Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category	Ward 13
Hispanic	68.9% ±4.2 pp36,241 ±2,210
White	28.1% ±2.0 pp14,779 ±1,035
Black	0.5% ±0.3 pp283 ±174
Asian	1.1% ±0.6 pp582 ±310
Other or Multi-racial	1.4% ±1.0 pp726 ±517
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Hispanic	68.9%±4.2 pp36,241±2,210	29.7%±0.2 pp805,318±5,785	▲ +39.2%	7/50
White	28.1%±2.0 pp14,779±1,035	32.1%±0.2 pp870,127±5,557	▼ -4.0%	24/50
Black	0.5%±0.3 pp283±174	27.4%±0.2 pp743,710±6,047	▼ -26.9%	50/50
Asian	1.1%±0.6 pp582±310	7.2%±0.2 pp196,435±4,370	▼ -6.1%	38/50
Other or Multi-racial	1.4%±1.0 pp726±517	3.5%±0.1 pp95,636±3,778	▼ -2.1%	44/50
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Hispanic	56.5% ±2.5 pp31,011 ±1,390	61.7% ±3.3 pp34,603 ±1,847	68.9% ±4.2 pp36,241 ±2,210	▲ +12.3 pp▲ +5,230▲ +7.2 pp▲ +1,638▲ +5.1 pp▲ +3,592
Chicago citywide	28.9% ±0.2 pp785,292 ±4,750	28.8% ±0.2 pp780,167 ±5,832	29.7% ±0.2 pp805,318 ±5,785	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +20,026▲ +0.9 pp▲ +25,151▼ −0.2 pp▼ −5,125
White	41.3% ±1.6 pp22,668 ±901	35.3% ±1.0 pp19,787 ±545	28.1% ±2.0 pp14,779 ±1,035	▼ −13.2 pp▼ −7,889▼ −7.2 pp▼ −5,008▼ −6.1 pp▼ −2,881
Chicago citywide	32.2% ±0.2 pp872,513 ±4,319	33.3% ±0.2 pp901,769 ±4,468	32.1% ±0.2 pp870,127 ±5,557	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2,386▼ −1.2 pp▼ −31,642▲ +1.1 pp▲ +29,256
Black	0.6% ±0.3 pp339 ±185	1.7% ±0.8 pp969 ±428	0.5% ±0.3 pp283 ±174	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −56▼ −1.2 pp▼ −686▲ +1.1 pp▲ +630
Chicago citywide	31.5% ±0.1 pp853,214 ±3,755	29.2% ±0.2 pp790,893 ±4,690	27.4% ±0.2 pp743,710 ±6,047	▼ −4.0 pp▼ −109,504▼ −1.8 pp▼ −47,183▼ −2.3 pp▼ −62,321
Asian	1.0% ±0.6 pp526 ±306	0.5% ±0.3 pp262 ±147	1.1% ±0.6 pp582 ±310	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +56▲ +0.6 pp▲ +320▼ −0.5 pp▼ −264
Chicago citywide	5.7% ±0.1 pp154,287 ±2,942	6.5% ±0.1 pp177,195 ±3,532	7.2% ±0.2 pp196,435 ±4,370	▲ +1.6 pp▲ +42,148▲ +0.7 pp▲ +19,240▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,908
Other or Multi-racial	0.6% ±0.3 pp309 ±169	0.9% ±0.4 pp492 ±248	1.4% ±1.0 pp726 ±517	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +417▲ +0.5 pp▲ +234▲ +0.3 pp▲ +183
Chicago citywide	1.7% ±0.1 pp47,302 ±1,990	2.2% ±0.1 pp59,510 ±2,584	3.5% ±0.1 pp95,636 ±3,778	▲ +1.8 pp▲ +48,334▲ +1.3 pp▲ +36,126▲ +0.5 pp▲ +12,208

Age Distribution

Category	Ward 13
Under 5	5.8% ±1.1 pp3,050 ±569
5-17	17.7% ±1.7 pp9,297 ±916
18-24	8.6% ±1.2 pp4,507 ±639
25-44	27.5% ±1.5 pp14,461 ±769
45-64	25.5% ±1.5 pp13,432 ±780
65-74	8.7% ±1.0 pp4,553 ±542
75-84	4.3% ±0.9 pp2,266 ±470
85+	2.0% ±0.5 pp1,046 ±246
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Under 5	5.8%±1.1 pp3,050±569	5.3%±0.1 pp144,044±3,726	▲ +0.5%	18/50
5-17	17.7%±1.7 pp9,297±916	14.1%±0.2 pp381,582±5,292	▲ +3.6%	13/50
18-24	8.6%±1.2 pp4,507±639	9.6%±0.2 pp260,942±4,703	▼ -1.1%	30/50
25-44	27.5%±1.5 pp14,461±769	34.3%±0.2 pp929,946±6,124	▼ -6.8%	34/50
45-64	25.5%±1.5 pp13,432±780	22.9%±0.2 pp620,047±5,184	▲ +2.7%	14/50
65-74	8.7%±1.0 pp4,553±542	8.2%±0.1 pp221,932±3,538	▲ +0.5%	22/50
75-84	4.3%±0.9 pp2,266±470	4.0%±0.1 pp107,625±2,624	▲ +0.3%	19/50
85+	2.0%±0.5 pp1,046±246	1.7%±0.1 pp45,108±1,900	▲ +0.3%	18/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category	Ward 13
No High School Diploma	18.0% ±2.2 pp6,427 ±788
High School Diploma or GED	31.6% ±2.9 pp11,309 ±1,048
Some College or Associate's Degree	25.9% ±2.3 pp9,271 ±821
Bachelor's Degree	15.8% ±2.2 pp5,640 ±777
Graduate Degree	8.7% ±1.4 pp3,112 ±514
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
No High School Diploma	18.0%±2.2 pp6,427±788	12.8%±0.2 pp246,015±4,665	▲ +5.2%	15/50
High School Diploma or GED	31.6%±2.9 pp11,309±1,048	21.1%±0.3 pp405,248±5,594	▲ +10.6%	10/50
Some College or Associate's Degree	25.9%±2.3 pp9,271±821	21.8%±0.3 pp419,911±5,261	▲ +4.1%	17/50
Bachelor's Degree	15.8%±2.2 pp5,640±777	25.4%±0.3 pp488,467±5,561	▼ -9.6%	33/50
Graduate Degree	8.7%±1.4 pp3,112±514	19.0%±0.3 pp365,017±4,874	▼ -10.3%	36/50
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category	Ward 13
Total Population	52,611 ±3,156
Total Households	19,261 ±922
Population Density	9,917 ±595 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	Average Ward	Difference
Total Population	52,611	54,206	▼ −1,595
Total Households	19,261	23,200	▼ −3,939
Population Density	9,917 people/sq mi	16,281 people/sq mi	▼ −6,364
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average ward rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large wards. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19	Difference	Rank
Total Population	54,853 ±1,768	56,113 ±2,230	52,611 ±3,156	▼ −2,242 ±3,618▼ −3,502 ±3,865▲ +1,260 ±2,846	▲ +623▲ +1,947▼ −1,595	23/5020/5033/50
Average Ward	54,230	54,166	54,206	▼ −24▲ +40▼ −64
Total Households	17,897 ±361	18,314 ±417	19,261 ±922	▲ +1,364 ±990▲ +947 ±1,012▲ +417 ±552	▼ −2,671▼ −3,006▼ −3,939	37/5038/5036/50
Average Ward	20,568	21,320	23,200	▲ +2,631▲ +1,880▲ +751
Population Density (per sq mi)	10,340 ±333	10,577 ±420	9,917 ±595	▼ −423▼ −660▲ +238	▼ −5,576▼ −5,535▼ −6,364	37/5036/5038/50
Average Ward Density	15,916	16,112	16,281	▲ +366▲ +169▲ +196

Household Size

Category	Ward 13
Average Household Size	2.73±0.17
1-Person Households	29.4% ±3.0 pp5,654 ±573
2-Person Households	25.9% ±3.0 pp4,990 ±572
3-Person Households	13.6% ±2.2 pp2,625 ±417
4+ Person Households	31.1% ±3.4 pp5,992 ±655
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Size	2.73±0.17	2.29±0.02	▲ +0.44	12/50
1-Person Households	29.4%±3.0 pp5,654±573	39.7%±0.4 pp460,268±4,301	▼ -10.3%	35/50
2-Person Households	25.9%±3.0 pp4,990±572	29.5%±0.4 pp342,235±4,195	▼ -3.6%	36/50
3-Person Households	13.6%±2.2 pp2,625±417	12.9%±0.3 pp149,291±3,231	▲ +0.8%	31/50
4+ Person Households	31.1%±3.4 pp5,992±655	18.0%±0.3 pp208,411±4,023	▲ +13.1%	9/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category	Ward 13
Never Married	38.3% ±2.1 pp16,266 ±885
Married	44.5% ±1.0 pp18,927 ±435
Separated	1.9% ±0.6 pp818 ±246
Divorced	7.8% ±1.3 pp3,295 ±534
Widowed	7.5% ±1.2 pp3,192 ±523
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Never Married	38.3%±2.1 pp16,266±885	49.6%±0.3 pp1,130,286±6,623	▼ -11.4%	44/50
Married	44.5%±1.0 pp18,927±435	35.5%±0.3 pp807,294±6,077	▲ +9.1%	10/50
Separated	1.9%±0.6 pp818±246	2.2%±0.1 pp49,430±2,379	▼ -0.2%	32/50
Divorced	7.8%±1.3 pp3,295±534	7.9%±0.2 pp180,700±3,966	▼ -0.2%	25/50
Widowed	7.5%±1.2 pp3,192±523	4.8%±0.1 pp109,357±2,738	▲ +2.7%	8/50
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category	Ward 13
Speak English Only	37.0% ±2.2 pp18,285 ±1,083
Spanish	54.5% ±4.6 pp26,973 ±2,277
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic	6.4% ±1.8 pp3,166 ±892
Other Languages	2.1% ±0.9 pp1,044 ±421
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this ward, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Speak English Only	37.0%±2.2 pp18,285±1,083	64.6%±0.3 pp1,659,069±8,218	▼ -27.7%	43/50
Spanish	54.5%±4.6 pp26,973±2,277	23.7%±0.2 pp607,865±6,166	▲ +30.8%	8/50
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic	6.4%±1.8 pp3,166±892	2.6%±0.1 pp67,932±3,529	▲ +3.8%	5/30
Other Languages	2.1%±0.9 pp1,044±421	1.0%±0.1 pp25,292±2,452	▲ +1.1%	36/50
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this ward, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 13
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	76.1% ±6.4 pp76.1%±6.4 pp37,707 ±3,176
Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents age 5+)	23.9% ±2.8 pp23.9%±2.8 pp11,854 ±1,364
↳ Speaks English Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	14.2% ±2.3 pp59.5%±7.1 pp7,049 ±1,165
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	7.4% ±1.2 pp30.9%±3.3 pp3,657 ±572
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	2.3% ±1.4 pp9.7%±5.6 pp1,147 ±674
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	76.1%±6.4 pp76.1%±6.4 pp37,707±3,176	85.4%±0.5 pp85.4%±0.5 pp2,192,778±11,961	▼ -9.3%▼ -9.3%	41/50
Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents age 5+)	23.9%±2.8 pp23.9%±2.8 pp11,854±1,364	14.6%±0.3 pp14.6%±0.3 pp374,404±6,794	▲ +9.3%▲ +9.3%	10/50
↳ Speaks English Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	14.2%±2.3 pp59.5%±7.1 pp7,049±1,165	7.1%±0.2 pp48.9%±0.9 pp183,252±4,686	▲ +7.1%▲ +10.5%	6/5014/50
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	7.4%±1.2 pp30.9%±3.3 pp3,657±572	5.2%±0.2 pp35.6%±0.8 pp133,269±3,923	▲ +2.2%▼ -4.7%	14/5034/50
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	2.3%±1.4 pp9.7%±5.6 pp1,147±674	2.3%±0.1 pp15.5%±0.7 pp57,883±2,982	▲ +0.1%▼ -5.8%	17/5035/50
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category	Ward 13
Married-Couple Households	43.9% ±3.6 pp8,456 ±689
Unmarried-Couple Households	6.3% ±1.7 pp1,217 ±331
One-Person Households	29.4% ±3.4 pp5,654 ±658
Other Household Types	20.4% ±7.5 pp3,935 ±1,440
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Married-Couple Households	43.9%±3.6 pp8,456±689	30.9%±0.3 pp358,432±3,598	▲ +13.0%	11/50
Unmarried-Couple Households	6.3%±1.7 pp1,217±331	8.3%±0.2 pp96,220±2,797	▼ -2.0%	33/50
One-Person Households	29.4%±3.4 pp5,654±658	39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,729	▼ -10.3%	35/50
Other Household Types	20.4%±7.5 pp3,935±1,440	21.1%±0.7 pp245,285±8,514	▼ -0.7%	27/50
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category	Ward 13
Children in Married-Couple Households	63.0% ±7.3 pp7,702 ±889
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	9.3% ±4.0 pp1,133 ±489
Children in Single-Mother Households	20.7% ±5.6 pp2,534 ±681
Children in Single-Father Households	7.1% ±2.9 pp864 ±353
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households	63.0%±7.3 pp7,702±889	56.0%±0.8 pp293,542±4,257	▲ +7.0%	25/50
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	9.3%±4.0 pp1,133±489	8.8%±0.6 pp45,960±3,208	▲ +0.5%	20/50
Children in Single-Mother Households	20.7%±5.6 pp2,534±681	30.6%±0.9 pp160,535±4,521	▼ -9.9%	29/50
Children in Single-Father Households	7.1%±2.9 pp864±353	4.6%±0.4 pp24,133±2,006	▲ +2.5%	6/50
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 13
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	3.9% ±0.9 pp3.9%±0.9 pp1,581 ±347
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	23.4% ±10.1 pp0.9%±0.4 pp370 ±159
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	19.5% ±12.6 pp0.8%±0.5 pp308 ±199
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	33.0% ±10.3 pp1.3%±0.4 pp521 ±163
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	4.5% ±5.9 pp0.2%±0.2 pp71 ±94
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	19.7% ±10.8 pp0.8%±0.4 pp311 ±171
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	3.9%±0.9 pp3.9%±0.9 pp1,581±347	2.8%±0.1 pp2.8%±0.1 pp60,766±2,397	▲ +1.1%▲ +1.1%	9/50
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	23.4%±10.1 pp0.9%±0.4 pp370±159	26.8%±1.8 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,267±1,067	▼ -3.4%▲ +0.2%	33/5011/50
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	19.5%±12.6 pp0.8%±0.5 pp308±199	12.9%±1.0 pp0.4%±0.0 pp7,830±579	▲ +6.6%▲ +0.4%	8/508/50
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	33.0%±10.3 pp1.3%±0.4 pp521±163	28.8%±1.4 pp0.8%±0.0 pp17,525±846	▲ +4.1%▲ +0.5%	14/507/50
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	4.5%±5.9 pp0.2%±0.2 pp71±94	4.9%±0.7 pp0.1%±0.0 pp2,995±441	▼ -0.4%0%	26/5015/50
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	19.7%±10.8 pp0.8%±0.4 pp311±171	26.6%±1.5 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,149±916	▼ -6.9%0%	38/5018/50
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 13
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	73.1% ±1.9 pp73.1%±1.9 pp38,454 ±1,020
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	26.9% ±2.4 pp26.9%±2.4 pp14,157 ±1,284
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	15.3% ±1.5 pp57.0%±2.4 pp8,073 ±808
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	11.6% ±2.2 pp43.0%±7.1 pp6,084 ±1,146
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	73.1%±1.9 pp73.1%±1.9 pp38,454±1,020	79.1%±0.3 pp79.1%±0.3 pp2,144,343±7,926	▼ -6.0%▼ -6.0%	36/50
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	26.9%±2.4 pp26.9%±2.4 pp14,157±1,284	20.9%±0.3 pp20.9%±0.3 pp566,883±7,968	▲ +6.0%▲ +6.0%	15/50
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	15.3%±1.5 pp57.0%±2.4 pp8,073±808	10.0%±0.2 pp47.7%±0.5 pp270,551±4,603	▲ +5.4%▲ +9.3%	12/509/50
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	11.6%±2.2 pp43.0%±7.1 pp6,084±1,146	10.9%±0.2 pp52.3%±0.9 pp296,332±6,504	▲ +0.6%▼ -9.3%	22/5042/50
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show

Category	Ward 13
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents)	20.3%±2.5 pp75.6%±4.6 pp10,681±1,317
Born in Poland (of foreign-born residents)	3.5%±0.9 pp13.0%±2.9 pp1,841±453
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	2.8%10.5%1,486
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	Chicago	Difference	Rank
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents)	20.3% ±2.5 pp75.6%±4.6 pp10,681	8.2% ±0.2 pp39.3%222,978	▲ +12.1%▲ +36.2%	7/508/50
Born in Poland (of foreign-born residents)	3.5% ±0.9 pp13.0%±2.9 pp1,841	1.0% ±0.1 pp4.6%26,188	▲ +2.5%▲ +8.4%	5/506/50
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	2.8%10.5%1,486	——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show

Category	Ward 13
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	2.5% ±0.8 pp9.2%±3.0 pp1,300 ±436
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	4.4% ±1.2 pp16.2%±4.2 pp2,288 ±629
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	8.9% ±1.5 pp33.2%±4.5 pp4,699 ±766
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	11.1% ±1.4 pp41.4%±3.6 pp5,847 ±732
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	2.5%±0.8 pp9.2%±3.0 pp1,300±436	5.9%±0.2 pp1128.1%±109.7 pp159,447±5,557	▼ -3.4%▼ -1118.9%	42/5050/50
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	4.4%±1.2 pp16.2%±4.2 pp2,288±629	4.5%±0.1 pp862.5%±83.4 pp121,912±4,035	▼ -0.1%▼ -846.4%	26/5045/50
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	8.9%±1.5 pp33.2%±4.5 pp4,699±766	4.6%±0.1 pp876.2%±84.2 pp123,849±3,901	▲ +4.4%▼ -843.0%	6/501/50
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	11.1%±1.4 pp41.4%±3.6 pp5,847±732	6.0%±0.1 pp1143.9%±106.8 pp161,675±3,491	▲ +5.2%▼ -1102.5%	7/504/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later	0.6% ±0.4 pp344 ±213	1.0% ±0.4 pp556 ±219	2.5% ±0.8 pp1,300 ±435	▲ +1.8 pp▲ +956▲ +1.5 pp▲ +744▲ +0.4 pp▲ +212
Chicago citywide	1.4% ±0.1 pp36,978 ±2,235	3.7% ±0.1 pp99,118 ±3,198	5.9% ±0.2 pp159,447 ±5,568	▲ +4.5 pp▲ +122,469▲ +2.2 pp▲ +60,329▲ +2.3 pp▲ +62,140
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009	4.4% ±1.0 pp2,425 ±559	3.8% ±0.8 pp2,112 ±432	4.4% ±1.2 pp2,288 ±629	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −137▲ +0.6 pp▲ +176▼ −0.7 pp▼ −313
Chicago citywide	5.9% ±0.1 pp161,331 ±3,896	4.9% ±0.1 pp131,658 ±3,182	4.5% ±0.1 pp121,912 ±4,044	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −39,419▼ −0.4 pp▼ −9,746▼ −1.1 pp▼ −29,673
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999	8.1% ±1.2 pp4,432 ±644	7.2% ±1.2 pp4,017 ±655	8.9% ±1.5 pp4,699 ±766	▲ +0.9 pp▲ +267▲ +1.8 pp▲ +682▼ −0.9 pp▼ −415
Chicago citywide	6.1% ±0.1 pp165,077 ±3,717	5.3% ±0.1 pp142,413 ±3,015	4.6% ±0.1 pp123,849 ±3,911	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −41,228▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,564▼ −0.8 pp▼ −22,664
Entered the U.S. Before 1990	10.9% ±1.1 pp5,983 ±600	10.7% ±1.1 pp6,027 ±596	11.1% ±1.4 pp5,847 ±732	▲ +0.2 pp▼ −136▲ +0.4 pp▼ −180▼ −0.2 pp▲ +44
Chicago citywide	7.5% ±0.1 pp204,169 ±3,469	6.9% ±0.1 pp186,050 ±3,114	6.0% ±0.1 pp161,675 ±3,509	▼ −1.6 pp▼ −42,494▼ −0.9 pp▼ −24,375▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,119

Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category	Ward 13
Average Household Income	$101,526±$5,569
Per Capita Income	$37,479±$1,747
10th Percentile Household Income	$19,011±$3,089
25th Percentile Household Income	$41,585±$3,765
Median Household Income	$79,849±$6,618
75th Percentile Household Income	$135,651±$8,023
90th Percentile Household Income	Over $200,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$101,526±$5,569	$116,016±$1,263	▼ −$14,490	26/50
Per Capita Income	$37,479±$1,747	$50,086±$581	▼ −$12,607	29/50
10th Percentile Household Income	$19,011±$3,089	$12,933±$271	▲ +$6,077	18/50
25th Percentile Household Income	$41,585±$3,765	$34,575±$649	▲ +$7,010	19/50
Median Household Income	$79,849±$6,618	$77,902±$907	▲ +$1,947	22/50
75th Percentile Household Income	$135,651±$8,023	$144,150±$1,210	▼ −$8,499	24/50
90th Percentile Household Income	Over $200,000	Over $200,000	—	1/50
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$91,296 ±2,867	$100,064 ±4,245	$101,526 ±5,569	▲ +$10,230▲ +$1,462▲ +$8,768
Chicago citywide	$95,689 ±910	$111,304 ±1,075	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$20,327▲ +$4,712▲ +$15,615
Average Household Income (nominal dollars)	$68,900 ±2,163	$81,552 ±3,460	$101,526 ±5,569	▲ +$32,627▲ +$19,974▲ +$12,653
Chicago citywide	$72,215 ±687	$90,713 ±876	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$43,801▲ +$25,303▲ +$18,498
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$31,167 ±604	$34,064 ±941	$37,479 ±1,747	▲ +$6,312▲ +$3,415▲ +$2,897
Chicago citywide	$37,927 ±351	$45,525 ±412	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$12,160▲ +$4,562▲ +$7,598
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars)	$23,521 ±456	$27,762 ±767	$37,479 ±1,747	▲ +$13,958▲ +$9,717▲ +$4,241
Chicago citywide	$28,623 ±265	$37,103 ±336	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$21,464▲ +$12,984▲ +$8,480
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$21,292 ±1,849	$25,157 ±1,917	$19,011 ±3,089	▼ −$2,281▼ −$6,146▲ +$3,864
Chicago citywide	$11,828 ±190	$13,281 ±277	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$1,105▼ −$348▲ +$1,453
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$16,069 ±1,395	$20,503 ±1,562	$19,011 ±3,089	▲ +$2,942▼ −$1,492▲ +$4,434
Chicago citywide	$8,927 ±144	$10,824 ±225	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$4,007▲ +$2,109▲ +$1,898
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$39,553 ±2,685	$44,192 ±3,009	$41,585 ±3,765	▲ +$2,032▼ −$2,606▲ +$4,639
Chicago citywide	$28,727 ±321	$31,597 ±462	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$5,848▲ +$2,979▲ +$2,869
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$29,850 ±2,026	$36,016 ±2,453	$41,585 ±3,765	▲ +$11,735▲ +$5,569▲ +$6,166
Chicago citywide	$21,680 ±242	$25,751 ±376	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$12,895▲ +$8,824▲ +$4,071
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$78,353 ±4,044	$78,886 ±4,462	$79,849 ±6,618	▲ +$1,496▲ +$963▲ +$533
Chicago citywide	$63,379 ±591	$71,469 ±723	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$14,523▲ +$6,433▲ +$8,090
Median Household Income (nominal dollars)	$59,131 ±3,052	$64,292 ±3,637	$79,849 ±6,618	▲ +$20,718▲ +$15,557▲ +$5,161
Chicago citywide	$47,831 ±446	$58,247 ±589	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$30,071▲ +$19,655▲ +$10,416
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$128,631 ±4,733	$135,490 ±5,589	$135,651 ±8,023	▲ +$7,020▲ +$161▲ +$6,859
Chicago citywide	$122,019 ±806	$139,501 ±1,057	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$22,131▲ +$4,648▲ +$17,482
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$97,075 ±3,572	$110,425 ±4,555	$135,651 ±8,023	▲ +$38,576▲ +$25,226▲ +$13,349
Chicago citywide	$92,086 ±608	$113,694 ±862	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$52,064▲ +$30,456▲ +$21,608
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$180,586 ±7,175	$199,181 ±10,723	—	——▲ +$18,595
Chicago citywide	$202,601 ±2,442	$235,390 ±1,636	—	——▲ +$32,790
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$136,285 ±5,415	$162,332 ±8,739	—	——▲ +$26,047
Chicago citywide	$152,899 ±1,843	$191,844 ±1,333	—	——▲ +$38,944

Poverty Status

Category	Ward 13
Below Poverty Line	8.6% ±1.9 pp4,545 ±1,001
Below 200% Poverty Line	27.9% ±4.5 pp14,663 ±2,360
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	4.1% ±1.4 pp2,174 ±761
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Below Poverty Line	8.6%±1.9 pp4,545±1,001	16.8%±0.4 pp456,194±11,330	▼ -8.2%	42/50
Below 200% Poverty Line	27.9%±4.5 pp14,663±2,360	33.4%±0.6 pp905,794±16,660	▼ -5.5%	36/50
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	4.1%±1.4 pp2,174±761	8.3%±0.3 pp226,117±7,649	▼ -4.2%	46/50
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Category	Ward 13
Food Insecurity	22.8%9,238
Housing Insecurity	19.1%7,746
Transportation Barriers	10.1%4,103
Threatened Utility Shutoff	9.4%3,813
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Food Insecurity	22.8%9,238	24.4%509,385	▼ -1.6%	28/50
Housing Insecurity	19.1%7,746	19.7%411,266	▼ -0.6%	27/50
Transportation Barriers	10.1%4,103	11.6%242,167	▼ -1.5%	29/50
Threatened Utility Shutoff	9.4%3,813	11.9%248,430	▼ -2.5%	29/50
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category	Ward 13
In Labor Force	83.9% ±2.6 pp18,454 ±564
↳ Employed	79.9% ±2.8 pp17,592 ±619
↳ Unemployed	3.8% ±1.2 pp836 ±272
↳ Unemployment Rate	4.5% ±1.5 pp—
Not in Labor Force	16.1% ±8.5 pp3,551 ±1,880
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
In Labor Force	83.9%±2.6 pp18,454±564	85.6%±0.3 pp1,069,076±3,571	▼ -1.7%	28/50
↳ Employed	79.9%±2.8 pp17,592±619	79.6%±0.3 pp994,466±4,015	▲ +0.4%	25/50
↳ Unemployed	3.8%±1.2 pp836±272	5.9%±0.2 pp73,968±2,565	▼ -2.1%	39/50
↳ Unemployment Rate	4.5%±1.5 pp—	6.9%±0.2 pp86,502±3,074	▼ -2.4%	39/50
Not in Labor Force	16.1%±8.5 pp3,551±1,880	14.4%±1.1 pp180,399±13,145	▲ +1.7%	23/50
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category	Ward 13
Management, Business, Science & Arts	34.2% ±3.4 pp8,575 ±864
↳ Management Occupations	6.4% ±1.4 pp1,601 ±358
↳ Business & Financial Operations	5.6% ±1.6 pp1,394 ±410
↳ Computer & Mathematical	3.8% ±1.2 pp951 ±289
↳ Architecture & Engineering	1.6% ±0.7 pp395 ±187
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	0.7% ±0.5 pp186 ±132
↳ Community & Social Service	1.8% ±0.9 pp463 ±222
↳ Legal Occupations	0.7% ±0.4 pp184 ±105
↳ Education, Training & Library	7.2% ±1.6 pp1,798 ±396
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	1.1% ±0.7 pp283 ±163
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	3.5% ±1.6 pp881 ±397
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	1.7% ±0.9 pp438 ±221
Service	18.4% ±3.1 pp4,602 ±787
↳ Healthcare Support	2.2% ±0.9 pp546 ±229
↳ Protective Service	4.8% ±1.2 pp1,212 ±300
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	4.2% ±1.4 pp1,052 ±350
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	5.4% ±2.1 pp1,354 ±518
↳ Personal Care & Service	1.7% ±0.9 pp438 ±219
Sales & Office	19.4% ±2.7 pp4,854 ±666
↳ Sales & Related	6.3% ±1.5 pp1,578 ±386
↳ Office & Administrative Support	13.1% ±2.2 pp3,276 ±545
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	10.4% ±2.1 pp2,601 ±528
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.1% ±0.4 pp36 ±94
↳ Construction & Extraction	6.1% ±1.5 pp1,520 ±369
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	4.2% ±1.6 pp1,045 ±389
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	17.7% ±2.6 pp4,428 ±655
↳ Production Occupations	8.0% ±1.8 pp2,006 ±439
↳ Transportation Occupations	5.3% ±1.4 pp1,316 ±354
↳ Material Moving Occupations	4.4% ±1.2 pp1,106 ±302
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts	34.2%±3.4 pp8,575±864	49.2%±0.4 pp686,743±5,710	▼ -15.0%	33/50
↳ Management Occupations	6.4%±1.4 pp1,601±358	12.3%±0.3 pp172,182±3,807	▼ -5.9%	41/50
↳ Business & Financial Operations	5.6%±1.6 pp1,394±410	9.1%±0.2 pp127,081±3,358	▼ -3.5%	34/50
↳ Computer & Mathematical	3.8%±1.2 pp951±289	4.9%±0.2 pp68,921±2,690	▼ -1.1%	25/50
↳ Architecture & Engineering	1.6%±0.7 pp395±187	1.6%±0.1 pp22,779±1,380	▼ -0.1%	26/50
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	0.7%±0.5 pp186±132	1.4%±0.1 pp19,126±1,340	▼ -0.6%	31/50
↳ Community & Social Service	1.8%±0.9 pp463±222	1.9%±0.1 pp26,973±1,500	▼ -0.1%	27/50
↳ Legal Occupations	0.7%±0.4 pp184±105	2.3%±0.1 pp31,629±1,814	▼ -1.5%	37/50
↳ Education, Training & Library	7.2%±1.6 pp1,798±396	6.6%±0.2 pp92,316±2,697	▲ +0.6%	18/50
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	1.1%±0.7 pp283±163	3.1%±0.1 pp43,879±1,786	▼ -2.0%	42/50
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	3.5%±1.6 pp881±397	4.6%±0.2 pp63,551±2,652	▼ -1.0%	26/50
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	1.7%±0.9 pp438±221	1.3%±0.1 pp18,306±1,387	▲ +0.4%	9/50
Service	18.4%±3.1 pp4,602±787	16.9%±0.3 pp235,977±4,217	▲ +1.5%	29/50
↳ Healthcare Support	2.2%±0.9 pp546±229	3.4%±0.2 pp46,792±2,107	▼ -1.2%	39/50
↳ Protective Service	4.8%±1.2 pp1,212±300	2.8%±0.1 pp39,146±1,734	▲ +2.0%	12/50
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	4.2%±1.4 pp1,052±350	5.1%±0.2 pp70,514±2,393	▼ -0.9%	34/50
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	5.4%±2.1 pp1,354±518	3.0%±0.1 pp41,783±1,967	▲ +2.4%	5/50
↳ Personal Care & Service	1.7%±0.9 pp438±219	2.7%±0.1 pp37,742±1,657	▼ -1.0%	45/50
Sales & Office	19.4%±2.7 pp4,854±666	17.4%±0.3 pp243,580±4,754	▲ +1.9%	13/50
↳ Sales & Related	6.3%±1.5 pp1,578±386	8.1%±0.2 pp113,073±3,174	▼ -1.8%	46/50
↳ Office & Administrative Support	13.1%±2.2 pp3,276±545	9.3%±0.3 pp130,507±3,591	▲ +3.7%	7/50
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	10.4%±2.1 pp2,601±528	4.6%±0.2 pp64,338±2,929	▲ +5.8%	7/50
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.1%±0.4 pp36±94	0.1%±0.0 pp1,506±406	0%	13/50
↳ Construction & Extraction	6.1%±1.5 pp1,520±369	2.8%±0.1 pp39,432±2,062	▲ +3.2%	7/50
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	4.2%±1.6 pp1,045±389	1.7%±0.1 pp23,400±1,722	▲ +2.5%	4/50
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	17.7%±2.6 pp4,428±655	11.8%±0.3 pp165,261±3,629	▲ +5.8%	16/50
↳ Production Occupations	8.0%±1.8 pp2,006±439	4.2%±0.2 pp57,989±2,275	▲ +3.9%	8/50
↳ Transportation Occupations	5.3%±1.4 pp1,316±354	3.9%±0.2 pp54,099±2,118	▲ +1.4%	18/50
↳ Material Moving Occupations	4.4%±1.2 pp1,106±302	3.8%±0.2 pp53,173±2,312	▲ +0.6%	24/50
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category	Ward 13
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.1% ±0.3 pp21 ±86
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	0.0% ±0.3 pp0
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.1% ±0.3 pp21 ±86
Construction	7.2% ±1.6 pp1,799 ±392
Manufacturing	10.6% ±1.8 pp2,648 ±453
Wholesale Trade	2.2% ±0.8 pp543 ±199
Retail Trade	10.0% ±1.8 pp2,499 ±459
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	8.7% ±1.7 pp2,171 ±432
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	8.1% ±1.7 pp2,024 ±427
↳ Utilities	0.6% ±0.5 pp147 ±116
Information	0.9% ±0.6 pp231 ±138
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	6.3% ±1.5 pp1,575 ±365
↳ Finance & Insurance	4.9% ±1.4 pp1,236 ±347
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.4% ±0.6 pp339 ±152
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	11.2% ±2.1 pp2,813 ±516
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	5.8% ±1.3 pp1,443 ±315
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.1% ±0.3 pp29 ±87
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	5.4% ±1.8 pp1,341 ±446
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	22.5% ±2.8 pp5,650 ±711
↳ Educational Services	11.9% ±2.2 pp2,977 ±540
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	10.7% ±2.0 pp2,673 ±514
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	7.8% ±1.9 pp1,946 ±468
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	1.3% ±0.6 pp326 ±157
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	6.5% ±1.8 pp1,620 ±451
Other Services	4.5% ±1.4 pp1,123 ±354
Public Administration	8.1% ±1.6 pp2,042 ±389
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.1%±0.3 pp21±86	0.2%±0.0 pp—	▼ -0.1%	37/50
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	0.0%±0.3 pp0	0.2%±0.0 pp—	▼ -0.2%	46/50
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.1%±0.3 pp21±86	0.0%±0.0 pp—	▲ +0.1%	7/50
Construction	7.2%±1.6 pp1,799±392	3.8%±0.2 pp—	▲ +3.4%	4/50
Manufacturing	10.6%±1.8 pp2,648±453	7.7%±0.2 pp—	▲ +2.9%	10/50
Wholesale Trade	2.2%±0.8 pp543±199	2.0%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.1%	17/50
Retail Trade	10.0%±1.8 pp2,499±459	8.2%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.7%	13/50
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	8.7%±1.7 pp2,171±432	7.1%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.6%	19/50
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	8.1%±1.7 pp2,024±427	6.5%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.5%	19/50
↳ Utilities	0.6%±0.5 pp147±116	0.5%±0.1 pp—	0%	21/50
Information	0.9%±0.6 pp231±138	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▼ -1.2%	42/50
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	6.3%±1.5 pp1,575±365	8.8%±0.2 pp—	▼ -2.5%	30/50
↳ Finance & Insurance	4.9%±1.4 pp1,236±347	6.7%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.7%	27/50
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.4%±0.6 pp339±152	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.8%	43/50
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	11.2%±2.1 pp2,813±516	18.2%±0.4 pp—	▼ -7.0%	44/50
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	5.8%±1.3 pp1,443±315	13.4%±0.3 pp—	▼ -7.7%	35/50
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.1%±0.3 pp29±87	0.1%±0.0 pp—	0%	25/50
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	5.4%±1.8 pp1,341±446	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.7%	20/50
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	22.5%±2.8 pp5,650±711	24.2%±0.4 pp—	▼ -1.6%	29/50
↳ Educational Services	11.9%±2.2 pp2,977±540	10.5%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.4%	11/50
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	10.7%±2.0 pp2,673±514	13.7%±0.3 pp—	▼ -3.0%	46/50
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	7.8%±1.9 pp1,946±468	9.1%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.4%	29/50
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	1.3%±0.6 pp326±157	2.2%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.9%	43/50
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	6.5%±1.8 pp1,620±451	6.9%±0.2 pp—	▼ -0.5%	27/50
Other Services	4.5%±1.4 pp1,123±354	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▼ -0.1%	30/50
Public Administration	8.1%±1.6 pp2,042±389	4.0%±0.2 pp—	▲ +4.1%	3/50
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category	Ward 13
Private Company Employee	68.3% ±2.2 pp17,125 ±555
Self-Employed	6.3% ±1.5 pp1,585 ±385
Nonprofit	7.4% ±1.9 pp1,859 ±475
Government	17.8% ±2.4 pp4,462 ±603
Unpaid Family Worker	0.1% ±0.3 pp29 ±87
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Private Company Employee	68.3%±2.2 pp17,125±555	67.9%±0.4 pp947,845±5,822	▲ +0.4%	22/50
Self-Employed	6.3%±1.5 pp1,585±385	8.3%±0.2 pp115,690±2,989	▼ -2.0%	42/50
Nonprofit	7.4%±1.9 pp1,859±475	12.1%±0.3 pp169,124±4,035	▼ -4.7%	47/50
Government	17.8%±2.4 pp4,462±603	12.9%±0.3 pp179,945±4,021	▲ +4.9%	14/50
Unpaid Family Worker	0.1%±0.3 pp29±87	0.2%±0.0 pp2,312±408	0%	23/50
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category	Ward 13
Full-Time, Year-Round	70.4% ±2.6 pp18,800 ±682
Part-Time or Part-Year	29.6% ±2.7 pp7,902 ±720
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round	70.4%±2.6 pp18,800±682	67.0%±0.3 pp1,025,726±3,875	▲ +3.4%	13/50
Part-Time or Part-Year	29.6%±2.7 pp7,902±720	33.0%±0.3 pp504,210±4,897	▼ -3.4%	38/50
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category	Ward 13
Average FT Earnings	$71,089±$3,435
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$28,339±$3,265
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$42,247±$2,025
Median FT Earnings	$60,874±$3,084
75th Percentile FT Earnings	$90,609±$3,819
90th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Average FT Earnings	$71,089±$3,435	$96,214±$968	▼ −$25,125	30/50
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$28,339±$3,265	$29,008±$387	▼ −$669	25/50
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$42,247±$2,025	$43,011±$345	▼ −$764	21/50
Median FT Earnings	$60,874±$3,084	$69,663±$530	▼ −$8,789	26/50
75th Percentile FT Earnings	$90,609±$3,819	Over $100,000	▼ −$9,391+	29/50
90th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000	Over $100,000	—	1/50
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$66,977 ±1,427	$69,759 ±2,216	$71,089 ±3,435	▲ +$4,112▲ +$1,330▲ +$2,782
Chicago citywide	$83,170 ±714	$91,467 ±682	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$13,044▲ +$4,747▲ +$8,297
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$50,547 ±1,077	$56,854 ±1,806	$71,089 ±3,435	▲ +$20,542▲ +$14,235▲ +$6,307
Chicago citywide	$62,767 ±539	$74,546 ±556	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$33,447▲ +$21,669▲ +$11,778
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$26,865 ±1,407	$27,451 ±1,513	$28,339 ±3,265	▲ +$1,474▲ +$889▲ +$585
Chicago citywide	$24,209 ±243	$26,113 ±152	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$4,799▲ +$2,895▲ +$1,904
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$20,275 ±1,062	$22,372 ±1,234	$28,339 ±3,265	▲ +$8,065▲ +$5,967▲ +$2,098
Chicago citywide	$18,270 ±183	$21,282 ±124	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$10,738▲ +$7,726▲ +$3,012
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$38,337 ±1,599	$39,143 ±1,323	$42,247 ±2,025	▲ +$3,911▲ +$3,105▲ +$806
Chicago citywide	$37,393 ±278	$39,415 ±229	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$5,618▲ +$3,597▲ +$2,021
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$28,932 ±1,207	$31,902 ±1,078	$42,247 ±2,025	▲ +$13,315▲ +$10,346▲ +$2,970
Chicago citywide	$28,220 ±210	$32,123 ±187	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$14,791▲ +$10,888▲ +$3,903
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$58,516 ±2,043	$57,443 ±2,631	$60,874 ±3,084	▲ +$2,358▲ +$3,431▼ −$1,073
Chicago citywide	$60,575 ±496	$64,628 ±327	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,034▲ +$4,054
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$44,161 ±1,542	$46,816 ±2,144	$60,874 ±3,084	▲ +$16,713▲ +$14,058▲ +$2,655
Chicago citywide	$45,715 ±374	$52,672 ±266	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$23,948▲ +$16,991▲ +$6,957
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$88,323 ±3,639	$88,202 ±4,200	$90,609 ±3,819	▲ +$2,286▲ +$2,407▼ −$121
Chicago citywide	$98,274 ±615	$108,202 ±616	—	——▲ +$9,928
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$66,656 ±2,746	$71,885 ±3,423	$90,609 ±3,819	▲ +$23,953▲ +$18,724▲ +$5,229
Chicago citywide	$74,166 ±464	$88,185 ±502	—	——▲ +$14,019
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$120,452 ±2,897	$122,102 ±2,326	—	——▲ +$1,650
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$90,903 ±2,186	$99,513 ±1,896	—	——▲ +$8,610
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category	Ward 13
Average PT Earnings	$30,457±$5,543
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$2,675±$971
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$8,680±$1,604
Median PT Earnings	$18,001±$2,254
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$40,099±$5,852
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$67,226±$9,487
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Average PT Earnings	$30,457±$5,543	$33,575±$750	▼ −$3,118	22/50
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$2,675±$971	$2,183±$87	▲ +$492	16/50
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$8,680±$1,604	$7,222±$206	▲ +$1,459	17/50
Median PT Earnings	$18,001±$2,254	$19,180±$393	▼ −$1,179	24/50
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$40,099±$5,852	$38,498±$681	▲ +$1,601	17/50
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$67,226±$9,487	$73,776±$1,391	▼ −$6,550	23/50
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$24,814 ±1,476	$26,895 ±2,511	$30,457 ±5,543	▲ +$5,643▲ +$3,562▲ +$2,081
Chicago citywide	$27,076 ±473	$31,236 ±676	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$6,500▲ +$2,340▲ +$4,160
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$18,727 ±1,114	$21,920 ±2,047	$30,457 ±5,543	▲ +$11,730▲ +$8,537▲ +$3,193
Chicago citywide	$20,433 ±357	$25,457 ±551	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$13,142▲ +$8,118▲ +$5,024
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,789 ±545	$2,369 ±460	$2,675 ±971	▼ −$114▲ +$307▼ −$421
Chicago citywide	$2,230 ±48	$2,283 ±59	$2,183 ±87	▼ −$47▼ −$100▲ +$53
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$2,105 ±411	$1,931 ±375	$2,675 ±971	▲ +$570▲ +$745▼ −$175
Chicago citywide	$1,683 ±36	$1,861 ±48	$2,183 ±87	▲ +$500▲ +$322▲ +$178
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$7,788 ±1,086	$7,171 ±1,130	$8,680 ±1,604	▲ +$893▲ +$1,509▼ −$617
Chicago citywide	$6,390 ±123	$6,841 ±156	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$832▲ +$381▲ +$451
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$5,877 ±820	$5,844 ±921	$8,680 ±1,604	▲ +$2,803▲ +$2,836▼ −$33
Chicago citywide	$4,822 ±93	$5,575 ±127	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$2,399▲ +$1,646▲ +$753
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$16,347 ±1,235	$16,765 ±2,113	$18,001 ±2,254	▲ +$1,654▲ +$1,236▲ +$418
Chicago citywide	$15,461 ±166	$17,025 ±275	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$3,719▲ +$2,155▲ +$1,563
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$12,337 ±932	$13,663 ±1,722	$18,001 ±2,254	▲ +$5,664▲ +$4,338▲ +$1,326
Chicago citywide	$11,668 ±125	$13,875 ±224	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$7,512▲ +$5,305▲ +$2,207
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$31,370 ±3,297	$33,960 ±4,176	$40,099 ±5,852	▲ +$8,730▲ +$6,139▲ +$2,590
Chicago citywide	$30,795 ±619	$34,779 ±505	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$7,703▲ +$3,719▲ +$3,984
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$23,674 ±2,488	$27,678 ±3,404	$40,099 ±5,852	▲ +$16,425▲ +$12,422▲ +$4,003
Chicago citywide	$23,241 ±468	$28,345 ±412	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$15,257▲ +$10,153▲ +$5,104
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$60,893 ±6,277	$63,509 ±11,248	$67,226 ±9,487	▲ +$6,333▲ +$3,717▲ +$2,615
Chicago citywide	$61,207 ±1,249	$68,040 ±1,298	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$12,570▲ +$5,737▲ +$6,833
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$45,955 ±4,737	$51,760 ±9,168	$67,226 ±9,487	▲ +$21,271▲ +$15,466▲ +$5,805
Chicago citywide	$46,192 ±942	$55,452 ±1,058	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$27,585▲ +$18,324▲ +$9,261

Earnings of All Workers

Category	Ward 13
Average Earnings	$58,944±$2,209
10th Percentile Earnings	$9,865±$1,757
25th Percentile Earnings	$26,999±$3,404
Median Earnings	$50,950±$2,350
75th Percentile Earnings	$79,076±$4,436
90th Percentile Earnings	Over $100,000
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Average Earnings	$58,944±$2,209	$75,571±$768	▼ −$16,627	27/50
10th Percentile Earnings	$9,865±$1,757	$8,529±$272	▲ +$1,336	18/50
25th Percentile Earnings	$26,999±$3,404	$25,183±$358	▲ +$1,816	20/50
Median Earnings	$50,950±$2,350	$51,367±$471	▼ −$417	20/50
75th Percentile Earnings	$79,076±$4,436	$93,324±$598	▼ −$14,248	27/50
90th Percentile Earnings	Over $100,000	Over $100,000	—	1/50
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$51,737 ±900	$56,459 ±1,615	$58,944 ±2,209	▲ +$7,207▲ +$2,485▲ +$4,722
Chicago citywide	$62,453 ±534	$71,626 ±551	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$13,118▲ +$3,945▲ +$9,173
Average Earnings (nominal dollars)	$39,045 ±679	$46,014 ±1,316	$58,944 ±2,209	▲ +$19,899▲ +$12,930▲ +$6,969
Chicago citywide	$47,133 ±403	$58,375 ±449	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$28,438▲ +$17,196▲ +$11,243
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$8,560 ±1,189	$9,137 ±1,421	$9,865 ±1,757	▲ +$1,305▲ +$728▲ +$577
Chicago citywide	$6,858 ±139	$8,358 ±164	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$1,671▲ +$171▲ +$1,500
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$6,460 ±897	$7,447 ±1,158	$9,865 ±1,757	▲ +$3,405▲ +$2,418▲ +$987
Chicago citywide	$5,176 ±105	$6,812 ±134	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$3,354▲ +$1,717▲ +$1,636
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$21,409 ±1,515	$25,042 ±1,432	$26,999 ±3,404	▲ +$5,590▲ +$1,957▲ +$3,633
Chicago citywide	$19,598 ±241	$23,173 ±290	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$5,585▲ +$2,010▲ +$3,576
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$16,157 ±1,143	$20,409 ±1,167	$26,999 ±3,404	▲ +$10,842▲ +$6,589▲ +$4,252
Chicago citywide	$14,790 ±182	$18,886 ±236	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$10,393▲ +$6,297▲ +$4,096
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$42,971 ±2,183	$45,646 ±2,469	$50,950 ±2,350	▲ +$7,979▲ +$5,304▲ +$2,675
Chicago citywide	$42,365 ±293	$47,195 ±370	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$9,002▲ +$4,172▲ +$4,830
Median Earnings (nominal dollars)	$32,430 ±1,647	$37,202 ±2,012	$50,950 ±2,350	▲ +$18,521▲ +$13,749▲ +$4,772
Chicago citywide	$31,972 ±221	$38,464 ±302	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$19,395▲ +$12,903▲ +$6,492
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$72,697 ±2,799	$75,418 ±3,071	$79,076 ±4,436	▲ +$6,379▲ +$3,658▲ +$2,721
Chicago citywide	$78,784 ±555	$87,853 ±597	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$14,540▲ +$5,471▲ +$9,069
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$54,863 ±2,112	$61,466 ±2,503	$79,076 ±4,436	▲ +$24,213▲ +$17,610▲ +$6,602
Chicago citywide	$59,457 ±418	$71,600 ±486	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$33,867▲ +$21,723▲ +$12,144
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$109,415 ±3,830	$114,620 ±3,495	—	——▲ +$5,205
Chicago citywide	$128,659 ±682	—	—	———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$82,574 ±2,890	$93,415 ±2,848	—	——▲ +$10,842
Chicago citywide	$97,097 ±515	—	—	———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 13

Category	Ward 13
Household income at age 35	$67,958 ±$1,109
Household income percentile rank	56.7 ±0.57 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	26.4% ±0.90 pp
Individual income at age 35	$46,579 ±$692
Fraction married	47.2% ±1.02 pp
Employment rate	79.8% ±0.82 pp
Incarceration rate	0.64% ±0.18 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 13. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 13 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$67,958 ±$1,109	$43,090 ±$102	+$24,869
Household income percentile rank	56.7 ±0.57 pp	40.9 ±0.06 pp	+15.9 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	26.4% ±0.90 pp	11.4% ±0.08 pp	+15.0 pp
Individual income at age 35	$46,579 ±$692	$33,544 ±$80	+$13,034
Fraction married	47.2% ±1.02 pp	26.4% ±0.11 pp	+20.9 pp
Employment rate	79.8% ±0.82 pp	74.4% ±0.11 pp	+5.4 pp
Incarceration rate	0.64% ±0.18 pp	2.87% ±0.05 pp	−2.2 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 13. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 13 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 13 in Lower-Income Families

Category	Ward 13
Household income at age 35	$50,254 ±$1,702
Household income percentile rank	46.3 ±1.08 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	15.4% ±1.47 pp
Individual income at age 35	$36,356 ±$1,231
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 13 with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 13 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$50,254 ±$1,702	$34,711 ±$124	+$15,542
Household income percentile rank	46.3 ±1.08 pp	35.3 ±0.09 pp	+10.9 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	15.4% ±1.47 pp	6.31% ±0.09 pp	+9.1 pp
Individual income at age 35	$36,356 ±$1,231	$28,716 ±$106	+$7,639
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 13 with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 13 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Ward 13

Category	Ward 13
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	86.9% ±0.69 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	24.1% ±0.88 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 13. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 13 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	86.9% ±0.69 pp	78.1% ±0.11 pp	+8.7 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	24.1% ±0.88 pp	22.9% ±0.11 pp	+1.3 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 13. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 13 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Ward 13

Category	Ward 13
All jobs located in ward 13	13,337
Ward 13 jobs held by Ward 13 residents	6.0%
Ward 13 jobs held by non-Ward 13 residents	94.0%
Employed residents working in Ward 13	3.4%
Employed residents working outside Ward 13	96.6%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 13	Chicago ward median	Difference	Rank
All jobs located in ward 13	13,337	11,093	▲ +2,244	23/50
Ward 13 jobs held by Ward 13 residents	6.0%	6.3%	▼ −0.3 pp	27/50
Ward 13 jobs held by non-Ward 13 residents	94.0%	93.7%	▲ +0.3 pp	24/50
Employed residents working in Ward 13	3.4%	3.2%	▲ +0.2 pp	23/50
Employed residents working outside Ward 13	96.6%	96.8%	▼ −0.2 pp	28/50
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in ward 13	11,703	12,767	13,337	▲ +1,634▲ +570▲ +1,064
Chicago citywide	10,920	11,554	11,093	▲ +174▼ −460▲ +634
Ward 13 jobs held by Ward 13 residents	6.5%717	5.9%713	6.0%762	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +45▲ +0.1 pp▲ +49▼ −0.6 pp▼ −4
Chicago citywide	6.4%696	6.4%725	6.3%701	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5▼ −0.1 pp▼ −24– 0.0 pp▲ +29
Ward 13 jobs held by non-Ward 13 residents	93.5%10,308	94.1%11,363	94.0%11,949	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +1,641▼ −0.1 pp▲ +586▲ +0.6 pp▲ +1,055
Chicago citywide	93.6%9,244	93.6%9,497	93.7%9,122	▲ +0.1 pp▼ −122▲ +0.1 pp▼ −375– 0.0 pp▲ +253
Employed residents working in Ward 13	3.3%717	3.2%713	3.4%762	– 0.0 pp▲ +45▲ +0.2 pp▲ +49▼ −0.2 pp▼ −4
Chicago citywide	3.3%696	3.0%725	3.2%701	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5▲ +0.1 pp▼ −24▼ −0.2 pp▲ +29
Employed residents working outside Ward 13	96.7%20,783	96.8%21,836	96.6%21,860	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,077▼ −0.2 pp▲ +24▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,053
Chicago citywide	96.7%19,233	97.0%20,782	96.8%20,998	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,765▼ −0.1 pp▲ +216▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,549

Industry of Jobs in Ward 13

Category	Ward 13
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%4
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%4
Construction	2.3%312
Manufacturing	6.2%832
Wholesale Trade	1.3%178
Retail Trade	4.3%574
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	54.3%7,243
↳ Utilities	0.0%2
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	54.3%7,241
Information	0.1%13
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	2.3%301
↳ Finance & Insurance	1.9%251
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	0.4%50
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	9.9%1,315
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	1.6%207
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%6
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	8.3%1,102
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	7.0%940
↳ Educational Services	0.9%115
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	6.2%825
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	9.0%1,197
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	0.1%11
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	8.9%1,186
Other Services	1.4%183
Public Administration	1.8%245
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%4	0.0%423	0%	12/50
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%4	0.0%36	0%	1/50
Construction	2.3%312	1.9%27,207	▲ +0.5%	25/50
Manufacturing	6.2%832	4.4%64,747	▲ +1.8%	26/50
Wholesale Trade	1.3%178	2.8%41,460	▼ -1.5%	34/50
Retail Trade	4.3%574	6.6%96,413	▼ -2.3%	44/50
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	54.3%7,243	6.0%87,845	▲ +48.3%	1/50
↳ Utilities	0.0%2	0.3%5,012	▼ -0.3%	15/50
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	54.3%7,241	5.7%82,833	▲ +48.6%	1/50
Information	0.1%13	3.5%51,095	▼ -3.4%	45/50
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	2.3%301	10.8%157,520	▼ -8.5%	40/50
↳ Finance & Insurance	1.9%251	8.6%125,824	▼ -6.7%	25/50
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	0.4%50	2.2%31,696	▼ -1.8%	49/50
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	9.9%1,315	23.2%339,220	▼ -13.3%	31/50
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	1.6%207	14.2%207,444	▼ -12.6%	42/50
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%6	1.2%16,872	▼ -1.1%	28/50
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	8.3%1,102	7.9%114,904	▲ +0.4%	15/50
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	7.0%940	23.0%336,089	▼ -15.9%	47/50
↳ Educational Services	0.9%115	9.2%134,671	▼ -8.3%	49/50
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	6.2%825	13.8%201,418	▼ -7.6%	46/50
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	9.0%1,197	10.3%151,055	▼ -1.3%	32/50
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	0.1%11	1.9%27,339	▼ -1.8%	45/50
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	8.9%1,186	8.5%123,716	▲ +0.4%	30/50
Other Services	1.4%183	4.0%59,136	▼ -2.7%	49/50
Public Administration	1.8%245	3.5%51,418	▼ -1.7%	4/50
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%2	0.0%1	0.0%4	– 0.0 pp▲ +2– 0.0 pp▲ +3– 0.0 pp▼ −1
Chicago citywide	0.0%181	0.0%569	0.0%423	– 0.0 pp▲ +242– 0.0 pp▼ −146– 0.0 pp▲ +388
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%2	0.0%1	0.0%4	– 0.0 pp▲ +2– 0.0 pp▲ +3– 0.0 pp▼ −1
Chicago citywide	0.0%140	0.0%374	0.0%36	– 0.0 pp▼ −104– 0.0 pp▼ −338– 0.0 pp▲ +234
Construction	5.0%587	7.0%895	2.3%312	▼ −2.7 pp▼ −275▼ −4.7 pp▼ −583▲ +2.0 pp▲ +308
Chicago citywide	1.6%20,789	1.8%26,012	1.9%27,207	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,418– 0.0 pp▲ +1,195▲ +0.3 pp▲ +5,223
Manufacturing	8.8%1,032	6.7%861	6.2%832	▼ −2.6 pp▼ −200▼ −0.5 pp▼ −29▼ −2.1 pp▼ −171
Chicago citywide	4.6%61,066	4.5%63,597	4.4%64,747	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,681▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,150▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,531
Wholesale Trade	6.0%708	2.2%280	1.3%178	▼ −4.7 pp▼ −530▼ −0.9 pp▼ −102▼ −3.9 pp▼ −428
Chicago citywide	3.0%39,431	2.9%41,789	2.8%41,460	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,029▼ −0.1 pp▼ −329▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,358
Retail Trade	5.5%642	4.8%609	4.3%574	▼ −1.2 pp▼ −68▼ −0.5 pp▼ −35▼ −0.7 pp▼ −33
Chicago citywide	7.4%97,262	6.9%97,836	6.6%96,413	▼ −0.8 pp▼ −849▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,423▼ −0.5 pp▲ +574
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	43.4%5,074	48.7%6,213	54.3%7,243	▲ +11.0 pp▲ +2,169▲ +5.6 pp▲ +1,030▲ +5.3 pp▲ +1,139
Chicago citywide	5.4%71,371	5.6%79,303	6.0%87,845	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +16,474▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,542▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,932
Utilities	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%2	– 0.0 pp▲ +2– 0.0 pp▲ +2– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,383	0.3%4,956	0.3%5,012	– 0.0 pp▲ +629– 0.0 pp▲ +56– 0.0 pp▲ +573
Transportation & Warehousing	43.4%5,074	48.7%6,213	54.3%7,241	▲ +10.9 pp▲ +2,167▲ +5.6 pp▲ +1,028▲ +5.3 pp▲ +1,139
Chicago citywide	5.1%66,988	5.2%74,347	5.7%82,833	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +15,845▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,486▲ +0.1 pp▲ +7,359
Information	0.2%19	0.1%13	0.1%13	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −6– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.1 pp▼ −6
Chicago citywide	3.1%40,514	3.4%48,135	3.5%51,095	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +10,581▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,960▲ +0.3 pp▲ +7,621
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	7.8%917	3.8%485	2.3%301	▼ −5.6 pp▼ −616▼ −1.5 pp▼ −184▼ −4.0 pp▼ −432
Chicago citywide	10.5%138,287	10.6%150,163	10.8%157,520	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +19,233▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,357▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,876
Finance & Insurance	3.8%449	2.4%304	1.9%251	▼ −2.0 pp▼ −198▼ −0.5 pp▼ −53▼ −1.5 pp▼ −145
Chicago citywide	8.5%111,307	8.4%119,147	8.6%125,824	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14,517▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,677▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7,840
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	4.0%468	1.4%181	0.4%50	▼ −3.6 pp▼ −418▼ −1.0 pp▼ −131▼ −2.6 pp▼ −287
Chicago citywide	2.1%26,980	2.2%31,016	2.2%31,696	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,716– 0.0 pp▲ +680▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,036
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	6.6%774	7.4%940	9.9%1,315	▲ +3.2 pp▲ +541▲ +2.5 pp▲ +375▲ +0.7 pp▲ +166
Chicago citywide	21.2%278,928	22.6%319,744	23.2%339,220	▲ +2.0 pp▲ +60,292▲ +0.6 pp▲ +19,476▲ +1.3 pp▲ +40,816
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	4.3%507	1.3%162	1.6%207	▼ −2.8 pp▼ −300▲ +0.3 pp▲ +45▼ −3.1 pp▼ −345
Chicago citywide	11.8%155,200	12.9%182,462	14.2%207,444	▲ +2.4 pp▲ +52,244▲ +1.3 pp▲ +24,982▲ +1.1 pp▲ +27,262
Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.1%7	0.1%7	0.0%6	– 0.0 pp▼ −1– 0.0 pp▼ −1– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	1.0%13,619	1.2%16,600	1.2%16,872	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,253– 0.0 pp▲ +272▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,981
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	2.2%260	6.0%771	8.3%1,102	▲ +6.0 pp▲ +842▲ +2.2 pp▲ +331▲ +3.8 pp▲ +511
Chicago citywide	8.4%110,109	8.5%120,682	7.9%114,904	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +4,795▼ −0.7 pp▼ −5,778▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,573
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	5.8%673	4.7%598	7.0%940	▲ +1.3 pp▲ +267▲ +2.4 pp▲ +342▼ −1.1 pp▼ −75
Chicago citywide	23.5%308,633	22.1%313,540	23.0%336,089	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +27,456▲ +0.8 pp▲ +22,549▼ −1.4 pp▲ +4,907
Educational Services	1.5%180	0.9%119	0.9%115	▼ −0.7 pp▼ −65▼ −0.1 pp▼ −4▼ −0.6 pp▼ −61
Chicago citywide	10.1%132,909	9.0%128,169	9.2%134,671	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +1,762▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,502▼ −1.1 pp▼ −4,740
Health Care & Social Assistance	4.2%493	3.8%479	6.2%825	▲ +2.0 pp▲ +332▲ +2.4 pp▲ +346▼ −0.5 pp▼ −14
Chicago citywide	13.4%175,724	13.1%185,371	13.8%201,418	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +25,694▲ +0.7 pp▲ +16,047▼ −0.3 pp▲ +9,647
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	7.6%892	11.8%1,507	9.0%1,197	▲ +1.4 pp▲ +305▼ −2.8 pp▼ −310▲ +4.2 pp▲ +615
Chicago citywide	10.9%143,753	11.5%162,749	10.3%151,055	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,302▼ −1.2 pp▼ −11,694▲ +0.5 pp▲ +18,996
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	0.0%5	0.0%4	0.1%11	– 0.0 pp▲ +6▲ +0.1 pp▲ +7– 0.0 pp▼ −1
Chicago citywide	1.7%22,179	2.1%30,178	1.9%27,339	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +5,160▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,839▲ +0.4 pp▲ +7,999
Accommodation & Food Services	7.6%887	11.8%1,503	8.9%1,186	▲ +1.3 pp▲ +299▼ −2.9 pp▼ −317▲ +4.2 pp▲ +616
Chicago citywide	9.3%121,574	9.4%132,571	8.5%123,716	▼ −0.8 pp▲ +2,142▼ −0.9 pp▼ −8,855▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,997
Other Services	1.5%176	1.2%159	1.4%183	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7▲ +0.1 pp▲ +24▼ −0.3 pp▼ −17
Chicago citywide	4.5%59,098	4.4%61,698	4.0%59,136	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +38▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,562▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,600
Public Administration	1.8%207	1.6%206	1.8%245	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +38▲ +0.2 pp▲ +39▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1
Chicago citywide	4.2%54,814	3.6%51,684	3.5%51,418	▼ −0.7 pp▼ −3,396▼ −0.1 pp▼ −266▼ −0.5 pp▼ −3,130

Earnings of Jobs in Ward 13

Category	Ward 13
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	11.9%1,588
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	28.3%3,781
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	59.7%7,968
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	11.9%1,588	12.7%185,297	▼ -0.8%	44/50
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	28.3%3,781	20.5%299,480	▲ +7.9%	38/50
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	59.7%7,968	66.9%978,851	▼ -7.1%	9/50
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	17.0%1,993	14.3%1,822	11.9%1,588	▼ −5.1 pp▼ −405▼ −2.4 pp▼ −234▼ −2.8 pp▼ −171
Chicago citywide	21.3%280,137	16.8%238,135	12.7%185,297	▼ −8.7 pp▼ −94,840▼ −4.1 pp▼ −52,838▼ −4.5 pp▼ −42,002
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	37.6%4,400	33.3%4,256	28.3%3,781	▼ −9.2 pp▼ −619▼ −5.0 pp▼ −475▼ −4.3 pp▼ −144
Chicago citywide	30.7%403,250	26.7%378,530	20.5%299,480	▼ −10.2 pp▼ −103,770▼ −6.3 pp▼ −79,050▼ −4.0 pp▼ −24,720
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	45.4%5,310	52.4%6,689	59.7%7,968	▲ +14.4 pp▲ +2,658▲ +7.4 pp▲ +1,279▲ +7.0 pp▲ +1,379
Chicago citywide	48.0%630,740	56.5%800,154	66.9%978,851	▲ +18.9 pp▲ +348,111▲ +10.4 pp▲ +178,697▲ +8.5 pp▲ +169,414

Jobs in Ward 13 by Firm Age

Category	Ward 13
Firm age: 0–1 years	1.7%217
Firm age: 2–3 years	1.3%168
Firm age: 4–5 years	3.1%411
Firm age: 6–10 years	3.7%480
Firm age: 11 or more years	90.3%11,816
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years	1.7%217	2.8%37,293	▼ -1.2%	45/50
Firm age: 2–3 years	1.3%168	2.8%37,154	▼ -1.5%	49/50
Firm age: 4–5 years	3.1%411	3.2%41,869	0%	28/50
Firm age: 6–10 years	3.7%480	7.8%102,354	▼ -4.1%	48/50
Firm age: 11 or more years	90.3%11,816	83.4%1,098,247	▲ +6.9%	4/50
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years	2.3%264	1.2%150	1.7%217	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −47▲ +0.5 pp▲ +67▼ −1.1 pp▼ −114
Chicago citywide	2.9%33,224	2.6%33,244	2.8%37,293	– 0.0 pp▲ +4,069▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,049▼ −0.2 pp▲ +20
Firm age: 2–3 years	2.9%337	2.1%259	1.3%168	▼ −1.6 pp▼ −169▼ −0.8 pp▼ −91▼ −0.9 pp▼ −78
Chicago citywide	4.0%46,935	3.3%42,284	2.8%37,154	▼ −1.2 pp▼ −9,781▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,130▼ −0.7 pp▼ −4,651
Firm age: 4–5 years	1.7%200	3.0%374	3.1%411	▲ +1.4 pp▲ +211▲ +0.2 pp▲ +37▲ +1.2 pp▲ +174
Chicago citywide	3.7%42,688	3.6%46,058	3.2%41,869	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −819▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,189▼ −0.1 pp▲ +3,370
Firm age: 6–10 years	10.0%1,149	6.4%809	3.7%480	▼ −6.3 pp▼ −669▼ −2.8 pp▼ −329▼ −3.6 pp▼ −340
Chicago citywide	8.2%94,955	8.6%109,934	7.8%102,354	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +7,399▼ −0.9 pp▼ −7,580▲ +0.5 pp▲ +14,979
Firm age: 11 or more years	83.0%9,546	87.3%10,969	90.3%11,816	▲ +7.2 pp▲ +2,270▲ +2.9 pp▲ +847▲ +4.3 pp▲ +1,423
Chicago citywide	81.3%946,852	81.8%1,043,037	83.4%1,098,247	▲ +2.1 pp▲ +151,395▲ +1.6 pp▲ +55,210▲ +0.5 pp▲ +96,185

Jobs in Ward 13 by Firm Size

Category	Ward 13
Firm size: 0–19 employees	15.7%2,052
Firm size: 20–49 employees	6.4%842
Firm size: 50–249 employees	10.0%1,311
Firm size: 250–499 employees	0.4%52
Firm size: 500 or more employees	67.5%8,835
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees	15.7%2,052	12.8%168,975	▲ +2.8%	36/50
Firm size: 20–49 employees	6.4%842	7.3%96,432	▼ -0.9%	40/50
Firm size: 50–249 employees	10.0%1,311	13.8%181,123	▼ -3.7%	45/50
Firm size: 250–499 employees	0.4%52	5.7%74,787	▼ -5.3%	47/50
Firm size: 500 or more employees	67.5%8,835	60.4%795,600	▲ +7.1%	8/50
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees	17.1%1,970	15.7%1,972	15.7%2,052	▼ −1.5 pp▲ +82– 0.0 pp▲ +80▼ −1.4 pp▲ +2
Chicago citywide	13.9%162,248	13.3%169,949	12.8%168,975	▼ −1.1 pp▲ +6,727▼ −0.5 pp▼ −974▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,701
Firm size: 20–49 employees	8.2%945	7.0%874	6.4%842	▼ −1.8 pp▼ −103▼ −0.5 pp▼ −32▼ −1.3 pp▼ −71
Chicago citywide	8.4%97,503	8.2%103,945	7.3%96,432	▼ −1.0 pp▼ −1,071▼ −0.8 pp▼ −7,513▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,442
Firm size: 50–249 employees	11.2%1,291	11.1%1,393	10.0%1,311	▼ −1.2 pp▲ +20▼ −1.1 pp▼ −82▼ −0.1 pp▲ +102
Chicago citywide	15.7%183,275	14.9%189,930	13.8%181,123	▼ −2.0 pp▼ −2,152▼ −1.1 pp▼ −8,807▼ −0.8 pp▲ +6,655
Firm size: 250–499 employees	6.8%782	0.3%32	0.4%52	▼ −6.4 pp▼ −730▲ +0.1 pp▲ +20▼ −6.5 pp▼ −750
Chicago citywide	6.3%72,992	5.9%74,603	5.7%74,787	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,795▼ −0.2 pp▲ +184▼ −0.4 pp▲ +1,611
Firm size: 500 or more employees	56.6%6,508	66.0%8,290	67.5%8,835	▲ +10.9 pp▲ +2,327▲ +1.5 pp▲ +545▲ +9.4 pp▲ +1,782
Chicago citywide	55.7%648,636	57.8%736,130	60.4%795,600	▲ +4.7 pp▲ +146,964▲ +2.7 pp▲ +59,470▲ +2.1 pp▲ +87,494

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 13
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	16.4% ±1.7 pp16.4%±1.7 pp8,654 ±875
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	75.4% ±4.4 pp12.4%±0.7 pp6,528 ±378
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	24.6% ±5.7 pp4.0%±0.9 pp2,126 ±491
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	16.4%±1.7 pp16.4%±1.7 pp8,654±875	13.5%±0.2 pp13.5%±0.2 pp365,577±5,480	▲ +3.0%▲ +3.0%	14/50
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	75.4%±4.4 pp12.4%±0.7 pp6,528±378	83.0%±0.5 pp11.2%±0.1 pp303,520±1,897	▼ -7.6%▲ +1.2%	39/5022/50
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	24.6%±5.7 pp4.0%±0.9 pp2,126±491	17.0%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.1 pp62,057±2,247	▲ +7.6%▲ +1.8%	12/505/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 13
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	5.5% ±0.9 pp5.5%±0.9 pp2,888 ±457
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	77.7% ±8.6 pp4.3%±0.5 pp2,244 ±249
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	22.3% ±5.0 pp1.2%±0.3 pp644 ±145
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	80.7% ±7.7 pp4.4%±0.4 pp2,329 ±222
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	19.3% ±7.1 pp1.1%±0.4 pp558 ±205
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	5.5%±0.9 pp5.5%±0.9 pp2,888±457	7.4%±0.1 pp7.4%±0.1 pp201,851±4,036	▼ -2.0%▼ -2.0%	36/50
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	77.7%±8.6 pp4.3%±0.5 pp2,244±249	52.4%±0.7 pp3.9%±0.1 pp105,720±1,511	▲ +25.3%▲ +0.4%	2/5015/50
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	22.3%±5.0 pp1.2%±0.3 pp644±145	47.6%±1.2 pp3.5%±0.1 pp96,131±2,437	▼ -25.3%▼ -2.3%	49/5045/50
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	80.7%±7.7 pp4.4%±0.4 pp2,329±222	67.0%±1.0 pp5.0%±0.1 pp135,301±1,945	▲ +13.6%▼ -0.6%	13/5025/50
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	19.3%±7.1 pp1.1%±0.4 pp558±205	33.0%±1.2 pp2.5%±0.1 pp66,550±2,459	▼ -13.6%▼ -1.4%	38/5038/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category	Ward 13
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	3.0% ±2.4 pp287 ±228
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	2.4% ±3.2 pp69 ±92
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	3.0%±2.4 pp287±228	5.9%±0.5 pp—	▼ -2.8%	35/50
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	2.4%±3.2 pp69±92	5.4%±0.6 pp—	▼ -3.0%	43/50
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category	Ward 13
Owner-Occupied Households	77.4% ±2.2 pp14,892 ±422
Renter-Occupied Households	22.6% ±3.6 pp4,342 ±693
Owner-Occupied Residents	79.7% ±1.6 pp41,917 ±821
Renter-Occupied Residents	20.3% ±4.4 pp10,658 ±2,290
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Owner-Occupied Households	77.4%±2.2 pp14,892±422	46.0%±0.4 pp534,012±4,939	▲ +31.4%	3/50
Renter-Occupied Households	22.6%±3.6 pp4,342±693	54.0%±0.4 pp626,193±5,183	▼ -31.4%	48/50
Owner-Occupied Residents	79.7%±1.6 pp41,917±821	51.8%±0.5 pp1,377,219±13,574	▲ +27.9%	3/50
Renter-Occupied Residents	20.3%±4.4 pp10,658±2,290	48.2%±0.5 pp1,280,665±13,500	▼ -27.9%	48/50
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category	Ward 13
Median Year Moved In	2010±1.1 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later	1.7% ±0.9 pp326 ±167
Moved in 2020 to 2022	14.5% ±2.5 pp2,794 ±476
Moved in 2010 to 2019	34.8% ±3.9 pp6,694 ±754
Moved in 2000 to 2009	24.8% ±3.2 pp4,780 ±620
Moved in 1990 to 1999	11.0% ±2.0 pp2,125 ±385
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	13.2% ±1.8 pp2,542 ±347
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Moved In	2010±1.1 yr	2015±1.0 yr	▼ −5	40/50
Moved in 2023 or Later	1.7%±0.9 pp326±167	5.9%±0.2 pp68,884±2,742	▼ -4.2%	48/50
Moved in 2020 to 2022	14.5%±2.5 pp2,794±476	24.1%±0.4 pp279,417±5,059	▼ -9.6%	39/50
Moved in 2010 to 2019	34.8%±3.9 pp6,694±754	39.2%±0.5 pp455,125±5,772	▼ -4.5%	43/50
Moved in 2000 to 2009	24.8%±3.2 pp4,780±620	13.8%±0.3 pp160,353±3,324	▲ +11.0%	1/50
Moved in 1990 to 1999	11.0%±2.0 pp2,125±385	8.2%±0.2 pp95,243±2,390	▲ +2.8%	13/50
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	13.2%±1.8 pp2,542±347	8.7%±0.2 pp101,183±2,362	▲ +4.5%	15/50
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 13
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	4.6% ±1.3 pp4.6%±1.3 pp2,396 ±682
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	4.2% ±1.3 pp90.7%±10.0 pp2,174 ±663
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	0.2% ±0.2 pp4.3%±4.7 pp102 ±117
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	0.2% ±0.2 pp4.3%±4.3 pp103 ±106
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	0.0% ±0.1 pp0.7%±2.5 pp17 ±59
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	4.6%±1.3 pp4.6%±1.3 pp2,396±682	14.0%±0.3 pp14.0%±0.3 pp375,475±8,289	▼ -9.4%▼ -9.4%	46/50
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	4.2%±1.3 pp90.7%±10.0 pp2,174±663	9.8%±0.3 pp69.9%±1.0 pp262,365±6,953	▼ -5.6%▲ +20.9%	44/501/50
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	0.2%±0.2 pp4.3%±4.7 pp102±117	0.8%±0.1 pp5.5%±0.4 pp20,552±1,626	▼ -0.6%▼ -1.2%	38/5028/50
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	0.2%±0.2 pp4.3%±4.3 pp103±106	2.5%±0.1 pp17.6%±0.7 pp65,936±2,918	▼ -2.3%▼ -13.3%	47/5044/50
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	0.0%±0.1 pp0.7%±2.5 pp17±59	1.0%±0.1 pp7.1%±0.8 pp26,622±3,040	▼ -1.0%▼ -6.4%	49/5049/50
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 13
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	4.1% ±1.3 pp4.1%±1.3 pp832 ±261
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	1.1% ±0.8 pp26.3%±16.4 pp219 ±153
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.7% ±0.6 pp16.3%±14.1 pp136 ±125
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.0% ±0.3 pp0.0%0
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	2.4% ±1.1 pp57.3%±20.4 pp477 ±226
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	4.8% ±3.3 pp4.8%±3.3 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	0.9% ±0.8 pp0.9%±0.8 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	4.1%±1.3 pp4.1%±1.3 pp832±261	9.1%±0.2 pp9.1%±0.2 pp116,849±2,682	▼ -5.0%▼ -5.0%	48/50
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	1.1%±0.8 pp26.3%±16.4 pp219±153	2.5%±0.1 pp27.1%±1.4 pp31,723±1,796	▼ -1.4%▼ -0.8%	45/5023/50
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.7%±0.6 pp16.3%±14.1 pp136±125	0.6%±0.1 pp6.0%±0.7 pp7,037±795	▲ +0.1%▲ +10.3%	17/503/50
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.0%±0.3 pp0.0%0	0.2%±0.0 pp2.4%±0.5 pp2,831±587	▼ -0.2%▼ -2.4%	39/5039/50
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	2.4%±1.1 pp57.3%±20.4 pp477±226	5.9%±0.3 pp64.4%±2.5 pp75,258±3,387	▼ -3.5%▼ -7.1%	49/5036/50
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	4.8%±3.3 pp4.8%±3.3 pp—	4.8%±0.3 pp4.8%±0.3 pp—	0%0%	23/50
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	0.9%±0.8 pp0.9%±0.8 pp—	1.3%±0.1 pp1.3%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.4%▼ -0.4%	32/50
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category	Ward 13
Median Year Built	1957±1 yr
Pre-1940	12.5% ±2.2 pp2,510 ±443
1940-2009	86.7% ±4.7 pp17,422 ±935
2010+	0.8% ±0.7 pp164 ±133
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Built	1957±1 yr	1953±1 yr	▲ +4 yrs	13/50
Pre-1940	12.5%±2.2 pp2,510±443	38.8%±0.4 pp495,715±4,678	▼ -26.3%	48/50
1940-2009	86.7%±4.7 pp17,422±935	54.9%±0.6 pp700,698±7,435	▲ +31.8%	2/50
2010+	0.8%±0.7 pp164±133	6.3%±0.2 pp80,641±2,725	▼ -5.5%	49/50
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category	Ward 13
Population Density	9,917 /sq mi±595/sq mi
Single-Family Homes	72.8% ±3.1 pp14,637 ±619
Buildings With 2–4 Units	13.6% ±2.7 pp2,738 ±535
Buildings With 5–19 Units	11.6% ±2.0 pp2,334 ±402
Buildings With 20 or More Units	1.4% ±0.9 pp286 ±185
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Population Density	9,917 /sq mi±595/sq mi	11,721 /sq mi±26/sq mi	▼ −1,804 /sq mi	38/50
Single-Family Homes	72.8%±3.1 pp14,637±619	29.2%±0.3 pp372,679±3,989	▲ +43.6%	5/50
Buildings With 2–4 Units	13.6%±2.7 pp2,738±535	27.4%±0.4 pp349,976±4,957	▼ -13.8%	38/50
Buildings With 5–19 Units	11.6%±2.0 pp2,334±402	16.2%±0.3 pp206,420±4,124	▼ -4.5%	35/50
Buildings With 20 or More Units	1.4%±0.9 pp286±185	27.0%±0.3 pp344,543±4,438	▼ -25.6%	50/50
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category	Ward 13
Studio	1.3% ±0.9 pp254 ±178
1 Bedroom	4.6% ±1.1 pp933 ±225
2 Bedrooms	27.8% ±3.3 pp5,591 ±663
3 Bedrooms	42.2% ±3.6 pp8,474 ±720
4 Bedrooms	16.1% ±2.4 pp3,238 ±489
5 or More Bedrooms	8.0% ±1.9 pp1,607 ±381
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Studio	1.3%±0.9 pp254±178	7.5%±0.3 pp95,749±3,205	▼ -6.2%	47/50
1 Bedroom	4.6%±1.1 pp933±225	20.1%±0.4 pp257,271±4,939	▼ -15.5%	50/50
2 Bedrooms	27.8%±3.3 pp5,591±663	33.1%±0.3 pp422,866±4,221	▼ -5.3%	44/50
3 Bedrooms	42.2%±3.6 pp8,474±720	26.1%±0.3 pp333,682±4,061	▲ +16.0%	5/50
4 Bedrooms	16.1%±2.4 pp3,238±489	9.0%±0.2 pp115,453±2,426	▲ +7.1%	6/50
5 or More Bedrooms	8.0%±1.9 pp1,607±381	4.1%±0.2 pp52,033±2,072	▲ +3.9%	6/50
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 13
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	2.9% ±1.3 pp2.9%±1.3 pp568 ±245
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	2.1% ±0.9 pp71.3%±43.3 pp405 ±173
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	0.8% ±0.9 pp28.7%±28.0 pp163 ±174
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	2.9%±1.3 pp2.9%±1.3 pp568±245	3.4%±0.2 pp3.4%±0.2 pp39,979±1,996	▼ -0.5%▼ -0.5%	30/50
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	2.1%±0.9 pp71.3%±43.3 pp405±173	2.0%±0.1 pp58.2%±2.3 pp23,276±1,493	▲ +0.1%▲ +13.1%	24/5016/50
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	0.8%±0.9 pp28.7%±28.0 pp163±174	1.4%±0.1 pp41.8%±2.6 pp16,703±1,328	▼ -0.6%▼ -13.1%	36/5035/50
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category	Ward 13
Natural Gas Heat	91.4% ±1.8 pp17,608 ±354
Electric Heat	6.1% ±1.5 pp1,171 ±292
Other Heating Source	2.5% ±1.4 pp483 ±265
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Natural Gas Heat	91.4%±1.8 pp17,608±354	77.5%±0.3 pp899,660±3,501	▲ +13.9%	3/50
Electric Heat	6.1%±1.5 pp1,171±292	18.0%±0.3 pp208,937±3,864	▼ -11.9%	47/50
Other Heating Source	2.5%±1.4 pp483±265	4.4%±0.2 pp51,603±2,173	▼ -1.9%	43/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show

Category	Ward 13
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	49.8% ±3.0 pp9,592 ±575
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	19.5% ±2.9 pp3,762 ±550
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	30.7% ±3.8 pp5,907 ±725
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	14.1% ±2.7 pp2,720 ±526
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	27.2% ±7.2 pp1,120 ±297
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	12.8% ±4.2 pp527 ±171
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	60.0% ±10.8 pp2,471 ±445
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	26.5% ±9.2 pp1,092 ±377
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	56.1% ±3.4 pp8,286 ±498
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	21.4% ±3.5 pp3,163 ±514
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	22.5% ±3.1 pp3,328 ±455
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	10.7% ±2.2 pp1,581 ±326
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	44.5% ±4.6 pp3,722 ±383
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	28.1% ±5.1 pp2,344 ±426
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	27.4% ±4.2 pp2,290 ±350
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	11.3% ±2.8 pp948 ±231
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage and a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	71.1% ±4.5 pp4,564 ±286
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	12.8% ±4.3 pp819 ±275
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	16.2% ±4.4 pp1,038 ±284
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	9.9% ±3.6 pp633 ±230
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage and with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	49.8%±3.0 pp9,592±575	24.9%±0.4 pp289,047±4,524	▲ +24.9%	3/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	19.5%±2.9 pp3,762±550	23.8%±0.4 pp276,514±4,291	▼ -4.3%	36/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	30.7%±3.8 pp5,907±725	45.6%±0.5 pp529,378±5,291	▼ -15.0%	44/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	14.1%±2.7 pp2,720±526	24.0%±0.4 pp278,684±4,167	▼ -9.9%	44/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	27.2%±7.2 pp1,120±297	26.4%±0.5 pp155,936±3,134	▲ +0.8%	24/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	12.8%±4.2 pp527±171	25.3%±0.5 pp149,215±2,939	▼ -12.5%	50/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	60.0%±10.8 pp2,471±445	48.3%±0.7 pp285,567±4,222	▲ +11.7%	9/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	26.5%±9.2 pp1,092±377	25.5%±0.6 pp150,346±3,554	▲ +1.1%	23/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	56.1%±3.4 pp8,286±498	51.6%±0.6 pp272,277±2,904	▲ +4.5%	11/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	21.4%±3.5 pp3,163±514	19.6%±0.5 pp103,661±2,759	▲ +1.8%	16/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	22.5%±3.1 pp3,328±455	28.8%±0.6 pp151,994±3,034	▼ -6.3%	46/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	10.7%±2.2 pp1,581±326	13.8%±0.4 pp73,053±2,233	▼ -3.1%	43/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	44.5%±4.6 pp3,722±383	42.8%±0.7 pp146,216±2,365	▲ +1.8%	15/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	28.1%±5.1 pp2,344±426	23.9%±0.7 pp81,659±2,408	▲ +4.2%	9/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	27.4%±4.2 pp2,290±350	33.3%±0.8 pp113,882±2,596	▼ -5.9%	42/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	11.3%±2.8 pp948±231	15.4%±0.5 pp52,632±1,873	▼ -4.1%	43/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage and a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	71.1%±4.5 pp4,564±286	67.7%±0.9 pp126,058±1,613	▲ +3.4%	11/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	12.8%±4.3 pp819±275	11.8%±0.7 pp22,000±1,275	▲ +0.9%	21/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	16.2%±4.4 pp1,038±284	20.5%±0.8 pp38,106±1,492	▼ -4.3%	40/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	9.9%±3.6 pp633±230	11.0%±0.6 pp20,421±1,202	▼ -1.1%	30/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage and with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category	Ward 13
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$577±$38
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$818±$42
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$1,288±$59
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,854±$60
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$2,406±$109
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$577±$38	$594±$11	▼ −$18	26/50
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$818±$42	$1,011±$8	▼ −$193	36/50
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$1,288±$59	$1,560±$10	▼ −$272	34/50
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,854±$60	$2,329±$13	▼ −$476	33/50
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$2,406±$109	Over $3,000	▼ −$594+	33/50
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$558 ±30	$606 ±27	$577 ±38	▲ +$18▼ −$30▲ +$48
Chicago citywide	$609 ±7	$606 ±7	$594 ±11	▼ −$15▼ −$12▼ −$2
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$421 ±22	$494 ±22	$577 ±38	▲ +$155▲ +$82▲ +$73
Chicago citywide	$459 ±6	$494 ±6	$594 ±11	▲ +$135▲ +$100▲ +$35
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$877 ±46	$857 ±35	$818 ±42	▼ −$59▼ −$40▼ −$20
Chicago citywide	$992 ±5	$1,001 ±5	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$19▲ +$10▲ +$9
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$662 ±34	$699 ±29	$818 ±42	▲ +$156▲ +$119▲ +$37
Chicago citywide	$748 ±3	$816 ±4	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$262▲ +$195▲ +$67
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,484 ±64	$1,366 ±60	$1,288 ±59	▼ −$195▼ −$78▼ −$118
Chicago citywide	$1,493 ±8	$1,523 ±6	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$67▲ +$37▲ +$29
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,120 ±48	$1,113 ±49	$1,288 ±59	▲ +$169▲ +$175▼ −$6
Chicago citywide	$1,127 ±6	$1,241 ±5	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$433▲ +$319▲ +$114
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,260 ±59	$2,073 ±59	$1,854 ±60	▼ −$406▼ −$219▼ −$187
Chicago citywide	$2,333 ±12	$2,326 ±10	$2,329 ±13	▼ −$4▲ +$3▼ −$7
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,705 ±44	$1,689 ±48	$1,854 ±60	▲ +$149▲ +$164▼ −$16
Chicago citywide	$1,761 ±9	$1,896 ±8	$2,329 ±13	▲ +$569▲ +$434▲ +$135
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$2,645 ±94	$2,406 ±109	—▼ −$240—
Chicago citywide	—	$3,316 ±20	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$2,156 ±76	$2,406 ±109	—▲ +$250—
Chicago citywide	—	$2,703 ±16	—	———

Rent

Rent measure

Category	Ward 13
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$1,396±$160
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$910±$85
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,078±$56
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$1,308±$84
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,656±$168
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,989±$394
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$1,396±$160	$1,613±$12	▼ −$216	26/50
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$910±$85	$696±$20	▲ +$214	16/50
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,078±$56	$1,043±$8	▲ +$36	19/50
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$1,308±$84	$1,440±$10	▼ −$132	29/50
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,656±$168	$2,021±$21	▼ −$365	32/50
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,989±$394	$2,738±$29	▼ −$749	32/50
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13
Average Rent	$1,215±$127
10th Percentile Rent	$820±$102
25th Percentile Rent	$948±$46
Median Rent	$1,146±$83
75th Percentile Rent	$1,455±$178
90th Percentile Rent	$1,940±$282
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent	$1,215±$127	$1,452±$11	▼ −$237	28/50
10th Percentile Rent	$820±$102	$564±$21	▲ +$256	14/50
25th Percentile Rent	$948±$46	$913±$7	▲ +$35	23/50
Median Rent	$1,146±$83	$1,262±$12	▼ −$116	28/50
75th Percentile Rent	$1,455±$178	$1,868±$13	▼ −$413	31/50
90th Percentile Rent	$1,940±$282	$2,528±$38	▼ −$588	25/50
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category	Ward 13
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,927±$43
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,069±$110
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,510±$76
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,842±$55
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,289±$81
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,822±$176
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,927±$43	$2,734±$24	▼ −$807	39/50
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,069±$110	$1,270±$14	▼ −$201	39/50
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,510±$76	$1,697±$14	▼ −$187	35/50
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,842±$55	$2,339±$17	▼ −$497	38/50
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,289±$81	$3,269±$31	▼ −$980	39/50
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,822±$176	Over $4,000	▼ −$1,178+	37/50
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,250 ±43	$2,143 ±71	$1,927 ±43	▼ −$324▼ −$216▼ −$107
Chicago citywide	$2,855 ±19	$2,793 ±23	$2,734 ±24	▼ −$121▼ −$60▼ −$61
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,698 ±33	$1,746 ±58	$1,927 ±43	▲ +$228▲ +$180▲ +$48
Chicago citywide	$2,154 ±14	$2,277 ±19	$2,734 ±24	▲ +$579▲ +$457▲ +$122
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,259 ±80	$1,316 ±57	$1,069 ±110	▼ −$191▼ −$247▲ +$56
Chicago citywide	$1,403 ±11	$1,356 ±11	$1,270 ±14	▼ −$133▼ −$86▼ −$47
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$950 ±61	$1,072 ±46	$1,069 ±110	▲ +$118▼ −$3▲ +$122
Chicago citywide	$1,059 ±8	$1,105 ±9	$1,270 ±14	▲ +$212▲ +$165▲ +$46
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,716 ±60	$1,674 ±69	$1,510 ±76	▼ −$206▼ −$164▼ −$42
Chicago citywide	$1,874 ±12	$1,800 ±12	$1,697 ±14	▼ −$177▼ −$103▼ −$74
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,295 ±45	$1,364 ±56	$1,510 ±76	▲ +$215▲ +$146▲ +$69
Chicago citywide	$1,414 ±9	$1,467 ±10	$1,697 ±14	▲ +$283▲ +$230▲ +$53
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,201 ±56	$2,105 ±50	$1,842 ±55	▼ −$358▼ −$263▼ −$95
Chicago citywide	$2,526 ±13	$2,422 ±13	$2,339 ±17	▼ −$187▼ −$83▼ −$103
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,661 ±42	$1,716 ±41	$1,842 ±55	▲ +$182▲ +$126▲ +$55
Chicago citywide	$1,906 ±10	$1,974 ±11	$2,339 ±17	▲ +$433▲ +$365▲ +$68
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,704 ±90	$2,531 ±93	$2,289 ±81	▼ −$415▼ −$242▼ −$173
Chicago citywide	$3,447 ±25	$3,343 ±25	$3,269 ±31	▼ −$178▼ −$74▼ −$104
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$2,041 ±68	$2,063 ±76	$2,289 ±81	▲ +$248▲ +$226▲ +$22
Chicago citywide	$2,601 ±19	$2,724 ±20	$3,269 ±31	▲ +$668▲ +$544▲ +$123
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$3,267 ±99	$2,999 ±76	$2,822 ±176	▼ −$445▼ −$177▼ −$268
Chicago citywide	—	$4,578 ±59	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$2,466 ±75	$2,444 ±62	$2,822 ±176	▲ +$356▲ +$378▼ −$22
Chicago citywide	—	$3,731 ±48	—	———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category	Ward 13
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$746±$37
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$419±$51
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$582±$34
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$740±$30
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$917±$48
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,062±$40
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$746±$37	$1,078±$22	▼ −$331	39/50
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$419±$51	$418±$8	▲ +$1	31/50
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$582±$34	$601±$8	▼ −$19	28/50
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$740±$30	$859±$10	▼ −$119	34/50
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$917±$48	$1,197±$18	▼ −$280	37/50
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,062±$40	Over $1,500	▼ −$438+	45/50
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$674 ±27	$748 ±29	$746 ±37	▲ +$72▼ −$2▲ +$74
Chicago citywide	$957 ±15	$1,028 ±10	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$121▲ +$50▲ +$71
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$509 ±21	$609 ±23	$746 ±37	▲ +$237▲ +$137▲ +$101
Chicago citywide	$722 ±11	$838 ±8	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$355▲ +$240▲ +$116
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$394 ±30	$458 ±40	$419 ±51	▲ +$25▼ −$38▲ +$63
Chicago citywide	$429 ±6	$469 ±7	$418 ±8	▼ −$11▼ −$51▲ +$40
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$297 ±22	$373 ±32	$419 ±51	▲ +$122▲ +$46▲ +$76
Chicago citywide	$324 ±5	$382 ±5	$418 ±8	▲ +$95▲ +$36▲ +$59
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$503 ±28	$578 ±25	$582 ±34	▲ +$79▲ +$3▲ +$76
Chicago citywide	$586 ±6	$629 ±6	$601 ±8	▲ +$14▼ −$28▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$379 ±21	$471 ±20	$582 ±34	▲ +$202▲ +$110▲ +$92
Chicago citywide	$442 ±4	$513 ±5	$601 ±8	▲ +$158▲ +$88▲ +$70
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$650 ±25	$727 ±23	$740 ±30	▲ +$90▲ +$13▲ +$77
Chicago citywide	$815 ±9	$860 ±7	$859 ±10	▲ +$44▼ −$1▲ +$45
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$491 ±19	$592 ±19	$740 ±30	▲ +$249▲ +$148▲ +$102
Chicago citywide	$615 ±7	$701 ±6	$859 ±10	▲ +$244▲ +$158▲ +$86
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$793 ±32	$860 ±32	$917 ±48	▲ +$124▲ +$57▲ +$67
Chicago citywide	—	$1,206 ±14	$1,197 ±18	—▼ −$9—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$599 ±25	$701 ±26	$917 ±48	▲ +$319▲ +$217▲ +$102
Chicago citywide	—	$983 ±12	$1,197 ±18	—▲ +$214—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$1,048 ±60	$1,062 ±40	—▲ +$14—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,767 ±35	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$854 ±49	$1,062 ±40	—▲ +$208—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,440 ±28	—	———

Home Values

Category	Ward 13
Average Home Value	$291,718±$7,329
10th Percentile Home Value	$167,523±$17,955
25th Percentile Home Value	$237,988±$10,830
Median Home Value	$294,387±$7,035
75th Percentile Home Value	$360,710±$6,391
90th Percentile Home Value	$407,379±$17,554
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Average Home Value	$291,718±$7,329	$437,638±$7,358	▼ −$145,920	35/50
10th Percentile Home Value	$167,523±$17,955	$129,150±$3,756	▲ +$38,373	22/50
25th Percentile Home Value	$237,988±$10,830	$217,800±$1,804	▲ +$20,188	24/50
Median Home Value	$294,387±$7,035	$334,100±$2,424	▼ −$39,713	29/50
75th Percentile Home Value	$360,710±$6,391	$497,700±$3,730	▼ −$136,990	35/50
90th Percentile Home Value	$407,379±$17,554	$809,159±$15,691	▼ −$401,780	38/50
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$250,978 ±4,301	$263,308 ±7,679	$291,718 ±7,329	▲ +$40,740▲ +$28,410▲ +$12,330
Chicago citywide	$386,614 ±5,106	$424,380 ±4,754	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$51,024▲ +$13,258▲ +$37,766
Average Home Value (nominal dollars)	$189,409 ±3,246	$214,597 ±6,259	$291,718 ±7,329	▲ +$102,309▲ +$77,121▲ +$25,188
Chicago citywide	$291,771 ±3,853	$345,871 ±3,874	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$145,867▲ +$91,768▲ +$54,099
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$132,170 ±9,120	$148,878 ±11,327	$167,523 ±17,955	▲ +$35,353▲ +$18,646▲ +$16,707
Chicago citywide	$115,330 ±1,421	$124,313 ±1,339	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$13,821▲ +$4,838▲ +$8,983
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$99,747 ±6,883	$121,336 ±9,231	$167,523 ±17,955	▲ +$67,777▲ +$46,188▲ +$21,589
Chicago citywide	$87,037 ±1,072	$101,315 ±1,091	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$42,113▲ +$27,835▲ +$14,278
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$198,926 ±7,639	$205,209 ±6,005	$237,988 ±10,830	▲ +$39,062▲ +$32,778▲ +$6,284
Chicago citywide	$190,543 ±2,400	$199,018 ±1,255	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$27,257▲ +$18,782▲ +$8,475
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$150,126 ±5,765	$167,246 ±4,894	$237,988 ±10,830	▲ +$87,862▲ +$70,742▲ +$17,120
Chicago citywide	$143,800 ±1,811	$162,200 ±1,023	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$74,000▲ +$55,600▲ +$18,400
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$254,055 ±7,052	$260,230 ±5,957	$294,387 ±7,035	▲ +$40,332▲ +$34,157▲ +$6,175
Chicago citywide	$299,066 ±2,120	$316,564 ±2,118	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$35,034▲ +$17,536▲ +$17,498
Median Home Value (nominal dollars)	$191,731 ±5,322	$212,088 ±4,855	$294,387 ±7,035	▲ +$102,656▲ +$82,299▲ +$20,356
Chicago citywide	$225,700 ±1,600	$258,000 ±1,726	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$108,400▲ +$76,100▲ +$32,300
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$321,432 ±5,857	$323,294 ±7,195	$360,710 ±6,391	▲ +$39,278▲ +$37,416▲ +$1,861
Chicago citywide	$466,951 ±3,138	$490,797 ±3,892	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$30,749▲ +$6,903▲ +$23,846
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$242,580 ±4,420	$263,485 ±5,864	$360,710 ±6,391	▲ +$118,130▲ +$97,225▲ +$20,905
Chicago citywide	$352,400 ±2,368	$400,000 ±3,172	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$145,300▲ +$97,700▲ +$47,600
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$394,024 ±14,942	$379,182 ±19,349	$407,379 ±17,554	▲ +$13,355▲ +$28,197▼ −$14,842
Chicago citywide	$739,174 ±12,945	$835,769 ±9,047	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$69,986▼ −$26,610▲ +$96,595
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$297,364 ±11,276	$309,034 ±15,769	$407,379 ±17,554	▲ +$110,015▲ +$98,345▲ +$11,670
Chicago citywide	$557,842 ±9,770	$681,153 ±7,373	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$251,317▲ +$128,006▲ +$123,311

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 13
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	1.5%1.5%298
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	1.5%99.3%296
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.0%0.7%2
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.0%0.0%0
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.0%0.0%0
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	1.5%1.5%298	8.3%8.3%106,578	▼ -6.9%▼ -6.9%	43/50
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	1.5%99.3%296	4.8%57.2%60,910	▼ -3.3%▲ +42.2%	34/501/50
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.0%0.7%2	1.1%13.8%14,721	▼ -1.1%▼ -13.1%	50/5047/50
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.0%0.0%0	2.1%25.7%27,383	▼ -2.1%▼ -25.7%	44/5044/50
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.0%0.0%0	0.3%3.3%3,564	▼ -0.3%▼ -3.3%	38/5038/50
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units	0.8%145	0.9%181	1.5%298	▲ +0.7 pp▲ +153▲ +0.5 pp▲ +117▲ +0.2 pp▲ +36
Chicago citywide	8.8%104,550	8.5%103,479	8.3%106,578	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,028▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,099▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,071
Housing Choice Vouchers	0.8%145	0.9%179	1.5%296	▲ +0.7 pp▲ +151▲ +0.5 pp▲ +117▲ +0.2 pp▲ +34
Chicago citywide	4.3%51,601	4.6%55,987	4.8%60,910	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +9,309▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,923▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,386
Public Housing	0.0%0	0.0%2	0.0%2	– 0.0 pp▲ +2– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▲ +2
Chicago citywide	1.8%21,159	1.3%16,094	1.2%14,721	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −6,438▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,373▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,065
Project-Based Section 8	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	2.2%25,940	2.2%26,951	2.1%27,383	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,443▼ −0.1 pp▲ +432– 0.0 pp▲ +1,011
Other Project-Based Programs	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,850	0.4%4,447	0.3%3,564	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,286▼ −0.1 pp▼ −883▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,403

Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category	Ward 13
Average Household Income	$20,820
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$516
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,275
Below 30% of Area Median Income	75.0%191
With Children	51.1%130
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	32.5%83
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this ward. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this ward. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this ward.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$20,820	$17,032	▲ +$3,788	3/50
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$516	$425	▲ +$92	5/50
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,275	$1,389	▼ -$114	42/50
Below 30% of Area Median Income	75.0%191	83.0%77,427	▼ -8.0 pp	48/50
With Children	51.1%130	31.0%28,919	▲ +20.1 pp	4/50
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	32.5%83	32.0%29,852	▲ +0.5 pp	26/50
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this ward. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this ward. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this ward.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income	$13,049	$16,581	$20,820	▲ +$7,771▲ +$4,238▲ +$3,533
Chicago citywide	$12,156	$13,665	$17,032	▲ +$4,876▲ +$3,367▲ +$1,509
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$371	$406	$516	▲ +$145▲ +$110▲ +$35
Chicago citywide	$310	$340	$425	▲ +$115▲ +$85▲ +$30
Average Monthly Government Spending	$850	$887	$1,275	▲ +$425▲ +$388▲ +$37
Chicago citywide	$916	$1,017	$1,389	▲ +$473▲ +$372▲ +$101
Below 30% of Area Median Income	78.8%—	75.7%—	75.0%—	▼ −3.8 pp—▼ −0.6 pp—▼ −3.2 pp—
Chicago citywide	80.0%—	81.0%—	83.0%—	▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +2.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children	—	—	51.1%—	——————
Chicago citywide	—	—	31.0%—	——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	39.0%—	32.2%—	32.5%—	▼ −6.5 pp—▲ +0.3 pp—▼ −6.8 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category	Ward 13
Total Tree Canopy	8.4%287 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	69.9%2,379 acres
Natural Open Surfaces	21.7%738 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Total Tree Canopy	8.4%287 acres	18.4%25,934 acres	▼ -9.9%	50/50
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	69.9%2,379 acres	60.2%84,955 acres	▲ +9.7%	20/50
Natural Open Surfaces	21.7%738 acres	21.5%30,331 acres	▲ +0.2%	14/50
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category	Ward 13
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	26.8% ±3.8 pp14,082 ±2,025
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	48.3% ±4.4 pp25,397 ±2,300
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	25.0% ±3.9 pp13,133 ±2,041
Homes Without Air Conditioning	1.1%575
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	26.8%±3.8 pp14,082±2,025	26.1%±0.5 pp708,175±13,883	▲ +0.6%	21/50
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	48.3%±4.4 pp25,397±2,300	44.1%±0.6 pp1,195,501±15,477	▲ +4.2%	8/50
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	25.0%±3.9 pp13,133±2,041	29.8%±0.5 pp807,550±13,776	▼ -4.8%	38/50
Homes Without Air Conditioning	1.1%575	4.2%114,618	▼ -3.1%	49/50
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category	Ward 13
Drove Alone	74.9% ±3.9 pp16,040 ±829
Carpooled	11.8% ±2.4 pp2,520 ±509
Public Transit	10.4% ±1.9 pp2,228 ±406
Walked	1.0% ±0.6 pp205 ±127
Bikes	0.2% ±0.4 pp39 ±80
Other Commute Mode	1.2% ±0.7 pp257 ±148
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Drove Alone	74.9%±3.9 pp16,040±829	56.6%±0.4 pp772,696±5,998	▲ +18.3%	4/50
Carpooled	11.8%±2.4 pp2,520±509	9.3%±0.3 pp126,918±3,980	▲ +2.5%	13/50
Public Transit	10.4%±1.9 pp2,228±406	22.4%±0.4 pp305,691±6,011	▼ -12.0%	47/50
Walked	1.0%±0.6 pp205±127	7.3%±0.3 pp100,269±3,456	▼ -6.4%	49/50
Bikes	0.2%±0.4 pp39±80	1.8%±0.1 pp24,441±1,693	▼ -1.6%	40/50
Other Commute Mode	1.2%±0.7 pp257±148	2.5%±0.1 pp34,356±1,772	▼ -1.3%	31/50
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category	Ward 13
Average Commute Time (minutes)	34 min±1.1 min
Less Than 15 Minutes	12.4% ±2.0 pp2,644 ±433
15–29 Minutes	28.1% ±3.2 pp6,010 ±680
30–44 Minutes	30.0% ±3.8 pp6,411 ±804
45–59 Minutes	14.8% ±1.9 pp3,152 ±403
60 Minutes or More	14.7% ±2.5 pp3,149 ±529
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes)	34 min±1.1 min	33 min±0.2 min	▲ +1 min	28/50
Less Than 15 Minutes	12.4%±2.0 pp2,644±433	13.0%±0.3 pp140,252±3,438	▼ -0.6%	20/50
15–29 Minutes	28.1%±3.2 pp6,010±680	29.9%±0.5 pp322,586±5,056	▼ -1.8%	23/50
30–44 Minutes	30.0%±3.8 pp6,411±804	29.6%±0.4 pp318,782±4,584	▲ +0.4%	24/50
45–59 Minutes	14.8%±1.9 pp3,152±403	14.0%±0.3 pp151,451±3,075	▲ +0.7%	26/50
60 Minutes or More	14.7%±2.5 pp3,149±529	13.4%±0.3 pp144,940±3,715	▲ +1.3%	19/50
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category	Ward 13
Average Vehicles per Household	1.70±0.11
Households With No Vehicle	8.3% ±2.3 pp1,607 ±442
Households With 1 Vehicle	37.5% ±3.1 pp7,228 ±601
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	54.1% ±4.1 pp10,426 ±790
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Average Vehicles per Household	1.70±0.11	1.12±0.01	▲ +0.58	3/50
Households With No Vehicle	8.3%±2.3 pp1,607±442	26.6%±0.4 pp308,497±5,087	▼ -18.2%	47/50
Households With 1 Vehicle	37.5%±3.1 pp7,228±601	45.2%±0.4 pp524,900±5,145	▼ -7.7%	46/50
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	54.1%±4.1 pp10,426±790	28.2%±0.4 pp326,808±4,200	▲ +26.0%	4/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Ward 13 Residents Work

Category	Ward 13
Loop	21.7%5,280
Near North Side	5.1%1,247
Near West Side	5.1%1,242
Garfield Ridge	2.8%671
Lower West Side	1.7%420
All other city neighborhoods	21.0%5,102
Outside the city	42.5%10,317
↳ Bedford Park village, IL	2.2%534
↳ Cicero town, IL	1.2%301
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL	1.0%244
↳ Oak Brook village, IL	1.0%241
↳ Bridgeview village, IL	0.9%221
↳ All other Illinois locations	34.2%8,306
Out of state	1.9%470
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for ward 13 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference
Loop	21.7%5,280	21.5%259,168	▲ +0.2%
Near North Side	5.1%1,247	9.1%109,334	▼ -3.9%
Near West Side	5.1%1,242	6.7%80,119	▼ -1.5%
Garfield Ridge	2.8%671	0.6%6,744	▲ +2.2%
Lower West Side	1.7%420	1.0%12,477	▲ +0.7%
All other city neighborhoods	21.0%5,102	21.1%253,663	0%
Outside the city	42.5%10,317	35.9%432,365	▲ +6.6%
↳ Bedford Park village, IL	2.2%534	0.6%6,897	▲ +1.6%
↳ Cicero town, IL	1.2%301	0.5%6,087	▲ +0.7%
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL	1.0%244	0.4%5,394	▲ +0.6%
↳ Oak Brook village, IL	1.0%241	0.7%8,055	▲ +0.3%
↳ Bridgeview village, IL	0.9%221	0.3%3,024	▲ +0.7%
↳ All other Illinois locations	34.2%8,306	27.4%330,297	▲ +6.8%
Out of state	1.9%470	2.2%26,136	▼ -0.2%
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for ward 13 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Loop	21.0%4,871	20.8%5,063	21.7%5,280	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +409▲ +0.9 pp▲ +217▼ −0.1 pp▲ +192
Chicago citywide	20.0%224,635	21.0%252,791	21.5%259,168	▲ +1.5 pp▲ +34,533▲ +0.5 pp▲ +6,377▲ +1.0 pp▲ +28,156
Near North Side	4.5%1,043	5.2%1,274	5.1%1,247	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +204▼ −0.1 pp▼ −27▲ +0.8 pp▲ +231
Chicago citywide	8.2%92,142	9.4%112,858	9.1%109,334	▲ +0.9 pp▲ +17,192▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3,524▲ +1.2 pp▲ +20,716
Near West Side	4.4%1,016	5.4%1,311	5.1%1,242	▲ +0.7 pp▲ +226▼ −0.3 pp▼ −69▲ +1.0 pp▲ +295
Chicago citywide	6.2%69,083	6.6%79,757	6.7%80,119	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +11,036– 0.0 pp▲ +362▲ +0.5 pp▲ +10,674
Garfield Ridge	2.4%566	2.8%668	2.8%671	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +105– 0.0 pp▲ +3▲ +0.3 pp▲ +102
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,382	0.6%7,083	0.6%6,744	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,362– 0.0 pp▼ −339▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,701
Lower West Side	1.4%335	1.4%328	1.7%420	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +85▲ +0.4 pp▲ +92▼ −0.1 pp▼ −7
Chicago citywide	0.9%9,585	0.8%9,912	1.0%12,477	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,892▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,565– 0.0 pp▲ +327
All other city neighborhoods	22.3%5,185	21.2%5,138	21.0%5,102	▼ −1.3 pp▼ −83▼ −0.1 pp▼ −36▼ −1.2 pp▼ −47
Chicago citywide	22.9%257,015	21.5%259,132	21.1%253,663	▼ −1.8 pp▼ −3,352▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,469▼ −1.4 pp▲ +2,117
Outside the city	43.9%10,203	43.1%10,476	42.5%10,317	▼ −1.4 pp▲ +114▼ −0.6 pp▼ −159▼ −0.8 pp▲ +273
Chicago citywide	36.8%412,807	35.7%430,135	35.9%432,365	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +19,558▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,230▼ −1.0 pp▲ +17,328
Bedford Park village, IL	2.7%621	2.4%591	2.2%534	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −87▼ −0.2 pp▼ −57▼ −0.2 pp▼ −30
Chicago citywide	0.8%8,547	0.7%8,008	0.6%6,897	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,650▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,111▼ −0.1 pp▼ −539
Cicero town, IL	1.1%246	1.3%313	1.2%301	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +55– 0.0 pp▼ −12▲ +0.2 pp▲ +67
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,256	0.5%6,120	0.5%6,087	– 0.0 pp▲ +831– 0.0 pp▼ −33– 0.0 pp▲ +864
Oak Lawn village, IL	1.1%266	1.2%287	1.0%244	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −22▼ −0.2 pp▼ −43– 0.0 pp▲ +21
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,230	0.5%5,563	0.4%5,394	– 0.0 pp▲ +164– 0.0 pp▼ −169– 0.0 pp▲ +333
Oak Brook village, IL	0.9%212	0.9%217	1.0%241	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +29▲ +0.1 pp▲ +24– 0.0 pp▲ +5
Chicago citywide	0.7%7,408	0.6%7,560	0.7%8,055	– 0.0 pp▲ +647– 0.0 pp▲ +495– 0.0 pp▲ +152
Bridgeview village, IL	1.1%252	1.1%272	0.9%221	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −31▼ −0.2 pp▼ −51– 0.0 pp▲ +20
Chicago citywide	0.3%3,113	0.3%3,251	0.3%3,024	– 0.0 pp▼ −89– 0.0 pp▼ −227– 0.0 pp▲ +138
All other Illinois locations	34.9%8,116	34.1%8,280	34.2%8,306	▼ −0.7 pp▲ +190▲ +0.1 pp▲ +26▼ −0.8 pp▲ +164
Chicago citywide	28.0%314,112	27.1%326,235	27.4%330,297	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +16,185▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,062▼ −0.9 pp▲ +12,123
Out of state	2.1%490	2.1%516	1.9%470	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −20▼ −0.2 pp▼ −46– 0.0 pp▲ +26
Chicago citywide	2.2%24,577	2.3%27,198	2.2%26,136	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,559▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,062▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,621

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Ward 13

Category	Ward 13
Clearing	3.1%419
Garfield Ridge	3.0%396
West Lawn	2.7%363
Ashburn	1.8%245
Chicago Lawn	1.7%227
All other city neighborhoods	27.8%3,706
Outside the city	59.8%7,981
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL	2.0%267
↳ Joliet city, IL	1.2%161
↳ Burbank city, IL	1.2%156
↳ Orland Park village, IL	1.1%152
↳ Cicero town, IL	1.0%134
↳ All other Illinois locations	40.0%5,335
Out of state	13.3%1,776
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in ward 13; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference
Clearing	3.1%419	0.4%6,385	▲ +2.7%
Garfield Ridge	3.0%396	0.7%9,999	▲ +2.3%
West Lawn	2.7%363	0.5%7,352	▲ +2.2%
Ashburn	1.8%245	0.7%10,392	▲ +1.1%
Chicago Lawn	1.7%227	0.7%10,607	▲ +1.0%
All other city neighborhoods	27.8%3,706	37.1%542,952	▼ -9.3%
Outside the city	59.8%7,981	47.2%691,556	▲ +12.6%
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL	2.0%267	0.7%9,767	▲ +1.3%
↳ Joliet city, IL	1.2%161	0.6%9,068	▲ +0.6%
↳ Burbank city, IL	1.2%156	0.3%4,444	▲ +0.9%
↳ Orland Park village, IL	1.1%152	0.4%6,467	▲ +0.7%
↳ Cicero town, IL	1.0%134	0.8%10,993	▲ +0.3%
↳ All other Illinois locations	40.0%5,335	37.0%540,957	▲ +3.0%
Out of state	13.3%1,776	4.9%72,124	▲ +8.4%
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in ward 13; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Clearing	3.5%411	3.3%423	3.1%419	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +8▼ −0.2 pp▼ −4▼ −0.2 pp▲ +12
Chicago citywide	0.5%6,028	0.5%6,464	0.4%6,385	– 0.0 pp▲ +357– 0.0 pp▼ −79– 0.0 pp▲ +436
Garfield Ridge	3.1%367	2.7%343	3.0%396	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +29▲ +0.3 pp▲ +53▼ −0.4 pp▼ −24
Chicago citywide	0.7%9,227	0.7%9,417	0.7%9,999	– 0.0 pp▲ +772– 0.0 pp▲ +582– 0.0 pp▲ +190
West Lawn	2.1%245	2.3%300	2.7%363	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +118▲ +0.4 pp▲ +63▲ +0.3 pp▲ +55
Chicago citywide	0.5%6,893	0.5%7,619	0.5%7,352	– 0.0 pp▲ +459– 0.0 pp▼ −267– 0.0 pp▲ +726
Ashburn	1.5%181	1.6%208	1.8%245	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +64▲ +0.2 pp▲ +37▲ +0.1 pp▲ +27
Chicago citywide	0.8%10,132	0.7%10,418	0.7%10,392	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +260– 0.0 pp▼ −26– 0.0 pp▲ +286
Chicago Lawn	1.5%173	2.1%265	1.7%227	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +54▼ −0.4 pp▼ −38▲ +0.6 pp▲ +92
Chicago citywide	0.7%9,855	0.8%10,666	0.7%10,607	– 0.0 pp▲ +752– 0.0 pp▼ −59– 0.0 pp▲ +811
All other city neighborhoods	28.5%3,341	27.5%3,512	27.8%3,706	▼ −0.8 pp▲ +365▲ +0.3 pp▲ +194▼ −1.0 pp▲ +171
Chicago citywide	38.3%503,539	38.2%541,560	37.1%542,952	▼ −1.2 pp▲ +39,413▼ −1.1 pp▲ +1,392▼ −0.1 pp▲ +38,021
Outside the city	59.7%6,985	60.4%7,716	59.8%7,981	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +996▼ −0.6 pp▲ +265▲ +0.8 pp▲ +731
Chicago citywide	45.9%603,753	45.4%642,891	47.2%691,556	▲ +1.3 pp▲ +87,803▲ +1.9 pp▲ +48,665▼ −0.6 pp▲ +39,138
Oak Lawn village, IL	2.4%276	2.3%299	2.0%267	▼ −0.4 pp▼ −9▼ −0.3 pp▼ −32– 0.0 pp▲ +23
Chicago citywide	0.7%9,277	0.7%9,503	0.7%9,767	– 0.0 pp▲ +490– 0.0 pp▲ +264– 0.0 pp▲ +226
Joliet city, IL	1.2%139	1.1%139	1.2%161	– 0.0 pp▲ +22▲ +0.1 pp▲ +22▼ −0.1 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.6%7,328	0.6%8,297	0.6%9,068	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,740– 0.0 pp▲ +771– 0.0 pp▲ +969
Burbank city, IL	1.4%161	1.4%180	1.2%156	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −5▼ −0.2 pp▼ −24– 0.0 pp▲ +19
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,103	0.3%4,109	0.3%4,444	– 0.0 pp▲ +341– 0.0 pp▲ +335– 0.0 pp▲ +6
Orland Park village, IL	1.4%161	1.2%150	1.1%152	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −9– 0.0 pp▲ +2▼ −0.2 pp▼ −11
Chicago citywide	0.4%5,430	0.4%6,262	0.4%6,467	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,037– 0.0 pp▲ +205– 0.0 pp▲ +832
Cicero town, IL	1.4%168	1.2%154	1.0%134	▼ −0.4 pp▼ −34▼ −0.2 pp▼ −20▼ −0.2 pp▼ −14
Chicago citywide	0.8%9,934	0.8%11,086	0.8%10,993	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,059– 0.0 pp▼ −93– 0.0 pp▲ +1,152
All other Illinois locations	41.2%4,817	38.5%4,914	40.0%5,335	▼ −1.2 pp▲ +518▲ +1.5 pp▲ +421▼ −2.7 pp▲ +97
Chicago citywide	35.6%467,892	35.1%497,967	37.0%540,957	▲ +1.4 pp▲ +73,065▲ +1.8 pp▲ +42,990▼ −0.5 pp▲ +30,075
Out of state	10.8%1,263	14.7%1,880	13.3%1,776	▲ +2.5 pp▲ +513▼ −1.4 pp▼ −104▲ +3.9 pp▲ +617
Chicago citywide	4.9%63,789	4.8%68,287	4.9%72,124	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8,335▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,837– 0.0 pp▲ +4,498

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category	Ward 13
No Computer or Smartphone	8.5% ±2.3 pp1,637 ±451
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	10.3% ±2.1 pp1,981 ±406
Desktop or Laptop Available	77.6% ±2.4 pp14,946 ±467
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
No Computer or Smartphone	8.5%±2.3 pp1,637±451	5.1%±0.2 pp58,709±2,246	▲ +3.4%	10/50
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	10.3%±2.1 pp1,981±406	10.4%±0.3 pp120,218±3,642	▼ -0.1%	28/50
Desktop or Laptop Available	77.6%±2.4 pp14,946±467	79.7%±0.4 pp924,956±4,919	▼ -2.1%	28/50
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category	Ward 13
Has Internet Access	91.8% ±1.2 pp17,688 ±240
Cellular Data Plan Only	14.6% ±2.3 pp2,805 ±447
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	2.0% ±0.8 pp384 ±157
No Internet Access	8.2% ±2.3 pp1,573 ±453
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Has Internet Access	91.8%±1.2 pp17,688±240	93.1%±0.3 pp1,080,419±3,310	▼ -1.3%	31/50
Cellular Data Plan Only	14.6%±2.3 pp2,805±447	12.5%±0.3 pp145,219±3,463	▲ +2.0%	19/50
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	2.0%±0.8 pp384±157	3.9%±0.2 pp45,350±1,940	▼ -1.9%	42/50
No Internet Access	8.2%±2.3 pp1,573±453	6.9%±0.2 pp79,786±2,730	▲ +1.3%	20/50
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category	Ward 13
Uninsured Residents	8.7% ±1.3 pp4,601 ±688
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	3.0% ±2.1 pp1,586 ±1,113
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	13.3% ±2.0 pp6,980 ±1,066
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	0.2% ±0.8 pp107 ±399
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Uninsured Residents	8.7%±1.3 pp4,601±688	9.8%±0.2 pp264,391±5,512	▼ -1.0%	29/50
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	3.0%±2.1 pp1,586±1,113	3.9%±0.3 pp104,687±8,689	▼ -0.8%	32/50
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	13.3%±2.0 pp6,980±1,066	13.3%±0.3 pp361,430±8,202	▼ -0.1%	27/50
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	0.2%±0.8 pp107±399	1.7%±0.3 pp46,718±7,559	▼ -1.5%	50/50
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category	Ward 13
Insured (Any Coverage)	91.3% ±1.3 pp47,984 ±688
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	55.2% ±1.9 pp29,049 ±1,017
Direct-Purchase Insurance	7.9% ±1.6 pp4,157 ±860
Medicare	13.7% ±1.3 pp7,216 ±704
Medicaid	17.4% ±2.2 pp9,158 ±1,141
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.2% ±0.4 pp104 ±185
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	4.8% ±0.9 pp2,524 ±451
Uninsured	8.7% ±1.3 pp4,599 ±688
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Insured (Any Coverage)	91.3%±1.3 pp47,984±688	90.2%±0.2 pp2,424,871±5,689	▲ +1.0%	22/50
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	55.2%±1.9 pp29,049±1,017	51.2%±0.4 pp1,376,912±9,468	▲ +4.0%	18/50
Direct-Purchase Insurance	7.9%±1.6 pp4,157±860	8.5%±0.2 pp227,424±5,112	▼ -0.6%	26/50
Medicare	13.7%±1.3 pp7,216±704	12.6%±0.2 pp339,804±4,911	▲ +1.1%	18/50
Medicaid	17.4%±2.2 pp9,158±1,141	22.2%±0.3 pp596,931±7,773	▼ -4.8%	33/50
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.2%±0.4 pp104±185	0.3%±0.0 pp7,201±787	▼ -0.1%	29/50
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	4.8%±0.9 pp2,524±451	3.8%±0.1 pp102,777±3,544	▲ +1.0%	16/50
Uninsured	8.7%±1.3 pp4,599±688	9.8%±0.2 pp262,018±5,689	▼ -1.0%	29/50
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category	Ward 13
Adults With at Least One Disability	11.5% ±1.4 pp4,641 ±562
Mobility Disability	5.6% ±0.9 pp2,264 ±344
Hearing Disability	3.6% ±0.9 pp1,460 ±378
Vision Disability	2.5% ±0.8 pp996 ±335
Cognitive Disability	3.1% ±0.7 pp1,248 ±295
Self-Care Disability	2.4% ±0.7 pp963 ±287
Independent Living Disability	5.2% ±0.9 pp2,098 ±359
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability	11.5%±1.4 pp4,641±562	14.0%±0.2 pp303,665±4,797	▼ -2.5%	36/50
Mobility Disability	5.6%±0.9 pp2,264±344	7.6%±0.2 pp163,666±3,398	▼ -1.9%	37/50
Hearing Disability	3.6%±0.9 pp1,460±378	2.8%±0.1 pp61,430±2,337	▲ +0.8%	14/50
Vision Disability	2.5%±0.8 pp996±335	3.0%±0.1 pp64,544±2,269	▼ -0.5%	29/50
Cognitive Disability	3.1%±0.7 pp1,248±295	5.2%±0.1 pp112,824±2,939	▼ -2.1%	45/50
Self-Care Disability	2.4%±0.7 pp963±287	2.7%±0.1 pp57,758±2,261	▼ -0.3%	29/50
Independent Living Disability	5.2%±0.9 pp2,098±359	5.7%±0.2 pp123,651±3,247	▼ -0.5%	27/50
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category	Ward 13
Arthritis	20.0%8,111
High Blood Pressure	27.7%11,202
Cancer	5.9%2,403
Current Asthma	9.1%3,675
Coronary Heart Disease	5.0%2,038
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	5.3%2,143
Diabetes	11.5%4,649
High Cholesterol	33.8%13,696
Obesity	32.1%13,007
Stroke	2.9%1,157
Lost All Natural Teeth	2.1%864
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Arthritis	20.0%8,111	19.6%409,178	▲ +0.4%	23/50
High Blood Pressure	27.7%11,202	29.7%620,030	▼ -2.0%	28/50
Cancer	5.9%2,403	5.0%104,382	▲ +0.9%	9/50
Current Asthma	9.1%3,675	10.2%212,940	▼ -1.1%	37/50
Coronary Heart Disease	5.0%2,038	4.8%100,207	▲ +0.2%	22/50
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	5.3%2,143	5.5%114,820	▼ -0.2%	24/50
Diabetes	11.5%4,649	12.0%250,517	▼ -0.5%	26/50
High Cholesterol	33.8%13,696	31.6%659,696	▲ +2.2%	17/50
Obesity	32.1%13,007	32.6%680,572	▼ -0.5%	28/50
Stroke	2.9%1,157	3.3%68,892	▼ -0.4%	29/50
Lost All Natural Teeth	2.1%864	2.5%52,249	▼ -0.4%	26/50
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category	Ward 13
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	19.7%7,982
Current Cigarette Smoking	11.3%4,562
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	26.4%10,700
Short Sleep Duration	35.6%14,408
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	19.7%7,982	19.0%396,652	▲ +0.7%	21/50
Current Cigarette Smoking	11.3%4,562	11.9%248,430	▼ -0.6%	30/50
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	26.4%10,700	24.7%515,648	▲ +1.7%	24/50
Short Sleep Duration	35.6%14,408	37.8%789,129	▼ -2.2%	32/50
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category	Ward 13
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	21.8%8,841
Frequent Physical Distress	12.7%5,156
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	21.8%8,841	21.1%440,493	▲ +0.7%	24/50
Frequent Physical Distress	12.7%5,156	11.8%246,342	▲ +0.9%	21/50
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category	Ward 13
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	71.4%28,926
Routine Checkup in Past Year	74.5%30,179
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	86.4%35,011
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	54.0%21,878
Dental Visit in Past Year	58.4%23,670
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	72.2%29,238
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	71.4%28,926	72.5%1,513,542	▼ -1.1%	26/50
Routine Checkup in Past Year	74.5%30,179	76.2%1,590,785	▼ -1.7%	31/50
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	86.4%35,011	86.2%1,799,549	▲ +0.2%	24/50
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	54.0%21,878	55.8%1,164,905	▼ -1.8%	31/50
Dental Visit in Past Year	58.4%23,670	58.4%1,219,184	0%	24/50
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	72.2%29,238	74.2%1,549,032	▼ -2.0%	38/50
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category	Ward 13
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	18.6%7,546
Frequent Mental Distress	15.1%6,129
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	27.3%11,062
Loneliness	34.7%14,053
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 13	City	Difference	Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	18.6%7,546	19.1%398,740	▼ -0.5%	31/50
Frequent Mental Distress	15.1%6,129	16.0%334,023	▼ -0.9%	32/50
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	27.3%11,062	28.2%588,716	▼ -0.9%	30/50
Loneliness	34.7%14,053	35.8%747,377	▼ -1.1%	33/50
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Compare All Wards

Chicago City Council Ward 13

Ward 13 at a Glance

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Age Distribution

Educational Attainment

Population

Household Size

Marital Status

Language Spoken at Home

English Proficiency

Household Composition

Children by Household Type

Veteran Status

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Poverty Status

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Occupation

Industry of Employment

Class of Worker

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Earnings of All Workers

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 13

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 13 in Lower-Income Families

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Ward 13

Local Businesses

Jobs in Ward 13

Industry of Jobs in Ward 13

Earnings of Jobs in Ward 13

Jobs in Ward 13 by Firm Age

Jobs in Ward 13 by Firm Size

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

College Enrollment

Student Digital Access

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Year Moved Into Current Home

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Housing Vacancy Status

Housing Age

Housing Units by Building Size

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Overcrowded Housing

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Monthly Housing Costs

Rent

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Home Values

Federal Housing Assistance

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Commute Time

Household Vehicle Access

Where Ward 13 Residents Work

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Ward 13

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Household Internet Access

Health

Health Insurance

Health Insurance Coverage Types