Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category	Ward 10
Hispanic	61.2% ±3.0 pp31,817 ±1,564
White	13.8% ±1.5 pp7,162 ±757
Black	23.7% ±3.0 pp12,297 ±1,533
Asian	0.3% ±0.3 pp177 ±135
Other or Multi-racial	1.0% ±0.4 pp503 ±213
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Hispanic	61.2%±3.0 pp31,817±1,564	29.7%±0.2 pp805,318±5,785	▲ +31.5%	10/50
White	13.8%±1.5 pp7,162±757	32.1%±0.2 pp870,127±5,557	▼ -18.3%	33/50
Black	23.7%±3.0 pp12,297±1,533	27.4%±0.2 pp743,710±6,047	▼ -3.8%	19/50
Asian	0.3%±0.3 pp177±135	7.2%±0.2 pp196,435±4,370	▼ -6.9%	49/50
Other or Multi-racial	1.0%±0.4 pp503±213	3.5%±0.1 pp95,636±3,778	▼ -2.6%	48/50
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Hispanic	59.3% ±2.7 pp33,002 ±1,501	60.9% ±2.3 pp33,388 ±1,276	61.2% ±3.0 pp31,817 ±1,564	▲ +1.9 pp▼ −1,185▲ +0.3 pp▼ −1,571▲ +1.6 pp▲ +386
Chicago citywide	28.9% ±0.2 pp785,292 ±4,750	28.8% ±0.2 pp780,167 ±5,832	29.7% ±0.2 pp805,318 ±5,785	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +20,026▲ +0.9 pp▲ +25,151▼ −0.2 pp▼ −5,125
White	16.1% ±1.2 pp8,985 ±667	13.5% ±1.4 pp7,392 ±748	13.8% ±1.5 pp7,162 ±757	▼ −2.4 pp▼ −1,823▲ +0.3 pp▼ −230▼ −2.7 pp▼ −1,593
Chicago citywide	32.2% ±0.2 pp872,513 ±4,319	33.3% ±0.2 pp901,769 ±4,468	32.1% ±0.2 pp870,127 ±5,557	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2,386▼ −1.2 pp▼ −31,642▲ +1.1 pp▲ +29,256
Black	24.0% ±2.0 pp13,369 ±1,092	25.0% ±1.8 pp13,702 ±986	23.7% ±3.0 pp12,297 ±1,533	▼ −0.4 pp▼ −1,072▼ −1.3 pp▼ −1,405▲ +1.0 pp▲ +333
Chicago citywide	31.5% ±0.1 pp853,214 ±3,755	29.2% ±0.2 pp790,893 ±4,690	27.4% ±0.2 pp743,710 ±6,047	▼ −4.0 pp▼ −109,504▼ −1.8 pp▼ −47,183▼ −2.3 pp▼ −62,321
Asian	0.2% ±0.2 pp84 ±84	0.3% ±0.2 pp179 ±127	0.3% ±0.3 pp177 ±135	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +93– 0.0 pp▼ −2▲ +0.2 pp▲ +95
Chicago citywide	5.7% ±0.1 pp154,287 ±2,942	6.5% ±0.1 pp177,195 ±3,532	7.2% ±0.2 pp196,435 ±4,370	▲ +1.6 pp▲ +42,148▲ +0.7 pp▲ +19,240▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,908
Other or Multi-racial	0.4% ±0.2 pp195 ±133	0.3% ±0.3 pp170 ±146	1.0% ±0.4 pp503 ±213	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +308▲ +0.7 pp▲ +333– 0.0 pp▼ −25
Chicago citywide	1.7% ±0.1 pp47,302 ±1,990	2.2% ±0.1 pp59,510 ±2,584	3.5% ±0.1 pp95,636 ±3,778	▲ +1.8 pp▲ +48,334▲ +1.3 pp▲ +36,126▲ +0.5 pp▲ +12,208

Age Distribution

Category	Ward 10
Under 5	5.3% ±1.0 pp2,764 ±509
5-17	23.5% ±1.8 pp12,227 ±933
18-24	8.3% ±1.0 pp4,338 ±527
25-44	26.7% ±1.5 pp13,850 ±801
45-64	21.3% ±1.1 pp11,051 ±592
65-74	9.4% ±1.0 pp4,872 ±503
75-84	3.4% ±0.6 pp1,772 ±296
85+	2.1% ±0.5 pp1,082 ±257
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Under 5	5.3%±1.0 pp2,764±509	5.3%±0.1 pp144,044±3,726	0%	28/50
5-17	23.5%±1.8 pp12,227±933	14.1%±0.2 pp381,582±5,292	▲ +9.5%	2/50
18-24	8.3%±1.0 pp4,338±527	9.6%±0.2 pp260,942±4,703	▼ -1.3%	34/50
25-44	26.7%±1.5 pp13,850±801	34.3%±0.2 pp929,946±6,124	▼ -7.6%	39/50
45-64	21.3%±1.1 pp11,051±592	22.9%±0.2 pp620,047±5,184	▼ -1.6%	37/50
65-74	9.4%±1.0 pp4,872±503	8.2%±0.1 pp221,932±3,538	▲ +1.2%	16/50
75-84	3.4%±0.6 pp1,772±296	4.0%±0.1 pp107,625±2,624	▼ -0.6%	34/50
85+	2.1%±0.5 pp1,082±257	1.7%±0.1 pp45,108±1,900	▲ +0.4%	14/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category	Ward 10
No High School Diploma	21.8% ±2.1 pp7,087 ±688
High School Diploma or GED	36.0% ±2.4 pp11,710 ±781
Some College or Associate's Degree	27.9% ±2.6 pp9,084 ±832
Bachelor's Degree	9.4% ±1.3 pp3,070 ±425
Graduate Degree	4.9% ±1.0 pp1,591 ±313
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
No High School Diploma	21.8%±2.1 pp7,087±688	12.8%±0.2 pp246,015±4,665	▲ +9.0%	10/50
High School Diploma or GED	36.0%±2.4 pp11,710±781	21.1%±0.3 pp405,248±5,594	▲ +14.9%	3/50
Some College or Associate's Degree	27.9%±2.6 pp9,084±832	21.8%±0.3 pp419,911±5,261	▲ +6.1%	15/50
Bachelor's Degree	9.4%±1.3 pp3,070±425	25.4%±0.3 pp488,467±5,561	▼ -15.9%	45/50
Graduate Degree	4.9%±1.0 pp1,591±313	19.0%±0.3 pp365,017±4,874	▼ -14.1%	46/50
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category	Ward 10
Total Population	51,955 ±2,879
Total Households	18,707 ±919
Population Density	2,511 ±139 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	Average Ward	Difference
Total Population	51,955	54,206	▼ −2,251
Total Households	18,707	23,200	▼ −4,493
Population Density	2,511 people/sq mi	16,281 people/sq mi	▼ −13,770
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average ward rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large wards. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19	Difference	Rank
Total Population	55,635 ±2,181	54,831 ±1,888	51,955 ±2,879	▼ −3,680 ±3,612▼ −2,876 ±3,443▼ −804 ±2,885	▲ +1,405▲ +665▼ −2,251	17/5025/5036/50
Average Ward	54,230	54,166	54,206	▼ −24▲ +40▼ −64
Total Households	17,207 ±436	18,033 ±427	18,707 ±919	▲ +1,500 ±1,017▲ +674 ±1,013▲ +826 ±610	▼ −3,361▼ −3,287▼ −4,493	42/5040/5042/50
Average Ward	20,568	21,320	23,200	▲ +2,631▲ +1,880▲ +751
Population Density (per sq mi)	2,689 ±105	2,650 ±91	2,511 ±139	▼ −178▼ −139▼ −39	▼ −13,227▼ −13,462▼ −13,770	50/5050/5050/50
Average Ward Density	15,916	16,112	16,281	▲ +366▲ +169▲ +196

Household Size

Category	Ward 10
Average Household Size	2.76±0.17
1-Person Households	31.3% ±2.9 pp5,857 ±550
2-Person Households	25.5% ±3.0 pp4,772 ±566
3-Person Households	14.3% ±1.8 pp2,666 ±341
4+ Person Households	28.9% ±2.8 pp5,411 ±522
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Size	2.76±0.17	2.29±0.02	▲ +0.47	10/50
1-Person Households	31.3%±2.9 pp5,857±550	39.7%±0.4 pp460,268±4,301	▼ -8.4%	32/50
2-Person Households	25.5%±3.0 pp4,772±566	29.5%±0.4 pp342,235±4,195	▼ -4.0%	38/50
3-Person Households	14.3%±1.8 pp2,666±341	12.9%±0.3 pp149,291±3,231	▲ +1.4%	27/50
4+ Person Households	28.9%±2.8 pp5,411±522	18.0%±0.3 pp208,411±4,023	▲ +11.0%	11/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category	Ward 10
Never Married	46.8% ±2.2 pp18,593 ±870
Married	36.5% ±1.3 pp14,497 ±531
Separated	2.8% ±0.8 pp1,116 ±329
Divorced	7.8% ±1.2 pp3,076 ±465
Widowed	6.1% ±0.9 pp2,408 ±364
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Never Married	46.8%±2.2 pp18,593±870	49.6%±0.3 pp1,130,286±6,623	▼ -2.8%	32/50
Married	36.5%±1.3 pp14,497±531	35.5%±0.3 pp807,294±6,077	▲ +1.1%	24/50
Separated	2.8%±0.8 pp1,116±329	2.2%±0.1 pp49,430±2,379	▲ +0.6%	13/50
Divorced	7.8%±1.2 pp3,076±465	7.9%±0.2 pp180,700±3,966	▼ -0.2%	26/50
Widowed	6.1%±0.9 pp2,408±364	4.8%±0.1 pp109,357±2,738	▲ +1.3%	13/50
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category	Ward 10
Speak English Only	53.5% ±3.1 pp26,526 ±1,528
Spanish	43.8% ±2.9 pp21,748 ±1,429
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic	1.5% ±0.5 pp720 ±233
Other Languages	1.3% ±0.6 pp631 ±317
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this ward, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Speak English Only	53.5%±3.1 pp26,526±1,528	64.6%±0.3 pp1,659,069±8,218	▼ -11.2%	35/50
Spanish	43.8%±2.9 pp21,748±1,429	23.7%±0.2 pp607,865±6,166	▲ +20.1%	10/50
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic	1.5%±0.5 pp720±233	2.6%±0.1 pp67,932±3,529	▼ -1.2%	27/30
Other Languages	1.3%±0.6 pp631±317	1.0%±0.1 pp25,292±2,452	▲ +0.3%	48/50
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this ward, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 10
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	82.5% ±6.4 pp82.5%±6.4 pp40,585 ±3,143
Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents age 5+)	17.5% ±1.6 pp17.5%±1.6 pp8,606 ±809
↳ Speaks English Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	8.4% ±1.2 pp47.8%±4.9 pp4,117 ±572
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	7.2% ±1.1 pp41.0%±5.3 pp3,532 ±564
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	1.9% ±0.8 pp11.1%±4.3 pp956 ±378
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+)	82.5%±6.4 pp82.5%±6.4 pp40,585±3,143	85.4%±0.5 pp85.4%±0.5 pp2,192,778±11,961	▼ -2.9%▼ -2.9%	32/50
Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents age 5+)	17.5%±1.6 pp17.5%±1.6 pp8,606±809	14.6%±0.3 pp14.6%±0.3 pp374,404±6,794	▲ +2.9%▲ +2.9%	19/50
↳ Speaks English Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	8.4%±1.2 pp47.8%±4.9 pp4,117±572	7.1%±0.2 pp48.9%±0.9 pp183,252±4,686	▲ +1.2%▼ -1.1%	18/5031/50
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well)	7.2%±1.1 pp41.0%±5.3 pp3,532±564	5.2%±0.2 pp35.6%±0.8 pp133,269±3,923	▲ +2.0%▲ +5.4%	17/504/50
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well)	1.9%±0.8 pp11.1%±4.3 pp956±378	2.3%±0.1 pp15.5%±0.7 pp57,883±2,982	▼ -0.3%▼ -4.4%	22/5032/50
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category	Ward 10
Married-Couple Households	33.8% ±2.5 pp6,316 ±461
Unmarried-Couple Households	5.1% ±1.4 pp947 ±270
One-Person Households	31.3% ±3.4 pp5,857 ±643
Other Household Types	29.9% ±6.9 pp5,586 ±1,284
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Married-Couple Households	33.8%±2.5 pp6,316±461	30.9%±0.3 pp358,432±3,598	▲ +2.9%	24/50
Unmarried-Couple Households	5.1%±1.4 pp947±270	8.3%±0.2 pp96,220±2,797	▼ -3.2%	41/50
One-Person Households	31.3%±3.4 pp5,857±643	39.7%±0.5 pp460,268±5,729	▼ -8.4%	32/50
Other Household Types	29.9%±6.9 pp5,586±1,284	21.1%±0.7 pp245,285±8,514	▲ +8.7%	13/50
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category	Ward 10
Children in Married-Couple Households	41.3% ±4.7 pp6,206 ±707
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	9.0% ±3.4 pp1,347 ±511
Children in Single-Mother Households	41.8% ±6.5 pp6,267 ±982
Children in Single-Father Households	7.9% ±2.7 pp1,190 ±412
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households	41.3%±4.7 pp6,206±707	56.0%±0.8 pp293,542±4,257	▼ -14.7%	38/50
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households	9.0%±3.4 pp1,347±511	8.8%±0.6 pp45,960±3,208	▲ +0.2%	22/50
Children in Single-Mother Households	41.8%±6.5 pp6,267±982	30.6%±0.9 pp160,535±4,521	▲ +11.1%	16/50
Children in Single-Father Households	7.9%±2.7 pp1,190±412	4.6%±0.4 pp24,133±2,006	▲ +3.3%	3/50
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 10
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	3.7% ±1.2 pp3.7%±1.2 pp1,357 ±437
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	28.7% ±27.1 pp1.1%±1.0 pp389 ±367
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	8.6% ±8.2 pp0.3%±0.3 pp116 ±111
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	27.5% ±8.5 pp1.0%±0.3 pp374 ±115
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	5.9% ±7.7 pp0.2%±0.3 pp80 ±105
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	29.3% ±10.2 pp1.1%±0.4 pp398 ±138
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+)	3.7%±1.2 pp3.7%±1.2 pp1,357±437	2.8%±0.1 pp2.8%±0.1 pp60,766±2,397	▲ +0.9%▲ +0.9%	14/50
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans)	28.7%±27.1 pp1.1%±1.0 pp389±367	26.8%±1.8 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,267±1,067	▲ +1.9%▲ +0.3%	24/509/50
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans)	8.6%±8.2 pp0.3%±0.3 pp116±111	12.9%±1.0 pp0.4%±0.0 pp7,830±579	▼ -4.3%0%	31/5020/50
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans)	27.5%±8.5 pp1.0%±0.3 pp374±115	28.8%±1.4 pp0.8%±0.0 pp17,525±846	▼ -1.3%▲ +0.2%	27/5014/50
↳ Korean War (of veterans)	5.9%±7.7 pp0.2%±0.3 pp80±105	4.9%±0.7 pp0.1%±0.0 pp2,995±441	▲ +1.0%▲ +0.1%	15/5011/50
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans)	29.3%±10.2 pp1.1%±0.4 pp398±138	26.6%±1.5 pp0.7%±0.0 pp16,149±916	▲ +2.7%▲ +0.3%	15/5012/50
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 10
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	80.7% ±2.2 pp80.7%±2.2 pp41,932 ±1,141
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	19.3% ±1.6 pp19.3%±1.6 pp10,023 ±815
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	8.4% ±1.0 pp43.5%±3.5 pp4,358 ±497
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	10.9% ±1.4 pp56.5%±5.8 pp5,665 ±741
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents)	80.7%±2.2 pp80.7%±2.2 pp41,932±1,141	79.1%±0.3 pp79.1%±0.3 pp2,144,343±7,926	▲ +1.6%▲ +1.6%	25/50
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents)	19.3%±1.6 pp19.3%±1.6 pp10,023±815	20.9%±0.3 pp20.9%±0.3 pp566,883±7,968	▼ -1.6%▼ -1.6%	26/50
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents)	8.4%±1.0 pp43.5%±3.5 pp4,358±497	10.0%±0.2 pp47.7%±0.5 pp270,551±4,603	▼ -1.6%▼ -4.2%	26/5029/50
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents)	10.9%±1.4 pp56.5%±5.8 pp5,665±741	10.9%±0.2 pp52.3%±0.9 pp296,332±6,504	0%▲ +4.2%	25/5022/50
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show

Category	Ward 10
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents)	16.2%±1.7 pp83.9%±2.3 pp8,485±877
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	2.9%14.8%1,501
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	Chicago	Difference	Rank
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents)	16.2% ±1.7 pp83.9%±2.3 pp8,485	8.2% ±0.2 pp39.3%222,978	▲ +8.0%▲ +44.6%	9/504/50
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents)	2.9%14.8%1,501	——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show

Category	Ward 10
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	2.0% ±0.7 pp10.2%±3.5 pp1,032 ±369
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	4.5% ±1.1 pp23.1%±5.1 pp2,339 ±556
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	4.9% ±0.9 pp25.5%±3.9 pp2,579 ±448
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	7.9% ±1.0 pp41.2%±3.8 pp4,161 ±522
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents)	2.0%±0.7 pp10.2%±3.5 pp1,032±369	5.9%±0.2 pp1577.0%±145.4 pp159,447±5,557	▼ -3.9%▼ -1566.8%	45/5049/50
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents)	4.5%±1.1 pp23.1%±5.1 pp2,339±556	4.5%±0.1 pp1205.7%±110.4 pp121,912±4,035	0%▼ -1182.6%	25/5015/50
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents)	4.9%±0.9 pp25.5%±3.9 pp2,579±448	4.6%±0.1 pp1224.9%±111.4 pp123,849±3,901	▲ +0.4%▼ -1199.4%	24/5011/50
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents)	7.9%±1.0 pp41.2%±3.8 pp4,161±522	6.0%±0.1 pp1599.0%±140.8 pp161,675±3,491	▲ +2.0%▼ -1557.8%	15/505/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later	0.3% ±0.3 pp189 ±151	1.2% ±0.4 pp636 ±202	2.0% ±0.7 pp1,032 ±370	▲ +1.6 pp▲ +843▲ +0.8 pp▲ +396▲ +0.8 pp▲ +447
Chicago citywide	1.4% ±0.1 pp36,978 ±2,235	3.7% ±0.1 pp99,118 ±3,198	5.9% ±0.2 pp159,447 ±5,568	▲ +4.5 pp▲ +122,469▲ +2.2 pp▲ +60,329▲ +2.3 pp▲ +62,140
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009	4.2% ±0.9 pp2,325 ±512	4.7% ±0.9 pp2,580 ±518	4.5% ±1.1 pp2,339 ±556	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +14▼ −0.2 pp▼ −241▲ +0.5 pp▲ +255
Chicago citywide	5.9% ±0.1 pp161,331 ±3,896	4.9% ±0.1 pp131,658 ±3,182	4.5% ±0.1 pp121,912 ±4,044	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −39,419▼ −0.4 pp▼ −9,746▼ −1.1 pp▼ −29,673
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999	5.2% ±0.9 pp2,858 ±475	4.2% ±0.7 pp2,297 ±373	4.9% ±0.9 pp2,579 ±448	▼ −0.3 pp▼ −279▲ +0.7 pp▲ +282▼ −1.0 pp▼ −561
Chicago citywide	6.1% ±0.1 pp165,077 ±3,717	5.3% ±0.1 pp142,413 ±3,015	4.6% ±0.1 pp123,849 ±3,911	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −41,228▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,564▼ −0.8 pp▼ −22,664
Entered the U.S. Before 1990	11.7% ±1.1 pp6,438 ±595	9.6% ±0.9 pp5,270 ±510	7.9% ±1.0 pp4,161 ±522	▼ −3.7 pp▼ −2,277▼ −1.6 pp▼ −1,109▼ −2.1 pp▼ −1,168
Chicago citywide	7.5% ±0.1 pp204,169 ±3,469	6.9% ±0.1 pp186,050 ±3,114	6.0% ±0.1 pp161,675 ±3,509	▼ −1.6 pp▼ −42,494▼ −0.9 pp▼ −24,375▼ −0.7 pp▼ −18,119

Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category	Ward 10
Average Household Income	$67,909±$3,460
Per Capita Income	$24,692±$1,087
10th Percentile Household Income	$9,456±$1,280
25th Percentile Household Income	$19,791±$2,315
Median Household Income	$48,511±$5,053
75th Percentile Household Income	$96,709±$5,923
90th Percentile Household Income	$151,987±$10,489
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$67,909±$3,460	$116,016±$1,263	▼ −$48,107	42/50
Per Capita Income	$24,692±$1,087	$50,086±$581	▼ −$25,394	44/50
10th Percentile Household Income	$9,456±$1,280	$12,933±$271	▼ −$3,478	38/50
25th Percentile Household Income	$19,791±$2,315	$34,575±$649	▼ −$14,784	43/50
Median Household Income	$48,511±$5,053	$77,902±$907	▼ −$29,391	42/50
75th Percentile Household Income	$96,709±$5,923	$144,150±$1,210	▼ −$47,440	40/50
90th Percentile Household Income	$151,987±$10,489	Over $200,000	▼ −$48,013+	39/50
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$63,888 ±2,669	$67,152 ±3,705	$67,909 ±3,460	▲ +$4,022▲ +$757▲ +$3,264
Chicago citywide	$95,689 ±910	$111,304 ±1,075	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$20,327▲ +$4,712▲ +$15,615
Average Household Income (nominal dollars)	$48,215 ±2,014	$54,729 ±3,019	$67,909 ±3,460	▲ +$19,694▲ +$13,180▲ +$6,514
Chicago citywide	$72,215 ±687	$90,713 ±876	$116,016 ±1,263	▲ +$43,801▲ +$25,303▲ +$18,498
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$21,046 ±630	$23,517 ±1,220	$24,692 ±1,087	▲ +$3,647▲ +$1,175▲ +$2,471
Chicago citywide	$37,927 ±351	$45,525 ±412	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$12,160▲ +$4,562▲ +$7,598
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars)	$15,883 ±476	$19,166 ±995	$24,692 ±1,087	▲ +$8,810▲ +$5,526▲ +$3,284
Chicago citywide	$28,623 ±265	$37,103 ±336	$50,086 ±581	▲ +$21,464▲ +$12,984▲ +$8,480
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$9,698 ±1,143	$8,256 ±922	$9,456 ±1,280	▼ −$243▲ +$1,200▼ −$1,442
Chicago citywide	$11,828 ±190	$13,281 ±277	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$1,105▼ −$348▲ +$1,453
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$7,319 ±863	$6,729 ±751	$9,456 ±1,280	▲ +$2,136▲ +$2,727▼ −$591
Chicago citywide	$8,927 ±144	$10,824 ±225	$12,933 ±271	▲ +$4,007▲ +$2,109▲ +$1,898
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$22,505 ±1,667	$20,975 ±1,800	$19,791 ±2,315	▼ −$2,714▼ −$1,184▼ −$1,530
Chicago citywide	$28,727 ±321	$31,597 ±462	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$5,848▲ +$2,979▲ +$2,869
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$16,985 ±1,258	$17,095 ±1,467	$19,791 ±2,315	▲ +$2,807▲ +$2,697▲ +$110
Chicago citywide	$21,680 ±242	$25,751 ±376	$34,575 ±649	▲ +$12,895▲ +$8,824▲ +$4,071
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$46,518 ±2,695	$48,240 ±3,155	$48,511 ±5,053	▲ +$1,993▲ +$272▲ +$1,721
Chicago citywide	$63,379 ±591	$71,469 ±723	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$14,523▲ +$6,433▲ +$8,090
Median Household Income (nominal dollars)	$35,107 ±2,034	$39,315 ±2,571	$48,511 ±5,053	▲ +$13,405▲ +$9,196▲ +$4,209
Chicago citywide	$47,831 ±446	$58,247 ±589	$77,902 ±907	▲ +$30,071▲ +$19,655▲ +$10,416
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$90,597 ±4,492	$93,432 ±5,099	$96,709 ±5,923	▲ +$6,112▲ +$3,278▲ +$2,834
Chicago citywide	$122,019 ±806	$139,501 ±1,057	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$22,131▲ +$4,648▲ +$17,482
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$68,372 ±3,390	$76,147 ±4,156	$96,709 ±5,923	▲ +$28,337▲ +$20,562▲ +$7,775
Chicago citywide	$92,086 ±608	$113,694 ±862	$144,150 ±1,210	▲ +$52,064▲ +$30,456▲ +$21,608
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$144,264 ±9,302	$140,578 ±6,207	$151,987 ±10,489	▲ +$7,723▲ +$11,409▼ −$3,686
Chicago citywide	$202,601 ±2,442	$235,390 ±1,636	—	——▲ +$32,790
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars)	$108,874 ±7,020	$114,571 ±5,059	$151,987 ±10,489	▲ +$43,113▲ +$37,416▲ +$5,698
Chicago citywide	$152,899 ±1,843	$191,844 ±1,333	—	——▲ +$38,944

Poverty Status

Category	Ward 10
Below Poverty Line	26.9% ±3.0 pp13,962 ±1,578
Below 200% Poverty Line	47.5% ±3.6 pp24,695 ±1,867
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	13.3% ±2.4 pp6,900 ±1,229
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Below Poverty Line	26.9%±3.0 pp13,962±1,578	16.8%±0.4 pp456,194±11,330	▲ +10.0%	7/50
Below 200% Poverty Line	47.5%±3.6 pp24,695±1,867	33.4%±0.6 pp905,794±16,660	▲ +14.1%	9/50
Deep Poverty (Below 50%)	13.3%±2.4 pp6,900±1,229	8.3%±0.3 pp226,117±7,649	▲ +4.9%	9/50
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Category	Ward 10
Food Insecurity	37.9%15,178
Housing Insecurity	29.3%11,739
Transportation Barriers	17.4%6,950
Threatened Utility Shutoff	17.7%7,074
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Food Insecurity	37.9%15,178	24.4%509,385	▲ +13.5%	11/50
Housing Insecurity	29.3%11,739	19.7%411,266	▲ +9.6%	12/50
Transportation Barriers	17.4%6,950	11.6%242,167	▲ +5.8%	11/50
Threatened Utility Shutoff	17.7%7,074	11.9%248,430	▲ +5.8%	13/50
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category	Ward 10
In Labor Force	77.6% ±3.3 pp14,764 ±631
↳ Employed	69.8% ±3.6 pp13,289 ±677
↳ Unemployed	7.7% ±1.8 pp1,475 ±349
↳ Unemployment Rate	10.0% ±2.3 pp—
Not in Labor Force	22.4% ±8.9 pp4,269 ±1,688
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
In Labor Force	77.6%±3.3 pp14,764±631	85.6%±0.3 pp1,069,076±3,571	▼ -8.0%	42/50
↳ Employed	69.8%±3.6 pp13,289±677	79.6%±0.3 pp994,466±4,015	▼ -9.8%	39/50
↳ Unemployed	7.7%±1.8 pp1,475±349	5.9%±0.2 pp73,968±2,565	▲ +1.8%	17/50
↳ Unemployment Rate	10.0%±2.3 pp—	6.9%±0.2 pp86,502±3,074	▲ +3.1%	16/50
Not in Labor Force	22.4%±8.9 pp4,269±1,688	14.4%±1.1 pp180,399±13,145	▲ +8.0%	9/50
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category	Ward 10
Management, Business, Science & Arts	25.3% ±3.6 pp4,945 ±698
↳ Management Occupations	6.3% ±1.4 pp1,226 ±281
↳ Business & Financial Operations	4.4% ±2.2 pp859 ±422
↳ Computer & Mathematical	1.4% ±0.8 pp277 ±149
↳ Architecture & Engineering	1.0% ±0.8 pp188 ±147
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	0.7% ±0.7 pp131 ±138
↳ Community & Social Service	0.9% ±0.6 pp185 ±118
↳ Legal Occupations	1.0% ±0.7 pp192 ±139
↳ Education, Training & Library	4.5% ±1.2 pp880 ±241
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	1.4% ±1.0 pp264 ±195
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	3.0% ±1.7 pp590 ±325
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	0.8% ±0.7 pp155 ±128
Service	24.1% ±3.3 pp4,713 ±643
↳ Healthcare Support	3.2% ±1.1 pp622 ±208
↳ Protective Service	3.3% ±1.1 pp654 ±216
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	7.0% ±1.8 pp1,369 ±361
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	7.5% ±2.2 pp1,472 ±438
↳ Personal Care & Service	3.1% ±1.0 pp596 ±195
Sales & Office	18.3% ±2.6 pp3,566 ±508
↳ Sales & Related	7.1% ±1.6 pp1,388 ±321
↳ Office & Administrative Support	11.1% ±2.0 pp2,178 ±390
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	11.0% ±2.0 pp2,139 ±395
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.8% ±0.7 pp148 ±131
↳ Construction & Extraction	6.5% ±1.4 pp1,271 ±273
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	3.7% ±1.4 pp721 ±274
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	21.3% ±2.8 pp4,169 ±551
↳ Production Occupations	8.8% ±1.9 pp1,725 ±368
↳ Transportation Occupations	4.8% ±1.5 pp931 ±296
↳ Material Moving Occupations	7.7% ±1.6 pp1,512 ±321
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts	25.3%±3.6 pp4,945±698	49.2%±0.4 pp686,743±5,710	▼ -23.9%	44/50
↳ Management Occupations	6.3%±1.4 pp1,226±281	12.3%±0.3 pp172,182±3,807	▼ -6.1%	43/50
↳ Business & Financial Operations	4.4%±2.2 pp859±422	9.1%±0.2 pp127,081±3,358	▼ -4.7%	39/50
↳ Computer & Mathematical	1.4%±0.8 pp277±149	4.9%±0.2 pp68,921±2,690	▼ -3.5%	47/50
↳ Architecture & Engineering	1.0%±0.8 pp188±147	1.6%±0.1 pp22,779±1,380	▼ -0.7%	36/50
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science	0.7%±0.7 pp131±138	1.4%±0.1 pp19,126±1,340	▼ -0.7%	34/50
↳ Community & Social Service	0.9%±0.6 pp185±118	1.9%±0.1 pp26,973±1,500	▼ -1.0%	48/50
↳ Legal Occupations	1.0%±0.7 pp192±139	2.3%±0.1 pp31,629±1,814	▼ -1.3%	31/50
↳ Education, Training & Library	4.5%±1.2 pp880±241	6.6%±0.2 pp92,316±2,697	▼ -2.1%	44/50
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media	1.4%±1.0 pp264±195	3.1%±0.1 pp43,879±1,786	▼ -1.8%	41/50
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners	3.0%±1.7 pp590±325	4.6%±0.2 pp63,551±2,652	▼ -1.5%	32/50
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians	0.8%±0.7 pp155±128	1.3%±0.1 pp18,306±1,387	▼ -0.5%	41/50
Service	24.1%±3.3 pp4,713±643	16.9%±0.3 pp235,977±4,217	▲ +7.2%	10/50
↳ Healthcare Support	3.2%±1.1 pp622±208	3.4%±0.2 pp46,792±2,107	▼ -0.2%	26/50
↳ Protective Service	3.3%±1.1 pp654±216	2.8%±0.1 pp39,146±1,734	▲ +0.5%	20/50
↳ Food Preparation & Serving	7.0%±1.8 pp1,369±361	5.1%±0.2 pp70,514±2,393	▲ +2.0%	11/50
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance	7.5%±2.2 pp1,472±438	3.0%±0.1 pp41,783±1,967	▲ +4.5%	2/50
↳ Personal Care & Service	3.1%±1.0 pp596±195	2.7%±0.1 pp37,742±1,657	▲ +0.3%	20/50
Sales & Office	18.3%±2.6 pp3,566±508	17.4%±0.3 pp243,580±4,754	▲ +0.8%	19/50
↳ Sales & Related	7.1%±1.6 pp1,388±321	8.1%±0.2 pp113,073±3,174	▼ -1.0%	37/50
↳ Office & Administrative Support	11.1%±2.0 pp2,178±390	9.3%±0.3 pp130,507±3,591	▲ +1.8%	15/50
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance	11.0%±2.0 pp2,139±395	4.6%±0.2 pp64,338±2,929	▲ +6.3%	5/50
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry	0.8%±0.7 pp148±131	0.1%±0.0 pp1,506±406	▲ +0.6%	1/50
↳ Construction & Extraction	6.5%±1.4 pp1,271±273	2.8%±0.1 pp39,432±2,062	▲ +3.7%	4/50
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair	3.7%±1.4 pp721±274	1.7%±0.1 pp23,400±1,722	▲ +2.0%	7/50
Production, Transportation & Material Moving	21.3%±2.8 pp4,169±551	11.8%±0.3 pp165,261±3,629	▲ +9.5%	7/50
↳ Production Occupations	8.8%±1.9 pp1,725±368	4.2%±0.2 pp57,989±2,275	▲ +4.7%	7/50
↳ Transportation Occupations	4.8%±1.5 pp931±296	3.9%±0.2 pp54,099±2,118	▲ +0.9%	21/50
↳ Material Moving Occupations	7.7%±1.6 pp1,512±321	3.8%±0.2 pp53,173±2,312	▲ +3.9%	8/50
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category	Ward 10
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.5% ±0.6 pp106 ±117
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	0.5% ±0.6 pp106 ±117
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0% ±0.4 pp0
Construction	7.1% ±1.6 pp1,392 ±310
Manufacturing	13.6% ±2.1 pp2,648 ±419
Wholesale Trade	2.8% ±1.1 pp543 ±209
Retail Trade	9.0% ±1.5 pp1,755 ±299
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	11.1% ±1.9 pp2,159 ±369
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	10.2% ±1.9 pp1,984 ±365
↳ Utilities	0.9% ±0.6 pp175 ±116
Information	1.0% ±0.7 pp188 ±127
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	4.5% ±1.1 pp880 ±211
↳ Finance & Insurance	2.7% ±0.8 pp520 ±166
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.8% ±0.8 pp361 ±161
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	12.5% ±2.8 pp2,434 ±548
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	3.4% ±1.0 pp661 ±195
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0% ±0.4 pp0
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	9.1% ±2.7 pp1,772 ±530
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	19.5% ±2.6 pp3,806 ±507
↳ Educational Services	8.5% ±2.3 pp1,670 ±455
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	10.9% ±1.6 pp2,136 ±314
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	10.3% ±2.1 pp2,010 ±403
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	2.3% ±1.0 pp444 ±194
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	8.0% ±1.9 pp1,566 ±375
Other Services	4.9% ±1.2 pp964 ±241
Public Administration	3.3% ±1.0 pp647 ±205
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.5%±0.6 pp106±117	0.2%±0.0 pp—	▲ +0.3%	2/50
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting	0.5%±0.6 pp106±117	0.2%±0.0 pp—	▲ +0.4%	2/50
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%±0.4 pp0	0.0%±0.0 pp—	0%	23/50
Construction	7.1%±1.6 pp1,392±310	3.8%±0.2 pp—	▲ +3.4%	5/50
Manufacturing	13.6%±2.1 pp2,648±419	7.7%±0.2 pp—	▲ +5.9%	4/50
Wholesale Trade	2.8%±1.1 pp543±209	2.0%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.8%	8/50
Retail Trade	9.0%±1.5 pp1,755±299	8.2%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.8%	29/50
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	11.1%±1.9 pp2,159±369	7.1%±0.2 pp—	▲ +4.0%	10/50
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	10.2%±1.9 pp1,984±365	6.5%±0.2 pp—	▲ +3.6%	10/50
↳ Utilities	0.9%±0.6 pp175±116	0.5%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.4%	8/50
Information	1.0%±0.7 pp188±127	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▼ -1.2%	40/50
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	4.5%±1.1 pp880±211	8.8%±0.2 pp—	▼ -4.3%	43/50
↳ Finance & Insurance	2.7%±0.8 pp520±166	6.7%±0.2 pp—	▼ -4.0%	47/50
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	1.8%±0.8 pp361±161	2.1%±0.1 pp—	▼ -0.3%	29/50
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	12.5%±2.8 pp2,434±548	18.2%±0.4 pp—	▼ -5.7%	37/50
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	3.4%±1.0 pp661±195	13.4%±0.3 pp—	▼ -10.1%	48/50
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.0%±0.4 pp0	0.1%±0.0 pp—	▼ -0.1%	37/50
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	9.1%±2.7 pp1,772±530	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▲ +4.4%	5/50
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	19.5%±2.6 pp3,806±507	24.2%±0.4 pp—	▼ -4.7%	45/50
↳ Educational Services	8.5%±2.3 pp1,670±455	10.5%±0.2 pp—	▼ -1.9%	34/50
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	10.9%±1.6 pp2,136±314	13.7%±0.3 pp—	▼ -2.7%	44/50
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	10.3%±2.1 pp2,010±403	9.1%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.2%	17/50
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	2.3%±1.0 pp444±194	2.2%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.1%	20/50
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	8.0%±1.9 pp1,566±375	6.9%±0.2 pp—	▲ +1.1%	17/50
Other Services	4.9%±1.2 pp964±241	4.6%±0.2 pp—	▲ +0.3%	21/50
Public Administration	3.3%±1.0 pp647±205	4.0%±0.2 pp—	▼ -0.7%	29/50
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category	Ward 10
Private Company Employee	68.9% ±1.4 pp13,462 ±271
Self-Employed	6.8% ±1.5 pp1,336 ±290
Nonprofit	9.2% ±1.6 pp1,792 ±309
Government	15.0% ±3.1 pp2,936 ±602
Unpaid Family Worker	0.0% ±0.4 pp6 ±86
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Private Company Employee	68.9%±1.4 pp13,462±271	67.9%±0.4 pp947,845±5,822	▲ +1.0%	19/50
Self-Employed	6.8%±1.5 pp1,336±290	8.3%±0.2 pp115,690±2,989	▼ -1.4%	38/50
Nonprofit	9.2%±1.6 pp1,792±309	12.1%±0.3 pp169,124±4,035	▼ -2.9%	41/50
Government	15.0%±3.1 pp2,936±602	12.9%±0.3 pp179,945±4,021	▲ +2.1%	19/50
Unpaid Family Worker	0.0%±0.4 pp6±86	0.2%±0.0 pp2,312±408	▼ -0.1%	40/50
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category	Ward 10
Full-Time, Year-Round	65.8% ±2.7 pp14,545 ±593
Part-Time or Part-Year	34.2% ±3.0 pp7,546 ±657
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round	65.8%±2.7 pp14,545±593	67.0%±0.3 pp1,025,726±3,875	▼ -1.2%	24/50
Part-Time or Part-Year	34.2%±3.0 pp7,546±657	33.0%±0.3 pp504,210±4,897	▲ +1.2%	27/50
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category	Ward 10
Average FT Earnings	$50,412±$2,283
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$23,528±$2,292
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$33,821±$1,654
Median FT Earnings	$47,351±$1,555
75th Percentile FT Earnings	$71,033±$5,316
90th Percentile FT Earnings	$99,760±$2,448
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Average FT Earnings	$50,412±$2,283	$96,214±$968	▼ −$45,803	47/50
10th Percentile FT Earnings	$23,528±$2,292	$29,008±$387	▼ −$5,480	40/50
25th Percentile FT Earnings	$33,821±$1,654	$43,011±$345	▼ −$9,190	41/50
Median FT Earnings	$47,351±$1,555	$69,663±$530	▼ −$22,312	44/50
75th Percentile FT Earnings	$71,033±$5,316	Over $100,000	▼ −$28,967+	44/50
90th Percentile FT Earnings	$99,760±$2,448	Over $100,000	▼ −$240+	45/50
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$54,991 ±1,927	$57,123 ±2,850	$50,412 ±2,283	▼ −$4,579▼ −$6,712▲ +$2,132
Chicago citywide	$83,170 ±714	$91,467 ±682	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$13,044▲ +$4,747▲ +$8,297
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$41,501 ±1,454	$46,556 ±2,323	$50,412 ±2,283	▲ +$8,911▲ +$3,856▲ +$5,055
Chicago citywide	$62,767 ±539	$74,546 ±556	$96,214 ±968	▲ +$33,447▲ +$21,669▲ +$11,778
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$20,680 ±1,393	$20,331 ±1,614	$23,528 ±2,292	▲ +$2,848▲ +$3,197▼ −$349
Chicago citywide	$24,209 ±243	$26,113 ±152	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$4,799▲ +$2,895▲ +$1,904
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$15,607 ±1,052	$16,570 ±1,315	$23,528 ±2,292	▲ +$7,921▲ +$6,958▲ +$963
Chicago citywide	$18,270 ±183	$21,282 ±124	$29,008 ±387	▲ +$10,738▲ +$7,726▲ +$3,012
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$29,390 ±1,329	$31,796 ±1,463	$33,821 ±1,654	▲ +$4,431▲ +$2,025▲ +$2,406
Chicago citywide	$37,393 ±278	$39,415 ±229	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$5,618▲ +$3,597▲ +$2,021
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$22,180 ±1,003	$25,914 ±1,193	$33,821 ±1,654	▲ +$11,641▲ +$7,907▲ +$3,734
Chicago citywide	$28,220 ±210	$32,123 ±187	$43,011 ±345	▲ +$14,791▲ +$10,888▲ +$3,903
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$46,146 ±2,455	$45,902 ±2,431	$47,351 ±1,555	▲ +$1,205▲ +$1,448▼ −$244
Chicago citywide	$60,575 ±496	$64,628 ±327	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,034▲ +$4,054
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$34,825 ±1,853	$37,410 ±1,981	$47,351 ±1,555	▲ +$12,525▲ +$9,940▲ +$2,585
Chicago citywide	$45,715 ±374	$52,672 ±266	$69,663 ±530	▲ +$23,948▲ +$16,991▲ +$6,957
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$72,188 ±3,848	$69,466 ±3,546	$71,033 ±5,316	▼ −$1,155▲ +$1,567▼ −$2,722
Chicago citywide	$98,274 ±615	$108,202 ±616	—	——▲ +$9,928
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$54,479 ±2,904	$56,615 ±2,890	$71,033 ±5,316	▲ +$16,554▲ +$14,418▲ +$2,136
Chicago citywide	$74,166 ±464	$88,185 ±502	—	——▲ +$14,019
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$106,981 ±6,221	$105,982 ±8,344	$99,760 ±2,448	▼ −$7,221▼ −$6,222▼ −$998
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$80,737 ±4,695	$86,376 ±6,800	$99,760 ±2,448	▲ +$19,023▲ +$13,384▲ +$5,639
Chicago citywide	—	—	—	———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category	Ward 10
Average PT Earnings	$20,549±$2,731
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$1,970±$511
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$5,951±$936
Median PT Earnings	$14,186±$2,635
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$26,249±$2,842
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$47,615±$7,930
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Average PT Earnings	$20,549±$2,731	$33,575±$750	▼ −$13,026	48/50
10th Percentile PT Earnings	$1,970±$511	$2,183±$87	▼ −$214	32/50
25th Percentile PT Earnings	$5,951±$936	$7,222±$206	▼ −$1,270	39/50
Median PT Earnings	$14,186±$2,635	$19,180±$393	▼ −$4,994	44/50
75th Percentile PT Earnings	$26,249±$2,842	$38,498±$681	▼ −$12,249	48/50
90th Percentile PT Earnings	$47,615±$7,930	$73,776±$1,391	▼ −$26,162	45/50
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$22,486 ±2,115	$22,756 ±4,435	$20,549 ±2,731	▼ −$1,936▼ −$2,207▲ +$271
Chicago citywide	$27,076 ±473	$31,236 ±676	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$6,500▲ +$2,340▲ +$4,160
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$16,970 ±1,596	$18,546 ±3,614	$20,549 ±2,731	▲ +$3,580▲ +$2,003▲ +$1,577
Chicago citywide	$20,433 ±357	$25,457 ±551	$33,575 ±750	▲ +$13,142▲ +$8,118▲ +$5,024
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,038 ±333	$1,796 ±323	$1,970 ±511	▼ −$68▲ +$174▼ −$242
Chicago citywide	$2,230 ±48	$2,283 ±59	$2,183 ±87	▼ −$47▼ −$100▲ +$53
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$1,538 ±251	$1,464 ±263	$1,970 ±511	▲ +$432▲ +$506▼ −$74
Chicago citywide	$1,683 ±36	$1,861 ±48	$2,183 ±87	▲ +$500▲ +$322▲ +$178
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$6,151 ±917	$5,666 ±982	$5,951 ±936	▼ −$200▲ +$285▼ −$485
Chicago citywide	$6,390 ±123	$6,841 ±156	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$832▲ +$381▲ +$451
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$4,642 ±692	$4,618 ±800	$5,951 ±936	▲ +$1,309▲ +$1,333▼ −$24
Chicago citywide	$4,822 ±93	$5,575 ±127	$7,222 ±206	▲ +$2,399▲ +$1,646▲ +$753
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$15,142 ±1,475	$13,344 ±1,490	$14,186 ±2,635	▼ −$956▲ +$842▼ −$1,798
Chicago citywide	$15,461 ±166	$17,025 ±275	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$3,719▲ +$2,155▲ +$1,563
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$11,427 ±1,113	$10,875 ±1,215	$14,186 ±2,635	▲ +$2,758▲ +$3,311▼ −$552
Chicago citywide	$11,668 ±125	$13,875 ±224	$19,180 ±393	▲ +$7,512▲ +$5,305▲ +$2,207
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$29,240 ±3,669	$26,877 ±2,428	$26,249 ±2,842	▼ −$2,991▼ −$628▼ −$2,363
Chicago citywide	$30,795 ±619	$34,779 ±505	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$7,703▲ +$3,719▲ +$3,984
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$22,067 ±2,769	$21,905 ±1,979	$26,249 ±2,842	▲ +$4,182▲ +$4,344▼ −$162
Chicago citywide	$23,241 ±468	$28,345 ±412	$38,498 ±681	▲ +$15,257▲ +$10,153▲ +$5,104
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$53,966 ±7,313	$48,857 ±8,611	$47,615 ±7,930	▼ −$6,351▼ −$1,242▼ −$5,109
Chicago citywide	$61,207 ±1,249	$68,040 ±1,298	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$12,570▲ +$5,737▲ +$6,833
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars)	$40,727 ±5,519	$39,819 ±7,018	$47,615 ±7,930	▲ +$6,888▲ +$7,796▼ −$909
Chicago citywide	$46,192 ±942	$55,452 ±1,058	$73,776 ±1,391	▲ +$27,585▲ +$18,324▲ +$9,261

Earnings of All Workers

Category	Ward 10
Average Earnings	$40,795±$1,316
10th Percentile Earnings	$6,814±$1,294
25th Percentile Earnings	$19,776±$2,449
Median Earnings	$37,266±$2,385
75th Percentile Earnings	$58,902±$3,651
90th Percentile Earnings	$92,389±$4,312
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Average Earnings	$40,795±$1,316	$75,571±$768	▼ −$34,776	46/50
10th Percentile Earnings	$6,814±$1,294	$8,529±$272	▼ −$1,715	32/50
25th Percentile Earnings	$19,776±$2,449	$25,183±$358	▼ −$5,407	35/50
Median Earnings	$37,266±$2,385	$51,367±$471	▼ −$14,101	39/50
75th Percentile Earnings	$58,902±$3,651	$93,324±$598	▼ −$34,421	43/50
90th Percentile Earnings	$92,389±$4,312	Over $100,000	▼ −$7,611+	43/50
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$40,864 ±1,312	$45,150 ±2,306	$40,795 ±1,316	▼ −$70▼ −$4,356▲ +$4,286
Chicago citywide	$62,453 ±534	$71,626 ±551	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$13,118▲ +$3,945▲ +$9,173
Average Earnings (nominal dollars)	$30,840 ±990	$36,798 ±1,880	$40,795 ±1,316	▲ +$9,955▲ +$3,997▲ +$5,958
Chicago citywide	$47,133 ±403	$58,375 ±449	$75,571 ±768	▲ +$28,438▲ +$17,196▲ +$11,243
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$5,284 ±923	$6,341 ±1,044	$6,814 ±1,294	▲ +$1,531▲ +$473▲ +$1,058
Chicago citywide	$6,858 ±139	$8,358 ±164	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$1,671▲ +$171▲ +$1,500
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$3,987 ±697	$5,168 ±851	$6,814 ±1,294	▲ +$2,827▲ +$1,646▲ +$1,181
Chicago citywide	$5,176 ±105	$6,812 ±134	$8,529 ±272	▲ +$3,354▲ +$1,717▲ +$1,636
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$15,947 ±1,278	$16,943 ±1,684	$19,776 ±2,449	▲ +$3,829▲ +$2,833▲ +$996
Chicago citywide	$19,598 ±241	$23,173 ±290	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$5,585▲ +$2,010▲ +$3,576
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$12,035 ±964	$13,809 ±1,372	$19,776 ±2,449	▲ +$7,741▲ +$5,967▲ +$1,773
Chicago citywide	$14,790 ±182	$18,886 ±236	$25,183 ±358	▲ +$10,393▲ +$6,297▲ +$4,096
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$31,777 ±1,903	$35,415 ±1,612	$37,266 ±2,385	▲ +$5,490▲ +$1,851▲ +$3,639
Chicago citywide	$42,365 ±293	$47,195 ±370	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$9,002▲ +$4,172▲ +$4,830
Median Earnings (nominal dollars)	$23,981 ±1,436	$28,864 ±1,313	$37,266 ±2,385	▲ +$13,285▲ +$8,403▲ +$4,882
Chicago citywide	$31,972 ±221	$38,464 ±302	$51,367 ±471	▲ +$19,395▲ +$12,903▲ +$6,492
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$57,522 ±2,541	$59,027 ±3,520	$58,902 ±3,651	▲ +$1,381▼ −$125▲ +$1,506
Chicago citywide	$78,784 ±555	$87,853 ±597	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$14,540▲ +$5,471▲ +$9,069
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$43,411 ±1,917	$48,107 ±2,869	$58,902 ±3,651	▲ +$15,492▲ +$10,795▲ +$4,697
Chicago citywide	$59,457 ±418	$71,600 ±486	$93,324 ±598	▲ +$33,867▲ +$21,723▲ +$12,144
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$93,305 ±4,912	$91,483 ±6,066	$92,389 ±4,312	▼ −$916▲ +$905▼ −$1,822
Chicago citywide	$128,659 ±682	—	—	———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars)	$70,416 ±3,707	$74,559 ±4,944	$92,389 ±4,312	▲ +$21,973▲ +$17,830▲ +$4,143
Chicago citywide	$97,097 ±515	—	—	———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 10

Category	Ward 10
Household income at age 35	$44,650 ±$800
Household income percentile rank	42.1 ±0.51 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	11.3% ±0.63 pp
Individual income at age 35	$34,176 ±$625
Fraction married	28.4% ±0.88 pp
Employment rate	75.6% ±0.87 pp
Incarceration rate	2.42% ±0.37 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 10. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 10 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$44,650 ±$800	$43,090 ±$102	+$1,561
Household income percentile rank	42.1 ±0.51 pp	40.9 ±0.06 pp	+1.3 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	11.3% ±0.63 pp	11.4% ±0.08 pp	−0.1 pp
Individual income at age 35	$34,176 ±$625	$33,544 ±$80	+$632
Fraction married	28.4% ±0.88 pp	26.4% ±0.11 pp	+2.1 pp
Employment rate	75.6% ±0.87 pp	74.4% ±0.11 pp	+1.2 pp
Incarceration rate	2.42% ±0.37 pp	2.87% ±0.05 pp	−0.4 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 10. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 10 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 10 in Lower-Income Families

Category	Ward 10
Household income at age 35	$36,209 ±$1,004
Household income percentile rank	36.5 ±0.70 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	6.82% ±0.78 pp
Individual income at age 35	$29,067 ±$847
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 10 with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 10 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference
Household income at age 35	$36,209 ±$1,004	$34,711 ±$124	+$1,498
Household income percentile rank	36.5 ±0.70 pp	35.3 ±0.09 pp	+1.1 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income	6.82% ±0.78 pp	6.31% ±0.09 pp	+0.5 pp
Individual income at age 35	$29,067 ±$847	$28,716 ±$106	+$351
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 10 with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 10 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Ward 10

Category	Ward 10
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	69.6% ±0.95 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	24.9% ±0.88 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 10. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 10 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference
Stayed in the greater Chicago area	69.6% ±0.95 pp	78.1% ±0.11 pp	−8.5 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area	24.9% ±0.88 pp	22.9% ±0.11 pp	+2.0 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 10. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Chicago area” means the Census commuting zone for the Chicago area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Chicago Ward 10 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in Ward 10

Category	Ward 10
All jobs located in ward 10	13,856
Ward 10 jobs held by Ward 10 residents	10.7%
Ward 10 jobs held by non-Ward 10 residents	89.3%
Employed residents working in Ward 10	7.7%
Employed residents working outside Ward 10	92.3%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 10	Chicago ward median	Difference	Rank
All jobs located in ward 10	13,856	11,093	▲ +2,763	21/50
Ward 10 jobs held by Ward 10 residents	10.7%	6.3%	▲ +4.4 pp	4/50
Ward 10 jobs held by non-Ward 10 residents	89.3%	93.7%	▼ −4.4 pp	47/50
Employed residents working in Ward 10	7.7%	3.2%	▲ +4.6 pp	5/50
Employed residents working outside Ward 10	92.3%	96.8%	▼ −4.6 pp	46/50
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in ward 10	12,410	12,316	13,856	▲ +1,446▲ +1,540▼ −94
Chicago citywide	10,920	11,554	11,093	▲ +174▼ −460▲ +634
Ward 10 jobs held by Ward 10 residents	10.2%1,209	11.7%1,379	10.7%1,426	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +217▼ −1.0 pp▲ +47▲ +1.5 pp▲ +170
Chicago citywide	6.4%696	6.4%725	6.3%701	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5▼ −0.1 pp▼ −24– 0.0 pp▲ +29
Ward 10 jobs held by non-Ward 10 residents	89.8%10,602	88.3%10,367	89.3%11,911	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +1,309▲ +1.0 pp▲ +1,544▼ −1.5 pp▼ −235
Chicago citywide	93.6%9,244	93.6%9,497	93.7%9,122	▲ +0.1 pp▼ −122▲ +0.1 pp▼ −375– 0.0 pp▲ +253
Employed residents working in Ward 10	7.2%1,209	7.8%1,379	7.7%1,426	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +217– 0.0 pp▲ +47▲ +0.6 pp▲ +170
Chicago citywide	3.3%696	3.0%725	3.2%701	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5▲ +0.1 pp▼ −24▼ −0.2 pp▲ +29
Employed residents working outside Ward 10	92.8%15,677	92.2%16,347	92.3%16,996	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,319– 0.0 pp▲ +649▼ −0.6 pp▲ +670
Chicago citywide	96.7%19,233	97.0%20,782	96.8%20,998	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,765▼ −0.1 pp▲ +216▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,549

Industry of Jobs in Ward 10

Category	Ward 10
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%4
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%4
Construction	3.4%469
Manufacturing	57.8%8,015
Wholesale Trade	4.9%674
Retail Trade	5.1%704
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	6.2%861
↳ Utilities	0.0%0
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	6.2%861
Information	0.0%1
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	2.1%290
↳ Finance & Insurance	1.4%196
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	0.7%94
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	5.7%796
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	1.3%184
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.1%15
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	4.3%597
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	7.4%1,021
↳ Educational Services	0.9%123
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	6.5%898
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	4.4%610
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	0.5%73
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	3.9%537
Other Services	2.9%406
Public Administration	0.0%5
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.0%4	0.0%423	0%	13/50
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.0%4	0.0%36	0%	2/50
Construction	3.4%469	1.9%27,207	▲ +1.5%	15/50
Manufacturing	57.8%8,015	4.4%64,747	▲ +53.4%	1/50
Wholesale Trade	4.9%674	2.8%41,460	▲ +2.0%	15/50
Retail Trade	5.1%704	6.6%96,413	▼ -1.5%	42/50
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	6.2%861	6.0%87,845	▲ +0.2%	13/50
↳ Utilities	0.0%0	0.3%5,012	▼ -0.3%	20/50
↳ Transportation & Warehousing	6.2%861	5.7%82,833	▲ +0.6%	11/50
Information	0.0%1	3.5%51,095	▼ -3.5%	50/50
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	2.1%290	10.8%157,520	▼ -8.7%	42/50
↳ Finance & Insurance	1.4%196	8.6%125,824	▼ -7.2%	32/50
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	0.7%94	2.2%31,696	▼ -1.5%	42/50
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	5.7%796	23.2%339,220	▼ -17.4%	40/50
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	1.3%184	14.2%207,444	▼ -12.8%	44/50
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.1%15	1.2%16,872	▼ -1.0%	20/50
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	4.3%597	7.9%114,904	▼ -3.5%	28/50
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	7.4%1,021	23.0%336,089	▼ -15.6%	46/50
↳ Educational Services	0.9%123	9.2%134,671	▼ -8.3%	48/50
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance	6.5%898	13.8%201,418	▼ -7.3%	44/50
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	4.4%610	10.3%151,055	▼ -5.9%	46/50
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	0.5%73	1.9%27,339	▼ -1.3%	28/50
↳ Accommodation & Food Services	3.9%537	8.5%123,716	▼ -4.6%	47/50
Other Services	2.9%406	4.0%59,136	▼ -1.1%	41/50
Public Administration	0.0%5	3.5%51,418	▼ -3.5%	14/50
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining	0.1%7	0.0%1	0.0%4	– 0.0 pp▼ −3– 0.0 pp▲ +3– 0.0 pp▼ −6
Chicago citywide	0.0%181	0.0%569	0.0%423	– 0.0 pp▲ +242– 0.0 pp▼ −146– 0.0 pp▲ +388
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction	0.1%7	0.0%1	0.0%4	– 0.0 pp▼ −3– 0.0 pp▲ +3– 0.0 pp▼ −6
Chicago citywide	0.0%140	0.0%374	0.0%36	– 0.0 pp▼ −104– 0.0 pp▼ −338– 0.0 pp▲ +234
Construction	3.1%379	3.7%461	3.4%469	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +90▼ −0.4 pp▲ +8▲ +0.7 pp▲ +82
Chicago citywide	1.6%20,789	1.8%26,012	1.9%27,207	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,418– 0.0 pp▲ +1,195▲ +0.3 pp▲ +5,223
Manufacturing	43.5%5,399	51.0%6,285	57.8%8,015	▲ +14.3 pp▲ +2,616▲ +6.8 pp▲ +1,730▲ +7.5 pp▲ +886
Chicago citywide	4.6%61,066	4.5%63,597	4.4%64,747	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,681▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,150▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,531
Wholesale Trade	8.3%1,031	5.6%689	4.9%674	▼ −3.4 pp▼ −357▼ −0.7 pp▼ −15▼ −2.7 pp▼ −342
Chicago citywide	3.0%39,431	2.9%41,789	2.8%41,460	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +2,029▼ −0.1 pp▼ −329▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,358
Retail Trade	6.1%756	5.1%631	5.1%704	▼ −1.0 pp▼ −52– 0.0 pp▲ +73▼ −1.0 pp▼ −125
Chicago citywide	7.4%97,262	6.9%97,836	6.6%96,413	▼ −0.8 pp▼ −849▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,423▼ −0.5 pp▲ +574
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities	6.8%841	5.5%679	6.2%861	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +20▲ +0.7 pp▲ +182▼ −1.3 pp▼ −162
Chicago citywide	5.4%71,371	5.6%79,303	6.0%87,845	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +16,474▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,542▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,932
Utilities	0.0%0	0.0%3	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▼ −3– 0.0 pp▲ +3
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,383	0.3%4,956	0.3%5,012	– 0.0 pp▲ +629– 0.0 pp▲ +56– 0.0 pp▲ +573
Transportation & Warehousing	6.8%841	5.5%676	6.2%861	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +20▲ +0.7 pp▲ +185▼ −1.3 pp▼ −165
Chicago citywide	5.1%66,988	5.2%74,347	5.7%82,833	▲ +0.6 pp▲ +15,845▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,486▲ +0.1 pp▲ +7,359
Information	0.0%4	0.0%4	0.0%1	– 0.0 pp▼ −3– 0.0 pp▼ −3– 0.0 pp– 0
Chicago citywide	3.1%40,514	3.4%48,135	3.5%51,095	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +10,581▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,960▲ +0.3 pp▲ +7,621
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate	2.1%256	3.1%379	2.1%290	– 0.0 pp▲ +34▼ −1.0 pp▼ −89▲ +1.0 pp▲ +123
Chicago citywide	10.5%138,287	10.6%150,163	10.8%157,520	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +19,233▲ +0.2 pp▲ +7,357▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,876
Finance & Insurance	1.9%238	2.1%258	1.4%196	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −42▼ −0.7 pp▼ −62▲ +0.2 pp▲ +20
Chicago citywide	8.5%111,307	8.4%119,147	8.6%125,824	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +14,517▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,677▼ −0.1 pp▲ +7,840
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing	0.1%18	1.0%121	0.7%94	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +76▼ −0.3 pp▼ −27▲ +0.8 pp▲ +103
Chicago citywide	2.1%26,980	2.2%31,016	2.2%31,696	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,716– 0.0 pp▲ +680▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,036
Professional, Scientific & Management Services	8.5%1,053	9.3%1,147	5.7%796	▼ −2.7 pp▼ −257▼ −3.6 pp▼ −351▲ +0.8 pp▲ +94
Chicago citywide	21.2%278,928	22.6%319,744	23.2%339,220	▲ +2.0 pp▲ +60,292▲ +0.6 pp▲ +19,476▲ +1.3 pp▲ +40,816
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services	2.0%254	2.7%334	1.3%184	▼ −0.7 pp▼ −70▼ −1.4 pp▼ −150▲ +0.7 pp▲ +80
Chicago citywide	11.8%155,200	12.9%182,462	14.2%207,444	▲ +2.4 pp▲ +52,244▲ +1.3 pp▲ +24,982▲ +1.1 pp▲ +27,262
Management of Companies & Enterprises	0.4%47	0.5%65	0.1%15	▼ −0.3 pp▼ −32▼ −0.4 pp▼ −50▲ +0.1 pp▲ +18
Chicago citywide	1.0%13,619	1.2%16,600	1.2%16,872	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,253– 0.0 pp▲ +272▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,981
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services	6.1%752	6.1%748	4.3%597	▼ −1.8 pp▼ −155▼ −1.8 pp▼ −151– 0.0 pp▼ −4
Chicago citywide	8.4%110,109	8.5%120,682	7.9%114,904	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +4,795▼ −0.7 pp▼ −5,778▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,573
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance	9.3%1,160	8.9%1,090	7.4%1,021	▼ −2.0 pp▼ −139▼ −1.5 pp▼ −69▼ −0.5 pp▼ −70
Chicago citywide	23.5%308,633	22.1%313,540	23.0%336,089	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +27,456▲ +0.8 pp▲ +22,549▼ −1.4 pp▲ +4,907
Educational Services	1.4%169	1.8%221	0.9%123	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −46▼ −0.9 pp▼ −98▲ +0.4 pp▲ +52
Chicago citywide	10.1%132,909	9.0%128,169	9.2%134,671	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +1,762▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,502▼ −1.1 pp▼ −4,740
Health Care & Social Assistance	8.0%991	7.1%869	6.5%898	▼ −1.5 pp▼ −93▼ −0.6 pp▲ +29▼ −0.9 pp▼ −122
Chicago citywide	13.4%175,724	13.1%185,371	13.8%201,418	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +25,694▲ +0.7 pp▲ +16,047▼ −0.3 pp▲ +9,647
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services	9.3%1,153	5.0%610	4.4%610	▼ −4.9 pp▼ −543▼ −0.6 pp– 0▼ −4.3 pp▼ −543
Chicago citywide	10.9%143,753	11.5%162,749	10.3%151,055	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,302▼ −1.2 pp▼ −11,694▲ +0.5 pp▲ +18,996
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation	0.9%116	0.5%67	0.5%73	▼ −0.4 pp▼ −43– 0.0 pp▲ +6▼ −0.4 pp▼ −49
Chicago citywide	1.7%22,179	2.1%30,178	1.9%27,339	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +5,160▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,839▲ +0.4 pp▲ +7,999
Accommodation & Food Services	8.4%1,037	4.4%543	3.9%537	▼ −4.5 pp▼ −500▼ −0.5 pp▼ −6▼ −3.9 pp▼ −494
Chicago citywide	9.3%121,574	9.4%132,571	8.5%123,716	▼ −0.8 pp▲ +2,142▼ −0.9 pp▼ −8,855▲ +0.1 pp▲ +10,997
Other Services	2.9%357	2.7%335	2.9%406	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +49▲ +0.2 pp▲ +71▼ −0.2 pp▼ −22
Chicago citywide	4.5%59,098	4.4%61,698	4.0%59,136	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +38▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,562▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,600
Public Administration	0.1%14	0.0%5	0.0%5	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −9– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.1 pp▼ −9
Chicago citywide	4.2%54,814	3.6%51,684	3.5%51,418	▼ −0.7 pp▼ −3,396▼ −0.1 pp▼ −266▼ −0.5 pp▼ −3,130

Earnings of Jobs in Ward 10

Category	Ward 10
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	9.7%1,344
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	26.6%3,685
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	63.7%8,827
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	9.7%1,344	12.7%185,297	▼ -3.0%	47/50
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	26.6%3,685	20.5%299,480	▲ +6.1%	40/50
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	63.7%8,827	66.9%978,851	▼ -3.2%	8/50
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less	16.5%2,047	13.2%1,631	9.7%1,344	▼ −6.8 pp▼ −703▼ −3.5 pp▼ −287▼ −3.3 pp▼ −416
Chicago citywide	21.3%280,137	16.8%238,135	12.7%185,297	▼ −8.7 pp▼ −94,840▼ −4.1 pp▼ −52,838▼ −4.5 pp▼ −42,002
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year	27.0%3,349	28.2%3,479	26.6%3,685	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +336▼ −1.7 pp▲ +206▲ +1.3 pp▲ +130
Chicago citywide	30.7%403,250	26.7%378,530	20.5%299,480	▼ −10.2 pp▼ −103,770▼ −6.3 pp▼ −79,050▼ −4.0 pp▼ −24,720
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year	56.5%7,014	58.5%7,206	63.7%8,827	▲ +7.2 pp▲ +1,813▲ +5.2 pp▲ +1,621▲ +2.0 pp▲ +192
Chicago citywide	48.0%630,740	56.5%800,154	66.9%978,851	▲ +18.9 pp▲ +348,111▲ +10.4 pp▲ +178,697▲ +8.5 pp▲ +169,414

Jobs in Ward 10 by Firm Age

Category	Ward 10
Firm age: 0–1 years	1.8%250
Firm age: 2–3 years	1.3%178
Firm age: 4–5 years	1.5%209
Firm age: 6–10 years	4.1%562
Firm age: 11 or more years	91.3%12,652
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years	1.8%250	2.8%37,293	▼ -1.0%	42/50
Firm age: 2–3 years	1.3%178	2.8%37,154	▼ -1.5%	48/50
Firm age: 4–5 years	1.5%209	3.2%41,869	▼ -1.7%	47/50
Firm age: 6–10 years	4.1%562	7.8%102,354	▼ -3.7%	47/50
Firm age: 11 or more years	91.3%12,652	83.4%1,098,247	▲ +7.9%	2/50
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years	6.1%760	4.4%536	1.8%250	▼ −4.3 pp▼ −510▼ −2.6 pp▼ −286▼ −1.8 pp▼ −224
Chicago citywide	2.9%33,224	2.6%33,244	2.8%37,293	– 0.0 pp▲ +4,069▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,049▼ −0.2 pp▲ +20
Firm age: 2–3 years	2.9%355	1.3%164	1.3%178	▼ −1.6 pp▼ −177– 0.0 pp▲ +14▼ −1.5 pp▼ −191
Chicago citywide	4.0%46,935	3.3%42,284	2.8%37,154	▼ −1.2 pp▼ −9,781▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,130▼ −0.7 pp▼ −4,651
Firm age: 4–5 years	2.1%257	3.0%374	1.5%209	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −48▼ −1.5 pp▼ −165▲ +1.0 pp▲ +117
Chicago citywide	3.7%42,688	3.6%46,058	3.2%41,869	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −819▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,189▼ −0.1 pp▲ +3,370
Firm age: 6–10 years	5.8%724	4.1%509	4.1%562	▼ −1.8 pp▼ −162▼ −0.1 pp▲ +53▼ −1.7 pp▼ −215
Chicago citywide	8.2%94,955	8.6%109,934	7.8%102,354	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +7,399▼ −0.9 pp▼ −7,580▲ +0.5 pp▲ +14,979
Firm age: 11 or more years	83.1%10,299	87.1%10,724	91.3%12,652	▲ +8.3 pp▲ +2,353▲ +4.2 pp▲ +1,928▲ +4.0 pp▲ +425
Chicago citywide	81.3%946,852	81.8%1,043,037	83.4%1,098,247	▲ +2.1 pp▲ +151,395▲ +1.6 pp▲ +55,210▲ +0.5 pp▲ +96,185

Jobs in Ward 10 by Firm Size

Category	Ward 10
Firm size: 0–19 employees	11.8%1,641
Firm size: 20–49 employees	5.8%802
Firm size: 50–249 employees	9.0%1,245
Firm size: 250–499 employees	5.4%753
Firm size: 500 or more employees	67.9%9,410
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees	11.8%1,641	12.8%168,975	▼ -1.0%	44/50
Firm size: 20–49 employees	5.8%802	7.3%96,432	▼ -1.5%	44/50
Firm size: 50–249 employees	9.0%1,245	13.8%181,123	▼ -4.8%	49/50
Firm size: 250–499 employees	5.4%753	5.7%74,787	▼ -0.2%	24/50
Firm size: 500 or more employees	67.9%9,410	60.4%795,600	▲ +7.5%	5/50
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees	12.4%1,543	14.1%1,730	11.8%1,641	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +98▼ −2.2 pp▼ −89▲ +1.6 pp▲ +187
Chicago citywide	13.9%162,248	13.3%169,949	12.8%168,975	▼ −1.1 pp▲ +6,727▼ −0.5 pp▼ −974▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,701
Firm size: 20–49 employees	8.7%1,074	6.9%852	5.8%802	▼ −2.9 pp▼ −272▼ −1.1 pp▼ −50▼ −1.7 pp▼ −222
Chicago citywide	8.4%97,503	8.2%103,945	7.3%96,432	▼ −1.0 pp▼ −1,071▼ −0.8 pp▼ −7,513▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,442
Firm size: 50–249 employees	13.2%1,640	12.1%1,492	9.0%1,245	▼ −4.2 pp▼ −395▼ −3.1 pp▼ −247▼ −1.1 pp▼ −148
Chicago citywide	15.7%183,275	14.9%189,930	13.8%181,123	▼ −2.0 pp▼ −2,152▼ −1.1 pp▼ −8,807▼ −0.8 pp▲ +6,655
Firm size: 250–499 employees	7.8%970	7.4%912	5.4%753	▼ −2.4 pp▼ −217▼ −2.0 pp▼ −159▼ −0.4 pp▼ −58
Chicago citywide	6.3%72,992	5.9%74,603	5.7%74,787	▼ −0.6 pp▲ +1,795▼ −0.2 pp▲ +184▼ −0.4 pp▲ +1,611
Firm size: 500 or more employees	57.8%7,168	59.5%7,321	67.9%9,410	▲ +10.1 pp▲ +2,242▲ +8.5 pp▲ +2,089▲ +1.7 pp▲ +153
Chicago citywide	55.7%648,636	57.8%736,130	60.4%795,600	▲ +4.7 pp▲ +146,964▲ +2.7 pp▲ +59,470▲ +2.1 pp▲ +87,494

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 10
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	22.3% ±1.7 pp22.3%±1.7 pp11,668 ±908
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	85.5% ±11.5 pp19.1%±2.6 pp9,972 ±1,337
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	14.5% ±4.9 pp3.2%±1.1 pp1,696 ±576
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents)	22.3%±1.7 pp22.3%±1.7 pp11,668±908	13.5%±0.2 pp13.5%±0.2 pp365,577±5,480	▲ +8.8%▲ +8.8%	1/50
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees)	85.5%±11.5 pp19.1%±2.6 pp9,972±1,337	83.0%±0.5 pp11.2%±0.1 pp303,520±1,897	▲ +2.4%▲ +7.9%	24/502/50
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees)	14.5%±4.9 pp3.2%±1.1 pp1,696±576	17.0%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.1 pp62,057±2,247	▼ -2.4%▲ +1.0%	27/508/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 10
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	4.9% ±1.0 pp4.9%±1.0 pp2,549 ±508
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	69.5% ±12.4 pp3.4%±0.6 pp1,771 ±316
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	30.5% ±5.3 pp1.5%±0.3 pp778 ±135
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	83.7% ±9.7 pp4.1%±0.5 pp2,132 ±248
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	16.3% ±4.6 pp0.8%±0.2 pp416 ±117
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents)	4.9%±1.0 pp4.9%±1.0 pp2,549±508	7.4%±0.1 pp7.4%±0.1 pp201,851±4,036	▼ -2.5%▼ -2.5%	41/50
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees)	69.5%±12.4 pp3.4%±0.6 pp1,771±316	52.4%±0.7 pp3.9%±0.1 pp105,720±1,511	▲ +17.1%▼ -0.5%	17/5036/50
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees)	30.5%±5.3 pp1.5%±0.3 pp778±135	47.6%±1.2 pp3.5%±0.1 pp96,131±2,437	▼ -17.1%▼ -2.0%	34/5038/50
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees)	83.7%±9.7 pp4.1%±0.5 pp2,132±248	67.0%±1.0 pp5.0%±0.1 pp135,301±1,945	▲ +16.6%▼ -0.9%	9/5031/50
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees)	16.3%±4.6 pp0.8%±0.2 pp416±117	33.0%±1.2 pp2.5%±0.1 pp66,550±2,459	▼ -16.6%▼ -1.7%	42/5043/50
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category	Ward 10
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	6.2% ±2.5 pp784 ±309
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	4.3% ±3.7 pp109 ±94
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	6.2%±2.5 pp784±309	5.9%±0.5 pp—	▲ +0.4%	19/50
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet	4.3%±3.7 pp109±94	5.4%±0.6 pp—	▼ -1.1%	23/50
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category	Ward 10
Owner-Occupied Households	53.1% ±2.6 pp10,016 ±486
Renter-Occupied Households	46.9% ±3.2 pp8,838 ±610
Owner-Occupied Residents	53.8% ±2.9 pp27,826 ±1,505
Renter-Occupied Residents	46.2% ±3.8 pp23,865 ±1,959
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Owner-Occupied Households	53.1%±2.6 pp10,016±486	46.0%±0.4 pp534,012±4,939	▲ +7.1%	17/50
Renter-Occupied Households	46.9%±3.2 pp8,838±610	54.0%±0.4 pp626,193±5,183	▼ -7.1%	34/50
Owner-Occupied Residents	53.8%±2.9 pp27,826±1,505	51.8%±0.5 pp1,377,219±13,574	▲ +2.0%	19/50
Renter-Occupied Residents	46.2%±3.8 pp23,865±1,959	48.2%±0.5 pp1,280,665±13,500	▼ -2.0%	32/50
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category	Ward 10
Median Year Moved In	2010±1.2 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later	1.6% ±0.8 pp296 ±152
Moved in 2020 to 2022	12.7% ±2.1 pp2,375 ±399
Moved in 2010 to 2019	39.2% ±4.2 pp7,329 ±783
Moved in 2000 to 2009	17.0% ±2.0 pp3,186 ±381
Moved in 1990 to 1999	12.8% ±2.1 pp2,397 ±388
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	16.7% ±2.0 pp3,123 ±375
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Moved In	2010±1.2 yr	2015±1.0 yr	▼ −5	40/50
Moved in 2023 or Later	1.6%±0.8 pp296±152	5.9%±0.2 pp68,884±2,742	▼ -4.4%	49/50
Moved in 2020 to 2022	12.7%±2.1 pp2,375±399	24.1%±0.4 pp279,417±5,059	▼ -11.4%	44/50
Moved in 2010 to 2019	39.2%±4.2 pp7,329±783	39.2%±0.5 pp455,125±5,772	▼ -0.1%	28/50
Moved in 2000 to 2009	17.0%±2.0 pp3,186±381	13.8%±0.3 pp160,353±3,324	▲ +3.2%	11/50
Moved in 1990 to 1999	12.8%±2.1 pp2,397±388	8.2%±0.2 pp95,243±2,390	▲ +4.6%	10/50
Moved in 1989 or Earlier	16.7%±2.0 pp3,123±375	8.7%±0.2 pp101,183±2,362	▲ +8.0%	7/50
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 10
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	7.1% ±1.6 pp7.1%±1.6 pp3,702 ±851
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	6.2% ±1.6 pp87.6%±9.0 pp3,244 ±817
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	0.0% ±0.1 pp0.6%±1.5 pp22 ±57
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	0.6% ±0.4 pp8.2%±6.0 pp302 ±233
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	0.3% ±0.2 pp3.6%±2.3 pp135 ±90
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents)	7.1%±1.6 pp7.1%±1.6 pp3,702±851	14.0%±0.3 pp14.0%±0.3 pp375,475±8,289	▼ -6.9%▼ -6.9%	43/50
↳ Moved Within Cook County (of recent movers)	6.2%±1.6 pp87.6%±9.0 pp3,244±817	9.8%±0.3 pp69.9%±1.0 pp262,365±6,953	▼ -3.6%▲ +17.8%	41/504/50
↳ Moved from Different Illinois County (of recent movers)	0.0%±0.1 pp0.6%±1.5 pp22±57	0.8%±0.1 pp5.5%±0.4 pp20,552±1,626	▼ -0.7%▼ -4.9%	48/5049/50
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers)	0.6%±0.4 pp8.2%±6.0 pp302±233	2.5%±0.1 pp17.6%±0.7 pp65,936±2,918	▼ -1.9%▼ -9.4%	41/5036/50
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers)	0.3%±0.2 pp3.6%±2.3 pp135±90	1.0%±0.1 pp7.1%±0.8 pp26,622±3,040	▼ -0.7%▼ -3.4%	43/5037/50
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 10
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	13.3% ±1.8 pp13.3%±1.8 pp2,889 ±399
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	2.6% ±1.1 pp19.7%±7.9 pp569 ±242
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.9% ±0.6 pp6.7%±4.3 pp194 ±127
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.3% ±0.6 pp2.4%±4.1 pp68 ±119
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	9.5% ±1.6 pp71.2%±6.8 pp2,058 ±345
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	6.1% ±2.5 pp6.1%±2.5 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	1.9% ±1.2 pp1.9%±1.2 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units)	13.3%±1.8 pp13.3%±1.8 pp2,889±399	9.1%±0.2 pp9.1%±0.2 pp116,849±2,682	▲ +4.2%▲ +4.2%	8/50
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units)	2.6%±1.1 pp19.7%±7.9 pp569±242	2.5%±0.1 pp27.1%±1.4 pp31,723±1,796	▲ +0.1%▼ -7.5%	20/5035/50
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units)	0.9%±0.6 pp6.7%±4.3 pp194±127	0.6%±0.1 pp6.0%±0.7 pp7,037±795	▲ +0.3%▲ +0.7%	9/5017/50
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units)	0.3%±0.6 pp2.4%±4.1 pp68±119	0.2%±0.0 pp2.4%±0.5 pp2,831±587	▲ +0.1%▼ -0.1%	12/5018/50
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units)	9.5%±1.6 pp71.2%±6.8 pp2,058±345	5.9%±0.3 pp64.4%±2.5 pp75,258±3,387	▲ +3.6%▲ +6.8%	9/5017/50
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units)	6.1%±2.5 pp6.1%±2.5 pp—	4.8%±0.3 pp4.8%±0.3 pp—	▲ +1.3%▲ +1.3%	12/50
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units)	1.9%±1.2 pp1.9%±1.2 pp—	1.3%±0.1 pp1.3%±0.1 pp—	▲ +0.6%▲ +0.6%	12/50
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category	Ward 10
Median Year Built	1946±2 yr
Pre-1940	41.8% ±3.2 pp9,053 ±682
1940-2009	56.8% ±3.5 pp12,289 ±761
2010+	1.4% ±0.8 pp310 ±179
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Median Year Built	1946±2 yr	1953±1 yr	▼ −7 yrs	32/50
Pre-1940	41.8%±3.2 pp9,053±682	38.8%±0.4 pp495,715±4,678	▲ +3.0%	26/50
1940-2009	56.8%±3.5 pp12,289±761	54.9%±0.6 pp700,698±7,435	▲ +1.9%	18/50
2010+	1.4%±0.8 pp310±179	6.3%±0.2 pp80,641±2,725	▼ -4.9%	44/50
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category	Ward 10
Population Density	2,511 /sq mi±139/sq mi
Single-Family Homes	55.2% ±2.3 pp11,951 ±497
Buildings With 2–4 Units	31.0% ±3.3 pp6,714 ±707
Buildings With 5–19 Units	8.9% ±1.4 pp1,922 ±303
Buildings With 20 or More Units	3.2% ±0.8 pp694 ±173
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Population Density	2,511 /sq mi±139/sq mi	11,721 /sq mi±26/sq mi	▼ −9,210 /sq mi	50/50
Single-Family Homes	55.2%±2.3 pp11,951±497	29.2%±0.3 pp372,679±3,989	▲ +26.0%	9/50
Buildings With 2–4 Units	31.0%±3.3 pp6,714±707	27.4%±0.4 pp349,976±4,957	▲ +3.6%	25/50
Buildings With 5–19 Units	8.9%±1.4 pp1,922±303	16.2%±0.3 pp206,420±4,124	▼ -7.3%	37/50
Buildings With 20 or More Units	3.2%±0.8 pp694±173	27.0%±0.3 pp344,543±4,438	▼ -23.8%	45/50
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category	Ward 10
Studio	3.4% ±1.8 pp729 ±386
1 Bedroom	8.7% ±1.3 pp1,894 ±290
2 Bedrooms	28.6% ±2.7 pp6,202 ±576
3 Bedrooms	43.7% ±3.1 pp9,470 ±676
4 Bedrooms	11.2% ±1.6 pp2,423 ±356
5 or More Bedrooms	4.3% ±1.1 pp934 ±228
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Studio	3.4%±1.8 pp729±386	7.5%±0.3 pp95,749±3,205	▼ -4.1%	32/50
1 Bedroom	8.7%±1.3 pp1,894±290	20.1%±0.4 pp257,271±4,939	▼ -11.4%	44/50
2 Bedrooms	28.6%±2.7 pp6,202±576	33.1%±0.3 pp422,866±4,221	▼ -4.5%	42/50
3 Bedrooms	43.7%±3.1 pp9,470±676	26.1%±0.3 pp333,682±4,061	▲ +17.6%	2/50
4 Bedrooms	11.2%±1.6 pp2,423±356	9.0%±0.2 pp115,453±2,426	▲ +2.1%	17/50
5 or More Bedrooms	4.3%±1.1 pp934±228	4.1%±0.2 pp52,033±2,072	▲ +0.2%	25/50
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 10
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	4.9% ±1.4 pp4.9%±1.4 pp924 ±259
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	3.9% ±1.2 pp78.2%±8.6 pp722 ±217
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	1.1% ±0.8 pp21.8%±14.2 pp202 ±143
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units)	4.9%±1.4 pp4.9%±1.4 pp924±259	3.4%±0.2 pp3.4%±0.2 pp39,979±1,996	▲ +1.5%▲ +1.5%	12/50
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units)	3.9%±1.2 pp78.2%±8.6 pp722±217	2.0%±0.1 pp58.2%±2.3 pp23,276±1,493	▲ +1.9%▲ +19.9%	8/504/50
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units)	1.1%±0.8 pp21.8%±14.2 pp202±143	1.4%±0.1 pp41.8%±2.6 pp16,703±1,328	▼ -0.4%▼ -19.9%	30/5047/50
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category	Ward 10
Natural Gas Heat	88.7% ±2.2 pp16,598 ±411
Electric Heat	8.2% ±1.5 pp1,538 ±280
Other Heating Source	3.1% ±1.4 pp571 ±270
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Natural Gas Heat	88.7%±2.2 pp16,598±411	77.5%±0.3 pp899,660±3,501	▲ +11.2%	13/50
Electric Heat	8.2%±1.5 pp1,538±280	18.0%±0.3 pp208,937±3,864	▼ -9.8%	36/50
Other Heating Source	3.1%±1.4 pp571±270	4.4%±0.2 pp51,603±2,173	▼ -1.4%	34/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show

Category	Ward 10
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	44.9% ±2.6 pp8,390 ±485
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	18.2% ±3.3 pp3,411 ±619
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	36.9% ±3.4 pp6,906 ±629
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	22.0% ±3.1 pp4,123 ±583
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	26.9% ±4.4 pp1,975 ±324
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	19.2% ±4.7 pp1,406 ±344
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	53.9% ±5.2 pp3,949 ±382
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	34.6% ±5.6 pp2,538 ±412
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	57.9% ±2.7 pp5,731 ±267
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	17.5% ±4.6 pp1,731 ±454
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	24.6% ±4.0 pp2,436 ±393
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	12.8% ±3.2 pp1,266 ±315
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	45.4% ±4.4 pp2,286 ±221
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	25.0% ±8.3 pp1,258 ±418
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	29.7% ±5.5 pp1,496 ±276
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	16.6% ±4.6 pp839 ±234
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage and a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	70.9% ±3.8 pp3,445 ±186
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	9.7% ±3.1 pp473 ±151
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	19.3% ±5.5 pp940 ±268
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	8.8% ±4.2 pp427 ±204
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage and with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	44.9%±2.6 pp8,390±485	24.9%±0.4 pp289,047±4,524	▲ +19.9%	11/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	18.2%±3.3 pp3,411±619	23.8%±0.4 pp276,514±4,291	▼ -5.6%	43/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	36.9%±3.4 pp6,906±629	45.6%±0.5 pp529,378±5,291	▼ -8.7%	31/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	22.0%±3.1 pp4,123±583	24.0%±0.4 pp278,684±4,167	▼ -2.0%	18/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	26.9%±4.4 pp1,975±324	26.4%±0.5 pp155,936±3,134	▲ +0.6%	26/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	19.2%±4.7 pp1,406±344	25.3%±0.5 pp149,215±2,939	▼ -6.1%	42/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	53.9%±5.2 pp3,949±382	48.3%±0.7 pp285,567±4,222	▲ +5.5%	17/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	34.6%±5.6 pp2,538±412	25.5%±0.6 pp150,346±3,554	▲ +9.2%	11/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	57.9%±2.7 pp5,731±267	51.6%±0.6 pp272,277±2,904	▲ +6.3%	4/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	17.5%±4.6 pp1,731±454	19.6%±0.5 pp103,661±2,759	▼ -2.1%	35/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	24.6%±4.0 pp2,436±393	28.8%±0.6 pp151,994±3,034	▼ -4.2%	40/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	12.8%±3.2 pp1,266±315	13.8%±0.4 pp73,053±2,233	▼ -1.0%	33/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	45.4%±4.4 pp2,286±221	42.8%±0.7 pp146,216±2,365	▲ +2.6%	11/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	25.0%±8.3 pp1,258±418	23.9%±0.7 pp81,659±2,408	▲ +1.1%	21/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	29.7%±5.5 pp1,496±276	33.3%±0.8 pp113,882±2,596	▼ -3.6%	38/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	16.6%±4.6 pp839±234	15.4%±0.5 pp52,632±1,873	▲ +1.2%	20/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage and a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing	70.9%±3.8 pp3,445±186	67.7%±0.9 pp126,058±1,613	▲ +3.2%	12/50
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing	9.7%±3.1 pp473±151	11.8%±0.7 pp22,000±1,275	▼ -2.1%	39/50
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing	19.3%±5.5 pp940±268	20.5%±0.8 pp38,106±1,492	▼ -1.1%	30/50
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing	8.8%±4.2 pp427±204	11.0%±0.6 pp20,421±1,202	▼ -2.2%	38/50
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage and with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category	Ward 10
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$304±$45
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$555±$31
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$937±$57
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,377±$41
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,847±$65
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$304±$45	$594±$11	▼ −$290	50/50
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$555±$31	$1,011±$8	▼ −$456	50/50
Median Monthly Housing Costs	$937±$57	$1,560±$10	▼ −$623	50/50
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,377±$41	$2,329±$13	▼ −$953	50/50
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs	$1,847±$65	Over $3,000	▼ −$1,153+	50/50
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$353 ±26	$364 ±28	$304 ±45	▼ −$49▼ −$60▲ +$10
Chicago citywide	$609 ±7	$606 ±7	$594 ±11	▼ −$15▼ −$12▼ −$2
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$267 ±19	$297 ±23	$304 ±45	▲ +$37▲ +$8▲ +$30
Chicago citywide	$459 ±6	$494 ±6	$594 ±11	▲ +$135▲ +$100▲ +$35
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$594 ±25	$604 ±25	$555 ±31	▼ −$39▼ −$49▲ +$10
Chicago citywide	$992 ±5	$1,001 ±5	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$19▲ +$10▲ +$9
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$448 ±19	$492 ±20	$555 ±31	▲ +$107▲ +$63▲ +$44
Chicago citywide	$748 ±3	$816 ±4	$1,011 ±8	▲ +$262▲ +$195▲ +$67
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,022 ±37	$931 ±31	$937 ±57	▼ −$85▲ +$6▼ −$91
Chicago citywide	$1,493 ±8	$1,523 ±6	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$67▲ +$37▲ +$29
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$771 ±28	$759 ±25	$937 ±57	▲ +$166▲ +$178▼ −$13
Chicago citywide	$1,127 ±6	$1,241 ±5	$1,560 ±10	▲ +$433▲ +$319▲ +$114
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,640 ±51	$1,458 ±51	$1,377 ±41	▼ −$264▼ −$82▼ −$182
Chicago citywide	$2,333 ±12	$2,326 ±10	$2,329 ±13	▼ −$4▲ +$3▼ −$7
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,238 ±39	$1,189 ±42	$1,377 ±41	▲ +$139▲ +$188▼ −$49
Chicago citywide	$1,761 ±9	$1,896 ±8	$2,329 ±13	▲ +$569▲ +$434▲ +$135
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,220 ±94	$1,966 ±110	$1,847 ±65	▼ −$374▼ −$119▼ −$255
Chicago citywide	—	$3,316 ±20	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars)	$1,676 ±71	$1,602 ±90	$1,847 ±65	▲ +$171▲ +$245▼ −$74
Chicago citywide	—	$2,703 ±16	—	———

Rent

Rent measure

Category	Ward 10
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$994±$71
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$284±$60
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$601±$70
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$936±$66
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,324±$85
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,745±$122
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities	$994±$71	$1,613±$12	▼ −$618	50/50
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$284±$60	$696±$20	▼ −$413	50/50
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$601±$70	$1,043±$8	▼ −$442	50/50
Median Rent Plus Utilities	$936±$66	$1,440±$10	▼ −$504	50/50
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,324±$85	$2,021±$21	▼ −$697	48/50
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities	$1,745±$122	$2,738±$29	▼ −$994	45/50
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10
Average Rent	$797±$58
10th Percentile Rent	$245±$32
25th Percentile Rent	$482±$57
Median Rent	$742±$60
75th Percentile Rent	$1,052±$76
90th Percentile Rent	$1,345±$97
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Average Rent	$797±$58	$1,452±$11	▼ −$655	50/50
10th Percentile Rent	$245±$32	$564±$21	▼ −$319	48/50
25th Percentile Rent	$482±$57	$913±$7	▼ −$431	50/50
Median Rent	$742±$60	$1,262±$12	▼ −$520	50/50
75th Percentile Rent	$1,052±$76	$1,868±$13	▼ −$816	49/50
90th Percentile Rent	$1,345±$97	$2,528±$38	▼ −$1,183	46/50
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category	Ward 10
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,484±$248
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$976±$52
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,152±$62
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,400±$56
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,801±$102
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,306±$211
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,484±$248	$2,734±$24	▼ −$1,250	50/50
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$976±$52	$1,270±$14	▼ −$294	48/50
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,152±$62	$1,697±$14	▼ −$545	50/50
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,400±$56	$2,339±$17	▼ −$939	50/50
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$1,801±$102	$3,269±$31	▼ −$1,468	50/50
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage)	$2,306±$211	Over $4,000	▼ −$1,694+	49/50
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,847 ±58	$1,711 ±64	$1,484 ±248	▼ −$363▼ −$228▼ −$135
Chicago citywide	$2,855 ±19	$2,793 ±23	$2,734 ±24	▼ −$121▼ −$60▼ −$61
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,394 ±44	$1,395 ±52	$1,484 ±248	▲ +$90▲ +$89▲ +$1
Chicago citywide	$2,154 ±14	$2,277 ±19	$2,734 ±24	▲ +$579▲ +$457▲ +$122
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,097 ±81	$1,040 ±86	$976 ±52	▼ −$121▼ −$64▼ −$58
Chicago citywide	$1,403 ±11	$1,356 ±11	$1,270 ±14	▼ −$133▼ −$86▼ −$47
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$828 ±61	$847 ±70	$976 ±52	▲ +$148▲ +$129▲ +$19
Chicago citywide	$1,059 ±8	$1,105 ±9	$1,270 ±14	▲ +$212▲ +$165▲ +$46
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,387 ±52	$1,283 ±56	$1,152 ±62	▼ −$235▼ −$131▼ −$104
Chicago citywide	$1,874 ±12	$1,800 ±12	$1,697 ±14	▼ −$177▼ −$103▼ −$74
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,046 ±40	$1,046 ±45	$1,152 ±62	▲ +$106▲ +$106▼ −$1
Chicago citywide	$1,414 ±9	$1,467 ±10	$1,697 ±14	▲ +$283▲ +$230▲ +$53
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$1,737 ±66	$1,627 ±62	$1,400 ±56	▼ −$337▼ −$227▼ −$110
Chicago citywide	$2,526 ±13	$2,422 ±13	$2,339 ±17	▼ −$187▼ −$83▼ −$103
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,311 ±50	$1,326 ±51	$1,400 ±56	▲ +$89▲ +$74▲ +$15
Chicago citywide	$1,906 ±10	$1,974 ±11	$2,339 ±17	▲ +$433▲ +$365▲ +$68
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,253 ±101	$2,090 ±118	$1,801 ±102	▼ −$452▼ −$289▼ −$163
Chicago citywide	$3,447 ±25	$3,343 ±25	$3,269 ±31	▼ −$178▼ −$74▼ −$104
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$1,700 ±76	$1,703 ±96	$1,801 ±102	▲ +$101▲ +$97▲ +$3
Chicago citywide	$2,601 ±19	$2,724 ±20	$3,269 ±31	▲ +$668▲ +$544▲ +$123
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$2,779 ±165	$2,622 ±241	$2,306 ±211	▼ −$473▼ −$316▼ −$157
Chicago citywide	—	$4,578 ±59	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars)	$2,097 ±124	$2,137 ±197	$2,306 ±211	▲ +$208▲ +$169▲ +$40
Chicago citywide	—	$3,731 ±48	—	———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category	Ward 10
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$661±$48
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$332±$25
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$440±$31
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$571±$23
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$741±$43
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$970±$87
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs	$661±$48	$1,078±$22	▼ −$416	50/50
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$332±$25	$418±$8	▼ −$86	44/50
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$440±$31	$601±$8	▼ −$160	49/50
Median Monthly Owner Costs	$571±$23	$859±$10	▼ −$288	50/50
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$741±$43	$1,197±$18	▼ −$456	50/50
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs	$970±$87	Over $1,500	▼ −$530+	50/50
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$618 ±27	$634 ±26	$661 ±48	▲ +$43▲ +$27▲ +$16
Chicago citywide	$957 ±15	$1,028 ±10	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$121▲ +$50▲ +$71
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$467 ±20	$517 ±21	$661 ±48	▲ +$195▲ +$144▲ +$50
Chicago citywide	$722 ±11	$838 ±8	$1,078 ±22	▲ +$355▲ +$240▲ +$116
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$328 ±30	$398 ±32	$332 ±25	▲ +$4▼ −$66▲ +$70
Chicago citywide	$429 ±6	$469 ±7	$418 ±8	▼ −$11▼ −$51▲ +$40
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$248 ±22	$325 ±26	$332 ±25	▲ +$84▲ +$8▲ +$77
Chicago citywide	$324 ±5	$382 ±5	$418 ±8	▲ +$95▲ +$36▲ +$59
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$445 ±24	$502 ±19	$440 ±31	▼ −$5▼ −$61▲ +$56
Chicago citywide	$586 ±6	$629 ±6	$601 ±8	▲ +$14▼ −$28▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$336 ±18	$409 ±16	$440 ±31	▲ +$104▲ +$32▲ +$73
Chicago citywide	$442 ±4	$513 ±5	$601 ±8	▲ +$158▲ +$88▲ +$70
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$568 ±23	$631 ±23	$571 ±23	▲ +$3▼ −$61▲ +$63
Chicago citywide	$815 ±9	$860 ±7	$859 ±10	▲ +$44▼ −$1▲ +$45
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$429 ±17	$515 ±18	$571 ±23	▲ +$142▲ +$56▲ +$86
Chicago citywide	$615 ±7	$701 ±6	$859 ±10	▲ +$244▲ +$158▲ +$86
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$721 ±35	$770 ±37	$741 ±43	▲ +$20▼ −$28▲ +$48
Chicago citywide	—	$1,206 ±14	$1,197 ±18	—▼ −$9—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	$544 ±27	$627 ±30	$741 ±43	▲ +$197▲ +$114▲ +$83
Chicago citywide	—	$983 ±12	$1,197 ±18	—▲ +$214—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	—	$945 ±66	$970 ±87	—▲ +$26—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,767 ±35	—	———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars)	—	$770 ±54	$970 ±87	—▲ +$200—
Chicago citywide	—	$1,440 ±28	—	———

Home Values

Category	Ward 10
Average Home Value	$223,613±$38,301
10th Percentile Home Value	$83,198±$14,017
25th Percentile Home Value	$123,197±$11,094
Median Home Value	$178,025±$6,784
75th Percentile Home Value	$238,392±$10,547
90th Percentile Home Value	$299,604±$22,411
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Average Home Value	$223,613±$38,301	$437,638±$7,358	▼ −$214,025	44/50
10th Percentile Home Value	$83,198±$14,017	$129,150±$3,756	▼ −$45,952	42/50
25th Percentile Home Value	$123,197±$11,094	$217,800±$1,804	▼ −$94,603	46/50
Median Home Value	$178,025±$6,784	$334,100±$2,424	▼ −$156,075	48/50
75th Percentile Home Value	$238,392±$10,547	$497,700±$3,730	▼ −$259,308	49/50
90th Percentile Home Value	$299,604±$22,411	$809,159±$15,691	▼ −$509,556	50/50
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

	2010–14	2015–19	2020–24	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$183,416 ±10,357	$201,552 ±22,307	$223,613 ±38,301	▲ +$40,197▲ +$22,061▲ +$18,136
Chicago citywide	$386,614 ±5,106	$424,380 ±4,754	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$51,024▲ +$13,258▲ +$37,766
Average Home Value (nominal dollars)	$138,421 ±7,816	$164,265 ±18,180	$223,613 ±38,301	▲ +$85,192▲ +$59,348▲ +$25,844
Chicago citywide	$291,771 ±3,853	$345,871 ±3,874	$437,638 ±7,358	▲ +$145,867▲ +$91,768▲ +$54,099
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$79,631 ±11,076	$79,184 ±11,206	$83,198 ±14,017	▲ +$3,567▲ +$4,014▼ −$447
Chicago citywide	$115,330 ±1,421	$124,313 ±1,339	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$13,821▲ +$4,838▲ +$8,983
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$60,096 ±8,359	$64,535 ±9,133	$83,198 ±14,017	▲ +$23,102▲ +$18,663▲ +$4,439
Chicago citywide	$87,037 ±1,072	$101,315 ±1,091	$129,150 ±3,756	▲ +$42,113▲ +$27,835▲ +$14,278
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$116,845 ±6,110	$121,344 ±5,500	$123,197 ±11,094	▲ +$6,351▲ +$1,853▲ +$4,499
Chicago citywide	$190,543 ±2,400	$199,018 ±1,255	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$27,257▲ +$18,782▲ +$8,475
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$88,181 ±4,611	$98,896 ±4,482	$123,197 ±11,094	▲ +$35,015▲ +$24,301▲ +$10,714
Chicago citywide	$143,800 ±1,811	$162,200 ±1,023	$217,800 ±1,804	▲ +$74,000▲ +$55,600▲ +$18,400
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$163,878 ±6,269	$159,196 ±6,937	$178,025 ±6,784	▲ +$14,147▲ +$18,830▼ −$4,683
Chicago citywide	$299,066 ±2,120	$316,564 ±2,118	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$35,034▲ +$17,536▲ +$17,498
Median Home Value (nominal dollars)	$123,676 ±4,731	$129,745 ±5,654	$178,025 ±6,784	▲ +$54,349▲ +$48,281▲ +$6,068
Chicago citywide	$225,700 ±1,600	$258,000 ±1,726	$334,100 ±2,424	▲ +$108,400▲ +$76,100▲ +$32,300
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$222,856 ±6,163	$208,122 ±5,188	$238,392 ±10,547	▲ +$15,536▲ +$30,270▼ −$14,734
Chicago citywide	$466,951 ±3,138	$490,797 ±3,892	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$30,749▲ +$6,903▲ +$23,846
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$168,185 ±4,651	$169,620 ±4,228	$238,392 ±10,547	▲ +$70,207▲ +$68,772▲ +$1,434
Chicago citywide	$352,400 ±2,368	$400,000 ±3,172	$497,700 ±3,730	▲ +$145,300▲ +$97,700▲ +$47,600
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars)	$303,732 ±21,032	$313,980 ±28,177	$299,604 ±22,411	▼ −$4,128▼ −$14,376▲ +$10,248
Chicago citywide	$739,174 ±12,945	$835,769 ±9,047	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$69,986▼ −$26,610▲ +$96,595
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars)	$229,221 ±15,872	$255,894 ±22,964	$299,604 ±22,411	▲ +$70,382▲ +$43,710▲ +$26,672
Chicago citywide	$557,842 ±9,770	$681,153 ±7,373	$809,159 ±15,691	▲ +$251,317▲ +$128,006▲ +$123,311

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show

Category	Ward 10
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	14.4%14.4%3,118
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	3.9%26.8%836
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	8.3%57.9%1,805
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	2.2%15.3%477
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.0%0.0%0
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units)	14.4%14.4%3,118	8.3%8.3%106,578	▲ +6.1%▲ +6.1%	12/50
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units)	3.9%26.8%836	4.8%57.2%60,910	▼ -0.9%▼ -30.3%	20/5045/50
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units)	8.3%57.9%1,805	1.1%13.8%14,721	▲ +7.2%▲ +44.1%	1/501/50
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units)	2.2%15.3%477	2.1%25.7%27,383	▲ +0.1%▼ -10.4%	15/5030/50
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units)	0.0%0.0%0	0.3%3.3%3,564	▼ -0.3%▼ -3.3%	38/5038/50
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units	14.7%3,119	14.0%3,003	14.4%3,118	▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1▲ +0.4 pp▲ +115▼ −0.7 pp▼ −116
Chicago citywide	8.8%104,550	8.5%103,479	8.3%106,578	▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,028▼ −0.2 pp▲ +3,099▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,071
Housing Choice Vouchers	3.6%772	3.4%734	3.9%836	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +64▲ +0.4 pp▲ +102▼ −0.2 pp▼ −38
Chicago citywide	4.3%51,601	4.6%55,987	4.8%60,910	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +9,309▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,923▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,386
Public Housing	8.7%1,851	8.4%1,808	8.3%1,805	▼ −0.4 pp▼ −46▼ −0.1 pp▼ −3▼ −0.3 pp▼ −43
Chicago citywide	1.8%21,159	1.3%16,094	1.2%14,721	▼ −0.6 pp▼ −6,438▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,373▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,065
Project-Based Section 8	2.3%493	2.2%461	2.2%477	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −16▲ +0.1 pp▲ +16▼ −0.2 pp▼ −32
Chicago citywide	2.2%25,940	2.2%26,951	2.1%27,383	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,443▼ −0.1 pp▲ +432– 0.0 pp▲ +1,011
Other Project-Based Programs	0.0%2	0.0%0	0.0%0	– 0.0 pp▼ −2– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▼ −2
Chicago citywide	0.5%5,850	0.4%4,447	0.3%3,564	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,286▼ −0.1 pp▼ −883▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,403

Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category	Ward 10
Average Household Income	$15,741
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$380
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,513
Below 30% of Area Median Income	85.4%2,306
With Children	50.4%1,361
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	24.9%672
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this ward. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this ward. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this ward.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Average Household Income	$15,741	$17,032	▼ -$1,291	43/50
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$380	$425	▼ -$45	45/50
Average Monthly Government Spending	$1,513	$1,389	▲ +$124	10/50
Below 30% of Area Median Income	85.4%2,306	83.0%77,427	▲ +2.4 pp	8/50
With Children	50.4%1,361	31.0%28,919	▲ +19.4 pp	5/50
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	24.9%672	32.0%29,852	▼ -7.1 pp	49/50
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this ward. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this ward. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this ward.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)

	2014	2019	2025	2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income	$11,423	$13,498	$15,736	▲ +$4,313▲ +$2,238▲ +$2,075
Chicago citywide	$12,156	$13,665	$17,032	▲ +$4,876▲ +$3,367▲ +$1,509
Average Tenant-Paid Rent	$257	$320	$380	▲ +$123▲ +$60▲ +$63
Chicago citywide	$310	$340	$425	▲ +$115▲ +$85▲ +$30
Average Monthly Government Spending	$966	$1,163	$1,512	▲ +$546▲ +$348▲ +$198
Chicago citywide	$916	$1,017	$1,389	▲ +$473▲ +$372▲ +$101
Below 30% of Area Median Income	82.2%—	80.8%—	85.4%—	▲ +3.2 pp—▲ +4.6 pp—▼ −1.4 pp—
Chicago citywide	80.0%—	81.0%—	83.0%—	▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +2.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children	—	—	50.3%—	——————
Chicago citywide	—	—	31.0%—	——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability	27.9%—	27.0%—	24.9%—	▼ −3.0 pp—▼ −2.1 pp—▼ −0.8 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category	Ward 10
Total Tree Canopy	13.6%1,527 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	35.5%3,973 acres
Natural Open Surfaces	50.9%5,702 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Total Tree Canopy	13.6%1,527 acres	18.4%25,934 acres	▼ -4.7%	37/50
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy)	35.5%3,973 acres	60.2%84,955 acres	▼ -24.7%	50/50
Natural Open Surfaces	50.9%5,702 acres	21.5%30,331 acres	▲ +29.4%	1/50
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category	Ward 10
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	17.1% ±3.2 pp8,872 ±1,670
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	48.7% ±3.8 pp25,307 ±1,957
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	34.2% ±3.5 pp17,776 ±1,799
Homes Without Air Conditioning	6.2%3,208
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	17.1%±3.2 pp8,872±1,670	26.1%±0.5 pp708,175±13,883	▼ -9.0%	47/50
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	48.7%±3.8 pp25,307±1,957	44.1%±0.6 pp1,195,501±15,477	▲ +4.6%	6/50
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors	34.2%±3.5 pp17,776±1,799	29.8%±0.5 pp807,550±13,776	▲ +4.4%	16/50
Homes Without Air Conditioning	6.2%3,208	4.2%114,618	▲ +1.9%	8/50
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates and do not have a margin of error.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category	Ward 10
Drove Alone	71.0% ±4.0 pp12,546 ±702
Carpooled	12.3% ±2.2 pp2,177 ±383
Public Transit	11.1% ±2.0 pp1,957 ±346
Walked	2.9% ±1.1 pp504 ±193
Bikes	0.4% ±0.5 pp79 ±90
Other Commute Mode	1.7% ±1.5 pp293 ±265
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Drove Alone	71.0%±4.0 pp12,546±702	56.6%±0.4 pp772,696±5,998	▲ +14.4%	7/50
Carpooled	12.3%±2.2 pp2,177±383	9.3%±0.3 pp126,918±3,980	▲ +3.0%	11/50
Public Transit	11.1%±2.0 pp1,957±346	22.4%±0.4 pp305,691±6,011	▼ -11.3%	45/50
Walked	2.9%±1.1 pp504±193	7.3%±0.3 pp100,269±3,456	▼ -4.5%	29/50
Bikes	0.4%±0.5 pp79±90	1.8%±0.1 pp24,441±1,693	▼ -1.3%	34/50
Other Commute Mode	1.7%±1.5 pp293±265	2.5%±0.1 pp34,356±1,772	▼ -0.9%	16/50
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category	Ward 10
Average Commute Time (minutes)	37 min±1.8 min
Less Than 15 Minutes	11.0% ±1.6 pp1,962 ±289
15–29 Minutes	23.4% ±2.7 pp4,155 ±486
30–44 Minutes	27.1% ±3.3 pp4,818 ±582
45–59 Minutes	17.1% ±2.7 pp3,043 ±472
60 Minutes or More	21.4% ±3.5 pp3,801 ±631
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes)	37 min±1.8 min	33 min±0.2 min	▲ +4 min	8/50
Less Than 15 Minutes	11.0%±1.6 pp1,962±289	13.0%±0.3 pp140,252±3,438	▼ -2.0%	27/50
15–29 Minutes	23.4%±2.7 pp4,155±486	29.9%±0.5 pp322,586±5,056	▼ -6.6%	46/50
30–44 Minutes	27.1%±3.3 pp4,818±582	29.6%±0.4 pp318,782±4,584	▼ -2.5%	36/50
45–59 Minutes	17.1%±2.7 pp3,043±472	14.0%±0.3 pp151,451±3,075	▲ +3.1%	8/50
60 Minutes or More	21.4%±3.5 pp3,801±631	13.4%±0.3 pp144,940±3,715	▲ +7.9%	4/50
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category	Ward 10
Average Vehicles per Household	1.38±0.08
Households With No Vehicle	19.9% ±2.2 pp3,730 ±413
Households With 1 Vehicle	39.7% ±3.4 pp7,421 ±645
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	40.4% ±3.3 pp7,556 ±612
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Average Vehicles per Household	1.38±0.08	1.12±0.01	▲ +0.26	15/50
Households With No Vehicle	19.9%±2.2 pp3,730±413	26.6%±0.4 pp308,497±5,087	▼ -6.7%	33/50
Households With 1 Vehicle	39.7%±3.4 pp7,421±645	45.2%±0.4 pp524,900±5,145	▼ -5.6%	43/50
Households With 2 or More Vehicles	40.4%±3.3 pp7,556±612	28.2%±0.4 pp326,808±4,200	▲ +12.2%	15/50
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where Ward 10 Residents Work

Category	Ward 10
Loop	18.1%3,612
Near North Side	5.1%1,019
Near West Side	4.2%841
South Deering	2.7%536
East Side	2.2%436
All other city neighborhoods	23.5%4,694
Outside the city	44.2%8,822
↳ South Holland village, IL	1.4%289
↳ Lansing village, IL	1.1%211
↳ Alsip village, IL	1.0%191
↳ Calumet City city, IL	0.8%165
↳ Bedford Park village, IL	0.8%160
↳ All other Illinois locations	31.1%6,210
Out of state	8.0%1,596
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for ward 10 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference
Loop	18.1%3,612	21.5%259,168	▼ -3.4%
Near North Side	5.1%1,019	9.1%109,334	▼ -4.0%
Near West Side	4.2%841	6.7%80,119	▼ -2.4%
South Deering	2.7%536	0.2%2,816	▲ +2.5%
East Side	2.2%436	0.1%855	▲ +2.1%
All other city neighborhoods	23.5%4,694	21.1%253,663	▲ +2.5%
Outside the city	44.2%8,822	35.9%432,365	▲ +8.3%
↳ South Holland village, IL	1.4%289	0.2%1,994	▲ +1.3%
↳ Lansing village, IL	1.1%211	0.1%1,223	▲ +1.0%
↳ Alsip village, IL	1.0%191	0.3%3,598	▲ +0.7%
↳ Calumet City city, IL	0.8%165	0.1%1,163	▲ +0.7%
↳ Bedford Park village, IL	0.8%160	0.6%6,897	▲ +0.2%
↳ All other Illinois locations	31.1%6,210	27.4%330,297	▲ +3.7%
Out of state	8.0%1,596	2.2%26,136	▲ +5.8%
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for ward 10 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Loop	16.7%3,055	16.7%3,220	18.1%3,612	▲ +1.4 pp▲ +557▲ +1.4 pp▲ +392– 0.0 pp▲ +165
Chicago citywide	20.0%224,635	21.0%252,791	21.5%259,168	▲ +1.5 pp▲ +34,533▲ +0.5 pp▲ +6,377▲ +1.0 pp▲ +28,156
Near North Side	4.7%867	5.2%994	5.1%1,019	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +152– 0.0 pp▲ +25▲ +0.4 pp▲ +127
Chicago citywide	8.2%92,142	9.4%112,858	9.1%109,334	▲ +0.9 pp▲ +17,192▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3,524▲ +1.2 pp▲ +20,716
Near West Side	4.4%806	4.1%792	4.2%841	▼ −0.2 pp▲ +35▲ +0.1 pp▲ +49▼ −0.3 pp▼ −14
Chicago citywide	6.2%69,083	6.6%79,757	6.7%80,119	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +11,036– 0.0 pp▲ +362▲ +0.5 pp▲ +10,674
South Deering	1.9%347	2.2%427	2.7%536	▲ +0.8 pp▲ +189▲ +0.5 pp▲ +109▲ +0.3 pp▲ +80
Chicago citywide	0.2%1,817	0.2%1,951	0.2%2,816	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +999▲ +0.1 pp▲ +865– 0.0 pp▲ +134
East Side	1.6%300	2.5%480	2.2%436	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +136▼ −0.3 pp▼ −44▲ +0.9 pp▲ +180
Chicago citywide	0.1%671	0.1%811	0.1%855	– 0.0 pp▲ +184– 0.0 pp▲ +44– 0.0 pp▲ +140
All other city neighborhoods	25.0%4,574	25.4%4,890	23.5%4,694	▼ −1.5 pp▲ +120▼ −1.8 pp▼ −196▲ +0.4 pp▲ +316
Chicago citywide	22.9%257,015	21.5%259,132	21.1%253,663	▼ −1.8 pp▼ −3,352▼ −0.5 pp▼ −5,469▼ −1.4 pp▲ +2,117
Outside the city	45.2%8,267	44.0%8,480	44.2%8,822	▼ −1.0 pp▲ +555▲ +0.2 pp▲ +342▼ −1.2 pp▲ +213
Chicago citywide	36.8%412,807	35.7%430,135	35.9%432,365	▼ −0.9 pp▲ +19,558▲ +0.2 pp▲ +2,230▼ −1.0 pp▲ +17,328
South Holland village, IL	1.6%295	1.7%322	1.4%289	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −6▼ −0.2 pp▼ −33▲ +0.1 pp▲ +27
Chicago citywide	0.2%1,900	0.2%1,991	0.2%1,994	– 0.0 pp▲ +94– 0.0 pp▲ +3– 0.0 pp▲ +91
Lansing village, IL	1.6%287	1.3%254	1.1%211	▼ −0.5 pp▼ −76▼ −0.3 pp▼ −43▼ −0.3 pp▼ −33
Chicago citywide	0.1%1,351	0.1%1,287	0.1%1,223	– 0.0 pp▼ −128– 0.0 pp▼ −64– 0.0 pp▼ −64
Alsip village, IL	1.0%185	1.2%238	1.0%191	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +6▼ −0.3 pp▼ −47▲ +0.2 pp▲ +53
Chicago citywide	0.3%3,503	0.4%4,279	0.3%3,598	– 0.0 pp▲ +95▼ −0.1 pp▼ −681– 0.0 pp▲ +776
Calumet City city, IL	1.3%230	1.0%184	0.8%165	▼ −0.4 pp▼ −65▼ −0.1 pp▼ −19▼ −0.3 pp▼ −46
Chicago citywide	0.1%1,502	0.1%1,188	0.1%1,163	– 0.0 pp▼ −339– 0.0 pp▼ −25– 0.0 pp▼ −314
Bedford Park village, IL	0.8%152	0.7%138	0.8%160	– 0.0 pp▲ +8▲ +0.1 pp▲ +22▼ −0.1 pp▼ −14
Chicago citywide	0.8%8,547	0.7%8,008	0.6%6,897	▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,650▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,111▼ −0.1 pp▼ −539
All other Illinois locations	29.5%5,402	29.1%5,619	31.1%6,210	▲ +1.6 pp▲ +808▲ +2.0 pp▲ +591▼ −0.4 pp▲ +217
Chicago citywide	28.0%314,112	27.1%326,235	27.4%330,297	▼ −0.5 pp▲ +16,185▲ +0.3 pp▲ +4,062▼ −0.9 pp▲ +12,123
Out of state	9.3%1,695	8.9%1,709	8.0%1,596	▼ −1.3 pp▼ −99▼ −0.9 pp▼ −113▼ −0.4 pp▲ +14
Chicago citywide	2.2%24,577	2.3%27,198	2.2%26,136	– 0.0 pp▲ +1,559▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,062▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,621

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Ward 10

Category	Ward 10
East Side	5.5%766
Hegewisch	2.6%364
South Chicago	2.0%273
South Deering	1.9%262
Roseland	1.6%215
All other city neighborhoods	18.9%2,620
Outside the city	67.5%9,356
↳ Calumet City city, IL	2.7%376
↳ Lansing village, IL	2.4%328
↳ Dolton village, IL	1.8%245
↳ South Holland village, IL	1.6%224
↳ Park Forest village, IL	0.9%126
↳ All other Illinois locations	27.2%3,774
Out of state	30.9%4,283
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in ward 10; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference
East Side	5.5%766	0.3%4,760	▲ +5.2%
Hegewisch	2.6%364	0.2%2,384	▲ +2.5%
South Chicago	2.0%273	0.4%5,630	▲ +1.6%
South Deering	1.9%262	0.2%3,201	▲ +1.7%
Roseland	1.6%215	0.6%8,705	▲ +1.0%
All other city neighborhoods	18.9%2,620	37.1%542,952	▼ -18.2%
Outside the city	67.5%9,356	47.2%691,556	▲ +20.3%
↳ Calumet City city, IL	2.7%376	0.3%4,803	▲ +2.4%
↳ Lansing village, IL	2.4%328	0.2%3,486	▲ +2.1%
↳ Dolton village, IL	1.8%245	0.2%3,021	▲ +1.6%
↳ South Holland village, IL	1.6%224	0.2%2,892	▲ +1.4%
↳ Park Forest village, IL	0.9%126	0.2%2,341	▲ +0.7%
↳ All other Illinois locations	27.2%3,774	37.0%540,957	▼ -9.7%
Out of state	30.9%4,283	4.9%72,124	▲ +26.0%
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common Illinois municipalities outside the city for people working in ward 10; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other Illinois locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this ward. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023

	2014	2019	2023	2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
East Side	5.5%685	6.5%804	5.5%766	– 0.0 pp▲ +81▼ −1.0 pp▼ −38▲ +1.0 pp▲ +119
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,299	0.3%4,660	0.3%4,760	– 0.0 pp▲ +461– 0.0 pp▲ +100– 0.0 pp▲ +361
Hegewisch	2.2%279	2.7%337	2.6%364	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +85▼ −0.1 pp▲ +27▲ +0.5 pp▲ +58
Chicago citywide	0.2%2,096	0.2%2,256	0.2%2,384	– 0.0 pp▲ +288– 0.0 pp▲ +128– 0.0 pp▲ +160
South Chicago	2.3%283	2.0%249	2.0%273	▼ −0.3 pp▼ −10▼ −0.1 pp▲ +24▼ −0.3 pp▼ −34
Chicago citywide	0.4%5,747	0.4%5,617	0.4%5,630	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −117– 0.0 pp▲ +13– 0.0 pp▼ −130
South Deering	2.0%247	2.2%268	1.9%262	▼ −0.1 pp▲ +15▼ −0.3 pp▼ −6▲ +0.2 pp▲ +21
Chicago citywide	0.2%3,131	0.2%3,223	0.2%3,201	– 0.0 pp▲ +70– 0.0 pp▼ −22– 0.0 pp▲ +92
Roseland	1.3%167	1.3%154	1.6%215	▲ +0.2 pp▲ +48▲ +0.3 pp▲ +61▼ −0.1 pp▼ −13
Chicago citywide	0.7%8,869	0.6%8,486	0.6%8,705	▼ −0.1 pp▼ −164– 0.0 pp▲ +219▼ −0.1 pp▼ −383
All other city neighborhoods	20.1%2,500	17.9%2,209	18.9%2,620	▼ −1.2 pp▲ +120▲ +1.0 pp▲ +411▼ −2.2 pp▼ −291
Chicago citywide	38.3%503,539	38.2%541,560	37.1%542,952	▼ −1.2 pp▲ +39,413▼ −1.1 pp▲ +1,392▼ −0.1 pp▲ +38,021
Outside the city	66.5%8,249	67.4%8,295	67.5%9,356	▲ +1.1 pp▲ +1,107▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,061▲ +0.9 pp▲ +46
Chicago citywide	45.9%603,753	45.4%642,891	47.2%691,556	▲ +1.3 pp▲ +87,803▲ +1.9 pp▲ +48,665▼ −0.6 pp▲ +39,138
Calumet City city, IL	2.7%333	2.4%298	2.7%376	– 0.0 pp▲ +43▲ +0.3 pp▲ +78▼ −0.3 pp▼ −35
Chicago citywide	0.3%4,281	0.3%4,579	0.3%4,803	– 0.0 pp▲ +522– 0.0 pp▲ +224– 0.0 pp▲ +298
Lansing village, IL	1.9%238	2.3%286	2.4%328	▲ +0.4 pp▲ +90– 0.0 pp▲ +42▲ +0.4 pp▲ +48
Chicago citywide	0.2%3,156	0.2%3,077	0.2%3,486	– 0.0 pp▲ +330– 0.0 pp▲ +409– 0.0 pp▼ −79
Dolton village, IL	1.2%153	1.5%180	1.8%245	▲ +0.5 pp▲ +92▲ +0.3 pp▲ +65▲ +0.2 pp▲ +27
Chicago citywide	0.2%3,248	0.2%3,051	0.2%3,021	– 0.0 pp▼ −227– 0.0 pp▼ −30– 0.0 pp▼ −197
South Holland village, IL	0.9%108	1.3%155	1.6%224	▲ +0.7 pp▲ +116▲ +0.4 pp▲ +69▲ +0.4 pp▲ +47
Chicago citywide	0.2%2,615	0.2%2,689	0.2%2,892	– 0.0 pp▲ +277– 0.0 pp▲ +203– 0.0 pp▲ +74
Park Forest village, IL	0.7%81	0.8%99	0.9%126	▲ +0.3 pp▲ +45▲ +0.1 pp▲ +27▲ +0.2 pp▲ +18
Chicago citywide	0.2%2,261	0.2%2,235	0.2%2,341	– 0.0 pp▲ +80– 0.0 pp▲ +106– 0.0 pp▼ −26
All other Illinois locations	31.3%3,884	28.5%3,516	27.2%3,774	▼ −4.1 pp▼ −110▼ −1.3 pp▲ +258▼ −2.7 pp▼ −368
Chicago citywide	35.6%467,892	35.1%497,967	37.0%540,957	▲ +1.4 pp▲ +73,065▲ +1.8 pp▲ +42,990▼ −0.5 pp▲ +30,075
Out of state	27.6%3,423	30.2%3,721	30.9%4,283	▲ +3.3 pp▲ +860▲ +0.7 pp▲ +562▲ +2.6 pp▲ +298
Chicago citywide	4.9%63,789	4.8%68,287	4.9%72,124	▲ +0.1 pp▲ +8,335▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,837– 0.0 pp▲ +4,498

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category	Ward 10
No Computer or Smartphone	7.0% ±1.5 pp1,306 ±275
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	17.8% ±2.3 pp3,322 ±431
Desktop or Laptop Available	67.1% ±3.3 pp12,546 ±608
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
No Computer or Smartphone	7.0%±1.5 pp1,306±275	5.1%±0.2 pp58,709±2,246	▲ +1.9%	17/50
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop	17.8%±2.3 pp3,322±431	10.4%±0.3 pp120,218±3,642	▲ +7.4%	9/50
Desktop or Laptop Available	67.1%±3.3 pp12,546±608	79.7%±0.4 pp924,956±4,919	▼ -12.7%	41/50
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category	Ward 10
Has Internet Access	91.9% ±2.0 pp17,196 ±367
Cellular Data Plan Only	19.2% ±2.8 pp3,598 ±528
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	2.4% ±1.0 pp458 ±179
No Internet Access	8.1% ±1.5 pp1,511 ±281
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Has Internet Access	91.9%±2.0 pp17,196±367	93.1%±0.3 pp1,080,419±3,310	▼ -1.2%	30/50
Cellular Data Plan Only	19.2%±2.8 pp3,598±528	12.5%±0.3 pp145,219±3,463	▲ +6.7%	7/50
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription	2.4%±1.0 pp458±179	3.9%±0.2 pp45,350±1,940	▼ -1.5%	36/50
No Internet Access	8.1%±1.5 pp1,511±281	6.9%±0.2 pp79,786±2,730	▲ +1.2%	21/50
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category	Ward 10
Uninsured Residents	11.3% ±1.3 pp5,869 ±695
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	2.3% ±1.4 pp1,189 ±752
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	18.9% ±2.3 pp9,810 ±1,197
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	1.2% ±1.4 pp647 ±727
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Uninsured Residents	11.3%±1.3 pp5,869±695	9.8%±0.2 pp264,391±5,512	▲ +1.5%	21/50
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19	2.3%±1.4 pp1,189±752	3.9%±0.3 pp104,687±8,689	▼ -1.6%	38/50
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64	18.9%±2.3 pp9,810±1,197	13.3%±0.3 pp361,430±8,202	▲ +5.6%	11/50
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older	1.2%±1.4 pp647±727	1.7%±0.3 pp46,718±7,559	▼ -0.5%	26/50
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category	Ward 10
Insured (Any Coverage)	88.7% ±1.3 pp46,044 ±694
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	34.9% ±2.0 pp18,113 ±1,028
Direct-Purchase Insurance	5.8% ±1.1 pp3,013 ±546
Medicare	13.6% ±1.2 pp7,059 ±603
Medicaid	36.8% ±2.3 pp19,122 ±1,185
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.2% ±0.4 pp108 ±189
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	5.1% ±1.3 pp2,666 ±657
Uninsured	11.3% ±1.3 pp5,864 ±694
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Insured (Any Coverage)	88.7%±1.3 pp46,044±694	90.2%±0.2 pp2,424,871±5,689	▼ -1.5%	30/50
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance	34.9%±2.0 pp18,113±1,028	51.2%±0.4 pp1,376,912±9,468	▼ -16.4%	41/50
Direct-Purchase Insurance	5.8%±1.1 pp3,013±546	8.5%±0.2 pp227,424±5,112	▼ -2.7%	44/50
Medicare	13.6%±1.2 pp7,059±603	12.6%±0.2 pp339,804±4,911	▲ +1.0%	20/50
Medicaid	36.8%±2.3 pp19,122±1,185	22.2%±0.3 pp596,931±7,773	▲ +14.6%	10/50
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA)	0.2%±0.4 pp108±189	0.3%±0.0 pp7,201±787	▼ -0.1%	27/50
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified	5.1%±1.3 pp2,666±657	3.8%±0.1 pp102,777±3,544	▲ +1.3%	12/50
Uninsured	11.3%±1.3 pp5,864±694	9.8%±0.2 pp262,018±5,689	▲ +1.5%	21/50
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category	Ward 10
Adults With at Least One Disability	15.5% ±1.3 pp5,816 ±505
Mobility Disability	9.4% ±1.1 pp3,536 ±431
Hearing Disability	3.2% ±0.7 pp1,199 ±270
Vision Disability	3.2% ±0.7 pp1,198 ±260
Cognitive Disability	4.0% ±0.8 pp1,489 ±296
Self-Care Disability	3.1% ±0.7 pp1,167 ±257
Independent Living Disability	7.8% ±1.0 pp2,936 ±386
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability	15.5%±1.3 pp5,816±505	14.0%±0.2 pp303,665±4,797	▲ +1.4%	18/50
Mobility Disability	9.4%±1.1 pp3,536±431	7.6%±0.2 pp163,666±3,398	▲ +1.8%	16/50
Hearing Disability	3.2%±0.7 pp1,199±270	2.8%±0.1 pp61,430±2,337	▲ +0.3%	22/50
Vision Disability	3.2%±0.7 pp1,198±260	3.0%±0.1 pp64,544±2,269	▲ +0.2%	21/50
Cognitive Disability	4.0%±0.8 pp1,489±296	5.2%±0.1 pp112,824±2,939	▼ -1.3%	38/50
Self-Care Disability	3.1%±0.7 pp1,167±257	2.7%±0.1 pp57,758±2,261	▲ +0.4%	17/50
Independent Living Disability	7.8%±1.0 pp2,936±386	5.7%±0.2 pp123,651±3,247	▲ +2.1%	12/50
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category	Ward 10
Arthritis	22.7%9,080
High Blood Pressure	34.3%13,719
Cancer	5.1%2,020
Current Asthma	10.5%4,204
Coronary Heart Disease	6.6%2,639
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	7.7%3,074
Diabetes	16.4%6,544
High Cholesterol	34.8%13,921
Obesity	38.5%15,421
Stroke	4.3%1,715
Lost All Natural Teeth	4.1%1,640
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Arthritis	22.7%9,080	19.6%409,178	▲ +3.1%	16/50
High Blood Pressure	34.3%13,719	29.7%620,030	▲ +4.6%	14/50
Cancer	5.1%2,020	5.0%104,382	▲ +0.1%	21/50
Current Asthma	10.5%4,204	10.2%212,940	▲ +0.3%	18/50
Coronary Heart Disease	6.6%2,639	4.8%100,207	▲ +1.8%	9/50
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)	7.7%3,074	5.5%114,820	▲ +2.2%	13/50
Diabetes	16.4%6,544	12.0%250,517	▲ +4.4%	13/50
High Cholesterol	34.8%13,921	31.6%659,696	▲ +3.2%	7/50
Obesity	38.5%15,421	32.6%680,572	▲ +5.9%	14/50
Stroke	4.3%1,715	3.3%68,892	▲ +1.0%	14/50
Lost All Natural Teeth	4.1%1,640	2.5%52,249	▲ +1.6%	12/50
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category	Ward 10
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	16.5%6,611
Current Cigarette Smoking	15.8%6,318
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	35.3%14,129
Short Sleep Duration	40.5%16,201
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days	16.5%6,611	19.0%396,652	▼ -2.5%	35/50
Current Cigarette Smoking	15.8%6,318	11.9%248,430	▲ +3.9%	12/50
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity	35.3%14,129	24.7%515,648	▲ +10.6%	6/50
Short Sleep Duration	40.5%16,201	37.8%789,129	▲ +2.7%	15/50
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category	Ward 10
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	31.1%12,457
Frequent Physical Distress	16.1%6,429
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health	31.1%12,457	21.1%440,493	▲ +10.0%	8/50
Frequent Physical Distress	16.1%6,429	11.8%246,342	▲ +4.3%	4/50
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category	Ward 10
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	73.3%29,323
Routine Checkup in Past Year	75.9%30,370
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	84.1%33,630
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	49.8%19,918
Dental Visit in Past Year	48.0%19,189
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	70.3%28,112
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure	73.3%29,323	72.5%1,513,542	▲ +0.8%	20/50
Routine Checkup in Past Year	75.9%30,370	76.2%1,590,785	▼ -0.3%	25/50
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years	84.1%33,630	86.2%1,799,549	▼ -2.1%	40/50
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening	49.8%19,918	55.8%1,164,905	▼ -6.0%	43/50
Dental Visit in Past Year	48.0%19,189	58.4%1,219,184	▼ -10.4%	42/50
Mammogram in Past 2 Years	70.3%28,112	74.2%1,549,032	▼ -3.9%	45/50
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category	Ward 10
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	19.1%7,625
Frequent Mental Distress	17.8%7,140
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	31.4%12,556
Loneliness	37.7%15,072
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Category	Ward 10	City	Difference	Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression	19.1%7,625	19.1%398,740	0%	24/50
Frequent Mental Distress	17.8%7,140	16.0%334,023	▲ +1.8%	11/50
Lack of Social/Emotional Support	31.4%12,556	28.2%588,716	▲ +3.2%	19/50
Loneliness	37.7%15,072	35.8%747,377	▲ +1.9%	17/50
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Compare All Wards

Chicago City Council Ward 10

Ward 10 at a Glance

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Age Distribution

Educational Attainment

Population

Household Size

Marital Status

Language Spoken at Home

English Proficiency

Household Composition

Children by Household Type

Veteran Status

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Poverty Status

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Occupation

Industry of Employment

Class of Worker

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Earnings of All Workers

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 10

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in Ward 10 in Lower-Income Families

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in Ward 10

Local Businesses

Jobs in Ward 10

Industry of Jobs in Ward 10

Earnings of Jobs in Ward 10

Jobs in Ward 10 by Firm Age

Jobs in Ward 10 by Firm Size

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

College Enrollment

Student Digital Access

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Year Moved Into Current Home

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Housing Vacancy Status

Housing Age

Housing Units by Building Size

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Overcrowded Housing

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Monthly Housing Costs

Rent

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Home Values

Federal Housing Assistance

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Commute Time

Household Vehicle Access

Where Ward 10 Residents Work

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in Ward 10

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Household Internet Access

Health

Health Insurance

Health Insurance Coverage Types