Los Angeles City Council District 9 Demographics, Housing & Census Data

Los Angeles City Council District 9 Census and ACS demographic tables: population, race, age, income, poverty, rent, housing types, single-family homes, commute, education, internet access, health insurance, and disability.

Los Angeles City Council District 9

Curren D. Price, Jr.
Curren D. Price, Jr.
District 9 Council Member
One-Page District Summary District Website
Average Geographic Mismatch Error : 0.05 p.p. Geographic mismatch error comes from Census geographic boundaries not perfectly aligning with district boundaries. We can test how much mismatch error skews district statistics for a subset of variables. For this district , the average error is 0.05 percentage points. More detail is available on the district geography page , and the methodology page explains geographic mismatch error in more detail.

District 9 at a Glance

Time period?Historical estimates use this profile's current boundaries, held constant across periods; they do not reflect the boundaries that were in effect at the time. Comparing
Values as
Show as
Add to every table
Showing Chart vs. Los Angeles ± Margin of error

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category District 9
Hispanic 80.8% ±1.2 pp203,222 ±3,039
White 3.3% ±0.3 pp8,361 ±838
Black 10.8% ±0.8 pp27,122 ±2,096
Asian 3.2% ±0.3 pp8,069 ±797
Other or Multi-racial 1.8% ±0.3 pp4,643 ±860
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Hispanic 80.8%±1.2 pp203,222±3,039 47.2%±0.2 pp1,820,397±8,107 ▲ +33.6% 1/15
White 3.3%±0.3 pp8,361±838 28.1%±0.2 pp1,082,393±7,330 ▼ -24.7% 15/15
Black 10.8%±0.8 pp27,122±2,096 8.1%±0.1 pp311,633±4,801 ▲ +2.7% 3/15
Asian 3.2%±0.3 pp8,069±797 11.9%±0.1 pp460,422±5,784 ▼ -8.7% 14/15
Other or Multi-racial 1.8%±0.3 pp4,643±860 4.7%±0.1 pp182,418±4,965 ▼ -2.9% 15/15
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Hispanic 78.6% ±0.8 pp193,868 ±2,014 80.4% ±0.8 pp213,625 ±2,086 80.8% ±1.2 pp203,222 ±3,039 ▲ +2.3 pp▲ +9,354▲ +0.4 pp▼ −10,403▲ +1.9 pp▲ +19,757
Los Angeles citywide 48.6% ±0.2 pp1,876,711 ±6,363 48.5% ±0.2 pp1,922,409 ±6,867 47.2% ±0.2 pp1,820,397 ±8,107 ▼ −1.4 pp▼ −56,314▼ −1.3 pp▼ −102,012▼ −0.1 pp▲ +45,698
White 3.5% ±0.4 pp8,734 ±908 3.0% ±0.2 pp7,984 ±599 3.3% ±0.3 pp8,361 ±838 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −373▲ +0.3 pp▲ +377▼ −0.5 pp▼ −750
Los Angeles citywide 28.5% ±0.1 pp1,100,413 ±5,207 28.5% ±0.1 pp1,129,956 ±5,063 28.1% ±0.2 pp1,082,393 ±7,330 ▼ −0.4 pp▼ −18,020▼ −0.4 pp▼ −47,563– 0.0 pp▲ +29,543
Black 14.0% ±0.6 pp34,499 ±1,468 12.8% ±0.7 pp33,932 ±1,728 10.8% ±0.8 pp27,122 ±2,096 ▼ −3.2 pp▼ −7,377▼ −2.0 pp▼ −6,810▼ −1.2 pp▼ −567
Los Angeles citywide 8.9% ±0.1 pp341,960 ±4,238 8.6% ±0.1 pp341,750 ±4,634 8.1% ±0.1 pp311,633 ±4,801 ▼ −0.8 pp▼ −30,327▼ −0.5 pp▼ −30,117▼ −0.2 pp▼ −210
Asian 2.9% ±0.3 pp7,217 ±676 2.7% ±0.2 pp7,196 ±554 3.2% ±0.3 pp8,069 ±797 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +852▲ +0.5 pp▲ +873▼ −0.2 pp▼ −21
Los Angeles citywide 11.4% ±0.1 pp439,382 ±4,465 11.5% ±0.1 pp454,688 ±4,897 11.9% ±0.1 pp460,422 ±5,784 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +21,040▲ +0.5 pp▲ +5,734▲ +0.1 pp▲ +15,306
Other or Multi-racial 1.0% ±0.2 pp2,458 ±450 1.1% ±0.2 pp2,926 ±458 1.8% ±0.3 pp4,643 ±860 ▲ +0.9 pp▲ +2,185▲ +0.7 pp▲ +1,717▲ +0.1 pp▲ +468
Los Angeles citywide 2.7% ±0.1 pp103,744 ±3,093 3.0% ±0.1 pp118,133 ±3,478 4.7% ±0.1 pp182,418 ±4,965 ▲ +2.0 pp▲ +78,674▲ +1.8 pp▲ +64,285▲ +0.3 pp▲ +14,389

Age Distribution

Category District 9
Under 5 5.7% ±0.4 pp14,389 ±969
5-17 20.0% ±0.5 pp50,335 ±1,367
18-24 15.7% ±0.5 pp39,416 ±1,319
25-44 28.8% ±0.6 pp72,432 ±1,422
45-64 22.1% ±0.5 pp55,688 ±1,194
65-74 5.2% ±0.3 pp13,074 ±871
75-84 1.7% ±0.2 pp4,249 ±469
85+ 0.7% ±0.1 pp1,833 ±333
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Under 5 5.7%±0.4 pp14,389±969 5.0%±0.1 pp193,588±3,913 ▲ +0.7% 2/15
5-17 20.0%±0.5 pp50,335±1,367 14.1%±0.1 pp545,575±5,441 ▲ +5.9% 1/15
18-24 15.7%±0.5 pp39,416±1,319 9.5%±0.1 pp364,975±4,769 ▲ +6.2% 2/15
25-44 28.8%±0.6 pp72,432±1,422 32.7%±0.2 pp1,261,487±6,697 ▼ -3.9% 11/15
45-64 22.1%±0.5 pp55,688±1,194 24.4%±0.1 pp942,048±5,753 ▼ -2.3% 14/15
65-74 5.2%±0.3 pp13,074±871 8.4%±0.1 pp323,245±3,954 ▼ -3.2% 15/15
75-84 1.7%±0.2 pp4,249±469 4.0%±0.1 pp153,663±2,684 ▼ -2.3% 15/15
85+ 0.7%±0.1 pp1,833±333 1.9%±0.1 pp72,682±2,194 ▼ -1.2% 15/15
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category District 9
No High School Diploma 49.2% ±1.1 pp72,472 ±1,569
High School Diploma or GED 22.4% ±0.9 pp32,916 ±1,359
Some College or Associate's Degree 18.7% ±0.8 pp27,580 ±1,207
Bachelor's Degree 7.0% ±0.6 pp10,307 ±838
Graduate Degree 2.7% ±0.4 pp3,969 ±530
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
No High School Diploma 49.2%±1.1 pp72,472±1,569 20.4%±0.2 pp560,441±5,874 ▲ +28.9% 1/15
High School Diploma or GED 22.4%±0.9 pp32,916±1,359 18.5%±0.2 pp509,870±5,865 ▲ +3.8% 5/15
Some College or Associate's Degree 18.7%±0.8 pp27,580±1,207 22.7%±0.2 pp624,064±6,021 ▼ -3.9% 12/15
Bachelor's Degree 7.0%±0.6 pp10,307±838 24.9%±0.2 pp684,319±5,942 ▼ -17.9% 15/15
Graduate Degree 2.7%±0.4 pp3,969±530 13.6%±0.2 pp374,431±4,556 ▼ -10.9% 15/15
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category District 9
Total Population 251,417 ±5,552
Total Households 62,496 ±1,112
Population Density 19,292 ±426 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 Average District Difference
Total Population 251,417 257,156 ▼ −5,739
Total Households 62,496 95,942 ▼ −33,446
Population Density 19,292 people/sq mi 10,569 people/sq mi ▲ +8,723
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average district rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large districts. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category 2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19 Difference Rank
Total Population 246,775 ±3,578 265,663 ±3,677 251,417 ±5,552 ▲ +4,642 ±6,605▼ −14,246 ±6,659▲ +18,888 ±5,130 ▼ −10,733▲ +1,246▼ −5,739 14/157/1513/15
Average District 257,508 264,417 257,156 ▼ −352▼ −7,261▲ +6,909
Total Households 57,531 ±506 62,073 ±514 62,496 ±1,112 ▲ +4,965 ±1,222▲ +423 ±1,225▲ +4,542 ±721 ▼ −31,113▼ −30,176▼ −33,446 15/1515/1515/15
Average District 88,644 92,249 95,942 ▲ +7,298▲ +3,694▲ +3,604
Population Density (per sq mi) 18,936 ±275 20,385 ±282 19,292 ±426 ▲ +356▼ −1,093▲ +1,449 ▲ +8,300▲ +9,448▲ +8,723 1/151/151/15
Average District Density 10,636 10,937 10,569 ▼ −67▼ −368▲ +302

Household Size

Category District 9
Average Household Size 3.84±0.09
1-Person Households 17.4% ±1.1 pp10,903 ±686
2-Person Households 17.1% ±1.1 pp10,716 ±658
3-Person Households 16.5% ±1.1 pp10,319 ±659
4+ Person Households 48.9% ±1.4 pp30,559 ±887
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Average Household Size 3.84±0.09 2.61±0.02 ▲ +1.23 1/15
1-Person Households 17.4%±1.1 pp10,903±686 31.8%±0.3 pp458,302±3,959 ▼ -14.4% 14/15
2-Person Households 17.1%±1.1 pp10,716±658 29.2%±0.3 pp419,781±4,028 ▼ -12.0% 15/15
3-Person Households 16.5%±1.1 pp10,319±659 15.5%±0.2 pp222,553±3,314 ▲ +1.0% 8/15
4+ Person Households 48.9%±1.4 pp30,559±887 23.5%±0.3 pp338,461±4,045 ▲ +25.4% 1/15
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category District 9
Never Married 59.2% ±0.7 pp117,977 ±1,493
Married 29.3% ±0.6 pp58,354 ±1,197
Separated 3.2% ±0.3 pp6,319 ±634
Divorced 4.9% ±0.4 pp9,757 ±769
Widowed 3.5% ±0.3 pp6,943 ±588
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Never Married 59.2%±0.7 pp117,977±1,493 46.8%±0.2 pp1,520,630±7,726 ▲ +12.4% 1/15
Married 29.3%±0.6 pp58,354±1,197 38.5%±0.2 pp1,249,312±6,703 ▼ -9.2% 15/15
Separated 3.2%±0.3 pp6,319±634 2.3%±0.1 pp75,298±2,109 ▲ +0.9% 1/15
Divorced 4.9%±0.4 pp9,757±769 8.0%±0.1 pp260,053±4,066 ▼ -3.1% 15/15
Widowed 3.5%±0.3 pp6,943±588 4.4%±0.1 pp143,800±3,312 ▼ -0.9% 15/15
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category District 9
Speak English Only 22.4% ±0.8 pp52,977 ±1,957
Spanish 73.9% ±1.2 pp174,879 ±2,925
Other Languages 3.7% ±0.4 pp8,835 ±1,049
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this district, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Speak English Only 22.4%±0.8 pp52,977±1,957 43.6%±0.3 pp1,595,910±12,698 ▼ -21.2% 15/15
Spanish 73.9%±1.2 pp174,879±2,925 39.3%±0.3 pp1,439,364±9,227 ▲ +34.6% 1/15
Other Languages 3.7%±0.4 pp8,835±1,049 1.0%±0.1 pp36,540±2,239 ▲ +2.7% 6/15
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this district, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show
Category District 9
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 55.3% ±0.7 pp55.3%±0.7 pp130,973 ±1,758
Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents age 5+) 44.7% ±0.9 pp44.7%±0.9 pp106,055 ±2,170
↳ Speaks English Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 18.4% ±0.8 pp41.1%±1.5 pp43,603 ±1,802
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 16.9% ±0.7 pp37.8%±1.5 pp40,110 ±1,772
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 9.4% ±0.6 pp21.1%±1.2 pp22,342 ±1,322
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 55.3%±0.7 pp55.3%±0.7 pp130,973±1,758 75.0%±0.4 pp75.0%±0.4 pp2,746,425±15,454 ▼ -19.7%▼ -19.7% 15/15
Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents age 5+) 44.7%±0.9 pp44.7%±0.9 pp106,055±2,170 25.0%±0.3 pp25.0%±0.3 pp917,250±9,304 ▲ +19.7%▲ +19.7% 1/15
↳ Speaks English Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 18.4%±0.8 pp41.1%±1.5 pp43,603±1,802 11.4%±0.2 pp45.5%±0.4 pp417,261±5,774 ▲ +7.0%▼ -4.4% 1/1513/15
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 16.9%±0.7 pp37.8%±1.5 pp40,110±1,772 9.5%±0.2 pp37.9%±0.5 pp347,471±6,114 ▲ +7.4%▼ -0.1% 1/157/15
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 9.4%±0.6 pp21.1%±1.2 pp22,342±1,322 4.2%±0.1 pp16.6%±0.4 pp152,518±4,020 ▲ +5.3%▲ +4.4% 2/152/15
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category District 9
Married-Couple Households 34.7% ±1.3 pp21,671 ±832
Unmarried-Couple Households 12.0% ±0.9 pp7,500 ±586
One-Person Households 17.4% ±1.2 pp10,903 ±747
Other Household Types 35.9% ±2.7 pp22,422 ±1,695
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Married-Couple Households 34.7%±1.3 pp21,671±832 37.0%±0.3 pp531,842±3,893 ▼ -2.3% 9/15
Unmarried-Couple Households 12.0%±0.9 pp7,500±586 8.8%±0.2 pp125,985±2,722 ▲ +3.2% 1/15
One-Person Households 17.4%±1.2 pp10,903±747 31.8%±0.3 pp458,302±4,544 ▼ -14.4% 14/15
Other Household Types 35.9%±2.7 pp22,422±1,695 22.4%±0.5 pp322,968±7,912 ▲ +13.4% 1/15
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category District 9
Children in Married-Couple Households 43.6% ±2.4 pp28,148 ±1,527
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 18.7% ±2.1 pp12,105 ±1,353
Children in Single-Mother Households 30.7% ±2.2 pp19,819 ±1,436
Children in Single-Father Households 7.0% ±1.2 pp4,522 ±756
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households 43.6%±2.4 pp28,148±1,527 60.7%±0.6 pp447,843±4,339 ▼ -17.2% 15/15
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 18.7%±2.1 pp12,105±1,353 10.9%±0.5 pp80,543±3,499 ▲ +7.8% 1/15
Children in Single-Mother Households 30.7%±2.2 pp19,819±1,436 22.7%±0.7 pp167,403±4,794 ▲ +8.0% 2/15
Children in Single-Father Households 7.0%±1.2 pp4,522±756 5.6%±0.3 pp41,515±2,120 ▲ +1.4% 2/15
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show
Category District 9
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 0.8% ±0.2 pp0.8%±0.2 pp1,537 ±323
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 34.1% ±15.5 pp0.3%±0.1 pp524 ±238
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 8.0% ±11.5 pp0.1%±0.1 pp124 ±177
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 9.8% ±14.4 pp0.1%±0.1 pp151 ±222
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 0.4% ±11.3 pp0.0%±0.1 pp6 ±174
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 47.7% ±21.2 pp0.4%±0.2 pp734 ±326
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 0.8%±0.2 pp0.8%±0.2 pp1,537±323 2.2%±0.1 pp2.2%±0.1 pp67,714±2,153 ▼ -1.3%▼ -1.3% 15/15
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 34.1%±15.5 pp0.3%±0.1 pp524±238 25.0%±1.1 pp0.5%±0.0 pp16,948±757 ▲ +9.0%▼ -0.3% 2/1515/15
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 8.0%±11.5 pp0.1%±0.1 pp124±177 12.9%±1.0 pp0.3%±0.0 pp8,738±667 ▼ -4.9%▼ -0.2% 15/1515/15
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 9.8%±14.4 pp0.1%±0.1 pp151±222 29.1%±1.1 pp0.6%±0.0 pp19,723±754 ▼ -19.3%▼ -0.6% 15/1515/15
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 0.4%±11.3 pp0.0%±0.1 pp6±174 5.9%±0.8 pp0.1%±0.0 pp4,026±537 ▼ -5.6%▼ -0.1% 15/1515/15
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 47.7%±21.2 pp0.4%±0.2 pp734±326 27.0%±1.8 pp0.6%±0.0 pp18,279±1,202 ▲ +20.7%▼ -0.2% 1/1512/15
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show
Category District 9
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 58.0% ±0.8 pp58.0%±0.8 pp145,739 ±2,044
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 42.0% ±1.0 pp42.0%±1.0 pp105,678 ±2,483
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 11.0% ±0.6 pp26.1%±1.2 pp27,540 ±1,452
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 31.1% ±1.0 pp73.9%±1.6 pp78,138 ±2,461
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 58.0%±0.8 pp58.0%±0.8 pp145,739±2,044 64.3%±0.3 pp64.3%±0.3 pp2,479,853±10,798 ▼ -6.3%▼ -6.3% 13/15
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 42.0%±1.0 pp42.0%±1.0 pp105,678±2,483 35.7%±0.3 pp35.7%±0.3 pp1,377,410±11,170 ▲ +6.3%▲ +6.3% 3/15
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 11.0%±0.6 pp26.1%±1.2 pp27,540±1,452 18.0%±0.2 pp50.4%±0.3 pp693,647±6,987 ▼ -7.0%▼ -24.3% 15/1515/15
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 31.1%±1.0 pp73.9%±1.6 pp78,138±2,461 17.7%±0.2 pp49.6%±0.5 pp683,763±8,715 ▲ +13.4%▲ +24.3% 1/151/15
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show
Category District 9
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 22.2%±0.9 pp52.8%±1.1 pp55,782±2,150
Born in El Salvador (of foreign-born residents) 7.6%±0.6 pp18.0%±1.4 pp18,968±1,573
Born in Guatemala (of foreign-born residents) 6.6%±0.7 pp15.7%±1.5 pp16,550±1,634
Born in Honduras (of foreign-born residents) 1.5%±0.3 pp3.5%±0.6 pp3,677±671
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 4.2%9.9%10,449
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 Los Angeles Difference Rank
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 22.2% ±0.9 pp52.8%±1.1 pp55,782 11.0% ±0.2 pp30.8%424,738 ▲ +11.2%▲ +22.0% 1/152/15
Born in El Salvador (of foreign-born residents) 7.6% ±0.6 pp18.0%±1.4 pp18,968 4.1% ±0.1 pp11.6%160,004 ▲ +3.4%▲ +6.4% 3/153/15
Born in Guatemala (of foreign-born residents) 6.6% ±0.7 pp15.7%±1.5 pp16,550 3.1% ±0.1 pp8.7%119,892 ▲ +3.5%▲ +7.0% 2/152/15
Born in Honduras (of foreign-born residents) 1.5% ±0.3 pp3.5%±0.6 pp3,677 0.5% ±0.0 pp1.4%19,851 ▲ +0.9%▲ +2.0% 1/151/15
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 4.2%9.9%10,449 ——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show
Category District 9
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 9.3% ±0.7 pp22.1%±1.6 pp23,370 ±1,768
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 9.5% ±0.6 pp22.6%±1.2 pp23,825 ±1,386
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 10.1% ±0.5 pp24.1%±1.1 pp25,465 ±1,310
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 13.1% ±0.5 pp31.2%±1.1 pp32,892 ±1,368
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 9.3%±0.7 pp22.1%±1.6 pp23,370±1,768 8.0%±0.2 pp291.4%±9.2 pp307,579±6,156 ▲ +1.3%▼ -269.3% 5/159/15
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 9.5%±0.6 pp22.6%±1.2 pp23,825±1,386 7.2%±0.1 pp264.3%±8.0 pp278,968±4,987 ▲ +2.3%▼ -241.7% 3/152/15
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 10.1%±0.5 pp24.1%±1.1 pp25,465±1,310 7.6%±0.1 pp278.1%±8.2 pp293,558±4,815 ▲ +2.5%▼ -254.0% 1/152/15
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 13.1%±0.5 pp31.2%±1.1 pp32,892±1,368 12.9%±0.1 pp471.1%±12.7 pp497,305±5,768 ▲ +0.2%▼ -440.0% 7/1514/15
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later 1.7% ±0.2 pp4,158 ±506 5.0% ±0.4 pp13,303 ±1,002 9.3% ±0.7 pp23,370 ±1,768 ▲ +7.6 pp▲ +19,212▲ +4.3 pp▲ +10,067▲ +3.3 pp▲ +9,145
Los Angeles citywide 1.7% ±0.1 pp64,948 ±2,271 5.1% ±0.1 pp202,940 ±3,998 8.0% ±0.2 pp307,579 ±6,179 ▲ +6.3 pp▲ +242,631▲ +2.9 pp▲ +104,639▲ +3.4 pp▲ +137,992
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 12.8% ±0.6 pp31,545 ±1,594 11.4% ±0.5 pp30,350 ±1,437 9.5% ±0.6 pp23,825 ±1,386 ▼ −3.3 pp▼ −7,720▼ −1.9 pp▼ −6,525▼ −1.3 pp▼ −1,195
Los Angeles citywide 10.0% ±0.2 pp386,575 ±5,794 8.5% ±0.1 pp335,409 ±4,817 7.2% ±0.1 pp278,968 ±5,010 ▼ −2.8 pp▼ −107,607▼ −1.2 pp▼ −56,441▼ −1.6 pp▼ −51,166
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 12.4% ±0.5 pp30,592 ±1,223 11.3% ±0.4 pp30,019 ±1,179 10.1% ±0.5 pp25,465 ±1,310 ▼ −2.2 pp▼ −5,127▼ −1.2 pp▼ −4,554▼ −1.1 pp▼ −573
Los Angeles citywide 9.9% ±0.1 pp381,773 ±4,974 8.5% ±0.1 pp338,094 ±4,761 7.6% ±0.1 pp293,558 ±4,841 ▼ −2.3 pp▼ −88,215▼ −0.9 pp▼ −44,536▼ −1.4 pp▼ −43,679
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 17.1% ±0.5 pp42,224 ±1,294 14.2% ±0.4 pp37,752 ±1,057 13.1% ±0.5 pp32,892 ±1,368 ▼ −4.0 pp▼ −9,332▼ −1.1 pp▼ −4,860▼ −2.9 pp▼ −4,472
Los Angeles citywide 17.0% ±0.2 pp655,695 ±5,798 14.8% ±0.1 pp585,903 ±4,838 12.9% ±0.2 pp497,305 ±5,831 ▼ −4.1 pp▼ −158,390▼ −1.9 pp▼ −88,598▼ −2.2 pp▼ −69,792
Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category District 9
Average Household Income $71,850±$1,988
Per Capita Income $18,926±$454
10th Percentile Household Income $11,024±$677
25th Percentile Household Income $26,762±$1,258
Median Household Income $55,375±$1,820
75th Percentile Household Income $96,003±$2,119
90th Percentile Household Income $153,189±$5,854
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $71,850±$1,988 $125,130±$1,000 ▼ −$53,280 15/15
Per Capita Income $18,926±$454 $47,685±$375 ▼ −$28,759 15/15
10th Percentile Household Income $11,024±$677 $14,186±$216 ▼ −$3,161 13/15
25th Percentile Household Income $26,762±$1,258 $37,123±$496 ▼ −$10,361 13/15
Median Household Income $55,375±$1,820 $81,939±$742 ▼ −$26,564 15/15
75th Percentile Household Income $96,003±$2,119 $154,703±$1,370 ▼ −$58,701 15/15
90th Percentile Household Income $153,189±$5,854 Over $200,000 ▼ −$46,811+ 15/15
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $49,044 ±882 $63,652 ±1,989 $71,850 ±1,988 ▲ +$22,806▲ +$8,198▲ +$14,608
Los Angeles citywide $103,745 ±722 $118,302 ±915 $125,130 ±1,000 ▲ +$21,385▲ +$6,828▲ +$14,557
Average Household Income (nominal dollars) $37,013 ±666 $51,877 ±1,621 $71,850 ±1,988 ▲ +$34,837▲ +$19,974▲ +$14,864
Los Angeles citywide $78,294 ±545 $96,416 ±746 $125,130 ±1,000 ▲ +$46,835▲ +$28,714▲ +$18,122
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $12,915 ±191 $16,951 ±562 $18,926 ±454 ▲ +$6,012▲ +$1,976▲ +$4,036
Los Angeles citywide $37,526 ±267 $43,265 ±333 $47,685 ±375 ▲ +$10,159▲ +$4,420▲ +$5,739
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars) $9,747 ±144 $13,815 ±458 $18,926 ±454 ▲ +$9,180▲ +$5,112▲ +$4,068
Los Angeles citywide $28,320 ±202 $35,261 ±271 $47,685 ±375 ▲ +$19,365▲ +$12,424▲ +$6,941
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $9,718 ±528 $12,337 ±599 $11,024 ±677 ▲ +$1,307▼ −$1,313▲ +$2,620
Los Angeles citywide $15,033 ±149 $15,850 ±169 $14,186 ±216 ▼ −$847▼ −$1,664▲ +$817
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $7,334 ±398 $10,055 ±488 $11,024 ±677 ▲ +$3,690▲ +$969▲ +$2,721
Los Angeles citywide $11,345 ±113 $12,918 ±138 $14,186 ±216 ▲ +$2,841▲ +$1,268▲ +$1,573
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $19,857 ±537 $23,593 ±729 $26,762 ±1,258 ▲ +$6,906▲ +$3,169▲ +$3,737
Los Angeles citywide $30,727 ±279 $35,350 ±357 $37,123 ±496 ▲ +$6,396▲ +$1,773▲ +$4,623
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $14,985 ±405 $19,228 ±595 $26,762 ±1,258 ▲ +$11,777▲ +$7,534▲ +$4,243
Los Angeles citywide $23,189 ±211 $28,810 ±291 $37,123 ±496 ▲ +$13,934▲ +$8,313▲ +$5,621
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $37,787 ±927 $46,543 ±1,175 $55,375 ±1,820 ▲ +$17,588▲ +$8,832▲ +$8,756
Los Angeles citywide $65,832 ±458 $76,248 ±555 $81,939 ±742 ▲ +$16,107▲ +$5,691▲ +$10,416
Median Household Income (nominal dollars) $28,517 ±699 $37,933 ±957 $55,375 ±1,820 ▲ +$26,858▲ +$17,442▲ +$9,415
Los Angeles citywide $49,682 ±346 $62,142 ±452 $81,939 ±742 ▲ +$32,257▲ +$19,797▲ +$12,460
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $65,747 ±1,489 $83,903 ±2,009 $96,003 ±2,119 ▲ +$30,255▲ +$12,100▲ +$18,156
Los Angeles citywide $127,020 ±723 $145,116 ±805 $154,703 ±1,370 ▲ +$27,684▲ +$9,587▲ +$18,097
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $49,618 ±1,123 $68,381 ±1,637 $96,003 ±2,119 ▲ +$46,384▲ +$27,622▲ +$18,763
Los Angeles citywide $95,860 ±545 $118,270 ±656 $154,703 ±1,370 ▲ +$58,844▲ +$36,433▲ +$22,410
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $103,380 ±3,903 $133,363 ±3,808 $153,189 ±5,854 ▲ +$49,809▲ +$19,826▲ +$29,983
Los Angeles citywide $221,824 ±1,731 $245,212 ±895 — ——▲ +$23,388
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $78,019 ±2,945 $108,691 ±3,103 $153,189 ±5,854 ▲ +$75,170▲ +$44,498▲ +$30,672
Los Angeles citywide $167,407 ±1,307 $199,848 ±730 — ——▲ +$32,441

Poverty Status

Category District 9
Below Poverty Line 25.7% ±1.3 pp64,626 ±3,177
Below 200% Poverty Line 55.9% ±1.9 pp140,462 ±4,697
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 12.4% ±0.9 pp31,087 ±2,234
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Below Poverty Line 25.7%±1.3 pp64,626±3,177 16.5%±0.3 pp638,207±11,569 ▲ +9.2% 1/15
Below 200% Poverty Line 55.9%±1.9 pp140,462±4,697 34.8%±0.4 pp1,343,960±17,101 ▲ +21.0% 1/15
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 12.4%±0.9 pp31,087±2,234 8.0%±0.2 pp308,978±7,316 ▲ +4.4% 1/15
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Category District 9
Food Insecurity 46.1%89,225
Housing Insecurity 35.7%69,141
Transportation Barriers 22.3%43,246
Threatened Utility Shutoff 17.6%34,013
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Food Insecurity 46.1%89,225 23.6%700,942 ▲ +22.5% 1/15
Housing Insecurity 35.7%69,141 19.3%573,228 ▲ +16.4% 1/15
Transportation Barriers 22.3%43,246 11.8%350,471 ▲ +10.5% 1/15
Threatened Utility Shutoff 17.6%34,013 9.0%267,308 ▲ +8.6% 1/15
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category District 9
In Labor Force 77.1% ±1.0 pp79,260 ±1,058
↳ Employed 71.7% ±1.1 pp73,686 ±1,131
↳ Unemployed 5.3% ±0.6 pp5,439 ±608
↳ Unemployment Rate 6.9% ±0.8 pp—
Not in Labor Force 22.9% ±3.1 pp23,524 ±3,229
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
In Labor Force 77.1%±1.0 pp79,260±1,058 83.1%±0.2 pp1,458,393±3,957 ▼ -6.0% 14/15
↳ Employed 71.7%±1.1 pp73,686±1,131 76.8%±0.2 pp1,346,606±4,271 ▼ -5.1% 14/15
↳ Unemployed 5.3%±0.6 pp5,439±608 6.3%±0.2 pp110,332±3,060 ▼ -1.0% 12/15
↳ Unemployment Rate 6.9%±0.8 pp— 7.6%±0.2 pp132,846±3,656 ▼ -0.7% 11/15
Not in Labor Force 22.9%±3.1 pp23,524±3,229 16.9%±0.8 pp295,844±14,155 ▲ +6.0% 2/15
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category District 9
Management, Business, Science & Arts 17.5% ±1.1 pp19,135 ±1,174
↳ Management Occupations 4.6% ±0.5 pp4,994 ±543
↳ Business & Financial Operations 2.1% ±0.4 pp2,342 ±417
↳ Computer & Mathematical 0.9% ±0.3 pp990 ±281
↳ Architecture & Engineering 0.3% ±0.2 pp374 ±207
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 0.4% ±0.2 pp393 ±212
↳ Community & Social Service 1.4% ±0.3 pp1,511 ±306
↳ Legal Occupations 0.4% ±0.2 pp385 ±213
↳ Education, Training & Library 4.2% ±0.5 pp4,572 ±560
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 1.5% ±0.5 pp1,652 ±498
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 0.6% ±0.2 pp686 ±232
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 1.1% ±0.3 pp1,237 ±297
Service 25.7% ±1.2 pp27,979 ±1,284
↳ Healthcare Support 4.6% ±0.5 pp4,983 ±511
↳ Protective Service 2.3% ±0.4 pp2,478 ±418
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 8.0% ±0.7 pp8,676 ±712
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 8.1% ±0.7 pp8,782 ±732
↳ Personal Care & Service 2.8% ±0.4 pp3,060 ±430
Sales & Office 19.7% ±1.1 pp21,450 ±1,175
↳ Sales & Related 9.5% ±0.7 pp10,344 ±773
↳ Office & Administrative Support 10.2% ±0.8 pp11,106 ±914
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 13.3% ±1.0 pp14,530 ±1,075
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.8% ±0.3 pp911 ±347
↳ Construction & Extraction 9.4% ±0.9 pp10,305 ±930
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 3.0% ±0.4 pp3,314 ±466
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 23.8% ±1.1 pp25,956 ±1,251
↳ Production Occupations 10.3% ±0.7 pp11,256 ±806
↳ Transportation Occupations 5.8% ±0.6 pp6,289 ±615
↳ Material Moving Occupations 7.7% ±0.7 pp8,411 ±710
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts 17.5%±1.1 pp19,135±1,174 43.8%±0.3 pp856,718±5,665 ▼ -26.3% 15/15
↳ Management Occupations 4.6%±0.5 pp4,994±543 11.0%±0.2 pp215,767±3,237 ▼ -6.5% 15/15
↳ Business & Financial Operations 2.1%±0.4 pp2,342±417 6.1%±0.1 pp119,779±2,742 ▼ -4.0% 15/15
↳ Computer & Mathematical 0.9%±0.3 pp990±281 2.8%±0.1 pp55,551±1,839 ▼ -1.9% 15/15
↳ Architecture & Engineering 0.3%±0.2 pp374±207 1.6%±0.1 pp31,959±1,411 ▼ -1.3% 15/15
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 0.4%±0.2 pp393±212 1.1%±0.1 pp21,801±1,140 ▼ -0.8% 15/15
↳ Community & Social Service 1.4%±0.3 pp1,511±306 1.8%±0.1 pp34,335±1,497 ▼ -0.4% 14/15
↳ Legal Occupations 0.4%±0.2 pp385±213 2.1%±0.1 pp40,323±1,500 ▼ -1.7% 15/15
↳ Education, Training & Library 4.2%±0.5 pp4,572±560 5.1%±0.1 pp100,542±2,462 ▼ -1.0% 13/15
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 1.5%±0.5 pp1,652±498 7.4%±0.2 pp144,867±2,938 ▼ -5.9% 15/15
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 0.6%±0.2 pp686±232 3.3%±0.1 pp64,007±2,042 ▼ -2.6% 15/15
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 1.1%±0.3 pp1,237±297 1.4%±0.1 pp27,787±1,316 ▼ -0.3% 12/15
Service 25.7%±1.2 pp27,979±1,284 19.1%±0.2 pp372,654±4,348 ▲ +6.6% 2/15
↳ Healthcare Support 4.6%±0.5 pp4,983±511 4.1%±0.1 pp80,369±2,120 ▲ +0.5% 6/15
↳ Protective Service 2.3%±0.4 pp2,478±418 1.4%±0.1 pp28,096±1,344 ▲ +0.8% 3/15
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 8.0%±0.7 pp8,676±712 6.0%±0.1 pp117,268±2,832 ▲ +2.0% 3/15
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 8.1%±0.7 pp8,782±732 4.6%±0.1 pp89,319±2,441 ▲ +3.5% 1/15
↳ Personal Care & Service 2.8%±0.4 pp3,060±430 2.9%±0.1 pp57,602±2,122 ▼ -0.1% 10/15
Sales & Office 19.7%±1.1 pp21,450±1,175 18.5%±0.2 pp362,312±4,169 ▲ +1.1% 5/15
↳ Sales & Related 9.5%±0.7 pp10,344±773 8.7%±0.2 pp170,605±3,233 ▲ +0.8% 2/15
↳ Office & Administrative Support 10.2%±0.8 pp11,106±914 9.8%±0.2 pp191,707±3,358 ▲ +0.4% 7/15
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 13.3%±1.0 pp14,530±1,075 7.5%±0.1 pp146,574±2,638 ▲ +5.8% 2/15
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.8%±0.3 pp911±347 0.3%±0.0 pp5,780±677 ▲ +0.5% 1/15
↳ Construction & Extraction 9.4%±0.9 pp10,305±930 5.2%±0.1 pp101,165±2,372 ▲ +4.3% 2/15
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 3.0%±0.4 pp3,314±466 2.0%±0.1 pp39,629±1,434 ▲ +1.0% 4/15
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 23.8%±1.1 pp25,956±1,251 11.0%±0.2 pp215,668±3,737 ▲ +12.8% 1/15
↳ Production Occupations 10.3%±0.7 pp11,256±806 4.4%±0.1 pp85,463±2,595 ▲ +5.9% 1/15
↳ Transportation Occupations 5.8%±0.6 pp6,289±615 3.3%±0.1 pp64,837±2,015 ▲ +2.4% 2/15
↳ Material Moving Occupations 7.7%±0.7 pp8,411±710 3.3%±0.1 pp65,368±2,325 ▲ +4.4% 2/15
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category District 9
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.5% ±0.3 pp535 ±317
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.5% ±0.3 pp506 ±315
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0% ±0.2 pp29 ±177
Construction 9.7% ±0.8 pp10,629 ±887
Manufacturing 11.0% ±0.7 pp11,960 ±789
Wholesale Trade 5.0% ±0.5 pp5,406 ±582
Retail Trade 11.4% ±0.7 pp12,407 ±796
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 8.5% ±0.6 pp9,220 ±705
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 8.1% ±0.6 pp8,866 ±696
↳ Utilities 0.3% ±0.2 pp354 ±213
Information 1.1% ±0.2 pp1,154 ±270
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 2.6% ±0.4 pp2,874 ±449
↳ Finance & Insurance 1.5% ±0.3 pp1,676 ±359
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.1% ±0.3 pp1,199 ±317
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 11.2% ±0.8 pp12,179 ±858
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 2.9% ±0.4 pp3,120 ±443
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0% ±0.2 pp12 ±174
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 8.3% ±0.7 pp9,047 ±765
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 17.2% ±0.8 pp18,730 ±919
↳ Educational Services 7.9% ±0.6 pp8,578 ±708
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 9.3% ±0.6 pp10,152 ±682
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 12.8% ±0.8 pp13,923 ±855
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 1.5% ±0.3 pp1,582 ±368
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 11.3% ±0.7 pp12,341 ±813
Other Services 6.8% ±0.6 pp7,427 ±618
Public Administration 2.4% ±0.4 pp2,607 ±417
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.5%±0.3 pp535±317 0.4%±0.0 pp— ▲ +0.1% 5/15
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.5%±0.3 pp506±315 0.4%±0.0 pp— ▲ +0.1% 6/15
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%±0.2 pp29±177 0.0%±0.0 pp— 0% 8/15
Construction 9.7%±0.8 pp10,629±887 6.5%±0.1 pp— ▲ +3.3% 3/15
Manufacturing 11.0%±0.7 pp11,960±789 6.8%±0.2 pp— ▲ +4.1% 1/15
Wholesale Trade 5.0%±0.5 pp5,406±582 2.3%±0.1 pp— ▲ +2.6% 1/15
Retail Trade 11.4%±0.7 pp12,407±796 9.3%±0.2 pp— ▲ +2.1% 1/15
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 8.5%±0.6 pp9,220±705 5.3%±0.1 pp— ▲ +3.1% 3/15
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 8.1%±0.6 pp8,866±696 4.9%±0.1 pp— ▲ +3.2% 3/15
↳ Utilities 0.3%±0.2 pp354±213 0.4%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.1% 10/15
Information 1.1%±0.2 pp1,154±270 6.4%±0.2 pp— ▼ -5.4% 15/15
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 2.6%±0.4 pp2,874±449 5.8%±0.1 pp— ▼ -3.2% 15/15
↳ Finance & Insurance 1.5%±0.3 pp1,676±359 3.5%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.9% 15/15
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.1%±0.3 pp1,199±317 2.3%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.2% 15/15
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 11.2%±0.8 pp12,179±858 15.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -4.5% 15/15
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 2.9%±0.4 pp3,120±443 10.3%±0.2 pp— ▼ -7.5% 15/15
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%±0.2 pp12±174 0.1%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.1% 14/15
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 8.3%±0.7 pp9,047±765 5.2%±0.1 pp— ▲ +3.1% 1/15
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 17.2%±0.8 pp18,730±919 20.8%±0.2 pp— ▼ -3.6% 15/15
↳ Educational Services 7.9%±0.6 pp8,578±708 8.1%±0.2 pp— ▼ -0.3% 6/15
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 9.3%±0.6 pp10,152±682 12.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -3.3% 15/15
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 12.8%±0.8 pp13,923±855 12.0%±0.2 pp— ▲ +0.8% 5/15
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 1.5%±0.3 pp1,582±368 4.1%±0.1 pp— ▼ -2.7% 15/15
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 11.3%±0.7 pp12,341±813 7.9%±0.2 pp— ▲ +3.5% 3/15
Other Services 6.8%±0.6 pp7,427±618 6.0%±0.1 pp— ▲ +0.8% 5/15
Public Administration 2.4%±0.4 pp2,607±417 2.7%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.3% 9/15
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category District 9
Private Company Employee 69.6% ±0.8 pp75,909 ±882
Self-Employed 13.7% ±0.8 pp14,994 ±852
Nonprofit 7.3% ±0.6 pp7,933 ±706
Government 9.0% ±0.7 pp9,805 ±731
Unpaid Family Worker 0.4% ±0.2 pp410 ±225
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Private Company Employee 69.6%±0.8 pp75,909±882 66.9%±0.3 pp1,307,510±5,830 ▲ +2.7% 1/15
Self-Employed 13.7%±0.8 pp14,994±852 16.2%±0.2 pp316,694±4,405 ▼ -2.5% 13/15
Nonprofit 7.3%±0.6 pp7,933±706 8.0%±0.2 pp155,457±3,565 ▼ -0.7% 12/15
Government 9.0%±0.7 pp9,805±731 10.6%±0.2 pp207,304±3,359 ▼ -1.6% 13/15
Unpaid Family Worker 0.4%±0.2 pp410±225 0.3%±0.0 pp5,059±497 ▲ +0.1% 2/15
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category District 9
Full-Time, Year-Round 54.0% ±1.2 pp65,513 ±1,476
Part-Time or Part-Year 46.0% ±1.1 pp55,728 ±1,336
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round 54.0%±1.2 pp65,513±1,476 61.7%±0.2 pp1,328,967±3,929 ▼ -7.6% 15/15
Part-Time or Part-Year 46.0%±1.1 pp55,728±1,336 38.3%±0.3 pp826,047±5,840 ▲ +7.6% 1/15
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category District 9
Average FT Earnings $45,881±$886
10th Percentile FT Earnings $19,428±$1,142
25th Percentile FT Earnings $29,316±$765
Median FT Earnings $38,479±$556
75th Percentile FT Earnings $52,759±$1,118
90th Percentile FT Earnings $78,552±$3,184
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Average FT Earnings $45,881±$886 $93,330±$761 ▼ −$47,449 15/15
10th Percentile FT Earnings $19,428±$1,142 $25,056±$255 ▼ −$5,627 15/15
25th Percentile FT Earnings $29,316±$765 $37,825±$214 ▼ −$8,509 15/15
Median FT Earnings $38,479±$556 $61,975±$422 ▼ −$23,497 15/15
75th Percentile FT Earnings $52,759±$1,118 Over $100,000 ▼ −$47,241+ 15/15
90th Percentile FT Earnings $78,552±$3,184 Over $100,000 ▼ −$21,448+ 15/15
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $34,239 ±482 $42,612 ±1,365 $45,881 ±886 ▲ +$11,642▲ +$3,269▲ +$8,373
Los Angeles citywide $78,876 ±537 $84,242 ±564 $93,330 ±761 ▲ +$14,455▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,367
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $25,840 ±364 $34,729 ±1,112 $45,881 ±886 ▲ +$20,042▲ +$11,152▲ +$8,889
Los Angeles citywide $59,526 ±405 $68,658 ±460 $93,330 ±761 ▲ +$33,804▲ +$24,673▲ +$9,131
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $16,032 ±437 $18,494 ±407 $19,428 ±1,142 ▲ +$3,397▲ +$934▲ +$2,463
Los Angeles citywide $20,202 ±88 $21,993 ±185 $25,056 ±255 ▲ +$4,854▲ +$3,063▲ +$1,791
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $12,099 ±330 $15,073 ±331 $19,428 ±1,142 ▲ +$7,329▲ +$4,355▲ +$2,974
Los Angeles citywide $15,246 ±66 $17,924 ±151 $25,056 ±255 ▲ +$9,810▲ +$7,132▲ +$2,678
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $20,618 ±189 $24,617 ±334 $29,316 ±765 ▲ +$8,698▲ +$4,699▲ +$3,999
Los Angeles citywide $29,363 ±173 $32,975 ±184 $37,825 ±214 ▲ +$8,461▲ +$4,850▲ +$3,611
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $15,560 ±142 $20,063 ±272 $29,316 ±765 ▲ +$13,756▲ +$9,253▲ +$4,503
Los Angeles citywide $22,160 ±131 $26,874 ±150 $37,825 ±214 ▲ +$15,665▲ +$10,950▲ +$4,714
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $27,417 ±500 $33,395 ±502 $38,479 ±556 ▲ +$11,062▲ +$5,083▲ +$5,979
Los Angeles citywide $51,909 ±336 $54,226 ±279 $61,975 ±422 ▲ +$10,067▲ +$7,750▲ +$2,317
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $20,691 ±377 $27,217 ±409 $38,479 ±556 ▲ +$17,788▲ +$11,261▲ +$6,526
Los Angeles citywide $39,175 ±254 $44,194 ±227 $61,975 ±422 ▲ +$22,801▲ +$17,781▲ +$5,019
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $42,145 ±814 $48,273 ±812 $52,759 ±1,118 ▲ +$10,614▲ +$4,487▲ +$6,128
Los Angeles citywide $91,403 ±620 $98,002 ±683 — ——▲ +$6,599
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $31,806 ±614 $39,342 ±662 $52,759 ±1,118 ▲ +$20,953▲ +$13,417▲ +$7,536
Los Angeles citywide $68,981 ±468 $79,872 ±557 — ——▲ +$10,891
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $61,093 ±1,880 $69,658 ±2,114 $78,552 ±3,184 ▲ +$17,459▲ +$8,894▲ +$8,565
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $46,106 ±1,419 $56,771 ±1,723 $78,552 ±3,184 ▲ +$32,446▲ +$21,781▲ +$10,665
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category District 9
Average PT Earnings $20,198±$609
10th Percentile PT Earnings $2,553±$249
25th Percentile PT Earnings $6,844±$396
Median PT Earnings $16,470±$688
75th Percentile PT Earnings $27,440±$815
90th Percentile PT Earnings $39,488±$1,705
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Average PT Earnings $20,198±$609 $36,543±$574 ▼ −$16,344 15/15
10th Percentile PT Earnings $2,553±$249 $2,785±$92 ▼ −$232 12/15
25th Percentile PT Earnings $6,844±$396 $8,451±$190 ▼ −$1,607 14/15
Median PT Earnings $16,470±$688 $20,275±$216 ▼ −$3,805 15/15
75th Percentile PT Earnings $27,440±$815 $39,236±$450 ▼ −$11,795 15/15
90th Percentile PT Earnings $39,488±$1,705 $80,378±$1,643 ▼ −$40,890 15/15
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $15,028 ±436 $17,100 ±910 $20,198 ±609 ▲ +$5,170▲ +$3,099▲ +$2,072
Los Angeles citywide $30,652 ±490 $34,166 ±509 $36,543 ±574 ▲ +$5,890▲ +$2,377▲ +$3,513
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $11,341 ±329 $13,936 ±742 $20,198 ±609 ▲ +$8,857▲ +$6,262▲ +$2,595
Los Angeles citywide $23,133 ±369 $27,845 ±415 $36,543 ±574 ▲ +$13,410▲ +$8,698▲ +$4,712
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,759 ±107 $1,918 ±117 $2,553 ±249 ▲ +$794▲ +$635▲ +$159
Los Angeles citywide $2,482 ±54 $2,712 ±58 $2,785 ±92 ▲ +$303▲ +$73▲ +$230
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $1,328 ±81 $1,563 ±95 $2,553 ±249 ▲ +$1,226▲ +$990▲ +$236
Los Angeles citywide $1,873 ±41 $2,210 ±47 $2,785 ±92 ▲ +$912▲ +$575▲ +$337
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $4,823 ±292 $5,481 ±316 $6,844 ±396 ▲ +$2,021▲ +$1,363▲ +$658
Los Angeles citywide $7,239 ±105 $8,054 ±111 $8,451 ±190 ▲ +$1,212▲ +$397▲ +$815
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $3,640 ±221 $4,467 ±258 $6,844 ±396 ▲ +$3,204▲ +$2,377▲ +$827
Los Angeles citywide $5,463 ±79 $6,564 ±91 $8,451 ±190 ▲ +$2,988▲ +$1,887▲ +$1,101
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $11,239 ±435 $12,983 ±372 $16,470 ±688 ▲ +$5,231▲ +$3,487▲ +$1,744
Los Angeles citywide $16,086 ±129 $18,060 ±185 $20,275 ±216 ▲ +$4,189▲ +$2,215▲ +$1,973
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $8,482 ±329 $10,581 ±303 $16,470 ±688 ▲ +$7,988▲ +$5,889▲ +$2,099
Los Angeles citywide $12,140 ±97 $14,719 ±151 $20,275 ±216 ▲ +$8,135▲ +$5,556▲ +$2,579
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $20,139 ±654 $21,894 ±683 $27,440 ±815 ▲ +$7,302▲ +$5,546▲ +$1,755
Los Angeles citywide $33,887 ±443 $36,465 ±382 $39,236 ±450 ▲ +$5,349▲ +$2,771▲ +$2,578
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $15,198 ±493 $17,844 ±557 $27,440 ±815 ▲ +$12,242▲ +$9,597▲ +$2,645
Los Angeles citywide $25,574 ±335 $29,719 ±311 $39,236 ±450 ▲ +$13,662▲ +$9,517▲ +$4,145
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $31,983 ±2,017 $34,028 ±1,353 $39,488 ±1,705 ▲ +$7,505▲ +$5,461▲ +$2,045
Los Angeles citywide $68,714 ±742 $73,646 ±1,127 $80,378 ±1,643 ▲ +$11,664▲ +$6,732▲ +$4,932
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $24,137 ±1,522 $27,733 ±1,102 $39,488 ±1,705 ▲ +$15,351▲ +$11,756▲ +$3,595
Los Angeles citywide $51,857 ±560 $60,021 ±919 $80,378 ±1,643 ▲ +$28,521▲ +$20,356▲ +$8,164

Earnings of All Workers

Category District 9
Average Earnings $34,001±$467
10th Percentile Earnings $5,648±$359
25th Percentile Earnings $15,183±$590
Median Earnings $29,554±$615
75th Percentile Earnings $43,193±$745
90th Percentile Earnings $64,907±$1,782
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Average Earnings $34,001±$467 $71,563±$569 ▼ −$37,562 15/15
10th Percentile Earnings $5,648±$359 $7,934±$179 ▼ −$2,285 14/15
25th Percentile Earnings $15,183±$590 $21,876±$191 ▼ −$6,694 15/15
Median Earnings $29,554±$615 $43,575±$259 ▼ −$14,021 15/15
75th Percentile Earnings $43,193±$745 $85,854±$580 ▼ −$42,661 15/15
90th Percentile Earnings $64,907±$1,782 Over $100,000 ▼ −$35,093+ 15/15
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $26,258 ±343 $32,443 ±904 $34,001 ±467 ▲ +$7,742▲ +$1,558▲ +$6,185
Los Angeles citywide $59,351 ±430 $65,850 ±455 $71,563 ±569 ▲ +$12,212▲ +$5,713▲ +$6,499
Average Earnings (nominal dollars) $19,817 ±259 $26,441 ±737 $34,001 ±467 ▲ +$14,184▲ +$7,559▲ +$6,624
Los Angeles citywide $44,791 ±324 $53,668 ±371 $71,563 ±569 ▲ +$26,772▲ +$17,895▲ +$8,877
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $4,408 ±296 $5,354 ±318 $5,648 ±359 ▲ +$1,240▲ +$294▲ +$946
Los Angeles citywide $6,842 ±104 $8,269 ±107 $7,934 ±179 ▲ +$1,091▼ −$335▲ +$1,427
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $3,327 ±223 $4,364 ±259 $5,648 ±359 ▲ +$2,322▲ +$1,285▲ +$1,037
Los Angeles citywide $5,164 ±78 $6,739 ±87 $7,934 ±179 ▲ +$2,770▲ +$1,194▲ +$1,576
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $12,391 ±487 $14,400 ±355 $15,183 ±590 ▲ +$2,792▲ +$783▲ +$2,009
Los Angeles citywide $17,205 ±143 $20,088 ±119 $21,876 ±191 ▲ +$4,671▲ +$1,789▲ +$2,883
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $9,351 ±368 $11,736 ±290 $15,183 ±590 ▲ +$5,832▲ +$3,447▲ +$2,385
Los Angeles citywide $12,984 ±108 $16,372 ±97 $21,876 ±191 ▲ +$8,892▲ +$5,505▲ +$3,387
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $21,460 ±214 $25,621 ±289 $29,554 ±615 ▲ +$8,094▲ +$3,933▲ +$4,161
Los Angeles citywide $35,447 ±232 $39,719 ±188 $43,575 ±259 ▲ +$8,128▲ +$3,856▲ +$4,272
Median Earnings (nominal dollars) $16,195 ±162 $20,881 ±235 $29,554 ±615 ▲ +$13,359▲ +$8,673▲ +$4,686
Los Angeles citywide $26,751 ±175 $32,371 ±154 $43,575 ±259 ▲ +$16,824▲ +$11,204▲ +$5,620
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $34,204 ±715 $39,634 ±596 $43,193 ±745 ▲ +$8,989▲ +$3,558▲ +$5,430
Los Angeles citywide $70,301 ±313 $76,149 ±396 $85,854 ±580 ▲ +$15,552▲ +$9,705▲ +$5,848
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $25,813 ±540 $32,302 ±486 $43,193 ±745 ▲ +$17,379▲ +$10,891▲ +$6,489
Los Angeles citywide $53,055 ±236 $62,062 ±323 $85,854 ±580 ▲ +$32,798▲ +$23,792▲ +$9,006
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $52,837 ±1,207 $60,129 ±1,402 $64,907 ±1,782 ▲ +$12,070▲ +$4,778▲ +$7,292
Los Angeles citywide $127,692 ±642 — — ———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $39,875 ±911 $49,005 ±1,142 $64,907 ±1,782 ▲ +$25,032▲ +$15,902▲ +$9,130
Los Angeles citywide $96,367 ±484 — — ———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in District 9

Category District 9
Household income at age 35 $38,546 ±$303
Household income percentile rank 38.2 ±0.22 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 6.15% ±0.21 pp
Individual income at age 35 $30,852 ±$275
Fraction married 25.5% ±0.39 pp
Employment rate 70.2% ±0.41 pp
Incarceration rate 2.01% ±0.15 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 9. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 9 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category District 9 City Difference
Household income at age 35 $38,546 ±$303 $49,428 ±$104 −$10,883
Household income percentile rank 38.2 ±0.22 pp 45.3 ±0.06 pp −7.1 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 6.15% ±0.21 pp 15.3% ±0.08 pp −9.1 pp
Individual income at age 35 $30,852 ±$275 $37,122 ±$78 −$6,270
Fraction married 25.5% ±0.39 pp 32.5% ±0.11 pp −7.0 pp
Employment rate 70.2% ±0.41 pp 72.6% ±0.11 pp −2.4 pp
Incarceration rate 2.01% ±0.15 pp 1.30% ±0.03 pp +0.7 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 9. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 9 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in District 9 in Lower-Income Families

Category District 9
Household income at age 35 $38,093 ±$380
Household income percentile rank 37.9 ±0.27 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 5.88% ±0.27 pp
Individual income at age 35 $30,926 ±$331
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 9 with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 9 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category District 9 City Difference
Household income at age 35 $38,093 ±$380 $43,490 ±$127 −$5,396
Household income percentile rank 37.9 ±0.27 pp 41.6 ±0.09 pp −3.7 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 5.88% ±0.27 pp 10.5% ±0.10 pp −4.6 pp
Individual income at age 35 $30,926 ±$331 $33,938 ±$103 −$3,011
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 9 with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 9 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in District 9

Category District 9
Stayed in the greater Los Angeles area 84.2% ±0.33 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 29.3% ±0.42 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 9. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Los Angeles area” means the Census commuting zone for the Los Angeles area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 9 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category District 9 City Difference
Stayed in the greater Los Angeles area 84.2% ±0.33 pp 81.1% ±0.09 pp +3.1 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 29.3% ±0.42 pp 26.3% ±0.11 pp +3.1 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 9. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Los Angeles area” means the Census commuting zone for the Los Angeles area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 9 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in District 9

Category District 9
All jobs located in district 9 82,429
District 9 jobs held by District 9 residents 8.1%
District 9 jobs held by non-District 9 residents 91.9%
Employed residents working in District 9 7.6%
Employed residents working outside District 9 92.4%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category District 9 Los Angeles district median Difference Rank
All jobs located in district 9 82,429 95,694 ▼ −13,265 12/15
District 9 jobs held by District 9 residents 8.1% 11.2% ▼ −3.1 pp 13/15
District 9 jobs held by non-District 9 residents 91.9% 88.8% ▲ +3.1 pp 3/15
Employed residents working in District 9 7.6% 11.4% ▼ −3.8 pp 14/15
Employed residents working outside District 9 92.4% 88.6% ▲ +3.8 pp 2/15
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in district 9 58,220 58,611 82,429 ▲ +24,209▲ +23,818▲ +391
Los Angeles citywide 89,273 104,316 95,694 ▲ +6,421▼ −8,622▲ +15,043
District 9 jobs held by District 9 residents 9.3%4,616 10.6%5,263 8.1%5,824 ▼ −1.2 pp▲ +1,208▼ −2.5 pp▲ +561▲ +1.3 pp▲ +647
Los Angeles citywide 11.4%9,684 11.3%10,616 11.2%11,096 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +1,412▼ −0.1 pp▲ +480▼ −0.1 pp▲ +932
District 9 jobs held by non-District 9 residents 90.7%44,848 89.4%44,467 91.9%66,161 ▲ +1.2 pp▲ +21,313▲ +2.5 pp▲ +21,694▼ −1.3 pp▼ −381
Los Angeles citywide 88.6%74,819 88.7%78,864 88.8%78,617 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +3,798▲ +0.1 pp▼ −247▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,045
Employed residents working in District 9 7.4%4,616 7.1%5,263 7.6%5,824 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +1,208▲ +0.5 pp▲ +561▼ −0.2 pp▲ +647
Los Angeles citywide 10.4%9,684 10.5%10,616 11.4%11,096 ▲ +1.0 pp▲ +1,412▲ +0.9 pp▲ +480– 0.0 pp▲ +932
Employed residents working outside District 9 92.6%57,917 92.9%68,521 92.4%70,892 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +12,975▼ −0.5 pp▲ +2,371▲ +0.2 pp▲ +10,604
Los Angeles citywide 89.6%77,826 89.5%87,601 88.6%86,195 ▼ −1.0 pp▲ +8,369▼ −0.9 pp▼ −1,406– 0.0 pp▲ +9,775

Industry of Jobs in District 9

Category District 9
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.3%211
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0
Construction 0.8%688
Manufacturing 7.1%5,856
Wholesale Trade 4.4%3,664
Retail Trade 7.3%6,041
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 1.3%1,086
↳ Utilities 0.0%11
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 1.3%1,075
Information 0.7%551
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 1.2%1,010
↳ Finance & Insurance 0.8%627
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 0.5%383
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 8.6%7,056
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 3.4%2,794
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.3%219
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 4.9%4,043
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 49.8%41,087
↳ Educational Services 36.4%29,979
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 13.5%11,108
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 15.7%12,966
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 6.0%4,933
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 9.7%8,033
Other Services 2.3%1,933
Public Administration 0.3%280
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.3%211 0.1%1,863 ▲ +0.2% 2/15
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0 0.0%95 0% 11/15
Construction 0.8%688 2.7%53,670 ▼ -1.9% 15/15
Manufacturing 7.1%5,856 3.8%76,408 ▲ +3.3% 6/15
Wholesale Trade 4.4%3,664 3.2%64,041 ▲ +1.2% 6/15
Retail Trade 7.3%6,041 7.1%140,469 ▲ +0.3% 10/15
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 1.3%1,086 5.4%107,363 ▼ -4.1% 11/15
↳ Utilities 0.0%11 0.8%16,873 ▼ -0.8% 12/15
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 1.3%1,075 4.5%90,490 ▼ -3.2% 10/15
Information 0.7%551 8.3%164,777 ▼ -7.6% 12/15
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 1.2%1,010 5.9%116,890 ▼ -4.7% 15/15
↳ Finance & Insurance 0.8%627 3.6%70,731 ▼ -2.8% 15/15
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 0.5%383 2.3%46,159 ▼ -1.9% 15/15
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 8.6%7,056 15.1%300,205 ▼ -6.5% 15/15
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 3.4%2,794 8.1%160,571 ▼ -4.7% 12/15
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.3%219 1.1%22,328 ▼ -0.9% 13/15
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 4.9%4,043 5.9%117,306 ▼ -1.0% 8/15
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 49.8%41,087 28.4%564,032 ▲ +21.5% 2/15
↳ Educational Services 36.4%29,979 10.0%198,175 ▲ +26.4% 1/15
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 13.5%11,108 18.4%365,857 ▼ -4.9% 13/15
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 15.7%12,966 11.3%224,945 ▲ +4.4% 2/15
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 6.0%4,933 2.8%55,106 ▲ +3.2% 1/15
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 9.7%8,033 8.5%169,839 ▲ +1.2% 5/15
Other Services 2.3%1,933 3.7%73,569 ▼ -1.4% 13/15
Public Administration 0.3%280 5.1%100,972 ▼ -4.7% 7/15
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%16 0.0%0 0.3%211 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +195▲ +0.3 pp▲ +211– 0.0 pp▼ −16
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%3,692 0.1%1,252 0.1%1,863 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,829– 0.0 pp▲ +611▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2,440
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%3 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp▼ −3– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▼ −3
Los Angeles citywide 0.1%1,115 0.0%132 0.0%95 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,020– 0.0 pp▼ −37▼ −0.1 pp▼ −983
Construction 0.5%301 0.8%459 0.8%688 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +387▲ +0.1 pp▲ +229▲ +0.3 pp▲ +158
Los Angeles citywide 2.3%39,739 2.8%53,523 2.7%53,670 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +13,931▼ −0.1 pp▲ +147▲ +0.5 pp▲ +13,784
Manufacturing 15.4%8,963 11.7%6,850 7.1%5,856 ▼ −8.3 pp▼ −3,107▼ −4.6 pp▼ −994▼ −3.7 pp▼ −2,113
Los Angeles citywide 5.7%98,332 4.2%81,930 3.8%76,408 ▼ −1.8 pp▼ −21,924▼ −0.4 pp▼ −5,522▼ −1.4 pp▼ −16,402
Wholesale Trade 10.0%5,836 7.3%4,281 4.4%3,664 ▼ −5.6 pp▼ −2,172▼ −2.9 pp▼ −617▼ −2.7 pp▼ −1,555
Los Angeles citywide 4.6%79,491 3.6%68,851 3.2%64,041 ▼ −1.4 pp▼ −15,450▼ −0.3 pp▼ −4,810▼ −1.0 pp▼ −10,640
Retail Trade 10.0%5,820 9.4%5,502 7.3%6,041 ▼ −2.7 pp▲ +221▼ −2.1 pp▲ +539▼ −0.6 pp▼ −318
Los Angeles citywide 8.7%151,083 7.5%144,615 7.1%140,469 ▼ −1.7 pp▼ −10,614▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,146▼ −1.3 pp▼ −6,468
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 2.4%1,425 1.5%867 1.3%1,086 ▼ −1.1 pp▼ −339▼ −0.2 pp▲ +219▼ −1.0 pp▼ −558
Los Angeles citywide 4.8%82,154 5.8%111,722 5.4%107,363 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +25,209▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,359▲ +1.0 pp▲ +29,568
Utilities 0.0%24 0.0%6 0.0%11 – 0.0 pp▼ −13– 0.0 pp▲ +5– 0.0 pp▼ −18
Los Angeles citywide 0.9%16,017 1.0%18,483 0.8%16,873 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +856▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,610– 0.0 pp▲ +2,466
Transportation & Warehousing 2.4%1,401 1.5%861 1.3%1,075 ▼ −1.1 pp▼ −326▼ −0.2 pp▲ +214▼ −0.9 pp▼ −540
Los Angeles citywide 3.8%66,137 4.8%93,239 4.5%90,490 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +24,353▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,749▲ +1.0 pp▲ +27,102
Information 1.9%1,123 1.5%850 0.7%551 ▼ −1.3 pp▼ −572▼ −0.8 pp▼ −299▼ −0.5 pp▼ −273
Los Angeles citywide 6.3%109,667 7.4%142,344 8.3%164,777 ▲ +1.9 pp▲ +55,110▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,433▲ +1.0 pp▲ +32,677
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 2.2%1,263 2.5%1,448 1.2%1,010 ▼ −0.9 pp▼ −253▼ −1.2 pp▼ −438▲ +0.3 pp▲ +185
Los Angeles citywide 6.1%104,878 5.7%110,941 5.9%116,890 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +12,012▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5,949▼ −0.3 pp▲ +6,063
Finance & Insurance 1.6%912 1.8%1,084 0.8%627 ▼ −0.8 pp▼ −285▼ −1.1 pp▼ −457▲ +0.3 pp▲ +172
Los Angeles citywide 3.9%67,959 3.6%69,529 3.6%70,731 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,772– 0.0 pp▲ +1,202▼ −0.3 pp▲ +1,570
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 0.6%351 0.6%364 0.5%383 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +32▼ −0.2 pp▲ +19– 0.0 pp▲ +13
Los Angeles citywide 2.1%36,919 2.1%41,412 2.3%46,159 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +9,240▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,747– 0.0 pp▲ +4,493
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 9.4%5,500 10.6%6,216 8.6%7,056 ▼ −0.9 pp▲ +1,556▼ −2.0 pp▲ +840▲ +1.2 pp▲ +716
Los Angeles citywide 15.2%262,265 14.9%287,629 15.1%300,205 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +37,940▲ +0.2 pp▲ +12,576▼ −0.3 pp▲ +25,364
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 4.0%2,317 3.5%2,075 3.4%2,794 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +477▼ −0.2 pp▲ +719▼ −0.4 pp▼ −242
Los Angeles citywide 7.7%132,950 7.9%153,596 8.1%160,571 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +27,621▲ +0.1 pp▲ +6,975▲ +0.3 pp▲ +20,646
Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.7%384 0.6%326 0.3%219 ▼ −0.4 pp▼ −165▼ −0.3 pp▼ −107▼ −0.1 pp▼ −58
Los Angeles citywide 1.3%22,245 1.2%22,485 1.1%22,328 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +83– 0.0 pp▼ −157▼ −0.1 pp▲ +240
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 4.8%2,799 6.5%3,815 4.9%4,043 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,244▼ −1.6 pp▲ +228▲ +1.7 pp▲ +1,016
Los Angeles citywide 6.2%107,070 5.8%111,548 5.9%117,306 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +10,236▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5,758▼ −0.4 pp▲ +4,478
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 23.8%13,883 27.5%16,111 49.8%41,087 ▲ +26.0 pp▲ +27,204▲ +22.4 pp▲ +24,976▲ +3.6 pp▲ +2,228
Los Angeles citywide 24.3%420,720 26.6%514,133 28.4%564,032 ▲ +4.0 pp▲ +143,312▲ +1.7 pp▲ +49,899▲ +2.3 pp▲ +93,413
Educational Services 11.6%6,755 11.0%6,419 36.4%29,979 ▲ +24.8 pp▲ +23,224▲ +25.4 pp▲ +23,560▼ −0.7 pp▼ −336
Los Angeles citywide 8.2%142,270 9.1%175,488 10.0%198,175 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +55,905▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,687▲ +0.9 pp▲ +33,218
Health Care & Social Assistance 12.2%7,128 16.5%9,692 13.5%11,108 ▲ +1.2 pp▲ +3,980▼ −3.1 pp▲ +1,416▲ +4.3 pp▲ +2,564
Los Angeles citywide 16.1%278,450 17.5%338,645 18.4%365,857 ▲ +2.3 pp▲ +87,407▲ +0.9 pp▲ +27,212▲ +1.4 pp▲ +60,195
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 19.5%11,325 22.3%13,041 15.7%12,966 ▼ −3.7 pp▲ +1,641▼ −6.5 pp▼ −75▲ +2.8 pp▲ +1,716
Los Angeles citywide 11.2%193,201 11.8%227,143 11.3%224,945 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +31,744▼ −0.4 pp▼ −2,198▲ +0.6 pp▲ +33,942
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 5.5%3,189 6.8%3,974 6.0%4,933 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +1,744▼ −0.8 pp▲ +959▲ +1.3 pp▲ +785
Los Angeles citywide 2.2%38,729 2.8%53,894 2.8%55,106 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +16,377– 0.0 pp▲ +1,212▲ +0.5 pp▲ +15,165
Accommodation & Food Services 14.0%8,136 15.5%9,067 9.7%8,033 ▼ −4.2 pp▼ −103▼ −5.7 pp▼ −1,034▲ +1.5 pp▲ +931
Los Angeles citywide 8.9%154,472 9.0%173,249 8.5%169,839 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +15,367▼ −0.4 pp▼ −3,410– 0.0 pp▲ +18,777
Other Services 4.6%2,698 4.7%2,744 2.3%1,933 ▼ −2.3 pp▼ −765▼ −2.3 pp▼ −811– 0.0 pp▲ +46
Los Angeles citywide 3.9%67,118 3.9%75,505 3.7%73,569 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,451▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,936– 0.0 pp▲ +8,387
Public Administration 0.1%67 0.4%242 0.3%280 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +213▼ −0.1 pp▲ +38▲ +0.3 pp▲ +175
Los Angeles citywide 6.8%117,077 5.8%112,871 5.1%100,972 ▼ −1.7 pp▼ −16,105▼ −0.8 pp▼ −11,899▼ −0.9 pp▼ −4,206

Earnings of Jobs in District 9

Category District 9
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 13.8%11,359
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 29.0%23,885
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 57.2%47,185
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 13.8%11,359 17.0%338,334 ▼ -3.2% 10/15
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 29.0%23,885 24.2%481,976 ▲ +4.7% 7/15
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 57.2%47,185 58.8%1,168,894 ▼ -1.5% 5/15
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 35.0%20,406 24.7%14,493 13.8%11,359 ▼ −21.3 pp▼ −9,047▼ −10.9 pp▼ −3,134▼ −10.3 pp▼ −5,913
Los Angeles citywide 25.4%439,434 21.3%411,730 17.0%338,334 ▼ −8.4 pp▼ −101,100▼ −4.3 pp▼ −73,396▼ −4.1 pp▼ −27,704
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 40.9%23,821 43.6%25,541 29.0%23,885 ▼ −11.9 pp▲ +64▼ −14.6 pp▼ −1,656▲ +2.7 pp▲ +1,720
Los Angeles citywide 31.8%550,232 29.6%571,659 24.2%481,976 ▼ −7.6 pp▼ −68,256▼ −5.4 pp▼ −89,683▼ −2.2 pp▲ +21,427
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 24.0%13,993 31.7%18,577 57.2%47,185 ▲ +33.2 pp▲ +33,192▲ +25.5 pp▲ +28,608▲ +7.7 pp▲ +4,584
Los Angeles citywide 42.8%739,751 49.1%949,070 58.8%1,168,894 ▲ +16.0 pp▲ +429,143▲ +9.6 pp▲ +219,824▲ +6.3 pp▲ +209,319

Jobs in District 9 by Firm Age

Category District 9
Firm age: 0–1 years 3.6%2,715
Firm age: 2–3 years 7.2%5,382
Firm age: 4–5 years 4.0%2,999
Firm age: 6–10 years 9.4%7,021
Firm age: 11 or more years 75.8%56,639
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years 3.6%2,715 4.8%79,589 ▼ -1.1% 13/15
Firm age: 2–3 years 7.2%5,382 4.9%81,747 ▲ +2.3% 3/15
Firm age: 4–5 years 4.0%2,999 5.1%84,784 ▼ -1.1% 13/15
Firm age: 6–10 years 9.4%7,021 10.7%178,901 ▼ -1.3% 13/15
Firm age: 11 or more years 75.8%56,639 74.6%1,248,131 ▲ +1.2% 5/15
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years 6.5%3,403 6.8%3,606 3.6%2,715 ▼ −2.9 pp▼ −688▼ −3.2 pp▼ −891▲ +0.3 pp▲ +203
Los Angeles citywide 4.7%67,650 4.9%79,103 4.8%79,589 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,939▼ −0.1 pp▲ +486▲ +0.2 pp▲ +11,453
Firm age: 2–3 years 7.3%3,857 7.3%3,865 7.2%5,382 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,525▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,517– 0.0 pp▲ +8
Los Angeles citywide 5.9%85,421 5.5%89,737 4.9%81,747 ▼ −1.0 pp▼ −3,674▼ −0.6 pp▼ −7,990▼ −0.4 pp▲ +4,316
Firm age: 4–5 years 5.3%2,759 4.9%2,579 4.0%2,999 ▼ −1.2 pp▲ +240▼ −0.9 pp▲ +420▼ −0.4 pp▼ −180
Los Angeles citywide 4.8%69,694 5.0%80,835 5.1%84,784 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +15,090▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,949▲ +0.2 pp▲ +11,141
Firm age: 6–10 years 10.8%5,686 11.3%5,969 9.4%7,021 ▼ −1.4 pp▲ +1,335▼ −1.9 pp▲ +1,052▲ +0.5 pp▲ +283
Los Angeles citywide 11.5%166,266 9.8%158,422 10.7%178,901 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +12,635▲ +0.9 pp▲ +20,479▼ −1.7 pp▼ −7,844
Firm age: 11 or more years 70.1%36,782 69.7%36,808 75.8%56,639 ▲ +5.7 pp▲ +19,857▲ +6.1 pp▲ +19,831▼ −0.4 pp▲ +26
Los Angeles citywide 73.1%1,057,667 74.8%1,213,952 74.6%1,248,131 ▲ +1.5 pp▲ +190,464▼ −0.2 pp▲ +34,179▲ +1.7 pp▲ +156,285

Jobs in District 9 by Firm Size

Category District 9
Firm size: 0–19 employees 19.3%14,438
Firm size: 20–49 employees 5.6%4,223
Firm size: 50–249 employees 9.3%6,947
Firm size: 250–499 employees 4.5%3,345
Firm size: 500 or more employees 61.3%45,803
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees 19.3%14,438 25.4%425,382 ▼ -6.1% 14/15
Firm size: 20–49 employees 5.6%4,223 9.0%150,177 ▼ -3.3% 15/15
Firm size: 50–249 employees 9.3%6,947 13.5%225,487 ▼ -4.2% 14/15
Firm size: 250–499 employees 4.5%3,345 4.9%82,132 ▼ -0.4% 13/15
Firm size: 500 or more employees 61.3%45,803 47.2%789,974 ▲ +14.1% 1/15
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees 23.4%12,305 27.6%14,589 19.3%14,438 ▼ −4.1 pp▲ +2,133▼ −8.3 pp▼ −151▲ +4.2 pp▲ +2,284
Los Angeles citywide 25.3%366,139 24.7%401,208 25.4%425,382 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +59,243▲ +0.7 pp▲ +24,174▼ −0.6 pp▲ +35,069
Firm size: 20–49 employees 10.5%5,501 8.0%4,220 5.6%4,223 ▼ −4.8 pp▼ −1,278▼ −2.3 pp▲ +3▼ −2.5 pp▼ −1,281
Los Angeles citywide 10.3%149,453 9.2%149,991 9.0%150,177 ▼ −1.4 pp▲ +724▼ −0.3 pp▲ +186▼ −1.1 pp▲ +538
Firm size: 50–249 employees 15.9%8,325 13.0%6,892 9.3%6,947 ▼ −6.6 pp▼ −1,378▼ −3.8 pp▲ +55▼ −2.8 pp▼ −1,433
Los Angeles citywide 14.8%214,453 13.9%225,502 13.5%225,487 ▼ −1.3 pp▲ +11,034▼ −0.4 pp▼ −15▼ −0.9 pp▲ +11,049
Firm size: 250–499 employees 9.7%5,111 6.2%3,287 4.5%3,345 ▼ −5.3 pp▼ −1,766▼ −1.7 pp▲ +58▼ −3.5 pp▼ −1,824
Los Angeles citywide 5.6%81,707 4.9%79,848 4.9%82,132 ▼ −0.7 pp▲ +425– 0.0 pp▲ +2,284▼ −0.7 pp▼ −1,859
Firm size: 500 or more employees 40.5%21,245 45.1%23,839 61.3%45,803 ▲ +20.8 pp▲ +24,558▲ +16.1 pp▲ +21,964▲ +4.6 pp▲ +2,594
Los Angeles citywide 43.9%634,946 47.2%765,500 47.2%789,974 ▲ +3.3 pp▲ +155,028– 0.0 pp▲ +24,474▲ +3.3 pp▲ +130,554

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category District 9
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 19.1% ±0.5 pp19.1%±0.5 pp48,090 ±1,361
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 95.8% ±0.6 pp18.3%±0.1 pp46,051 ±270
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 4.2% ±0.9 pp0.8%±0.2 pp2,039 ±411
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 19.1%±0.5 pp19.1%±0.5 pp48,090±1,361 13.6%±0.1 pp13.6%±0.1 pp524,758±5,328 ▲ +5.5%▲ +5.5% 1/15
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 95.8%±0.6 pp18.3%±0.1 pp46,051±270 86.8%±0.3 pp11.8%±0.0 pp455,658±1,592 ▲ +8.9%▲ +6.5% 1/151/15
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 4.2%±0.9 pp0.8%±0.2 pp2,039±411 13.2%±0.4 pp1.8%±0.1 pp69,100±2,036 ▼ -8.9%▼ -1.0% 15/1514/15
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category District 9
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 11.3% ±0.5 pp11.3%±0.5 pp28,482 ±1,184
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 51.2% ±2.1 pp5.8%±0.2 pp14,578 ±609
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 48.8% ±2.6 pp5.5%±0.3 pp13,904 ±726
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 84.8% ±5.6 pp9.6%±0.6 pp24,150 ±1,592
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 15.2% ±1.8 pp1.7%±0.2 pp4,332 ±519
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 11.3%±0.5 pp11.3%±0.5 pp28,482±1,184 8.1%±0.1 pp8.1%±0.1 pp310,586±4,276 ▲ +3.3%▲ +3.3% 2/15
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 51.2%±2.1 pp5.8%±0.2 pp14,578±609 70.9%±0.7 pp5.7%±0.1 pp220,274±2,032 ▼ -19.7%▲ +0.1% 15/156/15
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 48.8%±2.6 pp5.5%±0.3 pp13,904±726 29.1%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.0 pp90,312±1,878 ▲ +19.7%▲ +3.2% 1/151/15
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 84.8%±5.6 pp9.6%±0.6 pp24,150±1,592 77.3%±0.5 pp6.2%±0.0 pp240,126±1,419 ▲ +7.5%▲ +3.4% 1/152/15
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 15.2%±1.8 pp1.7%±0.2 pp4,332±519 22.7%±0.6 pp1.8%±0.0 pp70,460±1,837 ▼ -7.5%▼ -0.1% 15/158/15
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category District 9
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 5.6% ±0.9 pp2,984 ±454
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 8.7% ±2.0 pp1,698 ±384
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 5.6%±0.9 pp2,984±454 3.9%±0.3 pp— ▲ +1.7% 4/15
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 8.7%±2.0 pp1,698±384 4.2%±0.4 pp— ▲ +4.5% 1/15
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category District 9
Owner-Occupied Households 24.8% ±1.2 pp15,466 ±730
Renter-Occupied Households 75.2% ±1.1 pp46,976 ±710
Owner-Occupied Residents 27.6% ±1.4 pp66,164 ±3,389
Renter-Occupied Residents 72.4% ±1.5 pp173,744 ±3,483
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Owner-Occupied Households 24.8%±1.2 pp15,466±730 36.0%±0.3 pp518,423±4,359 ▼ -11.3% 12/15
Renter-Occupied Households 75.2%±1.1 pp46,976±710 64.0%±0.3 pp920,674±4,643 ▲ +11.3% 4/15
Owner-Occupied Residents 27.6%±1.4 pp66,164±3,389 40.2%±0.4 pp1,509,388±15,216 ▼ -12.6% 12/15
Renter-Occupied Residents 72.4%±1.5 pp173,744±3,483 59.8%±0.4 pp2,243,250±15,217 ▲ +12.6% 4/15
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category District 9
Median Year Moved In 2012±0.4 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later 4.0% ±0.6 pp2,509 ±364
Moved in 2020 to 2022 14.9% ±0.9 pp9,292 ±587
Moved in 2010 to 2019 41.9% ±1.6 pp26,157 ±985
Moved in 2000 to 2009 22.3% ±1.3 pp13,909 ±836
Moved in 1990 to 1999 10.7% ±0.9 pp6,669 ±582
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 6.3% ±0.7 pp3,960 ±417
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Median Year Moved In 2012±0.4 yr 2014±1.0 yr ▼ −2 10/15
Moved in 2023 or Later 4.0%±0.6 pp2,509±364 4.9%±0.1 pp70,211±2,138 ▼ -0.9% 10/15
Moved in 2020 to 2022 14.9%±0.9 pp9,292±587 20.6%±0.3 pp296,921±3,730 ▼ -5.8% 12/15
Moved in 2010 to 2019 41.9%±1.6 pp26,157±985 40.3%±0.3 pp580,466±4,993 ▲ +1.5% 6/15
Moved in 2000 to 2009 22.3%±1.3 pp13,909±836 16.2%±0.2 pp233,668±3,490 ▲ +6.0% 1/15
Moved in 1990 to 1999 10.7%±0.9 pp6,669±582 9.8%±0.2 pp140,815±2,779 ▲ +0.9% 5/15
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 6.3%±0.7 pp3,960±417 8.1%±0.2 pp117,016±2,469 ▼ -1.8% 13/15
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show
Category District 9
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 9.0% ±0.6 pp9.0%±0.6 pp22,257 ±1,472
↳ Moved Within Los Angeles County (of recent movers) 5.3% ±0.5 pp59.7%±4.2 pp13,286 ±1,282
↳ Moved from Different California County (of recent movers) 1.3% ±0.2 pp14.0%±1.6 pp3,106 ±413
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 1.0% ±0.2 pp11.4%±1.5 pp2,530 ±376
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 1.3% ±0.2 pp15.0%±2.4 pp3,336 ±588
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 9.0%±0.6 pp9.0%±0.6 pp22,257±1,472 10.7%±0.2 pp10.7%±0.2 pp408,463±7,943 ▼ -1.7%▼ -1.7% 10/15
↳ Moved Within Los Angeles County (of recent movers) 5.3%±0.5 pp59.7%±4.2 pp13,286±1,282 7.4%±0.2 pp69.3%±1.2 pp283,263±7,240 ▼ -2.1%▼ -9.7% 13/1514/15
↳ Moved from Different California County (of recent movers) 1.3%±0.2 pp14.0%±1.6 pp3,106±413 1.2%±0.0 pp11.0%±0.4 pp45,056±1,766 ▲ +0.1%▲ +2.9% 4/153/15
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 1.0%±0.2 pp11.4%±1.5 pp2,530±376 1.3%±0.1 pp12.3%±0.5 pp50,444±2,220 ▼ -0.3%▼ -1.0% 9/158/15
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 1.3%±0.2 pp15.0%±2.4 pp3,336±588 0.8%±0.0 pp7.3%±0.4 pp29,700±1,624 ▲ +0.6%▲ +7.7% 2/151/15
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show
Category District 9
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 5.7% ±0.6 pp5.7%±0.6 pp3,738 ±397
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 2.1% ±0.4 pp37.5%±6.2 pp1,401 ±276
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.2% ±0.2 pp3.1%±3.4 pp115 ±128
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.1% ±0.2 pp2.3%±3.5 pp86 ±131
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 3.2% ±0.6 pp57.2%±8.5 pp2,137 ±391
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 2.9% ±0.6 pp2.9%±0.6 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 0.7% ±0.8 pp0.7%±0.8 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 5.7%±0.6 pp5.7%±0.6 pp3,738±397 7.4%±0.2 pp7.4%±0.2 pp115,235±3,037 ▼ -1.8%▼ -1.8% 10/15
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 2.1%±0.4 pp37.5%±6.2 pp1,401±276 2.9%±0.1 pp38.6%±1.2 pp44,494±1,787 ▼ -0.7%▼ -1.1% 9/158/15
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.2%±0.2 pp3.1%±3.4 pp115±128 0.3%±0.0 pp4.0%±0.4 pp4,630±529 ▼ -0.1%▼ -0.9% 11/1510/15
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.1%±0.2 pp2.3%±3.5 pp86±131 0.4%±0.0 pp5.6%±0.6 pp6,482±671 ▼ -0.3%▼ -3.3% 14/1512/15
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 3.2%±0.6 pp57.2%±8.5 pp2,137±391 3.8%±0.2 pp51.7%±2.8 pp59,629±3,638 ▼ -0.6%▲ +5.4% 9/156/15
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 2.9%±0.6 pp2.9%±0.6 pp— 4.6%±0.2 pp4.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -1.7%▼ -1.7% 14/15
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 0.7%±0.8 pp0.7%±0.8 pp— 0.9%±0.1 pp0.9%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.1%▼ -0.1% 8/15
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category District 9
Median Year Built 1955±2 yr
Pre-1940 37.7% ±1.4 pp24,915 ±918
1940-2009 55.6% ±1.8 pp36,786 ±1,217
2010+ 6.7% ±0.7 pp4,446 ±479
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Median Year Built 1955±2 yr 1965±1 yr ▼ −10 yrs 14/15
Pre-1940 37.7%±1.4 pp24,915±918 19.1%±0.2 pp296,223±3,073 ▲ +18.6% 2/15
1940-2009 55.6%±1.8 pp36,786±1,217 73.1%±0.4 pp1,136,164±6,801 ▼ -17.5% 13/15
2010+ 6.7%±0.7 pp4,446±479 7.8%±0.2 pp121,945±2,871 ▼ -1.1% 9/15
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category District 9
Population Density 19,292 /sq mi±426/sq mi
Single-Family Homes 54.0% ±1.6 pp35,737 ±1,042
Buildings With 2–4 Units 21.8% ±1.3 pp14,452 ±858
Buildings With 5–19 Units 12.9% ±0.9 pp8,526 ±616
Buildings With 20 or More Units 10.9% ±0.8 pp7,182 ±556
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Population Density 19,292 /sq mi±426/sq mi 8,155 /sq mi±14/sq mi ▲ +11,137 /sq mi 1/15
Single-Family Homes 54.0%±1.6 pp35,737±1,042 41.9%±0.3 pp651,793±4,742 ▲ +12.1% 4/15
Buildings With 2–4 Units 21.8%±1.3 pp14,452±858 9.0%±0.2 pp140,536±2,829 ▲ +12.8% 1/15
Buildings With 5–19 Units 12.9%±0.9 pp8,526±616 18.4%±0.3 pp286,023±4,408 ▼ -5.5% 11/15
Buildings With 20 or More Units 10.9%±0.8 pp7,182±556 29.9%±0.3 pp465,391±4,691 ▼ -19.1% 14/15
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category District 9
Studio 8.4% ±0.7 pp5,559 ±474
1 Bedroom 22.5% ±1.3 pp14,875 ±835
2 Bedrooms 35.6% ±1.3 pp23,539 ±883
3 Bedrooms 22.4% ±1.1 pp14,848 ±738
4 Bedrooms 7.6% ±0.7 pp5,018 ±479
5 or More Bedrooms 3.5% ±0.5 pp2,309 ±344
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Studio 8.4%±0.7 pp5,559±474 11.6%±0.2 pp180,439±3,649 ▼ -3.2% 8/15
1 Bedroom 22.5%±1.3 pp14,875±835 23.7%±0.2 pp367,883±3,808 ▼ -1.2% 9/15
2 Bedrooms 35.6%±1.3 pp23,539±883 30.8%±0.3 pp478,829±4,610 ▲ +4.8% 3/15
3 Bedrooms 22.4%±1.1 pp14,848±738 21.9%±0.2 pp339,889±3,797 ▲ +0.6% 7/15
4 Bedrooms 7.6%±0.7 pp5,018±479 9.1%±0.1 pp140,925±2,101 ▼ -1.5% 8/15
5 or More Bedrooms 3.5%±0.5 pp2,309±344 3.0%±0.1 pp46,367±1,494 ▲ +0.5% 7/15
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show
Category District 9
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 24.7% ±1.4 pp24.7%±1.4 pp15,434 ±844
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 14.7% ±1.1 pp59.7%±2.9 pp9,212 ±669
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 10.0% ±0.9 pp40.3%±2.8 pp6,222 ±549
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 24.7%±1.4 pp24.7%±1.4 pp15,434±844 12.1%±0.2 pp12.1%±0.2 pp174,164±3,256 ▲ +12.6%▲ +12.6% 1/15
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 14.7%±1.1 pp59.7%±2.9 pp9,212±669 5.9%±0.1 pp49.1%±0.8 pp85,502±2,139 ▲ +8.8%▲ +10.6% 1/154/15
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 10.0%±0.9 pp40.3%±2.8 pp6,222±549 6.2%±0.2 pp50.9%±1.1 pp88,662±2,479 ▲ +3.8%▼ -10.6% 3/1512/15
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category District 9
Natural Gas Heat 54.6% ±1.4 pp34,149 ±894
Electric Heat 27.5% ±1.4 pp17,201 ±887
Other Heating Source 17.8% ±1.2 pp11,146 ±744
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Natural Gas Heat 54.6%±1.4 pp34,149±894 57.3%±0.3 pp823,973±4,848 ▼ -2.6% 11/15
Electric Heat 27.5%±1.4 pp17,201±887 34.3%±0.3 pp494,304±4,648 ▼ -6.8% 11/15
Other Heating Source 17.8%±1.2 pp11,146±744 8.4%±0.2 pp120,823±2,850 ▲ +9.4% 1/15
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show
Category District 9
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 21.9% ±1.2 pp13,707 ±759
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 20.1% ±1.3 pp12,551 ±835
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 58.0% ±1.4 pp36,238 ±852
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 32.5% ±1.3 pp20,326 ±787
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 21.9%±1.2 pp13,707±759 18.4%±0.3 pp264,606±4,113 ▲ +3.5% 15/15
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 20.1%±1.3 pp12,551±835 20.5%±0.3 pp294,961±4,022 ▼ -0.4% 12/15
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 58.0%±1.4 pp36,238±852 56.5%±0.3 pp813,715±5,000 ▲ +1.4% 1/15
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 32.5%±1.3 pp20,326±787 31.1%±0.3 pp447,155±4,325 ▲ +1.5% 2/15
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category District 9
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $640±$40
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,097±$23
Median Monthly Housing Costs $1,605±$29
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $2,259±$38
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $640±$40 $787±$11 ▼ −$147 11/15
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,097±$23 $1,347±$8 ▼ −$250 12/15
Median Monthly Housing Costs $1,605±$29 $2,115±$9 ▼ −$510 14/15
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $2,259±$38 Over $3,000 ▼ −$741+ 15/15
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000 Over $3,000 — 1/15
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $631 ±29 $648 ±32 $640 ±40 ▲ +$8▼ −$8▲ +$16
Los Angeles citywide $734 ±7 $763 ±8 $787 ±11 ▲ +$53▲ +$24▲ +$29
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $476 ±22 $528 ±26 $640 ±40 ▲ +$163▲ +$112▲ +$51
Los Angeles citywide $554 ±6 $622 ±7 $787 ±11 ▲ +$233▲ +$165▲ +$68
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,030 ±16 $1,084 ±20 $1,097 ±23 ▲ +$67▲ +$12▲ +$55
Los Angeles citywide $1,206 ±4 $1,299 ±6 $1,347 ±8 ▲ +$141▲ +$48▲ +$93
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $777 ±12 $884 ±16 $1,097 ±23 ▲ +$319▲ +$213▲ +$107
Los Angeles citywide $910 ±3 $1,058 ±5 $1,347 ±8 ▲ +$437▲ +$289▲ +$148
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,444 ±22 $1,544 ±16 $1,605 ±29 ▲ +$161▲ +$61▲ +$100
Los Angeles citywide $1,817 ±7 $1,985 ±7 $2,115 ±9 ▲ +$298▲ +$130▲ +$169
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,090 ±17 $1,258 ±13 $1,605 ±29 ▲ +$515▲ +$347▲ +$168
Los Angeles citywide $1,371 ±5 $1,618 ±6 $2,115 ±9 ▲ +$744▲ +$497▲ +$247
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,033 ±38 $2,142 ±25 $2,259 ±38 ▲ +$225▲ +$117▲ +$109
Los Angeles citywide — $2,970 ±11 — ———
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,535 ±29 $1,746 ±21 $2,259 ±38 ▲ +$724▲ +$513▲ +$211
Los Angeles citywide — $2,420 ±9 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $2,848 ±41 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) — $2,321 ±33 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Rent

Rent measure
Category District 9
Average Rent Plus Utilities $1,656±$32
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $748±$51
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,121±$24
Median Rent Plus Utilities $1,531±$33
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,037±$47
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,672±$87
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities $1,656±$32 $2,131±$12 ▼ −$475 14/15
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $748±$51 $934±$12 ▼ −$186 12/15
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,121±$24 $1,380±$9 ▼ −$259 12/15
Median Rent Plus Utilities $1,531±$33 $1,933±$9 ▼ −$402 13/15
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,037±$47 $2,639±$17 ▼ −$602 15/15
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,672±$87 Over $3,500 ▼ −$828+ 15/15
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9
Average Rent $1,409±$27
10th Percentile Rent $612±$32
25th Percentile Rent $953±$25
Median Rent $1,300±$30
75th Percentile Rent $1,810±$29
90th Percentile Rent $2,335±$49
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Average Rent $1,409±$27 $1,927±$12 ▼ −$518 14/15
10th Percentile Rent $612±$32 $808±$12 ▼ −$196 11/15
25th Percentile Rent $953±$25 $1,217±$8 ▼ −$264 13/15
Median Rent $1,300±$30 $1,765±$8 ▼ −$465 14/15
75th Percentile Rent $1,810±$29 $2,416±$11 ▼ −$606 15/15
90th Percentile Rent $2,335±$49 $3,289±$24 ▼ −$954 15/15
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category District 9
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,357±$74
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,538±$93
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,931±$86
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,520±$83
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,181±$82
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,902±$153
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,357±$74 $4,133±$34 ▼ −$1,775 15/15
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,538±$93 $1,828±$21 ▼ −$290 15/15
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,931±$86 $2,537±$17 ▼ −$606 15/15
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,520±$83 $3,497±$23 ▼ −$977 15/15
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,181±$82 Over $4,000 ▼ −$819+ 15/15
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,902±$153 Over $4,000 ▼ −$98+ 15/15
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,365 ±56 $2,461 ±44 $2,357 ±74 ▼ −$8▼ −$104▲ +$95
Los Angeles citywide $3,870 ±21 $3,856 ±17 $4,133 ±34 ▲ +$263▲ +$276▼ −$13
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,785 ±42 $2,006 ±36 $2,357 ±74 ▲ +$572▲ +$352▲ +$220
Los Angeles citywide $2,920 ±16 $3,143 ±14 $4,133 ±34 ▲ +$1,212▲ +$990▲ +$223
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,408 ±85 $1,483 ±106 $1,538 ±93 ▲ +$130▲ +$55▲ +$75
Los Angeles citywide $1,744 ±13 $1,827 ±19 $1,828 ±21 ▲ +$85▲ +$2▲ +$83
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,062 ±64 $1,208 ±86 $1,538 ±93 ▲ +$475▲ +$329▲ +$146
Los Angeles citywide $1,316 ±10 $1,489 ±15 $1,828 ±21 ▲ +$512▲ +$340▲ +$173
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,899 ±70 $1,937 ±46 $1,931 ±86 ▲ +$33▼ −$6▲ +$38
Los Angeles citywide $2,379 ±13 $2,448 ±17 $2,537 ±17 ▲ +$158▲ +$89▲ +$69
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,433 ±52 $1,579 ±38 $1,931 ±86 ▲ +$499▲ +$353▲ +$146
Los Angeles citywide $1,796 ±10 $1,995 ±14 $2,537 ±17 ▲ +$741▲ +$542▲ +$199
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,409 ±43 $2,417 ±52 $2,520 ±83 ▲ +$111▲ +$103▲ +$8
Los Angeles citywide $3,315 ±21 $3,342 ±16 $3,497 ±23 ▲ +$182▲ +$155▲ +$27
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,818 ±32 $1,970 ±43 $2,520 ±83 ▲ +$702▲ +$550▲ +$152
Los Angeles citywide $2,502 ±16 $2,724 ±13 $3,497 ±23 ▲ +$995▲ +$773▲ +$222
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,069 ±64 $3,061 ±78 $3,181 ±82 ▲ +$112▲ +$120▼ −$8
Los Angeles citywide — $4,663 ±31 — ———
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,316 ±48 $2,494 ±64 $3,181 ±82 ▲ +$865▲ +$686▲ +$178
Los Angeles citywide — $3,800 ±25 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,889 ±92 $3,823 ±156 $3,902 ±153 ▲ +$13▲ +$79▼ −$65
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,935 ±69 $3,116 ±127 $3,902 ±153 ▲ +$967▲ +$786▲ +$181
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category District 9
Average Monthly Owner Costs $739±$50
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $331±$84
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $499±$75
Median Monthly Owner Costs $727±$48
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $988±$120
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,339±$150
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs $739±$50 $1,309±$21 ▼ −$570 15/15
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $331±$84 $456±$10 ▼ −$125 15/15
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $499±$75 $674±$10 ▼ −$175 15/15
Median Monthly Owner Costs $727±$48 $1,001±$14 ▼ −$274 15/15
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $988±$120 $1,491±$15 ▼ −$502 15/15
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,339±$150 Over $1,500 ▼ −$161+ 15/15
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $617 ±23 $684 ±33 $739 ±50 ▲ +$123▲ +$55▲ +$67
Los Angeles citywide $974 ±11 $1,068 ±13 $1,309 ±21 ▲ +$335▲ +$242▲ +$93
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $465 ±17 $557 ±27 $739 ±50 ▲ +$274▲ +$182▲ +$92
Los Angeles citywide $735 ±8 $870 ±11 $1,309 ±21 ▲ +$574▲ +$439▲ +$135
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $310 ±46 $321 ±53 $331 ±84 ▲ +$21▲ +$10▲ +$12
Los Angeles citywide $372 ±7 $397 ±7 $456 ±10 ▲ +$84▲ +$59▲ +$25
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $234 ±35 $262 ±43 $331 ±84 ▲ +$97▲ +$69▲ +$28
Los Angeles citywide $281 ±5 $323 ±6 $456 ±10 ▲ +$176▲ +$133▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $422 ±38 $430 ±53 $499 ±75 ▲ +$77▲ +$69▲ +$8
Los Angeles citywide $544 ±7 $586 ±8 $674 ±10 ▲ +$130▲ +$88▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $319 ±29 $351 ±43 $499 ±75 ▲ +$181▲ +$149▲ +$32
Los Angeles citywide $410 ±5 $478 ±6 $674 ±10 ▲ +$264▲ +$196▲ +$68
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $572 ±33 $620 ±53 $727 ±48 ▲ +$154▲ +$107▲ +$48
Los Angeles citywide $806 ±11 $880 ±10 $1,001 ±14 ▲ +$195▲ +$121▲ +$74
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $432 ±25 $505 ±43 $727 ±48 ▲ +$295▲ +$221▲ +$73
Los Angeles citywide $608 ±8 $717 ±8 $1,001 ±14 ▲ +$393▲ +$284▲ +$109
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $776 ±63 $869 ±96 $988 ±120 ▲ +$212▲ +$119▲ +$93
Los Angeles citywide — $1,304 ±17 $1,491 ±15 —▲ +$187—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $586 ±48 $709 ±78 $988 ±120 ▲ +$402▲ +$280▲ +$123
Los Angeles citywide — $1,062 ±14 $1,491 ±15 —▲ +$428—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $1,166 ±239 $1,339 ±150 —▲ +$173—
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — $950 ±194 $1,339 ±150 —▲ +$389—
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Home Values

Category District 9
Average Home Value $583,255±$28,404
10th Percentile Home Value $337,945±$67,418
25th Percentile Home Value $473,668±$20,068
Median Home Value $606,060±$12,826
75th Percentile Home Value $732,169±$12,234
90th Percentile Home Value $920,024±$24,306
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Average Home Value $583,255±$28,404 $1,264,542±$8,234 ▼ −$681,287 15/15
10th Percentile Home Value $337,945±$67,418 $459,299±$5,965 ▼ −$121,354 14/15
25th Percentile Home Value $473,668±$20,068 $653,300±$4,641 ▼ −$179,632 15/15
Median Home Value $606,060±$12,826 $921,200±$4,782 ▼ −$315,140 15/15
75th Percentile Home Value $732,169±$12,234 $1,397,000±$18,800 ▼ −$664,831 15/15
90th Percentile Home Value $920,024±$24,306 Over $2,000,000 ▼ −$1,079,976+ 15/15
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $333,053 ±10,024 $496,842 ±24,399 $583,255 ±28,404 ▲ +$250,202▲ +$86,413▲ +$163,789
Los Angeles citywide $824,079 ±6,442 $1,055,784 ±9,073 $1,264,542 ±8,234 ▲ +$440,464▲ +$208,758▲ +$231,705
Average Home Value (nominal dollars) $251,350 ±7,565 $404,927 ±19,885 $583,255 ±28,404 ▲ +$331,906▲ +$178,328▲ +$153,578
Los Angeles citywide $621,919 ±4,862 $860,465 ±7,394 $1,264,542 ±8,234 ▲ +$642,624▲ +$404,077▲ +$238,547
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $175,834 ±17,748 $272,752 ±22,534 $337,945 ±67,418 ▲ +$162,111▲ +$65,193▲ +$96,918
Los Angeles citywide $274,172 ±2,766 $388,878 ±2,619 $459,299 ±5,965 ▲ +$185,126▲ +$70,421▲ +$114,706
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $132,699 ±13,394 $222,293 ±18,365 $337,945 ±67,418 ▲ +$205,246▲ +$115,652▲ +$89,594
Los Angeles citywide $206,913 ±2,087 $316,936 ±2,134 $459,299 ±5,965 ▲ +$252,385▲ +$142,362▲ +$110,023
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $258,941 ±14,423 $376,142 ±10,238 $473,668 ±20,068 ▲ +$214,727▲ +$97,526▲ +$117,201
Los Angeles citywide $413,153 ±2,182 $543,435 ±2,444 $653,300 ±4,641 ▲ +$240,147▲ +$109,865▲ +$130,281
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $195,419 ±10,885 $306,556 ±8,344 $473,668 ±20,068 ▲ +$278,249▲ +$167,112▲ +$111,138
Los Angeles citywide $311,800 ±1,647 $442,900 ±1,992 $653,300 ±4,641 ▲ +$341,500▲ +$210,400▲ +$131,100
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $344,643 ±7,706 $468,473 ±7,873 $606,060 ±12,826 ▲ +$261,417▲ +$137,587▲ +$123,830
Los Angeles citywide $601,311 ±2,870 $781,471 ±2,656 $921,200 ±4,782 ▲ +$319,889▲ +$139,729▲ +$180,160
Median Home Value (nominal dollars) $260,096 ±5,815 $381,806 ±6,416 $606,060 ±12,826 ▲ +$345,963▲ +$224,254▲ +$121,710
Los Angeles citywide $453,800 ±2,166 $636,900 ±2,165 $921,200 ±4,782 ▲ +$467,400▲ +$284,300▲ +$183,100
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $452,510 ±10,983 $594,079 ±10,720 $732,169 ±12,234 ▲ +$279,659▲ +$138,090▲ +$141,569
Los Angeles citywide $957,885 ±4,252 $1,163,924 ±5,481 $1,397,000 ±18,800 ▲ +$439,115▲ +$233,076▲ +$206,040
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $341,502 ±8,289 $484,175 ±8,737 $732,169 ±12,234 ▲ +$390,667▲ +$247,994▲ +$142,673
Los Angeles citywide $722,900 ±3,209 $948,600 ±4,467 $1,397,000 ±18,800 ▲ +$674,100▲ +$448,400▲ +$225,700
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $565,583 ±27,337 $807,309 ±23,578 $920,024 ±24,306 ▲ +$354,441▲ +$112,715▲ +$241,726
Los Angeles citywide — $2,103,035 ±25,625 — ———
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $426,836 ±20,631 $657,958 ±19,216 $920,024 ±24,306 ▲ +$493,187▲ +$262,066▲ +$231,122
Los Angeles citywide — $1,713,977 ±20,884 — ———

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show
Category District 9
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 10.5%10.5%6,957
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 7.1%67.6%4,706
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 1.2%11.9%827
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 1.8%16.7%1,164
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.4%3.7%259
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 10.5%10.5%6,957 5.5%5.5%84,827 ▲ +5.1%▲ +5.1% 2/15
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 7.1%67.6%4,706 3.5%64.0%54,313 ▲ +3.6%▲ +3.6% 2/155/15
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 1.2%11.9%827 0.4%7.1%6,040 ▲ +0.9%▲ +4.8% 2/154/15
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 1.8%16.7%1,164 1.4%25.1%21,260 ▲ +0.4%▼ -8.3% 6/1511/15
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.4%3.7%259 0.2%3.8%3,214 ▲ +0.2%▼ -0.1% 2/158/15
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units 10.7%6,673 11.0%7,195 10.5%6,957 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +284▼ −0.5 pp▼ −238▲ +0.2 pp▲ +522
Los Angeles citywide 5.6%79,280 5.5%82,357 5.5%84,827 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5,547▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,470– 0.0 pp▲ +3,077
Housing Choice Vouchers 7.3%4,530 7.6%4,977 7.1%4,706 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +176▼ −0.5 pp▼ −271▲ +0.3 pp▲ +447
Los Angeles citywide 3.4%47,994 3.4%50,854 3.5%54,313 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +6,319▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,459– 0.0 pp▲ +2,860
Public Housing 1.3%821 1.3%824 1.3%827 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +6– 0.0 pp▲ +3▼ −0.1 pp▲ +3
Los Angeles citywide 0.5%7,024 0.5%7,038 0.4%6,040 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −984▼ −0.1 pp▼ −998– 0.0 pp▲ +14
Project-Based Section 8 1.8%1,140 1.7%1,133 1.8%1,164 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +24– 0.0 pp▲ +31▼ −0.1 pp▼ −7
Los Angeles citywide 1.5%21,053 1.4%21,190 1.4%21,260 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +207▼ −0.1 pp▲ +70▼ −0.1 pp▲ +137
Other Project-Based Programs 0.3%181 0.4%259 0.4%259 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +78– 0.0 pp– 0▲ +0.1 pp▲ +78
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%3,209 0.2%3,275 0.2%3,214 – 0.0 pp▲ +5– 0.0 pp▼ −61– 0.0 pp▲ +66
Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category District 9
Average Household Income $21,984
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $583
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,580
Below 30% of Area Median Income 85.6%5,274
With Children 31.7%1,953
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 36.9%2,273
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this district. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this district. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this district.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $21,984 $20,771 ▲ +$1,213 4/15
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $583 $532 ▲ +$51 4/15
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,580 $1,653 ▼ -$73 11/15
Below 30% of Area Median Income 85.6%5,274 88.0%66,617 ▼ -2.4 pp 11/15
With Children 31.7%1,953 20.0%15,140 ▲ +11.7 pp 2/15
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 36.9%2,273 43.0%32,551 ▼ -6.1 pp 13/15
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this district. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this district. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this district.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income $14,243 $17,558 $21,954 ▲ +$7,712▲ +$4,396▲ +$3,315
Los Angeles citywide $14,082 $16,770 $20,771 ▲ +$6,689▲ +$4,001▲ +$2,688
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $392 $463 $583 ▲ +$190▲ +$120▲ +$70
Los Angeles citywide $372 $432 $532 ▲ +$160▲ +$100▲ +$60
Average Monthly Government Spending $770 $966 $1,585 ▲ +$814▲ +$619▲ +$195
Los Angeles citywide $795 $1,013 $1,653 ▲ +$858▲ +$640▲ +$218
Below 30% of Area Median Income 82.9%— 83.2%— 85.6%— ▲ +2.7 pp—▲ +2.4 pp—▲ +0.3 pp—
Los Angeles citywide 84.0%— 85.0%— 88.0%— ▲ +4.0 pp—▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children — — 31.6%— ——————
Los Angeles citywide — — 20.0%— ——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 32.4%— 34.8%— 37.0%— ▲ +4.6 pp—▲ +2.2 pp—▲ +2.4 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category District 9
Total Tree Canopy 5.7%465 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 87.5%7,110 acres
Natural Open Surfaces 6.8%551 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Total Tree Canopy 5.7%465 acres 15.3%46,226 acres ▼ -9.6% 13/15
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 87.5%7,110 acres 56.2%170,078 acres ▲ +31.3% 1/15
Natural Open Surfaces 6.8%551 acres 28.5%86,111 acres ▼ -21.7% 15/15
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category District 9
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 9.9% ±1.3 pp24,917 ±3,175
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 45.7% ±1.8 pp114,774 ±4,402
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 44.4% ±1.6 pp111,727 ±4,147
Heat Exposed 0.0%0
Homes Without Air Conditioning 35.8%89,964
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. Heat Exposed is the share of residents living in census tracts the Census Bureau flagged as exposed to extreme heat in 2022. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates; neither those nor the heat exposure figures have a margin of error, as with CDC PLACES data.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 9.9%±1.3 pp24,917±3,175 19.5%±0.3 pp751,486±13,284 ▼ -9.6% 15/15
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 45.7%±1.8 pp114,774±4,402 47.6%±0.4 pp1,834,137±16,773 ▼ -1.9% 12/15
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 44.4%±1.6 pp111,727±4,147 33.0%±0.4 pp1,271,640±15,551 ▲ +11.5% 1/15
Heat Exposed 0.0%0 52.6%2,029,926 ▼ -52.6% 12/15
Homes Without Air Conditioning 35.8%89,964 19.5%751,605 ▲ +16.3% 3/15
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. Heat Exposed is the share of residents living in census tracts the Census Bureau flagged as exposed to extreme heat in 2022. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates; neither those nor the heat exposure figures have a margin of error, as with CDC PLACES data.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category District 9
Drove Alone 63.8% ±1.4 pp63,040 ±1,389
Carpooled 14.8% ±1.1 pp14,636 ±1,074
Public Transit 11.8% ±0.9 pp11,646 ±841
Walked 5.2% ±0.5 pp5,131 ±495
Bikes 1.2% ±0.3 pp1,145 ±289
Other Commute Mode 2.6% ±0.6 pp2,583 ±567
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Drove Alone 63.8%±1.4 pp63,040±1,389 74.3%±0.1 pp1,409,806±2,191 ▼ -10.6% 14/15
Carpooled 14.8%±1.1 pp14,636±1,074 10.8%±0.2 pp204,995±4,626 ▲ +4.0% 1/15
Public Transit 11.8%±0.9 pp11,646±841 7.6%±0.2 pp144,003±3,960 ▲ +4.2% 4/15
Walked 5.2%±0.5 pp5,131±495 4.0%±0.1 pp75,140±2,786 ▲ +1.2% 5/15
Bikes 1.2%±0.3 pp1,145±289 0.7%±0.1 pp13,831±1,185 ▲ +0.4% 3/15
Other Commute Mode 2.6%±0.6 pp2,583±567 2.6%±0.1 pp49,004±2,073 0% 2/15
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category District 9
Average Commute Time (minutes) 34 min±0.5 min
Less Than 15 Minutes 11.0% ±0.7 pp10,811 ±734
15–29 Minutes 29.7% ±1.2 pp29,240 ±1,193
30–44 Minutes 33.2% ±1.2 pp32,717 ±1,170
45–59 Minutes 10.5% ±0.8 pp10,339 ±782
60 Minutes or More 15.7% ±1.0 pp15,445 ±981
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes) 34 min±0.5 min 31 min±0.2 min ▲ +3 min 2/15
Less Than 15 Minutes 11.0%±0.7 pp10,811±734 15.9%±0.3 pp241,948±4,532 ▼ -4.9% 14/15
15–29 Minutes 29.7%±1.2 pp29,240±1,193 33.1%±0.3 pp504,776±4,959 ▼ -3.4% 14/15
30–44 Minutes 33.2%±1.2 pp32,717±1,170 28.9%±0.3 pp440,595±5,010 ▲ +4.3% 3/15
45–59 Minutes 10.5%±0.8 pp10,339±782 10.3%±0.2 pp156,750±2,883 ▲ +0.2% 6/15
60 Minutes or More 15.7%±1.0 pp15,445±981 11.9%±0.2 pp182,392±3,293 ▲ +3.7% 2/15
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category District 9
Average Vehicles per Household 1.65±0.05
Households With No Vehicle 17.1% ±1.1 pp10,666 ±676
Households With 1 Vehicle 33.2% ±1.4 pp20,718 ±866
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 49.8% ±1.7 pp31,112 ±1,072
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Average Vehicles per Household 1.65±0.05 1.61±0.01 ▲ +0.04 6/15
Households With No Vehicle 17.1%±1.1 pp10,666±676 11.9%±0.2 pp171,011±3,141 ▲ +5.2% 5/15
Households With 1 Vehicle 33.2%±1.4 pp20,718±866 40.0%±0.3 pp575,741±4,305 ▼ -6.9% 12/15
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 49.8%±1.7 pp31,112±1,072 48.1%±0.4 pp692,345±5,259 ▲ +1.7% 7/15
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where District 9 Residents Work

Category District 9
Downtown 7.8%6,903
Westlake 2.4%2,127
Westchester 2.2%1,916
Historic South-Central 2.1%1,859
Koreatown 1.5%1,344
All other city neighborhoods 28.3%24,908
Outside the city 55.6%48,902
Vernon city, CA 2.3%2,022
Culver City city, CA 2.2%1,925
Carson city, CA 1.7%1,482
Long Beach city, CA 1.6%1,414
Torrance city, CA 1.5%1,316
All other California locations 45.6%40,103
Out of state 0.7%640
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for district 9 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category District 9 City Difference
Downtown 7.8%6,903 5.7%102,334 ▲ +2.1%
Westlake 2.4%2,127 1.5%26,376 ▲ +0.9%
Westchester 2.2%1,916 1.2%22,331 ▲ +0.9%
Historic South-Central 2.1%1,859 0.4%7,284 ▲ +1.7%
Koreatown 1.5%1,344 1.3%23,504 ▲ +0.2%
All other city neighborhoods 28.3%24,908 32.3%577,272 ▼ -4.0%
Outside the city 55.6%48,902 49.1%879,015 ▲ +6.5%
Vernon city, CA 2.3%2,022 NA%— —
Culver City city, CA 2.2%1,925 NA%— —
Carson city, CA 1.7%1,482 NA%— —
Long Beach city, CA 1.6%1,414 NA%— —
Torrance city, CA 1.5%1,316 NA%— —
All other California locations 45.6%40,103 30.8%550,181 ▲ +14.8%
Out of state 0.7%640 0.9%15,602 ▼ -0.1%
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for district 9 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Downtown 9.2%6,523 8.5%7,188 7.8%6,903 ▼ −1.3 pp▲ +380▼ −0.7 pp▼ −285▼ −0.7 pp▲ +665
Los Angeles citywide 6.5%101,787 6.3%110,096 5.7%102,334 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +547▼ −0.5 pp▼ −7,762▼ −0.3 pp▲ +8,309
Westlake 2.5%1,743 2.4%2,053 2.4%2,127 – 0.0 pp▲ +384– 0.0 pp▲ +74– 0.0 pp▲ +310
Los Angeles citywide 1.6%24,688 1.5%26,406 1.5%26,376 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,688– 0.0 pp▼ −30▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,718
Westchester 2.2%1,567 2.5%2,087 2.2%1,916 – 0.0 pp▲ +349▼ −0.3 pp▼ −171▲ +0.3 pp▲ +520
Los Angeles citywide 1.4%21,796 1.5%25,859 1.2%22,331 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +535▼ −0.2 pp▼ −3,528▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,063
Historic South-Central 2.2%1,578 2.0%1,697 2.1%1,859 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +281▲ +0.1 pp▲ +162▼ −0.2 pp▲ +119
Los Angeles citywide 0.4%6,757 0.4%6,928 0.4%7,284 – 0.0 pp▲ +527– 0.0 pp▲ +356– 0.0 pp▲ +171
Koreatown 1.4%1,005 1.5%1,258 1.5%1,344 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +339– 0.0 pp▲ +86▲ +0.1 pp▲ +253
Los Angeles citywide 1.4%22,136 1.3%22,395 1.3%23,504 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,368– 0.0 pp▲ +1,109▼ −0.1 pp▲ +259
All other city neighborhoods 27.1%19,202 27.6%23,302 28.3%24,908 ▲ +1.3 pp▲ +5,706▲ +0.7 pp▲ +1,606▲ +0.6 pp▲ +4,100
Los Angeles citywide 31.2%488,847 31.5%555,449 32.3%577,272 ▲ +1.0 pp▲ +88,425▲ +0.7 pp▲ +21,823▲ +0.3 pp▲ +66,602
Outside the city 55.4%39,297 55.4%46,778 55.6%48,902 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +9,605▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,124▲ +0.1 pp▲ +7,481
Los Angeles citywide 49.2%770,649 48.8%859,004 49.1%879,015 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +108,366▲ +0.4 pp▲ +20,011▼ −0.5 pp▲ +88,355
Vernon city, CA 2.8%2,003 2.5%2,138 2.3%2,022 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +19▼ −0.2 pp▼ −116▼ −0.3 pp▲ +135
Los Angeles citywide 0.7%10,750 0.6%10,312 0.5%9,507 ▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,243▼ −0.1 pp▼ −805▼ −0.1 pp▼ −438
Culver City city, CA 1.5%1,097 2.0%1,717 2.2%1,925 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +828▲ +0.2 pp▲ +208▲ +0.5 pp▲ +620
Los Angeles citywide 2.1%32,510 1.8%31,682 1.8%33,029 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +519– 0.0 pp▲ +1,347▼ −0.3 pp▼ −828
Carson city, CA 1.4%996 1.5%1,224 1.7%1,482 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +486▲ +0.2 pp▲ +258– 0.0 pp▲ +228
Los Angeles citywide 0.6%9,514 0.6%10,433 0.6%11,120 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,606– 0.0 pp▲ +687– 0.0 pp▲ +919
Long Beach city, CA 1.7%1,189 1.6%1,349 1.6%1,414 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +225– 0.0 pp▲ +65▼ −0.1 pp▲ +160
Los Angeles citywide 1.2%18,697 1.0%18,144 1.1%18,953 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +256– 0.0 pp▲ +809▼ −0.2 pp▼ −553
Torrance city, CA 1.4%985 1.6%1,326 1.5%1,316 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +331▼ −0.1 pp▼ −10▲ +0.2 pp▲ +341
Los Angeles citywide 1.2%18,644 1.2%20,681 1.1%19,569 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +925▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,112– 0.0 pp▲ +2,037
All other California locations 44.9%31,861 45.3%38,196 45.6%40,103 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +8,242▲ +0.3 pp▲ +1,907▲ +0.4 pp▲ +6,335
Los Angeles citywide 31.6%494,091 30.2%531,945 30.8%550,181 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +56,090▲ +0.6 pp▲ +18,236▼ −1.4 pp▲ +37,854
Out of state 0.8%596 0.8%638 0.7%640 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +44– 0.0 pp▲ +2▼ −0.1 pp▲ +42
Los Angeles citywide 0.8%12,591 0.9%15,246 0.9%15,602 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,011– 0.0 pp▲ +356▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,655

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in District 9

Category District 9
Historic South-Central 1.8%1,510
Central-Alameda 1.7%1,432
Koreatown 1.7%1,411
Westlake 1.7%1,409
Florence 1.6%1,308
All other city neighborhoods 33.7%27,806
Outside the city 57.7%47,553
Long Beach city, CA 1.8%1,511
East Los Angeles CDP, CA 1.7%1,388
Glendale city, CA 1.7%1,366
Pasadena city, CA 1.4%1,156
South Gate city, CA 1.3%1,043
All other California locations 49.3%40,601
Out of state 0.6%488
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for people working in district 9; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category District 9 City Difference
Historic South-Central 1.8%1,510 0.4%8,025 ▲ +1.4%
Central-Alameda 1.7%1,432 0.3%6,723 ▲ +1.4%
Koreatown 1.7%1,411 1.4%27,358 ▲ +0.3%
Westlake 1.7%1,409 1.1%21,722 ▲ +0.6%
Florence 1.6%1,308 0.4%7,275 ▲ +1.2%
All other city neighborhoods 33.7%27,806 34.3%683,260 ▼ -0.6%
Outside the city 57.7%47,553 54.2%1,078,898 ▲ +3.5%
Long Beach city, CA 1.8%1,511 NA%— —
East Los Angeles CDP, CA 1.7%1,388 NA%— —
Glendale city, CA 1.7%1,366 NA%— —
Pasadena city, CA 1.4%1,156 NA%— —
South Gate city, CA 1.3%1,043 NA%— —
All other California locations 49.3%40,601 43.5%864,880 ▲ +5.8%
Out of state 0.6%488 1.4%27,219 ▼ -0.8%
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for people working in district 9; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Historic South-Central 2.2%1,267 2.5%1,484 1.8%1,510 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +243▼ −0.7 pp▲ +26▲ +0.4 pp▲ +217
Los Angeles citywide 0.4%6,408 0.4%7,695 0.4%8,025 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,617– 0.0 pp▲ +330– 0.0 pp▲ +1,287
Central-Alameda 1.9%1,127 2.2%1,281 1.7%1,432 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +305▼ −0.4 pp▲ +151▲ +0.2 pp▲ +154
Los Angeles citywide 0.3%5,325 0.3%6,349 0.3%6,723 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,398– 0.0 pp▲ +374– 0.0 pp▲ +1,024
Koreatown 1.7%970 1.7%1,022 1.7%1,411 – 0.0 pp▲ +441– 0.0 pp▲ +389▲ +0.1 pp▲ +52
Los Angeles citywide 1.3%22,579 1.4%26,525 1.4%27,358 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,779– 0.0 pp▲ +833▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,946
Westlake 1.7%989 2.0%1,176 1.7%1,409 – 0.0 pp▲ +420▼ −0.3 pp▲ +233▲ +0.3 pp▲ +187
Los Angeles citywide 1.0%17,656 1.1%21,188 1.1%21,722 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,066– 0.0 pp▲ +534▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,532
Florence 1.9%1,094 2.1%1,235 1.6%1,308 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +214▼ −0.5 pp▲ +73▲ +0.2 pp▲ +141
Los Angeles citywide 0.3%6,039 0.4%7,121 0.4%7,275 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,236– 0.0 pp▲ +154– 0.0 pp▲ +1,082
All other city neighborhoods 33.8%19,662 33.9%19,877 33.7%27,806 – 0.0 pp▲ +8,144▼ −0.2 pp▲ +7,929▲ +0.1 pp▲ +215
Los Angeles citywide 34.6%598,998 35.0%676,100 34.3%683,260 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +84,262▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,160▲ +0.4 pp▲ +77,102
Outside the city 56.9%33,110 55.4%32,448 57.7%47,553 ▲ +0.8 pp▲ +14,443▲ +2.3 pp▲ +15,105▼ −1.5 pp▼ −662
Los Angeles citywide 54.0%933,978 53.3%1,029,698 54.2%1,078,898 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +144,920▲ +1.0 pp▲ +49,200▼ −0.7 pp▲ +95,720
Long Beach city, CA 1.8%1,021 1.7%1,018 1.8%1,511 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +490▲ +0.1 pp▲ +493– 0.0 pp▼ −3
Los Angeles citywide 1.6%27,863 1.6%31,820 1.6%32,264 – 0.0 pp▲ +4,401– 0.0 pp▲ +444– 0.0 pp▲ +3,957
East Los Angeles CDP, CA 1.7%973 1.7%1,022 1.7%1,388 – 0.0 pp▲ +415▼ −0.1 pp▲ +366▲ +0.1 pp▲ +49
Los Angeles citywide 0.7%12,593 0.7%14,429 0.7%14,851 – 0.0 pp▲ +2,258– 0.0 pp▲ +422– 0.0 pp▲ +1,836
Glendale city, CA 1.3%785 1.1%654 1.7%1,366 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +581▲ +0.5 pp▲ +712▼ −0.2 pp▼ −131
Los Angeles citywide 1.9%33,207 1.8%35,580 1.7%34,750 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +1,543▼ −0.1 pp▼ −830▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,373
Pasadena city, CA 0.8%455 0.7%416 1.4%1,156 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +701▲ +0.7 pp▲ +740▼ −0.1 pp▼ −39
Los Angeles citywide 0.9%15,393 1.0%18,438 0.9%18,761 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,368– 0.0 pp▲ +323▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,045
South Gate city, CA 1.5%846 1.5%908 1.3%1,043 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +197▼ −0.3 pp▲ +135▲ +0.1 pp▲ +62
Los Angeles citywide 0.5%8,641 0.5%9,704 0.5%9,994 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,353– 0.0 pp▲ +290– 0.0 pp▲ +1,063
All other California locations 48.0%27,965 46.6%27,314 49.3%40,601 ▲ +1.2 pp▲ +12,636▲ +2.7 pp▲ +13,287▼ −1.4 pp▼ −651
Los Angeles citywide 43.4%751,264 42.5%821,105 43.5%864,880 – 0.0 pp▲ +113,616▲ +1.0 pp▲ +43,775▼ −1.0 pp▲ +69,841
Out of state 0.9%502 0.7%431 0.6%488 ▼ −0.3 pp▼ −14▼ −0.1 pp▲ +57▼ −0.1 pp▼ −71
Los Angeles citywide 0.7%12,236 0.9%18,326 1.4%27,219 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +14,983▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,893▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,090

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category District 9
No Computer or Smartphone 4.6% ±0.6 pp2,881 ±380
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 18.3% ±1.2 pp11,424 ±736
Desktop or Laptop Available 65.5% ±1.4 pp40,954 ±865
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
No Computer or Smartphone 4.6%±0.6 pp2,881±380 3.6%±0.1 pp51,208±2,038 ▲ +1.1% 5/15
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 18.3%±1.2 pp11,424±736 9.4%±0.2 pp134,973±3,565 ▲ +8.9% 1/15
Desktop or Laptop Available 65.5%±1.4 pp40,954±865 81.8%±0.3 pp1,177,551±4,293 ▼ -16.3% 15/15
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category District 9
Has Internet Access 90.5% ±0.9 pp56,538 ±554
Cellular Data Plan Only 14.4% ±1.1 pp8,978 ±662
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 3.1% ±0.5 pp1,927 ±285
No Internet Access 9.5% ±0.9 pp5,958 ±573
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Has Internet Access 90.5%±0.9 pp56,538±554 94.6%±0.2 pp1,361,126±2,605 ▼ -4.1% 14/15
Cellular Data Plan Only 14.4%±1.1 pp8,978±662 11.8%±0.2 pp169,117±3,594 ▲ +2.6% 4/15
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 3.1%±0.5 pp1,927±285 1.9%±0.1 pp27,326±1,276 ▲ +1.2% 1/15
No Internet Access 9.5%±0.9 pp5,958±573 5.4%±0.2 pp77,971±2,871 ▲ +4.1% 2/15
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category District 9
Uninsured Residents 14.9% ±0.6 pp37,489 ±1,628
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 4.2% ±0.8 pp10,647 ±1,975
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 20.8% ±1.0 pp52,195 ±2,412
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 5.4% ±1.7 pp13,617 ±4,396
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Uninsured Residents 14.9%±0.6 pp37,489±1,628 9.5%±0.1 pp364,737±5,710 ▲ +5.5% 2/15
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 4.2%±0.8 pp10,647±1,975 3.3%±0.2 pp125,674±9,298 ▲ +1.0% 1/15
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 20.8%±1.0 pp52,195±2,412 13.1%±0.2 pp506,732±8,178 ▲ +7.6% 2/15
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 5.4%±1.7 pp13,617±4,396 1.9%±0.2 pp72,725±8,236 ▲ +3.5% 1/15
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category District 9
Insured (Any Coverage) 85.1% ±0.6 pp213,307 ±1,624
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 21.3% ±0.8 pp53,422 ±1,902
Direct-Purchase Insurance 5.2% ±0.4 pp13,067 ±972
Medicare 8.0% ±0.4 pp20,059 ±1,087
Medicaid 52.9% ±0.7 pp132,643 ±1,782
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.2% ±0.1 pp451 ±372
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 3.0% ±0.3 pp7,397 ±823
Uninsured 14.9% ±0.6 pp37,381 ±1,624
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Insured (Any Coverage) 85.1%±0.6 pp213,307±1,624 90.5%±0.2 pp3,468,249±6,113 ▼ -5.5% 14/15
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 21.3%±0.8 pp53,422±1,902 40.6%±0.3 pp1,556,236±11,598 ▼ -19.3% 15/15
Direct-Purchase Insurance 5.2%±0.4 pp13,067±972 11.5%±0.2 pp439,171±6,009 ▼ -6.3% 14/15
Medicare 8.0%±0.4 pp20,059±1,087 13.1%±0.2 pp502,686±5,846 ▼ -5.1% 15/15
Medicaid 52.9%±0.7 pp132,643±1,782 30.1%±0.2 pp1,152,695±9,490 ▲ +22.8% 1/15
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.2%±0.1 pp451±372 0.2%±0.0 pp8,178±741 0% 9/15
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 3.0%±0.3 pp7,397±823 4.2%±0.1 pp160,627±3,851 ▼ -1.2% 15/15
Uninsured 14.9%±0.6 pp37,381±1,624 9.5%±0.2 pp362,202±6,113 ▲ +5.5% 2/15
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category District 9
Adults With at Least One Disability 14.8% ±0.6 pp27,511 ±1,165
Mobility Disability 8.4% ±0.5 pp15,680 ±913
Hearing Disability 2.5% ±0.3 pp4,647 ±552
Vision Disability 4.0% ±0.4 pp7,379 ±654
Cognitive Disability 5.7% ±0.4 pp10,574 ±819
Self-Care Disability 3.6% ±0.4 pp6,705 ±683
Independent Living Disability 6.4% ±0.4 pp11,892 ±826
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability 14.8%±0.6 pp27,511±1,165 13.4%±0.2 pp413,424±4,833 ▲ +1.4% 3/15
Mobility Disability 8.4%±0.5 pp15,680±913 7.1%±0.1 pp220,306±3,715 ▲ +1.3% 2/15
Hearing Disability 2.5%±0.3 pp4,647±552 3.0%±0.1 pp92,708±2,400 ▼ -0.5% 15/15
Vision Disability 4.0%±0.4 pp7,379±654 2.7%±0.1 pp83,292±2,320 ▲ +1.3% 2/15
Cognitive Disability 5.7%±0.4 pp10,574±819 5.1%±0.1 pp158,649±3,239 ▲ +0.6% 4/15
Self-Care Disability 3.6%±0.4 pp6,705±683 3.4%±0.1 pp104,391±2,633 ▲ +0.2% 6/15
Independent Living Disability 6.4%±0.4 pp11,892±826 6.1%±0.1 pp187,616±3,478 ▲ +0.3% 8/15
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category District 9
Arthritis 17.8%34,466
High Blood Pressure 30.4%58,903
Cancer 3.2%6,175
Current Asthma 10.4%20,154
Coronary Heart Disease 5.6%10,851
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 6.3%12,284
Diabetes 15.3%29,584
High Cholesterol 33.8%65,444
Obesity 34.8%67,374
Stroke 3.8%7,351
Lost All Natural Teeth 2.3%4,396
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Arthritis 17.8%34,466 18.8%558,377 ▼ -1.0% 12/15
High Blood Pressure 30.4%58,903 28.8%855,387 ▲ +1.6% 4/15
Cancer 3.2%6,175 5.4%160,385 ▼ -2.2% 15/15
Current Asthma 10.4%20,154 9.4%279,189 ▲ +1.0% 2/15
Coronary Heart Disease 5.6%10,851 5.0%148,505 ▲ +0.6% 2/15
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 6.3%12,284 4.9%145,535 ▲ +1.4% 1/15
Diabetes 15.3%29,584 11.9%353,441 ▲ +3.4% 2/15
High Cholesterol 33.8%65,444 35.2%1,045,473 ▼ -1.4% 13/15
Obesity 34.8%67,374 27.3%810,835 ▲ +7.5% 1/15
Stroke 3.8%7,351 3.1%92,073 ▲ +0.7% 2/15
Lost All Natural Teeth 2.3%4,396 1.9%55,491 ▲ +0.4% 5/15
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category District 9
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 14.8%28,723
Current Cigarette Smoking 17.8%34,404
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 39.7%76,949
Short Sleep Duration 41.6%80,490
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 14.8%28,723 15.9%472,245 ▼ -1.1% 12/15
Current Cigarette Smoking 17.8%34,404 11.9%353,441 ▲ +5.9% 1/15
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 39.7%76,949 26.5%787,075 ▲ +13.2% 1/15
Short Sleep Duration 41.6%80,490 36.5%1,084,084 ▲ +5.1% 2/15
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category District 9
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 39.9%77,182
Frequent Physical Distress 19.8%38,282
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 39.9%77,182 25.1%745,493 ▲ +14.8% 1/15
Frequent Physical Distress 19.8%38,282 14.4%427,693 ▲ +5.4% 1/15
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category District 9
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 64.2%124,196
Routine Checkup in Past Year 66.2%128,096
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 74.7%144,634
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 41.4%80,213
Dental Visit in Past Year 42.1%81,546
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 68.7%133,080
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 64.2%124,196 69.3%2,058,274 ▼ -5.1% 14/15
Routine Checkup in Past Year 66.2%128,096 70.5%2,093,916 ▼ -4.3% 15/15
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 74.7%144,634 83.0%2,465,177 ▼ -8.3% 15/15
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 41.4%80,213 54.0%1,603,850 ▼ -12.6% 15/15
Dental Visit in Past Year 42.1%81,546 58.9%1,749,385 ▼ -16.8% 15/15
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 68.7%133,080 74.8%2,221,630 ▼ -6.1% 15/15
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category District 9
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 21.8%42,265
Frequent Mental Distress 22.1%42,853
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 37.8%73,190
Loneliness 47.1%91,191
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category District 9 City Difference Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 21.8%42,265 20.4%605,899 ▲ +1.4% 1/15
Frequent Mental Distress 22.1%42,853 17.4%516,796 ▲ +4.7% 1/15
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 37.8%73,190 31.2%926,669 ▲ +6.6% 1/15
Loneliness 47.1%91,191 41.3%1,226,648 ▲ +5.8% 1/15
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

vs
Compare All Districts