Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category	Ward 22
Hispanic	88.3% ±2.7 pp42,860 ±1,296
White	5.0% ±1.3 pp2,405 ±624
Black	4.7% ±0.8 pp2,266 ±402
Asian	1.7% ±1.1 pp801 ±528
Other or Multi-racial	0.5% ±0.3 pp221 ±161
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Hispanic	88.3%±2.7 pp42,860±1,296	29.7%±0.2 pp805,318±5,785	▲ +58.6%	2/50
White	5.0%±1.3 pp2,405±624	32.1%±0.2 pp870,127±5,557	▼ -27.1%	42/50
Black	4.7%±0.8 pp2,266±402	27.4%±0.2 pp743,710±6,047	▼ -22.8%	33/50
Asian	1.7%±1.1 pp801±528	7.2%±0.2 pp196,435±4,370	▼ -5.6%	36/50
Other or Multi-racial	0.5%±0.3 pp221±161	3.5%±0.1 pp95,636±3,778	▼ -3.1%	49/50
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Hispanic	86.8% ±1.9 pp43,430 ±947	88.7% ±1.7 pp43,871 ±833	88.3% ±2.7 pp42,860 ±1,296	▲ +1.5 pp▼ −570▼ −0.4 pp▼ −1,011▲ +1.9 pp▲ +441
Chicago citywide	28.9% ±0.2 pp785,292 ±4,750	28.8% ±0.2 pp780,167 ±5,832	29.7% ±0.2 pp805,318 ±5,785	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +20,026▲ +0.9 pp▲ +25,151▼ −0.2 pp▼ −5,125
White	4.4% ±0.8 pp2,212 ±380	4.1% ±0.7 pp2,049 ±342	5.0% ±1.3 pp2,405 ±624	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +193▲ +0.8 pp▲ +356▼ −0.3 pp▼ −163
Chicago citywide	32.2% ±0.2 pp872,513 ±4,319	33.3% ±0.2 pp901,769 ±4,468	32.1% ±0.2 pp870,127 ±5,557	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2,386▼ −1.2 pp▼ −31,642▲ +1.1 pp▲ +29,256
Black	7.5% ±1.2 pp3,773 ±598	6.3% ±0.9 pp3,117 ±439	4.7% ±0.8 pp2,266 ±402	▼ −2.9 pp▼ −1,507▼ −1.6 pp▼ −851▼ −1.2 pp▼ −656
Chicago citywide	31.5% ±0.1 pp853,214 ±3,755	29.2% ±0.2 pp790,893 ±4,690	27.4% ±0.2 pp743,710 ±6,047	▼ −4.0 pp▼ −109,504▼ −1.8 pp▼ −47,183▼ −2.3 pp▼ −62,321
Asian	0.9% ±0.3 pp434 ±160	0.5% ±0.3 pp269 ±136	1.7% ±1.1 pp801 ±528	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +367▲ +1.1 pp▲ +532▼ −0.3 pp▼ −165
Chicago citywide	5.7% ±0.1 pp154,287 ±2,942	6.5% ±0.1 pp177,195 ±3,532	7.2% ±0.2 pp196,435 ±4,370	▲ +1.6 pp▲ +42,148▲ +0.7 pp▲ +19,240▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,908
Other or Multi-racial	0.3% ±0.3 pp174 ±155	0.3% ±0.2 pp143 ±120	0.5% ±0.3 pp221 ±161	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +47▲ +0.2 pp▲ +78▼ −0.1 pp▼ −31
Chicago citywide	1.7% ±0.1 pp47,302 ±1,990	2.2% ±0.1 pp59,510 ±2,584	3.5% ±0.1 pp95,636 ±3,778	▲ +1.8 pp▲ +48,334▲ +1.3 pp▲ +36,126▲ +0.5 pp▲ +12,208

Age Distribution

Category	Ward 22
Under 5	5.3% ±1.3 pp2,566 ±624
5-17	17.7% ±1.7 pp8,580 ±831
18-24	10.8% ±1.5 pp5,244 ±735
25-44	25.6% ±1.8 pp12,406 ±866
45-64	24.3% ±1.5 pp11,812 ±749
65-74	9.2% ±1.0 pp4,486 ±497
75-84	5.0% ±0.8 pp2,416 ±380
85+	2.2% ±0.8 pp1,044 ±411
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Under 5	5.3%±1.3 pp2,566±624	5.3%±0.1 pp144,044±3,726	0%	29/50
5-17	17.7%±1.7 pp8,580±831	14.1%±0.2 pp381,582±5,292	▲ +3.6%	12/50
18-24	10.8%±1.5 pp5,244±735	9.6%±0.2 pp260,942±4,703	▲ +1.2%	15/50
25-44	25.6%±1.8 pp12,406±866	34.3%±0.2 pp929,946±6,124	▼ -8.7%	44/50
45-64	24.3%±1.5 pp11,812±749	22.9%±0.2 pp620,047±5,184	▲ +1.5%	21/50
65-74	9.2%±1.0 pp4,486±497	8.2%±0.1 pp221,932±3,538	▲ +1.1%	17/50
75-84	5.0%±0.8 pp2,416±380	4.0%±0.1 pp107,625±2,624	▲ +1.0%	11/50
85+	2.2%±0.8 pp1,044±411	1.7%±0.1 pp45,108±1,900	▲ +0.5%	12/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category	Ward 22
No High School Diploma	34.6% ±2.9 pp11,134 ±926
High School Diploma or GED	32.5% ±3.0 pp10,457 ±979
Some College or Associate's Degree	17.8% ±2.1 pp5,718 ±670
Bachelor's Degree	10.1% ±1.6 pp3,258 ±501
Graduate Degree	4.9% ±1.1 pp1,583 ±341
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
No High School Diploma	34.6%±2.9 pp11,134±926	12.8%±0.2 pp246,015±4,665	▲ +21.8%	1/50
High School Diploma or GED	32.5%±3.0 pp10,457±979	21.1%±0.3 pp405,248±5,594	▲ +11.5%	9/50
Some College or Associate's Degree	17.8%±2.1 pp5,718±670	21.8%±0.3 pp419,911±5,261	▼ -4.0%	39/50
Bachelor's Degree	10.1%±1.6 pp3,258±501	25.4%±0.3 pp488,467±5,561	▼ -15.2%	44/50
Graduate Degree	4.9%±1.1 pp1,583±341	19.0%±0.3 pp365,017±4,874	▼ -14.0%	45/50
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category	Ward 22
Total Population	48,553 ±2,943
Total Households	15,533 ±856
Population Density	12,838 ±778 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	Average Ward	Difference
Total Population	48,553	54,206	▼ −5,653
Total Households	15,533	23,200	▼ −7,667
Population Density	12,838 people/sq mi	16,281 people/sq mi	▼ −3,443
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average ward rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large wards. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19	Difference	Rank
Total Population	50,023 ±1,808	49,449 ±1,875	48,553 ±2,943	▼ −1,470 ±3,454▼ −896 ±3,490▼ −574 ±2,605	▼ −4,207▼ −4,717▼ −5,653	45/5045/5049/50
Average Ward	54,230	54,166	54,206	▼ −24▲ +40▼ −64
Total Households	13,246 ±334	14,011 ±304	15,533 ±856	▲ +2,287 ±919▲ +1,522 ±909▲ +765 ±452	▼ −7,322▼ −7,309▼ −7,667	50/5050/5048/50
Average Ward	20,568	21,320	23,200	▲ +2,631▲ +1,880▲ +751
Population Density (per sq mi)	13,227 ±478	13,075 ±496	12,838 ±778	▼ −389▼ −237▼ −152	▼ −2,689▼ −3,037▼ −3,443	25/5024/5025/50
Average Ward Density	15,916	16,112	16,281	▲ +366▲ +169▲ +196

Household Size

Category	Ward 22
Average Household Size	3.09±0.22
1-Person Households	22.4% ±3.7 pp3,480 ±576
2-Person Households	23.0% ±3.8 pp3,567 ±589
3-Person Households	16.2% ±2.7 pp2,518 ±413
4+ Person Households	38.4% ±3.5 pp5,967 ±545
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Size	3.09±0.22	2.29±0.02	▲ +0.80	3/50
1-Person Households	22.4%±3.7 pp3,480±576	39.7%±0.4 pp460,268±4,301	▼ -17.3%	48/50
2-Person Households	23.0%±3.8 pp3,567±589	29.5%±0.4 pp342,235±4,195	▼ -6.5%	45/50
3-Person Households	16.2%±2.7 pp2,518±413	12.9%±0.3 pp149,291±3,231	▲ +3.3%	7/50
4+ Person Households	38.4%±3.5 pp5,967±545	18.0%±0.3 pp208,411±4,023	▲ +20.5%	3/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category	Ward 22
Never Married	44.8% ±2.9 pp17,724 ±1,131
Married	42.6% ±1.4 pp16,869 ±557
Separated	1.8% ±0.7 pp700 ±272
Divorced	5.4% ±1.2 pp2,136 ±477
Widowed	5.5% ±0.9 pp2,166 ±344
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Never Married	44.8%±2.9 pp17,724±1,131	49.6%±0.3 pp1,130,286±6,623	▼ -4.9%	39/50
Married	42.6%±1.4 pp16,869±557	35.5%±0.3 pp807,294±6,077	▲ +7.1%	14/50
Separated	1.8%±0.7 pp700±272	2.2%±0.1 pp49,430±2,379	▼ -0.4%	33/50
Divorced	5.4%±1.2 pp2,136±477	7.9%±0.2 pp180,700±3,966	▼ -2.5%	47/50
Widowed	5.5%±0.9 pp2,166±344	4.8%±0.1 pp109,357±2,738	▲ +0.7%	17/50
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category	Ward 22
Speak English Only	19.9% ±2.0 pp9,098 ±926
Spanish	77.9% ±3.2 pp35,606 ±1,471
Other Languages	2.3% ±0.9 pp1,031 ±412
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this ward, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Speak English Only	19.9%±2.0 pp9,098±926	64.6%±0.3 pp1,659,069±8,218	▼ -44.7%	49/50
Spanish	77.9%±3.2 pp35,606±1,471	23.7%±0.2 pp607,865±6,166	▲ +54.2%	2/50
Other Languages	2.3%±0.9 pp1,031±412	1.0%±0.1 pp25,292±2,452	▲ +1.3%	34/50
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this ward, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 22
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	60.7% ±2.3 pp60.7%±2.3 pp27,897 ±1,049
Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents age 5+)	39.3% ±2.5 pp39.3%±2.5 pp18,091 ±1,159
↳ Speaks English Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	16.5% ±1.7 pp41.9%±3.3 pp7,576 ±763
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	15.8% ±2.2 pp40.3%±4.8 pp7,284 ±989
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	7.0% ±1.5 pp17.9%±3.6 pp3,231 ±681
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	60.7%±2.3 pp60.7%±2.3 pp27,897±1,049	85.4%±0.5 pp85.4%±0.5 pp2,192,778±11,961	▼ -24.8%▼ -24.8%	49/50
Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents age 5+)	39.3%±2.5 pp39.3%±2.5 pp18,091±1,159	14.6%±0.3 pp14.6%±0.3 pp374,404±6,794	▲ +24.8%▲ +24.8%	2/50
↳ Speaks English Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	16.5%±1.7 pp41.9%±3.3 pp7,576±763	7.1%±0.2 pp48.9%±0.9 pp183,252±4,686	▲ +9.3%▼ -7.1%	2/5042/50
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	15.8%±2.2 pp40.3%±4.8 pp7,284±989	5.2%±0.2 pp35.6%±0.8 pp133,269±3,923	▲ +10.6%▲ +4.7%	1/506/50
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	7.0%±1.5 pp17.9%±3.6 pp3,231±681	2.3%±0.1 pp15.5%±0.7 pp57,883±2,982	▲ +4.8%▲ +2.4%	3/5016/50
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category	Ward 22
Married-Couple Households	48.0% ±4.1 pp7,455 ±631
Unmarried-Couple Households	5.3% ±1.8 pp818 ±278
One-Person Households	22.4% ±4.1 pp3,480 ±636
Other Household Types	24.3% ±8.6 pp3,780 ±1,333
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Married-Couple Households	48.0%±4.1 pp7,455±631	30.9%±0.3 pp358,432±3,598	▲ +17.1%	5/50
Unmarried-Couple Households	5.3%±1.8 pp818±278	8.3%±0.2 pp96,220±2,797	▼ -3.0%	40/50
One-Person Households	22.4%±4.1 pp3,480±636	39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,729	▼ -17.3%	48/50
Other Household Types	24.3%±8.6 pp3,780±1,333	21.1%±0.7 pp245,285±8,514	▲ +3.2%	18/50
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category	Ward 22
Children in Married-Couple Households	61.9% ±8.7 pp6,758 ±948
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	10.3% ±3.6 pp1,122 ±389
Children in Single-Mother Households	22.7% ±5.3 pp2,475 ±578
Children in Single-Father Households	5.2% ±2.7 pp563 ±294
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households	61.9%±8.7 pp6,758±948	56.0%±0.8 pp293,542±4,257	▲ +5.9%	26/50
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	10.3%±3.6 pp1,122±389	8.8%±0.6 pp45,960±3,208	▲ +1.5%	14/50
Children in Single-Mother Households	22.7%±5.3 pp2,475±578	30.6%±0.9 pp160,535±4,521	▼ -8.0%	26/50
Children in Single-Father Households	5.2%±2.7 pp563±294	4.6%±0.4 pp24,133±2,006	▲ +0.5%	15/50
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 22
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	1.5% ±0.5 pp1.5%±0.5 pp560 ±179
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	36.8% ±22.8 pp0.6%±0.3 pp206 ±128
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	5.2% ±13.2 pp0.1%±0.2 pp29 ±74
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	25.8% ±19.0 pp0.4%±0.3 pp144 ±106
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	4.6% ±13.0 pp0.1%±0.2 pp26 ±73
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	27.6% ±23.9 pp0.4%±0.4 pp155 ±134
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	1.5%±0.5 pp1.5%±0.5 pp560±179	2.8%±0.1 pp2.8%±0.1 pp60,766±2,397	▼ -1.3%▼ -1.3%	46/50
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	36.8%±22.8 pp0.6%±0.3 pp206±128	26.8%±1.8 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,267±1,067	▲ +10.0%▼ -0.2%	13/5034/50
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	5.2%±13.2 pp0.1%±0.2 pp29±74	12.9%±1.0 pp0.4%±0.0 pp7,830±579	▼ -7.7%▼ -0.3%	44/5044/50
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	25.8%±19.0 pp0.4%±0.3 pp144±106	28.8%±1.4 pp0.8%±0.0 pp17,525±846	▼ -3.1%▼ -0.4%	33/5042/50
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	4.6%±13.0 pp0.1%±0.2 pp26±73	4.9%±0.7 pp0.1%±0.0 pp2,995±441	▼ -0.3%▼ -0.1%	22/5033/50
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	27.6%±23.9 pp0.4%±0.4 pp155±134	26.6%±1.5 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,149±916	▲ +1.1%▼ -0.3%	23/5035/50
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 22
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	60.0% ±2.9 pp60.0%±2.9 pp29,152 ±1,397
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	40.0% ±2.6 pp40.0%±2.6 pp19,401 ±1,255
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	18.4% ±1.9 pp46.0%±3.8 pp8,929 ±937
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	21.6% ±2.4 pp54.0%±4.8 pp10,472 ±1,158
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	60.0%±2.9 pp60.0%±2.9 pp29,152±1,397	79.1%±0.3 pp79.1%±0.3 pp2,144,343±7,926	▼ -19.0%▼ -19.0%	48/50
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	40.0%±2.6 pp40.0%±2.6 pp19,401±1,255	20.9%±0.3 pp20.9%±0.3 pp566,883±7,968	▲ +19.0%▲ +19.0%	3/50
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	18.4%±1.9 pp46.0%±3.8 pp8,929±937	10.0%±0.2 pp47.7%±0.5 pp270,551±4,603	▲ +8.4%▼ -1.7%	6/5026/50
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	21.6%±2.4 pp54.0%±4.8 pp10,472±1,158	10.9%±0.2 pp52.3%±0.9 pp296,332±6,504	▲ +10.6%▲ +1.7%	2/5025/50
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show

Category	Ward 22
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents)	35.4%±2.0 pp88.5%±8.6 pp17,068±977
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	4.4%11.1%2,140
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	Chicago	Difference	Rank
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents)	35.4% ±2.0 pp88.5%±8.6 pp17,068	8.2% ±0.2 pp39.3%222,978	▲ +27.1%▲ +49.2%	2/501/50
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	4.4%11.1%2,140	——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show

Category	Ward 22
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	4.6% ±1.3 pp11.4%±3.1 pp2,204 ±618
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	7.2% ±1.6 pp18.1%±3.9 pp3,483 ±765
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	9.9% ±1.7 pp24.9%±4.1 pp4,795 ±834
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	18.2% ±1.6 pp45.6%±3.1 pp8,801 ±762
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	4.6%±1.3 pp11.4%±3.1 pp2,204±618	5.9%±0.2 pp826.9%±52.1 pp159,447±5,557	▼ -1.3%▼ -815.4%	29/5048/50
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	7.2%±1.6 pp18.1%±3.9 pp3,483±765	4.5%±0.1 pp632.2%±39.2 pp121,912±4,035	▲ +2.7%▼ -614.2%	7/5039/50
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	9.9%±1.7 pp24.9%±4.1 pp4,795±834	4.6%±0.1 pp642.3%±39.3 pp123,849±3,901	▲ +5.4%▼ -617.4%	3/5013/50
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	18.2%±1.6 pp45.6%±3.1 pp8,801±762	6.0%±0.1 pp838.4%±47.5 pp161,675±3,491	▲ +12.3%▼ -792.8%	1/501/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later	0.8% ±0.4 pp376 ±193	2.9% ±0.7 pp1,414 ±346	4.6% ±1.3 pp2,204 ±618	▲ +3.8 pp▲ +1,828▲ +1.7 pp▲ +790▲ +2.1 pp▲ +1,038
Chicago citywide	1.4% ±0.1 pp36,978 ±2,235	3.7% ±0.1 pp99,118 ±3,198	5.9% ±0.2 pp159,447 ±5,568	▲ +4.5 pp▲ +122,469▲ +2.2 pp▲ +60,329▲ +2.3 pp▲ +62,140
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009	13.2% ±1.8 pp6,615 ±909	9.9% ±1.4 pp4,902 ±666	7.2% ±1.6 pp3,483 ±765	▼ −6.0 pp▼ −3,132▼ −2.7 pp▼ −1,419▼ −3.3 pp▼ −1,713
Chicago citywide	5.9% ±0.1 pp161,331 ±3,896	4.9% ±0.1 pp131,658 ±3,182	4.5% ±0.1 pp121,912 ±4,044	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −39,419▼ −0.4 pp▼ −9,746▼ −1.1 pp▼ −29,673
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999	12.7% ±1.2 pp6,322 ±622	10.7% ±1.1 pp5,262 ±538	9.9% ±1.7 pp4,795 ±834	▼ −2.7 pp▼ −1,527▼ −0.7 pp▼ −467▼ −2.0 pp▼ −1,060
Chicago citywide	6.1% ±0.1 pp165,077 ±3,717	5.3% ±0.1 pp142,413 ±3,015	4.6% ±0.1 pp123,849 ±3,911	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −41,228▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,564▼ −0.8 pp▼ −22,664
Entered the U.S. Before 1990	17.4% ±1.1 pp8,705 ±561	18.4% ±1.1 pp9,078 ±540	18.2% ±1.6 pp8,801 ±762	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +96▼ −0.2 pp▼ −277▲ +1.0 pp▲ +373
Chicago citywide	7.5% ±0.1 pp204,169 ±3,469	6.9% ±0.1 pp186,050 ±3,114	6.0% ±0.1 pp161,675 ±3,509	▼ −1.6 pp▼ −42,494▼ −0.9 pp▼ −24,375▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,119

Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category	Ward 22
Average Household Income	$76,909±$4,602
Per Capita Income	$24,737±$1,319
10th Percentile Household Income	$15,044±$3,096
25th Percentile Household Income	$29,377±$2,893
Median Household Income	$57,033±$5,091
75th Percentile Household Income	$108,223±$7,913
90th Percentile Household Income	$150,061±$10,459
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$76,909±$4,602	$116,016±$1,263	▼ −$39,107	36/50
Per Capita Income	$24,737±$1,319	$50,086±$581	▼ −$25,349	43/50
10th Percentile Household Income	$15,044±$3,096	$12,933±$271	▲ +$2,110	23/50
25th Percentile Household Income	$29,377±$2,893	$34,575±$649	▼ −$5,198	31/50
Median Household Income	$57,033±$5,091	$77,902±$907	▼ −$20,869	37/50
75th Percentile Household Income	$108,223±$7,913	$144,150±$1,210	▼ −$35,927	34/50
90th Percentile Household Income	$150,061±$10,459	Over $200,000	▼ −$49,939+	40/50
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$56,089 ±2,045	$60,374 ±2,335	$76,909 ±4,602	▲ +$20,820▲ +$16,535▲ +$4,285
Chicago citywide	$95,689 ±910	$111,304 ±1,075	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$20,327▲ +$4,712▲ +$15,615
Average Household Income (nominal dollars)	$42,330 ±1,544	$49,205 ±1,903	$76,909 ±4,602	▲ +$34,580▲ +$27,704▲ +$6,876
Chicago citywide	$72,215 ±687	$90,713 ±876	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$43,801▲ +$25,303▲ +$18,498
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$16,199 ±460	$18,662 ±492	$24,737 ±1,319	▲ +$8,538▲ +$6,075▲ +$2,463
Chicago citywide	$37,927 ±351	$45,525 ±412	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$12,160▲ +$4,562▲ +$7,598
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars)	$12,225 ±347	$15,210 ±401	$24,737 ±1,319	▲ +$12,512▲ +$9,527▲ +$2,985
Chicago citywide	$28,623 ±265	$37,103 ±336	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$21,464▲ +$12,984▲ +$8,480
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$15,254 ±1,052	$17,881 ±1,605	$15,044 ±3,096	▼ −$210▼ −$2,837▲ +$2,627
Chicago citywide	$11,828 ±190	$13,281 ±277	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$1,105▼ −$348▲ +$1,453
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$11,512 ±794	$14,573 ±1,308	$15,044 ±3,096	▲ +$3,532▲ +$471▲ +$3,061
Chicago citywide	$8,927 ±144	$10,824 ±225	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$4,007▲ +$2,109▲ +$1,898
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$26,224 ±1,508	$27,282 ±1,007	$29,377 ±2,893	▲ +$3,153▲ +$2,095▲ +$1,058
Chicago citywide	$28,727 ±321	$31,597 ±462	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$5,848▲ +$2,979▲ +$2,869
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$19,791 ±1,138	$22,235 ±821	$29,377 ±2,893	▲ +$9,586▲ +$7,142▲ +$2,444
Chicago citywide	$21,680 ±242	$25,751 ±376	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$12,895▲ +$8,824▲ +$4,071
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$45,681 ±1,884	$45,870 ±2,709	$57,033 ±5,091	▲ +$11,353▲ +$11,164▲ +$189
Chicago citywide	$63,379 ±591	$71,469 ±723	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$14,523▲ +$6,433▲ +$8,090
Median Household Income (nominal dollars)	$34,474 ±1,422	$37,384 ±2,208	$57,033 ±5,091	▲ +$22,559▲ +$19,649▲ +$2,909
Chicago citywide	$47,831 ±446	$58,247 ±589	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$30,071▲ +$19,655▲ +$10,416
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$73,173 ±3,147	$79,480 ±4,386	$108,223 ±7,913	▲ +$35,050▲ +$28,743▲ +$6,308
Chicago citywide	$122,019 ±806	$139,501 ±1,057	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$22,131▲ +$4,648▲ +$17,482
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$55,222 ±2,375	$64,777 ±3,575	$108,223 ±7,913	▲ +$53,001▲ +$43,446▲ +$9,554
Chicago citywide	$92,086 ±608	$113,694 ±862	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$52,064▲ +$30,456▲ +$21,608
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$113,028 ±6,719	$123,292 ±7,424	$150,061 ±10,459	▲ +$37,034▲ +$26,770▲ +$10,264
Chicago citywide	$202,601 ±2,442	$235,390 ±1,636	—	——▲ +$32,790
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$85,300 ±5,071	$100,483 ±6,051	$150,061 ±10,459	▲ +$64,761▲ +$49,578▲ +$15,183
Chicago citywide	$152,899 ±1,843	$191,844 ±1,333	—	——▲ +$38,944

Poverty Status

Category	Ward 22
Below Poverty Line	17.5% ±3.1 pp8,496 ±1,506
Below 200% Poverty Line	41.9% ±4.6 pp20,333 ±2,243
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	8.1% ±1.9 pp3,916 ±923
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Below Poverty Line	17.5%±3.1 pp8,496±1,506	16.8%±0.4 pp456,194±11,330	▲ +0.7%	25/50
Below 200% Poverty Line	41.9%±4.6 pp20,333±2,243	33.4%±0.6 pp905,794±16,660	▲ +8.5%	14/50
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	8.1%±1.9 pp3,916±923	8.3%±0.3 pp226,117±7,649	▼ -0.3%	23/50
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Category	Ward 22
Food Insecurity	39.5%14,773
Housing Insecurity	30.6%11,445
Transportation Barriers	16.9%6,310
Threatened Utility Shutoff	15.8%5,920
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Food Insecurity	39.5%14,773	24.4%509,385	▲ +15.1%	8/50
Housing Insecurity	30.6%11,445	19.7%411,266	▲ +10.9%	9/50
Transportation Barriers	16.9%6,310	11.6%242,167	▲ +5.3%	12/50
Threatened Utility Shutoff	15.8%5,920	11.9%248,430	▲ +3.9%	15/50
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category	Ward 22
In Labor Force	78.3% ±3.1 pp14,730 ±589
↳ Employed	72.2% ±3.5 pp13,569 ±655
↳ Unemployed	5.7% ±1.6 pp1,070 ±308
↳ Unemployment Rate	7.3% ±2.1 pp—
Not in Labor Force	21.7% ±9.3 pp4,070 ±1,749
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
In Labor Force	78.3%±3.1 pp14,730±589	85.6%±0.3 pp1,069,076±3,571	▼ -7.2%	41/50
↳ Employed	72.2%±3.5 pp13,569±655	79.6%±0.3 pp994,466±4,015	▼ -7.4%	36/50
↳ Unemployed	5.7%±1.6 pp1,070±308	5.9%±0.2 pp73,968±2,565	▼ -0.2%	24/50
↳ Unemployment Rate	7.3%±2.1 pp—	6.9%±0.2 pp86,502±3,074	▲ +0.4%	21/50
Not in Labor Force	21.7%±9.3 pp4,070±1,749	14.4%±1.1 pp180,399±13,145	▲ +7.2%	10/50
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category	Ward 22
Management, Business, Science & Arts	23.5% ±3.1 pp4,903 ±639
↳ Management Occupations	6.1% ±1.5 pp1,275 ±308
↳ Business & Financial Operations	3.6% ±1.4 pp758 ±288
↳ Computer & Mathematical	1.8% ±1.0 pp383 ±202
↳ Architecture & Engineering	0.2% ±0.4 pp37 ±77
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	0.6% ±0.7 pp129 ±146
↳ Community & Social Service	2.1% ±0.9 pp431 ±191
↳ Legal Occupations	0.4% ±0.4 pp87 ±90
↳ Education, Training & Library	4.1% ±1.2 pp846 ±245
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	1.5% ±0.8 pp311 ±171
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	2.4% ±1.1 pp500 ±237
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	0.7% ±0.5 pp146 ±110
Service	25.1% ±3.8 pp5,242 ±804
↳ Healthcare Support	5.7% ±2.0 pp1,201 ±409
↳ Protective Service	3.9% ±2.1 pp820 ±429
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	5.3% ±1.4 pp1,097 ±297
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	7.5% ±1.9 pp1,573 ±401
↳ Personal Care & Service	2.6% ±1.0 pp551 ±217
Sales & Office	17.8% ±2.7 pp3,723 ±556
↳ Sales & Related	7.1% ±1.9 pp1,473 ±387
↳ Office & Administrative Support	10.8% ±1.9 pp2,250 ±394
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	8.5% ±2.0 pp1,779 ±419
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.2% ±0.4 pp35 ±83
↳ Construction & Extraction	5.7% ±1.8 pp1,199 ±366
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	2.6% ±1.1 pp545 ±234
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	25.1% ±3.8 pp5,246 ±795
↳ Production Occupations	9.5% ±2.4 pp1,986 ±505
↳ Transportation Occupations	5.2% ±1.7 pp1,093 ±345
↳ Material Moving Occupations	10.4% ±2.6 pp2,167 ±551
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts	23.5%±3.1 pp4,903±639	49.2%±0.4 pp686,743±5,710	▼ -25.7%	45/50
↳ Management Occupations	6.1%±1.5 pp1,275±308	12.3%±0.3 pp172,182±3,807	▼ -6.2%	44/50
↳ Business & Financial Operations	3.6%±1.4 pp758±288	9.1%±0.2 pp127,081±3,358	▼ -5.5%	44/50
↳ Computer & Mathematical	1.8%±1.0 pp383±202	4.9%±0.2 pp68,921±2,690	▼ -3.1%	41/50
↳ Architecture & Engineering	0.2%±0.4 pp37±77	1.6%±0.1 pp22,779±1,380	▼ -1.5%	50/50
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	0.6%±0.7 pp129±146	1.4%±0.1 pp19,126±1,340	▼ -0.8%	35/50
↳ Community & Social Service	2.1%±0.9 pp431±191	1.9%±0.1 pp26,973±1,500	▲ +0.1%	23/50
↳ Legal Occupations	0.4%±0.4 pp87±90	2.3%±0.1 pp31,629±1,814	▼ -1.8%	43/50
↳ Education, Training & Library	4.1%±1.2 pp846±245	6.6%±0.2 pp92,316±2,697	▼ -2.6%	47/50
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	1.5%±0.8 pp311±171	3.1%±0.1 pp43,879±1,786	▼ -1.7%	38/50
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	2.4%±1.1 pp500±237	4.6%±0.2 pp63,551±2,652	▼ -2.2%	37/50
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	0.7%±0.5 pp146±110	1.3%±0.1 pp18,306±1,387	▼ -0.6%	43/50
Service	25.1%±3.8 pp5,242±804	16.9%±0.3 pp235,977±4,217	▲ +8.2%	7/50
↳ Healthcare Support	5.7%±2.0 pp1,201±409	3.4%±0.2 pp46,792±2,107	▲ +2.4%	11/50
↳ Protective Service	3.9%±2.1 pp820±429	2.8%±0.1 pp39,146±1,734	▲ +1.1%	18/50
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	5.3%±1.4 pp1,097±297	5.1%±0.2 pp70,514±2,393	▲ +0.2%	19/50
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	7.5%±1.9 pp1,573±401	3.0%±0.1 pp41,783±1,967	▲ +4.5%	3/50
↳ Personal Care & Service	2.6%±1.0 pp551±217	2.7%±0.1 pp37,742±1,657	▼ -0.1%	29/50
Sales & Office	17.8%±2.7 pp3,723±556	17.4%±0.3 pp243,580±4,754	▲ +0.4%	24/50
↳ Sales & Related	7.1%±1.9 pp1,473±387	8.1%±0.2 pp113,073±3,174	▼ -1.0%	40/50
↳ Office & Administrative Support	10.8%±1.9 pp2,250±394	9.3%±0.3 pp130,507±3,591	▲ +1.4%	18/50
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	8.5%±2.0 pp1,779±419	4.6%±0.2 pp64,338±2,929	▲ +3.9%	9/50
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.2%±0.4 pp35±83	0.1%±0.0 pp1,506±406	▲ +0.1%	12/50
↳ Construction & Extraction	5.7%±1.8 pp1,199±366	2.8%±0.1 pp39,432±2,062	▲ +2.9%	10/50
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	2.6%±1.1 pp545±234	1.7%±0.1 pp23,400±1,722	▲ +0.9%	12/50
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	25.1%±3.8 pp5,246±795	11.8%±0.3 pp165,261±3,629	▲ +13.3%	2/50
↳ Production Occupations	9.5%±2.4 pp1,986±505	4.2%±0.2 pp57,989±2,275	▲ +5.4%	4/50
↳ Transportation Occupations	5.2%±1.7 pp1,093±345	3.9%±0.2 pp54,099±2,118	▲ +1.4%	19/50
↳ Material Moving Occupations	10.4%±2.6 pp2,167±551	3.8%±0.2 pp53,173±2,312	▲ +6.6%	1/50
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category	Ward 22
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	1.2% ±1.6 pp252 ±339
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	1.2% ±1.6 pp252 ±339
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0% ±0.3 pp0
Construction	7.4% ±1.9 pp1,536 ±397
Manufacturing	14.1% ±2.5 pp2,945 ±515
Wholesale Trade	2.9% ±1.0 pp601 ±208
Retail Trade	10.7% ±2.3 pp2,239 ±477
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	7.4% ±1.8 pp1,550 ±374
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	7.4% ±1.8 pp1,546 ±374
↳ Utilities	0.0% ±0.3 pp4 ±72
Information	1.0% ±0.7 pp210 ±142
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	4.3% ±1.3 pp895 ±267
↳ Finance & Insurance	3.6% ±1.2 pp751 ±252
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	0.7% ±0.6 pp144 ±119
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	13.9% ±2.5 pp2,900 ±517
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	3.6% ±1.2 pp755 ±249
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.2% ±0.5 pp52 ±111
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	10.0% ±2.2 pp2,093 ±459
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	19.8% ±2.6 pp4,136 ±548
↳ Educational Services	6.7% ±1.6 pp1,391 ±326
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	13.1% ±2.4 pp2,745 ±501
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	10.3% ±2.0 pp2,162 ±423
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	1.7% ±0.8 pp365 ±165
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	8.6% ±1.9 pp1,797 ±406
Other Services	5.2% ±1.5 pp1,084 ±317
Public Administration	1.8% ±0.7 pp383 ±143
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	1.2%±1.6 pp252±339	0.2%±0.0 pp—	▲ +1.0%	1/50
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	1.2%±1.6 pp252±339	0.2%±0.0 pp—	▲ +1.0%	1/50
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%±0.3 pp0	0.0%±0.0 pp—	0%	23/50
Construction	7.4%±1.9 pp1,536±397	3.8%±0.2 pp—	▲ +3.6%	3/50
Manufacturing	14.1%±2.5 pp2,945±515	7.7%±0.2 pp—	▲ +6.4%	2/50
Wholesale Trade	2.9%±1.0 pp601±208	2.0%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.8%	7/50
Retail Trade	10.7%±2.3 pp2,239±477	8.2%±0.2 pp—	▲ +2.5%	6/50
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	7.4%±1.8 pp1,550±374	7.1%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.3%	24/50
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	7.4%±1.8 pp1,546±374	6.5%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.9%	23/50
↳ Utilities	0.0%±0.3 pp4±72	0.5%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.5%	50/50
Information	1.0%±0.7 pp210±142	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▼ -1.1%	39/50
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	4.3%±1.3 pp895±267	8.8%±0.2 pp—	▼ -4.5%	46/50
↳ Finance & Insurance	3.6%±1.2 pp751±252	6.7%±0.2 pp—	▼ -3.1%	41/50
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	0.7%±0.6 pp144±119	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▼ -1.5%	50/50
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	13.9%±2.5 pp2,900±517	18.2%±0.4 pp—	▼ -4.3%	25/50
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	3.6%±1.2 pp755±249	13.4%±0.3 pp—	▼ -9.8%	46/50
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.2%±0.5 pp52±111	0.1%±0.0 pp—	▲ +0.1%	6/50
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	10.0%±2.2 pp2,093±459	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▲ +5.4%	1/50
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	19.8%±2.6 pp4,136±548	24.2%±0.4 pp—	▼ -4.4%	42/50
↳ Educational Services	6.7%±1.6 pp1,391±326	10.5%±0.2 pp—	▼ -3.8%	47/50
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	13.1%±2.4 pp2,745±501	13.7%±0.3 pp—	▼ -0.5%	25/50
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	10.3%±2.0 pp2,162±423	9.1%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.2%	16/50
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	1.7%±0.8 pp365±165	2.2%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.5%	34/50
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	8.6%±1.9 pp1,797±406	6.9%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.7%	12/50
Other Services	5.2%±1.5 pp1,084±317	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.6%	20/50
Public Administration	1.8%±0.7 pp383±143	4.0%±0.2 pp—	▼ -2.2%	47/50
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category	Ward 22
Private Company Employee	68.5% ±2.6 pp14,314 ±543
Self-Employed	8.8% ±2.3 pp1,831 ±471
Nonprofit	12.4% ±3.1 pp2,600 ±651
Government	8.9% ±1.7 pp1,861 ±353
Unpaid Family Worker	1.4% ±0.9 pp288 ±182
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Private Company Employee	68.5%±2.6 pp14,314±543	67.9%±0.4 pp947,845±5,822	▲ +0.6%	21/50
Self-Employed	8.8%±2.3 pp1,831±471	8.3%±0.2 pp115,690±2,989	▲ +0.5%	18/50
Nonprofit	12.4%±3.1 pp2,600±651	12.1%±0.3 pp169,124±4,035	▲ +0.3%	18/50
Government	8.9%±1.7 pp1,861±353	12.9%±0.3 pp179,945±4,021	▼ -4.0%	42/50
Unpaid Family Worker	1.4%±0.9 pp288±182	0.2%±0.0 pp2,312±408	▲ +1.2%	1/50
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category	Ward 22
Full-Time, Year-Round	67.7% ±3.2 pp15,397 ±733
Part-Time or Part-Year	32.3% ±3.1 pp7,341 ±711
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round	67.7%±3.2 pp15,397±733	67.0%±0.3 pp1,025,726±3,875	▲ +0.7%	18/50
Part-Time or Part-Year	32.3%±3.1 pp7,341±711	33.0%±0.3 pp504,210±4,897	▼ -0.7%	33/50
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category	Ward 22
Average FT Earnings	$48,974±$2,580
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$22,803±$2,072
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$32,373±$1,387
Median FT Earnings	$44,535±$2,996
75th Percentile FT Earnings	$66,462±$3,788
90th Percentile FT Earnings	$90,477±$3,936
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Average FT Earnings	$48,974±$2,580	$96,214±$968	▼ −$47,241	48/50
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$22,803±$2,072	$29,008±$387	▼ −$6,205	42/50
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$32,373±$1,387	$43,011±$345	▼ −$10,638	47/50
Median FT Earnings	$44,535±$2,996	$69,663±$530	▼ −$25,127	46/50
75th Percentile FT Earnings	$66,462±$3,788	Over $100,000	▼ −$33,538+	46/50
90th Percentile FT Earnings	$90,477±$3,936	Over $100,000	▼ −$9,523+	49/50
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$42,530 ±946	$43,832 ±1,185	$48,974 ±2,580	▲ +$6,444▲ +$5,141▲ +$1,302
Chicago citywide	$83,170 ±714	$91,467 ±682	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$13,044▲ +$4,747▲ +$8,297
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$32,097 ±714	$35,723 ±966	$48,974 ±2,580	▲ +$16,877▲ +$13,250▲ +$3,627
Chicago citywide	$62,767 ±539	$74,546 ±556	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$33,447▲ +$21,669▲ +$11,778
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$20,571 ±655	$20,904 ±996	$22,803 ±2,072	▲ +$2,232▲ +$1,899▲ +$333
Chicago citywide	$24,209 ±243	$26,113 ±152	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$4,799▲ +$2,895▲ +$1,904
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$15,525 ±494	$17,037 ±811	$22,803 ±2,072	▲ +$7,279▲ +$5,766▲ +$1,512
Chicago citywide	$18,270 ±183	$21,282 ±124	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$10,738▲ +$7,726▲ +$3,012
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$26,567 ±875	$26,626 ±696	$32,373 ±1,387	▲ +$5,806▲ +$5,747▲ +$58
Chicago citywide	$37,393 ±278	$39,415 ±229	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$5,618▲ +$3,597▲ +$2,021
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$20,050 ±660	$21,700 ±568	$32,373 ±1,387	▲ +$12,323▲ +$10,673▲ +$1,650
Chicago citywide	$28,220 ±210	$32,123 ±187	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$14,791▲ +$10,888▲ +$3,903
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$36,335 ±1,597	$38,047 ±1,202	$44,535 ±2,996	▲ +$8,200▲ +$6,488▲ +$1,712
Chicago citywide	$60,575 ±496	$64,628 ±327	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,034▲ +$4,054
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$27,422 ±1,205	$31,008 ±979	$44,535 ±2,996	▲ +$17,113▲ +$13,527▲ +$3,587
Chicago citywide	$45,715 ±374	$52,672 ±266	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$23,948▲ +$16,991▲ +$6,957
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$51,158 ±1,744	$52,890 ±2,407	$66,462 ±3,788	▲ +$15,304▲ +$13,572▲ +$1,732
Chicago citywide	$98,274 ±615	$108,202 ±616	—	——▲ +$9,928
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$38,608 ±1,316	$43,105 ±1,961	$66,462 ±3,788	▲ +$27,854▲ +$23,357▲ +$4,497
Chicago citywide	$74,166 ±464	$88,185 ±502	—	——▲ +$14,019
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$74,608 ±4,211	$76,174 ±2,975	$90,477 ±3,936	▲ +$15,868▲ +$14,302▲ +$1,566
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$56,306 ±3,178	$62,082 ±2,424	$90,477 ±3,936	▲ +$34,171▲ +$28,395▲ +$5,776
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category	Ward 22
Average PT Earnings	$23,419±$5,284
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$1,995±$541
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$6,083±$1,316
Median PT Earnings	$13,634±$2,429
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$26,211±$2,310
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$44,844±$6,431
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Average PT Earnings	$23,419±$5,284	$33,575±$750	▼ −$10,156	41/50
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$1,995±$541	$2,183±$87	▼ −$189	30/50
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$6,083±$1,316	$7,222±$206	▼ −$1,138	35/50
Median PT Earnings	$13,634±$2,429	$19,180±$393	▼ −$5,545	47/50
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$26,211±$2,310	$38,498±$681	▼ −$12,287	49/50
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$44,844±$6,431	$73,776±$1,391	▼ −$28,932	49/50
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$17,721 ±1,025	$20,170 ±1,482	$23,419 ±5,284	▲ +$5,698▲ +$3,249▲ +$2,449
Chicago citywide	$27,076 ±473	$31,236 ±676	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$6,500▲ +$2,340▲ +$4,160
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$13,374 ±774	$16,439 ±1,208	$23,419 ±5,284	▲ +$10,046▲ +$6,981▲ +$3,065
Chicago citywide	$20,433 ±357	$25,457 ±551	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$13,142▲ +$8,118▲ +$5,024
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$3,335 ±493	$2,589 ±513	$1,995 ±541	▼ −$1,341▼ −$594▼ −$746
Chicago citywide	$2,230 ±48	$2,283 ±59	$2,183 ±87	▼ −$47▼ −$100▲ +$53
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$2,517 ±372	$2,110 ±418	$1,995 ±541	▼ −$522▼ −$115▼ −$407
Chicago citywide	$1,683 ±36	$1,861 ±48	$2,183 ±87	▲ +$500▲ +$322▲ +$178
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$7,135 ±864	$7,320 ±1,346	$6,083 ±1,316	▼ −$1,052▼ −$1,237▲ +$185
Chicago citywide	$6,390 ±123	$6,841 ±156	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$832▲ +$381▲ +$451
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$5,385 ±652	$5,966 ±1,097	$6,083 ±1,316	▲ +$698▲ +$117▲ +$581
Chicago citywide	$4,822 ±93	$5,575 ±127	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$2,399▲ +$1,646▲ +$753
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$14,543 ±861	$16,168 ±1,376	$13,634 ±2,429	▼ −$908▼ −$2,534▲ +$1,625
Chicago citywide	$15,461 ±166	$17,025 ±275	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$3,719▲ +$2,155▲ +$1,563
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$10,975 ±650	$13,177 ±1,121	$13,634 ±2,429	▲ +$2,659▲ +$457▲ +$2,202
Chicago citywide	$11,668 ±125	$13,875 ±224	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$7,512▲ +$5,305▲ +$2,207
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$22,519 ±1,334	$25,774 ±1,976	$26,211 ±2,310	▲ +$3,691▲ +$436▲ +$3,255
Chicago citywide	$30,795 ±619	$34,779 ±505	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$7,703▲ +$3,719▲ +$3,984
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$16,995 ±1,007	$21,006 ±1,610	$26,211 ±2,310	▲ +$9,216▲ +$5,205▲ +$4,011
Chicago citywide	$23,241 ±468	$28,345 ±412	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$15,257▲ +$10,153▲ +$5,104
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$35,534 ±3,905	$43,142 ±5,660	$44,844 ±6,431	▲ +$9,310▲ +$1,703▲ +$7,607
Chicago citywide	$61,207 ±1,249	$68,040 ±1,298	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$12,570▲ +$5,737▲ +$6,833
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$26,817 ±2,947	$35,160 ±4,613	$44,844 ±6,431	▲ +$18,027▲ +$9,684▲ +$8,343
Chicago citywide	$46,192 ±942	$55,452 ±1,058	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$27,585▲ +$18,324▲ +$9,261

Earnings of All Workers

Category	Ward 22
Average Earnings	$40,476±$2,387
10th Percentile Earnings	$7,384±$1,247
25th Percentile Earnings	$20,719±$2,076
Median Earnings	$35,995±$1,734
75th Percentile Earnings	$56,429±$3,681
90th Percentile Earnings	$83,243±$5,345
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Average Earnings	$40,476±$2,387	$75,571±$768	▼ −$35,095	47/50
10th Percentile Earnings	$7,384±$1,247	$8,529±$272	▼ −$1,146	29/50
25th Percentile Earnings	$20,719±$2,076	$25,183±$358	▼ −$4,463	33/50
Median Earnings	$35,995±$1,734	$51,367±$471	▼ −$15,372	43/50
75th Percentile Earnings	$56,429±$3,681	$93,324±$598	▼ −$36,895	45/50
90th Percentile Earnings	$83,243±$5,345	Over $100,000	▼ −$16,757+	47/50
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$32,466 ±765	$35,324 ±933	$40,476 ±2,387	▲ +$8,010▲ +$5,152▲ +$2,858
Chicago citywide	$62,453 ±534	$71,626 ±551	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$13,118▲ +$3,945▲ +$9,173
Average Earnings (nominal dollars)	$24,502 ±577	$28,789 ±760	$40,476 ±2,387	▲ +$15,974▲ +$11,687▲ +$4,288
Chicago citywide	$47,133 ±403	$58,375 ±449	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$28,438▲ +$17,196▲ +$11,243
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$6,930 ±871	$7,757 ±1,273	$7,384 ±1,247	▲ +$453▼ −$374▲ +$827
Chicago citywide	$6,858 ±139	$8,358 ±164	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$1,671▲ +$171▲ +$1,500
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$5,230 ±657	$6,322 ±1,038	$7,384 ±1,247	▲ +$2,153▲ +$1,061▲ +$1,092
Chicago citywide	$5,176 ±105	$6,812 ±134	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$3,354▲ +$1,717▲ +$1,636
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$15,993 ±965	$18,880 ±913	$20,719 ±2,076	▲ +$4,726▲ +$1,839▲ +$2,887
Chicago citywide	$19,598 ±241	$23,173 ±290	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$5,585▲ +$2,010▲ +$3,576
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$12,070 ±728	$15,387 ±744	$20,719 ±2,076	▲ +$8,650▲ +$5,332▲ +$3,317
Chicago citywide	$14,790 ±182	$18,886 ±236	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$10,393▲ +$6,297▲ +$4,096
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$27,304 ±777	$29,800 ±1,604	$35,995 ±1,734	▲ +$8,691▲ +$6,195▲ +$2,496
Chicago citywide	$42,365 ±293	$47,195 ±370	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$9,002▲ +$4,172▲ +$4,830
Median Earnings (nominal dollars)	$20,606 ±586	$24,287 ±1,307	$35,995 ±1,734	▲ +$15,389▲ +$11,708▲ +$3,681
Chicago citywide	$31,972 ±221	$38,464 ±302	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$19,395▲ +$12,903▲ +$6,492
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$43,124 ±1,595	$45,478 ±1,796	$56,429 ±3,681	▲ +$13,305▲ +$10,951▲ +$2,355
Chicago citywide	$78,784 ±555	$87,853 ±597	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$14,540▲ +$5,471▲ +$9,069
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$32,545 ±1,204	$37,065 ±1,463	$56,429 ±3,681	▲ +$23,884▲ +$19,364▲ +$4,520
Chicago citywide	$59,457 ±418	$71,600 ±486	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$33,867▲ +$21,723▲ +$12,144
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$63,677 ±4,026	$67,900 ±2,826	$83,243 ±5,345	▲ +$19,566▲ +$15,342▲ +$4,223
Chicago citywide	$128,659 ±682	—	—	———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$48,056 ±3,039	$55,339 ±2,303	$83,243 ±5,345	▲ +$35,187▲ +$27,904▲ +$7,283
Chicago citywide	$97,097 ±515	—	—	———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 22

Category	Ward 22
Household income at age 35	$43,232 ±$621
Household income percentile rank	41.5 ±0.43 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	8.41% ±0.46 pp
Individual income at age 35	$33,638 ±$523
Fraction married	30.7% ±0.78 pp
Employment rate	73.7% ±0.76 pp
Incarceration rate	1.80% ±0.28 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 22. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 22 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$43,232 ±$621	$43,090 ±$102	+$142
Household income percentile rank	41.5 ±0.43 pp	40.9 ±0.06 pp	+0.6 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	8.41% ±0.46 pp	11.4% ±0.08 pp	−3.0 pp
Individual income at age 35	$33,638 ±$523	$33,544 ±$80	+$94
Fraction married	30.7% ±0.78 pp	26.4% ±0.11 pp	+4.3 pp
Employment rate	73.7% ±0.76 pp	74.4% ±0.11 pp	−0.7 pp
Incarceration rate	1.80% ±0.28 pp	2.87% ±0.05 pp	−1.1 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 22. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 22 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 22 in Lower-Income Families

Category	Ward 22
Household income at age 35	$38,133 ±$811
Household income percentile rank	37.9 ±0.57 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	6.07% ±0.59 pp
Individual income at age 35	$30,057 ±$694
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 22 with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 22 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$38,133 ±$811	$34,711 ±$124	+$3,422
Household income percentile rank	37.9 ±0.57 pp	35.3 ±0.09 pp	+2.5 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	6.07% ±0.59 pp	6.31% ±0.09 pp	−0.2 pp
Individual income at age 35	$30,057 ±$694	$28,716 ±$106	+$1,341
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 22 with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 22 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Ward 22

Category	Ward 22
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	85.3% ±0.63 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	30.8% ±0.82 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 22. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 22 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	85.3% ±0.63 pp	78.1% ±0.11 pp	+7.1 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	30.8% ±0.82 pp	22.9% ±0.11 pp	+7.9 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 22. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 22 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Ward 22

Category	Ward 22
All jobs located in ward 22	9,323
Ward 22 jobs held by Ward 22 residents	6.5%
Ward 22 jobs held by non-Ward 22 residents	93.5%
Employed residents working in Ward 22	4.1%
Employed residents working outside Ward 22	95.9%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 22	Chicago ward median	Difference	Rank
All jobs located in ward 22	9,323	11,093	▼ −1,770	33/50
Ward 22 jobs held by Ward 22 residents	6.5%	6.3%	▲ +0.2 pp	23/50
Ward 22 jobs held by non-Ward 22 residents	93.5%	93.7%	▼ −0.2 pp	28/50
Employed residents working in Ward 22	4.1%	3.2%	▲ +1.0 pp	16/50
Employed residents working outside Ward 22	95.9%	96.8%	▼ −1.0 pp	35/50
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in ward 22	7,831	7,819	9,323	▲ +1,492▲ +1,504▼ −12
Chicago citywide	10,920	11,554	11,093	▲ +174▼ −460▲ +634
Ward 22 jobs held by Ward 22 residents	5.4%389	6.7%487	6.5%571	▲ +1.2 pp▲ +182▼ −0.2 pp▲ +84▲ +1.4 pp▲ +98
Chicago citywide	6.4%696	6.4%725	6.3%701	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5▼ −0.1 pp▼ −24– 0.0 pp▲ +29
Ward 22 jobs held by non-Ward 22 residents	94.6%6,879	93.3%6,764	93.5%8,210	▼ −1.2 pp▲ +1,331▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,446▼ −1.4 pp▼ −115
Chicago citywide	93.6%9,244	93.6%9,497	93.7%9,122	▲ +0.1 pp▼ −122▲ +0.1 pp▼ −375– 0.0 pp▲ +253
Employed residents working in Ward 22	2.9%389	3.5%487	4.1%571	▲ +1.2 pp▲ +182▲ +0.6 pp▲ +84▲ +0.7 pp▲ +98
Chicago citywide	3.3%696	3.0%725	3.2%701	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5▲ +0.1 pp▼ −24▼ −0.2 pp▲ +29
Employed residents working outside Ward 22	97.1%13,151	96.5%13,336	95.9%13,314	▼ −1.2 pp▲ +163▼ −0.6 pp▼ −22▼ −0.7 pp▲ +185
Chicago citywide	96.7%19,233	97.0%20,782	96.8%20,998	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,765▼ −0.1 pp▲ +216▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,549

Industry of Jobs in Ward 22

Category	Ward 22
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.1%5
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%2
Construction	2.2%202
Manufacturing	12.7%1,186
Wholesale Trade	5.1%471
Retail Trade	25.2%2,352
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	18.3%1,705
↳ Utilities	0.0%0
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	18.3%1,705
Information	0.2%21
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	2.4%222
↳ Finance & Insurance	1.7%163
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	0.6%59
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	10.7%998
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	1.4%135
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	2.5%231
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	6.8%632
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	8.0%749
↳ Educational Services	2.1%200
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	5.9%549
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	11.0%1,026
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	0.2%22
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	10.8%1,004
Other Services	4.1%386
Public Administration	0.0%0
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.1%5	0.0%423	0%	8/50
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%2	0.0%36	0%	3/50
Construction	2.2%202	1.9%27,207	▲ +0.3%	29/50
Manufacturing	12.7%1,186	4.4%64,747	▲ +8.3%	13/50
Wholesale Trade	5.1%471	2.8%41,460	▲ +2.2%	13/50
Retail Trade	25.2%2,352	6.6%96,413	▲ +18.6%	6/50
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	18.3%1,705	6.0%87,845	▲ +12.3%	6/50
↳ Utilities	0.0%0	0.3%5,012	▼ -0.3%	20/50
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	18.3%1,705	5.7%82,833	▲ +12.6%	5/50
Information	0.2%21	3.5%51,095	▼ -3.3%	41/50
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	2.4%222	10.8%157,520	▼ -8.4%	39/50
↳ Finance & Insurance	1.7%163	8.6%125,824	▼ -6.8%	27/50
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	0.6%59	2.2%31,696	▼ -1.5%	43/50
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	10.7%998	23.2%339,220	▼ -12.5%	29/50
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	1.4%135	14.2%207,444	▼ -12.7%	43/50
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	2.5%231	1.2%16,872	▲ +1.3%	4/50
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	6.8%632	7.9%114,904	▼ -1.1%	20/50
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	8.0%749	23.0%336,089	▼ -14.9%	45/50
↳ Educational Services	2.1%200	9.2%134,671	▼ -7.1%	30/50
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	5.9%549	13.8%201,418	▼ -7.9%	47/50
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	11.0%1,026	10.3%151,055	▲ +0.7%	22/50
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	0.2%22	1.9%27,339	▼ -1.6%	34/50
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	10.8%1,004	8.5%123,716	▲ +2.3%	19/50
Other Services	4.1%386	4.0%59,136	▲ +0.1%	30/50
Public Administration	0.0%0	3.5%51,418	▼ -3.5%	22/50
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0	0.1%8	0.1%5	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5– 0.0 pp▼ −3▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8
Chicago citywide	0.0%181	0.0%569	0.0%423	– 0.0 pp▲ +242– 0.0 pp▼ −146– 0.0 pp▲ +388
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0	0.1%4	0.0%2	– 0.0 pp▲ +2– 0.0 pp▼ −2▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4
Chicago citywide	0.0%140	0.0%374	0.0%36	– 0.0 pp▼ −104– 0.0 pp▼ −338– 0.0 pp▲ +234
Construction	2.7%208	2.2%175	2.2%202	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −6▼ −0.1 pp▲ +27▼ −0.4 pp▼ −33
Chicago citywide	1.6%20,789	1.8%26,012	1.9%27,207	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,418– 0.0 pp▲ +1,195▲ +0.3 pp▲ +5,223
Manufacturing	11.1%873	13.5%1,053	12.7%1,186	▲ +1.6 pp▲ +313▼ −0.7 pp▲ +133▲ +2.3 pp▲ +180
Chicago citywide	4.6%61,066	4.5%63,597	4.4%64,747	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,681▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,150▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,531
Wholesale Trade	6.2%485	6.7%527	5.1%471	▼ −1.1 pp▼ −14▼ −1.7 pp▼ −56▲ +0.5 pp▲ +42
Chicago citywide	3.0%39,431	2.9%41,789	2.8%41,460	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,029▼ −0.1 pp▼ −329▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,358
Retail Trade	11.1%871	10.7%840	25.2%2,352	▲ +14.1 pp▲ +1,481▲ +14.5 pp▲ +1,512▼ −0.4 pp▼ −31
Chicago citywide	7.4%97,262	6.9%97,836	6.6%96,413	▼ −0.8 pp▼ −849▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,423▼ −0.5 pp▲ +574
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	20.4%1,594	21.9%1,715	18.3%1,705	▼ −2.1 pp▲ +111▼ −3.6 pp▼ −10▲ +1.6 pp▲ +121
Chicago citywide	5.4%71,371	5.6%79,303	6.0%87,845	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +16,474▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,542▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,932
Utilities	0.6%50	0.0%0	0.0%0	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −50– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.6 pp▼ −50
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,383	0.3%4,956	0.3%5,012	– 0.0 pp▲ +629– 0.0 pp▲ +56– 0.0 pp▲ +573
Transportation & Warehousing	19.7%1,544	21.9%1,715	18.3%1,705	▼ −1.4 pp▲ +161▼ −3.6 pp▼ −10▲ +2.2 pp▲ +171
Chicago citywide	5.1%66,988	5.2%74,347	5.7%82,833	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +15,845▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,486▲ +0.1 pp▲ +7,359
Information	0.1%11	0.2%17	0.2%21	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10– 0.0 pp▲ +4▲ +0.1 pp▲ +6
Chicago citywide	3.1%40,514	3.4%48,135	3.5%51,095	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +10,581▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,960▲ +0.3 pp▲ +7,621
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	5.6%442	3.9%304	2.4%222	▼ −3.3 pp▼ −220▼ −1.5 pp▼ −82▼ −1.8 pp▼ −138
Chicago citywide	10.5%138,287	10.6%150,163	10.8%157,520	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +19,233▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,357▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,876
Finance & Insurance	4.2%327	3.1%244	1.7%163	▼ −2.4 pp▼ −164▼ −1.4 pp▼ −81▼ −1.1 pp▼ −83
Chicago citywide	8.5%111,307	8.4%119,147	8.6%125,824	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14,517▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,677▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7,840
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.5%115	0.8%60	0.6%59	▼ −0.8 pp▼ −56▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1▼ −0.7 pp▼ −55
Chicago citywide	2.1%26,980	2.2%31,016	2.2%31,696	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,716– 0.0 pp▲ +680▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,036
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	10.4%814	9.0%703	10.7%998	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +184▲ +1.7 pp▲ +295▼ −1.4 pp▼ −111
Chicago citywide	21.2%278,928	22.6%319,744	23.2%339,220	▲ +2.0 pp▲ +60,292▲ +0.6 pp▲ +19,476▲ +1.3 pp▲ +40,816
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	1.6%128	1.6%125	1.4%135	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +7▼ −0.2 pp▲ +10– 0.0 pp▼ −3
Chicago citywide	11.8%155,200	12.9%182,462	14.2%207,444	▲ +2.4 pp▲ +52,244▲ +1.3 pp▲ +24,982▲ +1.1 pp▲ +27,262
Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.1%6	0.0%0	2.5%231	▲ +2.4 pp▲ +225▲ +2.5 pp▲ +231▼ −0.1 pp▼ −6
Chicago citywide	1.0%13,619	1.2%16,600	1.2%16,872	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,253– 0.0 pp▲ +272▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,981
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	8.7%680	7.4%578	6.8%632	▼ −1.9 pp▼ −48▼ −0.6 pp▲ +54▼ −1.3 pp▼ −102
Chicago citywide	8.4%110,109	8.5%120,682	7.9%114,904	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +4,795▼ −0.7 pp▼ −5,778▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,573
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	12.6%986	11.4%892	8.0%749	▼ −4.6 pp▼ −237▼ −3.4 pp▼ −143▼ −1.2 pp▼ −94
Chicago citywide	23.5%308,633	22.1%313,540	23.0%336,089	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +27,456▲ +0.8 pp▲ +22,549▼ −1.4 pp▲ +4,907
Educational Services	3.0%237	2.9%229	2.1%200	▼ −0.9 pp▼ −37▼ −0.8 pp▼ −29▼ −0.1 pp▼ −8
Chicago citywide	10.1%132,909	9.0%128,169	9.2%134,671	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +1,762▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,502▼ −1.1 pp▼ −4,740
Health Care & Social Assistance	9.6%749	8.5%663	5.9%549	▼ −3.7 pp▼ −200▼ −2.6 pp▼ −114▼ −1.1 pp▼ −86
Chicago citywide	13.4%175,724	13.1%185,371	13.8%201,418	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +25,694▲ +0.7 pp▲ +16,047▼ −0.3 pp▲ +9,647
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	13.8%1,077	15.1%1,180	11.0%1,026	▼ −2.7 pp▼ −51▼ −4.1 pp▼ −154▲ +1.3 pp▲ +103
Chicago citywide	10.9%143,753	11.5%162,749	10.3%151,055	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,302▼ −1.2 pp▼ −11,694▲ +0.5 pp▲ +18,996
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	0.2%15	0.1%8	0.2%22	– 0.0 pp▲ +7▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14▼ −0.1 pp▼ −7
Chicago citywide	1.7%22,179	2.1%30,178	1.9%27,339	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +5,160▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,839▲ +0.4 pp▲ +7,999
Accommodation & Food Services	13.6%1,062	15.0%1,172	10.8%1,004	▼ −2.8 pp▼ −58▼ −4.2 pp▼ −168▲ +1.4 pp▲ +110
Chicago citywide	9.3%121,574	9.4%132,571	8.5%123,716	▼ −0.8 pp▲ +2,142▼ −0.9 pp▼ −8,855▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,997
Other Services	5.9%464	5.2%405	4.1%386	▼ −1.8 pp▼ −78▼ −1.0 pp▼ −19▼ −0.7 pp▼ −59
Chicago citywide	4.5%59,098	4.4%61,698	4.0%59,136	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +38▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,562▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,600
Public Administration	0.1%6	0.0%0	0.0%0	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −6– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.1 pp▼ −6
Chicago citywide	4.2%54,814	3.6%51,684	3.5%51,418	▼ −0.7 pp▼ −3,396▼ −0.1 pp▼ −266▼ −0.5 pp▼ −3,130

Earnings of Jobs in Ward 22

Category	Ward 22
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	14.1%1,313
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	31.7%2,952
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	54.3%5,058
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	14.1%1,313	12.7%185,297	▲ +1.4%	39/50
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	31.7%2,952	20.5%299,480	▲ +11.2%	25/50
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	54.3%5,058	66.9%978,851	▼ -12.6%	18/50
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	20.5%1,602	16.3%1,278	14.1%1,313	▼ −6.4 pp▼ −289▼ −2.3 pp▲ +35▼ −4.1 pp▼ −324
Chicago citywide	21.3%280,137	16.8%238,135	12.7%185,297	▼ −8.7 pp▼ −94,840▼ −4.1 pp▼ −52,838▼ −4.5 pp▼ −42,002
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	41.8%3,272	39.9%3,116	31.7%2,952	▼ −10.1 pp▼ −320▼ −8.2 pp▼ −164▼ −1.9 pp▼ −156
Chicago citywide	30.7%403,250	26.7%378,530	20.5%299,480	▼ −10.2 pp▼ −103,770▼ −6.3 pp▼ −79,050▼ −4.0 pp▼ −24,720
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	37.8%2,957	43.8%3,425	54.3%5,058	▲ +16.5 pp▲ +2,101▲ +10.4 pp▲ +1,633▲ +6.0 pp▲ +468
Chicago citywide	48.0%630,740	56.5%800,154	66.9%978,851	▲ +18.9 pp▲ +348,111▲ +10.4 pp▲ +178,697▲ +8.5 pp▲ +169,414

Jobs in Ward 22 by Firm Age

Category	Ward 22
Firm age: 0–1 years	1.1%97
Firm age: 2–3 years	1.5%139
Firm age: 4–5 years	3.4%312
Firm age: 6–10 years	5.9%536
Firm age: 11 or more years	88.1%8,028
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years	1.1%97	2.8%37,293	▼ -1.8%	49/50
Firm age: 2–3 years	1.5%139	2.8%37,154	▼ -1.3%	45/50
Firm age: 4–5 years	3.4%312	3.2%41,869	▲ +0.2%	23/50
Firm age: 6–10 years	5.9%536	7.8%102,354	▼ -1.9%	41/50
Firm age: 11 or more years	88.1%8,028	83.4%1,098,247	▲ +4.7%	8/50
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years	2.7%205	1.5%116	1.1%97	▼ −1.6 pp▼ −108▼ −0.5 pp▼ −19▼ −1.2 pp▼ −89
Chicago citywide	2.9%33,224	2.6%33,244	2.8%37,293	– 0.0 pp▲ +4,069▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,049▼ −0.2 pp▲ +20
Firm age: 2–3 years	3.4%261	7.1%540	1.5%139	▼ −1.9 pp▼ −122▼ −5.6 pp▼ −401▲ +3.7 pp▲ +279
Chicago citywide	4.0%46,935	3.3%42,284	2.8%37,154	▼ −1.2 pp▼ −9,781▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,130▼ −0.7 pp▼ −4,651
Firm age: 4–5 years	2.0%156	3.1%233	3.4%312	▲ +1.4 pp▲ +156▲ +0.4 pp▲ +79▲ +1.0 pp▲ +77
Chicago citywide	3.7%42,688	3.6%46,058	3.2%41,869	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −819▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,189▼ −0.1 pp▲ +3,370
Firm age: 6–10 years	9.3%713	6.4%486	5.9%536	▼ −3.5 pp▼ −177▼ −0.5 pp▲ +50▼ −2.9 pp▼ −227
Chicago citywide	8.2%94,955	8.6%109,934	7.8%102,354	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +7,399▼ −0.9 pp▼ −7,580▲ +0.5 pp▲ +14,979
Firm age: 11 or more years	82.5%6,296	81.9%6,226	88.1%8,028	▲ +5.6 pp▲ +1,732▲ +6.2 pp▲ +1,802▼ −0.6 pp▼ −70
Chicago citywide	81.3%946,852	81.8%1,043,037	83.4%1,098,247	▲ +2.1 pp▲ +151,395▲ +1.6 pp▲ +55,210▲ +0.5 pp▲ +96,185

Jobs in Ward 22 by Firm Size

Category	Ward 22
Firm size: 0–19 employees	19.4%1,766
Firm size: 20–49 employees	7.8%712
Firm size: 50–249 employees	15.4%1,400
Firm size: 250–499 employees	2.2%200
Firm size: 500 or more employees	55.2%5,034
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees	19.4%1,766	12.8%168,975	▲ +6.5%	30/50
Firm size: 20–49 employees	7.8%712	7.3%96,432	▲ +0.5%	34/50
Firm size: 50–249 employees	15.4%1,400	13.8%181,123	▲ +1.6%	30/50
Firm size: 250–499 employees	2.2%200	5.7%74,787	▼ -3.5%	37/50
Firm size: 500 or more employees	55.2%5,034	60.4%795,600	▼ -5.2%	16/50
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees	21.3%1,622	20.7%1,577	19.4%1,766	▼ −1.9 pp▲ +144▼ −1.4 pp▲ +189▼ −0.5 pp▼ −45
Chicago citywide	13.9%162,248	13.3%169,949	12.8%168,975	▼ −1.1 pp▲ +6,727▼ −0.5 pp▼ −974▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,701
Firm size: 20–49 employees	10.5%800	10.8%821	7.8%712	▼ −2.7 pp▼ −88▼ −3.0 pp▼ −109▲ +0.3 pp▲ +21
Chicago citywide	8.4%97,503	8.2%103,945	7.3%96,432	▼ −1.0 pp▼ −1,071▼ −0.8 pp▼ −7,513▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,442
Firm size: 50–249 employees	14.3%1,095	19.6%1,489	15.4%1,400	▲ +1.0 pp▲ +305▼ −4.2 pp▼ −89▲ +5.2 pp▲ +394
Chicago citywide	15.7%183,275	14.9%189,930	13.8%181,123	▼ −2.0 pp▼ −2,152▼ −1.1 pp▼ −8,807▼ −0.8 pp▲ +6,655
Firm size: 250–499 employees	8.5%651	2.2%166	2.2%200	▼ −6.3 pp▼ −451– 0.0 pp▲ +34▼ −6.3 pp▼ −485
Chicago citywide	6.3%72,992	5.9%74,603	5.7%74,787	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,795▼ −0.2 pp▲ +184▼ −0.4 pp▲ +1,611
Firm size: 500 or more employees	45.4%3,463	46.7%3,548	55.2%5,034	▲ +9.9 pp▲ +1,571▲ +8.6 pp▲ +1,486▲ +1.3 pp▲ +85
Chicago citywide	55.7%648,636	57.8%736,130	60.4%795,600	▲ +4.7 pp▲ +146,964▲ +2.7 pp▲ +59,470▲ +2.1 pp▲ +87,494

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 22
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	16.9% ±1.7 pp16.9%±1.7 pp8,231 ±815
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	89.6% ±3.9 pp15.2%±0.7 pp7,378 ±322
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	10.4% ±3.1 pp1.8%±0.5 pp853 ±257
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	16.9%±1.7 pp16.9%±1.7 pp8,231±815	13.5%±0.2 pp13.5%±0.2 pp365,577±5,480	▲ +3.4%▲ +3.4%	11/50
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	89.6%±3.9 pp15.2%±0.7 pp7,378±322	83.0%±0.5 pp11.2%±0.1 pp303,520±1,897	▲ +6.6%▲ +4.0%	15/5010/50
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	10.4%±3.1 pp1.8%±0.5 pp853±257	17.0%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.1 pp62,057±2,247	▼ -6.6%▼ -0.5%	36/5028/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 22
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	6.7% ±1.2 pp6.7%±1.2 pp3,269 ±576
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	74.8% ±9.2 pp5.0%±0.6 pp2,446 ±300
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	25.2% ±6.8 pp1.7%±0.5 pp822 ±222
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	82.7% ±8.7 pp5.6%±0.6 pp2,702 ±285
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	17.3% ±5.6 pp1.2%±0.4 pp566 ±183
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	6.7%±1.2 pp6.7%±1.2 pp3,269±576	7.4%±0.1 pp7.4%±0.1 pp201,851±4,036	▼ -0.7%▼ -0.7%	20/50
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	74.8%±9.2 pp5.0%±0.6 pp2,446±300	52.4%±0.7 pp3.9%±0.1 pp105,720±1,511	▲ +22.5%▲ +1.1%	9/505/50
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	25.2%±6.8 pp1.7%±0.5 pp822±222	47.6%±1.2 pp3.5%±0.1 pp96,131±2,437	▼ -22.5%▼ -1.9%	42/5034/50
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	82.7%±8.7 pp5.6%±0.6 pp2,702±285	67.0%±1.0 pp5.0%±0.1 pp135,301±1,945	▲ +15.6%▲ +0.6%	10/5013/50
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	17.3%±5.6 pp1.2%±0.4 pp566±183	33.0%±1.2 pp2.5%±0.1 pp66,550±2,459	▼ -15.6%▼ -1.3%	41/5036/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category	Ward 22
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	6.4% ±3.2 pp622 ±313
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	3.3% ±2.9 pp107 ±95
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	6.4%±3.2 pp622±313	5.9%±0.5 pp—	▲ +0.6%	17/50
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	3.3%±2.9 pp107±95	5.4%±0.6 pp—	▼ -2.1%	35/50
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category	Ward 22
Owner-Occupied Households	56.1% ±3.7 pp8,746 ±582
Renter-Occupied Households	43.9% ±4.5 pp6,846 ±707
Owner-Occupied Residents	60.6% ±3.7 pp29,137 ±1,762
Renter-Occupied Residents	39.4% ±4.7 pp18,944 ±2,245
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Owner-Occupied Households	56.1%±3.7 pp8,746±582	46.0%±0.4 pp534,012±4,939	▲ +10.1%	13/50
Renter-Occupied Households	43.9%±4.5 pp6,846±707	54.0%±0.4 pp626,193±5,183	▼ -10.1%	38/50
Owner-Occupied Residents	60.6%±3.7 pp29,137±1,762	51.8%±0.5 pp1,377,219±13,574	▲ +8.8%	14/50
Renter-Occupied Residents	39.4%±4.7 pp18,944±2,245	48.2%±0.5 pp1,280,665±13,500	▼ -8.8%	37/50
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category	Ward 22
Median Year Moved In	2008±1.7 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later	0.8% ±0.7 pp124 ±104
Moved in 2020 to 2022	12.0% ±2.4 pp1,862 ±380
Moved in 2010 to 2019	36.1% ±4.5 pp5,606 ±700
Moved in 2000 to 2009	17.0% ±2.9 pp2,648 ±455
Moved in 1990 to 1999	17.2% ±3.5 pp2,672 ±548
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	16.9% ±3.0 pp2,621 ±473
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Moved In	2008±1.7 yr	2015±1.0 yr	▼ −7	47/50
Moved in 2023 or Later	0.8%±0.7 pp124±104	5.9%±0.2 pp68,884±2,742	▼ -5.1%	50/50
Moved in 2020 to 2022	12.0%±2.4 pp1,862±380	24.1%±0.4 pp279,417±5,059	▼ -12.1%	46/50
Moved in 2010 to 2019	36.1%±4.5 pp5,606±700	39.2%±0.5 pp455,125±5,772	▼ -3.1%	39/50
Moved in 2000 to 2009	17.0%±2.9 pp2,648±455	13.8%±0.3 pp160,353±3,324	▲ +3.2%	10/50
Moved in 1990 to 1999	17.2%±3.5 pp2,672±548	8.2%±0.2 pp95,243±2,390	▲ +9.0%	2/50
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	16.9%±3.0 pp2,621±473	8.7%±0.2 pp101,183±2,362	▲ +8.2%	6/50
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 22
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	3.5% ±1.0 pp3.5%±1.0 pp1,688 ±480
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	2.9% ±0.9 pp83.2%±11.8 pp1,405 ±447
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	0.1% ±0.1 pp2.0%±3.2 pp34 ±56
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	0.1% ±0.1 pp1.5%±3.1 pp25 ±53
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	0.5% ±0.3 pp13.3%±9.1 pp224 ±167
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	3.5%±1.0 pp3.5%±1.0 pp1,688±480	14.0%±0.3 pp14.0%±0.3 pp375,475±8,289	▼ -10.5%▼ -10.5%	50/50
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	2.9%±0.9 pp83.2%±11.8 pp1,405±447	9.8%±0.3 pp69.9%±1.0 pp262,365±6,953	▼ -6.8%▲ +13.4%	49/509/50
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	0.1%±0.1 pp2.0%±3.2 pp34±56	0.8%±0.1 pp5.5%±0.4 pp20,552±1,626	▼ -0.7%▼ -3.5%	46/5039/50
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	0.1%±0.1 pp1.5%±3.1 pp25±53	2.5%±0.1 pp17.6%±0.7 pp65,936±2,918	▼ -2.4%▼ -16.1%	50/5050/50
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	0.5%±0.3 pp13.3%±9.1 pp224±167	1.0%±0.1 pp7.1%±0.8 pp26,622±3,040	▼ -0.5%▲ +6.2%	39/5010/50
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 22
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	5.4% ±1.3 pp5.4%±1.3 pp883 ±213
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	2.1% ±0.9 pp39.6%±14.1 pp350 ±150
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.1% ±0.4 pp2.6%±6.9 pp23 ±61
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.2% ±0.5 pp4.5%±8.9 pp40 ±79
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	2.9% ±1.2 pp53.3%±17.6 pp471 ±192
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	4.9% ±2.0 pp4.9%±2.0 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	0.3% ±0.7 pp0.3%±0.7 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	5.4%±1.3 pp5.4%±1.3 pp883±213	9.1%±0.2 pp9.1%±0.2 pp116,849±2,682	▼ -3.8%▼ -3.8%	46/50
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	2.1%±0.9 pp39.6%±14.1 pp350±150	2.5%±0.1 pp27.1%±1.4 pp31,723±1,796	▼ -0.4%▲ +12.5%	26/5010/50
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.1%±0.4 pp2.6%±6.9 pp23±61	0.6%±0.1 pp6.0%±0.7 pp7,037±795	▼ -0.4%▼ -3.4%	45/5042/50
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.2%±0.5 pp4.5%±8.9 pp40±79	0.2%±0.0 pp2.4%±0.5 pp2,831±587	0%▲ +2.1%	17/5012/50
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	2.9%±1.2 pp53.3%±17.6 pp471±192	5.9%±0.3 pp64.4%±2.5 pp75,258±3,387	▼ -3.0%▼ -11.1%	47/5041/50
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	4.9%±2.0 pp4.9%±2.0 pp—	4.8%±0.3 pp4.8%±0.3 pp—	▲ +0.1%▲ +0.1%	21/50
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	0.3%±0.7 pp0.3%±0.7 pp—	1.3%±0.1 pp1.3%±0.1 pp—	▼ -1.0%▼ -1.0%	46/50
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category	Ward 22
Median Year Built	1941±1 yr
Pre-1940	60.3% ±3.6 pp9,902 ±594
1940-2009	38.5% ±4.3 pp6,324 ±712
2010+	1.1% ±0.8 pp183 ±130
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Built	1941±1 yr	1953±1 yr	▼ −12 yrs	48/50
Pre-1940	60.3%±3.6 pp9,902±594	38.8%±0.4 pp495,715±4,678	▲ +21.5%	3/50
1940-2009	38.5%±4.3 pp6,324±712	54.9%±0.6 pp700,698±7,435	▼ -16.3%	46/50
2010+	1.1%±0.8 pp183±130	6.3%±0.2 pp80,641±2,725	▼ -5.2%	47/50
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category	Ward 22
Population Density	12,838 /sq mi±778/sq mi
Single-Family Homes	35.6% ±2.6 pp5,841 ±431
Buildings With 2–4 Units	55.8% ±5.1 pp9,150 ±844
Buildings With 5–19 Units	6.6% ±2.6 pp1,077 ±426
Buildings With 20 or More Units	2.0% ±1.0 pp323 ±172
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Population Density	12,838 /sq mi±778/sq mi	11,721 /sq mi±26/sq mi	▲ +1,117 /sq mi	25/50
Single-Family Homes	35.6%±2.6 pp5,841±431	29.2%±0.3 pp372,679±3,989	▲ +6.4%	19/50
Buildings With 2–4 Units	55.8%±5.1 pp9,150±844	27.4%±0.4 pp349,976±4,957	▲ +28.4%	3/50
Buildings With 5–19 Units	6.6%±2.6 pp1,077±426	16.2%±0.3 pp206,420±4,124	▼ -9.6%	42/50
Buildings With 20 or More Units	2.0%±1.0 pp323±172	27.0%±0.3 pp344,543±4,438	▼ -25.0%	47/50
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category	Ward 22
Studio	6.1% ±2.5 pp1,007 ±410
1 Bedroom	10.3% ±2.9 pp1,686 ±475
2 Bedrooms	38.1% ±4.1 pp6,244 ±679
3 Bedrooms	31.0% ±2.9 pp5,088 ±469
4 Bedrooms	10.0% ±2.1 pp1,648 ±346
5 or More Bedrooms	4.5% ±1.4 pp736 ±229
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Studio	6.1%±2.5 pp1,007±410	7.5%±0.3 pp95,749±3,205	▼ -1.4%	15/50
1 Bedroom	10.3%±2.9 pp1,686±475	20.1%±0.4 pp257,271±4,939	▼ -9.9%	40/50
2 Bedrooms	38.1%±4.1 pp6,244±679	33.1%±0.3 pp422,866±4,221	▲ +4.9%	13/50
3 Bedrooms	31.0%±2.9 pp5,088±469	26.1%±0.3 pp333,682±4,061	▲ +4.9%	20/50
4 Bedrooms	10.0%±2.1 pp1,648±346	9.0%±0.2 pp115,453±2,426	▲ +1.0%	23/50
5 or More Bedrooms	4.5%±1.4 pp736±229	4.1%±0.2 pp52,033±2,072	▲ +0.4%	24/50
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 22
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	10.3% ±2.4 pp10.3%±2.4 pp1,599 ±370
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	5.4% ±1.6 pp52.9%±10.0 pp846 ±253
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	4.8% ±1.8 pp47.1%±13.4 pp753 ±276
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	10.3%±2.4 pp10.3%±2.4 pp1,599±370	3.4%±0.2 pp3.4%±0.2 pp39,979±1,996	▲ +6.8%▲ +6.8%	1/50
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	5.4%±1.6 pp52.9%±10.0 pp846±253	2.0%±0.1 pp58.2%±2.3 pp23,276±1,493	▲ +3.4%▼ -5.3%	4/5035/50
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	4.8%±1.8 pp47.1%±13.4 pp753±276	1.4%±0.1 pp41.8%±2.6 pp16,703±1,328	▲ +3.4%▲ +5.3%	1/5016/50
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category	Ward 22
Natural Gas Heat	93.3% ±2.4 pp14,490 ±370
Electric Heat	5.3% ±1.6 pp818 ±248
Other Heating Source	1.5% ±1.1 pp225 ±172
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Natural Gas Heat	93.3%±2.4 pp14,490±370	77.5%±0.3 pp899,660±3,501	▲ +15.7%	2/50
Electric Heat	5.3%±1.6 pp818±248	18.0%±0.3 pp208,937±3,864	▼ -12.7%	50/50
Other Heating Source	1.5%±1.1 pp225±172	4.4%±0.2 pp51,603±2,173	▼ -3.0%	49/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show

Category	Ward 22
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	40.4% ±3.4 pp6,268 ±525
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	21.2% ±3.7 pp3,301 ±572
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	38.4% ±4.6 pp5,964 ±715
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	17.9% ±3.1 pp2,784 ±485
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	29.4% ±6.4 pp1,882 ±412
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	22.2% ±6.6 pp1,423 ±422
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	48.3% ±6.1 pp3,090 ±391
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	22.4% ±3.5 pp1,430 ±225
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	48.3% ±3.5 pp4,211 ±303
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	20.4% ±4.1 pp1,783 ±360
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	31.3% ±6.3 pp2,727 ±551
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	14.5% ±4.7 pp1,265 ±406
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	30.8% ±5.5 pp1,248 ±225
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	28.5% ±7.1 pp1,154 ±288
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	40.7% ±9.3 pp1,650 ±378
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	21.6% ±9.2 pp873 ±374
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage and a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	63.5% ±3.6 pp2,963 ±170
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	13.5% ±4.3 pp629 ±200
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	23.1% ±8.3 pp1,077 ±387
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	8.4% ±3.1 pp392 ±144
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage and with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	40.4%±3.4 pp6,268±525	24.9%±0.4 pp289,047±4,524	▲ +15.4%	22/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	21.2%±3.7 pp3,301±572	23.8%±0.4 pp276,514±4,291	▼ -2.6%	26/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	38.4%±4.6 pp5,964±715	45.6%±0.5 pp529,378±5,291	▼ -7.2%	25/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	17.9%±3.1 pp2,784±485	24.0%±0.4 pp278,684±4,167	▼ -6.1%	31/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	29.4%±6.4 pp1,882±412	26.4%±0.5 pp155,936±3,134	▲ +3.0%	19/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	22.2%±6.6 pp1,423±422	25.3%±0.5 pp149,215±2,939	▼ -3.0%	31/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	48.3%±6.1 pp3,090±391	48.3%±0.7 pp285,567±4,222	0%	28/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	22.4%±3.5 pp1,430±225	25.5%±0.6 pp150,346±3,554	▼ -3.1%	33/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	48.3%±3.5 pp4,211±303	51.6%±0.6 pp272,277±2,904	▼ -3.3%	33/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	20.4%±4.1 pp1,783±360	19.6%±0.5 pp103,661±2,759	▲ +0.8%	21/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	31.3%±6.3 pp2,727±551	28.8%±0.6 pp151,994±3,034	▲ +2.5%	17/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	14.5%±4.7 pp1,265±406	13.8%±0.4 pp73,053±2,233	▲ +0.7%	21/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	30.8%±5.5 pp1,248±225	42.8%±0.7 pp146,216±2,365	▼ -12.0%	47/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	28.5%±7.1 pp1,154±288	23.9%±0.7 pp81,659±2,408	▲ +4.6%	7/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	40.7%±9.3 pp1,650±378	33.3%±0.8 pp113,882±2,596	▲ +7.4%	11/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	21.6%±9.2 pp873±374	15.4%±0.5 pp52,632±1,873	▲ +6.2%	6/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage and a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	63.5%±3.6 pp2,963±170	67.7%±0.9 pp126,058±1,613	▼ -4.2%	37/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	13.5%±4.3 pp629±200	11.8%±0.7 pp22,000±1,275	▲ +1.7%	16/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	23.1%±8.3 pp1,077±387	20.5%±0.8 pp38,106±1,492	▲ +2.6%	16/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	8.4%±3.1 pp392±144	11.0%±0.6 pp20,421±1,202	▼ -2.6%	41/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage and with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category	Ward 22
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$531±$28
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$767±$41
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$1,056±$69
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,535±$100
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$2,143±$122
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$531±$28	$594±$11	▼ −$63	31/50
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$767±$41	$1,011±$8	▼ −$244	44/50
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$1,056±$69	$1,560±$10	▼ −$504	49/50
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,535±$100	$2,329±$13	▼ −$794	45/50
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$2,143±$122	Over $3,000	▼ −$857+	42/50
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$584 ±29	$602 ±28	$531 ±28	▼ −$53▼ −$72▲ +$19
Chicago citywide	$609 ±7	$606 ±7	$594 ±11	▼ −$15▼ −$12▼ −$2
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$441 ±22	$491 ±23	$531 ±28	▲ +$90▲ +$40▲ +$50
Chicago citywide	$459 ±6	$494 ±6	$594 ±11	▲ +$135▲ +$100▲ +$35
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$809 ±23	$811 ±28	$767 ±41	▼ −$42▼ −$43▲ +$1
Chicago citywide	$992 ±5	$1,001 ±5	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$19▲ +$10▲ +$9
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$611 ±18	$661 ±23	$767 ±41	▲ +$157▲ +$107▲ +$50
Chicago citywide	$748 ±3	$816 ±4	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$262▲ +$195▲ +$67
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,057 ±26	$1,060 ±26	$1,056 ±69	▼ −$2▼ −$5▲ +$3
Chicago citywide	$1,493 ±8	$1,523 ±6	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$67▲ +$37▲ +$29
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$798 ±20	$864 ±21	$1,056 ±69	▲ +$258▲ +$191▲ +$66
Chicago citywide	$1,127 ±6	$1,241 ±5	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$433▲ +$319▲ +$114
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,613 ±82	$1,538 ±55	$1,535 ±100	▼ −$78▼ −$3▼ −$75
Chicago citywide	$2,333 ±12	$2,326 ±10	$2,329 ±13	▼ −$4▲ +$3▼ −$7
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,217 ±62	$1,254 ±45	$1,535 ±100	▲ +$318▲ +$282▲ +$36
Chicago citywide	$1,761 ±9	$1,896 ±8	$2,329 ±13	▲ +$569▲ +$434▲ +$135
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,387 ±90	$2,142 ±89	$2,143 ±122	▼ −$244▲ +$1▼ −$245
Chicago citywide	—	$3,316 ±20	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,801 ±68	$1,746 ±73	$2,143 ±122	▲ +$342▲ +$397▼ −$55
Chicago citywide	—	$2,703 ±16	—	———

Rent

Rent measure

Category	Ward 22
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$1,098±$38
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$761±$62
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$869±$42
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$1,054±$55
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,287±$77
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,651±$195
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$1,098±$38	$1,613±$12	▼ −$515	49/50
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$761±$62	$696±$20	▲ +$65	25/50
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$869±$42	$1,043±$8	▼ −$174	41/50
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$1,054±$55	$1,440±$10	▼ −$386	49/50
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,287±$77	$2,021±$21	▼ −$734	50/50
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,651±$195	$2,738±$29	▼ −$1,087	49/50
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22
Average Rent	$874±$17
10th Percentile Rent	$594±$47
25th Percentile Rent	$718±$45
Median Rent	$878±$38
75th Percentile Rent	$1,018±$49
90th Percentile Rent	$1,205±$52
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent	$874±$17	$1,452±$11	▼ −$578	49/50
10th Percentile Rent	$594±$47	$564±$21	▲ +$29	26/50
25th Percentile Rent	$718±$45	$913±$7	▼ −$195	43/50
Median Rent	$878±$38	$1,262±$12	▼ −$384	49/50
75th Percentile Rent	$1,018±$49	$1,868±$13	▼ −$850	50/50
90th Percentile Rent	$1,205±$52	$2,528±$38	▼ −$1,323	50/50
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category	Ward 22
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,939±$117
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,192±$116
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,543±$99
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,894±$102
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,271±$87
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,522±$177
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,939±$117	$2,734±$24	▼ −$794	38/50
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,192±$116	$1,270±$14	▼ −$78	29/50
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,543±$99	$1,697±$14	▼ −$154	31/50
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,894±$102	$2,339±$17	▼ −$445	33/50
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,271±$87	$3,269±$31	▼ −$998	40/50
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,522±$177	Over $4,000	▼ −$1,478+	45/50
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,151 ±88	$1,890 ±63	$1,939 ±117	▼ −$212▲ +$49▼ −$261
Chicago citywide	$2,855 ±19	$2,793 ±23	$2,734 ±24	▼ −$121▼ −$60▼ −$61
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,624 ±67	$1,541 ±51	$1,939 ±117	▲ +$316▲ +$399▼ −$83
Chicago citywide	$2,154 ±14	$2,277 ±19	$2,734 ±24	▲ +$579▲ +$457▲ +$122
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,263 ±124	$1,153 ±78	$1,192 ±116	▼ −$71▲ +$38▼ −$109
Chicago citywide	$1,403 ±11	$1,356 ±11	$1,270 ±14	▼ −$133▼ −$86▼ −$47
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$953 ±93	$940 ±63	$1,192 ±116	▲ +$239▲ +$252▼ −$13
Chicago citywide	$1,059 ±8	$1,105 ±9	$1,270 ±14	▲ +$212▲ +$165▲ +$46
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,589 ±82	$1,448 ±84	$1,543 ±99	▼ −$45▲ +$96▼ −$141
Chicago citywide	$1,874 ±12	$1,800 ±12	$1,697 ±14	▼ −$177▼ −$103▼ −$74
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,199 ±62	$1,180 ±68	$1,543 ±99	▲ +$344▲ +$363▼ −$19
Chicago citywide	$1,414 ±9	$1,467 ±10	$1,697 ±14	▲ +$283▲ +$230▲ +$53
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,058 ±91	$1,831 ±77	$1,894 ±102	▼ −$165▲ +$62▼ −$227
Chicago citywide	$2,526 ±13	$2,422 ±13	$2,339 ±17	▼ −$187▼ −$83▼ −$103
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,553 ±69	$1,493 ±63	$1,894 ±102	▲ +$340▲ +$401▼ −$61
Chicago citywide	$1,906 ±10	$1,974 ±11	$2,339 ±17	▲ +$433▲ +$365▲ +$68
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,559 ±82	$2,315 ±77	$2,271 ±87	▼ −$288▼ −$44▼ −$244
Chicago citywide	$3,447 ±25	$3,343 ±25	$3,269 ±31	▼ −$178▼ −$74▼ −$104
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,931 ±62	$1,887 ±63	$2,271 ±87	▲ +$340▲ +$384▼ −$45
Chicago citywide	$2,601 ±19	$2,724 ±20	$3,269 ±31	▲ +$668▲ +$544▲ +$123
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$3,248 ±229	$2,791 ±121	$2,522 ±177	▼ −$726▼ −$269▼ −$457
Chicago citywide	—	$4,578 ±59	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$2,451 ±173	$2,275 ±99	$2,522 ±177	▲ +$71▲ +$247▼ −$176
Chicago citywide	—	$3,731 ±48	—	———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category	Ward 22
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$718±$52
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$392±$38
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$531±$25
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$676±$47
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$864±$42
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,060±$104
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$718±$52	$1,078±$22	▼ −$360	44/50
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$392±$38	$418±$8	▼ −$27	36/50
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$531±$25	$601±$8	▼ −$70	39/50
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$676±$47	$859±$10	▼ −$183	41/50
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$864±$42	$1,197±$18	▼ −$333	45/50
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,060±$104	Over $1,500	▼ −$440+	46/50
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$722 ±44	$755 ±31	$718 ±52	▼ −$4▼ −$37▲ +$33
Chicago citywide	$957 ±15	$1,028 ±10	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$121▲ +$50▲ +$71
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$545 ±33	$615 ±25	$718 ±52	▲ +$173▲ +$102▲ +$70
Chicago citywide	$722 ±11	$838 ±8	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$355▲ +$240▲ +$116
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$400 ±42	$466 ±36	$392 ±38	▼ −$9▼ −$75▲ +$66
Chicago citywide	$429 ±6	$469 ±7	$418 ±8	▼ −$11▼ −$51▲ +$40
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$302 ±32	$380 ±29	$392 ±38	▲ +$90▲ +$11▲ +$78
Chicago citywide	$324 ±5	$382 ±5	$418 ±8	▲ +$95▲ +$36▲ +$59
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$521 ±36	$580 ±35	$531 ±25	▲ +$9▼ −$50▲ +$59
Chicago citywide	$586 ±6	$629 ±6	$601 ±8	▲ +$14▼ −$28▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$393 ±27	$473 ±29	$531 ±25	▲ +$137▲ +$58▲ +$80
Chicago citywide	$442 ±4	$513 ±5	$601 ±8	▲ +$158▲ +$88▲ +$70
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$683 ±35	$719 ±30	$676 ±47	▼ −$7▼ −$43▲ +$36
Chicago citywide	$815 ±9	$860 ±7	$859 ±10	▲ +$44▼ −$1▲ +$45
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$516 ±26	$586 ±25	$676 ±47	▲ +$161▲ +$90▲ +$70
Chicago citywide	$615 ±7	$701 ±6	$859 ±10	▲ +$244▲ +$158▲ +$86
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$870 ±55	$901 ±37	$864 ±42	▼ −$6▼ −$38▲ +$31
Chicago citywide	—	$1,206 ±14	$1,197 ±18	—▼ −$9—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$657 ±41	$735 ±30	$864 ±42	▲ +$207▲ +$129▲ +$78
Chicago citywide	—	$983 ±12	$1,197 ±18	—▲ +$214—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$1,116 ±109	$1,060 ±104	—▼ −$55—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,767 ±35	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$909 ±89	$1,060 ±104	—▲ +$151—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,440 ±28	—	———

Home Values

Category	Ward 22
Average Home Value	$264,774±$23,596
10th Percentile Home Value	$120,336±$25,387
25th Percentile Home Value	$188,093±$12,560
Median Home Value	$243,832±$10,975
75th Percentile Home Value	$316,909±$20,204
90th Percentile Home Value	$386,578±$12,805
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Average Home Value	$264,774±$23,596	$437,638±$7,358	▼ −$172,864	40/50
10th Percentile Home Value	$120,336±$25,387	$129,150±$3,756	▼ −$8,815	32/50
25th Percentile Home Value	$188,093±$12,560	$217,800±$1,804	▼ −$29,707	35/50
Median Home Value	$243,832±$10,975	$334,100±$2,424	▼ −$90,268	37/50
75th Percentile Home Value	$316,909±$20,204	$497,700±$3,730	▼ −$180,791	40/50
90th Percentile Home Value	$386,578±$12,805	$809,159±$15,691	▼ −$422,582	40/50
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$197,763 ±8,310	$208,370 ±13,401	$264,774 ±23,596	▲ +$67,011▲ +$56,404▲ +$10,607
Chicago citywide	$386,614 ±5,106	$424,380 ±4,754	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$51,024▲ +$13,258▲ +$37,766
Average Home Value (nominal dollars)	$149,249 ±6,272	$169,822 ±10,921	$264,774 ±23,596	▲ +$115,525▲ +$94,952▲ +$20,573
Chicago citywide	$291,771 ±3,853	$345,871 ±3,874	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$145,867▲ +$91,768▲ +$54,099
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$101,739 ±12,332	$111,932 ±9,507	$120,336 ±25,387	▲ +$18,596▲ +$8,403▲ +$10,193
Chicago citywide	$115,330 ±1,421	$124,313 ±1,339	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$13,821▲ +$4,838▲ +$8,983
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$76,781 ±9,307	$91,225 ±7,748	$120,336 ±25,387	▲ +$43,555▲ +$29,110▲ +$14,444
Chicago citywide	$87,037 ±1,072	$101,315 ±1,091	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$42,113▲ +$27,835▲ +$14,278
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$143,408 ±5,594	$147,411 ±7,332	$188,093 ±12,560	▲ +$44,685▲ +$40,682▲ +$4,003
Chicago citywide	$190,543 ±2,400	$199,018 ±1,255	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$27,257▲ +$18,782▲ +$8,475
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$108,228 ±4,221	$120,140 ±5,975	$188,093 ±12,560	▲ +$79,865▲ +$67,953▲ +$11,912
Chicago citywide	$143,800 ±1,811	$162,200 ±1,023	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$74,000▲ +$55,600▲ +$18,400
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$196,971 ±7,474	$200,249 ±4,242	$243,832 ±10,975	▲ +$46,861▲ +$43,582▲ +$3,279
Chicago citywide	$299,066 ±2,120	$316,564 ±2,118	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$35,034▲ +$17,536▲ +$17,498
Median Home Value (nominal dollars)	$148,651 ±5,641	$163,204 ±3,457	$243,832 ±10,975	▲ +$95,181▲ +$80,628▲ +$14,553
Chicago citywide	$225,700 ±1,600	$258,000 ±1,726	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$108,400▲ +$76,100▲ +$32,300
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$248,953 ±11,685	$240,464 ±7,115	$316,909 ±20,204	▲ +$67,956▲ +$76,445▼ −$8,489
Chicago citywide	$466,951 ±3,138	$490,797 ±3,892	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$30,749▲ +$6,903▲ +$23,846
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$187,881 ±8,819	$195,979 ±5,799	$316,909 ±20,204	▲ +$129,028▲ +$120,930▲ +$8,098
Chicago citywide	$352,400 ±2,368	$400,000 ±3,172	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$145,300▲ +$97,700▲ +$47,600
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$325,249 ±29,022	$306,353 ±20,025	$386,578 ±12,805	▲ +$61,329▲ +$80,225▼ −$18,896
Chicago citywide	$739,174 ±12,945	$835,769 ±9,047	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$69,986▼ −$26,610▲ +$96,595
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$245,460 ±21,903	$249,678 ±16,320	$386,578 ±12,805	▲ +$141,118▲ +$136,899▲ +$4,218
Chicago citywide	$557,842 ±9,770	$681,153 ±7,373	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$251,317▲ +$128,006▲ +$123,311

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 22
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	1.5%1.5%242
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.8%57.0%138
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.4%29.3%71
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.1%10.3%25
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.1%3.3%8
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	1.5%1.5%242	8.3%8.3%106,578	▼ -6.9%▼ -6.9%	44/50
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.8%57.0%138	4.8%57.2%60,910	▼ -3.9%▼ -0.1%	45/5029/50
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.4%29.3%71	1.1%13.8%14,721	▼ -0.7%▲ +15.5%	24/507/50
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.1%10.3%25	2.1%25.7%27,383	▼ -2.0%▼ -15.4%	39/5035/50
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.1%3.3%8	0.3%3.3%3,564	▼ -0.2%0%	30/5014/50
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units	1.5%246	1.5%240	1.5%242	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −4▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2– 0.0 pp▼ −6
Chicago citywide	8.8%104,550	8.5%103,479	8.3%106,578	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,028▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,099▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,071
Housing Choice Vouchers	0.9%143	0.8%127	0.8%138	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −5– 0.0 pp▲ +11▼ −0.1 pp▼ −16
Chicago citywide	4.3%51,601	4.6%55,987	4.8%60,910	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +9,309▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,923▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,386
Public Housing	0.5%72	0.5%79	0.4%71	– 0.0 pp▼ −1▼ −0.1 pp▼ −8▲ +0.1 pp▲ +7
Chicago citywide	1.8%21,159	1.3%16,094	1.2%14,721	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −6,438▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,373▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,065
Project-Based Section 8	0.1%23	0.2%26	0.2%25	– 0.0 pp▲ +2– 0.0 pp▼ −1– 0.0 pp▲ +3
Chicago citywide	2.2%25,940	2.2%26,951	2.1%27,383	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,443▼ −0.1 pp▲ +432– 0.0 pp▲ +1,011
Other Project-Based Programs	0.1%8	0.1%8	0.0%8	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,850	0.4%4,447	0.3%3,564	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,286▼ −0.1 pp▼ −883▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,403

Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category	Ward 22
Average Household Income	$19,587
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$487
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,350
Below 30% of Area Median Income	76.2%128
With Children	52.5%88
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	32.5%55
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this ward. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this ward. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this ward.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$19,587	$17,032	▲ +$2,555	9/50
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$487	$425	▲ +$62	9/50
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,350	$1,389	▼ -$39	23/50
Below 30% of Area Median Income	76.2%128	83.0%77,427	▼ -6.8 pp	46/50
With Children	52.5%88	31.0%28,919	▲ +21.5 pp	2/50
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	32.5%55	32.0%29,852	▲ +0.5 pp	26/50
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this ward. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this ward. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this ward.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income	$12,586	$15,918	$19,577	▲ +$6,991▲ +$3,659▲ +$3,332
Chicago citywide	$12,156	$13,665	$17,032	▲ +$4,876▲ +$3,367▲ +$1,509
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$344	$407	$487	▲ +$143▲ +$79▲ +$63
Chicago citywide	$310	$340	$425	▲ +$115▲ +$85▲ +$30
Average Monthly Government Spending	$909	$1,015	$1,347	▲ +$438▲ +$333▲ +$105
Chicago citywide	$916	$1,017	$1,389	▲ +$473▲ +$372▲ +$101
Below 30% of Area Median Income	79.3%—	69.9%—	76.3%—	▼ −3.1 pp—▲ +6.4 pp—▼ −9.4 pp—
Chicago citywide	80.0%—	81.0%—	83.0%—	▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +2.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children	—	—	52.6%—	——————
Chicago citywide	—	—	31.0%—	——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	27.8%—	30.6%—	32.5%—	▲ +4.8 pp—▲ +1.9 pp—▲ +2.9 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category	Ward 22
Total Tree Canopy	12.2%314 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	65.8%1,685 acres
Natural Open Surfaces	22.0%564 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Total Tree Canopy	12.2%314 acres	18.4%25,934 acres	▼ -6.1%	43/50
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	65.8%1,685 acres	60.2%84,955 acres	▲ +5.6%	25/50
Natural Open Surfaces	22.0%564 acres	21.5%30,331 acres	▲ +0.5%	12/50
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category	Ward 22
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	15.7% ±3.4 pp7,628 ±1,650
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	46.8% ±4.1 pp22,744 ±1,981
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	37.4% ±3.7 pp18,181 ±1,808
Homes Without Air Conditioning	3.9%1,917
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	15.7%±3.4 pp7,628±1,650	26.1%±0.5 pp708,175±13,883	▼ -10.4%	50/50
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	46.8%±4.1 pp22,744±1,981	44.1%±0.6 pp1,195,501±15,477	▲ +2.7%	12/50
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	37.4%±3.7 pp18,181±1,808	29.8%±0.5 pp807,550±13,776	▲ +7.7%	12/50
Homes Without Air Conditioning	3.9%1,917	4.2%114,618	▼ -0.3%	30/50
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category	Ward 22
Drove Alone	63.9% ±3.4 pp11,893 ±629
Carpooled	13.6% ±2.7 pp2,531 ±497
Public Transit	13.7% ±3.5 pp2,559 ±658
Walked	6.1% ±1.7 pp1,128 ±316
Bikes	0.5% ±0.5 pp91 ±100
Other Commute Mode	1.3% ±0.7 pp235 ±125
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Drove Alone	63.9%±3.4 pp11,893±629	56.6%±0.4 pp772,696±5,998	▲ +7.3%	15/50
Carpooled	13.6%±2.7 pp2,531±497	9.3%±0.3 pp126,918±3,980	▲ +4.3%	9/50
Public Transit	13.7%±3.5 pp2,559±658	22.4%±0.4 pp305,691±6,011	▼ -8.7%	41/50
Walked	6.1%±1.7 pp1,128±316	7.3%±0.3 pp100,269±3,456	▼ -1.3%	17/50
Bikes	0.5%±0.5 pp91±100	1.8%±0.1 pp24,441±1,693	▼ -1.3%	32/50
Other Commute Mode	1.3%±0.7 pp235±125	2.5%±0.1 pp34,356±1,772	▼ -1.3%	27/50
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category	Ward 22
Average Commute Time (minutes)	30 min±1.7 min
Less Than 15 Minutes	17.9% ±2.9 pp3,302 ±541
15–29 Minutes	33.5% ±3.7 pp6,188 ±679
30–44 Minutes	23.8% ±3.5 pp4,391 ±650
45–59 Minutes	11.5% ±2.4 pp2,133 ±450
60 Minutes or More	13.3% ±2.9 pp2,454 ±536
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes)	30 min±1.7 min	33 min±0.2 min	▼ −3 min	37/50
Less Than 15 Minutes	17.9%±2.9 pp3,302±541	13.0%±0.3 pp140,252±3,438	▲ +4.9%	8/50
15–29 Minutes	33.5%±3.7 pp6,188±679	29.9%±0.5 pp322,586±5,056	▲ +3.6%	12/50
30–44 Minutes	23.8%±3.5 pp4,391±650	29.6%±0.4 pp318,782±4,584	▼ -5.8%	44/50
45–59 Minutes	11.5%±2.4 pp2,133±450	14.0%±0.3 pp151,451±3,075	▼ -2.5%	38/50
60 Minutes or More	13.3%±2.9 pp2,454±536	13.4%±0.3 pp144,940±3,715	▼ -0.2%	25/50
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category	Ward 22
Average Vehicles per Household	1.51±0.12
Households With No Vehicle	20.2% ±3.7 pp3,138 ±579
Households With 1 Vehicle	33.4% ±3.7 pp5,193 ±571
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	46.4% ±4.7 pp7,202 ±726
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Average Vehicles per Household	1.51±0.12	1.12±0.01	▲ +0.39	10/50
Households With No Vehicle	20.2%±3.7 pp3,138±579	26.6%±0.4 pp308,497±5,087	▼ -6.4%	30/50
Households With 1 Vehicle	33.4%±3.7 pp5,193±571	45.2%±0.4 pp524,900±5,145	▼ -11.8%	47/50
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	46.4%±4.7 pp7,202±726	28.2%±0.4 pp326,808±4,200	▲ +18.2%	9/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Ward 22 Residents Work

Category	Ward 22
Loop	12.1%1,825
South Lawndale	5.3%794
Near North Side	5.2%781
Near West Side	5.1%766
Lower West Side	2.8%428
All other city neighborhoods	26.4%3,979
Outside the city	43.1%6,482
↳ Cicero town, IL	2.3%346
↳ Bedford Park village, IL	1.7%250
↳ Melrose Park village, IL	1.1%166
↳ Elk Grove Village village, IL	0.8%121
↳ Berwyn city, IL	0.8%113
↳ All other Illinois locations	34.4%5,178
Out of state	2.0%308
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for ward 22 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference
Loop	12.1%1,825	21.5%259,168	▼ -9.4%
South Lawndale	5.3%794	0.6%7,387	▲ +4.7%
Near North Side	5.2%781	9.1%109,334	▼ -3.9%
Near West Side	5.1%766	6.7%80,119	▼ -1.6%
Lower West Side	2.8%428	1.0%12,477	▲ +1.8%
All other city neighborhoods	26.4%3,979	21.1%253,663	▲ +5.4%
Outside the city	43.1%6,482	35.9%432,365	▲ +7.2%
↳ Cicero town, IL	2.3%346	0.5%6,087	▲ +1.8%
↳ Bedford Park village, IL	1.7%250	0.6%6,897	▲ +1.1%
↳ Melrose Park village, IL	1.1%166	0.4%5,320	▲ +0.7%
↳ Elk Grove Village village, IL	0.8%121	0.7%8,181	▲ +0.1%
↳ Berwyn city, IL	0.8%113	0.2%2,382	▲ +0.6%
↳ All other Illinois locations	34.4%5,178	27.4%330,297	▲ +7.0%
Out of state	2.0%308	2.2%26,136	▼ -0.1%
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for ward 22 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Loop	12.1%1,795	11.7%1,775	12.1%1,825	– 0.0 pp▲ +30▲ +0.4 pp▲ +50▼ −0.4 pp▼ −20
Chicago citywide	20.0%224,635	21.0%252,791	21.5%259,168	▲ +1.5 pp▲ +34,533▲ +0.5 pp▲ +6,377▲ +1.0 pp▲ +28,156
South Lawndale	3.9%584	4.7%711	5.3%794	▲ +1.3 pp▲ +210▲ +0.6 pp▲ +83▲ +0.8 pp▲ +127
Chicago citywide	0.6%6,180	0.5%6,267	0.6%7,387	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,207▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,120– 0.0 pp▲ +87
Near North Side	4.1%614	5.3%796	5.2%781	▲ +1.1 pp▲ +167▼ −0.1 pp▼ −15▲ +1.1 pp▲ +182
Chicago citywide	8.2%92,142	9.4%112,858	9.1%109,334	▲ +0.9 pp▲ +17,192▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3,524▲ +1.2 pp▲ +20,716
Near West Side	5.4%800	5.7%858	5.1%766	▼ −0.3 pp▼ −34▼ −0.6 pp▼ −92▲ +0.3 pp▲ +58
Chicago citywide	6.2%69,083	6.6%79,757	6.7%80,119	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +11,036– 0.0 pp▲ +362▲ +0.5 pp▲ +10,674
Lower West Side	2.7%408	2.1%325	2.8%428	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +20▲ +0.7 pp▲ +103▼ −0.6 pp▼ −83
Chicago citywide	0.9%9,585	0.8%9,912	1.0%12,477	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,892▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,565– 0.0 pp▲ +327
All other city neighborhoods	28.4%4,216	27.3%4,125	26.4%3,979	▼ −2.0 pp▼ −237▼ −0.8 pp▼ −146▼ −1.1 pp▼ −91
Chicago citywide	22.9%257,015	21.5%259,132	21.1%253,663	▼ −1.8 pp▼ −3,352▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,469▼ −1.4 pp▲ +2,117
Outside the city	43.1%6,400	42.8%6,480	43.1%6,482	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +82▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2▼ −0.3 pp▲ +80
Chicago citywide	36.8%412,807	35.7%430,135	35.9%432,365	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +19,558▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,230▼ −1.0 pp▲ +17,328
Cicero town, IL	2.7%394	2.3%348	2.3%346	▼ −0.4 pp▼ −48– 0.0 pp▼ −2▼ −0.4 pp▼ −46
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,256	0.5%6,120	0.5%6,087	– 0.0 pp▲ +831– 0.0 pp▼ −33– 0.0 pp▲ +864
Bedford Park village, IL	1.7%246	1.5%228	1.7%250	– 0.0 pp▲ +4▲ +0.2 pp▲ +22▼ −0.2 pp▼ −18
Chicago citywide	0.8%8,547	0.7%8,008	0.6%6,897	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,650▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,111▼ −0.1 pp▼ −539
Melrose Park village, IL	0.7%97	0.9%130	1.1%166	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +69▲ +0.2 pp▲ +36▲ +0.2 pp▲ +33
Chicago citywide	0.4%4,646	0.4%5,298	0.4%5,320	– 0.0 pp▲ +674– 0.0 pp▲ +22– 0.0 pp▲ +652
Elk Grove Village village, IL	1.1%170	0.9%142	0.8%121	▼ −0.3 pp▼ −49▼ −0.1 pp▼ −21▼ −0.2 pp▼ −28
Chicago citywide	0.8%8,559	0.8%10,071	0.7%8,181	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −378▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,890▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,512
Berwyn city, IL	0.9%137	1.0%157	0.8%113	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −24▼ −0.3 pp▼ −44▲ +0.1 pp▲ +20
Chicago citywide	0.3%3,090	0.2%2,604	0.2%2,382	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −708– 0.0 pp▼ −222▼ −0.1 pp▼ −486
All other Illinois locations	33.9%5,029	34.2%5,168	34.4%5,178	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +149▲ +0.2 pp▲ +10▲ +0.3 pp▲ +139
Chicago citywide	28.0%314,112	27.1%326,235	27.4%330,297	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +16,185▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,062▼ −0.9 pp▲ +12,123
Out of state	1.8%266	1.9%294	2.0%308	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +42▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14▲ +0.2 pp▲ +28
Chicago citywide	2.2%24,577	2.3%27,198	2.2%26,136	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,559▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,062▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,621

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Ward 22

Category	Ward 22
South Lawndale	6.5%608
Garfield Ridge	2.3%214
Austin	1.9%177
West Lawn	1.8%168
Chicago Lawn	1.5%144
All other city neighborhoods	36.8%3,430
Outside the city	49.1%4,582
↳ Cicero town, IL	3.6%334
↳ Berwyn city, IL	1.6%152
↳ Joliet city, IL	1.2%108
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL	1.0%95
↳ Orland Park village, IL	0.9%86
↳ All other Illinois locations	37.6%3,505
Out of state	3.2%302
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in ward 22; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference
South Lawndale	6.5%608	0.7%10,541	▲ +5.8%
Garfield Ridge	2.3%214	0.7%9,999	▲ +1.6%
Austin	1.9%177	1.4%20,631	▲ +0.5%
West Lawn	1.8%168	0.5%7,352	▲ +1.3%
Chicago Lawn	1.5%144	0.7%10,607	▲ +0.8%
All other city neighborhoods	36.8%3,430	37.1%542,952	▼ -0.3%
Outside the city	49.1%4,582	47.2%691,556	▲ +1.9%
↳ Cicero town, IL	3.6%334	0.8%10,993	▲ +2.8%
↳ Berwyn city, IL	1.6%152	0.6%9,497	▲ +1.0%
↳ Joliet city, IL	1.2%108	0.6%9,068	▲ +0.5%
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL	1.0%95	0.7%9,767	▲ +0.4%
↳ Orland Park village, IL	0.9%86	0.4%6,467	▲ +0.5%
↳ All other Illinois locations	37.6%3,505	37.0%540,957	▲ +0.6%
Out of state	3.2%302	4.9%72,124	▼ -1.7%
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in ward 22; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
South Lawndale	5.7%446	6.6%516	6.5%608	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +162▼ −0.1 pp▲ +92▲ +0.9 pp▲ +70
Chicago citywide	0.8%10,223	0.8%10,681	0.7%10,541	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +318– 0.0 pp▼ −140– 0.0 pp▲ +458
Garfield Ridge	2.0%160	2.7%208	2.3%214	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +54▼ −0.4 pp▲ +6▲ +0.6 pp▲ +48
Chicago citywide	0.7%9,227	0.7%9,417	0.7%9,999	– 0.0 pp▲ +772– 0.0 pp▲ +582– 0.0 pp▲ +190
Austin	1.4%113	1.7%133	1.9%177	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +64▲ +0.2 pp▲ +44▲ +0.3 pp▲ +20
Chicago citywide	1.5%19,532	1.4%20,284	1.4%20,631	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,099– 0.0 pp▲ +347▼ −0.1 pp▲ +752
West Lawn	1.5%114	1.6%128	1.8%168	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +54▲ +0.2 pp▲ +40▲ +0.2 pp▲ +14
Chicago citywide	0.5%6,893	0.5%7,619	0.5%7,352	– 0.0 pp▲ +459– 0.0 pp▼ −267– 0.0 pp▲ +726
Chicago Lawn	1.5%115	1.3%104	1.5%144	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +29▲ +0.2 pp▲ +40▼ −0.1 pp▼ −11
Chicago citywide	0.7%9,855	0.8%10,666	0.7%10,607	– 0.0 pp▲ +752– 0.0 pp▼ −59– 0.0 pp▲ +811
All other city neighborhoods	34.2%2,682	35.5%2,778	36.8%3,430	▲ +2.5 pp▲ +748▲ +1.3 pp▲ +652▲ +1.3 pp▲ +96
Chicago citywide	38.3%503,539	38.2%541,560	37.1%542,952	▼ −1.2 pp▲ +39,413▼ −1.1 pp▲ +1,392▼ −0.1 pp▲ +38,021
Outside the city	53.6%4,199	50.4%3,937	49.1%4,582	▼ −4.5 pp▲ +383▼ −1.2 pp▲ +645▼ −3.3 pp▼ −262
Chicago citywide	45.9%603,753	45.4%642,891	47.2%691,556	▲ +1.3 pp▲ +87,803▲ +1.9 pp▲ +48,665▼ −0.6 pp▲ +39,138
Cicero town, IL	3.6%282	3.5%276	3.6%334	– 0.0 pp▲ +52▲ +0.1 pp▲ +58▼ −0.1 pp▼ −6
Chicago citywide	0.8%9,934	0.8%11,086	0.8%10,993	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,059– 0.0 pp▼ −93– 0.0 pp▲ +1,152
Berwyn city, IL	2.1%168	2.2%172	1.6%152	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −16▼ −0.6 pp▼ −20▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4
Chicago citywide	0.7%8,732	0.7%9,219	0.6%9,497	– 0.0 pp▲ +765– 0.0 pp▲ +278– 0.0 pp▲ +487
Joliet city, IL	1.2%92	1.1%84	1.2%108	– 0.0 pp▲ +16▲ +0.1 pp▲ +24▼ −0.1 pp▼ −8
Chicago citywide	0.6%7,328	0.6%8,297	0.6%9,068	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,740– 0.0 pp▲ +771– 0.0 pp▲ +969
Oak Lawn village, IL	1.1%89	1.3%103	1.0%95	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +6▼ −0.3 pp▼ −8▲ +0.2 pp▲ +14
Chicago citywide	0.7%9,277	0.7%9,503	0.7%9,767	– 0.0 pp▲ +490– 0.0 pp▲ +264– 0.0 pp▲ +226
Orland Park village, IL	0.8%64	0.9%70	0.9%86	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +22– 0.0 pp▲ +16▲ +0.1 pp▲ +6
Chicago citywide	0.4%5,430	0.4%6,262	0.4%6,467	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,037– 0.0 pp▲ +205– 0.0 pp▲ +832
All other Illinois locations	41.4%3,239	37.4%2,927	37.6%3,505	▼ −3.8 pp▲ +266▲ +0.2 pp▲ +578▼ −3.9 pp▼ −312
Chicago citywide	35.6%467,892	35.1%497,967	37.0%540,957	▲ +1.4 pp▲ +73,065▲ +1.8 pp▲ +42,990▼ −0.5 pp▲ +30,075
Out of state	3.3%256	3.6%281	3.2%302	– 0.0 pp▲ +46▼ −0.4 pp▲ +21▲ +0.3 pp▲ +25
Chicago citywide	4.9%63,789	4.8%68,287	4.9%72,124	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8,335▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,837– 0.0 pp▲ +4,498

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category	Ward 22
No Computer or Smartphone	9.0% ±2.9 pp1,397 ±448
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	19.6% ±3.9 pp3,039 ±602
Desktop or Laptop Available	66.4% ±3.6 pp10,309 ±565
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
No Computer or Smartphone	9.0%±2.9 pp1,397±448	5.1%±0.2 pp58,709±2,246	▲ +3.9%	8/50
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	19.6%±3.9 pp3,039±602	10.4%±0.3 pp120,218±3,642	▲ +9.2%	6/50
Desktop or Laptop Available	66.4%±3.6 pp10,309±565	79.7%±0.4 pp924,956±4,919	▼ -13.4%	43/50
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category	Ward 22
Has Internet Access	88.3% ±3.5 pp13,713 ±542
Cellular Data Plan Only	20.8% ±4.0 pp3,231 ±621
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	3.1% ±1.4 pp480 ±213
No Internet Access	11.7% ±2.3 pp1,820 ±364
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Has Internet Access	88.3%±3.5 pp13,713±542	93.1%±0.3 pp1,080,419±3,310	▼ -4.8%	42/50
Cellular Data Plan Only	20.8%±4.0 pp3,231±621	12.5%±0.3 pp145,219±3,463	▲ +8.3%	2/50
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	3.1%±1.4 pp480±213	3.9%±0.2 pp45,350±1,940	▼ -0.8%	29/50
No Internet Access	11.7%±2.3 pp1,820±364	6.9%±0.2 pp79,786±2,730	▲ +4.8%	9/50
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category	Ward 22
Uninsured Residents	15.7% ±1.9 pp7,614 ±912
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	4.3% ±1.8 pp2,068 ±886
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	24.6% ±3.1 pp11,932 ±1,511
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	0.9% ±0.9 pp454 ±432
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Uninsured Residents	15.7%±1.9 pp7,614±912	9.8%±0.2 pp264,391±5,512	▲ +5.9%	7/50
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	4.3%±1.8 pp2,068±886	3.9%±0.3 pp104,687±8,689	▲ +0.4%	21/50
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	24.6%±3.1 pp11,932±1,511	13.3%±0.3 pp361,430±8,202	▲ +11.2%	5/50
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	0.9%±0.9 pp454±432	1.7%±0.3 pp46,718±7,559	▼ -0.8%	35/50
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category	Ward 22
Insured (Any Coverage)	84.3% ±1.9 pp40,559 ±903
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	37.0% ±2.1 pp17,815 ±1,009
Direct-Purchase Insurance	5.8% ±1.4 pp2,804 ±649
Medicare	14.1% ±1.6 pp6,779 ±752
Medicaid	30.0% ±3.0 pp14,416 ±1,450
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.1% ±0.3 pp50 ±153
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	4.8% ±1.0 pp2,323 ±482
Uninsured	15.7% ±1.9 pp7,543 ±903
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Insured (Any Coverage)	84.3%±1.9 pp40,559±903	90.2%±0.2 pp2,424,871±5,689	▼ -5.9%	44/50
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	37.0%±2.1 pp17,815±1,009	51.2%±0.4 pp1,376,912±9,468	▼ -14.2%	39/50
Direct-Purchase Insurance	5.8%±1.4 pp2,804±649	8.5%±0.2 pp227,424±5,112	▼ -2.6%	42/50
Medicare	14.1%±1.6 pp6,779±752	12.6%±0.2 pp339,804±4,911	▲ +1.4%	15/50
Medicaid	30.0%±3.0 pp14,416±1,450	22.2%±0.3 pp596,931±7,773	▲ +7.8%	14/50
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.1%±0.3 pp50±153	0.3%±0.0 pp7,201±787	▼ -0.2%	42/50
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	4.8%±1.0 pp2,323±482	3.8%±0.1 pp102,777±3,544	▲ +1.0%	14/50
Uninsured	15.7%±1.9 pp7,543±903	9.8%±0.2 pp262,018±5,689	▲ +5.9%	7/50
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category	Ward 22
Adults With at Least One Disability	18.0% ±2.1 pp6,645 ±769
Mobility Disability	10.6% ±1.7 pp3,915 ±643
Hearing Disability	3.3% ±0.8 pp1,230 ±311
Vision Disability	4.4% ±1.3 pp1,623 ±473
Cognitive Disability	6.5% ±1.6 pp2,395 ±576
Self-Care Disability	3.5% ±1.3 pp1,290 ±477
Independent Living Disability	8.4% ±1.7 pp3,095 ±614
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability	18.0%±2.1 pp6,645±769	14.0%±0.2 pp303,665±4,797	▲ +4.0%	13/50
Mobility Disability	10.6%±1.7 pp3,915±643	7.6%±0.2 pp163,666±3,398	▲ +3.0%	14/50
Hearing Disability	3.3%±0.8 pp1,230±311	2.8%±0.1 pp61,430±2,337	▲ +0.5%	20/50
Vision Disability	4.4%±1.3 pp1,623±473	3.0%±0.1 pp64,544±2,269	▲ +1.4%	11/50
Cognitive Disability	6.5%±1.6 pp2,395±576	5.2%±0.1 pp112,824±2,939	▲ +1.3%	16/50
Self-Care Disability	3.5%±1.3 pp1,290±477	2.7%±0.1 pp57,758±2,261	▲ +0.8%	14/50
Independent Living Disability	8.4%±1.7 pp3,095±614	5.7%±0.2 pp123,651±3,247	▲ +2.7%	9/50
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category	Ward 22
Arthritis	18.6%6,972
High Blood Pressure	29.7%11,097
Cancer	3.9%1,443
Current Asthma	9.2%3,424
Coronary Heart Disease	5.7%2,121
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	5.7%2,121
Diabetes	15.4%5,766
High Cholesterol	33.8%12,628
Obesity	37.2%13,896
Stroke	3.4%1,282
Lost All Natural Teeth	3.9%1,458
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Arthritis	18.6%6,972	19.6%409,178	▼ -1.0%	32/50
High Blood Pressure	29.7%11,097	29.7%620,030	0%	21/50
Cancer	3.9%1,443	5.0%104,382	▼ -1.1%	43/50
Current Asthma	9.2%3,424	10.2%212,940	▼ -1.0%	34/50
Coronary Heart Disease	5.7%2,121	4.8%100,207	▲ +0.9%	16/50
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	5.7%2,121	5.5%114,820	▲ +0.2%	20/50
Diabetes	15.4%5,766	12.0%250,517	▲ +3.4%	16/50
High Cholesterol	33.8%12,628	31.6%659,696	▲ +2.2%	18/50
Obesity	37.2%13,896	32.6%680,572	▲ +4.6%	16/50
Stroke	3.4%1,282	3.3%68,892	▲ +0.1%	19/50
Lost All Natural Teeth	3.9%1,458	2.5%52,249	▲ +1.4%	13/50
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category	Ward 22
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	17.9%6,694
Current Cigarette Smoking	14.1%5,273
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	36.8%13,746
Short Sleep Duration	39.4%14,738
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	17.9%6,694	19.0%396,652	▼ -1.1%	29/50
Current Cigarette Smoking	14.1%5,273	11.9%248,430	▲ +2.2%	15/50
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	36.8%13,746	24.7%515,648	▲ +12.1%	3/50
Short Sleep Duration	39.4%14,738	37.8%789,129	▲ +1.6%	19/50
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category	Ward 22
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	32.1%11,988
Frequent Physical Distress	15.8%5,905
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	32.1%11,988	21.1%440,493	▲ +11.0%	5/50
Frequent Physical Distress	15.8%5,905	11.8%246,342	▲ +4.0%	7/50
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category	Ward 22
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	69.8%26,079
Routine Checkup in Past Year	72.4%27,067
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	82.1%30,702
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	43.9%16,405
Dental Visit in Past Year	45.5%17,027
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	68.1%25,457
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	69.8%26,079	72.5%1,513,542	▼ -2.7%	31/50
Routine Checkup in Past Year	72.4%27,067	76.2%1,590,785	▼ -3.8%	44/50
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	82.1%30,702	86.2%1,799,549	▼ -4.1%	48/50
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	43.9%16,405	55.8%1,164,905	▼ -11.9%	50/50
Dental Visit in Past Year	45.5%17,027	58.4%1,219,184	▼ -12.9%	44/50
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	68.1%25,457	74.2%1,549,032	▼ -6.1%	50/50
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category	Ward 22
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	17.8%6,648
Frequent Mental Distress	16.8%6,292
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	32.0%11,977
Loneliness	37.9%14,180
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 22	City	Difference	Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	17.8%6,648	19.1%398,740	▼ -1.3%	43/50
Frequent Mental Distress	16.8%6,292	16.0%334,023	▲ +0.8%	15/50
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	32.0%11,977	28.2%588,716	▲ +3.8%	15/50
Loneliness	37.9%14,180	35.8%747,377	▲ +2.1%	15/50
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Compare All Wards

Chicago City Council Ward 22

Ward 22 at a Glance

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Age Distribution

Educational Attainment

Population

Household Size

Marital Status

Language Spoken at Home

English Proficiency

Household Composition

Children by Household Type

Veteran Status

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Poverty Status

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Occupation

Industry of Employment

Class of Worker

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Earnings of All Workers

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 22

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 22 in Lower-Income Families

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Ward 22

Local Businesses

Jobs in Ward 22

Industry of Jobs in Ward 22

Earnings of Jobs in Ward 22

Jobs in Ward 22 by Firm Age

Jobs in Ward 22 by Firm Size

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

College Enrollment

Student Digital Access

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Year Moved Into Current Home

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Housing Vacancy Status

Housing Age

Housing Units by Building Size

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Overcrowded Housing

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Monthly Housing Costs

Rent

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Home Values

Federal Housing Assistance

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Commute Time

Household Vehicle Access

Where Ward 22 Residents Work

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Ward 22

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Household Internet Access

Health

Health Insurance

Health Insurance Coverage Types