028 ±10	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$121▲ +$50▲ +$71
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$688 ±38	$910 ±42	$1,102 ±97	▲ +$413▲ +$192▲ +$221
Chicago citywide	$722 ±11	$838 ±8	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$355▲ +$240▲ +$116
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$452 ±95	$555 ±101	$440 ±160	▼ −$13▼ −$115▲ +$103
Chicago citywide	$429 ±6	$469 ±7	$418 ±8	▼ −$11▼ −$51▲ +$40
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$341 ±71	$452 ±82	$440 ±160	▲ +$98▼ −$13▲ +$111
Chicago citywide	$324 ±5	$382 ±5	$418 ±8	▲ +$95▲ +$36▲ +$59
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$628 ±104	$765 ±87	$692 ±153	▲ +$64▼ −$73▲ +$137
Chicago citywide	$586 ±6	$629 ±6	$601 ±8	▲ +$14▼ −$28▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$474 ±78	$624 ±71	$692 ±153	▲ +$218▲ +$69▲ +$149
Chicago citywide	$442 ±4	$513 ±5	$601 ±8	▲ +$158▲ +$88▲ +$70
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$879 ±48	$1,011 ±81	$921 ±80	▲ +$42▼ −$90▲ +$132
Chicago citywide	$815 ±9	$860 ±7	$859 ±10	▲ +$44▼ −$1▲ +$45
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$663 ±36	$824 ±66	$921 ±80	▲ +$258▲ +$97▲ +$161
Chicago citywide	$615 ±7	$701 ±6	$859 ±10	▲ +$244▲ +$158▲ +$86
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$1,243 ±87	$1,158 ±60	—▼ −$85—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,206 ±14	$1,197 ±18	—▼ −$9—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$1,013 ±71	$1,158 ±60	—▲ +$145—
Chicago citywide	—	$983 ±12	$1,197 ±18	—▲ +$214—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$1,558 ±154	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	$1,767 ±35	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$1,270 ±126	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	$1,440 ±28	—	———

Home Values

Category	Ward 33
Average Home Value	$472,126±$15,276
10th Percentile Home Value	$215,625±$17,384
25th Percentile Home Value	$287,656±$16,233
Median Home Value	$412,768±$23,695
75th Percentile Home Value	$616,032±$26,966
90th Percentile Home Value	$776,936±$46,699
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Average Home Value	$472,126±$15,276	$437,638±$7,358	▲ +$34,488	13/50
10th Percentile Home Value	$215,625±$17,384	$129,150±$3,756	▲ +$86,475	11/50
25th Percentile Home Value	$287,656±$16,233	$217,800±$1,804	▲ +$69,856	18/50
Median Home Value	$412,768±$23,695	$334,100±$2,424	▲ +$78,668	13/50
75th Percentile Home Value	$616,032±$26,966	$497,700±$3,730	▲ +$118,332	13/50
90th Percentile Home Value	$776,936±$46,699	$809,159±$15,691	▼ −$32,223	17/50
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$393,736 ±22,549	$428,868 ±15,572	$472,126 ±15,276	▲ +$78,390▲ +$43,259▲ +$35,132
Chicago citywide	$386,614 ±5,106	$424,380 ±4,754	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$51,024▲ +$13,258▲ +$37,766
Average Home Value (nominal dollars)	$297,146 ±17,017	$349,528 ±12,691	$472,126 ±15,276	▲ +$174,980▲ +$122,598▲ +$52,382
Chicago citywide	$291,771 ±3,853	$345,871 ±3,874	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$145,867▲ +$91,768▲ +$54,099
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$162,138 ±18,089	$194,027 ±21,319	$215,625 ±17,384	▲ +$53,487▲ +$21,599▲ +$31,888
Chicago citywide	$115,330 ±1,421	$124,313 ±1,339	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$13,821▲ +$4,838▲ +$8,983
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$122,363 ±13,651	$158,132 ±17,375	$215,625 ±17,384	▲ +$93,262▲ +$57,493▲ +$35,769
Chicago citywide	$87,037 ±1,072	$101,315 ±1,091	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$42,113▲ +$27,835▲ +$14,278
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$248,744 ±17,555	$267,910 ±13,202	$287,656 ±16,233	▲ +$38,911▲ +$19,745▲ +$19,166
Chicago citywide	$190,543 ±2,400	$199,018 ±1,255	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$27,257▲ +$18,782▲ +$8,475
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$187,723 ±13,248	$218,347 ±10,759	$287,656 ±16,233	▲ +$99,932▲ +$69,308▲ +$30,624
Chicago citywide	$143,800 ±1,811	$162,200 ±1,023	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$74,000▲ +$55,600▲ +$18,400
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$349,893 ±13,962	$388,194 ±18,442	$412,768 ±23,695	▲ +$62,876▲ +$24,574▲ +$38,302
Chicago citywide	$299,066 ±2,120	$316,564 ±2,118	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$35,034▲ +$17,536▲ +$17,498
Median Home Value (nominal dollars)	$264,058 ±10,537	$316,379 ±15,030	$412,768 ±23,695	▲ +$148,710▲ +$96,389▲ +$52,321
Chicago citywide	$225,700 ±1,600	$258,000 ±1,726	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$108,400▲ +$76,100▲ +$32,300
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$490,331 ±18,425	$564,430 ±28,066	$616,032 ±26,966	▲ +$125,701▲ +$51,602▲ +$74,099
Chicago citywide	$466,951 ±3,138	$490,797 ±3,892	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$30,749▲ +$6,903▲ +$23,846
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$370,045 ±13,905	$460,011 ±22,874	$616,032 ±26,966	▲ +$245,987▲ +$156,021▲ +$89,966
Chicago citywide	$352,400 ±2,368	$400,000 ±3,172	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$145,300▲ +$97,700▲ +$47,600
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$687,486 ±60,704	$818,482 ±40,684	$776,936 ±46,699	▲ +$89,450▼ −$41,546▲ +$130,996
Chicago citywide	$739,174 ±12,945	$835,769 ±9,047	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$69,986▼ −$26,610▲ +$96,595
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$518,835 ±45,812	$667,064 ±33,157	$776,936 ±46,699	▲ +$258,102▲ +$109,872▲ +$148,230
Chicago citywide	$557,842 ±9,770	$681,153 ±7,373	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$251,317▲ +$128,006▲ +$123,311

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 33
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	2.3%2.3%551
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	1.2%53.5%295
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.3%14.9%82
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.7%29.0%160
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.1%2.5%14
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	2.3%2.3%551	8.3%8.3%106,578	▼ -6.1%▼ -6.1%	38/50
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	1.2%53.5%295	4.8%57.2%60,910	▼ -3.5%▼ -3.6%	38/5034/50
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.3%14.9%82	1.1%13.8%14,721	▼ -0.8%▲ +1.1%	27/5019/50
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.7%29.0%160	2.1%25.7%27,383	▼ -1.5%▲ +3.3%	34/5015/50
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.1%2.5%14	0.3%3.3%3,564	▼ -0.2%▼ -0.8%	29/5018/50
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units	3.6%838	3.5%813	2.3%551	▼ −1.4 pp▼ −287▼ −1.2 pp▼ −262▼ −0.2 pp▼ −25
Chicago citywide	8.8%104,550	8.5%103,479	8.3%106,578	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,028▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,099▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,071
Housing Choice Vouchers	2.5%576	2.4%554	1.2%295	▼ −1.3 pp▼ −281▼ −1.1 pp▼ −259▼ −0.1 pp▼ −22
Chicago citywide	4.3%51,601	4.6%55,987	4.8%60,910	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +9,309▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,923▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,386
Public Housing	0.4%84	0.4%85	0.3%82	– 0.0 pp▼ −2– 0.0 pp▼ −3– 0.0 pp▲ +1
Chicago citywide	1.8%21,159	1.3%16,094	1.2%14,721	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −6,438▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,373▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,065
Project-Based Section 8	0.7%161	0.7%161	0.7%160	– 0.0 pp▼ −1– 0.0 pp▼ −1– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	2.2%25,940	2.2%26,951	2.1%27,383	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,443▼ −0.1 pp▲ +432– 0.0 pp▲ +1,011
Other Project-Based Programs	0.1%17	0.1%13	0.1%14	– 0.0 pp▼ −3– 0.0 pp▲ +1– 0.0 pp▼ −4
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,850	0.4%4,447	0.3%3,564	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,286▼ −0.1 pp▼ −883▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,403

Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category	Ward 33
Average Household Income	$18,127
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$432
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,287
Below 30% of Area Median Income	82.9%408
With Children	23.6%116
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	31.7%156
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this ward. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this ward. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this ward.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$18,127	$17,032	▲ +$1,095	15/50
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$432	$425	▲ +$7	23/50
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,287	$1,389	▼ -$102	37/50
Below 30% of Area Median Income	82.9%408	83.0%77,427	▼ -0.1 pp	23/50
With Children	23.6%116	31.0%28,919	▼ -7.4 pp	34/50
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	31.7%156	32.0%29,852	▼ -0.3 pp	29/50
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this ward. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this ward. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this ward.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income	$11,764	$14,285	$18,040	▲ +$6,276▲ +$3,754▲ +$2,521
Chicago citywide	$12,156	$13,665	$17,032	▲ +$4,876▲ +$3,367▲ +$1,509
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$310	$340	$430	▲ +$120▲ +$90▲ +$30
Chicago citywide	$310	$340	$425	▲ +$115▲ +$85▲ +$30
Average Monthly Government Spending	$865	$937	$1,281	▲ +$416▲ +$344▲ +$72
Chicago citywide	$916	$1,017	$1,389	▲ +$473▲ +$372▲ +$101
Below 30% of Area Median Income	81.4%—	82.4%—	83.1%—	▲ +1.8 pp—▲ +0.8 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
Chicago citywide	80.0%—	81.0%—	83.0%—	▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +2.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children	—	—	23.1%—	——————
Chicago citywide	—	—	31.0%—	——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	36.2%—	35.6%—	31.5%—	▼ −4.7 pp—▼ −4.1 pp—▼ −0.6 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category	Ward 33
Total Tree Canopy	19.2%286 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	70.8%1,053 acres
Natural Open Surfaces	10.0%149 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Total Tree Canopy	19.2%286 acres	18.4%25,934 acres	▲ +0.8%	20/50
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	70.8%1,053 acres	60.2%84,955 acres	▲ +10.6%	17/50
Natural Open Surfaces	10.0%149 acres	21.5%30,331 acres	▼ -11.5%	42/50
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category	Ward 33
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	28.6% ±3.3 pp16,009 ±1,822
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	44.8% ±3.5 pp25,085 ±1,985
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	26.6% ±3.1 pp14,903 ±1,710
Homes Without Air Conditioning	4.3%2,405
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	28.6%±3.3 pp16,009±1,822	26.1%±0.5 pp708,175±13,883	▲ +2.5%	15/50
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	44.8%±3.5 pp25,085±1,985	44.1%±0.6 pp1,195,501±15,477	▲ +0.7%	19/50
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	26.6%±3.1 pp14,903±1,710	29.8%±0.5 pp807,550±13,776	▼ -3.2%	33/50
Homes Without Air Conditioning	4.3%2,405	4.2%114,618	▲ +0.1%	23/50
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category	Ward 33
Drove Alone	55.7% ±2.5 pp14,576 ±660
Carpooled	10.6% ±1.9 pp2,765 ±491
Public Transit	23.1% ±2.6 pp6,046 ±688
Walked	5.7% ±1.1 pp1,498 ±277
Bikes	2.6% ±1.0 pp673 ±266
Other Commute Mode	1.9% ±0.8 pp499 ±214
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Drove Alone	55.7%±2.5 pp14,576±660	56.6%±0.4 pp772,696±5,998	▼ -1.0%	31/50
Carpooled	10.6%±1.9 pp2,765±491	9.3%±0.3 pp126,918±3,980	▲ +1.3%	22/50
Public Transit	23.1%±2.6 pp6,046±688	22.4%±0.4 pp305,691±6,011	▲ +0.7%	23/50
Walked	5.7%±1.1 pp1,498±277	7.3%±0.3 pp100,269±3,456	▼ -1.6%	18/50
Bikes	2.6%±1.0 pp673±266	1.8%±0.1 pp24,441±1,693	▲ +0.8%	15/50
Other Commute Mode	1.9%±0.8 pp499±214	2.5%±0.1 pp34,356±1,772	▼ -0.6%	12/50
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category	Ward 33
Average Commute Time (minutes)	33 min±0.7 min
Less Than 15 Minutes	11.0% ±1.6 pp2,894 ±419
15–29 Minutes	28.4% ±2.1 pp7,448 ±554
30–44 Minutes	31.3% ±2.8 pp8,226 ±723
45–59 Minutes	16.7% ±1.9 pp4,386 ±491
60 Minutes or More	12.6% ±1.6 pp3,295 ±426
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes)	33 min±0.7 min	33 min±0.2 min	▲ +0 min	31/50
Less Than 15 Minutes	11.0%±1.6 pp2,894±419	13.0%±0.3 pp140,252±3,438	▼ -2.0%	29/50
15–29 Minutes	28.4%±2.1 pp7,448±554	29.9%±0.5 pp322,586±5,056	▼ -1.5%	22/50
30–44 Minutes	31.3%±2.8 pp8,226±723	29.6%±0.4 pp318,782±4,584	▲ +1.8%	19/50
45–59 Minutes	16.7%±1.9 pp4,386±491	14.0%±0.3 pp151,451±3,075	▲ +2.7%	12/50
60 Minutes or More	12.6%±1.6 pp3,295±426	13.4%±0.3 pp144,940±3,715	▼ -0.9%	30/50
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category	Ward 33
Average Vehicles per Household	1.21±0.06
Households With No Vehicle	16.3% ±2.1 pp3,673 ±463
Households With 1 Vehicle	53.3% ±2.6 pp11,976 ±577
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	30.3% ±2.5 pp6,813 ±561
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Average Vehicles per Household	1.21±0.06	1.12±0.01	▲ +0.09	21/50
Households With No Vehicle	16.3%±2.1 pp3,673±463	26.6%±0.4 pp308,497±5,087	▼ -10.2%	36/50
Households With 1 Vehicle	53.3%±2.6 pp11,976±577	45.2%±0.4 pp524,900±5,145	▲ +8.1%	4/50
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	30.3%±2.5 pp6,813±561	28.2%±0.4 pp326,808±4,200	▲ +2.2%	24/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Ward 33 Residents Work

Category	Ward 33
Loop	17.4%4,360
Near North Side	8.8%2,212
Near West Side	5.7%1,431
Lake View	2.6%657
West Town	2.5%623
All other city neighborhoods	25.7%6,456
Outside the city	37.2%9,334
↳ Skokie village, IL	2.2%547
↳ Evanston city, IL	2.2%542
↳ Des Plaines city, IL	1.2%289
↳ Northbrook village, IL	1.0%262
↳ Elk Grove Village village, IL	1.0%248
↳ All other Illinois locations	28.4%7,109
Out of state	1.3%337
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for ward 33 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference
Loop	17.4%4,360	21.5%259,168	▼ -4.1%
Near North Side	8.8%2,212	9.1%109,334	▼ -0.3%
Near West Side	5.7%1,431	6.7%80,119	▼ -0.9%
Lake View	2.6%657	1.4%17,185	▲ +1.2%
West Town	2.5%623	2.1%25,622	▲ +0.4%
All other city neighborhoods	25.7%6,456	21.1%253,663	▲ +4.7%
Outside the city	37.2%9,334	35.9%432,365	▲ +1.3%
↳ Skokie village, IL	2.2%547	1.3%15,779	▲ +0.9%
↳ Evanston city, IL	2.2%542	1.5%17,547	▲ +0.7%
↳ Des Plaines city, IL	1.2%289	0.8%9,268	▲ +0.4%
↳ Northbrook village, IL	1.0%262	0.6%7,517	▲ +0.4%
↳ Elk Grove Village village, IL	1.0%248	0.7%8,181	▲ +0.3%
↳ All other Illinois locations	28.4%7,109	27.4%330,297	▲ +0.9%
Out of state	1.3%337	2.2%26,136	▼ -0.8%
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for ward 33 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Loop	15.5%3,745	16.6%4,191	17.4%4,360	▲ +1.9 pp▲ +615▲ +0.8 pp▲ +169▲ +1.1 pp▲ +446
Chicago citywide	20.0%224,635	21.0%252,791	21.5%259,168	▲ +1.5 pp▲ +34,533▲ +0.5 pp▲ +6,377▲ +1.0 pp▲ +28,156
Near North Side	8.7%2,101	9.1%2,300	8.8%2,212	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +111▼ −0.3 pp▼ −88▲ +0.4 pp▲ +199
Chicago citywide	8.2%92,142	9.4%112,858	9.1%109,334	▲ +0.9 pp▲ +17,192▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3,524▲ +1.2 pp▲ +20,716
Near West Side	5.0%1,211	5.4%1,355	5.7%1,431	▲ +0.7 pp▲ +220▲ +0.3 pp▲ +76▲ +0.4 pp▲ +144
Chicago citywide	6.2%69,083	6.6%79,757	6.7%80,119	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +11,036– 0.0 pp▲ +362▲ +0.5 pp▲ +10,674
Lake View	2.3%553	2.6%664	2.6%657	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +104– 0.0 pp▼ −7▲ +0.3 pp▲ +111
Chicago citywide	1.4%15,246	1.6%19,005	1.4%17,185	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,939▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,820▲ +0.2 pp▲ +3,759
West Town	2.2%537	2.5%634	2.5%623	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +86– 0.0 pp▼ −11▲ +0.3 pp▲ +97
Chicago citywide	2.2%24,512	2.1%25,359	2.1%25,622	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,110– 0.0 pp▲ +263▼ −0.1 pp▲ +847
All other city neighborhoods	27.4%6,608	26.5%6,669	25.7%6,456	▼ −1.6 pp▼ −152▼ −0.7 pp▼ −213▼ −0.9 pp▲ +61
Chicago citywide	22.9%257,015	21.5%259,132	21.1%253,663	▼ −1.8 pp▼ −3,352▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,469▼ −1.4 pp▲ +2,117
Outside the city	38.7%9,334	37.3%9,399	37.2%9,334	▼ −1.4 pp– 0▼ −0.1 pp▼ −65▼ −1.4 pp▲ +65
Chicago citywide	36.8%412,807	35.7%430,135	35.9%432,365	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +19,558▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,230▼ −1.0 pp▲ +17,328
Skokie village, IL	2.0%495	2.1%541	2.2%547	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +52– 0.0 pp▲ +6▲ +0.1 pp▲ +46
Chicago citywide	1.1%12,426	1.1%12,901	1.3%15,779	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +3,353▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,878– 0.0 pp▲ +475
Evanston city, IL	2.0%490	2.2%548	2.2%542	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +52– 0.0 pp▼ −6▲ +0.1 pp▲ +58
Chicago citywide	1.6%17,922	1.6%18,922	1.5%17,547	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −375▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,375– 0.0 pp▲ +1,000
Des Plaines city, IL	1.4%335	1.1%281	1.2%289	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −46– 0.0 pp▲ +8▼ −0.3 pp▼ −54
Chicago citywide	0.8%9,241	0.8%9,141	0.8%9,268	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +27– 0.0 pp▲ +127▼ −0.1 pp▼ −100
Northbrook village, IL	1.2%292	0.9%225	1.0%262	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −30▲ +0.2 pp▲ +37▼ −0.3 pp▼ −67
Chicago citywide	0.6%7,091	0.6%7,489	0.6%7,517	– 0.0 pp▲ +426– 0.0 pp▲ +28– 0.0 pp▲ +398
Elk Grove Village village, IL	1.4%340	1.2%297	1.0%248	▼ −0.4 pp▼ −92▼ −0.2 pp▼ −49▼ −0.2 pp▼ −43
Chicago citywide	0.8%8,559	0.8%10,071	0.7%8,181	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −378▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,890▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,512
All other Illinois locations	29.2%7,045	28.1%7,081	28.4%7,109	▼ −0.8 pp▲ +64▲ +0.3 pp▲ +28▼ −1.1 pp▲ +36
Chicago citywide	28.0%314,112	27.1%326,235	27.4%330,297	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +16,185▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,062▼ −0.9 pp▲ +12,123
Out of state	1.4%337	1.4%341	1.3%337	▼ −0.1 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▼ −4– 0.0 pp▲ +4
Chicago citywide	2.2%24,577	2.3%27,198	2.2%26,136	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,559▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,062▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,621

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Ward 33

Category	Ward 33
Albany Park	5.8%481
Irving Park	3.7%308
Belmont Cragin	2.5%211
Lake View	2.3%194
Portage Park	2.2%183
All other city neighborhoods	34.5%2,856
Outside the city	48.9%4,047
↳ Skokie village, IL	1.8%145
↳ Evanston city, IL	1.0%81
↳ Palatine village, IL	0.9%74
↳ Cicero town, IL	0.8%67
↳ Des Plaines city, IL	0.8%64
↳ All other Illinois locations	40.7%3,371
Out of state	3.0%245
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in ward 33; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference
Albany Park	5.8%481	0.8%12,356	▲ +5.0%
Irving Park	3.7%308	1.1%15,983	▲ +2.6%
Belmont Cragin	2.5%211	1.1%15,818	▲ +1.5%
Lake View	2.3%194	3.1%44,776	▼ -0.7%
Portage Park	2.2%183	1.1%16,320	▲ +1.1%
All other city neighborhoods	34.5%2,856	37.1%542,952	▼ -2.6%
Outside the city	48.9%4,047	47.2%691,556	▲ +1.6%
↳ Skokie village, IL	1.8%145	0.9%12,545	▲ +0.9%
↳ Evanston city, IL	1.0%81	0.9%13,044	▲ +0.1%
↳ Palatine village, IL	0.9%74	0.4%5,611	▲ +0.5%
↳ Cicero town, IL	0.8%67	0.8%10,993	▲ +0.1%
↳ Des Plaines city, IL	0.8%64	0.5%8,039	▲ +0.2%
↳ All other Illinois locations	40.7%3,371	37.0%540,957	▲ +3.8%
Out of state	3.0%245	4.9%72,124	▼ -2.0%
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in ward 33; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Albany Park	5.0%406	5.2%455	5.8%481	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +75▲ +0.6 pp▲ +26▲ +0.2 pp▲ +49
Chicago citywide	0.9%11,355	0.9%12,353	0.8%12,356	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,001– 0.0 pp▲ +3– 0.0 pp▲ +998
Irving Park	4.3%351	4.1%362	3.7%308	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −43▼ −0.4 pp▼ −54▼ −0.2 pp▲ +11
Chicago citywide	1.2%15,127	1.1%16,161	1.1%15,983	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +856– 0.0 pp▼ −178– 0.0 pp▲ +1,034
Belmont Cragin	2.2%176	2.1%182	2.5%211	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +35▲ +0.5 pp▲ +29▼ −0.1 pp▲ +6
Chicago citywide	1.2%15,223	1.1%15,543	1.1%15,818	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +595– 0.0 pp▲ +275▼ −0.1 pp▲ +320
Lake View	1.8%143	1.8%155	2.3%194	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +51▲ +0.6 pp▲ +39– 0.0 pp▲ +12
Chicago citywide	3.2%41,852	3.2%45,855	3.1%44,776	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,924▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,079▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,003
Portage Park	2.2%181	1.9%169	2.2%183	– 0.0 pp▲ +2▲ +0.3 pp▲ +14▼ −0.3 pp▼ −12
Chicago citywide	1.2%15,600	1.1%16,115	1.1%16,320	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +720– 0.0 pp▲ +205– 0.0 pp▲ +515
All other city neighborhoods	34.3%2,779	34.5%3,010	34.5%2,856	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +77– 0.0 pp▼ −154▲ +0.2 pp▲ +231
Chicago citywide	38.3%503,539	38.2%541,560	37.1%542,952	▼ −1.2 pp▲ +39,413▼ −1.1 pp▲ +1,392▼ −0.1 pp▲ +38,021
Outside the city	49.4%4,005	49.7%4,338	48.9%4,047	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +42▼ −0.8 pp▼ −291▲ +0.3 pp▲ +333
Chicago citywide	45.9%603,753	45.4%642,891	47.2%691,556	▲ +1.3 pp▲ +87,803▲ +1.9 pp▲ +48,665▼ −0.6 pp▲ +39,138
Skokie village, IL	2.0%163	1.9%168	1.8%145	▼ −0.3 pp▼ −18▼ −0.2 pp▼ −23▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5
Chicago citywide	0.9%12,311	0.9%12,525	0.9%12,545	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +234– 0.0 pp▲ +20▼ −0.1 pp▲ +214
Evanston city, IL	0.8%63	0.7%60	1.0%81	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +18▲ +0.3 pp▲ +21▼ −0.1 pp▼ −3
Chicago citywide	0.9%12,386	0.9%13,410	0.9%13,044	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +658▼ −0.1 pp▼ −366– 0.0 pp▲ +1,024
Palatine village, IL	0.5%38	0.8%66	0.9%74	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +36▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8▲ +0.3 pp▲ +28
Chicago citywide	0.4%4,671	0.4%5,161	0.4%5,611	– 0.0 pp▲ +940– 0.0 pp▲ +450– 0.0 pp▲ +490
Cicero town, IL	0.8%64	0.9%75	0.8%67	– 0.0 pp▲ +3▼ −0.1 pp▼ −8▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11
Chicago citywide	0.8%9,934	0.8%11,086	0.8%10,993	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,059– 0.0 pp▼ −93– 0.0 pp▲ +1,152
Des Plaines city, IL	0.8%64	0.7%65	0.8%64	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▼ −1– 0.0 pp▲ +1
Chicago citywide	0.5%6,821	0.5%7,586	0.5%8,039	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,218– 0.0 pp▲ +453– 0.0 pp▲ +765
All other Illinois locations	41.0%3,317	40.8%3,562	40.7%3,371	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +54▼ −0.1 pp▼ −191▼ −0.1 pp▲ +245
Chicago citywide	35.6%467,892	35.1%497,967	37.0%540,957	▲ +1.4 pp▲ +73,065▲ +1.8 pp▲ +42,990▼ −0.5 pp▲ +30,075
Out of state	3.1%249	3.7%322	3.0%245	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −4▼ −0.7 pp▼ −77▲ +0.6 pp▲ +73
Chicago citywide	4.9%63,789	4.8%68,287	4.9%72,124	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8,335▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,837– 0.0 pp▲ +4,498

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category	Ward 33
No Computer or Smartphone	2.7% ±0.8 pp608 ±187
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	10.2% ±1.6 pp2,285 ±353
Desktop or Laptop Available	83.6% ±2.2 pp18,779 ±483
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
No Computer or Smartphone	2.7%±0.8 pp608±187	5.1%±0.2 pp58,709±2,246	▼ -2.4%	42/50
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	10.2%±1.6 pp2,285±353	10.4%±0.3 pp120,218±3,642	▼ -0.2%	29/50
Desktop or Laptop Available	83.6%±2.2 pp18,779±483	79.7%±0.4 pp924,956±4,919	▲ +3.9%	18/50
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category	Ward 33
Has Internet Access	95.5% ±1.5 pp21,461 ±334
Cellular Data Plan Only	11.5% ±1.7 pp2,589 ±375
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	4.4% ±1.0 pp997 ±234
No Internet Access	4.5% ±1.0 pp1,001 ±231
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Has Internet Access	95.5%±1.5 pp21,461±334	93.1%±0.3 pp1,080,419±3,310	▲ +2.4%	11/50
Cellular Data Plan Only	11.5%±1.7 pp2,589±375	12.5%±0.3 pp145,219±3,463	▼ -1.0%	33/50
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	4.4%±1.0 pp997±234	3.9%±0.2 pp45,350±1,940	▲ +0.5%	14/50
No Internet Access	4.5%±1.0 pp1,001±231	6.9%±0.2 pp79,786±2,730	▼ -2.4%	40/50
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category	Ward 33
Uninsured Residents	17.6% ±1.9 pp9,842 ±1,045
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	6.0% ±2.6 pp3,353 ±1,456
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	22.7% ±2.5 pp12,726 ±1,424
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	5.3% ±3.7 pp2,974 ±2,084
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Uninsured Residents	17.6%±1.9 pp9,842±1,045	9.8%±0.2 pp264,391±5,512	▲ +7.8%	2/50
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	6.0%±2.6 pp3,353±1,456	3.9%±0.3 pp104,687±8,689	▲ +2.1%	11/50
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	22.7%±2.5 pp12,726±1,424	13.3%±0.3 pp361,430±8,202	▲ +9.4%	7/50
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	5.3%±3.7 pp2,974±2,084	1.7%±0.3 pp46,718±7,559	▲ +3.6%	2/50
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category	Ward 33
Insured (Any Coverage)	82.4% ±1.9 pp46,027 ±1,042
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	49.8% ±1.7 pp27,830 ±953
Direct-Purchase Insurance	7.5% ±1.0 pp4,201 ±577
Medicare	9.1% ±0.9 pp5,093 ±529
Medicaid	17.8% ±1.6 pp9,937 ±904
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.1% ±0.3 pp70 ±194
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	2.8% ±0.7 pp1,567 ±396
Uninsured	17.6% ±1.9 pp9,815 ±1,042
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Insured (Any Coverage)	82.4%±1.9 pp46,027±1,042	90.2%±0.2 pp2,424,871±5,689	▼ -7.8%	49/50
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	49.8%±1.7 pp27,830±953	51.2%±0.4 pp1,376,912±9,468	▼ -1.4%	28/50
Direct-Purchase Insurance	7.5%±1.0 pp4,201±577	8.5%±0.2 pp227,424±5,112	▼ -0.9%	28/50
Medicare	9.1%±0.9 pp5,093±529	12.6%±0.2 pp339,804±4,911	▼ -3.5%	43/50
Medicaid	17.8%±1.6 pp9,937±904	22.2%±0.3 pp596,931±7,773	▼ -4.4%	32/50
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.1%±0.3 pp70±194	0.3%±0.0 pp7,201±787	▼ -0.1%	40/50
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	2.8%±0.7 pp1,567±396	3.8%±0.1 pp102,777±3,544	▼ -1.0%	38/50
Uninsured	17.6%±1.9 pp9,815±1,042	9.8%±0.2 pp262,018±5,689	▲ +7.8%	2/50
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category	Ward 33
Adults With at Least One Disability	10.3% ±1.0 pp4,692 ±472
Mobility Disability	4.9% ±0.8 pp2,252 ±354
Hearing Disability	2.5% ±0.6 pp1,142 ±263
Vision Disability	2.0% ±0.6 pp928 ±272
Cognitive Disability	4.0% ±0.7 pp1,844 ±328
Self-Care Disability	1.7% ±0.5 pp765 ±221
Independent Living Disability	3.8% ±0.6 pp1,729 ±291
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability	10.3%±1.0 pp4,692±472	14.0%±0.2 pp303,665±4,797	▼ -3.8%	41/50
Mobility Disability	4.9%±0.8 pp2,252±354	7.6%±0.2 pp163,666±3,398	▼ -2.6%	41/50
Hearing Disability	2.5%±0.6 pp1,142±263	2.8%±0.1 pp61,430±2,337	▼ -0.3%	34/50
Vision Disability	2.0%±0.6 pp928±272	3.0%±0.1 pp64,544±2,269	▼ -1.0%	39/50
Cognitive Disability	4.0%±0.7 pp1,844±328	5.2%±0.1 pp112,824±2,939	▼ -1.2%	36/50
Self-Care Disability	1.7%±0.5 pp765±221	2.7%±0.1 pp57,758±2,261	▼ -1.0%	40/50
Independent Living Disability	3.8%±0.6 pp1,729±291	5.7%±0.2 pp123,651±3,247	▼ -1.9%	42/50
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category	Ward 33
Arthritis	16.4%7,069
High Blood Pressure	24.7%10,631
Cancer	4.4%1,918
Current Asthma	9.1%3,908
Coronary Heart Disease	4.0%1,738
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	4.4%1,913
Diabetes	10.2%4,378
High Cholesterol	31.1%13,415
Obesity	30.0%12,939
Stroke	2.4%1,020
Lost All Natural Teeth	1.3%555
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Arthritis	16.4%7,069	19.6%409,178	▼ -3.2%	40/50
High Blood Pressure	24.7%10,631	29.7%620,030	▼ -5.0%	40/50
Cancer	4.4%1,918	5.0%104,382	▼ -0.6%	34/50
Current Asthma	9.1%3,908	10.2%212,940	▼ -1.1%	38/50
Coronary Heart Disease	4.0%1,738	4.8%100,207	▼ -0.8%	39/50
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	4.4%1,913	5.5%114,820	▼ -1.1%	40/50
Diabetes	10.2%4,378	12.0%250,517	▼ -1.8%	37/50
High Cholesterol	31.1%13,415	31.6%659,696	▼ -0.5%	32/50
Obesity	30.0%12,939	32.6%680,572	▼ -2.6%	32/50
Stroke	2.4%1,020	3.3%68,892	▼ -0.9%	40/50
Lost All Natural Teeth	1.3%555	2.5%52,249	▼ -1.2%	40/50
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category	Ward 33
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	20.5%8,838
Current Cigarette Smoking	11.1%4,774
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	23.8%10,273
Short Sleep Duration	35.6%15,331
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	20.5%8,838	19.0%396,652	▲ +1.5%	15/50
Current Cigarette Smoking	11.1%4,774	11.9%248,430	▼ -0.8%	31/50
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	23.8%10,273	24.7%515,648	▼ -0.9%	29/50
Short Sleep Duration	35.6%15,331	37.8%789,129	▼ -2.2%	33/50
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category	Ward 33
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	19.6%8,453
Frequent Physical Distress	11.2%4,832
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	19.6%8,453	21.1%440,493	▼ -1.5%	29/50
Frequent Physical Distress	11.2%4,832	11.8%246,342	▼ -0.6%	31/50
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category	Ward 33
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	67.3%29,018
Routine Checkup in Past Year	73.4%31,648
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	85.0%36,667
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	52.1%22,476
Dental Visit in Past Year	60.1%25,905
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	73.0%31,489
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	67.3%29,018	72.5%1,513,542	▼ -5.2%	37/50
Routine Checkup in Past Year	73.4%31,648	76.2%1,590,785	▼ -2.8%	38/50
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	85.0%36,667	86.2%1,799,549	▼ -1.2%	34/50
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	52.1%22,476	55.8%1,164,905	▼ -3.7%	34/50
Dental Visit in Past Year	60.1%25,905	58.4%1,219,184	▲ +1.7%	18/50
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	73.0%31,489	74.2%1,549,032	▼ -1.2%	30/50
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category	Ward 33
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	19.1%8,218
Frequent Mental Distress	15.4%6,645
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	27.2%11,708
Loneliness	34.9%15,054
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 33	City	Difference	Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	19.1%8,218	19.1%398,740	0%	25/50
Frequent Mental Distress	15.4%6,645	16.0%334,023	▼ -0.6%	30/50
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	27.2%11,708	28.2%588,716	▼ -1.0%	31/50
Loneliness	34.9%15,054	35.8%747,377	▼ -0.9%	30/50
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Compare All Wards

Chicago City Council Ward 33

Ward 33 at a Glance

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Age Distribution

Educational Attainment

Population

Household Size

Marital Status

Language Spoken at Home

English Proficiency

Household Composition

Children by Household Type

Veteran Status

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Poverty Status

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Occupation

Industry of Employment

Class of Worker

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Earnings of All Workers

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 33

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 33 in Lower-Income Families

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Ward 33

Local Businesses

Jobs in Ward 33

Industry of Jobs in Ward 33

Earnings of Jobs in Ward 33

Jobs in Ward 33 by Firm Age

Jobs in Ward 33 by Firm Size

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

College Enrollment

Student Digital Access

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Year Moved Into Current Home

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Housing Vacancy Status

Housing Age

Housing Units by Building Size

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Overcrowded Housing

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Monthly Housing Costs

Rent

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Home Values

Federal Housing Assistance

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Commute Time

Household Vehicle Access

Where Ward 33 Residents Work

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Ward 33

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Household Internet Access

Health

Health Insurance

Health Insurance Coverage Types