Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category	Ward 11
Hispanic	22.2% ±2.7 pp11,511 ±1,400
White	26.0% ±1.7 pp13,487 ±870
Black	3.6% ±1.1 pp1,868 ±595
Asian	45.1% ±2.7 pp23,393 ±1,381
Other or Multi-racial	3.2% ±0.7 pp1,646 ±389
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Hispanic	22.2%±2.7 pp11,511±1,400	29.7%±0.2 pp805,318±5,785	▼ -7.5%	22/50
White	26.0%±1.7 pp13,487±870	32.1%±0.2 pp870,127±5,557	▼ -6.1%	25/50
Black	3.6%±1.1 pp1,868±595	27.4%±0.2 pp743,710±6,047	▼ -23.8%	38/50
Asian	45.1%±2.7 pp23,393±1,381	7.2%±0.2 pp196,435±4,370	▲ +37.8%	1/50
Other or Multi-racial	3.2%±0.7 pp1,646±389	3.5%±0.1 pp95,636±3,778	▼ -0.4%	27/50
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Hispanic	23.7% ±2.0 pp12,126 ±1,039	19.6% ±1.9 pp10,392 ±988	22.2% ±2.7 pp11,511 ±1,400	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −615▲ +2.5 pp▲ +1,119▼ −4.1 pp▼ −1,734
Chicago citywide	28.9% ±0.2 pp785,292 ±4,750	28.8% ±0.2 pp780,167 ±5,832	29.7% ±0.2 pp805,318 ±5,785	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +20,026▲ +0.9 pp▲ +25,151▼ −0.2 pp▼ −5,125
White	27.7% ±1.4 pp14,147 ±727	29.6% ±1.8 pp15,633 ±927	26.0% ±1.7 pp13,487 ±870	▼ −1.7 pp▼ −660▼ −3.6 pp▼ −2,146▲ +1.9 pp▲ +1,486
Chicago citywide	32.2% ±0.2 pp872,513 ±4,319	33.3% ±0.2 pp901,769 ±4,468	32.1% ±0.2 pp870,127 ±5,557	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2,386▼ −1.2 pp▼ −31,642▲ +1.1 pp▲ +29,256
Black	3.1% ±0.7 pp1,584 ±376	2.4% ±0.8 pp1,277 ±409	3.6% ±1.1 pp1,868 ±595	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +284▲ +1.2 pp▲ +591▼ −0.7 pp▼ −307
Chicago citywide	31.5% ±0.1 pp853,214 ±3,755	29.2% ±0.2 pp790,893 ±4,690	27.4% ±0.2 pp743,710 ±6,047	▼ −4.0 pp▼ −109,504▼ −1.8 pp▼ −47,183▼ −2.3 pp▼ −62,321
Asian	42.9% ±1.9 pp21,912 ±992	47.4% ±2.2 pp25,071 ±1,180	45.1% ±2.7 pp23,393 ±1,381	▲ +2.2 pp▲ +1,481▼ −2.3 pp▼ −1,678▲ +4.5 pp▲ +3,159
Chicago citywide	5.7% ±0.1 pp154,287 ±2,942	6.5% ±0.1 pp177,195 ±3,532	7.2% ±0.2 pp196,435 ±4,370	▲ +1.6 pp▲ +42,148▲ +0.7 pp▲ +19,240▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,908
Other or Multi-racial	2.7% ±0.9 pp1,358 ±440	1.0% ±0.5 pp527 ±246	3.2% ±0.7 pp1,646 ±389	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +288▲ +2.2 pp▲ +1,119▼ −1.7 pp▼ −831
Chicago citywide	1.7% ±0.1 pp47,302 ±1,990	2.2% ±0.1 pp59,510 ±2,584	3.5% ±0.1 pp95,636 ±3,778	▲ +1.8 pp▲ +48,334▲ +1.3 pp▲ +36,126▲ +0.5 pp▲ +12,208

Age Distribution

Category	Ward 11
Under 5	4.1% ±0.8 pp2,141 ±432
5-17	12.9% ±1.3 pp6,674 ±679
18-24	8.5% ±1.2 pp4,397 ±631
25-44	31.5% ±1.7 pp16,343 ±864
45-64	25.5% ±1.5 pp13,220 ±781
65-74	11.0% ±1.2 pp5,708 ±624
75-84	4.2% ±0.8 pp2,165 ±391
85+	2.4% ±0.6 pp1,257 ±322
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Under 5	4.1%±0.8 pp2,141±432	5.3%±0.1 pp144,044±3,726	▼ -1.2%	41/50
5-17	12.9%±1.3 pp6,674±679	14.1%±0.2 pp381,582±5,292	▼ -1.2%	35/50
18-24	8.5%±1.2 pp4,397±631	9.6%±0.2 pp260,942±4,703	▼ -1.2%	32/50
25-44	31.5%±1.7 pp16,343±864	34.3%±0.2 pp929,946±6,124	▼ -2.8%	24/50
45-64	25.5%±1.5 pp13,220±781	22.9%±0.2 pp620,047±5,184	▲ +2.6%	15/50
65-74	11.0%±1.2 pp5,708±624	8.2%±0.1 pp221,932±3,538	▲ +2.8%	6/50
75-84	4.2%±0.8 pp2,165±391	4.0%±0.1 pp107,625±2,624	▲ +0.2%	24/50
85+	2.4%±0.6 pp1,257±322	1.7%±0.1 pp45,108±1,900	▲ +0.8%	7/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category	Ward 11
No High School Diploma	20.3% ±2.1 pp7,836 ±802
High School Diploma or GED	25.1% ±2.2 pp9,715 ±855
Some College or Associate's Degree	18.0% ±1.7 pp6,962 ±654
Bachelor's Degree	21.7% ±2.0 pp8,400 ±788
Graduate Degree	14.9% ±1.5 pp5,767 ±563
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
No High School Diploma	20.3%±2.1 pp7,836±802	12.8%±0.2 pp246,015±4,665	▲ +7.5%	12/50
High School Diploma or GED	25.1%±2.2 pp9,715±855	21.1%±0.3 pp405,248±5,594	▲ +4.1%	23/50
Some College or Associate's Degree	18.0%±1.7 pp6,962±654	21.8%±0.3 pp419,911±5,261	▼ -3.8%	38/50
Bachelor's Degree	21.7%±2.0 pp8,400±788	25.4%±0.3 pp488,467±5,561	▼ -3.7%	27/50
Graduate Degree	14.9%±1.5 pp5,767±563	19.0%±0.3 pp365,017±4,874	▼ -4.1%	25/50
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category	Ward 11
Total Population	51,905 ±2,218
Total Households	21,452 ±802
Population Density	11,371 ±486 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	Average Ward	Difference
Total Population	51,905	54,206	▼ −2,301
Total Households	21,452	23,200	▼ −1,748
Population Density	11,371 people/sq mi	16,281 people/sq mi	▼ −4,910
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average ward rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large wards. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19	Difference	Rank
Total Population	51,127 ±1,503	52,900 ±1,673	51,905 ±2,218	▲ +778 ±2,679▼ −995 ±2,778▲ +1,773 ±2,249	▼ −3,103▼ −1,266▼ −2,301	42/5030/5037/50
Average Ward	54,230	54,166	54,206	▼ −24▲ +40▼ −64
Total Households	18,959 ±355	19,960 ±384	21,452 ±802	▲ +2,493 ±877▲ +1,492 ±889▲ +1,001 ±523	▼ −1,609▼ −1,360▼ −1,748	32/5026/5027/50
Average Ward	20,568	21,320	23,200	▲ +2,631▲ +1,880▲ +751
Population Density (per sq mi)	11,201 ±329	11,589 ±367	11,371 ±486	▲ +170▼ −218▲ +388	▼ −4,715▼ −4,523▼ −4,910	34/5031/5032/50
Average Ward Density	15,916	16,112	16,281	▲ +366▲ +169▲ +196

Household Size

Category	Ward 11
Average Household Size	2.41±0.12
1-Person Households	32.2% ±3.0 pp6,916 ±646
2-Person Households	27.1% ±2.4 pp5,818 ±504
3-Person Households	21.5% ±2.3 pp4,609 ±487
4+ Person Households	19.2% ±2.1 pp4,110 ±449
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Size	2.41±0.12	2.29±0.02	▲ +0.12	28/50
1-Person Households	32.2%±3.0 pp6,916±646	39.7%±0.4 pp460,268±4,301	▼ -7.4%	29/50
2-Person Households	27.1%±2.4 pp5,818±504	29.5%±0.4 pp342,235±4,195	▼ -2.4%	35/50
3-Person Households	21.5%±2.3 pp4,609±487	12.9%±0.3 pp149,291±3,231	▲ +8.6%	1/50
4+ Person Households	19.2%±2.1 pp4,110±449	18.0%±0.3 pp208,411±4,023	▲ +1.2%	27/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category	Ward 11
Never Married	38.0% ±2.3 pp16,991 ±1,035
Married	47.2% ±1.2 pp21,110 ±559
Separated	1.2% ±0.5 pp531 ±220
Divorced	7.2% ±1.0 pp3,220 ±442
Widowed	6.4% ±1.1 pp2,872 ±486
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Never Married	38.0%±2.3 pp16,991±1,035	49.6%±0.3 pp1,130,286±6,623	▼ -11.6%	45/50
Married	47.2%±1.2 pp21,110±559	35.5%±0.3 pp807,294±6,077	▲ +11.7%	7/50
Separated	1.2%±0.5 pp531±220	2.2%±0.1 pp49,430±2,379	▼ -1.0%	40/50
Divorced	7.2%±1.0 pp3,220±442	7.9%±0.2 pp180,700±3,966	▼ -0.7%	31/50
Widowed	6.4%±1.1 pp2,872±486	4.8%±0.1 pp109,357±2,738	▲ +1.6%	12/50
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category	Ward 11
Speak English Only	42.4% ±2.3 pp21,129 ±1,157
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese)	37.8% ±2.8 pp18,830 ±1,411
Spanish	14.7% ±2.1 pp7,329 ±1,062
Other Languages	3.5% ±0.8 pp1,760 ±409
Other Indo-European	1.7% ±0.5 pp827 ±263
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this ward, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Speak English Only	42.4%±2.3 pp21,129±1,157	64.6%±0.3 pp1,659,069±8,218	▼ -22.3%	42/50
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese)	37.8%±2.8 pp18,830±1,411	2.0%±0.1 pp52,032±2,783	▲ +35.7%	1/20
Spanish	14.7%±2.1 pp7,329±1,062	23.7%±0.2 pp607,865±6,166	▼ -9.0%	27/50
Other Languages	3.5%±0.8 pp1,760±409	1.0%±0.1 pp25,292±2,452	▲ +2.5%	17/50
Other Indo-European	1.7%±0.5 pp827±263	2.4%±0.1 pp61,672±3,192	▼ -0.7%	24/27
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this ward, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 11
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	65.0% ±2.3 pp65.0%±2.3 pp32,338 ±1,167
Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents age 5+)	35.0% ±2.2 pp35.0%±2.2 pp17,426 ±1,082
↳ Speaks English Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	12.3% ±1.4 pp35.2%±3.5 pp6,136 ±722
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	12.5% ±1.3 pp35.6%±3.1 pp6,200 ±661
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	10.2% ±1.5 pp29.2%±4.0 pp5,090 ±759
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	65.0%±2.3 pp65.0%±2.3 pp32,338±1,167	85.4%±0.5 pp85.4%±0.5 pp2,192,778±11,961	▼ -20.4%▼ -20.4%	47/50
Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents age 5+)	35.0%±2.2 pp35.0%±2.2 pp17,426±1,082	14.6%±0.3 pp14.6%±0.3 pp374,404±6,794	▲ +20.4%▲ +20.4%	4/50
↳ Speaks English Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	12.3%±1.4 pp35.2%±3.5 pp6,136±722	7.1%±0.2 pp48.9%±0.9 pp183,252±4,686	▲ +5.2%▼ -13.7%	10/5049/50
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	12.5%±1.3 pp35.6%±3.1 pp6,200±661	5.2%±0.2 pp35.6%±0.8 pp133,269±3,923	▲ +7.3%0%	6/5023/50
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	10.2%±1.5 pp29.2%±4.0 pp5,090±759	2.3%±0.1 pp15.5%±0.7 pp57,883±2,982	▲ +8.0%▲ +13.7%	1/502/50
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category	Ward 11
Married-Couple Households	41.5% ±2.6 pp8,904 ±553
Unmarried-Couple Households	6.8% ±1.6 pp1,450 ±338
One-Person Households	32.2% ±3.6 pp6,916 ±766
Other Household Types	19.5% ±6.3 pp4,182 ±1,344
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Married-Couple Households	41.5%±2.6 pp8,904±553	30.9%±0.3 pp358,432±3,598	▲ +10.6%	15/50
Unmarried-Couple Households	6.8%±1.6 pp1,450±338	8.3%±0.2 pp96,220±2,797	▼ -1.5%	30/50
One-Person Households	32.2%±3.6 pp6,916±766	39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,729	▼ -7.4%	29/50
Other Household Types	19.5%±6.3 pp4,182±1,344	21.1%±0.7 pp245,285±8,514	▼ -1.6%	29/50
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category	Ward 11
Children in Married-Couple Households	66.3% ±2.9 pp5,805 ±253
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	6.5% ±3.9 pp573 ±343
Children in Single-Mother Households	23.6% ±5.9 pp2,070 ±520
Children in Single-Father Households	3.6% ±2.2 pp313 ±195
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households	66.3%±2.9 pp5,805±253	56.0%±0.8 pp293,542±4,257	▲ +10.3%	20/50
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	6.5%±3.9 pp573±343	8.8%±0.6 pp45,960±3,208	▼ -2.2%	31/50
Children in Single-Mother Households	23.6%±5.9 pp2,070±520	30.6%±0.9 pp160,535±4,521	▼ -7.0%	23/50
Children in Single-Father Households	3.6%±2.2 pp313±195	4.6%±0.4 pp24,133±2,006	▼ -1.0%	34/50
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 11
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	2.3% ±0.8 pp2.3%±0.8 pp971 ±358
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	29.7% ±14.5 pp0.7%±0.3 pp289 ±141
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	8.8% ±9.9 pp0.2%±0.2 pp85 ±96
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	39.6% ±22.3 pp0.9%±0.5 pp384 ±217
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	4.5% ±8.3 pp0.1%±0.2 pp44 ±81
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	17.4% ±15.8 pp0.4%±0.4 pp169 ±153
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	2.3%±0.8 pp2.3%±0.8 pp971±358	2.8%±0.1 pp2.8%±0.1 pp60,766±2,397	▼ -0.5%▼ -0.5%	30/50
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	29.7%±14.5 pp0.7%±0.3 pp289±141	26.8%±1.8 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,267±1,067	▲ +2.9%▼ -0.1%	22/5026/50
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	8.8%±9.9 pp0.2%±0.2 pp85±96	12.9%±1.0 pp0.4%±0.0 pp7,830±579	▼ -4.1%▼ -0.2%	30/5033/50
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	39.6%±22.3 pp0.9%±0.5 pp384±217	28.8%±1.4 pp0.8%±0.0 pp17,525±846	▲ +10.7%▲ +0.1%	5/5020/50
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	4.5%±8.3 pp0.1%±0.2 pp44±81	4.9%±0.7 pp0.1%±0.0 pp2,995±441	▼ -0.4%0%	24/5025/50
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	17.4%±15.8 pp0.4%±0.4 pp169±153	26.6%±1.5 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,149±916	▼ -9.2%▼ -0.3%	41/5039/50
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 11
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	61.9% ±2.2 pp61.9%±2.2 pp32,130 ±1,163
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	38.1% ±2.1 pp38.1%±2.1 pp19,775 ±1,115
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	21.9% ±1.6 pp57.6%±2.6 pp11,383 ±817
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	16.2% ±1.8 pp42.4%±4.1 pp8,392 ±944
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	61.9%±2.2 pp61.9%±2.2 pp32,130±1,163	79.1%±0.3 pp79.1%±0.3 pp2,144,343±7,926	▼ -17.2%▼ -17.2%	47/50
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	38.1%±2.1 pp38.1%±2.1 pp19,775±1,115	20.9%±0.3 pp20.9%±0.3 pp566,883±7,968	▲ +17.2%▲ +17.2%	4/50
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	21.9%±1.6 pp57.6%±2.6 pp11,383±817	10.0%±0.2 pp47.7%±0.5 pp270,551±4,603	▲ +12.0%▲ +9.8%	2/508/50
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	16.2%±1.8 pp42.4%±4.1 pp8,392±944	10.9%±0.2 pp52.3%±0.9 pp296,332±6,504	▲ +5.2%▼ -9.8%	10/5043/50
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show

Category	Ward 11
Born in China / Hong Kong (of foreign-born residents)	27.1%±2.1 pp71.1%±1.9 pp14,098±1,070
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents)	4.0%±0.9 pp10.4%±2.3 pp2,067±479
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	7.0%18.4%3,645
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	Chicago	Difference	Rank
Born in China / Hong Kong (of foreign-born residents)	27.1% ±2.1 pp71.1%±1.9 pp14,098	1.4% ±0.1 pp6.7%38,255	▲ +25.7%▲ +64.4%	1/501/50
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents)	4.0% ±0.9 pp10.4%±2.3 pp2,067	8.2% ±0.2 pp39.3%222,978	▼ -4.3%▼ -28.9%	27/5039/50
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	7.0%18.4%3,645	——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show

Category	Ward 11
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	9.8% ±1.5 pp25.8%±3.6 pp5,113 ±778
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	10.9% ±1.6 pp28.7%±3.8 pp5,690 ±826
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	6.3% ±0.9 pp16.4%±2.2 pp3,256 ±484
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	11.1% ±1.3 pp29.1%±3.0 pp5,765 ±675
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	9.8%±1.5 pp25.8%±3.6 pp5,113±778	5.9%±0.2 pp804.3%±54.6 pp159,447±5,557	▲ +3.9%▼ -778.5%	9/5028/50
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	10.9%±1.6 pp28.7%±3.8 pp5,690±826	4.5%±0.1 pp615.0%±41.2 pp121,912±4,035	▲ +6.4%▼ -586.3%	2/504/50
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	6.3%±0.9 pp16.4%±2.2 pp3,256±484	4.6%±0.1 pp624.7%±41.4 pp123,849±3,901	▲ +1.7%▼ -608.3%	15/5041/50
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	11.1%±1.3 pp29.1%±3.0 pp5,765±675	6.0%±0.1 pp815.6%±50.6 pp161,675±3,491	▲ +5.1%▼ -786.5%	9/5021/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later	4.3% ±1.1 pp2,209 ±552	9.0% ±1.3 pp4,752 ±708	9.8% ±1.5 pp5,113 ±778	▲ +5.5 pp▲ +2,904▲ +0.9 pp▲ +361▲ +4.6 pp▲ +2,543
Chicago citywide	1.4% ±0.1 pp36,978 ±2,235	3.7% ±0.1 pp99,118 ±3,198	5.9% ±0.2 pp159,447 ±5,568	▲ +4.5 pp▲ +122,469▲ +2.2 pp▲ +60,329▲ +2.3 pp▲ +62,140
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009	13.3% ±1.5 pp6,809 ±767	11.3% ±1.3 pp6,017 ±675	10.9% ±1.6 pp5,690 ±827	▼ −2.4 pp▼ −1,119▼ −0.4 pp▼ −327▼ −2.0 pp▼ −792
Chicago citywide	5.9% ±0.1 pp161,331 ±3,896	4.9% ±0.1 pp131,658 ±3,182	4.5% ±0.1 pp121,912 ±4,044	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −39,419▼ −0.4 pp▼ −9,746▼ −1.1 pp▼ −29,673
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999	9.2% ±1.1 pp4,683 ±553	7.2% ±0.9 pp3,810 ±502	6.3% ±0.9 pp3,256 ±484	▼ −2.9 pp▼ −1,427▼ −0.9 pp▼ −554▼ −2.0 pp▼ −873
Chicago citywide	6.1% ±0.1 pp165,077 ±3,717	5.3% ±0.1 pp142,413 ±3,015	4.6% ±0.1 pp123,849 ±3,911	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −41,228▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,564▼ −0.8 pp▼ −22,664
Entered the U.S. Before 1990	13.4% ±1.2 pp6,853 ±636	13.9% ±1.1 pp7,367 ±599	11.1% ±1.3 pp5,765 ±675	▼ −2.3 pp▼ −1,088▼ −2.8 pp▼ −1,602▲ +0.5 pp▲ +514
Chicago citywide	7.5% ±0.1 pp204,169 ±3,469	6.9% ±0.1 pp186,050 ±3,114	6.0% ±0.1 pp161,675 ±3,509	▼ −1.6 pp▼ −42,494▼ −0.9 pp▼ −24,375▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,119

Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category	Ward 11
Average Household Income	$95,974±$4,075
Per Capita Income	$39,366±$1,375
10th Percentile Household Income	$13,988±$1,344
25th Percentile Household Income	$30,885±$4,173
Median Household Income	$71,501±$3,862
75th Percentile Household Income	$131,885±$8,035
90th Percentile Household Income	Over $200,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$95,974±$4,075	$116,016±$1,263	▼ −$20,042	29/50
Per Capita Income	$39,366±$1,375	$50,086±$581	▼ −$10,720	27/50
10th Percentile Household Income	$13,988±$1,344	$12,933±$271	▲ +$1,054	28/50
25th Percentile Household Income	$30,885±$4,173	$34,575±$649	▼ −$3,691	29/50
Median Household Income	$71,501±$3,862	$77,902±$907	▼ −$6,401	28/50
75th Percentile Household Income	$131,885±$8,035	$144,150±$1,210	▼ −$12,264	26/50
90th Percentile Household Income	Over $200,000	Over $200,000	—	1/50
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$69,789 ±2,558	$85,183 ±3,721	$95,974 ±4,075	▲ +$26,184▲ +$10,790▲ +$15,394
Chicago citywide	$95,689 ±910	$111,304 ±1,075	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$20,327▲ +$4,712▲ +$15,615
Average Household Income (nominal dollars)	$52,669 ±1,930	$69,424 ±3,032	$95,974 ±4,075	▲ +$43,305▲ +$26,549▲ +$16,756
Chicago citywide	$72,215 ±687	$90,713 ±876	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$43,801▲ +$25,303▲ +$18,498
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$27,219 ±771	$33,788 ±1,237	$39,366 ±1,375	▲ +$12,147▲ +$5,578▲ +$6,569
Chicago citywide	$37,927 ±351	$45,525 ±412	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$12,160▲ +$4,562▲ +$7,598
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars)	$20,542 ±582	$27,537 ±1,008	$39,366 ±1,375	▲ +$18,824▲ +$11,829▲ +$6,995
Chicago citywide	$28,623 ±265	$37,103 ±336	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$21,464▲ +$12,984▲ +$8,480
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$9,708 ±1,071	$12,188 ±1,537	$13,988 ±1,344	▲ +$4,279▲ +$1,799▲ +$2,480
Chicago citywide	$11,828 ±190	$13,281 ±277	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$1,105▼ −$348▲ +$1,453
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$7,327 ±808	$9,934 ±1,253	$13,988 ±1,344	▲ +$6,661▲ +$4,054▲ +$2,607
Chicago citywide	$8,927 ±144	$10,824 ±225	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$4,007▲ +$2,109▲ +$1,898
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$23,068 ±1,702	$27,694 ±2,123	$30,885 ±4,173	▲ +$7,817▲ +$3,191▲ +$4,626
Chicago citywide	$28,727 ±321	$31,597 ±462	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$5,848▲ +$2,979▲ +$2,869
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$17,409 ±1,284	$22,570 ±1,730	$30,885 ±4,173	▲ +$13,476▲ +$8,314▲ +$5,162
Chicago citywide	$21,680 ±242	$25,751 ±376	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$12,895▲ +$8,824▲ +$4,071
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$49,941 ±2,843	$61,440 ±3,968	$71,501 ±3,862	▲ +$21,560▲ +$10,061▲ +$11,500
Chicago citywide	$63,379 ±591	$71,469 ±723	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$14,523▲ +$6,433▲ +$8,090
Median Household Income (nominal dollars)	$37,689 ±2,145	$50,074 ±3,234	$71,501 ±3,862	▲ +$33,812▲ +$21,427▲ +$12,385
Chicago citywide	$47,831 ±446	$58,247 ±589	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$30,071▲ +$19,655▲ +$10,416
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$96,786 ±4,034	$117,060 ±5,392	$131,885 ±8,035	▲ +$35,099▲ +$14,826▲ +$20,273
Chicago citywide	$122,019 ±806	$139,501 ±1,057	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$22,131▲ +$4,648▲ +$17,482
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$73,043 ±3,044	$95,404 ±4,395	$131,885 ±8,035	▲ +$58,842▲ +$36,482▲ +$22,361
Chicago citywide	$92,086 ±608	$113,694 ±862	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$52,064▲ +$30,456▲ +$21,608
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$156,349 ±8,551	$195,321 ±12,174	—	——▲ +$38,973
Chicago citywide	$202,601 ±2,442	$235,390 ±1,636	—	——▲ +$32,790
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$117,994 ±6,453	$159,187 ±9,922	—	——▲ +$41,193
Chicago citywide	$152,899 ±1,843	$191,844 ±1,333	—	——▲ +$38,944

Poverty Status

Category	Ward 11
Below Poverty Line	18.1% ±2.6 pp9,374 ±1,351
Below 200% Poverty Line	36.8% ±3.4 pp19,110 ±1,778
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	6.4% ±1.1 pp3,312 ±558
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Below Poverty Line	18.1%±2.6 pp9,374±1,351	16.8%±0.4 pp456,194±11,330	▲ +1.2%	24/50
Below 200% Poverty Line	36.8%±3.4 pp19,110±1,778	33.4%±0.6 pp905,794±16,660	▲ +3.4%	22/50
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	6.4%±1.1 pp3,312±558	8.3%±0.3 pp226,117±7,649	▼ -2.0%	30/50
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Category	Ward 11
Food Insecurity	24.3%9,700
Housing Insecurity	15.6%6,239
Transportation Barriers	10.0%3,988
Threatened Utility Shutoff	8.1%3,240
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Food Insecurity	24.3%9,700	24.4%509,385	▼ -0.1%	25/50
Housing Insecurity	15.6%6,239	19.7%411,266	▼ -4.1%	33/50
Transportation Barriers	10.0%3,988	11.6%242,167	▼ -1.6%	31/50
Threatened Utility Shutoff	8.1%3,240	11.9%248,430	▼ -3.8%	34/50
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category	Ward 11
In Labor Force	87.4% ±1.9 pp20,379 ±445
↳ Employed	81.4% ±2.2 pp18,975 ±517
↳ Unemployed	5.7% ±1.4 pp1,321 ±316
↳ Unemployment Rate	6.5% ±1.6 pp—
Not in Labor Force	12.6% ±7.5 pp2,927 ±1,748
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
In Labor Force	87.4%±1.9 pp20,379±445	85.6%±0.3 pp1,069,076±3,571	▲ +1.9%	20/50
↳ Employed	81.4%±2.2 pp18,975±517	79.6%±0.3 pp994,466±4,015	▲ +1.8%	24/50
↳ Unemployed	5.7%±1.4 pp1,321±316	5.9%±0.2 pp73,968±2,565	▼ -0.3%	26/50
↳ Unemployment Rate	6.5%±1.6 pp—	6.9%±0.2 pp86,502±3,074	▼ -0.4%	24/50
Not in Labor Force	12.6%±7.5 pp2,927±1,748	14.4%±1.1 pp180,399±13,145	▼ -1.9%	31/50
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category	Ward 11
Management, Business, Science & Arts	46.7% ±3.6 pp12,752 ±969
↳ Management Occupations	8.5% ±1.4 pp2,330 ±385
↳ Business & Financial Operations	7.5% ±1.5 pp2,046 ±414
↳ Computer & Mathematical	5.5% ±1.0 pp1,497 ±271
↳ Architecture & Engineering	2.4% ±0.7 pp651 ±189
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	1.3% ±0.6 pp367 ±161
↳ Community & Social Service	2.3% ±1.2 pp626 ±336
↳ Legal Occupations	1.6% ±0.9 pp437 ±238
↳ Education, Training & Library	8.2% ±1.4 pp2,233 ±392
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	3.8% ±1.7 pp1,046 ±458
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	4.4% ±1.1 pp1,210 ±289
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	1.1% ±0.5 pp308 ±135
Service	20.6% ±2.4 pp5,628 ±656
↳ Healthcare Support	2.9% ±0.8 pp798 ±207
↳ Protective Service	2.0% ±0.7 pp539 ±205
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	10.3% ±1.8 pp2,808 ±479
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	2.8% ±0.8 pp756 ±226
↳ Personal Care & Service	2.7% ±0.8 pp726 ±222
Sales & Office	16.1% ±2.0 pp4,395 ±550
↳ Sales & Related	8.5% ±1.6 pp2,326 ±441
↳ Office & Administrative Support	7.6% ±1.3 pp2,070 ±342
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	3.9% ±1.0 pp1,074 ±265
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.2% ±0.5 pp63 ±127
↳ Construction & Extraction	2.2% ±0.7 pp608 ±204
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	1.5% ±0.6 pp403 ±153
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	12.6% ±2.0 pp3,453 ±542
↳ Production Occupations	5.1% ±1.3 pp1,393 ±355
↳ Transportation Occupations	4.0% ±1.1 pp1,104 ±290
↳ Material Moving Occupations	3.5% ±1.1 pp956 ±291
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts	46.7%±3.6 pp12,752±969	49.2%±0.4 pp686,743±5,710	▼ -2.5%	22/50
↳ Management Occupations	8.5%±1.4 pp2,330±385	12.3%±0.3 pp172,182±3,807	▼ -3.8%	34/50
↳ Business & Financial Operations	7.5%±1.5 pp2,046±414	9.1%±0.2 pp127,081±3,358	▼ -1.6%	19/50
↳ Computer & Mathematical	5.5%±1.0 pp1,497±271	4.9%±0.2 pp68,921±2,690	▲ +0.5%	14/50
↳ Architecture & Engineering	2.4%±0.7 pp651±189	1.6%±0.1 pp22,779±1,380	▲ +0.8%	5/50
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	1.3%±0.6 pp367±161	1.4%±0.1 pp19,126±1,340	0%	23/50
↳ Community & Social Service	2.3%±1.2 pp626±336	1.9%±0.1 pp26,973±1,500	▲ +0.4%	18/50
↳ Legal Occupations	1.6%±0.9 pp437±238	2.3%±0.1 pp31,629±1,814	▼ -0.7%	24/50
↳ Education, Training & Library	8.2%±1.4 pp2,233±392	6.6%±0.2 pp92,316±2,697	▲ +1.6%	9/50
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	3.8%±1.7 pp1,046±458	3.1%±0.1 pp43,879±1,786	▲ +0.7%	15/50
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	4.4%±1.1 pp1,210±289	4.6%±0.2 pp63,551±2,652	▼ -0.1%	18/50
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	1.1%±0.5 pp308±135	1.3%±0.1 pp18,306±1,387	▼ -0.2%	35/50
Service	20.6%±2.4 pp5,628±656	16.9%±0.3 pp235,977±4,217	▲ +3.7%	21/50
↳ Healthcare Support	2.9%±0.8 pp798±207	3.4%±0.2 pp46,792±2,107	▼ -0.4%	31/50
↳ Protective Service	2.0%±0.7 pp539±205	2.8%±0.1 pp39,146±1,734	▼ -0.8%	30/50
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	10.3%±1.8 pp2,808±479	5.1%±0.2 pp70,514±2,393	▲ +5.2%	4/50
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	2.8%±0.8 pp756±226	3.0%±0.1 pp41,783±1,967	▼ -0.2%	32/50
↳ Personal Care & Service	2.7%±0.8 pp726±222	2.7%±0.1 pp37,742±1,657	0%	28/50
Sales & Office	16.1%±2.0 pp4,395±550	17.4%±0.3 pp243,580±4,754	▼ -1.4%	39/50
↳ Sales & Related	8.5%±1.6 pp2,326±441	8.1%±0.2 pp113,073±3,174	▲ +0.4%	17/50
↳ Office & Administrative Support	7.6%±1.3 pp2,070±342	9.3%±0.3 pp130,507±3,591	▼ -1.8%	42/50
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	3.9%±1.0 pp1,074±265	4.6%±0.2 pp64,338±2,929	▼ -0.7%	29/50
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.2%±0.5 pp63±127	0.1%±0.0 pp1,506±406	▲ +0.1%	9/50
↳ Construction & Extraction	2.2%±0.7 pp608±204	2.8%±0.1 pp39,432±2,062	▼ -0.6%	30/50
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	1.5%±0.6 pp403±153	1.7%±0.1 pp23,400±1,722	▼ -0.2%	29/50
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	12.6%±2.0 pp3,453±542	11.8%±0.3 pp165,261±3,629	▲ +0.8%	28/50
↳ Production Occupations	5.1%±1.3 pp1,393±355	4.2%±0.2 pp57,989±2,275	▲ +0.9%	23/50
↳ Transportation Occupations	4.0%±1.1 pp1,104±290	3.9%±0.2 pp54,099±2,118	▲ +0.2%	30/50
↳ Material Moving Occupations	3.5%±1.1 pp956±291	3.8%±0.2 pp53,173±2,312	▼ -0.3%	31/50
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category	Ward 11
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.2% ±0.4 pp50 ±107
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	0.2% ±0.4 pp50 ±107
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0% ±0.3 pp0
Construction	3.9% ±1.0 pp1,052 ±262
Manufacturing	8.1% ±1.4 pp2,215 ±376
Wholesale Trade	3.2% ±1.1 pp865 ±304
Retail Trade	7.0% ±1.6 pp1,907 ±426
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	6.2% ±1.1 pp1,695 ±294
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	5.3% ±1.0 pp1,434 ±280
↳ Utilities	1.0% ±0.5 pp261 ±128
Information	1.9% ±0.6 pp519 ±170
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	5.9% ±1.2 pp1,615 ±330
↳ Finance & Insurance	4.9% ±1.2 pp1,342 ±316
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.0% ±0.5 pp274 ±127
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	13.8% ±2.1 pp3,771 ±577
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	10.4% ±2.0 pp2,826 ±549
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0% ±0.3 pp13 ±78
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	3.4% ±0.9 pp933 ±246
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	23.7% ±2.0 pp6,460 ±549
↳ Educational Services	11.6% ±1.5 pp3,175 ±397
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	12.0% ±1.7 pp3,285 ±451
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	15.9% ±2.2 pp4,328 ±596
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	2.0% ±0.7 pp544 ±191
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	13.9% ±2.1 pp3,783 ±568
Other Services	6.2% ±1.4 pp1,702 ±387
Public Administration	4.1% ±1.2 pp1,124 ±329
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.2%±0.4 pp50±107	0.2%±0.0 pp—	0%	26/50
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	0.2%±0.4 pp50±107	0.2%±0.0 pp—	0%	22/50
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%±0.3 pp0	0.0%±0.0 pp—	0%	23/50
Construction	3.9%±1.0 pp1,052±262	3.8%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.1%	26/50
Manufacturing	8.1%±1.4 pp2,215±376	7.7%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.4%	19/50
Wholesale Trade	3.2%±1.1 pp865±304	2.0%±0.1 pp—	▲ +1.1%	5/50
Retail Trade	7.0%±1.6 pp1,907±426	8.2%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.2%	38/50
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	6.2%±1.1 pp1,695±294	7.1%±0.2 pp—	▼ -0.9%	33/50
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	5.3%±1.0 pp1,434±280	6.5%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.3%	36/50
↳ Utilities	1.0%±0.5 pp261±128	0.5%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.4%	7/50
Information	1.9%±0.6 pp519±170	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.2%	23/50
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	5.9%±1.2 pp1,615±330	8.8%±0.2 pp—	▼ -2.9%	35/50
↳ Finance & Insurance	4.9%±1.2 pp1,342±316	6.7%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.8%	28/50
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.0%±0.5 pp274±127	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▼ -1.1%	48/50
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	13.8%±2.1 pp3,771±577	18.2%±0.4 pp—	▼ -4.4%	27/50
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	10.4%±2.0 pp2,826±549	13.4%±0.3 pp—	▼ -3.1%	23/50
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%±0.3 pp13±78	0.1%±0.0 pp—	▼ -0.1%	33/50
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	3.4%±0.9 pp933±246	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.2%	38/50
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	23.7%±2.0 pp6,460±549	24.2%±0.4 pp—	▼ -0.5%	25/50
↳ Educational Services	11.6%±1.5 pp3,175±397	10.5%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.1%	14/50
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	12.0%±1.7 pp3,285±451	13.7%±0.3 pp—	▼ -1.6%	38/50
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	15.9%±2.2 pp4,328±596	9.1%±0.2 pp—	▲ +6.7%	1/50
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	2.0%±0.7 pp544±191	2.2%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.2%	28/50
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	13.9%±2.1 pp3,783±568	6.9%±0.2 pp—	▲ +6.9%	1/50
Other Services	6.2%±1.4 pp1,702±387	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.6%	7/50
Public Administration	4.1%±1.2 pp1,124±329	4.0%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.1%	23/50
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category	Ward 11
Private Company Employee	65.0% ±2.4 pp17,745 ±652
Self-Employed	7.9% ±1.4 pp2,144 ±381
Nonprofit	12.2% ±1.5 pp3,336 ±405
Government	14.4% ±1.9 pp3,934 ±516
Unpaid Family Worker	0.5% ±0.4 pp144 ±109
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Private Company Employee	65.0%±2.4 pp17,745±652	67.9%±0.4 pp947,845±5,822	▼ -2.9%	31/50
Self-Employed	7.9%±1.4 pp2,144±381	8.3%±0.2 pp115,690±2,989	▼ -0.4%	27/50
Nonprofit	12.2%±1.5 pp3,336±405	12.1%±0.3 pp169,124±4,035	▲ +0.1%	20/50
Government	14.4%±1.9 pp3,934±516	12.9%±0.3 pp179,945±4,021	▲ +1.5%	21/50
Unpaid Family Worker	0.5%±0.4 pp144±109	0.2%±0.0 pp2,312±408	▲ +0.4%	3/50
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category	Ward 11
Full-Time, Year-Round	61.8% ±2.1 pp18,515 ±643
Part-Time or Part-Year	38.2% ±2.5 pp11,434 ±735
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round	61.8%±2.1 pp18,515±643	67.0%±0.3 pp1,025,726±3,875	▼ -5.2%	39/50
Part-Time or Part-Year	38.2%±2.5 pp11,434±735	33.0%±0.3 pp504,210±4,897	▲ +5.2%	12/50
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category	Ward 11
Average FT Earnings	$76,445±$3,063
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$24,464±$2,324
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$42,067±$2,364
Median FT Earnings	$65,830±$3,045
75th Percentile FT Earnings	$97,874±$3,058
90th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Average FT Earnings	$76,445±$3,063	$96,214±$968	▼ −$19,769	27/50
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$24,464±$2,324	$29,008±$387	▼ −$4,544	36/50
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$42,067±$2,364	$43,011±$345	▼ −$944	22/50
Median FT Earnings	$65,830±$3,045	$69,663±$530	▼ −$3,833	20/50
75th Percentile FT Earnings	$97,874±$3,058	Over $100,000	▼ −$2,126+	24/50
90th Percentile FT Earnings	Over $100,000	Over $100,000	—	1/50
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$59,905 ±1,683	$68,548 ±2,360	$76,445 ±3,063	▲ +$16,540▲ +$7,897▲ +$8,643
Chicago citywide	$83,170 ±714	$91,467 ±682	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$13,044▲ +$4,747▲ +$8,297
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$45,209 ±1,270	$55,867 ±1,923	$76,445 ±3,063	▲ +$31,236▲ +$20,578▲ +$10,658
Chicago citywide	$62,767 ±539	$74,546 ±556	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$33,447▲ +$21,669▲ +$11,778
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$18,323 ±1,991	$22,871 ±1,984	$24,464 ±2,324	▲ +$6,141▲ +$1,593▲ +$4,548
Chicago citywide	$24,209 ±243	$26,113 ±152	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$4,799▲ +$2,895▲ +$1,904
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$13,828 ±1,503	$18,640 ±1,617	$24,464 ±2,324	▲ +$10,636▲ +$5,824▲ +$4,812
Chicago citywide	$18,270 ±183	$21,282 ±124	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$10,738▲ +$7,726▲ +$3,012
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$29,708 ±1,561	$33,508 ±1,646	$42,067 ±2,364	▲ +$12,359▲ +$8,559▲ +$3,800
Chicago citywide	$37,393 ±278	$39,415 ±229	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$5,618▲ +$3,597▲ +$2,021
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$22,420 ±1,178	$27,309 ±1,342	$42,067 ±2,364	▲ +$19,647▲ +$14,758▲ +$4,889
Chicago citywide	$28,220 ±210	$32,123 ±187	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$14,791▲ +$10,888▲ +$3,903
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$48,735 ±2,645	$54,711 ±2,850	$65,830 ±3,045	▲ +$17,095▲ +$11,119▲ +$5,976
Chicago citywide	$60,575 ±496	$64,628 ±327	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,034▲ +$4,054
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$36,780 ±1,996	$44,590 ±2,323	$65,830 ±3,045	▲ +$29,050▲ +$21,240▲ +$7,810
Chicago citywide	$45,715 ±374	$52,672 ±266	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$23,948▲ +$16,991▲ +$6,957
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$78,631 ±4,216	$90,859 ±4,852	$97,874 ±3,058	▲ +$19,243▲ +$7,016▲ +$12,227
Chicago citywide	$98,274 ±615	$108,202 ±616	—	——▲ +$9,928
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$59,342 ±3,182	$74,050 ±3,954	$97,874 ±3,058	▲ +$38,533▲ +$23,825▲ +$14,708
Chicago citywide	$74,166 ±464	$88,185 ±502	—	——▲ +$14,019
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$120,538 ±4,446	—	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$90,968 ±3,356	—	—	———
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category	Ward 11
Average PT Earnings	$27,993±$2,460
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$3,280±$850
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$8,969±$1,431
Median PT Earnings	$17,103±$1,549
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$34,543±$4,665
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$66,052±$9,437
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Average PT Earnings	$27,993±$2,460	$33,575±$750	▼ −$5,582	28/50
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$3,280±$850	$2,183±$87	▲ +$1,096	7/50
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$8,969±$1,431	$7,222±$206	▲ +$1,748	12/50
Median PT Earnings	$17,103±$1,549	$19,180±$393	▼ −$2,077	32/50
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$34,543±$4,665	$38,498±$681	▼ −$3,955	27/50
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$66,052±$9,437	$73,776±$1,391	▼ −$7,724	24/50
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$20,256 ±1,365	$25,505 ±2,492	$27,993 ±2,460	▲ +$7,737▲ +$2,488▲ +$5,249
Chicago citywide	$27,076 ±473	$31,236 ±676	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$6,500▲ +$2,340▲ +$4,160
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$15,287 ±1,030	$20,786 ±2,031	$27,993 ±2,460	▲ +$12,706▲ +$7,207▲ +$5,500
Chicago citywide	$20,433 ±357	$25,457 ±551	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$13,142▲ +$8,118▲ +$5,024
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,113 ±301	$2,385 ±438	$3,280 ±850	▲ +$1,167▲ +$895▲ +$272
Chicago citywide	$2,230 ±48	$2,283 ±59	$2,183 ±87	▼ −$47▼ −$100▲ +$53
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$1,594 ±227	$1,943 ±357	$3,280 ±850	▲ +$1,685▲ +$1,336▲ +$349
Chicago citywide	$1,683 ±36	$1,861 ±48	$2,183 ±87	▲ +$500▲ +$322▲ +$178
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$5,929 ±699	$7,173 ±960	$8,969 ±1,431	▲ +$3,040▲ +$1,796▲ +$1,243
Chicago citywide	$6,390 ±123	$6,841 ±156	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$832▲ +$381▲ +$451
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$4,475 ±527	$5,846 ±782	$8,969 ±1,431	▲ +$4,494▲ +$3,123▲ +$1,371
Chicago citywide	$4,822 ±93	$5,575 ±127	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$2,399▲ +$1,646▲ +$753
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$13,243 ±979	$14,771 ±1,132	$17,103 ±1,549	▲ +$3,860▲ +$2,332▲ +$1,528
Chicago citywide	$15,461 ±166	$17,025 ±275	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$3,719▲ +$2,155▲ +$1,563
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$9,994 ±739	$12,039 ±922	$17,103 ±1,549	▲ +$7,109▲ +$5,064▲ +$2,044
Chicago citywide	$11,668 ±125	$13,875 ±224	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$7,512▲ +$5,305▲ +$2,207
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$23,536 ±1,905	$31,435 ±4,351	$34,543 ±4,665	▲ +$11,007▲ +$3,108▲ +$7,899
Chicago citywide	$30,795 ±619	$34,779 ±505	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$7,703▲ +$3,719▲ +$3,984
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$17,762 ±1,438	$25,619 ±3,546	$34,543 ±4,665	▲ +$16,781▲ +$8,924▲ +$7,857
Chicago citywide	$23,241 ±468	$28,345 ±412	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$15,257▲ +$10,153▲ +$5,104
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$46,813 ±5,212	$55,094 ±6,444	$66,052 ±9,437	▲ +$19,239▲ +$10,958▲ +$8,281
Chicago citywide	$61,207 ±1,249	$68,040 ±1,298	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$12,570▲ +$5,737▲ +$6,833
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$35,329 ±3,934	$44,902 ±5,252	$66,052 ±9,437	▲ +$30,723▲ +$21,150▲ +$9,573
Chicago citywide	$46,192 ±942	$55,452 ±1,058	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$27,585▲ +$18,324▲ +$9,261

Earnings of All Workers

Category	Ward 11
Average Earnings	$58,379±$2,047
10th Percentile Earnings	$8,113±$1,193
25th Percentile Earnings	$19,318±$1,854
Median Earnings	$45,879±$2,481
75th Percentile Earnings	$78,493±$4,395
90th Percentile Earnings	Over $100,000
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Average Earnings	$58,379±$2,047	$75,571±$768	▼ −$17,192	29/50
10th Percentile Earnings	$8,113±$1,193	$8,529±$272	▼ −$416	25/50
25th Percentile Earnings	$19,318±$1,854	$25,183±$358	▼ −$5,865	37/50
Median Earnings	$45,879±$2,481	$51,367±$471	▼ −$5,488	25/50
75th Percentile Earnings	$78,493±$4,395	$93,324±$598	▼ −$14,831	28/50
90th Percentile Earnings	Over $100,000	Over $100,000	—	1/50
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$42,804 ±1,139	$53,270 ±1,891	$58,379 ±2,047	▲ +$15,575▲ +$5,108▲ +$10,467
Chicago citywide	$62,453 ±534	$71,626 ±551	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$13,118▲ +$3,945▲ +$9,173
Average Earnings (nominal dollars)	$32,303 ±860	$43,415 ±1,541	$58,379 ±2,047	▲ +$26,075▲ +$14,963▲ +$11,112
Chicago citywide	$47,133 ±403	$58,375 ±449	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$28,438▲ +$17,196▲ +$11,243
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$5,280 ±689	$7,831 ±879	$8,113 ±1,193	▲ +$2,833▲ +$282▲ +$2,551
Chicago citywide	$6,858 ±139	$8,358 ±164	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$1,671▲ +$171▲ +$1,500
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$3,985 ±520	$6,382 ±716	$8,113 ±1,193	▲ +$4,129▲ +$1,731▲ +$2,397
Chicago citywide	$5,176 ±105	$6,812 ±134	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$3,354▲ +$1,717▲ +$1,636
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$13,552 ±911	$18,903 ±1,588	$19,318 ±1,854	▲ +$5,766▲ +$414▲ +$5,351
Chicago citywide	$19,598 ±241	$23,173 ±290	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$5,585▲ +$2,010▲ +$3,576
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$10,227 ±688	$15,406 ±1,294	$19,318 ±1,854	▲ +$9,090▲ +$3,912▲ +$5,179
Chicago citywide	$14,790 ±182	$18,886 ±236	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$10,393▲ +$6,297▲ +$4,096
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$29,799 ±1,589	$39,161 ±1,665	$45,879 ±2,481	▲ +$16,080▲ +$6,718▲ +$9,362
Chicago citywide	$42,365 ±293	$47,195 ±370	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$9,002▲ +$4,172▲ +$4,830
Median Earnings (nominal dollars)	$22,489 ±1,199	$31,916 ±1,357	$45,879 ±2,481	▲ +$23,390▲ +$13,963▲ +$9,427
Chicago citywide	$31,972 ±221	$38,464 ±302	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$19,395▲ +$12,903▲ +$6,492
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$59,642 ±2,657	$72,277 ±3,059	$78,493 ±4,395	▲ +$18,851▲ +$6,216▲ +$12,635
Chicago citywide	$78,784 ±555	$87,853 ±597	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$14,540▲ +$5,471▲ +$9,069
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$45,011 ±2,005	$58,906 ±2,493	$78,493 ±4,395	▲ +$33,482▲ +$19,587▲ +$13,895
Chicago citywide	$59,457 ±418	$71,600 ±486	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$33,867▲ +$21,723▲ +$12,144
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$99,095 ±4,804	$116,918 ±3,881	—	——▲ +$17,823
Chicago citywide	$128,659 ±682	—	—	———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$74,785 ±3,625	$95,289 ±3,163	—	——▲ +$20,503
Chicago citywide	$97,097 ±515	—	—	———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 11

Category	Ward 11
Household income at age 35	$57,543 ±$1,091
Household income percentile rank	50.8 ±0.64 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	21.3% ±0.90 pp
Individual income at age 35	$41,711 ±$750
Fraction married	38.7% ±1.08 pp
Employment rate	77.7% ±0.92 pp
Incarceration rate	0.88% ±0.24 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 11. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 11 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$57,543 ±$1,091	$43,090 ±$102	+$14,454
Household income percentile rank	50.8 ±0.64 pp	40.9 ±0.06 pp	+9.9 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	21.3% ±0.90 pp	11.4% ±0.08 pp	+9.8 pp
Individual income at age 35	$41,711 ±$750	$33,544 ±$80	+$8,167
Fraction married	38.7% ±1.08 pp	26.4% ±0.11 pp	+12.3 pp
Employment rate	77.7% ±0.92 pp	74.4% ±0.11 pp	+3.3 pp
Incarceration rate	0.88% ±0.24 pp	2.87% ±0.05 pp	−2.0 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 11. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 11 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 11 in Lower-Income Families

Category	Ward 11
Household income at age 35	$49,847 ±$1,415
Household income percentile rank	45.9 ±0.89 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	16.1% ±1.29 pp
Individual income at age 35	$37,353 ±$1,040
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 11 with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 11 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$49,847 ±$1,415	$34,711 ±$124	+$15,135
Household income percentile rank	45.9 ±0.89 pp	35.3 ±0.09 pp	+10.5 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	16.1% ±1.29 pp	6.31% ±0.09 pp	+9.8 pp
Individual income at age 35	$37,353 ±$1,040	$28,716 ±$106	+$8,636
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 11 with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 11 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Ward 11

Category	Ward 11
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	85.3% ±0.79 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	30.9% ±1.04 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 11. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 11 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	85.3% ±0.79 pp	78.1% ±0.11 pp	+7.1 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	30.9% ±1.04 pp	22.9% ±0.11 pp	+8.1 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 11. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 11 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Ward 11

Category	Ward 11
All jobs located in ward 11	20,219
Ward 11 jobs held by Ward 11 residents	13.4%
Ward 11 jobs held by non-Ward 11 residents	86.6%
Employed residents working in Ward 11	11.5%
Employed residents working outside Ward 11	88.5%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 11	Chicago ward median	Difference	Rank
All jobs located in ward 11	20,219	11,093	▲ +9,126	12/50
Ward 11 jobs held by Ward 11 residents	13.4%	6.3%	▲ +7.1 pp	3/50
Ward 11 jobs held by non-Ward 11 residents	86.6%	93.7%	▼ −7.1 pp	48/50
Employed residents working in Ward 11	11.5%	3.2%	▲ +8.3 pp	4/50
Employed residents working outside Ward 11	88.5%	96.8%	▼ −8.3 pp	47/50
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in ward 11	19,069	18,675	20,219	▲ +1,150▲ +1,544▼ −394
Chicago citywide	10,920	11,554	11,093	▲ +174▼ −460▲ +634
Ward 11 jobs held by Ward 11 residents	14.2%2,346	15.2%2,562	13.4%2,432	▼ −0.8 pp▲ +86▼ −1.8 pp▼ −130▲ +1.0 pp▲ +216
Chicago citywide	6.4%696	6.4%725	6.3%701	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5▼ −0.1 pp▼ −24– 0.0 pp▲ +29
Ward 11 jobs held by non-Ward 11 residents	85.8%14,175	84.8%14,252	86.6%15,685	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +1,510▲ +1.8 pp▲ +1,433▼ −1.0 pp▲ +77
Chicago citywide	93.6%9,244	93.6%9,497	93.7%9,122	▲ +0.1 pp▼ −122▲ +0.1 pp▼ −375– 0.0 pp▲ +253
Employed residents working in Ward 11	12.1%2,346	12.1%2,562	11.5%2,432	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +86▼ −0.5 pp▼ −130▼ −0.1 pp▲ +216
Chicago citywide	3.3%696	3.0%725	3.2%701	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5▲ +0.1 pp▼ −24▼ −0.2 pp▲ +29
Employed residents working outside Ward 11	87.9%17,006	87.9%18,695	88.5%18,708	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +1,702▲ +0.5 pp▲ +13▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,689
Chicago citywide	96.7%19,233	97.0%20,782	96.8%20,998	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,765▼ −0.1 pp▲ +216▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,549

Industry of Jobs in Ward 11

Category	Ward 11
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0
Construction	4.3%879
Manufacturing	17.3%3,491
Wholesale Trade	18.8%3,809
Retail Trade	4.9%994
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	6.1%1,243
↳ Utilities	0.0%8
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	6.1%1,235
Information	0.5%101
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	3.2%651
↳ Finance & Insurance	2.5%496
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	0.8%155
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	11.6%2,339
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	3.9%793
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%8
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	7.6%1,538
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	9.4%1,895
↳ Educational Services	1.7%351
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	7.6%1,544
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	18.7%3,777
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	1.6%320
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	17.1%3,457
Other Services	5.1%1,037
Public Administration	0.0%3
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%0	0.0%423	0%	22/50
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%0	0.0%36	0%	10/50
Construction	4.3%879	1.9%27,207	▲ +2.5%	10/50
Manufacturing	17.3%3,491	4.4%64,747	▲ +12.8%	10/50
Wholesale Trade	18.8%3,809	2.8%41,460	▲ +16.0%	1/50
Retail Trade	4.9%994	6.6%96,413	▼ -1.7%	43/50
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	6.1%1,243	6.0%87,845	▲ +0.1%	14/50
↳ Utilities	0.0%8	0.3%5,012	▼ -0.3%	10/50
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	6.1%1,235	5.7%82,833	▲ +0.4%	12/50
Information	0.5%101	3.5%51,095	▼ -3.0%	33/50
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	3.2%651	10.8%157,520	▼ -7.5%	32/50
↳ Finance & Insurance	2.5%496	8.6%125,824	▼ -6.1%	18/50
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	0.8%155	2.2%31,696	▼ -1.4%	41/50
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	11.6%2,339	23.2%339,220	▼ -11.6%	27/50
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	3.9%793	14.2%207,444	▼ -10.3%	28/50
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%8	1.2%16,872	▼ -1.1%	29/50
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	7.6%1,538	7.9%114,904	▼ -0.2%	18/50
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	9.4%1,895	23.0%336,089	▼ -13.6%	42/50
↳ Educational Services	1.7%351	9.2%134,671	▼ -7.5%	38/50
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	7.6%1,544	13.8%201,418	▼ -6.1%	42/50
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	18.7%3,777	10.3%151,055	▲ +8.4%	11/50
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	1.6%320	1.9%27,339	▼ -0.3%	14/50
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	17.1%3,457	8.5%123,716	▲ +8.6%	8/50
Other Services	5.1%1,037	4.0%59,136	▲ +1.1%	20/50
Public Administration	0.0%3	3.5%51,418	▼ -3.5%	17/50
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.1%12	0.0%3	0.0%0	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −12– 0.0 pp▼ −3– 0.0 pp▼ −9
Chicago citywide	0.0%181	0.0%569	0.0%423	– 0.0 pp▲ +242– 0.0 pp▼ −146– 0.0 pp▲ +388
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.1%12	0.0%3	0.0%0	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −12– 0.0 pp▼ −3– 0.0 pp▼ −9
Chicago citywide	0.0%140	0.0%374	0.0%36	– 0.0 pp▼ −104– 0.0 pp▼ −338– 0.0 pp▲ +234
Construction	2.1%402	3.9%730	4.3%879	▲ +2.2 pp▲ +477▲ +0.4 pp▲ +149▲ +1.8 pp▲ +328
Chicago citywide	1.6%20,789	1.8%26,012	1.9%27,207	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,418– 0.0 pp▲ +1,195▲ +0.3 pp▲ +5,223
Manufacturing	21.6%4,112	19.7%3,675	17.3%3,491	▼ −4.3 pp▼ −621▼ −2.4 pp▼ −184▼ −1.9 pp▼ −437
Chicago citywide	4.6%61,066	4.5%63,597	4.4%64,747	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,681▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,150▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,531
Wholesale Trade	10.3%1,958	15.4%2,881	18.8%3,809	▲ +8.6 pp▲ +1,851▲ +3.4 pp▲ +928▲ +5.2 pp▲ +923
Chicago citywide	3.0%39,431	2.9%41,789	2.8%41,460	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,029▼ −0.1 pp▼ −329▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,358
Retail Trade	6.0%1,138	6.5%1,207	4.9%994	▼ −1.1 pp▼ −144▼ −1.5 pp▼ −213▲ +0.5 pp▲ +69
Chicago citywide	7.4%97,262	6.9%97,836	6.6%96,413	▼ −0.8 pp▼ −849▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,423▼ −0.5 pp▲ +574
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	8.2%1,570	5.7%1,071	6.1%1,243	▼ −2.1 pp▼ −327▲ +0.4 pp▲ +172▼ −2.5 pp▼ −499
Chicago citywide	5.4%71,371	5.6%79,303	6.0%87,845	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +16,474▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,542▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,932
Utilities	0.0%0	0.0%0	0.0%8	– 0.0 pp▲ +8– 0.0 pp▲ +8– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,383	0.3%4,956	0.3%5,012	– 0.0 pp▲ +629– 0.0 pp▲ +56– 0.0 pp▲ +573
Transportation & Warehousing	8.2%1,570	5.7%1,071	6.1%1,235	▼ −2.1 pp▼ −335▲ +0.4 pp▲ +164▼ −2.5 pp▼ −499
Chicago citywide	5.1%66,988	5.2%74,347	5.7%82,833	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +15,845▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,486▲ +0.1 pp▲ +7,359
Information	1.4%275	0.5%96	0.5%101	▼ −0.9 pp▼ −174– 0.0 pp▲ +5▼ −0.9 pp▼ −179
Chicago citywide	3.1%40,514	3.4%48,135	3.5%51,095	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +10,581▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,960▲ +0.3 pp▲ +7,621
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	3.7%709	4.3%812	3.2%651	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −58▼ −1.1 pp▼ −161▲ +0.6 pp▲ +103
Chicago citywide	10.5%138,287	10.6%150,163	10.8%157,520	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +19,233▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,357▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,876
Finance & Insurance	3.0%567	3.1%585	2.5%496	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −71▼ −0.7 pp▼ −89▲ +0.2 pp▲ +18
Chicago citywide	8.5%111,307	8.4%119,147	8.6%125,824	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14,517▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,677▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7,840
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	0.7%142	1.2%227	0.8%155	– 0.0 pp▲ +13▼ −0.4 pp▼ −72▲ +0.5 pp▲ +85
Chicago citywide	2.1%26,980	2.2%31,016	2.2%31,696	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,716– 0.0 pp▲ +680▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,036
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	9.0%1,722	12.6%2,355	11.6%2,339	▲ +2.5 pp▲ +617▼ −1.0 pp▼ −16▲ +3.6 pp▲ +633
Chicago citywide	21.2%278,928	22.6%319,744	23.2%339,220	▲ +2.0 pp▲ +60,292▲ +0.6 pp▲ +19,476▲ +1.3 pp▲ +40,816
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	2.4%455	3.4%636	3.9%793	▲ +1.5 pp▲ +338▲ +0.5 pp▲ +157▲ +1.0 pp▲ +181
Chicago citywide	11.8%155,200	12.9%182,462	14.2%207,444	▲ +2.4 pp▲ +52,244▲ +1.3 pp▲ +24,982▲ +1.1 pp▲ +27,262
Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.2%40	0.1%28	0.0%8	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −32▼ −0.1 pp▼ −20▼ −0.1 pp▼ −12
Chicago citywide	1.0%13,619	1.2%16,600	1.2%16,872	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,253– 0.0 pp▲ +272▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,981
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	6.4%1,227	9.1%1,691	7.6%1,538	▲ +1.2 pp▲ +311▼ −1.4 pp▼ −153▲ +2.6 pp▲ +464
Chicago citywide	8.4%110,109	8.5%120,682	7.9%114,904	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +4,795▼ −0.7 pp▼ −5,778▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,573
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	15.7%3,000	8.5%1,594	9.4%1,895	▼ −6.4 pp▼ −1,105▲ +0.8 pp▲ +301▼ −7.2 pp▼ −1,406
Chicago citywide	23.5%308,633	22.1%313,540	23.0%336,089	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +27,456▲ +0.8 pp▲ +22,549▼ −1.4 pp▲ +4,907
Educational Services	10.7%2,041	2.7%505	1.7%351	▼ −9.0 pp▼ −1,690▼ −1.0 pp▼ −154▼ −8.0 pp▼ −1,536
Chicago citywide	10.1%132,909	9.0%128,169	9.2%134,671	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +1,762▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,502▼ −1.1 pp▼ −4,740
Health Care & Social Assistance	5.0%959	5.8%1,089	7.6%1,544	▲ +2.6 pp▲ +585▲ +1.8 pp▲ +455▲ +0.8 pp▲ +130
Chicago citywide	13.4%175,724	13.1%185,371	13.8%201,418	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +25,694▲ +0.7 pp▲ +16,047▼ −0.3 pp▲ +9,647
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	16.1%3,072	17.6%3,287	18.7%3,777	▲ +2.6 pp▲ +705▲ +1.1 pp▲ +490▲ +1.5 pp▲ +215
Chicago citywide	10.9%143,753	11.5%162,749	10.3%151,055	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,302▼ −1.2 pp▼ −11,694▲ +0.5 pp▲ +18,996
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	4.1%778	2.1%388	1.6%320	▼ −2.5 pp▼ −458▼ −0.5 pp▼ −68▼ −2.0 pp▼ −390
Chicago citywide	1.7%22,179	2.1%30,178	1.9%27,339	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +5,160▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,839▲ +0.4 pp▲ +7,999
Accommodation & Food Services	12.0%2,294	15.5%2,899	17.1%3,457	▲ +5.1 pp▲ +1,163▲ +1.6 pp▲ +558▲ +3.5 pp▲ +605
Chicago citywide	9.3%121,574	9.4%132,571	8.5%123,716	▼ −0.8 pp▲ +2,142▼ −0.9 pp▼ −8,855▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,997
Other Services	5.7%1,079	5.2%964	5.1%1,037	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −42– 0.0 pp▲ +73▼ −0.5 pp▼ −115
Chicago citywide	4.5%59,098	4.4%61,698	4.0%59,136	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +38▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,562▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,600
Public Administration	0.1%20	0.0%0	0.0%3	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −17– 0.0 pp▲ +3▼ −0.1 pp▼ −20
Chicago citywide	4.2%54,814	3.6%51,684	3.5%51,418	▼ −0.7 pp▼ −3,396▼ −0.1 pp▼ −266▼ −0.5 pp▼ −3,130

Earnings of Jobs in Ward 11

Category	Ward 11
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	19.6%3,954
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	29.5%5,963
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	51.0%10,302
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	19.6%3,954	12.7%185,297	▲ +6.9%	17/50
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	29.5%5,963	20.5%299,480	▲ +9.0%	32/50
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	51.0%10,302	66.9%978,851	▼ -15.9%	22/50
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	31.9%6,083	26.4%4,930	19.6%3,954	▼ −12.3 pp▼ −2,129▼ −6.8 pp▼ −976▼ −5.5 pp▼ −1,153
Chicago citywide	21.3%280,137	16.8%238,135	12.7%185,297	▼ −8.7 pp▼ −94,840▼ −4.1 pp▼ −52,838▼ −4.5 pp▼ −42,002
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	37.3%7,105	34.5%6,437	29.5%5,963	▼ −7.8 pp▼ −1,142▼ −5.0 pp▼ −474▼ −2.8 pp▼ −668
Chicago citywide	30.7%403,250	26.7%378,530	20.5%299,480	▼ −10.2 pp▼ −103,770▼ −6.3 pp▼ −79,050▼ −4.0 pp▼ −24,720
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	30.8%5,881	39.1%7,308	51.0%10,302	▲ +20.1 pp▲ +4,421▲ +11.8 pp▲ +2,994▲ +8.3 pp▲ +1,427
Chicago citywide	48.0%630,740	56.5%800,154	66.9%978,851	▲ +18.9 pp▲ +348,111▲ +10.4 pp▲ +178,697▲ +8.5 pp▲ +169,414

Jobs in Ward 11 by Firm Age

Category	Ward 11
Firm age: 0–1 years	4.5%904
Firm age: 2–3 years	9.1%1,831
Firm age: 4–5 years	4.4%883
Firm age: 6–10 years	7.6%1,540
Firm age: 11 or more years	74.5%15,052
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years	4.5%904	2.8%37,293	▲ +1.6%	16/50
Firm age: 2–3 years	9.1%1,831	2.8%37,154	▲ +6.2%	1/50
Firm age: 4–5 years	4.4%883	3.2%41,869	▲ +1.2%	13/50
Firm age: 6–10 years	7.6%1,540	7.8%102,354	▼ -0.2%	31/50
Firm age: 11 or more years	74.5%15,052	83.4%1,098,247	▼ -8.9%	39/50
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years	2.8%535	3.5%648	4.5%904	▲ +1.7 pp▲ +369▲ +1.0 pp▲ +256▲ +0.7 pp▲ +113
Chicago citywide	2.9%33,224	2.6%33,244	2.8%37,293	– 0.0 pp▲ +4,069▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,049▼ −0.2 pp▲ +20
Firm age: 2–3 years	4.9%941	5.9%1,101	9.1%1,831	▲ +4.1 pp▲ +890▲ +3.2 pp▲ +730▲ +1.0 pp▲ +160
Chicago citywide	4.0%46,935	3.3%42,284	2.8%37,154	▼ −1.2 pp▼ −9,781▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,130▼ −0.7 pp▼ −4,651
Firm age: 4–5 years	4.1%790	3.6%670	4.4%883	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +93▲ +0.8 pp▲ +213▼ −0.6 pp▼ −120
Chicago citywide	3.7%42,688	3.6%46,058	3.2%41,869	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −819▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,189▼ −0.1 pp▲ +3,370
Firm age: 6–10 years	12.6%2,396	7.7%1,439	7.6%1,540	▼ −5.0 pp▼ −856▼ −0.1 pp▲ +101▼ −4.9 pp▼ −957
Chicago citywide	8.2%94,955	8.6%109,934	7.8%102,354	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +7,399▼ −0.9 pp▼ −7,580▲ +0.5 pp▲ +14,979
Firm age: 11 or more years	75.5%14,380	79.3%14,808	74.5%15,052	▼ −1.0 pp▲ +672▼ −4.9 pp▲ +244▲ +3.8 pp▲ +428
Chicago citywide	81.3%946,852	81.8%1,043,037	83.4%1,098,247	▲ +2.1 pp▲ +151,395▲ +1.6 pp▲ +55,210▲ +0.5 pp▲ +96,185

Jobs in Ward 11 by Firm Size

Category	Ward 11
Firm size: 0–19 employees	22.6%4,571
Firm size: 20–49 employees	12.6%2,538
Firm size: 50–249 employees	17.0%3,445
Firm size: 250–499 employees	7.0%1,421
Firm size: 500 or more employees	40.7%8,235
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees	22.6%4,571	12.8%168,975	▲ +9.8%	22/50
Firm size: 20–49 employees	12.6%2,538	7.3%96,432	▲ +5.2%	9/50
Firm size: 50–249 employees	17.0%3,445	13.8%181,123	▲ +3.3%	24/50
Firm size: 250–499 employees	7.0%1,421	5.7%74,787	▲ +1.4%	14/50
Firm size: 500 or more employees	40.7%8,235	60.4%795,600	▼ -19.7%	30/50
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees	22.3%4,242	23.6%4,408	22.6%4,571	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +329▼ −1.0 pp▲ +163▲ +1.3 pp▲ +166
Chicago citywide	13.9%162,248	13.3%169,949	12.8%168,975	▼ −1.1 pp▲ +6,727▼ −0.5 pp▼ −974▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,701
Firm size: 20–49 employees	11.2%2,142	16.0%2,992	12.6%2,538	▲ +1.3 pp▲ +396▼ −3.5 pp▼ −454▲ +4.8 pp▲ +850
Chicago citywide	8.4%97,503	8.2%103,945	7.3%96,432	▼ −1.0 pp▼ −1,071▼ −0.8 pp▼ −7,513▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,442
Firm size: 50–249 employees	17.0%3,233	16.9%3,147	17.0%3,445	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +212▲ +0.2 pp▲ +298▼ −0.1 pp▼ −86
Chicago citywide	15.7%183,275	14.9%189,930	13.8%181,123	▼ −2.0 pp▼ −2,152▼ −1.1 pp▼ −8,807▼ −0.8 pp▲ +6,655
Firm size: 250–499 employees	7.0%1,335	7.1%1,334	7.0%1,421	– 0.0 pp▲ +86▼ −0.1 pp▲ +87▲ +0.1 pp▼ −1
Chicago citywide	6.3%72,992	5.9%74,603	5.7%74,787	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,795▼ −0.2 pp▲ +184▼ −0.4 pp▲ +1,611
Firm size: 500 or more employees	42.5%8,090	36.3%6,785	40.7%8,235	▼ −1.7 pp▲ +145▲ +4.4 pp▲ +1,450▼ −6.1 pp▼ −1,305
Chicago citywide	55.7%648,636	57.8%736,130	60.4%795,600	▲ +4.7 pp▲ +146,964▲ +2.7 pp▲ +59,470▲ +2.1 pp▲ +87,494

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 11
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	12.3% ±1.3 pp12.3%±1.3 pp6,382 ±680
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	80.5% ±4.3 pp9.9%±0.5 pp5,139 ±273
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	19.5% ±4.8 pp2.4%±0.6 pp1,243 ±306
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	12.3%±1.3 pp12.3%±1.3 pp6,382±680	13.5%±0.2 pp13.5%±0.2 pp365,577±5,480	▼ -1.2%▼ -1.2%	34/50
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	80.5%±4.3 pp9.9%±0.5 pp5,139±273	83.0%±0.5 pp11.2%±0.1 pp303,520±1,897	▼ -2.5%▼ -1.3%	32/5034/50
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	19.5%±4.8 pp2.4%±0.6 pp1,243±306	17.0%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.1 pp62,057±2,247	▲ +2.5%▲ +0.1%	19/5016/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 11
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	7.9% ±1.1 pp7.9%±1.1 pp4,105 ±570
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	51.8% ±8.1 pp4.1%±0.6 pp2,127 ±331
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	48.2% ±6.3 pp3.8%±0.5 pp1,979 ±260
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	58.9% ±8.2 pp4.7%±0.6 pp2,417 ±335
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	41.1% ±6.5 pp3.3%±0.5 pp1,689 ±268
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	7.9%±1.1 pp7.9%±1.1 pp4,105±570	7.4%±0.1 pp7.4%±0.1 pp201,851±4,036	▲ +0.5%▲ +0.5%	15/50
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	51.8%±8.1 pp4.1%±0.6 pp2,127±331	52.4%±0.7 pp3.9%±0.1 pp105,720±1,511	▼ -0.6%▲ +0.2%	34/5017/50
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	48.2%±6.3 pp3.8%±0.5 pp1,979±260	47.6%±1.2 pp3.5%±0.1 pp96,131±2,437	▲ +0.6%▲ +0.3%	17/5014/50
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	58.9%±8.2 pp4.7%±0.6 pp2,417±335	67.0%±1.0 pp5.0%±0.1 pp135,301±1,945	▼ -8.2%▼ -0.3%	39/5020/50
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	41.1%±6.5 pp3.3%±0.5 pp1,689±268	33.0%±1.2 pp2.5%±0.1 pp66,550±2,459	▲ +8.2%▲ +0.8%	12/5014/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category	Ward 11
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	2.5% ±2.3 pp183 ±171
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	1.1% ±1.5 pp47 ±62
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	2.5%±2.3 pp183±171	5.9%±0.5 pp—	▼ -3.4%	37/50
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	1.1%±1.5 pp47±62	5.4%±0.6 pp—	▼ -4.3%	48/50
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category	Ward 11
Owner-Occupied Households	50.0% ±2.5 pp10,741 ±535
Renter-Occupied Households	50.0% ±3.0 pp10,730 ±647
Owner-Occupied Residents	56.3% ±2.8 pp29,156 ±1,436
Renter-Occupied Residents	43.7% ±3.1 pp22,622 ±1,611
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Owner-Occupied Households	50.0%±2.5 pp10,741±535	46.0%±0.4 pp534,012±4,939	▲ +4.0%	18/50
Renter-Occupied Households	50.0%±3.0 pp10,730±647	54.0%±0.4 pp626,193±5,183	▼ -4.0%	33/50
Owner-Occupied Residents	56.3%±2.8 pp29,156±1,436	51.8%±0.5 pp1,377,219±13,574	▲ +4.5%	16/50
Renter-Occupied Residents	43.7%±3.1 pp22,622±1,611	48.2%±0.5 pp1,280,665±13,500	▼ -4.5%	35/50
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category	Ward 11
Median Year Moved In	2013±0.7 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later	4.7% ±1.2 pp1,001 ±255
Moved in 2020 to 2022	18.3% ±2.1 pp3,925 ±449
Moved in 2010 to 2019	39.3% ±3.6 pp8,437 ±771
Moved in 2000 to 2009	20.0% ±2.6 pp4,291 ±549
Moved in 1990 to 1999	7.1% ±1.4 pp1,519 ±300
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	10.6% ±1.6 pp2,279 ±353
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Moved In	2013±0.7 yr	2015±1.0 yr	▼ −2	25/50
Moved in 2023 or Later	4.7%±1.2 pp1,001±255	5.9%±0.2 pp68,884±2,742	▼ -1.3%	28/50
Moved in 2020 to 2022	18.3%±2.1 pp3,925±449	24.1%±0.4 pp279,417±5,059	▼ -5.8%	31/50
Moved in 2010 to 2019	39.3%±3.6 pp8,437±771	39.2%±0.5 pp455,125±5,772	▲ +0.1%	27/50
Moved in 2000 to 2009	20.0%±2.6 pp4,291±549	13.8%±0.3 pp160,353±3,324	▲ +6.2%	6/50
Moved in 1990 to 1999	7.1%±1.4 pp1,519±300	8.2%±0.2 pp95,243±2,390	▼ -1.1%	33/50
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	10.6%±1.6 pp2,279±353	8.7%±0.2 pp101,183±2,362	▲ +1.9%	20/50
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 11
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	10.2% ±1.8 pp10.2%±1.8 pp5,258 ±913
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	6.8% ±1.5 pp66.9%±8.4 pp3,519 ±753
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	0.2% ±0.2 pp2.2%±1.6 pp115 ±87
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	1.4% ±0.6 pp14.2%±5.1 pp745 ±298
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	1.7% ±0.9 pp16.7%±7.8 pp879 ±439
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	10.2%±1.8 pp10.2%±1.8 pp5,258±913	14.0%±0.3 pp14.0%±0.3 pp375,475±8,289	▼ -3.8%▼ -3.8%	30/50
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	6.8%±1.5 pp66.9%±8.4 pp3,519±753	9.8%±0.3 pp69.9%±1.0 pp262,365±6,953	▼ -2.9%▼ -2.9%	36/5041/50
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	0.2%±0.2 pp2.2%±1.6 pp115±87	0.8%±0.1 pp5.5%±0.4 pp20,552±1,626	▼ -0.5%▼ -3.3%	37/5038/50
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	1.4%±0.6 pp14.2%±5.1 pp745±298	2.5%±0.1 pp17.6%±0.7 pp65,936±2,918	▼ -1.0%▼ -3.4%	24/5019/50
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	1.7%±0.9 pp16.7%±7.8 pp879±439	1.0%±0.1 pp7.1%±0.8 pp26,622±3,040	▲ +0.7%▲ +9.6%	7/504/50
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 11
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	6.5% ±1.2 pp6.5%±1.2 pp1,492 ±285
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	1.7% ±0.7 pp26.4%±10.2 pp394 ±170
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.2% ±0.3 pp2.7%±4.9 pp41 ±73
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.3% ±0.3 pp4.0%±4.8 pp59 ±73
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	4.4% ±1.1 pp66.8%±11.3 pp997 ±254
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	3.5% ±1.5 pp3.5%±1.5 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	0.4% ±0.7 pp0.4%±0.7 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	6.5%±1.2 pp6.5%±1.2 pp1,492±285	9.1%±0.2 pp9.1%±0.2 pp116,849±2,682	▼ -2.6%▼ -2.6%	37/50
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	1.7%±0.7 pp26.4%±10.2 pp394±170	2.5%±0.1 pp27.1%±1.4 pp31,723±1,796	▼ -0.8%▼ -0.7%	33/5022/50
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.2%±0.3 pp2.7%±4.9 pp41±73	0.6%±0.1 pp6.0%±0.7 pp7,037±795	▼ -0.4%▼ -3.3%	42/5040/50
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.3%±0.3 pp4.0%±4.8 pp59±73	0.2%±0.0 pp2.4%±0.5 pp2,831±587	0%▲ +1.5%	14/5014/50
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	4.4%±1.1 pp66.8%±11.3 pp997±254	5.9%±0.3 pp64.4%±2.5 pp75,258±3,387	▼ -1.5%▲ +2.4%	33/5024/50
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	3.5%±1.5 pp3.5%±1.5 pp—	4.8%±0.3 pp4.8%±0.3 pp—	▼ -1.3%▼ -1.3%	36/50
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	0.4%±0.7 pp0.4%±0.7 pp—	1.3%±0.1 pp1.3%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.9%▼ -0.9%	42/50
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category	Ward 11
Median Year Built	1953±3 yr
Pre-1940	47.2% ±2.7 pp10,813 ±614
1940-2009	46.9% ±3.8 pp10,737 ±881
2010+	6.0% ±1.2 pp1,365 ±268
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Built	1953±3 yr	1953±1 yr	▼ −0 yrs	18/50
Pre-1940	47.2%±2.7 pp10,813±614	38.8%±0.4 pp495,715±4,678	▲ +8.4%	17/50
1940-2009	46.9%±3.8 pp10,737±881	54.9%±0.6 pp700,698±7,435	▼ -8.0%	36/50
2010+	6.0%±1.2 pp1,365±268	6.3%±0.2 pp80,641±2,725	▼ -0.4%	15/50
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category	Ward 11
Population Density	11,371 /sq mi±486/sq mi
Single-Family Homes	33.8% ±2.3 pp7,753 ±528
Buildings With 2–4 Units	43.9% ±3.5 pp10,064 ±791
Buildings With 5–19 Units	12.3% ±1.9 pp2,818 ±425
Buildings With 20 or More Units	9.7% ±1.8 pp2,226 ±410
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Population Density	11,371 /sq mi±486/sq mi	11,721 /sq mi±26/sq mi	▼ −350 /sq mi	32/50
Single-Family Homes	33.8%±2.3 pp7,753±528	29.2%±0.3 pp372,679±3,989	▲ +4.6%	23/50
Buildings With 2–4 Units	43.9%±3.5 pp10,064±791	27.4%±0.4 pp349,976±4,957	▲ +16.5%	13/50
Buildings With 5–19 Units	12.3%±1.9 pp2,818±425	16.2%±0.3 pp206,420±4,124	▼ -3.9%	33/50
Buildings With 20 or More Units	9.7%±1.8 pp2,226±410	27.0%±0.3 pp344,543±4,438	▼ -17.3%	26/50
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category	Ward 11
Studio	2.6% ±1.0 pp597 ±240
1 Bedroom	13.3% ±2.1 pp3,052 ±478
2 Bedrooms	31.8% ±2.6 pp7,295 ±592
3 Bedrooms	39.7% ±3.2 pp9,094 ±735
4 Bedrooms	9.0% ±1.3 pp2,073 ±309
5 or More Bedrooms	3.5% ±0.9 pp803 ±203
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Studio	2.6%±1.0 pp597±240	7.5%±0.3 pp95,749±3,205	▼ -4.9%	39/50
1 Bedroom	13.3%±2.1 pp3,052±478	20.1%±0.4 pp257,271±4,939	▼ -6.8%	30/50
2 Bedrooms	31.8%±2.6 pp7,295±592	33.1%±0.3 pp422,866±4,221	▼ -1.3%	32/50
3 Bedrooms	39.7%±3.2 pp9,094±735	26.1%±0.3 pp333,682±4,061	▲ +13.6%	7/50
4 Bedrooms	9.0%±1.3 pp2,073±309	9.0%±0.2 pp115,453±2,426	0%	28/50
5 or More Bedrooms	3.5%±0.9 pp803±203	4.1%±0.2 pp52,033±2,072	▼ -0.6%	31/50
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 11
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	4.2% ±1.3 pp4.2%±1.3 pp907 ±270
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	3.0% ±1.1 pp71.9%±13.4 pp652 ±229
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	1.2% ±0.7 pp28.1%±13.5 pp255 ±144
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	4.2%±1.3 pp4.2%±1.3 pp907±270	3.4%±0.2 pp3.4%±0.2 pp39,979±1,996	▲ +0.8%▲ +0.8%	16/50
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	3.0%±1.1 pp71.9%±13.4 pp652±229	2.0%±0.1 pp58.2%±2.3 pp23,276±1,493	▲ +1.0%▲ +13.7%	14/5014/50
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	1.2%±0.7 pp28.1%±13.5 pp255±144	1.4%±0.1 pp41.8%±2.6 pp16,703±1,328	▼ -0.3%▼ -13.7%	29/5037/50
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category	Ward 11
Natural Gas Heat	88.0% ±2.4 pp18,881 ±525
Electric Heat	9.1% ±1.8 pp1,957 ±383
Other Heating Source	2.9% ±1.4 pp615 ±295
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Natural Gas Heat	88.0%±2.4 pp18,881±525	77.5%±0.3 pp899,660±3,501	▲ +10.5%	17/50
Electric Heat	9.1%±1.8 pp1,957±383	18.0%±0.3 pp208,937±3,864	▼ -8.9%	32/50
Other Heating Source	2.9%±1.4 pp615±295	4.4%±0.2 pp51,603±2,173	▼ -1.6%	39/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show

Category	Ward 11
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	41.6% ±2.9 pp8,933 ±612
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	20.8% ±3.0 pp4,462 ±637
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	37.6% ±2.6 pp8,057 ±551
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	18.8% ±2.0 pp4,043 ±436
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	29.3% ±4.4 pp2,932 ±436
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	26.3% ±5.1 pp2,635 ±506
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	44.4% ±3.4 pp4,441 ±336
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	23.6% ±2.8 pp2,359 ±277
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	53.5% ±3.7 pp5,697 ±391
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	15.5% ±3.1 pp1,651 ±330
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	31.0% ±3.6 pp3,295 ±388
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	14.3% ±2.8 pp1,520 ±302
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	44.5% ±5.7 pp2,340 ±301
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	18.5% ±4.4 pp971 ±229
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	37.0% ±5.1 pp1,945 ±268
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	15.5% ±3.5 pp814 ±182
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage and a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	62.3% ±4.4 pp3,357 ±237
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	12.6% ±4.4 pp680 ±236
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	25.1% ±5.1 pp1,350 ±276
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	13.1% ±4.5 pp707 ±241
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage and with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	41.6%±2.9 pp8,933±612	24.9%±0.4 pp289,047±4,524	▲ +16.7%	16/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	20.8%±3.0 pp4,462±637	23.8%±0.4 pp276,514±4,291	▼ -3.0%	30/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	37.6%±2.6 pp8,057±551	45.6%±0.5 pp529,378±5,291	▼ -8.1%	29/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	18.8%±2.0 pp4,043±436	24.0%±0.4 pp278,684±4,167	▼ -5.2%	26/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	29.3%±4.4 pp2,932±436	26.4%±0.5 pp155,936±3,134	▲ +2.9%	20/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	26.3%±5.1 pp2,635±506	25.3%±0.5 pp149,215±2,939	▲ +1.1%	18/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	44.4%±3.4 pp4,441±336	48.3%±0.7 pp285,567±4,222	▼ -4.0%	35/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	23.6%±2.8 pp2,359±277	25.5%±0.6 pp150,346±3,554	▼ -1.9%	32/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	53.5%±3.7 pp5,697±391	51.6%±0.6 pp272,277±2,904	▲ +2.0%	18/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	15.5%±3.1 pp1,651±330	19.6%±0.5 pp103,661±2,759	▼ -4.1%	47/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	31.0%±3.6 pp3,295±388	28.8%±0.6 pp151,994±3,034	▲ +2.2%	19/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	14.3%±2.8 pp1,520±302	13.8%±0.4 pp73,053±2,233	▲ +0.4%	24/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	44.5%±5.7 pp2,340±301	42.8%±0.7 pp146,216±2,365	▲ +1.7%	16/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	18.5%±4.4 pp971±229	23.9%±0.7 pp81,659±2,408	▼ -5.4%	45/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	37.0%±5.1 pp1,945±268	33.3%±0.8 pp113,882±2,596	▲ +3.7%	21/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	15.5%±3.5 pp814±182	15.4%±0.5 pp52,632±1,873	▲ +0.1%	25/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage and a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	62.3%±4.4 pp3,357±237	67.7%±0.9 pp126,058±1,613	▼ -5.4%	42/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	12.6%±4.4 pp680±236	11.8%±0.7 pp22,000±1,275	▲ +0.8%	24/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	25.1%±5.1 pp1,350±276	20.5%±0.8 pp38,106±1,492	▲ +4.6%	11/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	13.1%±4.5 pp707±241	11.0%±0.6 pp20,421±1,202	▲ +2.2%	10/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage and with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category	Ward 11
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$528±$70
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$919±$46
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$1,359±$48
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,907±$51
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$2,748±$150
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$528±$70	$594±$11	▼ −$66	32/50
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$919±$46	$1,011±$8	▼ −$92	31/50
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$1,359±$48	$1,560±$10	▼ −$201	31/50
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,907±$51	$2,329±$13	▼ −$423	30/50
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$2,748±$150	Over $3,000	▼ −$252+	28/50
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$489 ±49	$526 ±62	$528 ±70	▲ +$39▲ +$2▲ +$37
Chicago citywide	$609 ±7	$606 ±7	$594 ±11	▼ −$15▼ −$12▼ −$2
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$369 ±37	$429 ±51	$528 ±70	▲ +$159▲ +$99▲ +$59
Chicago citywide	$459 ±6	$494 ±6	$594 ±11	▲ +$135▲ +$100▲ +$35
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$836 ±27	$884 ±26	$919 ±46	▲ +$83▲ +$35▲ +$48
Chicago citywide	$992 ±5	$1,001 ±5	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$19▲ +$10▲ +$9
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$631 ±21	$720 ±22	$919 ±46	▲ +$288▲ +$198▲ +$90
Chicago citywide	$748 ±3	$816 ±4	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$262▲ +$195▲ +$67
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,167 ±28	$1,196 ±30	$1,359 ±48	▲ +$193▲ +$163▲ +$29
Chicago citywide	$1,493 ±8	$1,523 ±6	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$67▲ +$37▲ +$29
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$881 ±21	$975 ±25	$1,359 ±48	▲ +$479▲ +$385▲ +$94
Chicago citywide	$1,127 ±6	$1,241 ±5	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$433▲ +$319▲ +$114
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,875 ±56	$1,828 ±68	$1,907 ±51	▲ +$32▲ +$78▼ −$47
Chicago citywide	$2,333 ±12	$2,326 ±10	$2,329 ±13	▼ −$4▲ +$3▼ −$7
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,415 ±43	$1,490 ±55	$1,907 ±51	▲ +$492▲ +$417▲ +$75
Chicago citywide	$1,761 ±9	$1,896 ±8	$2,329 ±13	▲ +$569▲ +$434▲ +$135
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$2,832 ±164	$2,748 ±150	—▼ −$84—
Chicago citywide	—	$3,316 ±20	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$2,308 ±134	$2,748 ±150	—▲ +$440—
Chicago citywide	—	$2,703 ±16	—	———

Rent

Rent measure

Category	Ward 11
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$1,329±$64
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$490±$171
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,001±$68
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$1,324±$68
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,739±$61
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$2,031±$119
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$1,329±$64	$1,613±$12	▼ −$284	34/50
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$490±$171	$696±$20	▼ −$206	38/50
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,001±$68	$1,043±$8	▼ −$41	28/50
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$1,324±$68	$1,440±$10	▼ −$116	27/50
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,739±$61	$2,021±$21	▼ −$282	28/50
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$2,031±$119	$2,738±$29	▼ −$707	30/50
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11
Average Rent	$1,149±$61
10th Percentile Rent	$388±$174
25th Percentile Rent	$847±$60
Median Rent	$1,119±$54
75th Percentile Rent	$1,503±$77
90th Percentile Rent	$1,905±$68
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent	$1,149±$61	$1,452±$11	▼ −$303	31/50
10th Percentile Rent	$388±$174	$564±$21	▼ −$177	38/50
25th Percentile Rent	$847±$60	$913±$7	▼ −$66	28/50
Median Rent	$1,119±$54	$1,262±$12	▼ −$143	30/50
75th Percentile Rent	$1,503±$77	$1,868±$13	▼ −$365	27/50
90th Percentile Rent	$1,905±$68	$2,528±$38	▼ −$623	29/50
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category	Ward 11
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,587±$60
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,344±$135
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,741±$105
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,347±$126
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$3,187±$195
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$3,998±$124
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,587±$60	$2,734±$24	▼ −$147	20/50
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,344±$135	$1,270±$14	▲ +$74	22/50
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,741±$105	$1,697±$14	▲ +$44	25/50
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,347±$126	$2,339±$17	▲ +$8	23/50
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$3,187±$195	$3,269±$31	▼ −$82	21/50
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$3,998±$124	Over $4,000	▼ −$2+	21/50
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,808 ±101	$2,655 ±101	$2,587 ±60	▼ −$221▼ −$68▼ −$153
Chicago citywide	$2,855 ±19	$2,793 ±23	$2,734 ±24	▼ −$121▼ −$60▼ −$61
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$2,119 ±76	$2,164 ±82	$2,587 ±60	▲ +$468▲ +$423▲ +$45
Chicago citywide	$2,154 ±14	$2,277 ±19	$2,734 ±24	▲ +$579▲ +$457▲ +$122
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,393 ±140	$1,430 ±161	$1,344 ±135	▼ −$49▼ −$86▲ +$37
Chicago citywide	$1,403 ±11	$1,356 ±11	$1,270 ±14	▼ −$133▼ −$86▼ −$47
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,051 ±106	$1,166 ±131	$1,344 ±135	▲ +$292▲ +$178▲ +$114
Chicago citywide	$1,059 ±8	$1,105 ±9	$1,270 ±14	▲ +$212▲ +$165▲ +$46
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,880 ±80	$1,858 ±85	$1,741 ±105	▼ −$139▼ −$117▼ −$22
Chicago citywide	$1,874 ±12	$1,800 ±12	$1,697 ±14	▼ −$177▼ −$103▼ −$74
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,419 ±60	$1,514 ±70	$1,741 ±105	▲ +$322▲ +$227▲ +$95
Chicago citywide	$1,414 ±9	$1,467 ±10	$1,697 ±14	▲ +$283▲ +$230▲ +$53
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,540 ±102	$2,425 ±108	$2,347 ±126	▼ −$193▼ −$78▼ −$115
Chicago citywide	$2,526 ±13	$2,422 ±13	$2,339 ±17	▼ −$187▼ −$83▼ −$103
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,917 ±77	$1,976 ±88	$2,347 ±126	▲ +$430▲ +$371▲ +$59
Chicago citywide	$1,906 ±10	$1,974 ±11	$2,339 ±17	▲ +$433▲ +$365▲ +$68
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$3,363 ±174	$3,299 ±131	$3,187 ±195	▼ −$176▼ −$112▼ −$64
Chicago citywide	$3,447 ±25	$3,343 ±25	$3,269 ±31	▼ −$178▼ −$74▼ −$104
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$2,538 ±131	$2,688 ±107	$3,187 ±195	▲ +$649▲ +$498▲ +$151
Chicago citywide	$2,601 ±19	$2,724 ±20	$3,269 ±31	▲ +$668▲ +$544▲ +$123
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$4,188 ±319	$3,998 ±124	—▼ −$190—
Chicago citywide	—	$4,578 ±59	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	—	$3,413 ±260	$3,998 ±124	—▲ +$585—
Chicago citywide	—	$3,731 ±48	—	———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category	Ward 11
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$974±$52
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$510±$59
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$663±$45
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$923±$45
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,179±$57
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,495±$84
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$974±$52	$1,078±$22	▼ −$104	20/50
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$510±$59	$418±$8	▲ +$92	14/50
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$663±$45	$601±$8	▲ +$62	22/50
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$923±$45	$859±$10	▲ +$64	18/50
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,179±$57	$1,197±$18	▼ −$18	21/50
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$1,495±$84	Over $1,500	▼ −$5+	21/50
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$804 ±30	$908 ±28	$974 ±52	▲ +$170▲ +$66▲ +$104
Chicago citywide	$957 ±15	$1,028 ±10	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$121▲ +$50▲ +$71
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$606 ±23	$740 ±22	$974 ±52	▲ +$367▲ +$234▲ +$133
Chicago citywide	$722 ±11	$838 ±8	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$355▲ +$240▲ +$116
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$421 ±40	$510 ±48	$510 ±59	▲ +$90– $0▲ +$89
Chicago citywide	$429 ±6	$469 ±7	$418 ±8	▼ −$11▼ −$51▲ +$40
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$318 ±31	$416 ±39	$510 ±59	▲ +$193▲ +$95▲ +$98
Chicago citywide	$324 ±5	$382 ±5	$418 ±8	▲ +$95▲ +$36▲ +$59
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$572 ±38	$682 ±36	$663 ±45	▲ +$91▼ −$20▲ +$111
Chicago citywide	$586 ±6	$629 ±6	$601 ±8	▲ +$14▼ −$28▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$431 ±28	$556 ±29	$663 ±45	▲ +$231▲ +$107▲ +$125
Chicago citywide	$442 ±4	$513 ±5	$601 ±8	▲ +$158▲ +$88▲ +$70
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$759 ±30	$881 ±33	$923 ±45	▲ +$164▲ +$42▲ +$122
Chicago citywide	$815 ±9	$860 ±7	$859 ±10	▲ +$44▼ −$1▲ +$45
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$573 ±23	$718 ±27	$923 ±45	▲ +$350▲ +$205▲ +$145
Chicago citywide	$615 ±7	$701 ±6	$859 ±10	▲ +$244▲ +$158▲ +$86
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$1,079 ±40	$1,179 ±57	—▲ +$100—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,206 ±14	$1,197 ±18	—▼ −$9—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$880 ±32	$1,179 ±57	—▲ +$300—
Chicago citywide	—	$983 ±12	$1,197 ±18	—▲ +$214—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$1,319 ±95	$1,495 ±84	—▲ +$176—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,767 ±35	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$1,075 ±77	$1,495 ±84	—▲ +$420—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,440 ±28	—	———

Home Values

Category	Ward 11
Average Home Value	$430,909±$18,667
10th Percentile Home Value	$205,261±$19,858
25th Percentile Home Value	$299,069±$17,777
Median Home Value	$396,720±$16,058
75th Percentile Home Value	$570,726±$30,428
90th Percentile Home Value	$730,269±$26,502
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Average Home Value	$430,909±$18,667	$437,638±$7,358	▼ −$6,729	19/50
10th Percentile Home Value	$205,261±$19,858	$129,150±$3,756	▲ +$76,110	17/50
25th Percentile Home Value	$299,069±$17,777	$217,800±$1,804	▲ +$81,269	16/50
Median Home Value	$396,720±$16,058	$334,100±$2,424	▲ +$62,620	16/50
75th Percentile Home Value	$570,726±$30,428	$497,700±$3,730	▲ +$73,026	18/50
90th Percentile Home Value	$730,269±$26,502	$809,159±$15,691	▼ −$78,891	20/50
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$358,776 ±13,095	$417,925 ±37,011	$430,909 ±18,667	▲ +$72,133▲ +$12,984▲ +$59,149
Chicago citywide	$386,614 ±5,106	$424,380 ±4,754	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$51,024▲ +$13,258▲ +$37,766
Average Home Value (nominal dollars)	$270,762 ±9,883	$340,609 ±30,164	$430,909 ±18,667	▲ +$160,147▲ +$90,300▲ +$69,847
Chicago citywide	$291,771 ±3,853	$345,871 ±3,874	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$145,867▲ +$91,768▲ +$54,099
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$152,539 ±21,021	$186,748 ±24,746	$205,261 ±19,858	▲ +$52,722▲ +$18,512▲ +$34,210
Chicago citywide	$115,330 ±1,421	$124,313 ±1,339	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$13,821▲ +$4,838▲ +$8,983
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$115,118 ±15,864	$152,200 ±20,168	$205,261 ±19,858	▲ +$90,142▲ +$53,060▲ +$37,082
Chicago citywide	$87,037 ±1,072	$101,315 ±1,091	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$42,113▲ +$27,835▲ +$14,278
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$256,049 ±14,406	$271,658 ±11,035	$299,069 ±17,777	▲ +$43,020▲ +$27,411▲ +$15,609
Chicago citywide	$190,543 ±2,400	$199,018 ±1,255	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$27,257▲ +$18,782▲ +$8,475
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$193,236 ±10,872	$221,402 ±8,994	$299,069 ±17,777	▲ +$105,833▲ +$77,668▲ +$28,166
Chicago citywide	$143,800 ±1,811	$162,200 ±1,023	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$74,000▲ +$55,600▲ +$18,400
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$347,696 ±10,804	$369,034 ±13,294	$396,720 ±16,058	▲ +$49,024▲ +$27,686▲ +$21,338
Chicago citywide	$299,066 ±2,120	$316,564 ±2,118	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$35,034▲ +$17,536▲ +$17,498
Median Home Value (nominal dollars)	$262,401 ±8,154	$300,764 ±10,834	$396,720 ±16,058	▲ +$134,319▲ +$95,956▲ +$38,363
Chicago citywide	$225,700 ±1,600	$258,000 ±1,726	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$108,400▲ +$76,100▲ +$32,300
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$471,512 ±14,075	$510,511 ±21,960	$570,726 ±30,428	▲ +$99,214▲ +$60,215▲ +$38,999
Chicago citywide	$466,951 ±3,138	$490,797 ±3,892	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$30,749▲ +$6,903▲ +$23,846
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$355,842 ±10,622	$416,067 ±17,898	$570,726 ±30,428	▲ +$214,884▲ +$154,659▲ +$60,225
Chicago citywide	$352,400 ±2,368	$400,000 ±3,172	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$145,300▲ +$97,700▲ +$47,600
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$631,862 ±35,274	$709,445 ±56,577	$730,269 ±26,502	▲ +$98,406▲ +$20,824▲ +$77,582
Chicago citywide	$739,174 ±12,945	$835,769 ±9,047	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$69,986▼ −$26,610▲ +$96,595
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$476,856 ±26,620	$578,198 ±46,111	$730,269 ±26,502	▲ +$253,412▲ +$152,070▲ +$101,342
Chicago citywide	$557,842 ±9,770	$681,153 ±7,373	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$251,317▲ +$128,006▲ +$123,311

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 11
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	5.1%5.1%1,159
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	1.2%23.2%269
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	2.2%44.4%515
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	1.2%24.5%284
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.4%7.8%90
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	5.1%5.1%1,159	8.3%8.3%106,578	▼ -3.3%▼ -3.3%	26/50
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	1.2%23.2%269	4.8%57.2%60,910	▼ -3.6%▼ -33.9%	39/5047/50
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	2.2%44.4%515	1.1%13.8%14,721	▲ +1.1%▲ +30.6%	8/503/50
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	1.2%24.5%284	2.1%25.7%27,383	▼ -0.9%▼ -1.2%	22/5020/50
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.4%7.8%90	0.3%3.3%3,564	▲ +0.1%▲ +4.4%	16/505/50
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units	5.6%1,181	5.2%1,119	5.1%1,159	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −22▼ −0.2 pp▲ +40▼ −0.4 pp▼ −62
Chicago citywide	8.8%104,550	8.5%103,479	8.3%106,578	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,028▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,099▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,071
Housing Choice Vouchers	0.5%101	1.1%240	1.2%269	▲ +0.7 pp▲ +168– 0.0 pp▲ +29▲ +0.6 pp▲ +139
Chicago citywide	4.3%51,601	4.6%55,987	4.8%60,910	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +9,309▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,923▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,386
Public Housing	3.4%708	2.4%506	2.2%515	▼ −1.1 pp▼ −193▼ −0.1 pp▲ +9▼ −1.0 pp▼ −202
Chicago citywide	1.8%21,159	1.3%16,094	1.2%14,721	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −6,438▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,373▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,065
Project-Based Section 8	1.3%282	1.3%283	1.2%284	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1– 0.0 pp▲ +1
Chicago citywide	2.2%25,940	2.2%26,951	2.1%27,383	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,443▼ −0.1 pp▲ +432– 0.0 pp▲ +1,011
Other Project-Based Programs	0.4%90	0.4%90	0.4%90	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,850	0.4%4,447	0.3%3,564	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,286▼ −0.1 pp▼ −883▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,403

Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category	Ward 11
Average Household Income	$14,122
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$341
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,531
Below 30% of Area Median Income	93.2%963
With Children	7.5%77
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	38.3%396
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this ward. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this ward. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this ward.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$14,122	$17,032	▼ -$2,910	50/50
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$341	$425	▼ -$84	50/50
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,531	$1,389	▲ +$142	8/50
Below 30% of Area Median Income	93.2%963	83.0%77,427	▲ +10.2 pp	1/50
With Children	7.5%77	31.0%28,919	▼ -23.5 pp	48/50
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	38.3%396	32.0%29,852	▲ +6.3 pp	13/50
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this ward. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this ward. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this ward.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income	$10,781	$11,610	$14,121	▲ +$3,340▲ +$2,511▲ +$828
Chicago citywide	$12,156	$13,665	$17,032	▲ +$4,876▲ +$3,367▲ +$1,509
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$249	$276	$341	▲ +$92▲ +$66▲ +$27
Chicago citywide	$310	$340	$425	▲ +$115▲ +$85▲ +$30
Average Monthly Government Spending	$946	$1,110	$1,531	▲ +$586▲ +$421▲ +$165
Chicago citywide	$916	$1,017	$1,389	▲ +$473▲ +$372▲ +$101
Below 30% of Area Median Income	89.5%—	91.5%—	93.2%—	▲ +3.7 pp—▲ +1.7 pp—▲ +2.0 pp—
Chicago citywide	80.0%—	81.0%—	83.0%—	▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +2.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children	—	—	7.6%—	——————
Chicago citywide	—	—	31.0%—	——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	32.9%—	18.1%—	38.4%—	▲ +5.5 pp—▲ +20.3 pp—▼ −14.9 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category	Ward 11
Total Tree Canopy	10.1%241 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	79.1%1,883 acres
Natural Open Surfaces	10.8%257 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Total Tree Canopy	10.1%241 acres	18.4%25,934 acres	▼ -8.3%	46/50
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	79.1%1,883 acres	60.2%84,955 acres	▲ +18.9%	2/50
Natural Open Surfaces	10.8%257 acres	21.5%30,331 acres	▼ -10.7%	39/50
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category	Ward 11
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	25.5% ±3.5 pp13,247 ±1,812
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	43.4% ±3.8 pp22,522 ±1,975
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	31.1% ±3.3 pp16,137 ±1,727
Homes Without Air Conditioning	2.8%1,433
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	25.5%±3.5 pp13,247±1,812	26.1%±0.5 pp708,175±13,883	▼ -0.6%	24/50
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	43.4%±3.8 pp22,522±1,975	44.1%±0.6 pp1,195,501±15,477	▼ -0.7%	26/50
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	31.1%±3.3 pp16,137±1,727	29.8%±0.5 pp807,550±13,776	▲ +1.3%	23/50
Homes Without Air Conditioning	2.8%1,433	4.2%114,618	▼ -1.5%	38/50
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category	Ward 11
Drove Alone	55.2% ±3.0 pp12,574 ±674
Carpooled	16.5% ±2.4 pp3,759 ±543
Public Transit	17.5% ±2.3 pp3,988 ±516
Walked	6.3% ±1.7 pp1,425 ±395
Bikes	2.2% ±0.9 pp497 ±206
Other Commute Mode	0.6% ±0.4 pp138 ±102
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Drove Alone	55.2%±3.0 pp12,574±674	56.6%±0.4 pp772,696±5,998	▼ -1.4%	33/50
Carpooled	16.5%±2.4 pp3,759±543	9.3%±0.3 pp126,918±3,980	▲ +7.2%	5/50
Public Transit	17.5%±2.3 pp3,988±516	22.4%±0.4 pp305,691±6,011	▼ -4.9%	33/50
Walked	6.3%±1.7 pp1,425±395	7.3%±0.3 pp100,269±3,456	▼ -1.1%	16/50
Bikes	2.2%±0.9 pp497±206	1.8%±0.1 pp24,441±1,693	▲ +0.4%	19/50
Other Commute Mode	0.6%±0.4 pp138±102	2.5%±0.1 pp34,356±1,772	▼ -1.9%	47/50
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category	Ward 11
Average Commute Time (minutes)	30 min±0.8 min
Less Than 15 Minutes	15.7% ±2.1 pp3,603 ±481
15–29 Minutes	37.6% ±3.2 pp8,624 ±744
30–44 Minutes	26.6% ±2.3 pp6,104 ±539
45–59 Minutes	10.0% ±1.8 pp2,290 ±414
60 Minutes or More	10.1% ±1.6 pp2,309 ±360
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes)	30 min±0.8 min	33 min±0.2 min	▼ −3 min	41/50
Less Than 15 Minutes	15.7%±2.1 pp3,603±481	13.0%±0.3 pp140,252±3,438	▲ +2.7%	12/50
15–29 Minutes	37.6%±3.2 pp8,624±744	29.9%±0.5 pp322,586±5,056	▲ +7.7%	8/50
30–44 Minutes	26.6%±2.3 pp6,104±539	29.6%±0.4 pp318,782±4,584	▼ -3.0%	41/50
45–59 Minutes	10.0%±1.8 pp2,290±414	14.0%±0.3 pp151,451±3,075	▼ -4.1%	44/50
60 Minutes or More	10.1%±1.6 pp2,309±360	13.4%±0.3 pp144,940±3,715	▼ -3.4%	41/50
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category	Ward 11
Average Vehicles per Household	1.18±0.06
Households With No Vehicle	22.8% ±2.9 pp4,885 ±625
Households With 1 Vehicle	45.0% ±2.9 pp9,654 ±614
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	32.2% ±2.5 pp6,912 ±544
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Average Vehicles per Household	1.18±0.06	1.12±0.01	▲ +0.06	25/50
Households With No Vehicle	22.8%±2.9 pp4,885±625	26.6%±0.4 pp308,497±5,087	▼ -3.8%	27/50
Households With 1 Vehicle	45.0%±2.9 pp9,654±614	45.2%±0.4 pp524,900±5,145	▼ -0.2%	25/50
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	32.2%±2.5 pp6,912±544	28.2%±0.4 pp326,808±4,200	▲ +4.1%	20/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Ward 11 Residents Work

Category	Ward 11
Loop	20.3%4,808
Armour Square	7.6%1,790
Near North Side	7.4%1,741
Near West Side	6.1%1,440
Bridgeport	3.3%774
All other city neighborhoods	24.2%5,730
Outside the city	31.1%7,360
↳ Morton Grove village, IL	1.6%378
↳ Naperville city, IL	0.8%191
↳ Schaumburg village, IL	0.7%172
↳ Des Plaines city, IL	0.6%147
↳ Cicero town, IL	0.6%135
↳ All other Illinois locations	24.3%5,738
Out of state	2.5%599
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for ward 11 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference
Loop	20.3%4,808	21.5%259,168	▼ -1.2%
Armour Square	7.6%1,790	0.4%5,023	▲ +7.2%
Near North Side	7.4%1,741	9.1%109,334	▼ -1.7%
Near West Side	6.1%1,440	6.7%80,119	▼ -0.6%
Bridgeport	3.3%774	0.3%3,276	▲ +3.0%
All other city neighborhoods	24.2%5,730	21.1%253,663	▲ +3.2%
Outside the city	31.1%7,360	35.9%432,365	▼ -4.8%
↳ Morton Grove village, IL	1.6%378	0.3%3,510	▲ +1.3%
↳ Naperville city, IL	0.8%191	0.6%6,926	▲ +0.2%
↳ Schaumburg village, IL	0.7%172	0.9%10,377	▼ -0.1%
↳ Des Plaines city, IL	0.6%147	0.8%9,268	▼ -0.1%
↳ Cicero town, IL	0.6%135	0.5%6,087	▲ +0.1%
↳ All other Illinois locations	24.3%5,738	27.4%330,297	▼ -3.2%
Out of state	2.5%599	2.2%26,136	▲ +0.4%
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for ward 11 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Loop	20.0%4,271	19.1%4,505	20.3%4,808	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +537▲ +1.2 pp▲ +303▼ −0.8 pp▲ +234
Chicago citywide	20.0%224,635	21.0%252,791	21.5%259,168	▲ +1.5 pp▲ +34,533▲ +0.5 pp▲ +6,377▲ +1.0 pp▲ +28,156
Armour Square	7.2%1,537	7.2%1,702	7.6%1,790	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +253▲ +0.3 pp▲ +88– 0.0 pp▲ +165
Chicago citywide	0.4%4,268	0.4%4,703	0.4%5,023	– 0.0 pp▲ +755– 0.0 pp▲ +320– 0.0 pp▲ +435
Near North Side	6.6%1,422	8.0%1,873	7.4%1,741	▲ +0.7 pp▲ +319▼ −0.6 pp▼ −132▲ +1.3 pp▲ +451
Chicago citywide	8.2%92,142	9.4%112,858	9.1%109,334	▲ +0.9 pp▲ +17,192▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3,524▲ +1.2 pp▲ +20,716
Near West Side	6.5%1,381	6.6%1,558	6.1%1,440	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +59▼ −0.5 pp▼ −118▲ +0.2 pp▲ +177
Chicago citywide	6.2%69,083	6.6%79,757	6.7%80,119	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +11,036– 0.0 pp▲ +362▲ +0.5 pp▲ +10,674
Bridgeport	3.5%743	3.7%870	3.3%774	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +31▼ −0.4 pp▼ −96▲ +0.2 pp▲ +127
Chicago citywide	0.3%3,192	0.3%3,477	0.3%3,276	– 0.0 pp▲ +84– 0.0 pp▼ −201– 0.0 pp▲ +285
All other city neighborhoods	25.9%5,538	24.3%5,723	24.2%5,730	▼ −1.7 pp▲ +192▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7▼ −1.6 pp▲ +185
Chicago citywide	22.9%257,015	21.5%259,132	21.1%253,663	▼ −1.8 pp▼ −3,352▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,469▼ −1.4 pp▲ +2,117
Outside the city	30.4%6,494	31.0%7,305	31.1%7,360	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +866▲ +0.1 pp▲ +55▲ +0.7 pp▲ +811
Chicago citywide	36.8%412,807	35.7%430,135	35.9%432,365	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +19,558▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,230▼ −1.0 pp▲ +17,328
Morton Grove village, IL	0.2%36	0.4%102	1.6%378	▲ +1.4 pp▲ +342▲ +1.2 pp▲ +276▲ +0.3 pp▲ +66
Chicago citywide	0.2%2,316	0.2%2,644	0.3%3,510	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,194▲ +0.1 pp▲ +866– 0.0 pp▲ +328
Naperville city, IL	0.6%119	0.8%185	0.8%191	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +72– 0.0 pp▲ +6▲ +0.2 pp▲ +66
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,765	0.5%6,098	0.6%6,926	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,161▲ +0.1 pp▲ +828– 0.0 pp▲ +333
Schaumburg village, IL	0.9%187	0.8%185	0.7%172	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −15▼ −0.1 pp▼ −13▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2
Chicago citywide	1.1%11,818	1.0%11,930	0.9%10,377	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,441▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,553▼ −0.1 pp▲ +112
Des Plaines city, IL	0.9%183	0.7%162	0.6%147	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −36▼ −0.1 pp▼ −15▼ −0.2 pp▼ −21
Chicago citywide	0.8%9,241	0.8%9,141	0.8%9,268	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +27– 0.0 pp▲ +127▼ −0.1 pp▼ −100
Cicero town, IL	0.5%105	0.6%147	0.6%135	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +30▼ −0.1 pp▼ −12▲ +0.1 pp▲ +42
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,256	0.5%6,120	0.5%6,087	– 0.0 pp▲ +831– 0.0 pp▼ −33– 0.0 pp▲ +864
All other Illinois locations	24.3%5,201	24.5%5,766	24.3%5,738	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +537▼ −0.2 pp▼ −28▲ +0.2 pp▲ +565
Chicago citywide	28.0%314,112	27.1%326,235	27.4%330,297	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +16,185▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,062▼ −0.9 pp▲ +12,123
Out of state	2.4%515	2.9%677	2.5%599	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +84▼ −0.3 pp▼ −78▲ +0.5 pp▲ +162
Chicago citywide	2.2%24,577	2.3%27,198	2.2%26,136	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,559▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,062▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,621

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Ward 11

Category	Ward 11
Bridgeport	8.4%1,698
Armour Square	4.3%867
Brighton Park	3.9%790
New City (Back of the Yards)	3.2%637
McKinley Park	3.0%602
All other city neighborhoods	38.4%7,757
Outside the city	38.9%7,868
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL	1.1%225
↳ Cicero town, IL	1.0%207
↳ Aurora city, IL	0.8%161
↳ Berwyn city, IL	0.8%161
↳ Naperville city, IL	0.7%147
↳ All other Illinois locations	30.8%6,219
Out of state	3.7%748
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in ward 11; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference
Bridgeport	8.4%1,698	0.7%10,850	▲ +7.7%
Armour Square	4.3%867	0.3%3,849	▲ +4.0%
Brighton Park	3.9%790	0.6%9,100	▲ +3.3%
New City (Back of the Yards)	3.2%637	0.6%8,500	▲ +2.6%
McKinley Park	3.0%602	0.3%4,443	▲ +2.7%
All other city neighborhoods	38.4%7,757	37.1%542,952	▲ +1.3%
Outside the city	38.9%7,868	47.2%691,556	▼ -8.3%
↳ Oak Lawn village, IL	1.1%225	0.7%9,767	▲ +0.4%
↳ Cicero town, IL	1.0%207	0.8%10,993	▲ +0.3%
↳ Aurora city, IL	0.8%161	0.7%10,879	▲ +0.1%
↳ Berwyn city, IL	0.8%161	0.6%9,497	▲ +0.1%
↳ Naperville city, IL	0.7%147	0.9%13,352	▼ -0.2%
↳ All other Illinois locations	30.8%6,219	37.0%540,957	▼ -6.2%
Out of state	3.7%748	4.9%72,124	▼ -1.2%
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in ward 11; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Bridgeport	8.2%1,559	9.3%1,736	8.4%1,698	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +139▼ −0.9 pp▼ −38▲ +1.1 pp▲ +177
Chicago citywide	0.7%9,815	0.8%10,783	0.7%10,850	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,035– 0.0 pp▲ +67– 0.0 pp▲ +968
Armour Square	4.3%824	5.0%934	4.3%867	– 0.0 pp▲ +43▼ −0.7 pp▼ −67▲ +0.7 pp▲ +110
Chicago citywide	0.3%3,560	0.3%3,870	0.3%3,849	– 0.0 pp▲ +289– 0.0 pp▼ −21– 0.0 pp▲ +310
Brighton Park	3.4%640	3.9%720	3.9%790	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +150▲ +0.1 pp▲ +70▲ +0.5 pp▲ +80
Chicago citywide	0.6%8,222	0.7%9,275	0.6%9,100	– 0.0 pp▲ +878– 0.0 pp▼ −175– 0.0 pp▲ +1,053
New City (Back of the Yards)	3.2%604	3.2%597	3.2%637	– 0.0 pp▲ +33– 0.0 pp▲ +40– 0.0 pp▼ −7
Chicago citywide	0.6%8,047	0.6%8,424	0.6%8,500	– 0.0 pp▲ +453– 0.0 pp▲ +76– 0.0 pp▲ +377
McKinley Park	2.8%526	2.8%525	3.0%602	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +76▲ +0.2 pp▲ +77▲ +0.1 pp▼ −1
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,267	0.3%4,575	0.3%4,443	– 0.0 pp▲ +176– 0.0 pp▼ −132– 0.0 pp▲ +308
All other city neighborhoods	41.8%7,977	39.5%7,380	38.4%7,757	▼ −3.5 pp▼ −220▼ −1.2 pp▲ +377▼ −2.3 pp▼ −597
Chicago citywide	38.3%503,539	38.2%541,560	37.1%542,952	▼ −1.2 pp▲ +39,413▼ −1.1 pp▲ +1,392▼ −0.1 pp▲ +38,021
Outside the city	36.4%6,939	36.3%6,783	38.9%7,868	▲ +2.5 pp▲ +929▲ +2.6 pp▲ +1,085▼ −0.1 pp▼ −156
Chicago citywide	45.9%603,753	45.4%642,891	47.2%691,556	▲ +1.3 pp▲ +87,803▲ +1.9 pp▲ +48,665▼ −0.6 pp▲ +39,138
Oak Lawn village, IL	1.3%247	1.0%194	1.1%225	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −22▲ +0.1 pp▲ +31▼ −0.3 pp▼ −53
Chicago citywide	0.7%9,277	0.7%9,503	0.7%9,767	– 0.0 pp▲ +490– 0.0 pp▲ +264– 0.0 pp▲ +226
Cicero town, IL	1.3%241	1.2%225	1.0%207	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −34▼ −0.2 pp▼ −18▼ −0.1 pp▼ −16
Chicago citywide	0.8%9,934	0.8%11,086	0.8%10,993	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,059– 0.0 pp▼ −93– 0.0 pp▲ +1,152
Aurora city, IL	0.5%102	0.6%117	0.8%161	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +59▲ +0.2 pp▲ +44▲ +0.1 pp▲ +15
Chicago citywide	0.7%9,006	0.7%10,248	0.7%10,879	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,873– 0.0 pp▲ +631– 0.0 pp▲ +1,242
Berwyn city, IL	0.7%139	0.7%134	0.8%161	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +22▲ +0.1 pp▲ +27– 0.0 pp▼ −5
Chicago citywide	0.7%8,732	0.7%9,219	0.6%9,497	– 0.0 pp▲ +765– 0.0 pp▲ +278– 0.0 pp▲ +487
Naperville city, IL	0.6%117	0.6%114	0.7%147	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +30▲ +0.1 pp▲ +33– 0.0 pp▼ −3
Chicago citywide	0.8%10,439	0.8%11,676	0.9%13,352	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,913▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,676– 0.0 pp▲ +1,237
All other Illinois locations	28.3%5,392	28.6%5,344	30.8%6,219	▲ +2.5 pp▲ +827▲ +2.1 pp▲ +875▲ +0.3 pp▼ −48
Chicago citywide	35.6%467,892	35.1%497,967	37.0%540,957	▲ +1.4 pp▲ +73,065▲ +1.8 pp▲ +42,990▼ −0.5 pp▲ +30,075
Out of state	3.5%671	3.5%655	3.7%748	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +77▲ +0.2 pp▲ +93– 0.0 pp▼ −16
Chicago citywide	4.9%63,789	4.8%68,287	4.9%72,124	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8,335▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,837– 0.0 pp▲ +4,498

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category	Ward 11
No Computer or Smartphone	5.2% ±1.2 pp1,109 ±265
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	12.0% ±2.1 pp2,573 ±453
Desktop or Laptop Available	78.9% ±2.4 pp16,917 ±521
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
No Computer or Smartphone	5.2%±1.2 pp1,109±265	5.1%±0.2 pp58,709±2,246	▲ +0.1%	26/50
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	12.0%±2.1 pp2,573±453	10.4%±0.3 pp120,218±3,642	▲ +1.6%	21/50
Desktop or Laptop Available	78.9%±2.4 pp16,917±521	79.7%±0.4 pp924,956±4,919	▼ -0.9%	24/50
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category	Ward 11
Has Internet Access	92.9% ±2.0 pp19,933 ±435
Cellular Data Plan Only	14.7% ±2.2 pp3,148 ±472
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	1.7% ±0.8 pp358 ±174
No Internet Access	7.1% ±1.5 pp1,519 ±325
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Has Internet Access	92.9%±2.0 pp19,933±435	93.1%±0.3 pp1,080,419±3,310	▼ -0.2%	26/50
Cellular Data Plan Only	14.7%±2.2 pp3,148±472	12.5%±0.3 pp145,219±3,463	▲ +2.2%	18/50
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	1.7%±0.8 pp358±174	3.9%±0.2 pp45,350±1,940	▼ -2.2%	46/50
No Internet Access	7.1%±1.5 pp1,519±325	6.9%±0.2 pp79,786±2,730	▲ +0.2%	25/50
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category	Ward 11
Uninsured Residents	8.0% ±1.1 pp4,142 ±578
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	2.7% ±1.7 pp1,382 ±905
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	10.5% ±1.5 pp5,452 ±785
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	4.2% ±2.4 pp2,187 ±1,252
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Uninsured Residents	8.0%±1.1 pp4,142±578	9.8%±0.2 pp264,391±5,512	▼ -1.8%	34/50
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	2.7%±1.7 pp1,382±905	3.9%±0.3 pp104,687±8,689	▼ -1.2%	35/50
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	10.5%±1.5 pp5,452±785	13.3%±0.3 pp361,430±8,202	▼ -2.8%	35/50
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	4.2%±2.4 pp2,187±1,252	1.7%±0.3 pp46,718±7,559	▲ +2.5%	6/50
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category	Ward 11
Insured (Any Coverage)	92.0% ±1.1 pp47,687 ±577
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	48.4% ±2.2 pp25,100 ±1,117
Direct-Purchase Insurance	12.2% ±1.3 pp6,298 ±663
Medicare	15.4% ±1.5 pp7,991 ±788
Medicaid	23.1% ±2.1 pp11,994 ±1,062
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.5% ±0.4 pp244 ±184
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	3.6% ±0.8 pp1,881 ±403
Uninsured	8.0% ±1.1 pp4,136 ±577
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Insured (Any Coverage)	92.0%±1.1 pp47,687±577	90.2%±0.2 pp2,424,871±5,689	▲ +1.8%	17/50
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	48.4%±2.2 pp25,100±1,117	51.2%±0.4 pp1,376,912±9,468	▼ -2.8%	29/50
Direct-Purchase Insurance	12.2%±1.3 pp6,298±663	8.5%±0.2 pp227,424±5,112	▲ +3.7%	4/50
Medicare	15.4%±1.5 pp7,991±788	12.6%±0.2 pp339,804±4,911	▲ +2.8%	12/50
Medicaid	23.1%±2.1 pp11,994±1,062	22.2%±0.3 pp596,931±7,773	▲ +0.9%	24/50
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.5%±0.4 pp244±184	0.3%±0.0 pp7,201±787	▲ +0.2%	9/50
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	3.6%±0.8 pp1,881±403	3.8%±0.1 pp102,777±3,544	▼ -0.2%	25/50
Uninsured	8.0%±1.1 pp4,136±577	9.8%±0.2 pp262,018±5,689	▼ -1.8%	34/50
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category	Ward 11
Adults With at Least One Disability	13.3% ±1.6 pp5,744 ±683
Mobility Disability	6.5% ±1.1 pp2,791 ±489
Hearing Disability	4.0% ±0.9 pp1,720 ±406
Vision Disability	2.9% ±0.9 pp1,254 ±374
Cognitive Disability	4.9% ±1.1 pp2,136 ±467
Self-Care Disability	2.3% ±0.7 pp1,005 ±306
Independent Living Disability	6.2% ±1.2 pp2,662 ±501
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability	13.3%±1.6 pp5,744±683	14.0%±0.2 pp303,665±4,797	▼ -0.8%	27/50
Mobility Disability	6.5%±1.1 pp2,791±489	7.6%±0.2 pp163,666±3,398	▼ -1.1%	30/50
Hearing Disability	4.0%±0.9 pp1,720±406	2.8%±0.1 pp61,430±2,337	▲ +1.1%	6/50
Vision Disability	2.9%±0.9 pp1,254±374	3.0%±0.1 pp64,544±2,269	▼ -0.1%	22/50
Cognitive Disability	4.9%±1.1 pp2,136±467	5.2%±0.1 pp112,824±2,939	▼ -0.3%	26/50
Self-Care Disability	2.3%±0.7 pp1,005±306	2.7%±0.1 pp57,758±2,261	▼ -0.3%	31/50
Independent Living Disability	6.2%±1.2 pp2,662±501	5.7%±0.2 pp123,651±3,247	▲ +0.4%	21/50
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category	Ward 11
Arthritis	19.1%7,636
High Blood Pressure	29.6%11,847
Cancer	4.8%1,899
Current Asthma	8.3%3,325
Coronary Heart Disease	5.5%2,199
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	5.9%2,373
Diabetes	14.0%5,614
High Cholesterol	36.8%14,722
Obesity	24.8%9,904
Stroke	3.2%1,295
Lost All Natural Teeth	3.0%1,193
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Arthritis	19.1%7,636	19.6%409,178	▼ -0.5%	27/50
High Blood Pressure	29.6%11,847	29.7%620,030	▼ -0.1%	22/50
Cancer	4.8%1,899	5.0%104,382	▼ -0.2%	28/50
Current Asthma	8.3%3,325	10.2%212,940	▼ -1.9%	50/50
Coronary Heart Disease	5.5%2,199	4.8%100,207	▲ +0.7%	18/50
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	5.9%2,373	5.5%114,820	▲ +0.4%	18/50
Diabetes	14.0%5,614	12.0%250,517	▲ +2.0%	17/50
High Cholesterol	36.8%14,722	31.6%659,696	▲ +5.2%	1/50
Obesity	24.8%9,904	32.6%680,572	▼ -7.8%	44/50
Stroke	3.2%1,295	3.3%68,892	▼ -0.1%	21/50
Lost All Natural Teeth	3.0%1,193	2.5%52,249	▲ +0.5%	18/50
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category	Ward 11
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	15.1%6,041
Current Cigarette Smoking	12.8%5,120
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	29.0%11,594
Short Sleep Duration	37.2%14,868
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	15.1%6,041	19.0%396,652	▼ -3.9%	39/50
Current Cigarette Smoking	12.8%5,120	11.9%248,430	▲ +0.9%	18/50
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	29.0%11,594	24.7%515,648	▲ +4.3%	21/50
Short Sleep Duration	37.2%14,868	37.8%789,129	▼ -0.6%	25/50
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category	Ward 11
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	21.9%8,771
Frequent Physical Distress	12.0%4,800
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	21.9%8,771	21.1%440,493	▲ +0.8%	23/50
Frequent Physical Distress	12.0%4,800	11.8%246,342	▲ +0.2%	25/50
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category	Ward 11
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	74.0%29,565
Routine Checkup in Past Year	75.9%30,343
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	85.2%34,068
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	50.1%20,011
Dental Visit in Past Year	54.0%21,599
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	69.4%27,717
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	74.0%29,565	72.5%1,513,542	▲ +1.5%	15/50
Routine Checkup in Past Year	75.9%30,343	76.2%1,590,785	▼ -0.3%	24/50
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	85.2%34,068	86.2%1,799,549	▼ -1.0%	33/50
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	50.1%20,011	55.8%1,164,905	▼ -5.7%	41/50
Dental Visit in Past Year	54.0%21,599	58.4%1,219,184	▼ -4.4%	33/50
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	69.4%27,717	74.2%1,549,032	▼ -4.8%	46/50
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category	Ward 11
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	16.4%6,537
Frequent Mental Distress	14.3%5,703
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	31.5%12,608
Loneliness	36.4%14,560
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 11	City	Difference	Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	16.4%6,537	19.1%398,740	▼ -2.7%	50/50
Frequent Mental Distress	14.3%5,703	16.0%334,023	▼ -1.7%	39/50
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	31.5%12,608	28.2%588,716	▲ +3.3%	17/50
Loneliness	36.4%14,560	35.8%747,377	▲ +0.6%	21/50
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Compare All Wards

Chicago City Council Ward 11

Ward 11 at a Glance

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Age Distribution

Educational Attainment

Population

Household Size

Marital Status

Language Spoken at Home

English Proficiency

Household Composition

Children by Household Type

Veteran Status

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Poverty Status

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Occupation

Industry of Employment

Class of Worker

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Earnings of All Workers

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 11

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 11 in Lower-Income Families

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Ward 11

Local Businesses

Jobs in Ward 11

Industry of Jobs in Ward 11

Earnings of Jobs in Ward 11

Jobs in Ward 11 by Firm Age

Jobs in Ward 11 by Firm Size

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

College Enrollment

Student Digital Access

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Year Moved Into Current Home

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Housing Vacancy Status

Housing Age

Housing Units by Building Size

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Overcrowded Housing

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Monthly Housing Costs

Rent

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Home Values

Federal Housing Assistance

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Commute Time

Household Vehicle Access

Where Ward 11 Residents Work

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Ward 11

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Household Internet Access

Health

Health Insurance

Health Insurance Coverage Types