Chicago City Council Ward 34 Demographics, Housing & Census Data

Chicago City Council Ward 34 Census and ACS demographic tables: population, race, age, income, poverty, rent, housing types, single-family homes, commute, education, internet access, health insurance, and disability.

Chicago City Council Ward 34

William Conway
William Conway
Ward 34 Alderperson

Ward 34 at a Glance

Time period?Historical estimates use this profile's current boundaries, held constant across periods; they do not reflect the boundaries that were in effect at the time. Comparing
Values as
Show as
Add to every table
Showing Chart vs. Chicago ± Margin of error

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category Ward 34
Hispanic 11.2% ±1.9 pp6,037 ±1,037
White 51.4% ±2.6 pp27,616 ±1,423
Black 9.1% ±1.3 pp4,891 ±726
Asian 22.6% ±2.5 pp12,147 ±1,327
Other or Multi-racial 5.7% ±1.3 pp3,052 ±681
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Hispanic 11.2%±1.9 pp6,037±1,037 29.7%±0.2 pp805,318±5,785 ▼ -18.5% 37/50
White 51.4%±2.6 pp27,616±1,423 32.1%±0.2 pp870,127±5,557 ▲ +19.3% 13/50
Black 9.1%±1.3 pp4,891±726 27.4%±0.2 pp743,710±6,047 ▼ -18.3% 25/50
Asian 22.6%±2.5 pp12,147±1,327 7.2%±0.2 pp196,435±4,370 ▲ +15.4% 2/50
Other or Multi-racial 5.7%±1.3 pp3,052±681 3.5%±0.1 pp95,636±3,778 ▲ +2.2% 6/50
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Hispanic 7.7% ±1.2 pp3,003 ±453 7.0% ±1.0 pp3,125 ±437 11.2% ±1.9 pp6,037 ±1,037 ▲ +3.5 pp▲ +3,034▲ +4.2 pp▲ +2,912▼ −0.7 pp▲ +122
Chicago citywide 28.9% ±0.2 pp785,292 ±4,750 28.8% ±0.2 pp780,167 ±5,832 29.7% ±0.2 pp805,318 ±5,785 ▲ +0.8 pp▲ +20,026▲ +0.9 pp▲ +25,151▼ −0.2 pp▼ −5,125
White 61.7% ±1.6 pp23,965 ±629 59.7% ±1.8 pp26,524 ±798 51.4% ±2.6 pp27,616 ±1,423 ▼ −10.3 pp▲ +3,651▼ −8.3 pp▲ +1,092▼ −2.0 pp▲ +2,559
Chicago citywide 32.2% ±0.2 pp872,513 ±4,319 33.3% ±0.2 pp901,769 ±4,468 32.1% ±0.2 pp870,127 ±5,557 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2,386▼ −1.2 pp▼ −31,642▲ +1.1 pp▲ +29,256
Black 9.6% ±1.7 pp3,745 ±644 8.9% ±1.1 pp3,967 ±504 9.1% ±1.3 pp4,891 ±726 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +1,146▲ +0.2 pp▲ +924▼ −0.7 pp▲ +222
Chicago citywide 31.5% ±0.1 pp853,214 ±3,755 29.2% ±0.2 pp790,893 ±4,690 27.4% ±0.2 pp743,710 ±6,047 ▼ −4.0 pp▼ −109,504▼ −1.8 pp▼ −47,183▼ −2.3 pp▼ −62,321
Asian 18.4% ±2.0 pp7,166 ±773 20.6% ±1.7 pp9,148 ±736 22.6% ±2.5 pp12,147 ±1,327 ▲ +4.2 pp▲ +4,981▲ +2.0 pp▲ +2,999▲ +2.2 pp▲ +1,982
Chicago citywide 5.7% ±0.1 pp154,287 ±2,942 6.5% ±0.1 pp177,195 ±3,532 7.2% ±0.2 pp196,435 ±4,370 ▲ +1.6 pp▲ +42,148▲ +0.7 pp▲ +19,240▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,908
Other or Multi-racial 2.5% ±0.7 pp967 ±262 3.7% ±0.7 pp1,644 ±324 5.7% ±1.3 pp3,052 ±681 ▲ +3.2 pp▲ +2,085▲ +2.0 pp▲ +1,408▲ +1.2 pp▲ +677
Chicago citywide 1.7% ±0.1 pp47,302 ±1,990 2.2% ±0.1 pp59,510 ±2,584 3.5% ±0.1 pp95,636 ±3,778 ▲ +1.8 pp▲ +48,334▲ +1.3 pp▲ +36,126▲ +0.5 pp▲ +12,208

Age Distribution

Category Ward 34
Under 5 4.1% ±1.0 pp2,177 ±524
5-17 3.3% ±0.6 pp1,755 ±331
18-24 17.1% ±1.7 pp9,178 ±920
25-44 56.6% ±2.6 pp30,417 ±1,392
45-64 13.8% ±1.5 pp7,406 ±789
65-74 3.7% ±0.8 pp1,993 ±405
75-84 1.1% ±0.4 pp612 ±233
85+ 0.4% ±0.3 pp204 ±140
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Under 5 4.1%±1.0 pp2,177±524 5.3%±0.1 pp144,044±3,726 ▼ -1.3% 42/50
5-17 3.3%±0.6 pp1,755±331 14.1%±0.2 pp381,582±5,292 ▼ -10.8% 49/50
18-24 17.1%±1.7 pp9,178±920 9.6%±0.2 pp260,942±4,703 ▲ +7.5% 1/50
25-44 56.6%±2.6 pp30,417±1,392 34.3%±0.2 pp929,946±6,124 ▲ +22.3% 2/50
45-64 13.8%±1.5 pp7,406±789 22.9%±0.2 pp620,047±5,184 ▼ -9.1% 48/50
65-74 3.7%±0.8 pp1,993±405 8.2%±0.1 pp221,932±3,538 ▼ -4.5% 50/50
75-84 1.1%±0.4 pp612±233 4.0%±0.1 pp107,625±2,624 ▼ -2.8% 50/50
85+ 0.4%±0.3 pp204±140 1.7%±0.1 pp45,108±1,900 ▼ -1.3% 50/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category Ward 34
No High School Diploma 1.7% ±0.8 pp715 ±347
High School Diploma or GED 3.5% ±0.9 pp1,442 ±376
Some College or Associate's Degree 8.9% ±1.6 pp3,656 ±674
Bachelor's Degree 43.1% ±3.0 pp17,631 ±1,216
Graduate Degree 42.7% ±3.2 pp17,446 ±1,304
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
No High School Diploma 1.7%±0.8 pp715±347 12.8%±0.2 pp246,015±4,665 ▼ -11.0% 46/50
High School Diploma or GED 3.5%±0.9 pp1,442±376 21.1%±0.3 pp405,248±5,594 ▼ -17.5% 48/50
Some College or Associate's Degree 8.9%±1.6 pp3,656±674 21.8%±0.3 pp419,911±5,261 ▼ -12.9% 46/50
Bachelor's Degree 43.1%±3.0 pp17,631±1,216 25.4%±0.3 pp488,467±5,561 ▲ +17.7% 7/50
Graduate Degree 42.7%±3.2 pp17,446±1,304 19.0%±0.3 pp365,017±4,874 ▲ +23.7% 3/50
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category Ward 34
Total Population 53,742 ±2,419
Total Households 30,980 ±1,499
Population Density 35,091 ±1,579 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 Average Ward Difference
Total Population 53,742 54,206 ▼ −464
Total Households 30,980 23,200 ▲ +7,780
Population Density 35,091 people/sq mi 16,281 people/sq mi ▲ +18,810
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average ward rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large wards. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category 2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19 Difference Rank
Total Population 38,847 ±1,444 44,407 ±1,553 53,742 ±2,419 ▲ +14,895 ±2,817▲ +9,335 ±2,875▲ +5,560 ±2,120 ▼ −15,383▼ −9,759▼ −464 49/5050/5028/50
Average Ward 54,230 54,166 54,206 ▼ −24▲ +40▼ −64
Total Households 19,893 ±602 22,814 ±693 30,980 ±1,499 ▲ +11,087 ±1,616▲ +8,166 ±1,652▲ +2,921 ±918 ▼ −675▲ +1,494▲ +7,780 25/5016/506/50
Average Ward 20,568 21,320 23,200 ▲ +2,631▲ +1,880▲ +751
Population Density (per sq mi) 25,365 ±943 28,995 ±1,014 35,091 ±1,579 ▲ +9,726▲ +6,095▲ +3,630 ▲ +9,449▲ +12,883▲ +18,810 7/506/502/50
Average Ward Density 15,916 16,112 16,281 ▲ +366▲ +169▲ +196

Household Size

Category Ward 34
Average Household Size 1.59±0.09
1-Person Households 56.5% ±3.2 pp17,505 ±976
2-Person Households 33.1% ±2.6 pp10,246 ±813
3-Person Households 7.0% ±1.2 pp2,160 ±384
4+ Person Households 3.5% ±0.9 pp1,070 ±291
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Average Household Size 1.59±0.09 2.29±0.02 ▼ −0.70 48/50
1-Person Households 56.5%±3.2 pp17,505±976 39.7%±0.4 pp460,268±4,301 ▲ +16.8% 4/50
2-Person Households 33.1%±2.6 pp10,246±813 29.5%±0.4 pp342,235±4,195 ▲ +3.6% 10/50
3-Person Households 7.0%±1.2 pp2,160±384 12.9%±0.3 pp149,291±3,231 ▼ -5.9% 47/50
4+ Person Households 3.5%±0.9 pp1,070±291 18.0%±0.3 pp208,411±4,023 ▼ -14.5% 49/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category Ward 34
Never Married 62.7% ±2.6 pp31,636 ±1,316
Married 31.5% ±1.7 pp15,885 ±855
Separated 0.7% ±0.6 pp343 ±294
Divorced 4.1% ±0.9 pp2,071 ±429
Widowed 1.0% ±0.5 pp515 ±232
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Never Married 62.7%±2.6 pp31,636±1,316 49.6%±0.3 pp1,130,286±6,623 ▲ +13.1% 3/50
Married 31.5%±1.7 pp15,885±855 35.5%±0.3 pp807,294±6,077 ▼ -4.0% 31/50
Separated 0.7%±0.6 pp343±294 2.2%±0.1 pp49,430±2,379 ▼ -1.5% 48/50
Divorced 4.1%±0.9 pp2,071±429 7.9%±0.2 pp180,700±3,966 ▼ -3.8% 50/50
Widowed 1.0%±0.5 pp515±232 4.8%±0.1 pp109,357±2,738 ▼ -3.8% 50/50
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category Ward 34
Speak English Only 71.4% ±2.0 pp36,697 ±1,034
Spanish 7.1% ±1.3 pp3,639 ±680
Other Indo-European 6.7% ±1.2 pp3,461 ±633
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese) 6.6% ±1.5 pp3,383 ±758
Other Languages 4.6% ±1.1 pp2,351 ±549
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic 2.0% ±1.0 pp1,048 ±529
Other Asian and Pacific Island 1.6% ±0.5 pp812 ±259
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this ward, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Speak English Only 71.4%±2.0 pp36,697±1,034 64.6%±0.3 pp1,659,069±8,218 ▲ +6.8% 23/50
Spanish 7.1%±1.3 pp3,639±680 23.7%±0.2 pp607,865±6,166 ▼ -16.6% 37/50
Other Indo-European 6.7%±1.2 pp3,461±633 2.4%±0.1 pp61,672±3,192 ▲ +4.3% 5/27
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese) 6.6%±1.5 pp3,383±758 2.0%±0.1 pp52,032±2,783 ▲ +4.6% 3/20
Other Languages 4.6%±1.1 pp2,351±549 1.0%±0.1 pp25,292±2,452 ▲ +3.6% 7/50
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic 2.0%±1.0 pp1,048±529 2.6%±0.1 pp67,932±3,529 ▼ -0.6% 22/30
Other Asian and Pacific Island 1.6%±0.5 pp812±259 0.9%±0.1 pp22,472±2,251 ▲ +0.7% 11/16
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this ward, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show
Category Ward 34
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 95.0% ±2.1 pp95.0%±2.1 pp49,003 ±1,095
Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents age 5+) 5.0% ±1.4 pp5.0%±1.4 pp2,562 ±727
↳ Speaks English Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 3.7% ±1.2 pp75.1%±11.6 pp1,923 ±621
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 1.1% ±0.6 pp21.3%±11.3 pp545 ±328
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 0.2% ±0.4 pp3.7%±7.7 pp94 ±200
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 95.0%±2.1 pp95.0%±2.1 pp49,003±1,095 85.4%±0.5 pp85.4%±0.5 pp2,192,778±11,961 ▲ +9.6%▲ +9.6% 15/50
Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents age 5+) 5.0%±1.4 pp5.0%±1.4 pp2,562±727 14.6%±0.3 pp14.6%±0.3 pp374,404±6,794 ▼ -9.6%▼ -9.6% 36/50
↳ Speaks English Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 3.7%±1.2 pp75.1%±11.6 pp1,923±621 7.1%±0.2 pp48.9%±0.9 pp183,252±4,686 ▼ -3.4%▲ +26.1% 34/505/50
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 1.1%±0.6 pp21.3%±11.3 pp545±328 5.2%±0.2 pp35.6%±0.8 pp133,269±3,923 ▼ -4.1%▼ -14.3% 37/5045/50
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 0.2%±0.4 pp3.7%±7.7 pp94±200 2.3%±0.1 pp15.5%±0.7 pp57,883±2,982 ▼ -2.1%▼ -11.8% 45/5046/50
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category Ward 34
Married-Couple Households 24.1% ±2.1 pp7,463 ±653
Unmarried-Couple Households 11.3% ±2.0 pp3,514 ±634
One-Person Households 56.5% ±4.5 pp17,505 ±1,379
Other Household Types 8.1% ±7.8 pp2,498 ±2,416
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Married-Couple Households 24.1%±2.1 pp7,463±653 30.9%±0.3 pp358,432±3,598 ▼ -6.8% 33/50
Unmarried-Couple Households 11.3%±2.0 pp3,514±634 8.3%±0.2 pp96,220±2,797 ▲ +3.0% 9/50
One-Person Households 56.5%±4.5 pp17,505±1,379 39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,729 ▲ +16.8% 4/50
Other Household Types 8.1%±7.8 pp2,498±2,416 21.1%±0.7 pp245,285±8,514 ▼ -13.1% 49/50
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category Ward 34
Children in Married-Couple Households 85.2% ±7.7 pp2,742 ±248
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 2.0% ±1.8 pp63 ±59
Children in Single-Mother Households 10.3% ±3.6 pp331 ±115
Children in Single-Father Households 2.6% ±2.6 pp83 ±82
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households 85.2%±7.7 pp2,742±248 56.0%±0.8 pp293,542±4,257 ▲ +29.2% 5/50
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 2.0%±1.8 pp63±59 8.8%±0.6 pp45,960±3,208 ▼ -6.8% 48/50
Children in Single-Mother Households 10.3%±3.6 pp331±115 30.6%±0.9 pp160,535±4,521 ▼ -20.4% 45/50
Children in Single-Father Households 2.6%±2.6 pp83±82 4.6%±0.4 pp24,133±2,006 ▼ -2.0% 43/50
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show
Category Ward 34
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 2.4% ±0.8 pp2.4%±0.8 pp1,221 ±420
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 79.2% ±18.9 pp1.9%±0.5 pp967 ±231
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 5.0% ±6.9 pp0.1%±0.2 pp62 ±84
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 4.5% ±8.2 pp0.1%±0.2 pp55 ±100
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 0.6% ±6.0 pp0.0%±0.1 pp7 ±73
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 10.7% ±13.0 pp0.3%±0.3 pp131 ±158
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 2.4%±0.8 pp2.4%±0.8 pp1,221±420 2.8%±0.1 pp2.8%±0.1 pp60,766±2,397 ▼ -0.3%▼ -0.3% 26/50
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 79.2%±18.9 pp1.9%±0.5 pp967±231 26.8%±1.8 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,267±1,067 ▲ +52.4%▲ +1.2% 1/501/50
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 5.0%±6.9 pp0.1%±0.2 pp62±84 12.9%±1.0 pp0.4%±0.0 pp7,830±579 ▼ -7.8%▼ -0.2% 45/5041/50
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 4.5%±8.2 pp0.1%±0.2 pp55±100 28.8%±1.4 pp0.8%±0.0 pp17,525±846 ▼ -24.3%▼ -0.7% 50/5050/50
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 0.6%±6.0 pp0.0%±0.1 pp7±73 4.9%±0.7 pp0.1%±0.0 pp2,995±441 ▼ -4.4%▼ -0.1% 46/5045/50
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 10.7%±13.0 pp0.3%±0.3 pp131±158 26.6%±1.5 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,149±916 ▼ -15.8%▼ -0.5% 49/5047/50
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show
Category Ward 34
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 77.8% ±1.9 pp77.8%±1.9 pp41,786 ±1,013
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 22.2% ±2.1 pp22.2%±2.1 pp11,956 ±1,139
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 8.3% ±1.3 pp37.3%±4.8 pp4,454 ±713
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 14.0% ±1.7 pp62.7%±5.0 pp7,502 ±932
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 77.8%±1.9 pp77.8%±1.9 pp41,786±1,013 79.1%±0.3 pp79.1%±0.3 pp2,144,343±7,926 ▼ -1.3%▼ -1.3% 28/50
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 22.2%±2.1 pp22.2%±2.1 pp11,956±1,139 20.9%±0.3 pp20.9%±0.3 pp566,883±7,968 ▲ +1.3%▲ +1.3% 23/50
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 8.3%±1.3 pp37.3%±4.8 pp4,454±713 10.0%±0.2 pp47.7%±0.5 pp270,551±4,603 ▼ -1.7%▼ -10.5% 27/5039/50
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 14.0%±1.7 pp62.7%±5.0 pp7,502±932 10.9%±0.2 pp52.3%±0.9 pp296,332±6,504 ▲ +3.0%▲ +10.5% 15/5012/50
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show
Category Ward 34
Born in India (of foreign-born residents) 4.8%±1.1 pp21.7%±4.6 pp2,578±605
Born in China / Hong Kong (of foreign-born residents) 4.0%±1.0 pp18.0%±3.9 pp2,138±515
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 1.8%±0.7 pp8.1%±3.0 pp959±366
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 11.4%51.3%6,086
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 Chicago Difference Rank
Born in India (of foreign-born residents) 4.8% ±1.1 pp21.7%±4.6 pp2,578 1.0% ±0.1 pp5.0%28,235 ▲ +3.8%▲ +16.7% 1/502/50
Born in China / Hong Kong (of foreign-born residents) 4.0% ±1.0 pp18.0%±3.9 pp2,138 1.4% ±0.1 pp6.7%38,255 ▲ +2.6%▲ +11.3% 3/504/50
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 1.8% ±0.7 pp8.1%±3.0 pp959 8.2% ±0.2 pp39.3%222,978 ▼ -6.4%▼ -31.3% 34/5041/50
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 11.4%51.3%6,086 ——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show
Category Ward 34
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 12.4% ±1.6 pp55.7%±4.9 pp6,618 ±867
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 4.2% ±0.9 pp18.7%±3.9 pp2,225 ±506
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 3.3% ±0.8 pp14.6%±3.5 pp1,737 ±446
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 2.4% ±0.7 pp10.9%±2.9 pp1,295 ±369
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 12.4%±1.6 pp55.7%±4.9 pp6,618±867 5.9%±0.2 pp1342.7%±137.9 pp159,447±5,557 ▲ +6.5%▼ -1287.0% 3/505/50
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 4.2%±0.9 pp18.7%±3.9 pp2,225±506 4.5%±0.1 pp1026.6%±104.8 pp121,912±4,035 ▼ -0.3%▼ -1007.9% 27/5032/50
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 3.3%±0.8 pp14.6%±3.5 pp1,737±446 4.6%±0.1 pp1042.9%±105.9 pp123,849±3,901 ▼ -1.3%▼ -1028.3% 30/5045/50
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 2.4%±0.7 pp10.9%±2.9 pp1,295±369 6.0%±0.1 pp1361.5%±134.7 pp161,675±3,491 ▼ -3.5%▼ -1350.6% 39/5049/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later 5.4% ±1.4 pp2,164 ±566 10.7% ±1.2 pp4,972 ±577 12.4% ±1.6 pp6,618 ±867 ▲ +7.0 pp▲ +4,454▲ +1.7 pp▲ +1,646▲ +5.3 pp▲ +2,808
Chicago citywide 1.4% ±0.1 pp36,978 ±2,235 3.7% ±0.1 pp99,118 ±3,198 5.9% ±0.2 pp159,447 ±5,568 ▲ +4.5 pp▲ +122,469▲ +2.2 pp▲ +60,329▲ +2.3 pp▲ +62,140
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 6.1% ±0.8 pp2,439 ±336 4.9% ±0.8 pp2,253 ±349 4.2% ±0.9 pp2,225 ±506 ▼ −1.9 pp▼ −214▼ −0.7 pp▼ −28▼ −1.2 pp▼ −186
Chicago citywide 5.9% ±0.1 pp161,331 ±3,896 4.9% ±0.1 pp131,658 ±3,182 4.5% ±0.1 pp121,912 ±4,044 ▼ −1.5 pp▼ −39,419▼ −0.4 pp▼ −9,746▼ −1.1 pp▼ −29,673
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 3.8% ±0.7 pp1,512 ±285 3.6% ±0.7 pp1,685 ±309 3.3% ±0.8 pp1,737 ±446 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +225▼ −0.4 pp▲ +52▼ −0.1 pp▲ +173
Chicago citywide 6.1% ±0.1 pp165,077 ±3,717 5.3% ±0.1 pp142,413 ±3,015 4.6% ±0.1 pp123,849 ±3,911 ▼ −1.5 pp▼ −41,228▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,564▼ −0.8 pp▼ −22,664
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 4.2% ±0.6 pp1,671 ±247 3.0% ±0.6 pp1,384 ±263 2.4% ±0.7 pp1,295 ±369 ▼ −1.7 pp▼ −376▼ −0.6 pp▼ −89▼ −1.2 pp▼ −287
Chicago citywide 7.5% ±0.1 pp204,169 ±3,469 6.9% ±0.1 pp186,050 ±3,114 6.0% ±0.1 pp161,675 ±3,509 ▼ −1.6 pp▼ −42,494▼ −0.9 pp▼ −24,375▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,119
Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category Ward 34
Average Household Income $183,427±$12,952
Per Capita Income $106,196±$7,790
10th Percentile Household Income $22,605±$7,358
25th Percentile Household Income $71,078±$7,799
Median Household Income $134,486±$8,392
75th Percentile Household Income Over $200,000
90th Percentile Household Income Over $200,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $183,427±$12,952 $116,016±$1,263 ▲ +$67,411 6/50
Per Capita Income $106,196±$7,790 $50,086±$581 ▲ +$56,109 5/50
10th Percentile Household Income $22,605±$7,358 $12,933±$271 ▲ +$9,672 11/50
25th Percentile Household Income $71,078±$7,799 $34,575±$649 ▲ +$36,503 3/50
Median Household Income $134,486±$8,392 $77,902±$907 ▲ +$56,584 4/50
75th Percentile Household Income Over $200,000 $144,150±$1,210 ▲ +$55,850+ 1/50
90th Percentile Household Income Over $200,000 Over $200,000 — 1/50
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $152,936 ±5,458 $188,693 ±8,986 $183,427 ±12,952 ▲ +$30,491▼ −$5,266▲ +$35,757
Chicago citywide $95,689 ±910 $111,304 ±1,075 $116,016 ±1,263 ▲ +$20,327▲ +$4,712▲ +$15,615
Average Household Income (nominal dollars) $115,419 ±4,119 $153,785 ±7,324 $183,427 ±12,952 ▲ +$68,009▲ +$29,642▲ +$38,367
Chicago citywide $72,215 ±687 $90,713 ±876 $116,016 ±1,263 ▲ +$43,801▲ +$25,303▲ +$18,498
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $79,861 ±2,168 $97,313 ±4,044 $106,196 ±7,790 ▲ +$26,335▲ +$8,882▲ +$17,453
Chicago citywide $37,927 ±351 $45,525 ±412 $50,086 ±581 ▲ +$12,160▲ +$4,562▲ +$7,598
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars) $60,270 ±1,636 $79,311 ±3,296 $106,196 ±7,790 ▲ +$45,926▲ +$26,885▲ +$19,041
Chicago citywide $28,623 ±265 $37,103 ±336 $50,086 ±581 ▲ +$21,464▲ +$12,984▲ +$8,480
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $14,241 ±2,711 $19,207 ±5,114 $22,605 ±7,358 ▲ +$8,365▲ +$3,398▲ +$4,967
Chicago citywide $11,828 ±190 $13,281 ±277 $12,933 ±271 ▲ +$1,105▼ −$348▲ +$1,453
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $10,747 ±2,046 $15,654 ±4,168 $22,605 ±7,358 ▲ +$11,858▲ +$6,951▲ +$4,907
Chicago citywide $8,927 ±144 $10,824 ±225 $12,933 ±271 ▲ +$4,007▲ +$2,109▲ +$1,898
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $63,952 ±6,127 $76,279 ±6,148 $71,078 ±7,799 ▲ +$7,126▼ −$5,201▲ +$12,327
Chicago citywide $28,727 ±321 $31,597 ±462 $34,575 ±649 ▲ +$5,848▲ +$2,979▲ +$2,869
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $48,264 ±4,624 $62,168 ±5,010 $71,078 ±7,799 ▲ +$22,814▲ +$8,910▲ +$13,904
Chicago citywide $21,680 ±242 $25,751 ±376 $34,575 ±649 ▲ +$12,895▲ +$8,824▲ +$4,071
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $121,499 ±5,097 $143,186 ±6,020 $134,486 ±8,392 ▲ +$12,987▼ −$8,700▲ +$21,687
Chicago citywide $63,379 ±591 $71,469 ±723 $77,902 ±907 ▲ +$14,523▲ +$6,433▲ +$8,090
Median Household Income (nominal dollars) $91,693 ±3,847 $116,697 ±4,907 $134,486 ±8,392 ▲ +$42,793▲ +$17,790▲ +$25,004
Chicago citywide $47,831 ±446 $58,247 ±589 $77,902 ±907 ▲ +$30,071▲ +$19,655▲ +$10,416
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $203,202 ±8,798 $234,340 ±6,637 — ——▲ +$31,137
Chicago citywide $122,019 ±806 $139,501 ±1,057 $144,150 ±1,210 ▲ +$22,131▲ +$4,648▲ +$17,482
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $153,354 ±6,640 $190,987 ±5,410 — ——▲ +$37,634
Chicago citywide $92,086 ±608 $113,694 ±862 $144,150 ±1,210 ▲ +$52,064▲ +$30,456▲ +$21,608
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide $202,601 ±2,442 $235,390 ±1,636 — ——▲ +$32,790
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide $152,899 ±1,843 $191,844 ±1,333 — ——▲ +$38,944

Poverty Status

Category Ward 34
Below Poverty Line 8.9% ±1.5 pp4,783 ±801
Below 200% Poverty Line 15.7% ±2.3 pp8,425 ±1,234
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 6.7% ±1.3 pp3,576 ±719
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Below Poverty Line 8.9%±1.5 pp4,783±801 16.8%±0.4 pp456,194±11,330 ▼ -7.9% 41/50
Below 200% Poverty Line 15.7%±2.3 pp8,425±1,234 33.4%±0.6 pp905,794±16,660 ▼ -17.7% 43/50
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 6.7%±1.3 pp3,576±719 8.3%±0.3 pp226,117±7,649 ▼ -1.7% 28/50
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Category Ward 34
Food Insecurity 9.4%3,905
Housing Insecurity 8.6%3,575
Transportation Barriers 5.7%2,341
Threatened Utility Shutoff 4.8%1,970
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Food Insecurity 9.4%3,905 24.4%509,385 ▼ -15.0% 44/50
Housing Insecurity 8.6%3,575 19.7%411,266 ▼ -11.1% 44/50
Transportation Barriers 5.7%2,341 11.6%242,167 ▼ -5.9% 44/50
Threatened Utility Shutoff 4.8%1,970 11.9%248,430 ▼ -7.1% 44/50
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category Ward 34
In Labor Force 92.1% ±1.7 pp32,040 ±598
↳ Employed 88.6% ±1.9 pp30,848 ±674
↳ Unemployed 3.4% ±1.2 pp1,190 ±411
↳ Unemployment Rate 3.7% ±1.3 pp—
Not in Labor Force 7.9% ±7.5 pp2,759 ±2,609
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
In Labor Force 92.1%±1.7 pp32,040±598 85.6%±0.3 pp1,069,076±3,571 ▲ +6.5% 9/50
↳ Employed 88.6%±1.9 pp30,848±674 79.6%±0.3 pp994,466±4,015 ▲ +9.1% 8/50
↳ Unemployed 3.4%±1.2 pp1,190±411 5.9%±0.2 pp73,968±2,565 ▼ -2.5% 40/50
↳ Unemployment Rate 3.7%±1.3 pp— 6.9%±0.2 pp86,502±3,074 ▼ -3.2% 41/50
Not in Labor Force 7.9%±7.5 pp2,759±2,609 14.4%±1.1 pp180,399±13,145 ▼ -6.5% 42/50
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category Ward 34
Management, Business, Science & Arts 73.8% ±4.4 pp28,791 ±1,734
↳ Management Occupations 17.2% ±2.3 pp6,691 ±913
↳ Business & Financial Operations 17.5% ±2.4 pp6,822 ±917
↳ Computer & Mathematical 10.6% ±1.8 pp4,149 ±701
↳ Architecture & Engineering 2.7% ±0.9 pp1,070 ±360
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 1.8% ±0.8 pp718 ±314
↳ Community & Social Service 0.8% ±0.5 pp322 ±210
↳ Legal Occupations 4.1% ±1.0 pp1,591 ±406
↳ Education, Training & Library 4.2% ±1.0 pp1,653 ±391
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 4.1% ±1.1 pp1,605 ±435
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 9.8% ±2.2 pp3,815 ±864
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 0.9% ±0.5 pp354 ±195
Service 7.7% ±1.8 pp3,008 ±707
↳ Healthcare Support 1.0% ±0.6 pp377 ±252
↳ Protective Service 1.6% ±1.0 pp606 ±397
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 3.1% ±0.9 pp1,198 ±360
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 0.6% ±0.7 pp231 ±266
↳ Personal Care & Service 1.5% ±0.6 pp596 ±249
Sales & Office 15.3% ±2.1 pp5,966 ±807
↳ Sales & Related 9.3% ±1.5 pp3,626 ±600
↳ Office & Administrative Support 6.0% ±1.4 pp2,340 ±545
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 1.0% ±0.5 pp391 ±205
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.0% ±0.2 pp19 ±79
↳ Construction & Extraction 0.3% ±0.3 pp98 ±117
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 0.7% ±0.5 pp274 ±183
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 2.2% ±0.8 pp841 ±295
↳ Production Occupations 0.7% ±0.4 pp274 ±156
↳ Transportation Occupations 1.0% ±0.6 pp409 ±248
↳ Material Moving Occupations 0.4% ±0.3 pp158 ±103
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts 73.8%±4.4 pp28,791±1,734 49.2%±0.4 pp686,743±5,710 ▲ +24.6% 6/50
↳ Management Occupations 17.2%±2.3 pp6,691±913 12.3%±0.3 pp172,182±3,807 ▲ +4.8% 8/50
↳ Business & Financial Operations 17.5%±2.4 pp6,822±917 9.1%±0.2 pp127,081±3,358 ▲ +8.4% 5/50
↳ Computer & Mathematical 10.6%±1.8 pp4,149±701 4.9%±0.2 pp68,921±2,690 ▲ +5.7% 2/50
↳ Architecture & Engineering 2.7%±0.9 pp1,070±360 1.6%±0.1 pp22,779±1,380 ▲ +1.1% 4/50
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 1.8%±0.8 pp718±314 1.4%±0.1 pp19,126±1,340 ▲ +0.5% 14/50
↳ Community & Social Service 0.8%±0.5 pp322±210 1.9%±0.1 pp26,973±1,500 ▼ -1.1% 50/50
↳ Legal Occupations 4.1%±1.0 pp1,591±406 2.3%±0.1 pp31,629±1,814 ▲ +1.8% 6/50
↳ Education, Training & Library 4.2%±1.0 pp1,653±391 6.6%±0.2 pp92,316±2,697 ▼ -2.4% 45/50
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 4.1%±1.1 pp1,605±435 3.1%±0.1 pp43,879±1,786 ▲ +1.0% 11/50
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 9.8%±2.2 pp3,815±864 4.6%±0.2 pp63,551±2,652 ▲ +5.2% 2/50
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 0.9%±0.5 pp354±195 1.3%±0.1 pp18,306±1,387 ▼ -0.4% 38/50
Service 7.7%±1.8 pp3,008±707 16.9%±0.3 pp235,977±4,217 ▼ -9.2% 45/50
↳ Healthcare Support 1.0%±0.6 pp377±252 3.4%±0.2 pp46,792±2,107 ▼ -2.4% 44/50
↳ Protective Service 1.6%±1.0 pp606±397 2.8%±0.1 pp39,146±1,734 ▼ -1.2% 34/50
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 3.1%±0.9 pp1,198±360 5.1%±0.2 pp70,514±2,393 ▼ -2.0% 43/50
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 0.6%±0.7 pp231±266 3.0%±0.1 pp41,783±1,967 ▼ -2.4% 44/50
↳ Personal Care & Service 1.5%±0.6 pp596±249 2.7%±0.1 pp37,742±1,657 ▼ -1.2% 48/50
Sales & Office 15.3%±2.1 pp5,966±807 17.4%±0.3 pp243,580±4,754 ▼ -2.2% 45/50
↳ Sales & Related 9.3%±1.5 pp3,626±600 8.1%±0.2 pp113,073±3,174 ▲ +1.2% 6/50
↳ Office & Administrative Support 6.0%±1.4 pp2,340±545 9.3%±0.3 pp130,507±3,591 ▼ -3.3% 46/50
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 1.0%±0.5 pp391±205 4.6%±0.2 pp64,338±2,929 ▼ -3.6% 46/50
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.0%±0.2 pp19±79 0.1%±0.0 pp1,506±406 ▼ -0.1% 33/50
↳ Construction & Extraction 0.3%±0.3 pp98±117 2.8%±0.1 pp39,432±2,062 ▼ -2.6% 48/50
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 0.7%±0.5 pp274±183 1.7%±0.1 pp23,400±1,722 ▼ -1.0% 40/50
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 2.2%±0.8 pp841±295 11.8%±0.3 pp165,261±3,629 ▼ -9.7% 47/50
↳ Production Occupations 0.7%±0.4 pp274±156 4.2%±0.2 pp57,989±2,275 ▼ -3.5% 47/50
↳ Transportation Occupations 1.0%±0.6 pp409±248 3.9%±0.2 pp54,099±2,118 ▼ -2.8% 46/50
↳ Material Moving Occupations 0.4%±0.3 pp158±103 3.8%±0.2 pp53,173±2,312 ▼ -3.4% 50/50
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category Ward 34
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.1% ±0.2 pp22 ±80
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.1% ±0.2 pp22 ±80
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0% ±0.2 pp0
Construction 2.1% ±1.0 pp838 ±380
Manufacturing 6.1% ±1.3 pp2,366 ±492
Wholesale Trade 1.7% ±0.7 pp658 ±286
Retail Trade 4.3% ±1.0 pp1,695 ±403
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 3.4% ±0.9 pp1,342 ±339
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 3.1% ±0.9 pp1,221 ±339
↳ Utilities 0.3% ±0.3 pp121 ±104
Information 3.1% ±0.9 pp1,216 ±347
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 18.1% ±2.2 pp7,048 ±849
↳ Finance & Insurance 14.9% ±2.0 pp5,799 ±772
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 3.2% ±1.1 pp1,248 ±439
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 27.1% ±2.3 pp10,555 ±912
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 25.0% ±2.3 pp9,748 ±904
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.2% ±0.2 pp60 ±90
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 1.9% ±0.8 pp747 ±293
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 21.4% ±2.5 pp8,341 ±984
↳ Educational Services 8.0% ±1.3 pp3,111 ±518
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 13.4% ±2.3 pp5,230 ±896
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 6.8% ±1.4 pp2,660 ±543
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 2.3% ±0.9 pp904 ±360
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 4.5% ±1.1 pp1,756 ±419
Other Services 2.9% ±1.2 pp1,112 ±454
Public Administration 2.9% ±1.3 pp1,145 ±502
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.1%±0.2 pp22±80 0.2%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.1% 44/50
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.1%±0.2 pp22±80 0.2%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.1% 39/50
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%±0.2 pp0 0.0%±0.0 pp— 0% 23/50
Construction 2.1%±1.0 pp838±380 3.8%±0.2 pp— ▼ -1.6% 37/50
Manufacturing 6.1%±1.3 pp2,366±492 7.7%±0.2 pp— ▼ -1.6% 37/50
Wholesale Trade 1.7%±0.7 pp658±286 2.0%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.3% 32/50
Retail Trade 4.3%±1.0 pp1,695±403 8.2%±0.2 pp— ▼ -3.9% 50/50
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 3.4%±0.9 pp1,342±339 7.1%±0.2 pp— ▼ -3.6% 44/50
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 3.1%±0.9 pp1,221±339 6.5%±0.2 pp— ▼ -3.4% 44/50
↳ Utilities 0.3%±0.3 pp121±104 0.5%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.2% 37/50
Information 3.1%±0.9 pp1,216±347 2.1%±0.1 pp— ▲ +1.0% 7/50
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 18.1%±2.2 pp7,048±849 8.8%±0.2 pp— ▲ +9.3% 1/50
↳ Finance & Insurance 14.9%±2.0 pp5,799±772 6.7%±0.2 pp— ▲ +8.2% 1/50
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 3.2%±1.1 pp1,248±439 2.1%±0.1 pp— ▲ +1.1% 5/50
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 27.1%±2.3 pp10,555±912 18.2%±0.4 pp— ▲ +8.9% 6/50
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 25.0%±2.3 pp9,748±904 13.4%±0.3 pp— ▲ +11.6% 6/50
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.2%±0.2 pp60±90 0.1%±0.0 pp— 0% 17/50
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 1.9%±0.8 pp747±293 4.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -2.7% 50/50
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 21.4%±2.5 pp8,341±984 24.2%±0.4 pp— ▼ -2.8% 34/50
↳ Educational Services 8.0%±1.3 pp3,111±518 10.5%±0.2 pp— ▼ -2.5% 39/50
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 13.4%±2.3 pp5,230±896 13.7%±0.3 pp— ▼ -0.3% 23/50
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 6.8%±1.4 pp2,660±543 9.1%±0.2 pp— ▼ -2.3% 40/50
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 2.3%±0.9 pp904±360 2.2%±0.1 pp— ▲ +0.1% 17/50
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 4.5%±1.1 pp1,756±419 6.9%±0.2 pp— ▼ -2.4% 43/50
Other Services 2.9%±1.2 pp1,112±454 4.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -1.7% 46/50
Public Administration 2.9%±1.3 pp1,145±502 4.0%±0.2 pp— ▼ -1.1% 31/50
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category Ward 34
Private Company Employee 72.2% ±2.3 pp28,167 ±885
Self-Employed 6.4% ±1.2 pp2,478 ±486
Nonprofit 11.8% ±1.8 pp4,595 ±693
Government 9.6% ±1.9 pp3,758 ±751
Unpaid Family Worker 0.0% ±0.2 pp0
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Private Company Employee 72.2%±2.3 pp28,167±885 67.9%±0.4 pp947,845±5,822 ▲ +4.3% 8/50
Self-Employed 6.4%±1.2 pp2,478±486 8.3%±0.2 pp115,690±2,989 ▼ -1.9% 41/50
Nonprofit 11.8%±1.8 pp4,595±693 12.1%±0.3 pp169,124±4,035 ▼ -0.3% 21/50
Government 9.6%±1.9 pp3,758±751 12.9%±0.3 pp179,945±4,021 ▼ -3.3% 35/50
Unpaid Family Worker 0.0%±0.2 pp0 0.2%±0.0 pp2,312±408 ▼ -0.2% 43/50
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category Ward 34
Full-Time, Year-Round 72.2% ±1.7 pp30,743 ±709
Part-Time or Part-Year 27.8% ±2.2 pp11,847 ±928
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round 72.2%±1.7 pp30,743±709 67.0%±0.3 pp1,025,726±3,875 ▲ +5.1% 8/50
Part-Time or Part-Year 27.8%±2.2 pp11,847±928 33.0%±0.3 pp504,210±4,897 ▼ -5.1% 43/50
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category Ward 34
Average FT Earnings $147,573±$7,789
10th Percentile FT Earnings $46,120±$5,025
25th Percentile FT Earnings $76,262±$3,522
Median FT Earnings Over $100,000
75th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000
90th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Average FT Earnings $147,573±$7,789 $96,214±$968 ▲ +$51,359 5/50
10th Percentile FT Earnings $46,120±$5,025 $29,008±$387 ▲ +$17,112 5/50
25th Percentile FT Earnings $76,262±$3,522 $43,011±$345 ▲ +$33,251 2/50
Median FT Earnings Over $100,000 $69,663±$530 ▲ +$30,337+ 1/50
75th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/50
90th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/50
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $126,912 ±4,109 $150,218 ±6,286 $147,573 ±7,789 ▲ +$20,662▼ −$2,645▲ +$23,307
Chicago citywide $83,170 ±714 $91,467 ±682 $96,214 ±968 ▲ +$13,044▲ +$4,747▲ +$8,297
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $95,778 ±3,101 $122,428 ±5,123 $147,573 ±7,789 ▲ +$51,795▲ +$25,145▲ +$26,650
Chicago citywide $62,767 ±539 $74,546 ±556 $96,214 ±968 ▲ +$33,447▲ +$21,669▲ +$11,778
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $48,060 ±3,904 $52,852 ±2,241 $46,120 ±5,025 ▼ −$1,939▼ −$6,732▲ +$4,792
Chicago citywide $24,209 ±243 $26,113 ±152 $29,008 ±387 ▲ +$4,799▲ +$2,895▲ +$1,904
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $36,270 ±2,946 $43,074 ±1,826 $46,120 ±5,025 ▲ +$9,851▲ +$3,046▲ +$6,805
Chicago citywide $18,270 ±183 $21,282 ±124 $29,008 ±387 ▲ +$10,738▲ +$7,726▲ +$3,012
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $71,767 ±2,167 $79,430 ±2,600 $76,262 ±3,522 ▲ +$4,495▼ −$3,168▲ +$7,663
Chicago citywide $37,393 ±278 $39,415 ±229 $43,011 ±345 ▲ +$5,618▲ +$3,597▲ +$2,021
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $54,161 ±1,636 $64,735 ±2,119 $76,262 ±3,522 ▲ +$22,101▲ +$11,527▲ +$10,574
Chicago citywide $28,220 ±210 $32,123 ±187 $43,011 ±345 ▲ +$14,791▲ +$10,888▲ +$3,903
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $104,956 ±3,474 $117,024 ±2,976 — ——▲ +$12,069
Chicago citywide $60,575 ±496 $64,628 ±327 $69,663 ±530 ▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,034▲ +$4,054
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $79,208 ±2,622 $95,375 ±2,426 — ——▲ +$16,167
Chicago citywide $45,715 ±374 $52,672 ±266 $69,663 ±530 ▲ +$23,948▲ +$16,991▲ +$6,957
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide $98,274 ±615 $108,202 ±616 — ——▲ +$9,928
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide $74,166 ±464 $88,185 ±502 — ——▲ +$14,019
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide — — — ———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category Ward 34
Average PT Earnings $56,665±$15,535
10th Percentile PT Earnings $1,773±$475
25th Percentile PT Earnings $5,187±$1,094
Median PT Earnings $17,457±$3,326
75th Percentile PT Earnings $57,602±$7,629
90th Percentile PT Earnings Over $100,000
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Average PT Earnings $56,665±$15,535 $33,575±$750 ▲ +$23,090 5/50
10th Percentile PT Earnings $1,773±$475 $2,183±$87 ▼ −$410 41/50
25th Percentile PT Earnings $5,187±$1,094 $7,222±$206 ▼ −$2,035 44/50
Median PT Earnings $17,457±$3,326 $19,180±$393 ▼ −$1,723 30/50
75th Percentile PT Earnings $57,602±$7,629 $38,498±$681 ▲ +$19,104 8/50
90th Percentile PT Earnings Over $100,000 $73,776±$1,391 ▲ +$26,224+ 1/50
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $32,662 ±2,446 $46,008 ±7,986 $56,665 ±15,535 ▲ +$24,003▲ +$10,658▲ +$13,346
Chicago citywide $27,076 ±473 $31,236 ±676 $33,575 ±750 ▲ +$6,500▲ +$2,340▲ +$4,160
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $24,650 ±1,846 $37,497 ±6,508 $56,665 ±15,535 ▲ +$32,016▲ +$19,169▲ +$12,847
Chicago citywide $20,433 ±357 $25,457 ±551 $33,575 ±750 ▲ +$13,142▲ +$8,118▲ +$5,024
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,493 ±217 $1,600 ±237 $1,773 ±475 ▲ +$280▲ +$173▲ +$107
Chicago citywide $2,230 ±48 $2,283 ±59 $2,183 ±87 ▼ −$47▼ −$100▲ +$53
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $1,127 ±164 $1,304 ±193 $1,773 ±475 ▲ +$646▲ +$469▲ +$177
Chicago citywide $1,683 ±36 $1,861 ±48 $2,183 ±87 ▲ +$500▲ +$322▲ +$178
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $4,014 ±771 $4,407 ±663 $5,187 ±1,094 ▲ +$1,173▲ +$780▲ +$393
Chicago citywide $6,390 ±123 $6,841 ±156 $7,222 ±206 ▲ +$832▲ +$381▲ +$451
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $3,029 ±582 $3,592 ±540 $5,187 ±1,094 ▲ +$2,157▲ +$1,595▲ +$563
Chicago citywide $4,822 ±93 $5,575 ±127 $7,222 ±206 ▲ +$2,399▲ +$1,646▲ +$753
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $13,457 ±1,826 $14,576 ±1,695 $17,457 ±3,326 ▲ +$3,999▲ +$2,881▲ +$1,119
Chicago citywide $15,461 ±166 $17,025 ±275 $19,180 ±393 ▲ +$3,719▲ +$2,155▲ +$1,563
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $10,156 ±1,378 $11,879 ±1,381 $17,457 ±3,326 ▲ +$7,301▲ +$5,577▲ +$1,723
Chicago citywide $11,668 ±125 $13,875 ±224 $19,180 ±393 ▲ +$7,512▲ +$5,305▲ +$2,207
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $40,395 ±5,835 $41,894 ±6,287 $57,602 ±7,629 ▲ +$17,208▲ +$15,709▲ +$1,499
Chicago citywide $30,795 ±619 $34,779 ±505 $38,498 ±681 ▲ +$7,703▲ +$3,719▲ +$3,984
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $30,485 ±4,404 $34,143 ±5,124 $57,602 ±7,629 ▲ +$27,117▲ +$23,459▲ +$3,658
Chicago citywide $23,241 ±468 $28,345 ±412 $38,498 ±681 ▲ +$15,257▲ +$10,153▲ +$5,104
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $85,010 ±9,817 $97,111 ±13,984 — ——▲ +$12,100
Chicago citywide $61,207 ±1,249 $68,040 ±1,298 $73,776 ±1,391 ▲ +$12,570▲ +$5,737▲ +$6,833
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $64,156 ±7,408 $79,145 ±11,397 — ——▲ +$14,989
Chicago citywide $46,192 ±942 $55,452 ±1,058 $73,776 ±1,391 ▲ +$27,585▲ +$18,324▲ +$9,261

Earnings of All Workers

Category Ward 34
Average Earnings $121,773±$6,521
10th Percentile Earnings $9,278±$2,331
25th Percentile Earnings $43,210±$4,475
Median Earnings $91,782±$4,447
75th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000
90th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Average Earnings $121,773±$6,521 $75,571±$768 ▲ +$46,203 5/50
10th Percentile Earnings $9,278±$2,331 $8,529±$272 ▲ +$749 21/50
25th Percentile Earnings $43,210±$4,475 $25,183±$358 ▲ +$18,027 7/50
Median Earnings $91,782±$4,447 $51,367±$471 ▲ +$40,415 3/50
75th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000 $93,324±$598 ▲ +$6,676+ 1/50
90th Percentile Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/50
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $95,960 ±2,134 $121,626 ±4,588 $121,773 ±6,521 ▲ +$25,814▲ +$147▲ +$25,667
Chicago citywide $62,453 ±534 $71,626 ±551 $75,571 ±768 ▲ +$13,118▲ +$3,945▲ +$9,173
Average Earnings (nominal dollars) $72,419 ±1,610 $99,126 ±3,739 $121,773 ±6,521 ▲ +$49,354▲ +$22,648▲ +$26,706
Chicago citywide $47,133 ±403 $58,375 ±449 $75,571 ±768 ▲ +$28,438▲ +$17,196▲ +$11,243
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $4,983 ±993 $6,830 ±1,690 $9,278 ±2,331 ▲ +$4,295▲ +$2,448▲ +$1,847
Chicago citywide $6,858 ±139 $8,358 ±164 $8,529 ±272 ▲ +$1,671▲ +$171▲ +$1,500
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $3,760 ±750 $5,567 ±1,377 $9,278 ±2,331 ▲ +$5,518▲ +$3,712▲ +$1,806
Chicago citywide $5,176 ±105 $6,812 ±134 $8,529 ±272 ▲ +$3,354▲ +$1,717▲ +$1,636
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $24,880 ±3,820 $40,297 ±3,695 $43,210 ±4,475 ▲ +$18,330▲ +$2,913▲ +$15,417
Chicago citywide $19,598 ±241 $23,173 ±290 $25,183 ±358 ▲ +$5,585▲ +$2,010▲ +$3,576
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $18,777 ±2,883 $32,842 ±3,011 $43,210 ±4,475 ▲ +$24,433▲ +$10,367▲ +$14,066
Chicago citywide $14,790 ±182 $18,886 ±236 $25,183 ±358 ▲ +$10,393▲ +$6,297▲ +$4,096
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $78,349 ±3,929 $92,359 ±3,592 $91,782 ±4,447 ▲ +$13,433▼ −$577▲ +$14,010
Chicago citywide $42,365 ±293 $47,195 ±370 $51,367 ±471 ▲ +$9,002▲ +$4,172▲ +$4,830
Median Earnings (nominal dollars) $59,128 ±2,965 $75,272 ±2,927 $91,782 ±4,447 ▲ +$32,653▲ +$16,510▲ +$16,144
Chicago citywide $31,972 ±221 $38,464 ±302 $51,367 ±471 ▲ +$19,395▲ +$12,903▲ +$6,492
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $127,374 ±3,253 — — ———
Chicago citywide $78,784 ±555 $87,853 ±597 $93,324 ±598 ▲ +$14,540▲ +$5,471▲ +$9,069
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $96,127 ±2,455 — — ———
Chicago citywide $59,457 ±418 $71,600 ±486 $93,324 ±598 ▲ +$33,867▲ +$21,723▲ +$12,144
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide $128,659 ±682 — — ———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide $97,097 ±515 — — ———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 34

Category Ward 34
Household income at age 35 $54,188 ±$2,068
Household income percentile rank 48.5 ±1.19 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 21.8% ±1.63 pp
Individual income at age 35 $40,511 ±$1,423
Fraction married 32.5% ±1.87 pp
Employment rate 73.7% ±1.77 pp
Incarceration rate 1.31% ±0.48 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 34. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 34 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Ward 34 City Difference
Household income at age 35 $54,188 ±$2,068 $43,090 ±$102 +$11,099
Household income percentile rank 48.5 ±1.19 pp 40.9 ±0.06 pp +7.6 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 21.8% ±1.63 pp 11.4% ±0.08 pp +10.4 pp
Individual income at age 35 $40,511 ±$1,423 $33,544 ±$80 +$6,967
Fraction married 32.5% ±1.87 pp 26.4% ±0.11 pp +6.2 pp
Employment rate 73.7% ±1.77 pp 74.4% ±0.11 pp −0.7 pp
Incarceration rate 1.31% ±0.48 pp 2.87% ±0.05 pp −1.6 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 34. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 34 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 34 in Lower-Income Families

Category Ward 34
Household income at age 35 $34,408 ±$2,361
Household income percentile rank 35.2 ±1.64 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 6.98% ±1.88 pp
Individual income at age 35 $27,466 ±$1,957
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 34 with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 34 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Ward 34 City Difference
Household income at age 35 $34,408 ±$2,361 $34,711 ±$124 −$303
Household income percentile rank 35.2 ±1.64 pp 35.3 ±0.09 pp −0.1 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 6.98% ±1.88 pp 6.31% ±0.09 pp +0.7 pp
Individual income at age 35 $27,466 ±$1,957 $28,716 ±$106 −$1,250
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 34 with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 34 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Ward 34

Category Ward 34
Stayed in the greater Chicago area 70.0% ±1.74 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 17.9% ±1.69 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 34. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 34 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category Ward 34 City Difference
Stayed in the greater Chicago area 70.0% ±1.74 pp 78.1% ±0.11 pp −8.1 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 17.9% ±1.69 pp 22.9% ±0.11 pp −5.0 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 34. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 34 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Ward 34

Category Ward 34
All jobs located in ward 34 281,551
Ward 34 jobs held by Ward 34 residents 2.0%
Ward 34 jobs held by non-Ward 34 residents 98.0%
Employed residents working in Ward 34 20.3%
Employed residents working outside Ward 34 79.7%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Ward 34 Chicago ward median Difference Rank
All jobs located in ward 34 281,551 11,093 ▲ +270,458 2/50
Ward 34 jobs held by Ward 34 residents 2.0% 6.3% ▼ −4.3 pp 50/50
Ward 34 jobs held by non-Ward 34 residents 98.0% 93.7% ▲ +4.3 pp 1/50
Employed residents working in Ward 34 20.3% 3.2% ▲ +17.1 pp 2/50
Employed residents working outside Ward 34 79.7% 96.8% ▼ −17.1 pp 49/50
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in ward 34 237,068 265,637 281,551 ▲ +44,483▲ +15,914▲ +28,569
Chicago citywide 10,920 11,554 11,093 ▲ +174▼ −460▲ +634
Ward 34 jobs held by Ward 34 residents 1.6%3,627 1.7%4,359 2.0%5,424 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +1,797▲ +0.3 pp▲ +1,065▲ +0.1 pp▲ +732
Chicago citywide 6.4%696 6.4%725 6.3%701 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5▼ −0.1 pp▼ −24– 0.0 pp▲ +29
Ward 34 jobs held by non-Ward 34 residents 98.4%222,297 98.3%246,876 98.0%260,640 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +38,343▼ −0.3 pp▲ +13,764▼ −0.1 pp▲ +24,579
Chicago citywide 93.6%9,244 93.6%9,497 93.7%9,122 ▲ +0.1 pp▼ −122▲ +0.1 pp▼ −375– 0.0 pp▲ +253
Employed residents working in Ward 34 22.1%3,627 19.8%4,359 20.3%5,424 ▼ −1.8 pp▲ +1,797▲ +0.5 pp▲ +1,065▼ −2.3 pp▲ +732
Chicago citywide 3.3%696 3.0%725 3.2%701 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5▲ +0.1 pp▼ −24▼ −0.2 pp▲ +29
Employed residents working outside Ward 34 77.9%12,778 80.2%17,666 79.7%21,343 ▲ +1.8 pp▲ +8,565▼ −0.5 pp▲ +3,677▲ +2.3 pp▲ +4,888
Chicago citywide 96.7%19,233 97.0%20,782 96.8%20,998 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,765▼ −0.1 pp▲ +216▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,549

Industry of Jobs in Ward 34

Category Ward 34
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%55
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%8
Construction 0.9%2,643
Manufacturing 0.6%1,763
Wholesale Trade 1.3%3,785
Retail Trade 1.9%5,443
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 0.7%1,924
↳ Utilities 0.1%168
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 0.6%1,756
Information 4.3%12,099
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 18.9%53,180
↳ Finance & Insurance 17.0%47,891
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.9%5,289
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 24.1%67,878
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 16.0%45,017
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 1.9%5,311
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 6.2%17,550
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 38.6%108,650
↳ Educational Services 25.9%72,846
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 12.7%35,804
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 3.8%10,587
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.8%2,326
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 2.9%8,261
Other Services 3.1%8,700
Public Administration 1.7%4,844
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%55 0.0%423 0% 15/50
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%8 0.0%36 0% 8/50
Construction 0.9%2,643 1.9%27,207 ▼ -0.9% 42/50
Manufacturing 0.6%1,763 4.4%64,747 ▼ -3.8% 45/50
Wholesale Trade 1.3%3,785 2.8%41,460 ▼ -1.5% 33/50
Retail Trade 1.9%5,443 6.6%96,413 ▼ -4.7% 49/50
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 0.7%1,924 6.0%87,845 ▼ -5.3% 40/50
↳ Utilities 0.1%168 0.3%5,012 ▼ -0.3% 9/50
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 0.6%1,756 5.7%82,833 ▼ -5.0% 40/50
Information 4.3%12,099 3.5%51,095 ▲ +0.8% 3/50
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 18.9%53,180 10.8%157,520 ▲ +8.1% 1/50
↳ Finance & Insurance 17.0%47,891 8.6%125,824 ▲ +8.4% 1/50
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.9%5,289 2.2%31,696 ▼ -0.3% 22/50
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 24.1%67,878 23.2%339,220 ▲ +0.9% 3/50
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 16.0%45,017 14.2%207,444 ▲ +1.8% 3/50
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 1.9%5,311 1.2%16,872 ▲ +0.7% 6/50
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 6.2%17,550 7.9%114,904 ▼ -1.6% 22/50
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 38.6%108,650 23.0%336,089 ▲ +15.6% 11/50
↳ Educational Services 25.9%72,846 9.2%134,671 ▲ +16.7% 4/50
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 12.7%35,804 13.8%201,418 ▼ -1.0% 32/50
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 3.8%10,587 10.3%151,055 ▼ -6.6% 48/50
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.8%2,326 1.9%27,339 ▼ -1.0% 23/50
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 2.9%8,261 8.5%123,716 ▼ -5.5% 49/50
Other Services 3.1%8,700 4.0%59,136 ▼ -1.0% 40/50
Public Administration 1.7%4,844 3.5%51,418 ▼ -1.8% 5/50
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%8 0.0%8 0.0%55 – 0.0 pp▲ +47– 0.0 pp▲ +47– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide 0.0%181 0.0%569 0.0%423 – 0.0 pp▲ +242– 0.0 pp▼ −146– 0.0 pp▲ +388
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%6 0.0%4 0.0%8 – 0.0 pp▲ +2– 0.0 pp▲ +4– 0.0 pp▼ −2
Chicago citywide 0.0%140 0.0%374 0.0%36 – 0.0 pp▼ −104– 0.0 pp▼ −338– 0.0 pp▲ +234
Construction 0.8%1,932 1.1%3,053 0.9%2,643 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +711▼ −0.2 pp▼ −410▲ +0.3 pp▲ +1,121
Chicago citywide 1.6%20,789 1.8%26,012 1.9%27,207 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,418– 0.0 pp▲ +1,195▲ +0.3 pp▲ +5,223
Manufacturing 0.6%1,534 0.9%2,429 0.6%1,763 – 0.0 pp▲ +229▼ −0.3 pp▼ −666▲ +0.3 pp▲ +895
Chicago citywide 4.6%61,066 4.5%63,597 4.4%64,747 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,681▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,150▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,531
Wholesale Trade 1.4%3,331 1.7%4,580 1.3%3,785 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +454▼ −0.4 pp▼ −795▲ +0.3 pp▲ +1,249
Chicago citywide 3.0%39,431 2.9%41,789 2.8%41,460 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,029▼ −0.1 pp▼ −329▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,358
Retail Trade 2.5%5,932 2.7%7,210 1.9%5,443 ▼ −0.6 pp▼ −489▼ −0.8 pp▼ −1,767▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,278
Chicago citywide 7.4%97,262 6.9%97,836 6.6%96,413 ▼ −0.8 pp▼ −849▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,423▼ −0.5 pp▲ +574
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 0.4%907 0.5%1,240 0.7%1,924 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +1,017▲ +0.2 pp▲ +684▲ +0.1 pp▲ +333
Chicago citywide 5.4%71,371 5.6%79,303 6.0%87,845 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +16,474▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,542▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,932
Utilities 0.0%75 0.0%83 0.1%168 – 0.0 pp▲ +93– 0.0 pp▲ +85– 0.0 pp▲ +8
Chicago citywide 0.3%4,383 0.3%4,956 0.3%5,012 – 0.0 pp▲ +629– 0.0 pp▲ +56– 0.0 pp▲ +573
Transportation & Warehousing 0.4%832 0.4%1,157 0.6%1,756 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +924▲ +0.2 pp▲ +599▲ +0.1 pp▲ +325
Chicago citywide 5.1%66,988 5.2%74,347 5.7%82,833 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +15,845▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,486▲ +0.1 pp▲ +7,359
Information 2.5%5,929 3.4%8,908 4.3%12,099 ▲ +1.8 pp▲ +6,170▲ +0.9 pp▲ +3,191▲ +0.9 pp▲ +2,979
Chicago citywide 3.1%40,514 3.4%48,135 3.5%51,095 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +10,581▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,960▲ +0.3 pp▲ +7,621
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 19.8%46,950 16.9%44,785 18.9%53,180 ▼ −0.9 pp▲ +6,230▲ +2.0 pp▲ +8,395▼ −2.9 pp▼ −2,165
Chicago citywide 10.5%138,287 10.6%150,163 10.8%157,520 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +19,233▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,357▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,876
Finance & Insurance 17.8%42,249 15.1%40,135 17.0%47,891 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +5,642▲ +1.9 pp▲ +7,756▼ −2.7 pp▼ −2,114
Chicago citywide 8.5%111,307 8.4%119,147 8.6%125,824 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14,517▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,677▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7,840
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 2.0%4,701 1.8%4,650 1.9%5,289 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +588▲ +0.1 pp▲ +639▼ −0.2 pp▼ −51
Chicago citywide 2.1%26,980 2.2%31,016 2.2%31,696 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,716– 0.0 pp▲ +680▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,036
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 25.9%61,484 26.9%71,505 24.1%67,878 ▼ −1.8 pp▲ +6,394▼ −2.8 pp▼ −3,627▲ +1.0 pp▲ +10,021
Chicago citywide 21.2%278,928 22.6%319,744 23.2%339,220 ▲ +2.0 pp▲ +60,292▲ +0.6 pp▲ +19,476▲ +1.3 pp▲ +40,816
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 17.4%41,246 16.7%44,405 16.0%45,017 ▼ −1.4 pp▲ +3,771▼ −0.7 pp▲ +612▼ −0.7 pp▲ +3,159
Chicago citywide 11.8%155,200 12.9%182,462 14.2%207,444 ▲ +2.4 pp▲ +52,244▲ +1.3 pp▲ +24,982▲ +1.1 pp▲ +27,262
Management of Companies & Enterprises 1.8%4,305 2.2%5,746 1.9%5,311 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,006▼ −0.3 pp▼ −435▲ +0.3 pp▲ +1,441
Chicago citywide 1.0%13,619 1.2%16,600 1.2%16,872 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,253– 0.0 pp▲ +272▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,981
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 6.7%15,933 8.0%21,354 6.2%17,550 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +1,617▼ −1.8 pp▼ −3,804▲ +1.3 pp▲ +5,421
Chicago citywide 8.4%110,109 8.5%120,682 7.9%114,904 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +4,795▼ −0.7 pp▼ −5,778▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,573
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 35.9%85,195 35.0%92,853 38.6%108,650 ▲ +2.7 pp▲ +23,455▲ +3.6 pp▲ +15,797▼ −1.0 pp▲ +7,658
Chicago citywide 23.5%308,633 22.1%313,540 23.0%336,089 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +27,456▲ +0.8 pp▲ +22,549▼ −1.4 pp▲ +4,907
Educational Services 28.6%67,838 24.2%64,172 25.9%72,846 ▼ −2.7 pp▲ +5,008▲ +1.7 pp▲ +8,674▼ −4.5 pp▼ −3,666
Chicago citywide 10.1%132,909 9.0%128,169 9.2%134,671 ▼ −0.9 pp▲ +1,762▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,502▼ −1.1 pp▼ −4,740
Health Care & Social Assistance 7.3%17,357 10.8%28,681 12.7%35,804 ▲ +5.4 pp▲ +18,447▲ +1.9 pp▲ +7,123▲ +3.5 pp▲ +11,324
Chicago citywide 13.4%175,724 13.1%185,371 13.8%201,418 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +25,694▲ +0.7 pp▲ +16,047▼ −0.3 pp▲ +9,647
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 4.7%11,027 4.8%12,780 3.8%10,587 ▼ −0.9 pp▼ −440▼ −1.1 pp▼ −2,193▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,753
Chicago citywide 10.9%143,753 11.5%162,749 10.3%151,055 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,302▼ −1.2 pp▼ −11,694▲ +0.5 pp▲ +18,996
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.7%1,571 0.7%1,981 0.8%2,326 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +755▲ +0.1 pp▲ +345▲ +0.1 pp▲ +410
Chicago citywide 1.7%22,179 2.1%30,178 1.9%27,339 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +5,160▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,839▲ +0.4 pp▲ +7,999
Accommodation & Food Services 4.0%9,456 4.1%10,799 2.9%8,261 ▼ −1.1 pp▼ −1,195▼ −1.1 pp▼ −2,538▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,343
Chicago citywide 9.3%121,574 9.4%132,571 8.5%123,716 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +2,142▼ −0.9 pp▼ −8,855▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,997
Other Services 3.2%7,533 3.5%9,302 3.1%8,700 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,167▼ −0.4 pp▼ −602▲ +0.3 pp▲ +1,769
Chicago citywide 4.5%59,098 4.4%61,698 4.0%59,136 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +38▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,562▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,600
Public Administration 2.2%5,306 2.6%6,984 1.7%4,844 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −462▼ −0.9 pp▼ −2,140▲ +0.4 pp▲ +1,678
Chicago citywide 4.2%54,814 3.6%51,684 3.5%51,418 ▼ −0.7 pp▼ −3,396▼ −0.1 pp▼ −266▼ −0.5 pp▼ −3,130

Earnings of Jobs in Ward 34

Category Ward 34
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 10.5%29,684
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 15.3%43,060
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 74.2%208,807
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 10.5%29,684 12.7%185,297 ▼ -2.1% 46/50
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 15.3%43,060 20.5%299,480 ▼ -5.2% 48/50
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 74.2%208,807 66.9%978,851 ▲ +7.3% 3/50
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 21.1%49,967 14.7%39,029 10.5%29,684 ▼ −10.5 pp▼ −20,283▼ −4.1 pp▼ −9,345▼ −6.4 pp▼ −10,938
Chicago citywide 21.3%280,137 16.8%238,135 12.7%185,297 ▼ −8.7 pp▼ −94,840▼ −4.1 pp▼ −52,838▼ −4.5 pp▼ −42,002
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 27.5%65,256 20.9%55,502 15.3%43,060 ▼ −12.2 pp▼ −22,196▼ −5.6 pp▼ −12,442▼ −6.6 pp▼ −9,754
Chicago citywide 30.7%403,250 26.7%378,530 20.5%299,480 ▼ −10.2 pp▼ −103,770▼ −6.3 pp▼ −79,050▼ −4.0 pp▼ −24,720
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 51.4%121,845 64.4%171,106 74.2%208,807 ▲ +22.8 pp▲ +86,962▲ +9.7 pp▲ +37,701▲ +13.0 pp▲ +49,261
Chicago citywide 48.0%630,740 56.5%800,154 66.9%978,851 ▲ +18.9 pp▲ +348,111▲ +10.4 pp▲ +178,697▲ +8.5 pp▲ +169,414

Jobs in Ward 34 by Firm Age

Category Ward 34
Firm age: 0–1 years 2.0%4,196
Firm age: 2–3 years 2.0%4,173
Firm age: 4–5 years 2.0%4,203
Firm age: 6–10 years 6.7%13,930
Firm age: 11 or more years 87.3%181,558
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years 2.0%4,196 2.8%37,293 ▼ -0.8% 40/50
Firm age: 2–3 years 2.0%4,173 2.8%37,154 ▼ -0.8% 38/50
Firm age: 4–5 years 2.0%4,203 3.2%41,869 ▼ -1.2% 41/50
Firm age: 6–10 years 6.7%13,930 7.8%102,354 ▼ -1.1% 36/50
Firm age: 11 or more years 87.3%181,558 83.4%1,098,247 ▲ +3.9% 12/50
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years 1.9%3,173 2.3%4,600 2.0%4,196 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,023▼ −0.3 pp▼ −404▲ +0.4 pp▲ +1,427
Chicago citywide 2.9%33,224 2.6%33,244 2.8%37,293 – 0.0 pp▲ +4,069▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,049▼ −0.2 pp▲ +20
Firm age: 2–3 years 2.7%4,596 2.5%4,903 2.0%4,173 ▼ −0.7 pp▼ −423▼ −0.5 pp▼ −730▼ −0.3 pp▲ +307
Chicago citywide 4.0%46,935 3.3%42,284 2.8%37,154 ▼ −1.2 pp▼ −9,781▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,130▼ −0.7 pp▼ −4,651
Firm age: 4–5 years 2.5%4,238 3.9%7,649 2.0%4,203 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −35▼ −1.8 pp▼ −3,446▲ +1.3 pp▲ +3,411
Chicago citywide 3.7%42,688 3.6%46,058 3.2%41,869 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −819▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,189▼ −0.1 pp▲ +3,370
Firm age: 6–10 years 7.7%12,874 7.1%14,108 6.7%13,930 ▼ −1.0 pp▲ +1,056▼ −0.4 pp▼ −178▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,234
Chicago citywide 8.2%94,955 8.6%109,934 7.8%102,354 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +7,399▼ −0.9 pp▼ −7,580▲ +0.5 pp▲ +14,979
Firm age: 11 or more years 85.2%142,892 84.2%166,919 87.3%181,558 ▲ +2.1 pp▲ +38,666▲ +3.0 pp▲ +14,639▼ −0.9 pp▲ +24,027
Chicago citywide 81.3%946,852 81.8%1,043,037 83.4%1,098,247 ▲ +2.1 pp▲ +151,395▲ +1.6 pp▲ +55,210▲ +0.5 pp▲ +96,185

Jobs in Ward 34 by Firm Size

Category Ward 34
Firm size: 0–19 employees 8.2%16,966
Firm size: 20–49 employees 6.0%12,567
Firm size: 50–249 employees 11.9%24,707
Firm size: 250–499 employees 6.3%13,111
Firm size: 500 or more employees 67.6%140,709
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees 8.2%16,966 12.8%168,975 ▼ -4.7% 47/50
Firm size: 20–49 employees 6.0%12,567 7.3%96,432 ▼ -1.3% 43/50
Firm size: 50–249 employees 11.9%24,707 13.8%181,123 ▼ -1.9% 39/50
Firm size: 250–499 employees 6.3%13,111 5.7%74,787 ▲ +0.6% 18/50
Firm size: 500 or more employees 67.6%140,709 60.4%795,600 ▲ +7.2% 7/50
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees 10.7%18,017 9.4%18,563 8.2%16,966 ▼ −2.6 pp▼ −1,051▼ −1.2 pp▼ −1,597▼ −1.4 pp▲ +546
Chicago citywide 13.9%162,248 13.3%169,949 12.8%168,975 ▼ −1.1 pp▲ +6,727▼ −0.5 pp▼ −974▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,701
Firm size: 20–49 employees 6.8%11,480 6.6%13,034 6.0%12,567 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +1,087▼ −0.5 pp▼ −467▼ −0.3 pp▲ +1,554
Chicago citywide 8.4%97,503 8.2%103,945 7.3%96,432 ▼ −1.0 pp▼ −1,071▼ −0.8 pp▼ −7,513▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,442
Firm size: 50–249 employees 16.3%27,405 14.2%28,210 11.9%24,707 ▼ −4.5 pp▼ −2,698▼ −2.4 pp▼ −3,503▼ −2.1 pp▲ +805
Chicago citywide 15.7%183,275 14.9%189,930 13.8%181,123 ▼ −2.0 pp▼ −2,152▼ −1.1 pp▼ −8,807▼ −0.8 pp▲ +6,655
Firm size: 250–499 employees 7.2%12,038 6.2%12,368 6.3%13,111 ▼ −0.9 pp▲ +1,073▲ +0.1 pp▲ +743▼ −0.9 pp▲ +330
Chicago citywide 6.3%72,992 5.9%74,603 5.7%74,787 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,795▼ −0.2 pp▲ +184▼ −0.4 pp▲ +1,611
Firm size: 500 or more employees 58.9%98,833 63.6%126,004 67.6%140,709 ▲ +8.7 pp▲ +41,876▲ +4.0 pp▲ +14,705▲ +4.7 pp▲ +27,171
Chicago citywide 55.7%648,636 57.8%736,130 60.4%795,600 ▲ +4.7 pp▲ +146,964▲ +2.7 pp▲ +59,470▲ +2.1 pp▲ +87,494

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category Ward 34
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 2.8% ±0.5 pp2.8%±0.5 pp1,420 ±256
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 55.8% ±7.5 pp1.6%±0.2 pp793 ±106
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 44.2% ±10.7 pp1.2%±0.3 pp628 ±152
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 2.8%±0.5 pp2.8%±0.5 pp1,420±256 13.5%±0.2 pp13.5%±0.2 pp365,577±5,480 ▼ -10.7%▼ -10.7% 49/50
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 55.8%±7.5 pp1.6%±0.2 pp793±106 83.0%±0.5 pp11.2%±0.1 pp303,520±1,897 ▼ -27.2%▼ -9.6% 45/5049/50
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 44.2%±10.7 pp1.2%±0.3 pp628±152 17.0%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.1 pp62,057±2,247 ▲ +27.2%▼ -1.0% 6/5043/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category Ward 34
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 18.0% ±1.5 pp18.0%±1.5 pp9,755 ±830
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 46.8% ±4.4 pp8.4%±0.8 pp4,567 ±433
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 53.2% ±5.1 pp9.6%±0.9 pp5,188 ±502
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 61.1% ±4.2 pp11.0%±0.7 pp5,959 ±405
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 38.9% ±5.6 pp7.0%±1.0 pp3,796 ±542
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 18.0%±1.5 pp18.0%±1.5 pp9,755±830 7.4%±0.1 pp7.4%±0.1 pp201,851±4,036 ▲ +10.6%▲ +10.6% 1/50
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 46.8%±4.4 pp8.4%±0.8 pp4,567±433 52.4%±0.7 pp3.9%±0.1 pp105,720±1,511 ▼ -5.6%▲ +4.5% 38/501/50
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 53.2%±5.1 pp9.6%±0.9 pp5,188±502 47.6%±1.2 pp3.5%±0.1 pp96,131±2,437 ▲ +5.6%▲ +6.0% 13/503/50
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 61.1%±4.2 pp11.0%±0.7 pp5,959±405 67.0%±1.0 pp5.0%±0.1 pp135,301±1,945 ▼ -5.9%▲ +6.0% 38/501/50
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 38.9%±5.6 pp7.0%±1.0 pp3,796±542 33.0%±1.2 pp2.5%±0.1 pp66,550±2,459 ▲ +5.9%▲ +4.6% 13/502/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category Ward 34
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 1.0% ±4.3 pp20 ±88
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 12.9% ±5.5 pp714 ±303
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 1.0%±4.3 pp20±88 5.9%±0.5 pp— ▼ -4.9% 45/50
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 12.9%±5.5 pp714±303 5.4%±0.6 pp— ▲ +7.5% 2/50
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category Ward 34
Owner-Occupied Households 35.8% ±2.7 pp11,018 ±822
Renter-Occupied Households 64.2% ±2.6 pp19,786 ±807
Owner-Occupied Residents 38.1% ±2.9 pp18,809 ±1,440
Renter-Occupied Residents 61.9% ±2.9 pp30,537 ±1,419
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Owner-Occupied Households 35.8%±2.7 pp11,018±822 46.0%±0.4 pp534,012±4,939 ▼ -10.3% 39/50
Renter-Occupied Households 64.2%±2.6 pp19,786±807 54.0%±0.4 pp626,193±5,183 ▲ +10.3% 12/50
Owner-Occupied Residents 38.1%±2.9 pp18,809±1,440 51.8%±0.5 pp1,377,219±13,574 ▼ -13.7% 42/50
Renter-Occupied Residents 61.9%±2.9 pp30,537±1,419 48.2%±0.5 pp1,280,665±13,500 ▲ +13.7% 9/50
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category Ward 34
Median Year Moved In 2020±0.6 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later 14.4% ±2.6 pp4,472 ±798
Moved in 2020 to 2022 42.1% ±3.3 pp13,052 ±1,015
Moved in 2010 to 2019 32.8% ±3.3 pp10,171 ±1,026
Moved in 2000 to 2009 6.3% ±1.3 pp1,947 ±412
Moved in 1990 to 1999 3.3% ±1.3 pp1,023 ±389
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 1.0% ±0.6 pp313 ±183
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Median Year Moved In 2020±0.6 yr 2015±1.0 yr ▲ +5 1/50
Moved in 2023 or Later 14.4%±2.6 pp4,472±798 5.9%±0.2 pp68,884±2,742 ▲ +8.5% 1/50
Moved in 2020 to 2022 42.1%±3.3 pp13,052±1,015 24.1%±0.4 pp279,417±5,059 ▲ +18.0% 1/50
Moved in 2010 to 2019 32.8%±3.3 pp10,171±1,026 39.2%±0.5 pp455,125±5,772 ▼ -6.4% 48/50
Moved in 2000 to 2009 6.3%±1.3 pp1,947±412 13.8%±0.3 pp160,353±3,324 ▼ -7.5% 50/50
Moved in 1990 to 1999 3.3%±1.3 pp1,023±389 8.2%±0.2 pp95,243±2,390 ▼ -4.9% 49/50
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 1.0%±0.6 pp313±183 8.7%±0.2 pp101,183±2,362 ▼ -7.7% 50/50
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show
Category Ward 34
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 32.9% ±2.8 pp32.9%±2.8 pp17,369 ±1,465
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers) 16.8% ±2.1 pp51.0%±4.8 pp8,854 ±1,122
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers) 3.6% ±0.8 pp11.1%±2.3 pp1,924 ±437
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 9.6% ±1.6 pp29.2%±4.0 pp5,074 ±823
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 2.9% ±0.9 pp8.7%±2.7 pp1,517 ±485
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 32.9%±2.8 pp32.9%±2.8 pp17,369±1,465 14.0%±0.3 pp14.0%±0.3 pp375,475±8,289 ▲ +18.9%▲ +18.9% 1/50
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers) 16.8%±2.1 pp51.0%±4.8 pp8,854±1,122 9.8%±0.3 pp69.9%±1.0 pp262,365±6,953 ▲ +7.0%▼ -18.9% 4/5049/50
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers) 3.6%±0.8 pp11.1%±2.3 pp1,924±437 0.8%±0.1 pp5.5%±0.4 pp20,552±1,626 ▲ +2.9%▲ +5.6% 1/501/50
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 9.6%±1.6 pp29.2%±4.0 pp5,074±823 2.5%±0.1 pp17.6%±0.7 pp65,936±2,918 ▲ +7.2%▲ +11.7% 2/504/50
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 2.9%±0.9 pp8.7%±2.7 pp1,517±485 1.0%±0.1 pp7.1%±0.8 pp26,622±3,040 ▲ +1.9%▲ +1.6% 1/5019/50
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show
Category Ward 34
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 7.1% ±1.6 pp7.1%±1.6 pp2,369 ±522
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 3.2% ±1.1 pp45.5%±12.4 pp1,077 ±379
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.3% ±0.4 pp4.7%±5.4 pp112 ±129
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.1% ±0.2 pp0.9%±2.3 pp22 ±56
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 3.5% ±1.1 pp48.9%±11.9 pp1,158 ±380
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 5.0% ±1.7 pp5.0%±1.7 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 1.0% ±1.2 pp1.0%±1.2 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 7.1%±1.6 pp7.1%±1.6 pp2,369±522 9.1%±0.2 pp9.1%±0.2 pp116,849±2,682 ▼ -2.0%▼ -2.0% 31/50
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 3.2%±1.1 pp45.5%±12.4 pp1,077±379 2.5%±0.1 pp27.1%±1.4 pp31,723±1,796 ▲ +0.8%▲ +18.3% 12/504/50
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.3%±0.4 pp4.7%±5.4 pp112±129 0.6%±0.1 pp6.0%±0.7 pp7,037±795 ▼ -0.2%▼ -1.3% 33/5026/50
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.1%±0.2 pp0.9%±2.3 pp22±56 0.2%±0.0 pp2.4%±0.5 pp2,831±587 ▼ -0.2%▼ -1.5% 33/5027/50
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 3.5%±1.1 pp48.9%±11.9 pp1,158±380 5.9%±0.3 pp64.4%±2.5 pp75,258±3,387 ▼ -2.4%▼ -15.5% 43/5044/50
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 5.0%±1.7 pp5.0%±1.7 pp— 4.8%±0.3 pp4.8%±0.3 pp— ▲ +0.2%▲ +0.2% 19/50
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 1.0%±1.2 pp1.0%±1.2 pp— 1.3%±0.1 pp1.3%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.3%▼ -0.3% 29/50
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category Ward 34
Median Year Built 2000±2 yr
Pre-1940 18.1% ±2.2 pp6,030 ±735
1940-2009 52.6% ±3.6 pp17,513 ±1,199
2010+ 29.3% ±3.0 pp9,756 ±1,010
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Median Year Built 2000±2 yr 1953±1 yr ▲ +47 yrs 1/50
Pre-1940 18.1%±2.2 pp6,030±735 38.8%±0.4 pp495,715±4,678 ▼ -20.7% 45/50
1940-2009 52.6%±3.6 pp17,513±1,199 54.9%±0.6 pp700,698±7,435 ▼ -2.3% 27/50
2010+ 29.3%±3.0 pp9,756±1,010 6.3%±0.2 pp80,641±2,725 ▲ +23.0% 1/50
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category Ward 34
Population Density 35,091 /sq mi±1,579/sq mi
Single-Family Homes 4.8% ±1.2 pp1,590 ±389
Buildings With 2–4 Units 3.4% ±0.9 pp1,147 ±289
Buildings With 5–19 Units 5.0% ±1.3 pp1,666 ±429
Buildings With 20 or More Units 86.7% ±2.5 pp28,862 ±836
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Population Density 35,091 /sq mi±1,579/sq mi 11,721 /sq mi±26/sq mi ▲ +23,370 /sq mi 2/50
Single-Family Homes 4.8%±1.2 pp1,590±389 29.2%±0.3 pp372,679±3,989 ▼ -24.4% 48/50
Buildings With 2–4 Units 3.4%±0.9 pp1,147±289 27.4%±0.4 pp349,976±4,957 ▼ -24.0% 49/50
Buildings With 5–19 Units 5.0%±1.3 pp1,666±429 16.2%±0.3 pp206,420±4,124 ▼ -11.2% 47/50
Buildings With 20 or More Units 86.7%±2.5 pp28,862±836 27.0%±0.3 pp344,543±4,438 ▲ +59.7% 2/50
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category Ward 34
Studio 17.8% ±3.0 pp5,933 ±1,012
1 Bedroom 38.7% ±3.1 pp12,882 ±1,023
2 Bedrooms 31.9% ±2.6 pp10,621 ±857
3 Bedrooms 8.6% ±1.4 pp2,880 ±455
4 Bedrooms 2.1% ±0.7 pp707 ±249
5 or More Bedrooms 0.8% ±0.5 pp277 ±158
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Studio 17.8%±3.0 pp5,933±1,012 7.5%±0.3 pp95,749±3,205 ▲ +10.3% 5/50
1 Bedroom 38.7%±3.1 pp12,882±1,023 20.1%±0.4 pp257,271±4,939 ▲ +18.5% 3/50
2 Bedrooms 31.9%±2.6 pp10,621±857 33.1%±0.3 pp422,866±4,221 ▼ -1.2% 31/50
3 Bedrooms 8.6%±1.4 pp2,880±455 26.1%±0.3 pp333,682±4,061 ▼ -17.5% 50/50
4 Bedrooms 2.1%±0.7 pp707±249 9.0%±0.2 pp115,453±2,426 ▼ -6.9% 49/50
5 or More Bedrooms 0.8%±0.5 pp277±158 4.1%±0.2 pp52,033±2,072 ▼ -3.2% 48/50
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show
Category Ward 34
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 3.5% ±1.5 pp3.5%±1.5 pp1,083 ±451
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 1.0% ±0.7 pp27.7%±17.1 pp300 ±224
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 2.5% ±1.3 pp72.3%±20.3 pp783 ±394
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 3.5%±1.5 pp3.5%±1.5 pp1,083±451 3.4%±0.2 pp3.4%±0.2 pp39,979±1,996 ▲ +0.1%▲ +0.1% 22/50
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 1.0%±0.7 pp27.7%±17.1 pp300±224 2.0%±0.1 pp58.2%±2.3 pp23,276±1,493 ▼ -1.0%▼ -30.5% 36/5043/50
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 2.5%±1.3 pp72.3%±20.3 pp783±394 1.4%±0.1 pp41.8%±2.6 pp16,703±1,328 ▲ +1.1%▲ +30.5% 7/508/50
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category Ward 34
Natural Gas Heat 49.9% ±3.5 pp15,473 ±1,078
Electric Heat 47.1% ±3.5 pp14,602 ±1,078
Other Heating Source 2.9% ±1.0 pp905 ±303
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Natural Gas Heat 49.9%±3.5 pp15,473±1,078 77.5%±0.3 pp899,660±3,501 ▼ -27.6% 48/50
Electric Heat 47.1%±3.5 pp14,602±1,078 18.0%±0.3 pp208,937±3,864 ▲ +29.1% 3/50
Other Heating Source 2.9%±1.0 pp905±303 4.4%±0.2 pp51,603±2,173 ▼ -1.5% 38/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show
Category Ward 34
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 42.8% ±3.0 pp13,269 ±944
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 24.3% ±3.0 pp7,534 ±920
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 32.9% ±3.4 pp10,177 ±1,044
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 16.0% ±2.7 pp4,961 ±848
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 42.8%±3.0 pp13,269±944 24.9%±0.4 pp289,047±4,524 ▲ +17.9% 14/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 24.3%±3.0 pp7,534±920 23.8%±0.4 pp276,514±4,291 ▲ +0.5% 14/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 32.9%±3.4 pp10,177±1,044 45.6%±0.5 pp529,378±5,291 ▼ -12.8% 41/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 16.0%±2.7 pp4,961±848 24.0%±0.4 pp278,684±4,167 ▼ -8.0% 35/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category Ward 34
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,299±$181
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,995±$70
Median Monthly Housing Costs $2,429±$44
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,299±$181 $594±$11 ▲ +$705 2/50
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,995±$70 $1,011±$8 ▲ +$984 2/50
Median Monthly Housing Costs $2,429±$44 $1,560±$10 ▲ +$869 3/50
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000 $2,329±$13 ▲ +$671+ 1/50
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000 Over $3,000 — 1/50
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,091 ±100 $1,270 ±82 $1,299 ±181 ▲ +$207▲ +$29▲ +$179
Chicago citywide $609 ±7 $606 ±7 $594 ±11 ▼ −$15▼ −$12▼ −$2
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $824 ±75 $1,035 ±67 $1,299 ±181 ▲ +$475▲ +$264▲ +$212
Chicago citywide $459 ±6 $494 ±6 $594 ±11 ▲ +$135▲ +$100▲ +$35
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,796 ±62 $1,972 ±41 $1,995 ±70 ▲ +$199▲ +$23▲ +$176
Chicago citywide $992 ±5 $1,001 ±5 $1,011 ±8 ▲ +$19▲ +$10▲ +$9
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,355 ±47 $1,607 ±33 $1,995 ±70 ▲ +$640▲ +$388▲ +$252
Chicago citywide $748 ±3 $816 ±4 $1,011 ±8 ▲ +$262▲ +$195▲ +$67
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,449 ±40 $2,592 ±46 $2,429 ±44 ▼ −$19▼ −$163▲ +$144
Chicago citywide $1,493 ±8 $1,523 ±6 $1,560 ±10 ▲ +$67▲ +$37▲ +$29
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,848 ±30 $2,113 ±37 $2,429 ±44 ▲ +$581▲ +$316▲ +$265
Chicago citywide $1,127 ±6 $1,241 ±5 $1,560 ±10 ▲ +$433▲ +$319▲ +$114
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $3,326 ±63 — ———
Chicago citywide $2,333 ±12 $2,326 ±10 $2,329 ±13 ▼ −$4▲ +$3▼ −$7
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) — $2,711 ±51 — ———
Chicago citywide $1,761 ±9 $1,896 ±8 $2,329 ±13 ▲ +$569▲ +$434▲ +$135
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide — $3,316 ±20 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide — $2,703 ±16 — ———

Rent

Rent measure
Category Ward 34
Average Rent Plus Utilities $2,510±$40
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,562±$154
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,046±$54
Median Rent Plus Utilities $2,399±$52
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,916±$71
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities Over $3,500
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities $2,510±$40 $1,613±$12 ▲ +$898 2/50
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,562±$154 $696±$20 ▲ +$866 2/50
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,046±$54 $1,043±$8 ▲ +$1,003 2/50
Median Rent Plus Utilities $2,399±$52 $1,440±$10 ▲ +$959 2/50
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,916±$71 $2,021±$21 ▲ +$894 3/50
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities Over $3,500 $2,738±$29 ▲ +$762+ 1/50
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34
Average Rent $2,408±$39
10th Percentile Rent $1,528±$209
25th Percentile Rent $1,964±$75
Median Rent $2,319±$41
75th Percentile Rent $2,828±$82
90th Percentile Rent Over $3,500
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Average Rent $2,408±$39 $1,452±$11 ▲ +$956 2/50
10th Percentile Rent $1,528±$209 $564±$21 ▲ +$963 2/50
25th Percentile Rent $1,964±$75 $913±$7 ▲ +$1,051 2/50
Median Rent $2,319±$41 $1,262±$12 ▲ +$1,057 2/50
75th Percentile Rent $2,828±$82 $1,868±$13 ▲ +$960 3/50
90th Percentile Rent Over $3,500 $2,528±$38 ▲ +$972+ 1/50
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category Ward 34
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,577±$202
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,974±$140
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,395±$137
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,988±$140
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,968±$237
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,577±$202 $2,734±$24 ▲ +$844 7/50
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,974±$140 $1,270±$14 ▲ +$704 4/50
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,395±$137 $1,697±$14 ▲ +$697 8/50
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,988±$140 $2,339±$17 ▲ +$649 9/50
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,968±$237 $3,269±$31 ▲ +$699 10/50
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000 Over $4,000 — 1/50
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,333 ±52 $3,568 ±126 $3,577 ±202 ▲ +$244▲ +$9▲ +$234
Chicago citywide $2,855 ±19 $2,793 ±23 $2,734 ±24 ▼ −$121▼ −$60▼ −$61
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,516 ±40 $2,908 ±102 $3,577 ±202 ▲ +$1,062▲ +$669▲ +$392
Chicago citywide $2,154 ±14 $2,277 ±19 $2,734 ±24 ▲ +$579▲ +$457▲ +$122
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,056 ±70 $1,947 ±72 $1,974 ±140 ▼ −$82▲ +$27▼ −$108
Chicago citywide $1,403 ±11 $1,356 ±11 $1,270 ±14 ▼ −$133▼ −$86▼ −$47
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,552 ±53 $1,587 ±58 $1,974 ±140 ▲ +$423▲ +$387▲ +$36
Chicago citywide $1,059 ±8 $1,105 ±9 $1,270 ±14 ▲ +$212▲ +$165▲ +$46
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,522 ±89 $2,406 ±96 $2,395 ±137 ▼ −$127▼ −$11▼ −$116
Chicago citywide $1,874 ±12 $1,800 ±12 $1,697 ±14 ▼ −$177▼ −$103▼ −$74
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,903 ±67 $1,961 ±78 $2,395 ±137 ▲ +$491▲ +$434▲ +$58
Chicago citywide $1,414 ±9 $1,467 ±10 $1,697 ±14 ▲ +$283▲ +$230▲ +$53
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,169 ±77 $3,192 ±114 $2,988 ±140 ▼ −$181▼ −$204▲ +$23
Chicago citywide $2,526 ±13 $2,422 ±13 $2,339 ±17 ▼ −$187▼ −$83▼ −$103
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,392 ±58 $2,601 ±93 $2,988 ±140 ▲ +$596▲ +$386▲ +$210
Chicago citywide $1,906 ±10 $1,974 ±11 $2,339 ±17 ▲ +$433▲ +$365▲ +$68
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,938 ±64 $4,138 ±141 $3,968 ±237 ▲ +$30▼ −$171▲ +$200
Chicago citywide $3,447 ±25 $3,343 ±25 $3,269 ±31 ▼ −$178▼ −$74▼ −$104
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,972 ±48 $3,373 ±115 $3,968 ±237 ▲ +$996▲ +$595▲ +$401
Chicago citywide $2,601 ±19 $2,724 ±20 $3,269 ±31 ▲ +$668▲ +$544▲ +$123
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide — $4,578 ±59 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide — $3,731 ±48 — ———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category Ward 34
Average Monthly Owner Costs $1,737±$478
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $486±$244
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,004±$137
Median Monthly Owner Costs $1,498±$142
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs Over $1,500
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs Over $1,500
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs $1,737±$478 $1,078±$22 ▲ +$659 5/50
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $486±$244 $418±$8 ▲ +$67 18/50
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,004±$137 $601±$8 ▲ +$403 6/50
Median Monthly Owner Costs $1,498±$142 $859±$10 ▲ +$639 6/50
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs Over $1,500 $1,197±$18 ▲ +$303+ 1/50
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs Over $1,500 Over $1,500 — 1/50
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,481 ±22 $1,804 ±316 $1,737 ±478 ▲ +$256▼ −$68▲ +$324
Chicago citywide $957 ±15 $1,028 ±10 $1,078 ±22 ▲ +$121▲ +$50▲ +$71
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $1,117 ±17 $1,470 ±258 $1,737 ±478 ▲ +$619▲ +$266▲ +$353
Chicago citywide $722 ±11 $838 ±8 $1,078 ±22 ▲ +$355▲ +$240▲ +$116
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $793 ±154 $862 ±240 $486 ±244 ▼ −$307▼ −$376▲ +$69
Chicago citywide $429 ±6 $469 ±7 $418 ±8 ▼ −$11▼ −$51▲ +$40
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $598 ±116 $702 ±195 $486 ±244 ▼ −$113▼ −$217▲ +$104
Chicago citywide $324 ±5 $382 ±5 $418 ±8 ▲ +$95▲ +$36▲ +$59
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $917 ±45 $1,097 ±90 $1,004 ±137 ▲ +$86▼ −$93▲ +$179
Chicago citywide $586 ±6 $629 ±6 $601 ±8 ▲ +$14▼ −$28▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $692 ±34 $894 ±73 $1,004 ±137 ▲ +$311▲ +$110▲ +$202
Chicago citywide $442 ±4 $513 ±5 $601 ±8 ▲ +$158▲ +$88▲ +$70
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $1,437 ±136 $1,498 ±142 —▲ +$61—
Chicago citywide $815 ±9 $860 ±7 $859 ±10 ▲ +$44▼ −$1▲ +$45
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — $1,171 ±111 $1,498 ±142 —▲ +$327—
Chicago citywide $615 ±7 $701 ±6 $859 ±10 ▲ +$244▲ +$158▲ +$86
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide — $1,206 ±14 $1,197 ±18 —▼ −$9—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide — $983 ±12 $1,197 ±18 —▲ +$214—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide — $1,767 ±35 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — — — ———
Chicago citywide — $1,440 ±28 — ———

Home Values

Category Ward 34
Average Home Value $590,581±$49,315
10th Percentile Home Value $258,331±$32,487
25th Percentile Home Value $345,571±$19,445
Median Home Value $466,895±$24,425
75th Percentile Home Value $683,262±$39,925
90th Percentile Home Value $1,035,816±$168,809
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Average Home Value $590,581±$49,315 $437,638±$7,358 ▲ +$152,943 8/50
10th Percentile Home Value $258,331±$32,487 $129,150±$3,756 ▲ +$129,181 5/50
25th Percentile Home Value $345,571±$19,445 $217,800±$1,804 ▲ +$127,771 7/50
Median Home Value $466,895±$24,425 $334,100±$2,424 ▲ +$132,795 9/50
75th Percentile Home Value $683,262±$39,925 $497,700±$3,730 ▲ +$185,562 9/50
90th Percentile Home Value $1,035,816±$168,809 $809,159±$15,691 ▲ +$226,657 8/50
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $496,590 ±26,903 $617,124 ±36,483 $590,581 ±49,315 ▲ +$93,991▼ −$26,543▲ +$120,535
Chicago citywide $386,614 ±5,106 $424,380 ±4,754 $437,638 ±7,358 ▲ +$51,024▲ +$13,258▲ +$37,766
Average Home Value (nominal dollars) $374,768 ±20,303 $502,957 ±29,734 $590,581 ±49,315 ▲ +$215,813▲ +$87,624▲ +$128,189
Chicago citywide $291,771 ±3,853 $345,871 ±3,874 $437,638 ±7,358 ▲ +$145,867▲ +$91,768▲ +$54,099
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $269,087 ±16,677 $294,121 ±14,558 $258,331 ±32,487 ▼ −$10,756▼ −$35,790▲ +$25,034
Chicago citywide $115,330 ±1,421 $124,313 ±1,339 $129,150 ±3,756 ▲ +$13,821▲ +$4,838▲ +$8,983
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $203,076 ±12,586 $239,709 ±11,865 $258,331 ±32,487 ▲ +$55,255▲ +$18,622▲ +$36,633
Chicago citywide $87,037 ±1,072 $101,315 ±1,091 $129,150 ±3,756 ▲ +$42,113▲ +$27,835▲ +$14,278
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $345,941 ±10,164 $373,844 ±12,878 $345,571 ±19,445 ▼ −$371▼ −$28,274▲ +$27,903
Chicago citywide $190,543 ±2,400 $199,018 ±1,255 $217,800 ±1,804 ▲ +$27,257▲ +$18,782▲ +$8,475
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $261,076 ±7,671 $304,684 ±10,496 $345,571 ±19,445 ▲ +$84,494▲ +$40,887▲ +$43,607
Chicago citywide $143,800 ±1,811 $162,200 ±1,023 $217,800 ±1,804 ▲ +$74,000▲ +$55,600▲ +$18,400
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $442,096 ±10,462 $486,541 ±14,764 $466,895 ±24,425 ▲ +$24,799▼ −$19,646▲ +$44,445
Chicago citywide $299,066 ±2,120 $316,564 ±2,118 $334,100 ±2,424 ▲ +$35,034▲ +$17,536▲ +$17,498
Median Home Value (nominal dollars) $333,643 ±7,895 $396,531 ±12,032 $466,895 ±24,425 ▲ +$133,252▲ +$70,364▲ +$62,889
Chicago citywide $225,700 ±1,600 $258,000 ±1,726 $334,100 ±2,424 ▲ +$108,400▲ +$76,100▲ +$32,300
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $561,553 ±27,042 $715,413 ±52,361 $683,262 ±39,925 ▲ +$121,709▼ −$32,151▲ +$153,860
Chicago citywide $466,951 ±3,138 $490,797 ±3,892 $497,700 ±3,730 ▲ +$30,749▲ +$6,903▲ +$23,846
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $423,795 ±20,408 $583,063 ±42,675 $683,262 ±39,925 ▲ +$259,467▲ +$100,199▲ +$159,268
Chicago citywide $352,400 ±2,368 $400,000 ±3,172 $497,700 ±3,730 ▲ +$145,300▲ +$97,700▲ +$47,600
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $838,075 ±36,883 $1,106,988 ±69,666 $1,035,816 ±168,809 ▲ +$197,741▼ −$71,171▲ +$268,912
Chicago citywide $739,174 ±12,945 $835,769 ±9,047 $809,159 ±15,691 ▲ +$69,986▼ −$26,610▲ +$96,595
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $632,482 ±27,835 $902,196 ±56,778 $1,035,816 ±168,809 ▲ +$403,334▲ +$133,620▲ +$269,715
Chicago citywide $557,842 ±9,770 $681,153 ±7,373 $809,159 ±15,691 ▲ +$251,317▲ +$128,006▲ +$123,311

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show
Category Ward 34
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 3.1%3.1%1,029
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 1.4%46.8%482
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.1%2.1%22
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 1.5%48.3%497
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.1%2.6%27
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 3.1%3.1%1,029 8.3%8.3%106,578 ▼ -5.3%▼ -5.3% 36/50
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 1.4%46.8%482 4.8%57.2%60,910 ▼ -3.3%▼ -10.3% 35/5038/50
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.1%2.1%22 1.1%13.8%14,721 ▼ -1.1%▼ -11.7% 41/5042/50
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 1.5%48.3%497 2.1%25.7%27,383 ▼ -0.7%▲ +22.6% 20/503/50
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.1%2.6%27 0.3%3.3%3,564 ▼ -0.2%▼ -0.7% 26/5019/50
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units 3.9%885 3.1%832 3.1%1,029 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +144▼ −0.1 pp▲ +197▼ −0.8 pp▼ −53
Chicago citywide 8.8%104,550 8.5%103,479 8.3%106,578 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,028▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,099▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,071
Housing Choice Vouchers 0.6%126 1.0%268 1.4%482 ▲ +0.9 pp▲ +356▲ +0.4 pp▲ +214▲ +0.5 pp▲ +142
Chicago citywide 4.3%51,601 4.6%55,987 4.8%60,910 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +9,309▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,923▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,386
Public Housing 0.6%139 0.1%20 0.1%22 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −117– 0.0 pp▲ +2▼ −0.5 pp▼ −119
Chicago citywide 1.8%21,159 1.3%16,094 1.2%14,721 ▼ −0.6 pp▼ −6,438▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,373▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,065
Project-Based Section 8 2.6%582 2.0%517 1.5%497 ▼ −1.1 pp▼ −85▼ −0.5 pp▼ −20▼ −0.6 pp▼ −65
Chicago citywide 2.2%25,940 2.2%26,951 2.1%27,383 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,443▼ −0.1 pp▲ +432– 0.0 pp▲ +1,011
Other Project-Based Programs 0.2%39 0.1%27 0.1%27 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −12– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.1 pp▼ −12
Chicago citywide 0.5%5,850 0.4%4,447 0.3%3,564 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,286▼ −0.1 pp▼ −883▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,403
Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category Ward 34
Average Household Income $17,033
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $408
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,655
Below 30% of Area Median Income 84.0%779
With Children 10.8%100
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 29.5%274
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this ward. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this ward. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this ward.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $17,033 $17,032 ▲ +$1 27/50
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $408 $425 ▼ -$17 36/50
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,655 $1,389 ▲ +$266 4/50
Below 30% of Area Median Income 84.0%779 83.0%77,427 ▲ +1.0 pp 16/50
With Children 10.8%100 31.0%28,919 ▼ -20.2 pp 47/50
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 29.5%274 32.0%29,852 ▼ -2.5 pp 38/50
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this ward. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this ward. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this ward.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income $13,061 $13,234 $17,020 ▲ +$3,959▲ +$3,786▲ +$173
Chicago citywide $12,156 $13,665 $17,032 ▲ +$4,876▲ +$3,367▲ +$1,509
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $301 $307 $408 ▲ +$107▲ +$100▲ +$7
Chicago citywide $310 $340 $425 ▲ +$115▲ +$85▲ +$30
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,103 $1,264 $1,655 ▲ +$552▲ +$391▲ +$161
Chicago citywide $916 $1,017 $1,389 ▲ +$473▲ +$372▲ +$101
Below 30% of Area Median Income 74.1%— 83.4%— 84.0%— ▲ +9.9 pp—▲ +0.6 pp—▲ +9.3 pp—
Chicago citywide 80.0%— 81.0%— 83.0%— ▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +2.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children — — 10.8%— ——————
Chicago citywide — — 31.0%— ——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 27.8%— 29.1%— 29.5%— ▲ +1.7 pp—▲ +0.4 pp—▲ +1.3 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category Ward 34
Total Tree Canopy 13.2%204 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 79.3%1,226 acres
Natural Open Surfaces 7.5%116 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Total Tree Canopy 13.2%204 acres 18.4%25,934 acres ▼ -5.2% 38/50
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 79.3%1,226 acres 60.2%84,955 acres ▲ +19.1% 1/50
Natural Open Surfaces 7.5%116 acres 21.5%30,331 acres ▼ -13.9% 48/50
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category Ward 34
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 29.1% ±4.6 pp15,618 ±2,494
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 53.1% ±4.7 pp28,540 ±2,538
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 17.8% ±3.6 pp9,584 ±1,961
Homes Without Air Conditioning 2.4%1,285
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 29.1%±4.6 pp15,618±2,494 26.1%±0.5 pp708,175±13,883 ▲ +2.9% 14/50
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 53.1%±4.7 pp28,540±2,538 44.1%±0.6 pp1,195,501±15,477 ▲ +9.0% 1/50
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 17.8%±3.6 pp9,584±1,961 29.8%±0.5 pp807,550±13,776 ▼ -12.0% 47/50
Homes Without Air Conditioning 2.4%1,285 4.2%114,618 ▼ -1.8% 43/50
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category Ward 34
Drove Alone 31.7% ±3.0 pp8,450 ±809
Carpooled 2.5% ±1.3 pp667 ±356
Public Transit 18.6% ±2.6 pp4,968 ±691
Walked 42.1% ±3.8 pp11,226 ±1,012
Bikes 2.8% ±1.4 pp742 ±374
Other Commute Mode 1.3% ±0.6 pp336 ±164
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Drove Alone 31.7%±3.0 pp8,450±809 56.6%±0.4 pp772,696±5,998 ▼ -25.0% 47/50
Carpooled 2.5%±1.3 pp667±356 9.3%±0.3 pp126,918±3,980 ▼ -6.8% 49/50
Public Transit 18.6%±2.6 pp4,968±691 22.4%±0.4 pp305,691±6,011 ▼ -3.8% 28/50
Walked 42.1%±3.8 pp11,226±1,012 7.3%±0.3 pp100,269±3,456 ▲ +34.7% 2/50
Bikes 2.8%±1.4 pp742±374 1.8%±0.1 pp24,441±1,693 ▲ +1.0% 13/50
Other Commute Mode 1.3%±0.6 pp336±164 2.5%±0.1 pp34,356±1,772 ▼ -1.3% 28/50
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category Ward 34
Average Commute Time (minutes) 24 min±1.2 min
Less Than 15 Minutes 24.7% ±2.6 pp6,514 ±695
15–29 Minutes 43.2% ±4.1 pp11,391 ±1,079
30–44 Minutes 18.6% ±2.2 pp4,910 ±576
45–59 Minutes 5.7% ±1.4 pp1,513 ±367
60 Minutes or More 7.7% ±2.0 pp2,040 ±527
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes) 24 min±1.2 min 33 min±0.2 min ▼ −9 min 50/50
Less Than 15 Minutes 24.7%±2.6 pp6,514±695 13.0%±0.3 pp140,252±3,438 ▲ +11.7% 1/50
15–29 Minutes 43.2%±4.1 pp11,391±1,079 29.9%±0.5 pp322,586±5,056 ▲ +13.3% 3/50
30–44 Minutes 18.6%±2.2 pp4,910±576 29.6%±0.4 pp318,782±4,584 ▼ -11.0% 49/50
45–59 Minutes 5.7%±1.4 pp1,513±367 14.0%±0.3 pp151,451±3,075 ▼ -8.3% 48/50
60 Minutes or More 7.7%±2.0 pp2,040±527 13.4%±0.3 pp144,940±3,715 ▼ -5.7% 47/50
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category Ward 34
Average Vehicles per Household 0.69±0.04
Households With No Vehicle 40.0% ±3.2 pp12,383 ±997
Households With 1 Vehicle 52.4% ±2.7 pp16,224 ±834
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 7.7% ±1.3 pp2,373 ±400
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Average Vehicles per Household 0.69±0.04 1.12±0.01 ▼ −0.43 46/50
Households With No Vehicle 40.0%±3.2 pp12,383±997 26.6%±0.4 pp308,497±5,087 ▲ +13.4% 8/50
Households With 1 Vehicle 52.4%±2.7 pp16,224±834 45.2%±0.4 pp524,900±5,145 ▲ +7.1% 6/50
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 7.7%±1.3 pp2,373±400 28.2%±0.4 pp326,808±4,200 ▼ -20.5% 49/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Ward 34 Residents Work

Category Ward 34
Loop 33.8%9,476
Near West Side 14.7%4,113
Near North Side 11.2%3,153
Hyde Park 2.3%654
West Town 1.5%427
All other city neighborhoods 10.5%2,954
Outside the city 26.0%7,293
↳ Evanston city, IL 1.1%300
↳ Skokie village, IL 0.9%253
↳ Schaumburg village, IL 0.8%221
↳ Oak Brook village, IL 0.8%212
↳ Maywood village, IL 0.7%190
↳ All other Illinois locations 19.4%5,458
Out of state 2.3%659
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for ward 34 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Ward 34 City Difference
Loop 33.8%9,476 21.5%259,168 ▲ +12.2%
Near West Side 14.7%4,113 6.7%80,119 ▲ +8.0%
Near North Side 11.2%3,153 9.1%109,334 ▲ +2.2%
Hyde Park 2.3%654 1.6%18,757 ▲ +0.8%
West Town 1.5%427 2.1%25,622 ▼ -0.6%
All other city neighborhoods 10.5%2,954 21.1%253,663 ▼ -10.5%
Outside the city 26.0%7,293 35.9%432,365 ▼ -9.9%
↳ Evanston city, IL 1.1%300 1.5%17,547 ▼ -0.4%
↳ Skokie village, IL 0.9%253 1.3%15,779 ▼ -0.4%
↳ Schaumburg village, IL 0.8%221 0.9%10,377 ▼ -0.1%
↳ Oak Brook village, IL 0.8%212 0.7%8,055 ▲ +0.1%
↳ Maywood village, IL 0.7%190 0.3%3,748 ▲ +0.4%
↳ All other Illinois locations 19.4%5,458 27.4%330,297 ▼ -8.0%
Out of state 2.3%659 2.2%26,136 ▲ +0.2%
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for ward 34 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Loop 36.8%6,303 35.5%8,183 33.8%9,476 ▼ −3.1 pp▲ +3,173▼ −1.7 pp▲ +1,293▼ −1.3 pp▲ +1,880
Chicago citywide 20.0%224,635 21.0%252,791 21.5%259,168 ▲ +1.5 pp▲ +34,533▲ +0.5 pp▲ +6,377▲ +1.0 pp▲ +28,156
Near West Side 14.2%2,433 14.7%3,391 14.7%4,113 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +1,680▼ −0.1 pp▲ +722▲ +0.5 pp▲ +958
Chicago citywide 6.2%69,083 6.6%79,757 6.7%80,119 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +11,036– 0.0 pp▲ +362▲ +0.5 pp▲ +10,674
Near North Side 10.4%1,783 11.0%2,543 11.2%3,153 ▲ +0.8 pp▲ +1,370▲ +0.2 pp▲ +610▲ +0.6 pp▲ +760
Chicago citywide 8.2%92,142 9.4%112,858 9.1%109,334 ▲ +0.9 pp▲ +17,192▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3,524▲ +1.2 pp▲ +20,716
Hyde Park 2.1%362 2.0%461 2.3%654 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +292▲ +0.3 pp▲ +193▼ −0.1 pp▲ +99
Chicago citywide 1.5%16,641 1.4%16,773 1.6%18,757 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,116▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,984▼ −0.1 pp▲ +132
West Town 1.8%312 1.4%326 1.5%427 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +115▲ +0.1 pp▲ +101▼ −0.4 pp▲ +14
Chicago citywide 2.2%24,512 2.1%25,359 2.1%25,622 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,110– 0.0 pp▲ +263▼ −0.1 pp▲ +847
All other city neighborhoods 12.5%2,139 10.7%2,474 10.5%2,954 ▼ −2.0 pp▲ +815▼ −0.2 pp▲ +480▼ −1.8 pp▲ +335
Chicago citywide 22.9%257,015 21.5%259,132 21.1%253,663 ▼ −1.8 pp▼ −3,352▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,469▼ −1.4 pp▲ +2,117
Outside the city 22.1%3,784 24.6%5,666 26.0%7,293 ▲ +3.9 pp▲ +3,509▲ +1.4 pp▲ +1,627▲ +2.5 pp▲ +1,882
Chicago citywide 36.8%412,807 35.7%430,135 35.9%432,365 ▼ −0.9 pp▲ +19,558▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,230▼ −1.0 pp▲ +17,328
Evanston city, IL 1.2%198 1.3%290 1.1%300 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +102▼ −0.2 pp▲ +10▲ +0.1 pp▲ +92
Chicago citywide 1.6%17,922 1.6%18,922 1.5%17,547 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −375▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,375– 0.0 pp▲ +1,000
Skokie village, IL 0.3%51 0.4%94 0.9%253 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +202▲ +0.5 pp▲ +159▲ +0.1 pp▲ +43
Chicago citywide 1.1%12,426 1.1%12,901 1.3%15,779 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +3,353▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,878– 0.0 pp▲ +475
Schaumburg village, IL 0.7%122 0.9%210 0.8%221 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +99▼ −0.1 pp▲ +11▲ +0.2 pp▲ +88
Chicago citywide 1.1%11,818 1.0%11,930 0.9%10,377 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,441▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,553▼ −0.1 pp▲ +112
Oak Brook village, IL 0.6%97 0.6%140 0.8%212 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +115▲ +0.1 pp▲ +72– 0.0 pp▲ +43
Chicago citywide 0.7%7,408 0.6%7,560 0.7%8,055 – 0.0 pp▲ +647– 0.0 pp▲ +495– 0.0 pp▲ +152
Maywood village, IL 0.6%111 0.6%138 0.7%190 – 0.0 pp▲ +79▲ +0.1 pp▲ +52– 0.0 pp▲ +27
Chicago citywide 0.3%2,885 0.3%3,763 0.3%3,748 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +863– 0.0 pp▼ −15▲ +0.1 pp▲ +878
All other Illinois locations 16.8%2,878 18.2%4,195 19.4%5,458 ▲ +2.6 pp▲ +2,580▲ +1.2 pp▲ +1,263▲ +1.4 pp▲ +1,317
Chicago citywide 28.0%314,112 27.1%326,235 27.4%330,297 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +16,185▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,062▼ −0.9 pp▲ +12,123
Out of state 1.6%280 2.3%528 2.3%659 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +379▲ +0.1 pp▲ +131▲ +0.7 pp▲ +248
Chicago citywide 2.2%24,577 2.3%27,198 2.2%26,136 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,559▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,062▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,621

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Ward 34

Category Ward 34
Lake View 3.2%9,109
Near North Side 3.1%8,665
West Town 2.5%6,913
Near West Side 2.2%6,304
Lincoln Park 2.0%5,543
All other city neighborhoods 41.2%116,029
Outside the city 45.8%128,988
↳ Oak Park village, IL 1.1%3,073
↳ Naperville city, IL 1.0%2,932
↳ Evanston city, IL 0.9%2,422
↳ Aurora city, IL 0.7%2,037
↳ Skokie village, IL 0.7%1,896
↳ All other Illinois locations 37.4%105,318
Out of state 4.0%11,310
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in ward 34; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category Ward 34 City Difference
Lake View 3.2%9,109 3.1%44,776 ▲ +0.2%
Near North Side 3.1%8,665 2.8%40,551 ▲ +0.3%
West Town 2.5%6,913 2.5%36,343 0%
Near West Side 2.2%6,304 1.7%24,202 ▲ +0.6%
Lincoln Park 2.0%5,543 1.8%26,273 ▲ +0.2%
All other city neighborhoods 41.2%116,029 37.1%542,952 ▲ +4.1%
Outside the city 45.8%128,988 47.2%691,556 ▼ -1.4%
↳ Oak Park village, IL 1.1%3,073 0.9%13,459 ▲ +0.2%
↳ Naperville city, IL 1.0%2,932 0.9%13,352 ▲ +0.1%
↳ Evanston city, IL 0.9%2,422 0.9%13,044 0%
↳ Aurora city, IL 0.7%2,037 0.7%10,879 0%
↳ Skokie village, IL 0.7%1,896 0.9%12,545 ▼ -0.2%
↳ All other Illinois locations 37.4%105,318 37.0%540,957 ▲ +0.4%
Out of state 4.0%11,310 4.9%72,124 ▼ -0.9%
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in ward 34; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Lake View 3.7%8,730 3.5%9,193 3.2%9,109 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +379▼ −0.2 pp▼ −84▼ −0.2 pp▲ +463
Chicago citywide 3.2%41,852 3.2%45,855 3.1%44,776 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,924▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,079▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,003
Near North Side 2.9%6,913 3.2%8,622 3.1%8,665 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,752▼ −0.2 pp▲ +43▲ +0.3 pp▲ +1,709
Chicago citywide 2.4%32,132 2.9%40,974 2.8%40,551 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +8,419▼ −0.1 pp▼ −423▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,842
West Town 2.5%5,849 2.5%6,732 2.5%6,913 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,064▼ −0.1 pp▲ +181▲ +0.1 pp▲ +883
Chicago citywide 2.5%32,372 2.6%36,193 2.5%36,343 – 0.0 pp▲ +3,971▼ −0.1 pp▲ +150▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,821
Near West Side 2.1%5,031 2.2%5,935 2.2%6,304 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,273– 0.0 pp▲ +369▲ +0.1 pp▲ +904
Chicago citywide 1.5%19,348 1.6%23,248 1.7%24,202 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,854– 0.0 pp▲ +954▲ +0.2 pp▲ +3,900
Lincoln Park 2.2%5,111 2.1%5,471 2.0%5,543 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +432▼ −0.1 pp▲ +72▼ −0.1 pp▲ +360
Chicago citywide 1.8%23,722 1.9%26,727 1.8%26,273 – 0.0 pp▲ +2,551▼ −0.1 pp▼ −454▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,005
All other city neighborhoods 41.9%99,234 41.6%110,629 41.2%116,029 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +16,795▼ −0.4 pp▲ +5,400▼ −0.2 pp▲ +11,395
Chicago citywide 38.3%503,539 38.2%541,560 37.1%542,952 ▼ −1.2 pp▲ +39,413▼ −1.1 pp▲ +1,392▼ −0.1 pp▲ +38,021
Outside the city 44.8%106,200 44.8%119,055 45.8%128,988 ▲ +1.0 pp▲ +22,788▲ +1.0 pp▲ +9,933– 0.0 pp▲ +12,855
Chicago citywide 45.9%603,753 45.4%642,891 47.2%691,556 ▲ +1.3 pp▲ +87,803▲ +1.9 pp▲ +48,665▼ −0.6 pp▲ +39,138
Oak Park village, IL 1.2%2,890 1.1%2,916 1.1%3,073 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +183– 0.0 pp▲ +157▼ −0.1 pp▲ +26
Chicago citywide 1.0%12,513 0.9%13,154 0.9%13,459 – 0.0 pp▲ +946– 0.0 pp▲ +305– 0.0 pp▲ +641
Naperville city, IL 1.0%2,302 1.0%2,705 1.0%2,932 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +630– 0.0 pp▲ +227– 0.0 pp▲ +403
Chicago citywide 0.8%10,439 0.8%11,676 0.9%13,352 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,913▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,676– 0.0 pp▲ +1,237
Evanston city, IL 0.9%2,222 0.9%2,488 0.9%2,422 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +200▼ −0.1 pp▼ −66– 0.0 pp▲ +266
Chicago citywide 0.9%12,386 0.9%13,410 0.9%13,044 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +658▼ −0.1 pp▼ −366– 0.0 pp▲ +1,024
Aurora city, IL 0.7%1,687 0.7%1,919 0.7%2,037 – 0.0 pp▲ +350– 0.0 pp▲ +118– 0.0 pp▲ +232
Chicago citywide 0.7%9,006 0.7%10,248 0.7%10,879 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,873– 0.0 pp▲ +631– 0.0 pp▲ +1,242
Skokie village, IL 0.7%1,718 0.7%1,908 0.7%1,896 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +178– 0.0 pp▼ −12– 0.0 pp▲ +190
Chicago citywide 0.9%12,311 0.9%12,525 0.9%12,545 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +234– 0.0 pp▲ +20▼ −0.1 pp▲ +214
All other Illinois locations 36.1%85,659 36.2%96,256 37.4%105,318 ▲ +1.3 pp▲ +19,659▲ +1.2 pp▲ +9,062▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,597
Chicago citywide 35.6%467,892 35.1%497,967 37.0%540,957 ▲ +1.4 pp▲ +73,065▲ +1.8 pp▲ +42,990▼ −0.5 pp▲ +30,075
Out of state 4.1%9,722 4.1%10,863 4.0%11,310 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,588▼ −0.1 pp▲ +447– 0.0 pp▲ +1,141
Chicago citywide 4.9%63,789 4.8%68,287 4.9%72,124 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8,335▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,837– 0.0 pp▲ +4,498

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category Ward 34
No Computer or Smartphone 0.6% ±0.4 pp196 ±122
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 2.0% ±1.1 pp624 ±348
Desktop or Laptop Available 96.5% ±1.0 pp29,896 ±321
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
No Computer or Smartphone 0.6%±0.4 pp196±122 5.1%±0.2 pp58,709±2,246 ▼ -4.4% 49/50
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 2.0%±1.1 pp624±348 10.4%±0.3 pp120,218±3,642 ▼ -8.3% 49/50
Desktop or Laptop Available 96.5%±1.0 pp29,896±321 79.7%±0.4 pp924,956±4,919 ▲ +16.8% 2/50
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category Ward 34
Has Internet Access 99.2% ±1.6 pp30,738 ±483
Cellular Data Plan Only 3.7% ±1.3 pp1,151 ±396
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 8.0% ±1.6 pp2,486 ±484
No Internet Access 0.8% ±0.4 pp242 ±130
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Has Internet Access 99.2%±1.6 pp30,738±483 93.1%±0.3 pp1,080,419±3,310 ▲ +6.1% 2/50
Cellular Data Plan Only 3.7%±1.3 pp1,151±396 12.5%±0.3 pp145,219±3,463 ▼ -8.8% 50/50
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 8.0%±1.6 pp2,486±484 3.9%±0.2 pp45,350±1,940 ▲ +4.1% 1/50
No Internet Access 0.8%±0.4 pp242±130 6.9%±0.2 pp79,786±2,730 ▼ -6.1% 49/50
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category Ward 34
Uninsured Residents 3.5% ±0.8 pp1,854 ±412
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 5.1% ±2.2 pp2,722 ±1,188
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 3.5% ±0.9 pp1,857 ±460
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 0.3% ±1.9 pp166 ±1,004
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Uninsured Residents 3.5%±0.8 pp1,854±412 9.8%±0.2 pp264,391±5,512 ▼ -6.3% 45/50
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 5.1%±2.2 pp2,722±1,188 3.9%±0.3 pp104,687±8,689 ▲ +1.2% 15/50
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 3.5%±0.9 pp1,857±460 13.3%±0.3 pp361,430±8,202 ▼ -9.9% 47/50
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 0.3%±1.9 pp166±1,004 1.7%±0.3 pp46,718±7,559 ▼ -1.4% 48/50
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category Ward 34
Insured (Any Coverage) 96.5% ±0.8 pp51,173 ±407
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 79.9% ±2.7 pp42,340 ±1,408
Direct-Purchase Insurance 12.0% ±1.4 pp6,375 ±762
Medicare 4.7% ±1.0 pp2,517 ±507
Medicaid 3.3% ±0.7 pp1,754 ±397
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.2% ±0.3 pp89 ±152
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 2.1% ±0.8 pp1,114 ±402
Uninsured 3.5% ±0.8 pp1,829 ±407
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Insured (Any Coverage) 96.5%±0.8 pp51,173±407 90.2%±0.2 pp2,424,871±5,689 ▲ +6.3% 6/50
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 79.9%±2.7 pp42,340±1,408 51.2%±0.4 pp1,376,912±9,468 ▲ +28.6% 2/50
Direct-Purchase Insurance 12.0%±1.4 pp6,375±762 8.5%±0.2 pp227,424±5,112 ▲ +3.6% 5/50
Medicare 4.7%±1.0 pp2,517±507 12.6%±0.2 pp339,804±4,911 ▼ -7.9% 50/50
Medicaid 3.3%±0.7 pp1,754±397 22.2%±0.3 pp596,931±7,773 ▼ -18.9% 48/50
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.2%±0.3 pp89±152 0.3%±0.0 pp7,201±787 ▼ -0.1% 34/50
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 2.1%±0.8 pp1,114±402 3.8%±0.1 pp102,777±3,544 ▼ -1.7% 44/50
Uninsured 3.5%±0.8 pp1,829±407 9.8%±0.2 pp262,018±5,689 ▼ -6.3% 45/50
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category Ward 34
Adults With at Least One Disability 7.7% ±1.2 pp3,781 ±594
Mobility Disability 1.7% ±0.5 pp844 ±265
Hearing Disability 1.0% ±0.5 pp492 ±228
Vision Disability 1.4% ±0.6 pp676 ±284
Cognitive Disability 3.5% ±0.8 pp1,735 ±415
Self-Care Disability 1.0% ±0.4 pp478 ±219
Independent Living Disability 2.8% ±0.8 pp1,354 ±407
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability 7.7%±1.2 pp3,781±594 14.0%±0.2 pp303,665±4,797 ▼ -6.3% 45/50
Mobility Disability 1.7%±0.5 pp844±265 7.6%±0.2 pp163,666±3,398 ▼ -5.8% 50/50
Hearing Disability 1.0%±0.5 pp492±228 2.8%±0.1 pp61,430±2,337 ▼ -1.8% 49/50
Vision Disability 1.4%±0.6 pp676±284 3.0%±0.1 pp64,544±2,269 ▼ -1.6% 43/50
Cognitive Disability 3.5%±0.8 pp1,735±415 5.2%±0.1 pp112,824±2,939 ▼ -1.7% 41/50
Self-Care Disability 1.0%±0.4 pp478±219 2.7%±0.1 pp57,758±2,261 ▼ -1.7% 45/50
Independent Living Disability 2.8%±0.8 pp1,354±407 5.7%±0.2 pp123,651±3,247 ▼ -3.0% 44/50
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category Ward 34
Arthritis 10.7%4,443
High Blood Pressure 16.5%6,847
Cancer 3.5%1,468
Current Asthma 8.8%3,630
Coronary Heart Disease 2.1%856
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 2.3%943
Diabetes 4.7%1,947
High Cholesterol 23.9%9,902
Obesity 22.6%9,333
Stroke 1.2%504
Lost All Natural Teeth 0.3%123
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Arthritis 10.7%4,443 19.6%409,178 ▼ -8.9% 50/50
High Blood Pressure 16.5%6,847 29.7%620,030 ▼ -13.2% 49/50
Cancer 3.5%1,468 5.0%104,382 ▼ -1.5% 49/50
Current Asthma 8.8%3,630 10.2%212,940 ▼ -1.4% 47/50
Coronary Heart Disease 2.1%856 4.8%100,207 ▼ -2.7% 50/50
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 2.3%943 5.5%114,820 ▼ -3.2% 50/50
Diabetes 4.7%1,947 12.0%250,517 ▼ -7.3% 48/50
High Cholesterol 23.9%9,902 31.6%659,696 ▼ -7.7% 50/50
Obesity 22.6%9,333 32.6%680,572 ▼ -10.0% 48/50
Stroke 1.2%504 3.3%68,892 ▼ -2.1% 50/50
Lost All Natural Teeth 0.3%123 2.5%52,249 ▼ -2.2% 50/50
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category Ward 34
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 24.5%10,120
Current Cigarette Smoking 6.1%2,505
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 12.4%5,140
Short Sleep Duration 32.7%13,520
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 24.5%10,120 19.0%396,652 ▲ +5.5% 6/50
Current Cigarette Smoking 6.1%2,505 11.9%248,430 ▼ -5.8% 46/50
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 12.4%5,140 24.7%515,648 ▼ -12.3% 46/50
Short Sleep Duration 32.7%13,520 37.8%789,129 ▼ -5.1% 42/50
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category Ward 34
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 9.4%3,877
Frequent Physical Distress 6.5%2,693
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 9.4%3,877 21.1%440,493 ▼ -11.7% 46/50
Frequent Physical Distress 6.5%2,693 11.8%246,342 ▼ -5.3% 49/50
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category Ward 34
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 57.8%23,935
Routine Checkup in Past Year 72.1%29,821
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 85.7%35,454
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 60.1%24,882
Dental Visit in Past Year 69.4%28,727
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 77.3%31,972
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 57.8%23,935 72.5%1,513,542 ▼ -14.7% 49/50
Routine Checkup in Past Year 72.1%29,821 76.2%1,590,785 ▼ -4.1% 47/50
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 85.7%35,454 86.2%1,799,549 ▼ -0.5% 31/50
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 60.1%24,882 55.8%1,164,905 ▲ +4.3% 11/50
Dental Visit in Past Year 69.4%28,727 58.4%1,219,184 ▲ +11.0% 8/50
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 77.3%31,972 74.2%1,549,032 ▲ +3.1% 10/50
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category Ward 34
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 19.9%8,253
Frequent Mental Distress 14.2%5,869
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 23.4%9,700
Loneliness 34.4%14,253
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category Ward 34 City Difference Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 19.9%8,253 19.1%398,740 ▲ +0.8% 11/50
Frequent Mental Distress 14.2%5,869 16.0%334,023 ▼ -1.8% 41/50
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 23.4%9,700 28.2%588,716 ▼ -4.8% 42/50
Loneliness 34.4%14,253 35.8%747,377 ▼ -1.4% 35/50
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error


Compare All Wards