Los Angeles City Council District 8 Demographics, Housing & Census Data

Los Angeles City Council District 8 Census and ACS demographic tables: population, race, age, income, poverty, rent, housing types, single-family homes, commute, education, internet access, health insurance, and disability.

Los Angeles City Council District 8

Marqueece Harris-Dawson
Marqueece Harris-Dawson
District 8 Council Member

District 8 at a Glance

Time period?Historical estimates use this profile's current boundaries, held constant across periods; they do not reflect the boundaries that were in effect at the time. Comparing
Values as
Show as
Add to every table
Showing Chart vs. Los Angeles ± Margin of error

Basic Demographics

Race & Ethnicity

Category District 8
Hispanic 59.9% ±1.5 pp151,047 ±3,730
White 3.4% ±0.4 pp8,575 ±948
Black 30.2% ±1.2 pp76,284 ±3,022
Asian 2.3% ±0.3 pp5,756 ±715
Other or Multi-racial 4.2% ±0.6 pp10,683 ±1,403
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Hispanic 59.9%±1.5 pp151,047±3,730 47.2%±0.2 pp1,820,397±8,107 ▲ +12.7% 7/15
White 3.4%±0.4 pp8,575±948 28.1%±0.2 pp1,082,393±7,330 ▼ -24.7% 14/15
Black 30.2%±1.2 pp76,284±3,022 8.1%±0.1 pp311,633±4,801 ▲ +22.2% 1/15
Asian 2.3%±0.3 pp5,756±715 11.9%±0.1 pp460,422±5,784 ▼ -9.7% 15/15
Other or Multi-racial 4.2%±0.6 pp10,683±1,403 4.7%±0.1 pp182,418±4,965 ▼ -0.5% 9/15
Note: Race categories (White, Black, Asian, Other) refer to non-Hispanic individuals of that race. Hispanic or Latino is counted separately and may be of any race.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Hispanic 55.0% ±1.1 pp134,878 ±2,716 57.3% ±1.2 pp150,804 ±3,041 59.9% ±1.5 pp151,047 ±3,730 ▲ +4.9 pp▲ +16,169▲ +2.5 pp▲ +243▲ +2.3 pp▲ +15,926
Los Angeles citywide 48.6% ±0.2 pp1,876,711 ±6,363 48.5% ±0.2 pp1,922,409 ±6,867 47.2% ±0.2 pp1,820,397 ±8,107 ▼ −1.4 pp▼ −56,314▼ −1.3 pp▼ −102,012▼ −0.1 pp▲ +45,698
White 1.8% ±0.2 pp4,490 ±582 2.7% ±0.3 pp7,076 ±682 3.4% ±0.4 pp8,575 ±948 ▲ +1.6 pp▲ +4,085▲ +0.7 pp▲ +1,499▲ +0.9 pp▲ +2,586
Los Angeles citywide 28.5% ±0.1 pp1,100,413 ±5,207 28.5% ±0.1 pp1,129,956 ±5,063 28.1% ±0.2 pp1,082,393 ±7,330 ▼ −0.4 pp▼ −18,020▼ −0.4 pp▼ −47,563– 0.0 pp▲ +29,543
Black 39.3% ±0.8 pp96,397 ±1,985 35.8% ±0.9 pp94,285 ±2,439 30.2% ±1.2 pp76,284 ±3,022 ▼ −9.1 pp▼ −20,113▼ −5.6 pp▼ −18,001▼ −3.5 pp▼ −2,112
Los Angeles citywide 8.9% ±0.1 pp341,960 ±4,238 8.6% ±0.1 pp341,750 ±4,634 8.1% ±0.1 pp311,633 ±4,801 ▼ −0.8 pp▼ −30,327▼ −0.5 pp▼ −30,117▼ −0.2 pp▼ −210
Asian 1.8% ±0.3 pp4,434 ±653 2.2% ±0.3 pp5,828 ±694 2.3% ±0.3 pp5,756 ±715 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +1,322▲ +0.1 pp▼ −72▲ +0.4 pp▲ +1,394
Los Angeles citywide 11.4% ±0.1 pp439,382 ±4,465 11.5% ±0.1 pp454,688 ±4,897 11.9% ±0.1 pp460,422 ±5,784 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +21,040▲ +0.5 pp▲ +5,734▲ +0.1 pp▲ +15,306
Other or Multi-racial 2.1% ±0.3 pp5,029 ±774 2.0% ±0.3 pp5,141 ±905 4.2% ±0.6 pp10,683 ±1,403 ▲ +2.2 pp▲ +5,654▲ +2.3 pp▲ +5,542▼ −0.1 pp▲ +112
Los Angeles citywide 2.7% ±0.1 pp103,744 ±3,093 3.0% ±0.1 pp118,133 ±3,478 4.7% ±0.1 pp182,418 ±4,965 ▲ +2.0 pp▲ +78,674▲ +1.8 pp▲ +64,285▲ +0.3 pp▲ +14,389

Age Distribution

Category District 8
Under 5 5.6% ±0.4 pp14,248 ±1,103
5-17 18.2% ±0.6 pp46,050 ±1,562
18-24 10.4% ±0.5 pp26,131 ±1,267
25-44 28.7% ±0.6 pp72,430 ±1,532
45-64 24.2% ±0.6 pp61,119 ±1,480
65-74 7.8% ±0.4 pp19,685 ±979
75-84 3.6% ±0.3 pp8,989 ±698
85+ 1.5% ±0.2 pp3,694 ±543
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Under 5 5.6%±0.4 pp14,248±1,103 5.0%±0.1 pp193,588±3,913 ▲ +0.6% 3/15
5-17 18.2%±0.6 pp46,050±1,562 14.1%±0.1 pp545,575±5,441 ▲ +4.1% 2/15
18-24 10.4%±0.5 pp26,131±1,267 9.5%±0.1 pp364,975±4,769 ▲ +0.9% 3/15
25-44 28.7%±0.6 pp72,430±1,532 32.7%±0.2 pp1,261,487±6,697 ▼ -4.0% 12/15
45-64 24.2%±0.6 pp61,119±1,480 24.4%±0.1 pp942,048±5,753 ▼ -0.2% 8/15
65-74 7.8%±0.4 pp19,685±979 8.4%±0.1 pp323,245±3,954 ▼ -0.6% 12/15
75-84 3.6%±0.3 pp8,989±698 4.0%±0.1 pp153,663±2,684 ▼ -0.4% 11/15
85+ 1.5%±0.2 pp3,694±543 1.9%±0.1 pp72,682±2,194 ▼ -0.4% 12/15
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Educational Attainment

Category District 8
No High School Diploma 31.2% ±1.0 pp51,722 ±1,712
High School Diploma or GED 25.7% ±1.1 pp42,574 ±1,900
Some College or Associate's Degree 25.8% ±0.9 pp42,801 ±1,510
Bachelor's Degree 11.9% ±0.7 pp19,740 ±1,117
Graduate Degree 5.4% ±0.5 pp9,032 ±802
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
No High School Diploma 31.2%±1.0 pp51,722±1,712 20.4%±0.2 pp560,441±5,874 ▲ +10.8% 4/15
High School Diploma or GED 25.7%±1.1 pp42,574±1,900 18.5%±0.2 pp509,870±5,865 ▲ +7.1% 2/15
Some College or Associate's Degree 25.8%±0.9 pp42,801±1,510 22.7%±0.2 pp624,064±6,021 ▲ +3.1% 5/15
Bachelor's Degree 11.9%±0.7 pp19,740±1,117 24.9%±0.2 pp684,319±5,942 ▼ -13.0% 14/15
Graduate Degree 5.4%±0.5 pp9,032±802 13.6%±0.2 pp374,431±4,556 ▼ -8.2% 13/15
Universe: Population 25 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Population

Category District 8
Total Population 252,346 ±5,822
Total Households 79,144 ±1,482
Population Density 15,741 ±363 people/sq mi
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 Average District Difference
Total Population 252,346 257,156 ▼ −4,810
Total Households 79,144 95,942 ▼ −16,798
Population Density 15,741 people/sq mi 10,569 people/sq mi ▲ +5,172
Note: These are American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates, not 2020 decennial Census counts. The ACS surveys a sample of households over five years, so its population estimate and margin of error can differ from the Census’s April 1, 2020 full count; population change since 2020 and geographic aggregation at split Census geographies can also contribute. Learn more in the methodology.
Compared against the average district rather than the citywide total, since population size is dominated by a handful of large districts. Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category 2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19 Difference Rank
Total Population 245,227 ±3,734 263,134 ±3,991 252,346 ±5,822 ▲ +7,119 ±6,916▼ −10,788 ±7,059▲ +17,907 ±5,465 ▼ −12,281▼ −1,283▼ −4,810 15/1512/1511/15
Average District 257,508 264,417 257,156 ▼ −352▼ −7,261▲ +6,909
Total Households 74,506 ±648 80,664 ±646 79,144 ±1,482 ▲ +4,638 ±1,617▼ −1,520 ±1,616▲ +6,158 ±915 ▼ −14,138▼ −11,585▼ −16,798 12/1512/1512/15
Average District 88,644 92,249 95,942 ▲ +7,298▲ +3,694▲ +3,604
Population Density (per sq mi) 15,297 ±233 16,414 ±249 15,741 ±363 ▲ +444▼ −673▲ +1,117 ▲ +4,661▲ +5,477▲ +5,172 5/154/154/15
Average District Density 10,636 10,937 10,569 ▼ −67▼ −368▲ +302

Household Size

Category District 8
Average Household Size 3.14±0.08
1-Person Households 25.8% ±1.2 pp20,426 ±949
2-Person Households 22.5% ±1.2 pp17,776 ±958
3-Person Households 17.5% ±1.0 pp13,823 ±807
4+ Person Households 34.3% ±1.3 pp27,118 ±1,037
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Average Household Size 3.14±0.08 2.61±0.02 ▲ +0.53 4/15
1-Person Households 25.8%±1.2 pp20,426±949 31.8%±0.3 pp458,302±3,959 ▼ -6.0% 9/15
2-Person Households 22.5%±1.2 pp17,776±958 29.2%±0.3 pp419,781±4,028 ▼ -6.7% 14/15
3-Person Households 17.5%±1.0 pp13,823±807 15.5%±0.2 pp222,553±3,314 ▲ +2.0% 4/15
4+ Person Households 34.3%±1.3 pp27,118±1,037 23.5%±0.3 pp338,461±4,045 ▲ +10.7% 4/15
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Marital Status

Category District 8
Never Married 52.0% ±1.0 pp105,729 ±1,989
Married 31.4% ±0.5 pp63,726 ±1,103
Separated 3.0% ±0.3 pp6,091 ±628
Divorced 8.2% ±0.5 pp16,695 ±971
Widowed 5.4% ±0.4 pp10,906 ±851
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Never Married 52.0%±1.0 pp105,729±1,989 46.8%±0.2 pp1,520,630±7,726 ▲ +5.2% 4/15
Married 31.4%±0.5 pp63,726±1,103 38.5%±0.2 pp1,249,312±6,703 ▼ -7.1% 14/15
Separated 3.0%±0.3 pp6,091±628 2.3%±0.1 pp75,298±2,109 ▲ +0.7% 2/15
Divorced 8.2%±0.5 pp16,695±971 8.0%±0.1 pp260,053±4,066 ▲ +0.2% 6/15
Widowed 5.4%±0.4 pp10,906±851 4.4%±0.1 pp143,800±3,312 ▲ +0.9% 2/15
Universe: Population 15 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Language Spoken at Home

Category District 8
Speak English Only 42.1% ±1.2 pp100,219 ±2,816
Spanish 54.2% ±1.4 pp128,934 ±3,392
Other Languages 3.7% ±0.4 pp8,905 ±1,023
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this district, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Speak English Only 42.1%±1.2 pp100,219±2,816 43.6%±0.3 pp1,595,910±12,698 ▼ -1.5% 7/15
Spanish 54.2%±1.4 pp128,934±3,392 39.3%±0.3 pp1,439,364±9,227 ▲ +14.9% 4/15
Other Languages 3.7%±0.4 pp8,905±1,023 1.0%±0.1 pp36,540±2,239 ▲ +2.7% 5/15
Note: The ‘Other Languages’ row includes named language groups with a prevalence below 1% in this district, as well as languages not separately enumerated by the Census Bureau. In historical views, the 1% test uses the most recent release and the same set of rows is shown for every period, so an earlier release may list a group below 1%. See the full list of language categories and what they include.
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

English Proficiency

Sub-rows show
Category District 8
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 70.1% ±0.8 pp70.1%±0.8 pp166,793 ±1,889
Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents age 5+) 29.9% ±0.9 pp29.9%±0.9 pp71,305 ±2,108
↳ Speaks English Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 13.6% ±0.7 pp45.4%±1.9 pp32,337 ±1,653
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 10.7% ±0.6 pp35.8%±1.6 pp25,537 ±1,388
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 5.6% ±0.5 pp18.8%±1.6 pp13,431 ±1,196
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Native English Speaker or Speaks English Very Well (of residents age 5+) 70.1%±0.8 pp70.1%±0.8 pp166,793±1,889 75.0%±0.4 pp75.0%±0.4 pp2,746,425±15,454 ▼ -4.9%▼ -4.9% 11/15
Combined Speaks English Less Than Very Well (of residents age 5+) 29.9%±0.9 pp29.9%±0.9 pp71,305±2,108 25.0%±0.3 pp25.0%±0.3 pp917,250±9,304 ▲ +4.9%▲ +4.9% 5/15
↳ Speaks English Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 13.6%±0.7 pp45.4%±1.9 pp32,337±1,653 11.4%±0.2 pp45.5%±0.4 pp417,261±5,774 ▲ +2.2%▼ -0.1% 4/1510/15
↳ Speaks English Not Well (of residents who speak English less than very well) 10.7%±0.6 pp35.8%±1.6 pp25,537±1,388 9.5%±0.2 pp37.9%±0.5 pp347,471±6,114 ▲ +1.2%▼ -2.1% 7/159/15
↳ Does Not Speak English (of residents who speak English less than very well) 5.6%±0.5 pp18.8%±1.6 pp13,431±1,196 4.2%±0.1 pp16.6%±0.4 pp152,518±4,020 ▲ +1.5%▲ +2.2% 4/154/15
Universe: Population 5 years and over · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Household Composition

Category District 8
Married-Couple Households 30.9% ±1.2 pp24,458 ±939
Unmarried-Couple Households 8.7% ±0.8 pp6,861 ±645
One-Person Households 25.8% ±1.4 pp20,426 ±1,118
Other Household Types 34.6% ±2.8 pp27,399 ±2,203
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Married-Couple Households 30.9%±1.2 pp24,458±939 37.0%±0.3 pp531,842±3,893 ▼ -6.1% 12/15
Unmarried-Couple Households 8.7%±0.8 pp6,861±645 8.8%±0.2 pp125,985±2,722 ▼ -0.1% 9/15
One-Person Households 25.8%±1.4 pp20,426±1,118 31.8%±0.3 pp458,302±4,544 ▼ -6.0% 9/15
Other Household Types 34.6%±2.8 pp27,399±2,203 22.4%±0.5 pp322,968±7,912 ▲ +12.2% 2/15
Note: “Other” includes single-parent households, adult roommates, and multi-generational households without a couple at the head.
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Children by Household Type

Category District 8
Children in Married-Couple Households 44.1% ±2.3 pp26,432 ±1,395
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 13.0% ±1.7 pp7,798 ±1,049
Children in Single-Mother Households 36.5% ±2.9 pp21,902 ±1,762
Children in Single-Father Households 6.4% ±1.2 pp3,847 ±699
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Children in Married-Couple Households 44.1%±2.3 pp26,432±1,395 60.7%±0.6 pp447,843±4,339 ▼ -16.7% 14/15
Children in Unmarried-Couple Households 13.0%±1.7 pp7,798±1,049 10.9%±0.5 pp80,543±3,499 ▲ +2.1% 5/15
Children in Single-Mother Households 36.5%±2.9 pp21,902±1,762 22.7%±0.7 pp167,403±4,794 ▲ +13.8% 1/15
Children in Single-Father Households 6.4%±1.2 pp3,847±699 5.6%±0.3 pp41,515±2,120 ▲ +0.8% 5/15
Note: Children under 18 in households, excluding householders, spouses, and unmarried partners. Household types are classified by the “householder” — typically the person who owns or rents the home. In some circumstances, someone classified as a single parent could have another familial relationship to the child — for instance, a grandmother raising a child alone. Similarly, it is possible that a grandmother is the householder and counted as a single-parent household, while married or cohabiting parents also reside in the home and primarily raise the children.
Universe: Children under 18 years in households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Veteran Status

Sub-rows show
Category District 8
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 2.4% ±0.3 pp2.4%±0.3 pp4,583 ±537
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 21.6% ±6.5 pp0.5%±0.2 pp990 ±296
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 12.8% ±5.0 pp0.3%±0.1 pp586 ±230
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 28.3% ±6.4 pp0.7%±0.2 pp1,296 ±291
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 3.8% ±4.3 pp0.1%±0.1 pp176 ±198
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 33.5% ±8.3 pp0.8%±0.2 pp1,536 ±381
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Veteran (of civilian adults 18+) 2.4%±0.3 pp2.4%±0.3 pp4,583±537 2.2%±0.1 pp2.2%±0.1 pp67,714±2,153 ▲ +0.2%▲ +0.2% 7/15
↳ Post-9/11 Gulf War Era (of veterans) 21.6%±6.5 pp0.5%±0.2 pp990±296 25.0%±1.1 pp0.5%±0.0 pp16,948±757 ▼ -3.4%0% 14/1512/15
↳ Pre-9/11 Gulf War Era Only (of veterans) 12.8%±5.0 pp0.3%±0.1 pp586±230 12.9%±1.0 pp0.3%±0.0 pp8,738±667 ▼ -0.1%0% 7/156/15
↳ Vietnam Era (of veterans) 28.3%±6.4 pp0.7%±0.2 pp1,296±291 29.1%±1.1 pp0.6%±0.0 pp19,723±754 ▼ -0.9%0% 6/156/15
↳ Korean War (of veterans) 3.8%±4.3 pp0.1%±0.1 pp176±198 5.9%±0.8 pp0.1%±0.0 pp4,026±537 ▼ -2.1%0% 11/159/15
↳ Other / Peacetime Service (of veterans) 33.5%±8.3 pp0.8%±0.2 pp1,536±381 27.0%±1.8 pp0.6%±0.0 pp18,279±1,202 ▲ +6.5%▲ +0.2% 3/151/15
Universe: Civilian population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Immigration

Place of Birth and Citizenship

Sub-rows show
Category District 8
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 67.6% ±0.9 pp67.6%±0.9 pp170,668 ±2,316
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 32.4% ±0.9 pp32.4%±0.9 pp81,678 ±2,383
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 11.6% ±0.5 pp35.9%±1.3 pp29,343 ±1,351
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 20.7% ±0.9 pp64.1%±2.2 pp52,335 ±2,328
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
U.S.-Born Residents (of all residents) 67.6%±0.9 pp67.6%±0.9 pp170,668±2,316 64.3%±0.3 pp64.3%±0.3 pp2,479,853±10,798 ▲ +3.3%▲ +3.3% 5/15
Foreign-Born Residents (of all residents) 32.4%±0.9 pp32.4%±0.9 pp81,678±2,383 35.7%±0.3 pp35.7%±0.3 pp1,377,410±11,170 ▼ -3.3%▼ -3.3% 11/15
↳ Foreign-Born Naturalized Citizens (of foreign-born residents) 11.6%±0.5 pp35.9%±1.3 pp29,343±1,351 18.0%±0.2 pp50.4%±0.3 pp693,647±6,987 ▼ -6.4%▼ -14.4% 14/1514/15
↳ Foreign-Born Noncitizens (of foreign-born residents) 20.7%±0.9 pp64.1%±2.2 pp52,335±2,328 17.7%±0.2 pp49.6%±0.5 pp683,763±8,715 ▲ +3.0%▲ +14.4% 5/152/15
Note: A small share of people born abroad to U.S. parents are counted as U.S.-born.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Country of Birth

Rows show
Category District 8
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 12.2%±0.8 pp37.6%±1.8 pp30,666±1,898
Born in El Salvador (of foreign-born residents) 8.4%±0.6 pp26.0%±1.7 pp21,200±1,568
Born in Guatemala (of foreign-born residents) 5.0%±0.5 pp15.3%±1.5 pp12,507±1,324
Born in Belize (of foreign-born residents) 1.4%±0.3 pp4.3%±1.0 pp3,513±821
Born in Honduras (of foreign-born residents) 1.1%±0.3 pp3.5%±0.9 pp2,822±759
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 4.2%12.9%10,502
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 Los Angeles Difference Rank
Born in Mexico (of foreign-born residents) 12.2% ±0.8 pp37.6%±1.8 pp30,666 11.0% ±0.2 pp30.8%424,738 ▲ +1.1%▲ +6.7% 7/155/15
Born in El Salvador (of foreign-born residents) 8.4% ±0.6 pp26.0%±1.7 pp21,200 4.1% ±0.1 pp11.6%160,004 ▲ +4.3%▲ +14.3% 2/151/15
Born in Guatemala (of foreign-born residents) 5.0% ±0.5 pp15.3%±1.5 pp12,507 3.1% ±0.1 pp8.7%119,892 ▲ +1.9%▲ +6.6% 4/153/15
Born in Belize (of foreign-born residents) 1.4% ±0.3 pp4.3%±1.0 pp3,513 0.2% ±0.0 pp0.5%7,441 ▲ +1.2%▲ +3.8% 1/151/15
Born in Honduras (of foreign-born residents) 1.1% ±0.3 pp3.5%±0.9 pp2,822 0.5% ±0.0 pp1.4%19,851 ▲ +0.6%▲ +2.0% 2/152/15
Born in other countries (of foreign-born residents) 4.2%12.9%10,502 ——
Note: Individual countries are shown when they account for at least 1% of the area’s total population. Views of earlier releases apply the same test to every release, so a country that reaches 1% in any of them is shown in all of them.
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rows show

Foreign-Born Residents by Year of U.S. Entry

Rows show
Category District 8
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 6.7% ±0.6 pp20.6%±1.9 pp16,788 ±1,603
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 6.8% ±0.5 pp21.0%±1.4 pp17,106 ±1,257
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 7.4% ±0.5 pp22.9%±1.2 pp18,702 ±1,146
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 11.5% ±0.5 pp35.6%±1.2 pp29,050 ±1,295
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later (of foreign-born residents) 6.7%±0.6 pp20.6%±1.9 pp16,788±1,603 8.0%±0.2 pp376.7%±13.6 pp307,579±6,156 ▼ -1.3%▼ -356.2% 11/1511/15
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 (of foreign-born residents) 6.8%±0.5 pp21.0%±1.4 pp17,106±1,257 7.2%±0.1 pp341.7%±12.0 pp278,968±4,987 ▼ -0.5%▼ -320.7% 9/155/15
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 (of foreign-born residents) 7.4%±0.5 pp22.9%±1.2 pp18,702±1,146 7.6%±0.1 pp359.6%±12.3 pp293,558±4,815 ▼ -0.2%▼ -336.6% 10/154/15
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 (of foreign-born residents) 11.5%±0.5 pp35.6%±1.2 pp29,050±1,295 12.9%±0.1 pp609.1%±19.6 pp497,305±5,768 ▼ -1.4%▼ -573.5% 12/156/15
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Entered the U.S. in 2010 or Later 1.3% ±0.2 pp3,122 ±521 3.8% ±0.4 pp9,893 ±977 6.7% ±0.6 pp16,788 ±1,603 ▲ +5.4 pp▲ +13,666▲ +2.9 pp▲ +6,895▲ +2.5 pp▲ +6,771
Los Angeles citywide 1.7% ±0.1 pp64,948 ±2,271 5.1% ±0.1 pp202,940 ±3,998 8.0% ±0.2 pp307,579 ±6,179 ▲ +6.3 pp▲ +242,631▲ +2.9 pp▲ +104,639▲ +3.4 pp▲ +137,992
Entered the U.S. From 2000 to 2009 8.6% ±0.6 pp21,054 ±1,422 7.6% ±0.5 pp20,052 ±1,235 6.8% ±0.5 pp17,106 ±1,257 ▼ −1.8 pp▼ −3,948▼ −0.9 pp▼ −2,946▼ −1.0 pp▼ −1,002
Los Angeles citywide 10.0% ±0.2 pp386,575 ±5,794 8.5% ±0.1 pp335,409 ±4,817 7.2% ±0.1 pp278,968 ±5,010 ▼ −2.8 pp▼ −107,607▼ −1.2 pp▼ −56,441▼ −1.6 pp▼ −51,166
Entered the U.S. From 1990 to 1999 8.4% ±0.5 pp20,599 ±1,163 7.7% ±0.4 pp20,162 ±1,125 7.4% ±0.5 pp18,702 ±1,146 ▼ −1.0 pp▼ −1,897▼ −0.3 pp▼ −1,460▼ −0.8 pp▼ −437
Los Angeles citywide 9.9% ±0.1 pp381,773 ±4,974 8.5% ±0.1 pp338,094 ±4,761 7.6% ±0.1 pp293,558 ±4,841 ▼ −2.3 pp▼ −88,215▼ −0.9 pp▼ −44,536▼ −1.4 pp▼ −43,679
Entered the U.S. Before 1990 14.4% ±0.6 pp35,292 ±1,355 13.5% ±0.5 pp35,356 ±1,214 11.5% ±0.5 pp29,050 ±1,295 ▼ −2.9 pp▼ −6,242▼ −1.9 pp▼ −6,306▼ −1.0 pp▲ +64
Los Angeles citywide 17.0% ±0.2 pp655,695 ±5,798 14.8% ±0.1 pp585,903 ±4,838 12.9% ±0.2 pp497,305 ±5,831 ▼ −4.1 pp▼ −158,390▼ −1.9 pp▼ −88,598▼ −2.2 pp▼ −69,792
Rows show

Household Income & Poverty

Household Income

Category District 8
Average Household Income $81,726±$2,138
Per Capita Income $26,746±$603
10th Percentile Household Income $10,741±$560
25th Percentile Household Income $25,537±$1,487
Median Household Income $59,091±$2,301
75th Percentile Household Income $110,600±$3,440
90th Percentile Household Income $183,105±$4,921
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $81,726±$2,138 $125,130±$1,000 ▼ −$43,403 14/15
Per Capita Income $26,746±$603 $47,685±$375 ▼ −$20,940 14/15
10th Percentile Household Income $10,741±$560 $14,186±$216 ▼ −$3,445 15/15
25th Percentile Household Income $25,537±$1,487 $37,123±$496 ▼ −$11,586 14/15
Median Household Income $59,091±$2,301 $81,939±$742 ▼ −$22,848 13/15
75th Percentile Household Income $110,600±$3,440 $154,703±$1,370 ▼ −$44,103 13/15
90th Percentile Household Income $183,105±$4,921 Over $200,000 ▼ −$16,895+ 14/15
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s household income brackets. If a percentile of household income is above $200,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $200,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $265,012 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $245,398 for 2015–19.
Universe: Households for household-income measures; total population for per capita income (including people living in group quarters) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $58,975 ±1,188 $74,418 ±1,851 $81,726 ±2,138 ▲ +$22,751▲ +$7,309▲ +$15,442
Los Angeles citywide $103,745 ±722 $118,302 ±915 $125,130 ±1,000 ▲ +$21,385▲ +$6,828▲ +$14,557
Average Household Income (nominal dollars) $44,508 ±897 $60,651 ±1,508 $81,726 ±2,138 ▲ +$37,219▲ +$21,076▲ +$16,143
Los Angeles citywide $78,294 ±545 $96,416 ±746 $125,130 ±1,000 ▲ +$46,835▲ +$28,714▲ +$18,122
Per Capita Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $19,467 ±316 $24,841 ±551 $26,746 ±603 ▲ +$7,278▲ +$1,905▲ +$5,373
Los Angeles citywide $37,526 ±267 $43,265 ±333 $47,685 ±375 ▲ +$10,159▲ +$4,420▲ +$5,739
Per Capita Income (nominal dollars) $14,692 ±238 $20,245 ±449 $26,746 ±603 ▲ +$12,054▲ +$6,500▲ +$5,554
Los Angeles citywide $28,320 ±202 $35,261 ±271 $47,685 ±375 ▲ +$19,365▲ +$12,424▲ +$6,941
10th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $10,797 ±639 $11,703 ±706 $10,741 ±560 ▼ −$56▼ −$962▲ +$907
Los Angeles citywide $15,033 ±149 $15,850 ±169 $14,186 ±216 ▼ −$847▼ −$1,664▲ +$817
10th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $8,148 ±482 $9,538 ±575 $10,741 ±560 ▲ +$2,593▲ +$1,203▲ +$1,390
Los Angeles citywide $11,345 ±113 $12,918 ±138 $14,186 ±216 ▲ +$2,841▲ +$1,268▲ +$1,573
25th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $20,534 ±711 $23,323 ±1,052 $25,537 ±1,487 ▲ +$5,004▲ +$2,214▲ +$2,789
Los Angeles citywide $30,727 ±279 $35,350 ±357 $37,123 ±496 ▲ +$6,396▲ +$1,773▲ +$4,623
25th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $15,496 ±537 $19,008 ±858 $25,537 ±1,487 ▲ +$10,041▲ +$6,529▲ +$3,512
Los Angeles citywide $23,189 ±211 $28,810 ±291 $37,123 ±496 ▲ +$13,934▲ +$8,313▲ +$5,621
Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $42,483 ±1,172 $52,801 ±1,642 $59,091 ±2,301 ▲ +$16,607▲ +$6,290▲ +$10,318
Los Angeles citywide $65,832 ±458 $76,248 ±555 $81,939 ±742 ▲ +$16,107▲ +$5,691▲ +$10,416
Median Household Income (nominal dollars) $32,061 ±884 $43,033 ±1,338 $59,091 ±2,301 ▲ +$27,029▲ +$16,058▲ +$10,972
Los Angeles citywide $49,682 ±346 $62,142 ±452 $81,939 ±742 ▲ +$32,257▲ +$19,797▲ +$12,460
75th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $80,145 ±2,171 $103,118 ±2,641 $110,600 ±3,440 ▲ +$30,455▲ +$7,482▲ +$22,973
Los Angeles citywide $127,020 ±723 $145,116 ±805 $154,703 ±1,370 ▲ +$27,684▲ +$9,587▲ +$18,097
75th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $60,484 ±1,639 $84,041 ±2,152 $110,600 ±3,440 ▲ +$50,116▲ +$26,559▲ +$23,557
Los Angeles citywide $95,860 ±545 $118,270 ±656 $154,703 ±1,370 ▲ +$58,844▲ +$36,433▲ +$22,410
90th Percentile Household Income (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $128,160 ±2,515 $158,999 ±4,668 $183,105 ±4,921 ▲ +$54,945▲ +$24,106▲ +$30,839
Los Angeles citywide $221,824 ±1,731 $245,212 ±895 — ——▲ +$23,388
90th Percentile Household Income (nominal dollars) $96,720 ±1,898 $129,584 ±3,805 $183,105 ±4,921 ▲ +$86,385▲ +$53,521▲ +$32,864
Los Angeles citywide $167,407 ±1,307 $199,848 ±730 — ——▲ +$32,441

Poverty Status

Category District 8
Below Poverty Line 23.0% ±1.3 pp57,999 ±3,164
Below 200% Poverty Line 45.2% ±1.8 pp113,971 ±4,451
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 11.5% ±0.9 pp29,066 ±2,226
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Below Poverty Line 23.0%±1.3 pp57,999±3,164 16.5%±0.3 pp638,207±11,569 ▲ +6.4% 3/15
Below 200% Poverty Line 45.2%±1.8 pp113,971±4,451 34.8%±0.4 pp1,343,960±17,101 ▲ +10.3% 3/15
Deep Poverty (Below 50%) 11.5%±0.9 pp29,066±2,226 8.0%±0.2 pp308,978±7,316 ▲ +3.5% 2/15
Note: Poverty status compares a family’s pre-tax cash income with the Census poverty threshold for its family size. For example, in 2024 the threshold for a one-person family was $15,060. See more details on how poverty is defined and measured.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Material Hardship

Material Hardship

Category District 8
Food Insecurity 36.3%70,437
Housing Insecurity 29.4%57,174
Transportation Barriers 17.6%34,293
Threatened Utility Shutoff 14.7%28,515
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Food Insecurity 36.3%70,437 23.6%700,942 ▲ +12.7% 2/15
Housing Insecurity 29.4%57,174 19.3%573,228 ▲ +10.1% 2/15
Transportation Barriers 17.6%34,293 11.8%350,471 ▲ +5.8% 2/15
Threatened Utility Shutoff 14.7%28,515 9.0%267,308 ▲ +5.7% 2/15
Note: Food insecurity means not having enough money to buy food in the past 12 months. Housing insecurity means worrying about losing housing in the past 12 months. Transportation barriers mean that lack of reliable transportation kept someone from medical appointments, meetings, work, or getting things needed for daily living in the past 12 months. Utility services threat means being threatened with utility service shutoff in the past 12 months.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Work & Employment

Employment Status, Ages 25–54

Category District 8
In Labor Force 76.2% ±1.1 pp78,614 ±1,099
↳ Employed 69.8% ±1.2 pp72,046 ±1,201
↳ Unemployed 6.3% ±0.6 pp6,543 ±668
↳ Unemployment Rate 8.3% ±0.8 pp—
Not in Labor Force 23.8% ±3.3 pp24,548 ±3,415
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
In Labor Force 76.2%±1.1 pp78,614±1,099 83.1%±0.2 pp1,458,393±3,957 ▼ -6.9% 15/15
↳ Employed 69.8%±1.2 pp72,046±1,201 76.8%±0.2 pp1,346,606±4,271 ▼ -6.9% 15/15
↳ Unemployed 6.3%±0.6 pp6,543±668 6.3%±0.2 pp110,332±3,060 ▲ +0.1% 6/15
↳ Unemployment Rate 8.3%±0.8 pp— 7.6%±0.2 pp132,846±3,656 ▲ +0.8% 5/15
Not in Labor Force 23.8%±3.3 pp24,548±3,415 16.9%±0.8 pp295,844±14,155 ▲ +6.9% 1/15
Note: “In the Labor Force” counts people who are either employed or unemployed but actively looking for work. “Not in the Labor Force” counts those who are neither working nor looking for work; common reasons include disability, caregiving responsibilities, schooling, and early retirement. The unemployment rate is the share of the labor force (not of all adults) who are looking for work but do not currently have a job.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population 25 to 54 years old · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Occupation

Category District 8
Management, Business, Science & Arts 27.1% ±1.4 pp29,012 ±1,498
↳ Management Occupations 7.7% ±0.8 pp8,246 ±819
↳ Business & Financial Operations 3.5% ±0.5 pp3,790 ±519
↳ Computer & Mathematical 1.3% ±0.3 pp1,414 ±313
↳ Architecture & Engineering 0.7% ±0.2 pp762 ±241
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 0.7% ±0.3 pp765 ±326
↳ Community & Social Service 1.9% ±0.4 pp2,071 ±406
↳ Legal Occupations 1.0% ±0.3 pp1,070 ±330
↳ Education, Training & Library 5.0% ±0.6 pp5,326 ±674
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 2.3% ±0.4 pp2,424 ±396
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 1.2% ±0.3 pp1,254 ±292
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 1.8% ±0.4 pp1,889 ±410
Service 27.0% ±1.3 pp28,932 ±1,366
↳ Healthcare Support 6.3% ±0.6 pp6,769 ±674
↳ Protective Service 3.1% ±0.4 pp3,348 ±482
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 6.8% ±0.7 pp7,299 ±756
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 7.7% ±0.7 pp8,292 ±700
↳ Personal Care & Service 3.0% ±0.4 pp3,224 ±436
Sales & Office 19.2% ±1.2 pp20,536 ±1,236
↳ Sales & Related 8.3% ±0.7 pp8,845 ±776
↳ Office & Administrative Support 10.9% ±0.9 pp11,690 ±949
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 9.7% ±0.8 pp10,443 ±840
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.4% ±0.2 pp379 ±216
↳ Construction & Extraction 6.8% ±0.7 pp7,295 ±732
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 2.6% ±0.4 pp2,769 ±415
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 17.0% ±1.1 pp18,259 ±1,201
↳ Production Occupations 6.0% ±0.6 pp6,439 ±668
↳ Transportation Occupations 5.8% ±0.6 pp6,187 ±694
↳ Material Moving Occupations 5.3% ±0.7 pp5,632 ±714
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Management, Business, Science & Arts 27.1%±1.4 pp29,012±1,498 43.8%±0.3 pp856,718±5,665 ▼ -16.8% 13/15
↳ Management Occupations 7.7%±0.8 pp8,246±819 11.0%±0.2 pp215,767±3,237 ▼ -3.3% 12/15
↳ Business & Financial Operations 3.5%±0.5 pp3,790±519 6.1%±0.1 pp119,779±2,742 ▼ -2.6% 12/15
↳ Computer & Mathematical 1.3%±0.3 pp1,414±313 2.8%±0.1 pp55,551±1,839 ▼ -1.5% 14/15
↳ Architecture & Engineering 0.7%±0.2 pp762±241 1.6%±0.1 pp31,959±1,411 ▼ -0.9% 14/15
↳ Life, Physical & Social Science 0.7%±0.3 pp765±326 1.1%±0.1 pp21,801±1,140 ▼ -0.4% 11/15
↳ Community & Social Service 1.9%±0.4 pp2,071±406 1.8%±0.1 pp34,335±1,497 ▲ +0.2% 4/15
↳ Legal Occupations 1.0%±0.3 pp1,070±330 2.1%±0.1 pp40,323±1,500 ▼ -1.1% 11/15
↳ Education, Training & Library 5.0%±0.6 pp5,326±674 5.1%±0.1 pp100,542±2,462 ▼ -0.2% 6/15
↳ Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 2.3%±0.4 pp2,424±396 7.4%±0.2 pp144,867±2,938 ▼ -5.2% 13/15
↳ Health Diagnosing & Treating Practitioners 1.2%±0.3 pp1,254±292 3.3%±0.1 pp64,007±2,042 ▼ -2.1% 14/15
↳ Health Technologists & Technicians 1.8%±0.4 pp1,889±410 1.4%±0.1 pp27,787±1,316 ▲ +0.3% 4/15
Service 27.0%±1.3 pp28,932±1,366 19.1%±0.2 pp372,654±4,348 ▲ +7.9% 1/15
↳ Healthcare Support 6.3%±0.6 pp6,769±674 4.1%±0.1 pp80,369±2,120 ▲ +2.2% 1/15
↳ Protective Service 3.1%±0.4 pp3,348±482 1.4%±0.1 pp28,096±1,344 ▲ +1.7% 1/15
↳ Food Preparation & Serving 6.8%±0.7 pp7,299±756 6.0%±0.1 pp117,268±2,832 ▲ +0.8% 5/15
↳ Building & Grounds Cleaning & Maintenance 7.7%±0.7 pp8,292±700 4.6%±0.1 pp89,319±2,441 ▲ +3.2% 3/15
↳ Personal Care & Service 3.0%±0.4 pp3,224±436 2.9%±0.1 pp57,602±2,122 ▲ +0.1% 6/15
Sales & Office 19.2%±1.2 pp20,536±1,236 18.5%±0.2 pp362,312±4,169 ▲ +0.6% 7/15
↳ Sales & Related 8.3%±0.7 pp8,845±776 8.7%±0.2 pp170,605±3,233 ▼ -0.5% 12/15
↳ Office & Administrative Support 10.9%±0.9 pp11,690±949 9.8%±0.2 pp191,707±3,358 ▲ +1.1% 4/15
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance 9.7%±0.8 pp10,443±840 7.5%±0.1 pp146,574±2,638 ▲ +2.2% 5/15
↳ Farming, Fishing & Forestry 0.4%±0.2 pp379±216 0.3%±0.0 pp5,780±677 ▲ +0.1% 6/15
↳ Construction & Extraction 6.8%±0.7 pp7,295±732 5.2%±0.1 pp101,165±2,372 ▲ +1.6% 5/15
↳ Installation, Maintenance & Repair 2.6%±0.4 pp2,769±415 2.0%±0.1 pp39,629±1,434 ▲ +0.6% 5/15
Production, Transportation & Material Moving 17.0%±1.1 pp18,259±1,201 11.0%±0.2 pp215,668±3,737 ▲ +6.0% 3/15
↳ Production Occupations 6.0%±0.6 pp6,439±668 4.4%±0.1 pp85,463±2,595 ▲ +1.6% 4/15
↳ Transportation Occupations 5.8%±0.6 pp6,187±694 3.3%±0.1 pp64,837±2,015 ▲ +2.5% 1/15
↳ Material Moving Occupations 5.3%±0.7 pp5,632±714 3.3%±0.1 pp65,368±2,325 ▲ +1.9% 3/15
Note: Occupation categories follow the Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. See the full listing of occupations in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Industry of Employment

Category District 8
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.5% ±0.2 pp555 ±260
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.5% ±0.2 pp539 ±260
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0% ±0.2 pp16 ±175
Construction 7.8% ±0.7 pp8,352 ±758
Manufacturing 7.1% ±0.7 pp7,616 ±728
Wholesale Trade 3.0% ±0.5 pp3,187 ±536
Retail Trade 10.1% ±0.7 pp10,785 ±795
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 9.0% ±0.8 pp9,669 ±872
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 8.7% ±0.8 pp9,310 ±866
↳ Utilities 0.3% ±0.2 pp359 ±209
Information 2.6% ±0.4 pp2,756 ±458
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 3.8% ±0.5 pp4,060 ±509
↳ Finance & Insurance 2.3% ±0.4 pp2,512 ±395
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.4% ±0.3 pp1,549 ±356
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 12.6% ±0.8 pp13,469 ±878
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 4.4% ±0.5 pp4,704 ±585
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0% ±0.2 pp21 ±176
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 8.2% ±0.7 pp8,744 ±711
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 22.6% ±1.1 pp24,222 ±1,144
↳ Educational Services 8.2% ±0.7 pp8,760 ±701
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 14.4% ±1.0 pp15,462 ±1,028
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 11.1% ±0.8 pp11,904 ±849
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 2.1% ±0.4 pp2,266 ±382
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 9.0% ±0.7 pp9,638 ±785
Other Services 6.0% ±0.6 pp6,444 ±610
Public Administration 3.9% ±0.5 pp4,163 ±505
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.5%±0.2 pp555±260 0.4%±0.0 pp— ▲ +0.1% 4/15
↳ Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 0.5%±0.2 pp539±260 0.4%±0.0 pp— ▲ +0.1% 4/15
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%±0.2 pp16±175 0.0%±0.0 pp— 0% 10/15
Construction 7.8%±0.7 pp8,352±758 6.5%±0.1 pp— ▲ +1.3% 5/15
Manufacturing 7.1%±0.7 pp7,616±728 6.8%±0.2 pp— ▲ +0.3% 8/15
Wholesale Trade 3.0%±0.5 pp3,187±536 2.3%±0.1 pp— ▲ +0.6% 4/15
Retail Trade 10.1%±0.7 pp10,785±795 9.3%±0.2 pp— ▲ +0.7% 5/15
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 9.0%±0.8 pp9,669±872 5.3%±0.1 pp— ▲ +3.7% 2/15
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 8.7%±0.8 pp9,310±866 4.9%±0.1 pp— ▲ +3.7% 2/15
↳ Utilities 0.3%±0.2 pp359±209 0.4%±0.0 pp— 0% 9/15
Information 2.6%±0.4 pp2,756±458 6.4%±0.2 pp— ▼ -3.9% 12/15
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 3.8%±0.5 pp4,060±509 5.8%±0.1 pp— ▼ -2.0% 14/15
↳ Finance & Insurance 2.3%±0.4 pp2,512±395 3.5%±0.1 pp— ▼ -1.1% 13/15
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 1.4%±0.3 pp1,549±356 2.3%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.9% 14/15
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 12.6%±0.8 pp13,469±878 15.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -3.1% 12/15
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 4.4%±0.5 pp4,704±585 10.3%±0.2 pp— ▼ -5.9% 14/15
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%±0.2 pp21±176 0.1%±0.0 pp— ▼ -0.1% 13/15
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 8.2%±0.7 pp8,744±711 5.2%±0.1 pp— ▲ +3.0% 2/15
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 22.6%±1.1 pp24,222±1,144 20.8%±0.2 pp— ▲ +1.8% 5/15
↳ Educational Services 8.2%±0.7 pp8,760±701 8.1%±0.2 pp— 0% 5/15
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 14.4%±1.0 pp15,462±1,028 12.6%±0.2 pp— ▲ +1.8% 5/15
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 11.1%±0.8 pp11,904±849 12.0%±0.2 pp— ▼ -0.9% 9/15
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 2.1%±0.4 pp2,266±382 4.1%±0.1 pp— ▼ -2.0% 13/15
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 9.0%±0.7 pp9,638±785 7.9%±0.2 pp— ▲ +1.1% 5/15
Other Services 6.0%±0.6 pp6,444±610 6.0%±0.1 pp— 0% 8/15
Public Administration 3.9%±0.5 pp4,163±505 2.7%±0.1 pp— ▲ +1.2% 3/15
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Class of Worker

Category District 8
Private Company Employee 65.8% ±1.0 pp70,558 ±1,030
Self-Employed 12.2% ±0.9 pp13,120 ±911
Nonprofit 7.7% ±0.7 pp8,211 ±785
Government 14.1% ±0.9 pp15,103 ±936
Unpaid Family Worker 0.2% ±0.2 pp190 ±191
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Private Company Employee 65.8%±1.0 pp70,558±1,030 66.9%±0.3 pp1,307,510±5,830 ▼ -1.1% 6/15
Self-Employed 12.2%±0.9 pp13,120±911 16.2%±0.2 pp316,694±4,405 ▼ -4.0% 14/15
Nonprofit 7.7%±0.7 pp8,211±785 8.0%±0.2 pp155,457±3,565 ▼ -0.3% 10/15
Government 14.1%±0.9 pp15,103±936 10.6%±0.2 pp207,304±3,359 ▲ +3.5% 1/15
Unpaid Family Worker 0.2%±0.2 pp190±191 0.3%±0.0 pp5,059±497 ▼ -0.1% 13/15
Note: Unpaid family workers are people who worked without pay in a family member’s business, farm, or professional practice. This category does not include other roles such as stay at home parents.
Universe: Civilian employed population 16 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Full-Time vs. Part-Time Work

Category District 8
Full-Time, Year-Round 60.8% ±1.2 pp72,380 ±1,430
Part-Time or Part-Year 39.2% ±1.2 pp46,708 ±1,415
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Full-Time, Year-Round 60.8%±1.2 pp72,380±1,430 61.7%±0.2 pp1,328,967±3,929 ▼ -0.9% 11/15
Part-Time or Part-Year 39.2%±1.2 pp46,708±1,415 38.3%±0.3 pp826,047±5,840 ▲ +0.9% 5/15
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Shares are calculated among workers who reported earnings; people with no earnings are excluded.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers

Category District 8
Average FT Earnings $59,898±$1,281
10th Percentile FT Earnings $21,998±$1,351
25th Percentile FT Earnings $32,630±$669
Median FT Earnings $46,104±$977
75th Percentile FT Earnings $70,963±$2,044
90th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Average FT Earnings $59,898±$1,281 $93,330±$761 ▼ −$33,432 14/15
10th Percentile FT Earnings $21,998±$1,351 $25,056±$255 ▼ −$3,058 13/15
25th Percentile FT Earnings $32,630±$669 $37,825±$214 ▼ −$5,195 13/15
Median FT Earnings $46,104±$977 $61,975±$422 ▼ −$15,872 14/15
75th Percentile FT Earnings $70,963±$2,044 Over $100,000 ▼ −$29,037+ 14/15
90th Percentile FT Earnings Over $100,000 Over $100,000 — 1/15
Note: ‘Full-time, year-round’ means usually working 35 or more hours per week for 50 or more weeks in the past 12 months. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Full-time, year-round workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $47,854 ±1,005 $54,235 ±1,139 $59,898 ±1,281 ▲ +$12,045▲ +$5,663▲ +$6,381
Los Angeles citywide $78,876 ±537 $84,242 ±564 $93,330 ±761 ▲ +$14,455▲ +$9,088▲ +$5,367
Average FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $36,114 ±758 $44,201 ±929 $59,898 ±1,281 ▲ +$23,784▲ +$15,697▲ +$8,087
Los Angeles citywide $59,526 ±405 $68,658 ±460 $93,330 ±761 ▲ +$33,804▲ +$24,673▲ +$9,131
10th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $18,025 ±502 $19,976 ±536 $21,998 ±1,351 ▲ +$3,974▲ +$2,022▲ +$1,951
Los Angeles citywide $20,202 ±88 $21,993 ±185 $25,056 ±255 ▲ +$4,854▲ +$3,063▲ +$1,791
10th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $13,603 ±379 $16,280 ±437 $21,998 ±1,351 ▲ +$8,395▲ +$5,718▲ +$2,678
Los Angeles citywide $15,246 ±66 $17,924 ±151 $25,056 ±255 ▲ +$9,810▲ +$7,132▲ +$2,678
25th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $24,025 ±672 $28,011 ±548 $32,630 ±669 ▲ +$8,605▲ +$4,619▲ +$3,986
Los Angeles citywide $29,363 ±173 $32,975 ±184 $37,825 ±214 ▲ +$8,461▲ +$4,850▲ +$3,611
25th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $18,131 ±507 $22,829 ±446 $32,630 ±669 ▲ +$14,499▲ +$9,801▲ +$4,697
Los Angeles citywide $22,160 ±131 $26,874 ±150 $37,825 ±214 ▲ +$15,665▲ +$10,950▲ +$4,714
Median FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $38,088 ±737 $41,642 ±669 $46,104 ±977 ▲ +$8,016▲ +$4,462▲ +$3,555
Los Angeles citywide $51,909 ±336 $54,226 ±279 $61,975 ±422 ▲ +$10,067▲ +$7,750▲ +$2,317
Median FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $28,744 ±557 $33,938 ±545 $46,104 ±977 ▲ +$17,360▲ +$12,165▲ +$5,194
Los Angeles citywide $39,175 ±254 $44,194 ±227 $61,975 ±422 ▲ +$22,801▲ +$17,781▲ +$5,019
75th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $58,191 ±1,102 $63,975 ±1,147 $70,963 ±2,044 ▲ +$12,772▲ +$6,988▲ +$5,784
Los Angeles citywide $91,403 ±620 $98,002 ±683 — ——▲ +$6,599
75th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $43,916 ±832 $52,140 ±935 $70,963 ±2,044 ▲ +$27,047▲ +$18,823▲ +$8,224
Los Angeles citywide $68,981 ±468 $79,872 ±557 — ——▲ +$10,891
90th Percentile FT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $87,592 ±3,122 $101,123 ±3,613 — ——▲ +$13,530
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile FT Earnings (nominal dollars) $66,105 ±2,356 $82,415 ±2,945 — ——▲ +$16,311
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Earnings of Part-Time or Part-Year Workers

Category District 8
Average PT Earnings $25,396±$1,348
10th Percentile PT Earnings $2,469±$298
25th Percentile PT Earnings $6,998±$494
Median PT Earnings $17,755±$834
75th Percentile PT Earnings $31,242±$1,325
90th Percentile PT Earnings $50,157±$2,999
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Average PT Earnings $25,396±$1,348 $36,543±$574 ▼ −$11,146 14/15
10th Percentile PT Earnings $2,469±$298 $2,785±$92 ▼ −$316 13/15
25th Percentile PT Earnings $6,998±$494 $8,451±$190 ▼ −$1,453 13/15
Median PT Earnings $17,755±$834 $20,275±$216 ▼ −$2,520 13/15
75th Percentile PT Earnings $31,242±$1,325 $39,236±$450 ▼ −$7,994 13/15
90th Percentile PT Earnings $50,157±$2,999 $80,378±$1,643 ▼ −$30,221 14/15
Note: ‘Part-time or part-year’ includes everyone who did not work full-time, year-round—those who usually worked fewer than 35 hours per week or fewer than 50 weeks during the year. Weeks with paid vacation or paid sick leave count as weeks worked. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings (part-time or part-year) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $19,521 ±654 $22,219 ±1,444 $25,396 ±1,348 ▲ +$5,875▲ +$3,177▲ +$2,698
Los Angeles citywide $30,652 ±490 $34,166 ±509 $36,543 ±574 ▲ +$5,890▲ +$2,377▲ +$3,513
Average PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $14,732 ±494 $18,109 ±1,177 $25,396 ±1,348 ▲ +$10,664▲ +$7,288▲ +$3,376
Los Angeles citywide $23,133 ±369 $27,845 ±415 $36,543 ±574 ▲ +$13,410▲ +$8,698▲ +$4,712
10th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,149 ±161 $2,572 ±234 $2,469 ±298 ▲ +$320▼ −$103▲ +$422
Los Angeles citywide $2,482 ±54 $2,712 ±58 $2,785 ±92 ▲ +$303▲ +$73▲ +$230
10th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $1,622 ±122 $2,096 ±191 $2,469 ±298 ▲ +$847▲ +$373▲ +$474
Los Angeles citywide $1,873 ±41 $2,210 ±47 $2,785 ±92 ▲ +$912▲ +$575▲ +$337
25th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $6,019 ±363 $7,052 ±397 $6,998 ±494 ▲ +$978▼ −$54▲ +$1,032
Los Angeles citywide $7,239 ±105 $8,054 ±111 $8,451 ±190 ▲ +$1,212▲ +$397▲ +$815
25th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $4,543 ±274 $5,747 ±324 $6,998 ±494 ▲ +$2,455▲ +$1,250▲ +$1,204
Los Angeles citywide $5,463 ±79 $6,564 ±91 $8,451 ±190 ▲ +$2,988▲ +$1,887▲ +$1,101
Median PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $13,811 ±488 $14,898 ±523 $17,755 ±834 ▲ +$3,944▲ +$2,857▲ +$1,087
Los Angeles citywide $16,086 ±129 $18,060 ±185 $20,275 ±216 ▲ +$4,189▲ +$2,215▲ +$1,973
Median PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $10,423 ±368 $12,142 ±426 $17,755 ±834 ▲ +$7,332▲ +$5,613▲ +$1,719
Los Angeles citywide $12,140 ±97 $14,719 ±151 $20,275 ±216 ▲ +$8,135▲ +$5,556▲ +$2,579
75th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $23,743 ±1,041 $26,088 ±837 $31,242 ±1,325 ▲ +$7,499▲ +$5,154▲ +$2,345
Los Angeles citywide $33,887 ±443 $36,465 ±382 $39,236 ±450 ▲ +$5,349▲ +$2,771▲ +$2,578
75th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $17,919 ±786 $21,262 ±682 $31,242 ±1,325 ▲ +$13,323▲ +$9,980▲ +$3,343
Los Angeles citywide $25,574 ±335 $29,719 ±311 $39,236 ±450 ▲ +$13,662▲ +$9,517▲ +$4,145
90th Percentile PT Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $42,830 ±2,335 $43,945 ±2,739 $50,157 ±2,999 ▲ +$7,327▲ +$6,212▲ +$1,115
Los Angeles citywide $68,714 ±742 $73,646 ±1,127 $80,378 ±1,643 ▲ +$11,664▲ +$6,732▲ +$4,932
90th Percentile PT Earnings (nominal dollars) $32,323 ±1,763 $35,815 ±2,233 $50,157 ±2,999 ▲ +$17,834▲ +$14,341▲ +$3,492
Los Angeles citywide $51,857 ±560 $60,021 ±919 $80,378 ±1,643 ▲ +$28,521▲ +$20,356▲ +$8,164

Earnings of All Workers

Category District 8
Average Earnings $46,493±$809
10th Percentile Earnings $6,652±$459
25th Percentile Earnings $18,852±$799
Median Earnings $35,433±$696
75th Percentile Earnings $56,982±$1,685
90th Percentile Earnings $96,178±$2,376
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Average Earnings $46,493±$809 $71,563±$569 ▼ −$25,070 14/15
10th Percentile Earnings $6,652±$459 $7,934±$179 ▼ −$1,281 13/15
25th Percentile Earnings $18,852±$799 $21,876±$191 ▼ −$3,024 14/15
Median Earnings $35,433±$696 $43,575±$259 ▼ −$8,142 14/15
75th Percentile Earnings $56,982±$1,685 $85,854±$580 ▼ −$28,872 14/15
90th Percentile Earnings $96,178±$2,376 Over $100,000 ▼ −$3,822+ 13/15
Note: Includes all workers who reported earnings in the past 12 months, regardless of full-time or part-time/part-year work status. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s earnings brackets among workers who reported earnings. If a percentile of earnings is above $100,000, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over $100,000.” That cutoff has not changed since 2010–14, so it is worth less in later releases: $132,506 in 2024 dollars for 2010–14 and $122,699 for 2015–19.
Universe: Workers 16 years and over with earnings · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $35,889 ±649 $43,013 ±888 $46,493 ±809 ▲ +$10,604▲ +$3,481▲ +$7,124
Los Angeles citywide $59,351 ±430 $65,850 ±455 $71,563 ±569 ▲ +$12,212▲ +$5,713▲ +$6,499
Average Earnings (nominal dollars) $27,085 ±490 $35,055 ±724 $46,493 ±809 ▲ +$19,409▲ +$11,438▲ +$7,971
Los Angeles citywide $44,791 ±324 $53,668 ±371 $71,563 ±569 ▲ +$26,772▲ +$17,895▲ +$8,877
10th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $5,572 ±356 $7,726 ±397 $6,652 ±459 ▲ +$1,080▼ −$1,073▲ +$2,154
Los Angeles citywide $6,842 ±104 $8,269 ±107 $7,934 ±179 ▲ +$1,091▼ −$335▲ +$1,427
10th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $4,205 ±269 $6,296 ±323 $6,652 ±459 ▲ +$2,447▲ +$356▲ +$2,091
Los Angeles citywide $5,164 ±78 $6,739 ±87 $7,934 ±179 ▲ +$2,770▲ +$1,194▲ +$1,576
25th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $14,651 ±421 $17,980 ±556 $18,852 ±799 ▲ +$4,201▲ +$872▲ +$3,329
Los Angeles citywide $17,205 ±143 $20,088 ±119 $21,876 ±191 ▲ +$4,671▲ +$1,789▲ +$2,883
25th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $11,057 ±318 $14,654 ±453 $18,852 ±799 ▲ +$7,795▲ +$4,198▲ +$3,597
Los Angeles citywide $12,984 ±108 $16,372 ±97 $21,876 ±191 ▲ +$8,892▲ +$5,505▲ +$3,387
Median Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $26,718 ±612 $32,355 ±650 $35,433 ±696 ▲ +$8,715▲ +$3,077▲ +$5,638
Los Angeles citywide $35,447 ±232 $39,719 ±188 $43,575 ±259 ▲ +$8,128▲ +$3,856▲ +$4,272
Median Earnings (nominal dollars) $20,163 ±462 $26,370 ±530 $35,433 ±696 ▲ +$15,269▲ +$9,063▲ +$6,206
Los Angeles citywide $26,751 ±175 $32,371 ±154 $43,575 ±259 ▲ +$16,824▲ +$11,204▲ +$5,620
75th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $46,915 ±1,117 $52,991 ±913 $56,982 ±1,685 ▲ +$10,067▲ +$3,991▲ +$6,076
Los Angeles citywide $70,301 ±313 $76,149 ±396 $85,854 ±580 ▲ +$15,552▲ +$9,705▲ +$5,848
75th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $35,406 ±843 $43,188 ±744 $56,982 ±1,685 ▲ +$21,576▲ +$13,794▲ +$7,782
Los Angeles citywide $53,055 ±236 $62,062 ±323 $85,854 ±580 ▲ +$32,798▲ +$23,792▲ +$9,006
90th Percentile Earnings (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $73,063 ±2,015 $84,362 ±2,727 $96,178 ±2,376 ▲ +$23,115▲ +$11,815▲ +$11,300
Los Angeles citywide $127,692 ±642 — — ———
90th Percentile Earnings (nominal dollars) $55,139 ±1,520 $68,755 ±2,222 $96,178 ±2,376 ▲ +$41,039▲ +$27,422▲ +$13,616
Los Angeles citywide $96,367 ±484 — — ———

Economic Mobility

Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in District 8

Category District 8
Household income at age 35 $36,067 ±$278
Household income percentile rank 36.4 ±0.20 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 6.03% ±0.20 pp
Individual income at age 35 $29,993 ±$253
Fraction married 20.6% ±0.33 pp
Employment rate 70.5% ±0.38 pp
Incarceration rate 2.62% ±0.15 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 8. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 8 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category District 8 City Difference
Household income at age 35 $36,067 ±$278 $49,428 ±$104 −$13,361
Household income percentile rank 36.4 ±0.20 pp 45.3 ±0.06 pp −8.8 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 6.03% ±0.20 pp 15.3% ±0.08 pp −9.2 pp
Individual income at age 35 $29,993 ±$253 $37,122 ±$78 −$7,129
Fraction married 20.6% ±0.33 pp 32.5% ±0.11 pp −11.9 pp
Employment rate 70.5% ±0.38 pp 72.6% ±0.11 pp −2.1 pp
Incarceration rate 2.62% ±0.15 pp 1.30% ±0.03 pp +1.3 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 8. Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it. Incarceration was measured on April 1, 2010.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 8 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Predicted Adult Outcomes for People Who Grew Up in District 8 in Lower-Income Families

Category District 8
Household income at age 35 $34,848 ±$348
Household income percentile rank 35.5 ±0.25 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 5.42% ±0.25 pp
Individual income at age 35 $29,130 ±$313
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 8 with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 8 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category District 8 City Difference
Household income at age 35 $34,848 ±$348 $43,490 ±$127 −$8,642
Household income percentile rank 35.5 ±0.25 pp 41.6 ±0.09 pp −6.1 pp
Share reaching the top 20% of household income 5.42% ±0.25 pp 10.5% ±0.10 pp −5.1 pp
Individual income at age 35 $29,130 ±$313 $33,938 ±$103 −$4,807
Note: These are predicted outcomes for children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 8 with parents at the 25th percentile of national household income (about $35,800 a year in 2024 dollars). Adult outcomes were measured in 2014 and 2015, when they were ages 31–37. Income amounts are adjusted for inflation and shown in 2024 dollars; they describe income measured in 2014–2015. Household income includes a spouse’s income; individual income excludes it.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 8 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Geographic Mobility of People Who Grew Up in District 8

Category District 8
Stayed in the greater Los Angeles area 82.3% ±0.32 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 27.5% ±0.37 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 8. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Los Angeles area” means the Census commuting zone for the Los Angeles area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 8 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)
Category District 8 City Difference
Stayed in the greater Los Angeles area 82.3% ±0.32 pp 81.1% ±0.09 pp +1.1 pp
Stayed in the same small immediate neighborhood area 27.5% ±0.37 pp 26.3% ±0.11 pp +1.3 pp
Note: These measures follow children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 8. Adult residence is measured using the most recent available address, generally from 2015, when this cohort was ages 31–37. “Greater Los Angeles area” means the Census commuting zone for the Los Angeles area. “Small immediate neighborhood area” means the childhood Census tract.
Universe: Children born 1978–1983 who grew up in Los Angeles District 8 · Geography: Census tract · Source: IRS tax-return and Census data compiled by Opportunity Insights for The Opportunity Atlas (2018)

Local Businesses

Jobs in District 8

Category District 8
All jobs located in district 8 33,400
District 8 jobs held by District 8 residents 15.1%
District 8 jobs held by non-District 8 residents 84.9%
Employed residents working in District 8 4.6%
Employed residents working outside District 8 95.4%
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category District 8 Los Angeles district median Difference Rank
All jobs located in district 8 33,400 95,694 ▼ −62,294 15/15
District 8 jobs held by District 8 residents 15.1% 11.2% ▲ +4.0 pp 5/15
District 8 jobs held by non-District 8 residents 84.9% 88.8% ▼ −4.0 pp 11/15
Employed residents working in District 8 4.6% 11.4% ▼ −6.8 pp 15/15
Employed residents working outside District 8 95.4% 88.6% ▲ +6.8 pp 1/15
Universe: LODES-covered wage-and-salary jobs located in, or primary jobs held by residents of, this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
All jobs located in district 8 24,514 26,382 33,400 ▲ +8,886▲ +7,018▲ +1,868
Los Angeles citywide 89,273 104,316 95,694 ▲ +6,421▼ −8,622▲ +15,043
District 8 jobs held by District 8 residents 15.8%3,173 17.0%3,542 15.1%4,031 ▼ −0.6 pp▲ +858▼ −1.8 pp▲ +489▲ +1.2 pp▲ +369
Los Angeles citywide 11.4%9,684 11.3%10,616 11.2%11,096 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +1,412▼ −0.1 pp▲ +480▼ −0.1 pp▲ +932
District 8 jobs held by non-District 8 residents 84.2%16,924 83.0%17,347 84.9%22,583 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +5,659▲ +1.8 pp▲ +5,236▼ −1.2 pp▲ +423
Los Angeles citywide 88.6%74,819 88.7%78,864 88.8%78,617 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +3,798▲ +0.1 pp▼ −247▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,045
Employed residents working in District 8 4.2%3,173 4.1%3,542 4.6%4,031 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +858▲ +0.6 pp▲ +489▼ −0.2 pp▲ +369
Los Angeles citywide 10.4%9,684 10.5%10,616 11.4%11,096 ▲ +1.0 pp▲ +1,412▲ +0.9 pp▲ +480– 0.0 pp▲ +932
Employed residents working outside District 8 95.8%72,123 95.9%83,779 95.4%83,277 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +11,154▼ −0.6 pp▼ −502▲ +0.2 pp▲ +11,656
Los Angeles citywide 89.6%77,826 89.5%87,601 88.6%86,195 ▼ −1.0 pp▲ +8,369▼ −0.9 pp▼ −1,406– 0.0 pp▲ +9,775

Industry of Jobs in District 8

Category District 8
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%4
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0
Construction 1.8%598
Manufacturing 3.7%1,244
Wholesale Trade 1.3%431
Retail Trade 9.5%3,160
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 3.2%1,056
↳ Utilities 0.0%0
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 3.2%1,056
Information 0.6%212
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 1.6%551
↳ Finance & Insurance 0.9%299
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 0.8%252
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 9.1%3,036
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 1.2%389
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%4
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 7.9%2,643
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 56.1%18,728
↳ Educational Services 15.5%5,191
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 40.5%13,537
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 8.8%2,938
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.2%64
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 8.6%2,874
Other Services 4.2%1,407
Public Administration 0.1%35
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%4 0.1%1,863 ▼ -0.1% 14/15
↳ Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%0 0.0%95 0% 11/15
Construction 1.8%598 2.7%53,670 ▼ -0.9% 10/15
Manufacturing 3.7%1,244 3.8%76,408 ▼ -0.1% 8/15
Wholesale Trade 1.3%431 3.2%64,041 ▼ -1.9% 13/15
Retail Trade 9.5%3,160 7.1%140,469 ▲ +2.4% 6/15
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 3.2%1,056 5.4%107,363 ▼ -2.2% 8/15
↳ Utilities 0.0%0 0.8%16,873 ▼ -0.8% 15/15
↳ Transportation & Warehousing 3.2%1,056 4.5%90,490 ▼ -1.4% 7/15
Information 0.6%212 8.3%164,777 ▼ -7.6% 14/15
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 1.6%551 5.9%116,890 ▼ -4.2% 14/15
↳ Finance & Insurance 0.9%299 3.6%70,731 ▼ -2.7% 13/15
↳ Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 0.8%252 2.3%46,159 ▼ -1.6% 14/15
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 9.1%3,036 15.1%300,205 ▼ -6.0% 13/15
↳ Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 1.2%389 8.1%160,571 ▼ -6.9% 15/15
↳ Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.0%4 1.1%22,328 ▼ -1.1% 15/15
↳ Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 7.9%2,643 5.9%117,306 ▲ +2.0% 5/15
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 56.1%18,728 28.4%564,032 ▲ +27.7% 1/15
↳ Educational Services 15.5%5,191 10.0%198,175 ▲ +5.6% 4/15
↳ Health Care & Social Assistance 40.5%13,537 18.4%365,857 ▲ +22.1% 1/15
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 8.8%2,938 11.3%224,945 ▼ -2.5% 12/15
↳ Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.2%64 2.8%55,106 ▼ -2.6% 15/15
↳ Accommodation & Food Services 8.6%2,874 8.5%169,839 ▲ +0.1% 8/15
Other Services 4.2%1,407 3.7%73,569 ▲ +0.5% 6/15
Public Administration 0.1%35 5.1%100,972 ▼ -5.0% 12/15
Note: Industry categories follow the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). See the full listing of industries in each category. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Mining 0.0%9 0.0%0 0.0%4 – 0.0 pp▼ −5– 0.0 pp▲ +4– 0.0 pp▼ −9
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%3,692 0.1%1,252 0.1%1,863 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,829– 0.0 pp▲ +611▼ −0.1 pp▼ −2,440
Mining, Quarrying & Oil and Gas Extraction 0.0%9 0.0%0 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp▼ −9– 0.0 pp– 0– 0.0 pp▼ −9
Los Angeles citywide 0.1%1,115 0.0%132 0.0%95 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,020– 0.0 pp▼ −37▼ −0.1 pp▼ −983
Construction 1.2%287 1.4%375 1.8%598 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +311▲ +0.4 pp▲ +223▲ +0.3 pp▲ +88
Los Angeles citywide 2.3%39,739 2.8%53,523 2.7%53,670 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +13,931▼ −0.1 pp▲ +147▲ +0.5 pp▲ +13,784
Manufacturing 3.9%947 2.6%676 3.7%1,244 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +297▲ +1.2 pp▲ +568▼ −1.3 pp▼ −271
Los Angeles citywide 5.7%98,332 4.2%81,930 3.8%76,408 ▼ −1.8 pp▼ −21,924▼ −0.4 pp▼ −5,522▼ −1.4 pp▼ −16,402
Wholesale Trade 3.2%783 2.4%646 1.3%431 ▼ −1.9 pp▼ −352▼ −1.2 pp▼ −215▼ −0.7 pp▼ −137
Los Angeles citywide 4.6%79,491 3.6%68,851 3.2%64,041 ▼ −1.4 pp▼ −15,450▼ −0.3 pp▼ −4,810▼ −1.0 pp▼ −10,640
Retail Trade 16.0%3,928 13.9%3,680 9.5%3,160 ▼ −6.6 pp▼ −768▼ −4.5 pp▼ −520▼ −2.1 pp▼ −248
Los Angeles citywide 8.7%151,083 7.5%144,615 7.1%140,469 ▼ −1.7 pp▼ −10,614▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,146▼ −1.3 pp▼ −6,468
Transportation, Warehousing & Utilities 4.0%973 3.5%913 3.2%1,056 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +83▼ −0.3 pp▲ +143▼ −0.5 pp▼ −60
Los Angeles citywide 4.8%82,154 5.8%111,722 5.4%107,363 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +25,209▼ −0.4 pp▼ −4,359▲ +1.0 pp▲ +29,568
Utilities 0.1%15 0.0%0 0.0%0 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −15– 0.0 pp– 0▼ −0.1 pp▼ −15
Los Angeles citywide 0.9%16,017 1.0%18,483 0.8%16,873 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +856▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,610– 0.0 pp▲ +2,466
Transportation & Warehousing 3.9%958 3.5%913 3.2%1,056 ▼ −0.7 pp▲ +98▼ −0.3 pp▲ +143▼ −0.4 pp▼ −45
Los Angeles citywide 3.8%66,137 4.8%93,239 4.5%90,490 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +24,353▼ −0.3 pp▼ −2,749▲ +1.0 pp▲ +27,102
Information 0.9%218 0.6%169 0.6%212 ▼ −0.3 pp▼ −6– 0.0 pp▲ +43▼ −0.2 pp▼ −49
Los Angeles citywide 6.3%109,667 7.4%142,344 8.3%164,777 ▲ +1.9 pp▲ +55,110▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,433▲ +1.0 pp▲ +32,677
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 2.3%562 2.2%572 1.6%551 ▼ −0.6 pp▼ −11▼ −0.5 pp▼ −21▼ −0.1 pp▲ +10
Los Angeles citywide 6.1%104,878 5.7%110,941 5.9%116,890 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +12,012▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5,949▼ −0.3 pp▲ +6,063
Finance & Insurance 1.4%354 1.2%304 0.9%299 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −55▼ −0.3 pp▼ −5▼ −0.3 pp▼ −50
Los Angeles citywide 3.9%67,959 3.6%69,529 3.6%70,731 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +2,772– 0.0 pp▲ +1,202▼ −0.3 pp▲ +1,570
Real Estate & Rental and Leasing 0.8%208 1.0%268 0.8%252 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +44▼ −0.3 pp▼ −16▲ +0.2 pp▲ +60
Los Angeles citywide 2.1%36,919 2.1%41,412 2.3%46,159 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +9,240▲ +0.2 pp▲ +4,747– 0.0 pp▲ +4,493
Professional, Scientific & Management Services 3.8%922 2.8%728 9.1%3,036 ▲ +5.3 pp▲ +2,114▲ +6.3 pp▲ +2,308▼ −1.0 pp▼ −194
Los Angeles citywide 15.2%262,265 14.9%287,629 15.1%300,205 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +37,940▲ +0.2 pp▲ +12,576▼ −0.3 pp▲ +25,364
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 1.7%412 1.6%425 1.2%389 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −23▼ −0.4 pp▼ −36▼ −0.1 pp▲ +13
Los Angeles citywide 7.7%132,950 7.9%153,596 8.1%160,571 ▲ +0.4 pp▲ +27,621▲ +0.1 pp▲ +6,975▲ +0.3 pp▲ +20,646
Management of Companies & Enterprises 0.4%93 0.0%2 0.0%4 ▼ −0.4 pp▼ −89– 0.0 pp▲ +2▼ −0.4 pp▼ −91
Los Angeles citywide 1.3%22,245 1.2%22,485 1.1%22,328 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +83– 0.0 pp▼ −157▼ −0.1 pp▲ +240
Administrative, Support & Waste Management Services 1.7%417 1.1%301 7.9%2,643 ▲ +6.2 pp▲ +2,226▲ +6.8 pp▲ +2,342▼ −0.6 pp▼ −116
Los Angeles citywide 6.2%107,070 5.8%111,548 5.9%117,306 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +10,236▲ +0.1 pp▲ +5,758▼ −0.4 pp▲ +4,478
Education, Health Care & Social Assistance 50.2%12,317 56.9%15,017 56.1%18,728 ▲ +5.8 pp▲ +6,411▼ −0.8 pp▲ +3,711▲ +6.7 pp▲ +2,700
Los Angeles citywide 24.3%420,720 26.6%514,133 28.4%564,032 ▲ +4.0 pp▲ +143,312▲ +1.7 pp▲ +49,899▲ +2.3 pp▲ +93,413
Educational Services 14.2%3,484 13.4%3,539 15.5%5,191 ▲ +1.3 pp▲ +1,707▲ +2.1 pp▲ +1,652▼ −0.8 pp▲ +55
Los Angeles citywide 8.2%142,270 9.1%175,488 10.0%198,175 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +55,905▲ +0.9 pp▲ +22,687▲ +0.9 pp▲ +33,218
Health Care & Social Assistance 36.0%8,833 43.5%11,478 40.5%13,537 ▲ +4.5 pp▲ +4,704▼ −3.0 pp▲ +2,059▲ +7.5 pp▲ +2,645
Los Angeles citywide 16.1%278,450 17.5%338,645 18.4%365,857 ▲ +2.3 pp▲ +87,407▲ +0.9 pp▲ +27,212▲ +1.4 pp▲ +60,195
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation & Food Services 10.2%2,491 9.4%2,485 8.8%2,938 ▼ −1.4 pp▲ +447▼ −0.6 pp▲ +453▼ −0.7 pp▼ −6
Los Angeles citywide 11.2%193,201 11.8%227,143 11.3%224,945 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +31,744▼ −0.4 pp▼ −2,198▲ +0.6 pp▲ +33,942
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 0.6%159 0.1%31 0.2%64 ▼ −0.5 pp▼ −95▲ +0.1 pp▲ +33▼ −0.5 pp▼ −128
Los Angeles citywide 2.2%38,729 2.8%53,894 2.8%55,106 ▲ +0.5 pp▲ +16,377– 0.0 pp▲ +1,212▲ +0.5 pp▲ +15,165
Accommodation & Food Services 9.5%2,332 9.3%2,454 8.6%2,874 ▼ −0.9 pp▲ +542▼ −0.7 pp▲ +420▼ −0.2 pp▲ +122
Los Angeles citywide 8.9%154,472 9.0%173,249 8.5%169,839 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +15,367▼ −0.4 pp▼ −3,410– 0.0 pp▲ +18,777
Other Services 4.2%1,024 4.1%1,084 4.2%1,407 – 0.0 pp▲ +383▲ +0.1 pp▲ +323▼ −0.1 pp▲ +60
Los Angeles citywide 3.9%67,118 3.9%75,505 3.7%73,569 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +6,451▼ −0.2 pp▼ −1,936– 0.0 pp▲ +8,387
Public Administration 0.2%53 0.1%37 0.1%35 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −18– 0.0 pp▼ −2▼ −0.1 pp▼ −16
Los Angeles citywide 6.8%117,077 5.8%112,871 5.1%100,972 ▼ −1.7 pp▼ −16,105▼ −0.8 pp▼ −11,899▼ −0.9 pp▼ −4,206

Earnings of Jobs in District 8

Category District 8
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 18.7%6,257
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 44.0%14,700
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 37.3%12,443
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 18.7%6,257 17.0%338,334 ▲ +1.7% 4/15
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 44.0%14,700 24.2%481,976 ▲ +19.8% 1/15
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 37.3%12,443 58.8%1,168,894 ▼ -21.5% 15/15
Note: LODES reports earnings in monthly bands; they are shown here as annual amounts. The bands use nominal dollars for each LODES release, including earlier periods. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Jobs paying $15,000/year or less 48.0%11,773 33.5%8,838 18.7%6,257 ▼ −29.3 pp▼ −5,516▼ −14.8 pp▼ −2,581▼ −14.5 pp▼ −2,935
Los Angeles citywide 25.4%439,434 21.3%411,730 17.0%338,334 ▼ −8.4 pp▼ −101,100▼ −4.3 pp▼ −73,396▼ −4.1 pp▼ −27,704
Jobs paying $15,001–$40,000/year 32.2%7,902 42.5%11,209 44.0%14,700 ▲ +11.8 pp▲ +6,798▲ +1.5 pp▲ +3,491▲ +10.3 pp▲ +3,307
Los Angeles citywide 31.8%550,232 29.6%571,659 24.2%481,976 ▼ −7.6 pp▼ −68,256▼ −5.4 pp▼ −89,683▼ −2.2 pp▲ +21,427
Jobs paying more than $40,000/year 19.7%4,839 24.0%6,335 37.3%12,443 ▲ +17.5 pp▲ +7,604▲ +13.2 pp▲ +6,108▲ +4.3 pp▲ +1,496
Los Angeles citywide 42.8%739,751 49.1%949,070 58.8%1,168,894 ▲ +16.0 pp▲ +429,143▲ +9.6 pp▲ +219,824▲ +6.3 pp▲ +209,319

Jobs in District 8 by Firm Age

Category District 8
Firm age: 0–1 years 9.6%2,737
Firm age: 2–3 years 8.7%2,474
Firm age: 4–5 years 8.7%2,493
Firm age: 6–10 years 15.8%4,498
Firm age: 11 or more years 57.2%16,334
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Firm age: 0–1 years 9.6%2,737 4.8%79,589 ▲ +4.8% 1/15
Firm age: 2–3 years 8.7%2,474 4.9%81,747 ▲ +3.8% 1/15
Firm age: 4–5 years 8.7%2,493 5.1%84,784 ▲ +3.7% 1/15
Firm age: 6–10 years 15.8%4,498 10.7%178,901 ▲ +5.1% 1/15
Firm age: 11 or more years 57.2%16,334 74.6%1,248,131 ▼ -17.4% 15/15
Note: Firm-age categories apply only to private-sector jobs. Firm age reflects the employer as a whole, not the age of an individual local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm age: 0–1 years 9.3%1,991 11.7%2,705 9.6%2,737 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +746▼ −2.1 pp▲ +32▲ +2.3 pp▲ +714
Los Angeles citywide 4.7%67,650 4.9%79,103 4.8%79,589 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +11,939▼ −0.1 pp▲ +486▲ +0.2 pp▲ +11,453
Firm age: 2–3 years 8.8%1,871 11.0%2,543 8.7%2,474 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +603▼ −2.3 pp▼ −69▲ +2.2 pp▲ +672
Los Angeles citywide 5.9%85,421 5.5%89,737 4.9%81,747 ▼ −1.0 pp▼ −3,674▼ −0.6 pp▼ −7,990▼ −0.4 pp▲ +4,316
Firm age: 4–5 years 7.5%1,604 7.1%1,654 8.7%2,493 ▲ +1.2 pp▲ +889▲ +1.6 pp▲ +839▼ −0.4 pp▲ +50
Los Angeles citywide 4.8%69,694 5.0%80,835 5.1%84,784 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +15,090▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,949▲ +0.2 pp▲ +11,141
Firm age: 6–10 years 16.2%3,453 14.2%3,294 15.8%4,498 ▼ −0.4 pp▲ +1,045▲ +1.5 pp▲ +1,204▼ −2.0 pp▼ −159
Los Angeles citywide 11.5%166,266 9.8%158,422 10.7%178,901 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +12,635▲ +0.9 pp▲ +20,479▼ −1.7 pp▼ −7,844
Firm age: 11 or more years 58.1%12,383 56.0%12,964 57.2%16,334 ▼ −0.9 pp▲ +3,951▲ +1.3 pp▲ +3,370▼ −2.2 pp▲ +581
Los Angeles citywide 73.1%1,057,667 74.8%1,213,952 74.6%1,248,131 ▲ +1.5 pp▲ +190,464▼ −0.2 pp▲ +34,179▲ +1.7 pp▲ +156,285

Jobs in District 8 by Firm Size

Category District 8
Firm size: 0–19 employees 50.4%14,388
Firm size: 20–49 employees 7.6%2,176
Firm size: 50–249 employees 9.0%2,559
Firm size: 250–499 employees 5.5%1,570
Firm size: 500 or more employees 27.5%7,843
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Firm size: 0–19 employees 50.4%14,388 25.4%425,382 ▲ +25.0% 1/15
Firm size: 20–49 employees 7.6%2,176 9.0%150,177 ▼ -1.4% 14/15
Firm size: 50–249 employees 9.0%2,559 13.5%225,487 ▼ -4.5% 15/15
Firm size: 250–499 employees 5.5%1,570 4.9%82,132 ▲ +0.6% 6/15
Firm size: 500 or more employees 27.5%7,843 47.2%789,974 ▼ -19.7% 14/15
Note: Firm size reflects the employer’s total workforce across all U.S. locations, if relevant, rather than the number of workers at a particular local worksite. The estimates are administrative data and do not have margins of error.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Firm size: 0–19 employees 47.6%10,132 55.8%12,928 50.4%14,388 ▲ +2.9 pp▲ +4,256▼ −5.4 pp▲ +1,460▲ +8.3 pp▲ +2,796
Los Angeles citywide 25.3%366,139 24.7%401,208 25.4%425,382 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +59,243▲ +0.7 pp▲ +24,174▼ −0.6 pp▲ +35,069
Firm size: 20–49 employees 9.6%2,054 6.5%1,506 7.6%2,176 ▼ −2.0 pp▲ +122▲ +1.1 pp▲ +670▼ −3.1 pp▼ −548
Los Angeles citywide 10.3%149,453 9.2%149,991 9.0%150,177 ▼ −1.4 pp▲ +724▼ −0.3 pp▲ +186▼ −1.1 pp▲ +538
Firm size: 50–249 employees 12.9%2,743 9.4%2,172 9.0%2,559 ▼ −3.9 pp▼ −184▼ −0.4 pp▲ +387▼ −3.5 pp▼ −571
Los Angeles citywide 14.8%214,453 13.9%225,502 13.5%225,487 ▼ −1.3 pp▲ +11,034▼ −0.4 pp▼ −15▼ −0.9 pp▲ +11,049
Firm size: 250–499 employees 4.2%902 3.9%895 5.5%1,570 ▲ +1.3 pp▲ +668▲ +1.6 pp▲ +675▼ −0.4 pp▼ −7
Los Angeles citywide 5.6%81,707 4.9%79,848 4.9%82,132 ▼ −0.7 pp▲ +425– 0.0 pp▲ +2,284▼ −0.7 pp▼ −1,859
Firm size: 500 or more employees 25.7%5,471 24.4%5,659 27.5%7,843 ▲ +1.8 pp▲ +2,372▲ +3.1 pp▲ +2,184▼ −1.2 pp▲ +188
Los Angeles citywide 43.9%634,946 47.2%765,500 47.2%789,974 ▲ +3.3 pp▲ +155,028– 0.0 pp▲ +24,474▲ +3.3 pp▲ +130,554

Students

K-12 School Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category District 8
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 17.3% ±0.6 pp17.3%±0.6 pp43,722 ±1,538
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 92.1% ±1.0 pp15.9%±0.2 pp40,257 ±428
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 7.9% ±1.3 pp1.4%±0.2 pp3,464 ±557
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Enrolled in K-12 School (of all residents) 17.3%±0.6 pp17.3%±0.6 pp43,722±1,538 13.6%±0.1 pp13.6%±0.1 pp524,758±5,328 ▲ +3.7%▲ +3.7% 3/15
↳ Public School (of K–12 enrollees) 92.1%±1.0 pp15.9%±0.2 pp40,257±428 86.8%±0.3 pp11.8%±0.0 pp455,658±1,592 ▲ +5.2%▲ +4.1% 5/153/15
↳ Private School (of K–12 enrollees) 7.9%±1.3 pp1.4%±0.2 pp3,464±557 13.2%±0.4 pp1.8%±0.1 pp69,100±2,036 ▼ -5.2%▼ -0.4% 11/158/15
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

College Enrollment

Sub-rows show
Category District 8
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 7.6% ±0.4 pp7.6%±0.4 pp19,198 ±1,129
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 62.9% ±2.9 pp4.8%±0.2 pp12,081 ±547
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 37.1% ±3.2 pp2.8%±0.2 pp7,117 ±622
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 80.5% ±3.2 pp6.1%±0.2 pp15,460 ±613
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 19.5% ±2.2 pp1.5%±0.2 pp3,738 ±421
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Enrolled in College or Graduate School (of all residents) 7.6%±0.4 pp7.6%±0.4 pp19,198±1,129 8.1%±0.1 pp8.1%±0.1 pp310,586±4,276 ▼ -0.4%▼ -0.4% 6/15
↳ Public College or University (of college enrollees) 62.9%±2.9 pp4.8%±0.2 pp12,081±547 70.9%±0.7 pp5.7%±0.1 pp220,274±2,032 ▼ -8.0%▼ -0.9% 13/1514/15
↳ Private College or University (of college enrollees) 37.1%±3.2 pp2.8%±0.2 pp7,117±622 29.1%±0.6 pp2.3%±0.0 pp90,312±1,878 ▲ +8.0%▲ +0.5% 3/155/15
↳ Undergraduate College (of college enrollees) 80.5%±3.2 pp6.1%±0.2 pp15,460±613 77.3%±0.5 pp6.2%±0.0 pp240,126±1,419 ▲ +3.2%▼ -0.1% 5/154/15
↳ Graduate or Professional School (of college enrollees) 19.5%±2.2 pp1.5%±0.2 pp3,738±421 22.7%±0.6 pp1.8%±0.0 pp70,460±1,837 ▼ -3.2%▼ -0.3% 11/1511/15
Universe: Total population · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Student Digital Access

Category District 8
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 6.0% ±1.3 pp2,873 ±601
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 8.6% ±2.5 pp1,589 ±468
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
K–12 Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 6.0%±1.3 pp2,873±601 3.9%±0.3 pp— ▲ +2.1% 2/15
College Students Without a Computer and/or Internet 8.6%±2.5 pp1,589±468 4.2%±0.4 pp— ▲ +4.4% 2/15
Universe: K-12 row — students enrolled in Pre-K through 12th grade; College row — students enrolled in college or graduate school · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Stock & Stability

Owner vs. Renter-Occupied Housing

Category District 8
Owner-Occupied Households 38.4% ±1.1 pp30,492 ±835
Renter-Occupied Households 61.6% ±1.5 pp48,828 ±1,180
Owner-Occupied Residents 42.1% ±1.4 pp104,821 ±3,433
Renter-Occupied Residents 57.9% ±1.6 pp144,005 ±3,944
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Owner-Occupied Households 38.4%±1.1 pp30,492±835 36.0%±0.3 pp518,423±4,359 ▲ +2.4% 7/15
Renter-Occupied Households 61.6%±1.5 pp48,828±1,180 64.0%±0.3 pp920,674±4,643 ▼ -2.4% 9/15
Owner-Occupied Residents 42.1%±1.4 pp104,821±3,433 40.2%±0.4 pp1,509,388±15,216 ▲ +1.9% 6/15
Renter-Occupied Residents 57.9%±1.6 pp144,005±3,944 59.8%±0.4 pp2,243,250±15,217 ▼ -1.9% 10/15
Universe varies by row: household rows show the share of occupied housing units that are owner- versus renter-occupied; resident rows show the share of residents (people in occupied housing units, excluding group quarters) who live in owner- versus renter-occupied homes · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Year Moved Into Current Home

Category District 8
Median Year Moved In 2012±0.4 yr
Moved in 2023 or Later 3.3% ±0.5 pp2,615 ±426
Moved in 2020 to 2022 12.5% ±0.9 pp9,912 ±706
Moved in 2010 to 2019 44.6% ±1.7 pp35,261 ±1,357
Moved in 2000 to 2009 19.1% ±1.2 pp15,149 ±941
Moved in 1990 to 1999 10.6% ±0.9 pp8,395 ±740
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 9.9% ±0.7 pp7,813 ±581
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Median Year Moved In 2012±0.4 yr 2014±1.0 yr ▼ −2 10/15
Moved in 2023 or Later 3.3%±0.5 pp2,615±426 4.9%±0.1 pp70,211±2,138 ▼ -1.6% 14/15
Moved in 2020 to 2022 12.5%±0.9 pp9,912±706 20.6%±0.3 pp296,921±3,730 ▼ -8.1% 15/15
Moved in 2010 to 2019 44.6%±1.7 pp35,261±1,357 40.3%±0.3 pp580,466±4,993 ▲ +4.2% 1/15
Moved in 2000 to 2009 19.1%±1.2 pp15,149±941 16.2%±0.2 pp233,668±3,490 ▲ +2.9% 4/15
Moved in 1990 to 1999 10.6%±0.9 pp8,395±740 9.8%±0.2 pp140,815±2,779 ▲ +0.8% 6/15
Moved in 1989 or Earlier 9.9%±0.7 pp7,813±581 8.1%±0.2 pp117,016±2,469 ▲ +1.7% 4/15
Note: Move-in years come from the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year estimates, which pooled survey responses collected over a five-year period.
Universe: Primary Resident in Household · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Prior Location of Recent Movers

Sub-rows show
Category District 8
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 7.6% ±0.6 pp7.6%±0.6 pp19,134 ±1,625
↳ Moved Within Los Angeles County (of recent movers) 5.7% ±0.6 pp74.4%±4.6 pp14,241 ±1,501
↳ Moved from Different California County (of recent movers) 0.6% ±0.1 pp8.1%±1.7 pp1,554 ±346
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 0.6% ±0.1 pp7.6%±1.8 pp1,445 ±370
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 0.8% ±0.2 pp9.9%±2.2 pp1,895 ±457
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Moved Within the Past Year (of all residents) 7.6%±0.6 pp7.6%±0.6 pp19,134±1,625 10.7%±0.2 pp10.7%±0.2 pp408,463±7,943 ▼ -3.0%▼ -3.0% 13/15
↳ Moved Within Los Angeles County (of recent movers) 5.7%±0.6 pp74.4%±4.6 pp14,241±1,501 7.4%±0.2 pp69.3%±1.2 pp283,263±7,240 ▼ -1.7%▲ +5.1% 12/154/15
↳ Moved from Different California County (of recent movers) 0.6%±0.1 pp8.1%±1.7 pp1,554±346 1.2%±0.0 pp11.0%±0.4 pp45,056±1,766 ▼ -0.6%▼ -2.9% 14/1510/15
↳ Moved from Different State (of recent movers) 0.6%±0.1 pp7.6%±1.8 pp1,445±370 1.3%±0.1 pp12.3%±0.5 pp50,444±2,220 ▼ -0.7%▼ -4.8% 13/1511/15
↳ Moved from Abroad (of recent movers) 0.8%±0.2 pp9.9%±2.2 pp1,895±457 0.8%±0.0 pp7.3%±0.4 pp29,700±1,624 0%▲ +2.6% 7/153/15
Universe: Population 1 year and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Vacancy Status

Sub-rows show
Category District 8
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 6.0% ±0.6 pp6.0%±0.6 pp5,072 ±517
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 2.0% ±0.4 pp33.7%±5.4 pp1,710 ±325
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.1% ±0.2 pp2.5%±2.8 pp126 ±144
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.2% ±0.2 pp3.4%±3.0 pp170 ±152
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 3.6% ±0.6 pp60.4%±7.4 pp3,066 ±490
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 3.4% ±0.6 pp3.4%±0.6 pp—
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 0.4% ±0.5 pp0.4%±0.5 pp—
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Overall Vacancy Rate (of housing units) 6.0%±0.6 pp6.0%±0.6 pp5,072±517 7.4%±0.2 pp7.4%±0.2 pp115,235±3,037 ▼ -1.4%▼ -1.4% 9/15
↳ Vacant: For Rent (of vacant units) 2.0%±0.4 pp33.7%±5.4 pp1,710±325 2.9%±0.1 pp38.6%±1.2 pp44,494±1,787 ▼ -0.8%▼ -4.9% 10/1511/15
↳ Vacant: For Sale (of vacant units) 0.1%±0.2 pp2.5%±2.8 pp126±144 0.3%±0.0 pp4.0%±0.4 pp4,630±529 ▼ -0.1%▼ -1.5% 12/1512/15
↳ Vacant: Owner's Residence Elsewhere (of vacant units) 0.2%±0.2 pp3.4%±3.0 pp170±152 0.4%±0.0 pp5.6%±0.6 pp6,482±671 ▼ -0.2%▼ -2.3% 10/1511/15
↳ Vacant: All Other (of vacant units) 3.6%±0.6 pp60.4%±7.4 pp3,066±490 3.8%±0.2 pp51.7%±2.8 pp59,629±3,638 ▼ -0.2%▲ +8.7% 7/152/15
Rental Vacancy Rate (of rental units) 3.4%±0.6 pp3.4%±0.6 pp— 4.6%±0.2 pp4.6%±0.2 pp— ▼ -1.2%▼ -1.2% 10/15
Owner Vacancy Rate (of owner units) 0.4%±0.5 pp0.4%±0.5 pp— 0.9%±0.1 pp0.9%±0.1 pp— ▼ -0.5%▼ -0.5% 13/15
Note: “All other” vacant units combines units that are seasonal, held for migrant workers, rented/sold but not yet occupied, or vacant for other reasons. The two vacancy-rate rows use a different base: the rental vacancy rate counts units actively listed for rent as a share of total rental stock (renter-occupied, rented-not-yet-occupied, and listed for rent), and the owner vacancy rate uses the equivalent owner-unit denominator (owner-occupied, sold but not yet occupied, and listed for sale).
Universe: All housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Housing Age

Category District 8
Median Year Built 1952±1 yr
Pre-1940 39.1% ±1.2 pp32,932 ±1,014
1940-2009 55.0% ±1.9 pp46,322 ±1,590
2010+ 5.9% ±0.7 pp4,981 ±587
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Median Year Built 1952±1 yr 1965±1 yr ▼ −13 yrs 15/15
Pre-1940 39.1%±1.2 pp32,932±1,014 19.1%±0.2 pp296,223±3,073 ▲ +20.0% 1/15
1940-2009 55.0%±1.9 pp46,322±1,590 73.1%±0.4 pp1,136,164±6,801 ▼ -18.1% 14/15
2010+ 5.9%±0.7 pp4,981±587 7.8%±0.2 pp121,945±2,871 ▼ -1.9% 11/15
Note: Year-built figures are based on residents’ self-reports. Many people do not know the precise year their building was constructed, so these distributions should be treated as approximate rather than exact.
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Units by Building Size

Category District 8
Population Density 15,741 /sq mi±363/sq mi
Single-Family Homes 59.0% ±1.4 pp49,725 ±1,144
Buildings With 2–4 Units 17.8% ±1.1 pp15,005 ±966
Buildings With 5–19 Units 15.2% ±1.1 pp12,800 ±946
Buildings With 20 or More Units 7.6% ±0.7 pp6,374 ±616
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Population Density 15,741 /sq mi±363/sq mi 8,155 /sq mi±14/sq mi ▲ +7,586 /sq mi 4/15
Single-Family Homes 59.0%±1.4 pp49,725±1,144 41.9%±0.3 pp651,793±4,742 ▲ +17.1% 3/15
Buildings With 2–4 Units 17.8%±1.1 pp15,005±966 9.0%±0.2 pp140,536±2,829 ▲ +8.8% 3/15
Buildings With 5–19 Units 15.2%±1.1 pp12,800±946 18.4%±0.3 pp286,023±4,408 ▼ -3.2% 10/15
Buildings With 20 or More Units 7.6%±0.7 pp6,374±616 29.9%±0.3 pp465,391±4,691 ▼ -22.4% 15/15
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Homes by Number of Bedrooms

Category District 8
Studio 6.4% ±0.7 pp5,418 ±556
1 Bedroom 21.6% ±1.1 pp18,234 ±955
2 Bedrooms 34.5% ±1.5 pp29,031 ±1,271
3 Bedrooms 28.6% ±1.2 pp24,087 ±980
4 Bedrooms 6.8% ±0.6 pp5,761 ±522
5 or More Bedrooms 2.0% ±0.4 pp1,704 ±306
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Studio 6.4%±0.7 pp5,418±556 11.6%±0.2 pp180,439±3,649 ▼ -5.2% 12/15
1 Bedroom 21.6%±1.1 pp18,234±955 23.7%±0.2 pp367,883±3,808 ▼ -2.0% 10/15
2 Bedrooms 34.5%±1.5 pp29,031±1,271 30.8%±0.3 pp478,829±4,610 ▲ +3.7% 6/15
3 Bedrooms 28.6%±1.2 pp24,087±980 21.9%±0.2 pp339,889±3,797 ▲ +6.7% 5/15
4 Bedrooms 6.8%±0.6 pp5,761±522 9.1%±0.1 pp140,925±2,101 ▼ -2.2% 9/15
5 or More Bedrooms 2.0%±0.4 pp1,704±306 3.0%±0.1 pp46,367±1,494 ▼ -1.0% 8/15
Universe: Housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Overcrowded Housing

Sub-rows show
Category District 8
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 15.8% ±1.1 pp15.8%±1.1 pp12,481 ±843
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 9.5% ±0.8 pp60.1%±3.2 pp7,505 ±648
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 6.3% ±0.7 pp39.9%±3.6 pp4,975 ±563
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Overcrowded: More Than 1 Person per Room (of occupied housing units) 15.8%±1.1 pp15.8%±1.1 pp12,481±843 12.1%±0.2 pp12.1%±0.2 pp174,164±3,256 ▲ +3.7%▲ +3.7% 4/15
↳ Moderately Overcrowded: 1.01–1.50 People per Room (of overcrowded units) 9.5%±0.8 pp60.1%±3.2 pp7,505±648 5.9%±0.1 pp49.1%±0.8 pp85,502±2,139 ▲ +3.5%▲ +11.0% 3/153/15
↳ Severely Overcrowded: 1.51 or More People per Room (of overcrowded units) 6.3%±0.7 pp39.9%±3.6 pp4,975±563 6.2%±0.2 pp50.9%±1.1 pp88,662±2,479 ▲ +0.1%▼ -11.0% 8/1513/15
Note: Rooms are defined as living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, and enclosed porches. Bathrooms, closets, hallways, and unfinished spaces are not counted as rooms.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Sub-rows show

Primary Home Heating Fuel

Category District 8
Natural Gas Heat 63.1% ±1.4 pp49,939 ±1,131
Electric Heat 24.5% ±1.3 pp19,420 ±993
Other Heating Source 12.4% ±1.0 pp9,785 ±806
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Natural Gas Heat 63.1%±1.4 pp49,939±1,131 57.3%±0.3 pp823,973±4,848 ▲ +5.8% 4/15
Electric Heat 24.5%±1.3 pp19,420±993 34.3%±0.3 pp494,304±4,648 ▼ -9.8% 14/15
Other Heating Source 12.4%±1.0 pp9,785±806 8.4%±0.2 pp120,823±2,850 ▲ +4.0% 4/15
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Housing Costs & Affordability

Housing Cost Burden

Show
Category District 8
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 24.1% ±1.3 pp19,044 ±994
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 19.0% ±1.1 pp15,071 ±891
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 56.9% ±1.5 pp45,029 ±1,195
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 34.7% ±1.4 pp27,427 ±1,092
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Spending Less Than 20% of Income on Housing 24.1%±1.3 pp19,044±994 18.4%±0.3 pp264,606±4,113 ▲ +5.7% 12/15
Spending 20% to 29% of Income on Housing 19.0%±1.1 pp15,071±891 20.5%±0.3 pp294,961±4,022 ▼ -1.5% 15/15
Cost Burdened: Spending 30% or More on Housing 56.9%±1.5 pp45,029±1,195 56.5%±0.3 pp813,715±5,000 ▲ +0.4% 2/15
↳ Severely Cost Burdened: Spending 50% or More on Housing 34.7%±1.4 pp27,427±1,092 31.1%±0.3 pp447,155±4,325 ▲ +3.6% 1/15
Note: Housing costs include gross rent for renters and selected monthly owner costs for owners, including costs beyond mortgage payments. Shares exclude units whose housing-cost-to-income ratio is not computed. Spending 30% or more is cost burdened; 50% or more is a subset of that group.
Universe: Occupied housing units with a computed housing-cost-to-income ratio · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Monthly Housing Costs

Category District 8
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $547±$36
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,059±$32
Median Monthly Housing Costs $1,705±$31
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $2,466±$40
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $547±$36 $787±$11 ▼ −$240 14/15
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $1,059±$32 $1,347±$8 ▼ −$288 14/15
Median Monthly Housing Costs $1,705±$31 $2,115±$9 ▼ −$410 13/15
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs $2,466±$40 Over $3,000 ▼ −$534+ 13/15
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs Over $3,000 Over $3,000 — 1/15
Note: Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s monthly housing cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly housing costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $3,681 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $530 ±25 $584 ±34 $547 ±36 ▲ +$17▼ −$37▲ +$54
Los Angeles citywide $734 ±7 $763 ±8 $787 ±11 ▲ +$53▲ +$24▲ +$29
10th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $400 ±19 $476 ±28 $547 ±36 ▲ +$147▲ +$71▲ +$76
Los Angeles citywide $554 ±6 $622 ±7 $787 ±11 ▲ +$233▲ +$165▲ +$68
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,015 ±24 $1,080 ±24 $1,059 ±32 ▲ +$43▼ −$21▲ +$64
Los Angeles citywide $1,206 ±4 $1,299 ±6 $1,347 ±8 ▲ +$141▲ +$48▲ +$93
25th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $766 ±18 $880 ±20 $1,059 ±32 ▲ +$292▲ +$179▲ +$114
Los Angeles citywide $910 ±3 $1,058 ±5 $1,347 ±8 ▲ +$437▲ +$289▲ +$148
Median Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,547 ±23 $1,638 ±22 $1,705 ±31 ▲ +$158▲ +$68▲ +$91
Los Angeles citywide $1,817 ±7 $1,985 ±7 $2,115 ±9 ▲ +$298▲ +$130▲ +$169
Median Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,167 ±17 $1,335 ±18 $1,705 ±31 ▲ +$538▲ +$371▲ +$167
Los Angeles citywide $1,371 ±5 $1,618 ±6 $2,115 ±9 ▲ +$744▲ +$497▲ +$247
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,281 ±35 $2,356 ±28 $2,466 ±40 ▲ +$185▲ +$110▲ +$76
Los Angeles citywide — $2,970 ±11 — ———
75th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) $1,721 ±27 $1,920 ±23 $2,466 ±40 ▲ +$745▲ +$546▲ +$199
Los Angeles citywide — $2,420 ±9 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $3,114 ±60 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Housing Costs (nominal dollars) — $2,538 ±49 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Rent

Rent measure
Category District 8
Average Rent Plus Utilities $1,632±$31
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $612±$60
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,060±$38
Median Rent Plus Utilities $1,529±$39
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,051±$55
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,678±$83
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Average Rent Plus Utilities $1,632±$31 $2,131±$12 ▼ −$499 15/15
10th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $612±$60 $934±$12 ▼ −$322 14/15
25th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $1,060±$38 $1,380±$9 ▼ −$320 15/15
Median Rent Plus Utilities $1,529±$39 $1,933±$9 ▼ −$404 14/15
75th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,051±$55 $2,639±$17 ▼ −$588 14/15
90th Percentile Rent Plus Utilities $2,678±$83 Over $3,500 ▼ −$822+ 14/15
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8
Average Rent $1,376±$25
10th Percentile Rent $402±$78
25th Percentile Rent $899±$35
Median Rent $1,287±$37
75th Percentile Rent $1,812±$33
90th Percentile Rent $2,338±$52
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Average Rent $1,376±$25 $1,927±$12 ▼ −$550 15/15
10th Percentile Rent $402±$78 $808±$12 ▼ −$406 14/15
25th Percentile Rent $899±$35 $1,217±$8 ▼ −$318 15/15
Median Rent $1,287±$37 $1,765±$8 ▼ −$478 15/15
75th Percentile Rent $1,812±$33 $2,416±$11 ▼ −$604 14/15
90th Percentile Rent $2,338±$52 $3,289±$24 ▼ −$952 14/15
Note: Rent is what renters pay their landlord; Rent plus Utilities adds the estimated cost of utilities renters pay separately. Rent plus Utilities is the better comparison, since some units include utilities in the rent and others bill them separately. Both reflect what current renters pay, not asking rents. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s rent brackets and describe units that pay cash rent. If a percentile of rent is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $2,000 in 2010–14 ($2,650 in 2024 dollars). It has been $3,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,294 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Renter-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Rent measure

Homeowner Costs With a Mortgage

Category District 8
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,825±$65
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,568±$71
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,079±$58
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,741±$68
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,630±$116
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,825±$65 $4,133±$34 ▼ −$1,308 14/15
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $1,568±$71 $1,828±$21 ▼ −$260 13/15
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,079±$58 $2,537±$17 ▼ −$458 14/15
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $2,741±$68 $3,497±$23 ▼ −$756 14/15
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) $3,630±$116 Over $4,000 ▼ −$370+ 14/15
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) Over $4,000 Over $4,000 — 1/15
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $3,000 in 2010–14 ($3,975 in 2024 dollars). It has been $4,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $4,908 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units with a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,578 ±49 $2,642 ±38 $2,825 ±65 ▲ +$247▲ +$183▲ +$64
Los Angeles citywide $3,870 ±21 $3,856 ±17 $4,133 ±34 ▲ +$263▲ +$276▼ −$13
Average Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,945 ±37 $2,153 ±31 $2,825 ±65 ▲ +$879▲ +$672▲ +$208
Los Angeles citywide $2,920 ±16 $3,143 ±14 $4,133 ±34 ▲ +$1,212▲ +$990▲ +$223
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,477 ±56 $1,552 ±65 $1,568 ±71 ▲ +$91▲ +$16▲ +$75
Los Angeles citywide $1,744 ±13 $1,827 ±19 $1,828 ±21 ▲ +$85▲ +$2▲ +$83
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,114 ±42 $1,265 ±53 $1,568 ±71 ▲ +$453▲ +$303▲ +$150
Los Angeles citywide $1,316 ±10 $1,489 ±15 $1,828 ±21 ▲ +$512▲ +$340▲ +$173
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $1,959 ±51 $1,985 ±39 $2,079 ±58 ▲ +$120▲ +$94▲ +$26
Los Angeles citywide $2,379 ±13 $2,448 ±17 $2,537 ±17 ▲ +$158▲ +$89▲ +$69
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,478 ±38 $1,618 ±31 $2,079 ±58 ▲ +$601▲ +$461▲ +$140
Los Angeles citywide $1,796 ±10 $1,995 ±14 $2,537 ±17 ▲ +$741▲ +$542▲ +$199
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $2,533 ±45 $2,547 ±47 $2,741 ±68 ▲ +$208▲ +$193▲ +$15
Los Angeles citywide $3,315 ±21 $3,342 ±16 $3,497 ±23 ▲ +$182▲ +$155▲ +$27
Median Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $1,911 ±34 $2,076 ±38 $2,741 ±68 ▲ +$829▲ +$664▲ +$165
Los Angeles citywide $2,502 ±16 $2,724 ±13 $3,497 ±23 ▲ +$995▲ +$773▲ +$222
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $3,267 ±55 $3,215 ±70 $3,630 ±116 ▲ +$363▲ +$415▼ −$52
Los Angeles citywide — $4,663 ±31 — ———
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) $2,465 ±41 $2,620 ±57 $3,630 ±116 ▲ +$1,165▲ +$1,010▲ +$155
Los Angeles citywide — $3,800 ±25 — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $4,040 ±108 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (With Mortgage) (nominal dollars) — $3,293 ±88 — ———
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Monthly Homeowner Costs Without a Mortgage

Category District 8
Average Monthly Owner Costs $847±$39
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $375±$45
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $536±$36
Median Monthly Owner Costs $748±$45
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,036±$57
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,473±$95
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Average Monthly Owner Costs $847±$39 $1,309±$21 ▼ −$462 13/15
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $375±$45 $456±$10 ▼ −$81 12/15
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $536±$36 $674±$10 ▼ −$138 13/15
Median Monthly Owner Costs $748±$45 $1,001±$14 ▼ −$253 14/15
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,036±$57 $1,491±$15 ▼ −$455 14/15
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs $1,473±$95 Over $1,500 ▼ −$27+ 13/15
Note: Selected monthly owner costs include real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood insurance; electricity, gas, water and sewer; other fuels; and, where applicable, homeowners association or condominium fees. For mobile homes, they also include site rent, personal-property taxes, registration, and license fees. Mortgage and other property-backed debt payments are excluded. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s cost brackets. If a percentile of monthly owner costs is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $700 in 2010–14 ($928 in 2024 dollars). It has been $1,500 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $1,840 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units without a mortgage · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $618 ±17 $717 ±27 $847 ±39 ▲ +$228▲ +$130▲ +$98
Los Angeles citywide $974 ±11 $1,068 ±13 $1,309 ±21 ▲ +$335▲ +$242▲ +$93
Average Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $467 ±13 $584 ±22 $847 ±39 ▲ +$380▲ +$263▲ +$117
Los Angeles citywide $735 ±8 $870 ±11 $1,309 ±21 ▲ +$574▲ +$439▲ +$135
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $309 ±35 $324 ±35 $375 ±45 ▲ +$66▲ +$51▲ +$15
Los Angeles citywide $372 ±7 $397 ±7 $456 ±10 ▲ +$84▲ +$59▲ +$25
10th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $233 ±26 $264 ±29 $375 ±45 ▲ +$142▲ +$111▲ +$31
Los Angeles citywide $281 ±5 $323 ±6 $456 ±10 ▲ +$176▲ +$133▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $420 ±31 $470 ±31 $536 ±36 ▲ +$117▲ +$66▲ +$51
Los Angeles citywide $544 ±7 $586 ±8 $674 ±10 ▲ +$130▲ +$88▲ +$43
25th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $317 ±23 $383 ±25 $536 ±36 ▲ +$220▲ +$153▲ +$67
Los Angeles citywide $410 ±5 $478 ±6 $674 ±10 ▲ +$264▲ +$196▲ +$68
Median Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $583 ±23 $664 ±27 $748 ±45 ▲ +$165▲ +$84▲ +$81
Los Angeles citywide $806 ±11 $880 ±10 $1,001 ±14 ▲ +$195▲ +$121▲ +$74
Median Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $440 ±18 $541 ±22 $748 ±45 ▲ +$308▲ +$207▲ +$101
Los Angeles citywide $608 ±8 $717 ±8 $1,001 ±14 ▲ +$393▲ +$284▲ +$109
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $783 ±37 $894 ±45 $1,036 ±57 ▲ +$253▲ +$142▲ +$111
Los Angeles citywide — $1,304 ±17 $1,491 ±15 —▲ +$187—
75th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) $591 ±28 $729 ±37 $1,036 ±57 ▲ +$445▲ +$307▲ +$138
Los Angeles citywide — $1,062 ±14 $1,491 ±15 —▲ +$428—
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) — $1,139 ±98 $1,473 ±95 —▲ +$334—
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———
90th Percentile Monthly Owner Costs (nominal dollars) — $928 ±80 $1,473 ±95 —▲ +$544—
Los Angeles citywide — — — ———

Home Values

Category District 8
Average Home Value $737,144±$26,863
10th Percentile Home Value $393,644±$32,030
25th Percentile Home Value $533,776±$12,465
Median Home Value $693,426±$12,364
75th Percentile Home Value $892,706±$13,310
90th Percentile Home Value $1,148,472±$60,676
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Average Home Value $737,144±$26,863 $1,264,542±$8,234 ▼ −$527,398 13/15
10th Percentile Home Value $393,644±$32,030 $459,299±$5,965 ▼ −$65,655 12/15
25th Percentile Home Value $533,776±$12,465 $653,300±$4,641 ▼ −$119,524 13/15
Median Home Value $693,426±$12,364 $921,200±$4,782 ▼ −$227,774 14/15
75th Percentile Home Value $892,706±$13,310 $1,397,000±$18,800 ▼ −$504,294 13/15
90th Percentile Home Value $1,148,472±$60,676 Over $2,000,000 ▼ −$851,528+ 12/15
Note: Home values are self-reported by owners of owner-occupied housing units. Percentiles are estimated from the Census’s home value brackets. If a percentile of home values is above a certain amount, the Census Bureau does not release the specific value, so we show “Over” that amount. That cutoff was $1,000,000 in 2010–14 ($1,325,058 in 2024 dollars). It has been $2,000,000 since 2015–19, so it is worth less in later releases: $2,453,983 in 2024 dollars for 2015–19.
Universe: Owner-occupied housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
2010–14 2015–19 2020–24 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $381,165 ±10,224 $555,537 ±12,509 $737,144 ±26,863 ▲ +$355,980▲ +$181,608▲ +$174,372
Los Angeles citywide $824,079 ±6,442 $1,055,784 ±9,073 $1,264,542 ±8,234 ▲ +$440,464▲ +$208,758▲ +$231,705
Average Home Value (nominal dollars) $287,659 ±7,716 $452,763 ±10,195 $737,144 ±26,863 ▲ +$449,485▲ +$284,381▲ +$165,104
Los Angeles citywide $621,919 ±4,862 $860,465 ±7,394 $1,264,542 ±8,234 ▲ +$642,624▲ +$404,077▲ +$238,547
10th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $203,704 ±13,092 $307,609 ±13,148 $393,644 ±32,030 ▲ +$189,940▲ +$86,035▲ +$103,905
Los Angeles citywide $274,172 ±2,766 $388,878 ±2,619 $459,299 ±5,965 ▲ +$185,126▲ +$70,421▲ +$114,706
10th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $153,732 ±9,881 $250,702 ±10,716 $393,644 ±32,030 ▲ +$239,912▲ +$142,942▲ +$96,970
Los Angeles citywide $206,913 ±2,087 $316,936 ±2,134 $459,299 ±5,965 ▲ +$252,385▲ +$142,362▲ +$110,023
25th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $285,625 ±6,371 $404,743 ±7,398 $533,776 ±12,465 ▲ +$248,151▲ +$129,033▲ +$119,118
Los Angeles citywide $413,153 ±2,182 $543,435 ±2,444 $653,300 ±4,641 ▲ +$240,147▲ +$109,865▲ +$130,281
25th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $215,556 ±4,808 $329,866 ±6,029 $533,776 ±12,465 ▲ +$318,220▲ +$203,910▲ +$114,310
Los Angeles citywide $311,800 ±1,647 $442,900 ±1,992 $653,300 ±4,641 ▲ +$341,500▲ +$210,400▲ +$131,100
Median Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $376,450 ±5,883 $528,273 ±8,545 $693,426 ±12,364 ▲ +$316,976▲ +$165,153▲ +$151,823
Los Angeles citywide $601,311 ±2,870 $781,471 ±2,656 $921,200 ±4,782 ▲ +$319,889▲ +$139,729▲ +$180,160
Median Home Value (nominal dollars) $284,101 ±4,439 $430,543 ±6,964 $693,426 ±12,364 ▲ +$409,325▲ +$262,883▲ +$146,442
Los Angeles citywide $453,800 ±2,166 $636,900 ±2,165 $921,200 ±4,782 ▲ +$467,400▲ +$284,300▲ +$183,100
75th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $490,172 ±6,705 $714,962 ±16,513 $892,706 ±13,310 ▲ +$402,534▲ +$177,744▲ +$224,791
Los Angeles citywide $957,885 ±4,252 $1,163,924 ±5,481 $1,397,000 ±18,800 ▲ +$439,115▲ +$233,076▲ +$206,040
75th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $369,925 ±5,061 $582,695 ±13,458 $892,706 ±13,310 ▲ +$522,781▲ +$310,011▲ +$212,771
Los Angeles citywide $722,900 ±3,209 $948,600 ±4,467 $1,397,000 ±18,800 ▲ +$674,100▲ +$448,400▲ +$225,700
90th Percentile Home Value (inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars) $641,354 ±17,095 $896,371 ±13,121 $1,148,472 ±60,676 ▲ +$507,118▲ +$252,101▲ +$255,018
Los Angeles citywide — $2,103,035 ±25,625 — ———
90th Percentile Home Value (nominal dollars) $484,019 ±12,901 $730,544 ±10,694 $1,148,472 ±60,676 ▲ +$664,453▲ +$417,928▲ +$246,525
Los Angeles citywide — $1,713,977 ±20,884 — ———

Federal Housing Assistance

Sub-rows show
Category District 8
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 14.1%14.1%11,832
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 11.5%82.1%9,718
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 2.2%15.5%1,831
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.3%2.4%283
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units (of housing units) 14.1%14.1%11,832 5.5%5.5%84,827 ▲ +8.6%▲ +8.6% 1/15
↳ Housing Choice Vouchers (of HUD-subsidized units) 11.5%82.1%9,718 3.5%64.0%54,313 ▲ +8.0%▲ +18.1% 1/152/15
↳ Public Housing (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.0%0.0%0 0.4%7.1%6,040 ▼ -0.4%▼ -7.1% 7/157/15
↳ Project-Based Section 8 (of HUD-subsidized units) 2.2%15.5%1,831 1.4%25.1%21,260 ▲ +0.8%▼ -9.6% 4/1512/15
↳ Other Project-Based Programs (of HUD-subsidized units) 0.3%2.4%283 0.2%3.8%3,214 ▲ +0.1%▼ -1.4% 5/1510/15
Note: Counts housing units receiving federal rental assistance as a share of all housing units, excluding Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties. The four program rows are specific HUD programs; “Other project-based programs” combines Section 202 (elderly), Section 811 (disability), and smaller project-based programs. These are administrative records rather than survey estimates, so they have no margin of error.
Universe: Total housing units · Geography: Census Tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
HUD-Subsidized Housing Units 15.0%12,248 15.3%13,063 14.0%11,832 ▼ −1.0 pp▼ −416▼ −1.2 pp▼ −1,231▲ +0.2 pp▲ +815
Los Angeles citywide 5.6%79,280 5.5%82,357 5.5%84,827 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +5,547▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,470– 0.0 pp▲ +3,077
Housing Choice Vouchers 12.4%10,138 12.8%10,930 11.5%9,718 ▼ −0.9 pp▼ −420▼ −1.2 pp▼ −1,212▲ +0.3 pp▲ +792
Los Angeles citywide 3.4%47,994 3.4%50,854 3.5%54,313 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +6,319▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,459– 0.0 pp▲ +2,860
Public Housing 0.0%26 0.0%26 0.0%0 – 0.0 pp▼ −26– 0.0 pp▼ −26– 0.0 pp– 0
Los Angeles citywide 0.5%7,024 0.5%7,038 0.4%6,040 ▼ −0.1 pp▼ −984▼ −0.1 pp▼ −998– 0.0 pp▲ +14
Project-Based Section 8 2.2%1,805 2.1%1,827 2.2%1,831 – 0.0 pp▲ +26– 0.0 pp▲ +4▼ −0.1 pp▲ +22
Los Angeles citywide 1.5%21,053 1.4%21,190 1.4%21,260 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +207▼ −0.1 pp▲ +70▼ −0.1 pp▲ +137
Other Project-Based Programs 0.3%279 0.3%280 0.3%283 – 0.0 pp▲ +4– 0.0 pp▲ +3– 0.0 pp▲ +1
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%3,209 0.2%3,275 0.2%3,214 – 0.0 pp▲ +5– 0.0 pp▼ −61– 0.0 pp▲ +66
Sub-rows show

Characteristics of Federal Housing Assistance Recipients

Category District 8
Average Household Income $21,783
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $574
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,807
Below 30% of Area Median Income 85.1%8,749
With Children 28.9%2,971
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 42.3%4,349
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this district. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this district. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this district.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Average Household Income $21,783 $20,771 ▲ +$1,012 5/15
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $574 $532 ▲ +$42 5/15
Average Monthly Government Spending $1,807 $1,653 ▲ +$154 3/15
Below 30% of Area Median Income 85.1%8,749 88.0%66,617 ▼ -2.9 pp 12/15
With Children 28.9%2,971 20.0%15,140 ▲ +8.9 pp 3/15
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 42.3%4,349 43.0%32,551 ▼ -0.7 pp 8/15
Note: Describes households receiving federal rental assistance in this district. Tenant-paid rent is the household’s own share of the rent after the subsidy; monthly government spending is what HUD pays toward that household’s housing. Area median income is calculated by HUD for the surrounding metropolitan area, not for this district. The “With Children” measure is available only for 2020–2024; it is shown as blank for 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 in historical views. In Count view, household counts are estimated by applying each share to the number of HUD-assisted households in this district.
Universe: HUD-assisted households · Geography: Census tract · Source: HUD Picture of Subsidized Households 2025 (administrative data; no margin of error)
2014 2019 2025 2010–14 → 2020–242015–19 → 2020–242010–14 → 2015–19
Average Household Income $13,858 $17,162 $21,771 ▲ +$7,913▲ +$4,609▲ +$3,304
Los Angeles citywide $14,082 $16,770 $20,771 ▲ +$6,689▲ +$4,001▲ +$2,688
Average Tenant-Paid Rent $385 $446 $574 ▲ +$188▲ +$128▲ +$61
Los Angeles citywide $372 $432 $532 ▲ +$160▲ +$100▲ +$60
Average Monthly Government Spending $845 $1,072 $1,808 ▲ +$963▲ +$736▲ +$227
Los Angeles citywide $795 $1,013 $1,653 ▲ +$858▲ +$640▲ +$218
Below 30% of Area Median Income 82.0%— 81.3%— 85.1%— ▲ +3.2 pp—▲ +3.8 pp—▼ −0.7 pp—
Los Angeles citywide 84.0%— 85.0%— 88.0%— ▲ +4.0 pp—▲ +3.0 pp—▲ +1.0 pp—
With Children — — 28.8%— ——————
Los Angeles citywide — — 20.0%— ——————
Head or Spouse Has a Disability 40.8%— 43.6%— 42.5%— ▲ +1.7 pp—▼ −1.2 pp—▲ +2.9 pp—

Environment

Tree Canopy and Land Cover

Category District 8
Total Tree Canopy 5.7%590 acres
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 81.9%8,539 acres
Natural Open Surfaces 12.5%1,298 acres
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Total Tree Canopy 5.7%590 acres 15.3%46,226 acres ▼ -9.6% 14/15
Impervious Surfaces (No Canopy) 81.9%8,539 acres 56.2%170,078 acres ▲ +25.6% 2/15
Natural Open Surfaces 12.5%1,298 acres 28.5%86,111 acres ▼ -16.0% 14/15
Note: These estimates do not have margins of error because they are derived from classified aerial imagery, not a survey.
Universe: Land area classified from high-resolution aerial imagery · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: USDA Forest Service, Arbor Day Foundation, and PlanIT Geo National Baseline Assessment of Urban and Community Forests, 2026

Population Vulnerable to Extreme Heat

Category District 8
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 12.4% ±1.3 pp31,354 ±3,307
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 46.4% ±1.8 pp117,168 ±4,511
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 41.1% ±1.7 pp103,823 ±4,317
Heat Exposed 0.0%0
Homes Without Air Conditioning 35.8%90,446
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. Heat Exposed is the share of residents living in census tracts the Census Bureau flagged as exposed to extreme heat in 2022. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates; neither those nor the heat exposure figures have a margin of error, as with CDC PLACES data.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
No Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 12.4%±1.3 pp31,354±3,307 19.5%±0.3 pp751,486±13,284 ▼ -7.1% 14/15
1–2 Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 46.4%±1.8 pp117,168±4,511 47.6%±0.4 pp1,834,137±16,773 ▼ -1.1% 9/15
3 or More Heat Vulnerability Risk Factors 41.1%±1.7 pp103,823±4,317 33.0%±0.4 pp1,271,640±15,551 ▲ +8.2% 3/15
Heat Exposed 0.0%0 52.6%2,029,926 ▼ -52.6% 12/15
Homes Without Air Conditioning 35.8%90,446 19.5%751,605 ▲ +16.4% 2/15
Note: Heat vulnerability risk factors include characteristics such as age, income, disability, English proficiency, and household access to transportation — see the full list of risk factors and how they are measured. Heat Exposed is the share of residents living in census tracts the Census Bureau flagged as exposed to extreme heat in 2022. The air conditioning figures are modeled estimates from the Census Bureau’s Local Air Conditioning Estimates; neither those nor the heat exposure figures have a margin of error, as with CDC PLACES data.
Universe: Residents for heat vulnerability risk factors; occupied housing units for air conditioning · Geography: Census Tract · Source: Census Community Resilience Estimates for Heat; Census Local Air Conditioning Estimates

Transportation & Commuting

How Workers Commute

Category District 8
Drove Alone 73.6% ±1.3 pp68,580 ±1,216
Carpooled 10.6% ±1.0 pp9,856 ±890
Public Transit 9.7% ±0.9 pp9,002 ±870
Walked 2.3% ±0.4 pp2,113 ±390
Bikes 0.7% ±0.3 pp665 ±235
Other Commute Mode 2.7% ±0.5 pp2,500 ±450
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Drove Alone 73.6%±1.3 pp68,580±1,216 74.3%±0.1 pp1,409,806±2,191 ▼ -0.7% 10/15
Carpooled 10.6%±1.0 pp9,856±890 10.8%±0.2 pp204,995±4,626 ▼ -0.2% 9/15
Public Transit 9.7%±0.9 pp9,002±870 7.6%±0.2 pp144,003±3,960 ▲ +2.1% 5/15
Walked 2.3%±0.4 pp2,113±390 4.0%±0.1 pp75,140±2,786 ▼ -1.7% 9/15
Bikes 0.7%±0.3 pp665±235 0.7%±0.1 pp13,831±1,185 0% 8/15
Other Commute Mode 2.7%±0.5 pp2,500±450 2.6%±0.1 pp49,004±2,073 ▲ +0.1% 1/15
Universe: Workers 16 years and over who commute to work (excludes those working from home) · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Commute Time

Category District 8
Average Commute Time (minutes) 35 min±0.6 min
Less Than 15 Minutes 8.3% ±0.7 pp7,800 ±687
15–29 Minutes 29.9% ±1.4 pp27,957 ±1,340
30–44 Minutes 33.8% ±1.3 pp31,667 ±1,195
45–59 Minutes 11.4% ±0.8 pp10,689 ±750
60 Minutes or More 16.5% ±1.0 pp15,489 ±982
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Average Commute Time (minutes) 35 min±0.6 min 31 min±0.2 min ▲ +4 min 1/15
Less Than 15 Minutes 8.3%±0.7 pp7,800±687 15.9%±0.3 pp241,948±4,532 ▼ -7.5% 15/15
15–29 Minutes 29.9%±1.4 pp27,957±1,340 33.1%±0.3 pp504,776±4,959 ▼ -3.2% 13/15
30–44 Minutes 33.8%±1.3 pp31,667±1,195 28.9%±0.3 pp440,595±5,010 ▲ +5.0% 2/15
45–59 Minutes 11.4%±0.8 pp10,689±750 10.3%±0.2 pp156,750±2,883 ▲ +1.2% 3/15
60 Minutes or More 16.5%±1.0 pp15,489±982 11.9%±0.2 pp182,392±3,293 ▲ +4.6% 1/15
Universe: Workers age 16+ (excl. those working from home) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Vehicle Access

Category District 8
Average Vehicles per Household 1.62±0.04
Households With No Vehicle 16.3% ±1.2 pp12,928 ±920
Households With 1 Vehicle 33.8% ±1.4 pp26,741 ±1,081
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 49.9% ±1.7 pp39,476 ±1,324
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Average Vehicles per Household 1.62±0.04 1.61±0.01 ▲ +0.01 7/15
Households With No Vehicle 16.3%±1.2 pp12,928±920 11.9%±0.2 pp171,011±3,141 ▲ +4.5% 6/15
Households With 1 Vehicle 33.8%±1.4 pp26,741±1,081 40.0%±0.3 pp575,741±4,305 ▼ -6.2% 11/15
Households With 2 or More Vehicles 49.9%±1.7 pp39,476±1,324 48.1%±0.4 pp692,345±5,259 ▲ +1.8% 6/15
Universe: Occupied housing units · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Where District 8 Residents Work

Category District 8
Downtown 7.6%7,748
Westchester 3.4%3,446
Westlake 2.2%2,267
Westwood 1.9%1,974
Koreatown 1.6%1,575
All other city neighborhoods 30.9%31,401
Outside the city 52.3%53,050
Culver City city, CA 2.8%2,865
Santa Monica city, CA 2.1%2,110
Inglewood city, CA 2.0%2,011
Burbank city, CA 2.0%2,006
Torrance city, CA 1.9%1,970
All other California locations 40.7%41,297
Out of state 0.8%791
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for district 8 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category District 8 City Difference
Downtown 7.6%7,748 5.7%102,334 ▲ +1.9%
Westchester 3.4%3,446 1.2%22,331 ▲ +2.1%
Westlake 2.2%2,267 1.5%26,376 ▲ +0.8%
Westwood 1.9%1,974 2.2%39,104 ▼ -0.2%
Koreatown 1.6%1,575 1.3%23,504 ▲ +0.2%
All other city neighborhoods 30.9%31,401 32.3%577,272 ▼ -1.3%
Outside the city 52.3%53,050 49.1%879,015 ▲ +3.1%
Culver City city, CA 2.8%2,865 NA%— —
Santa Monica city, CA 2.1%2,110 NA%— —
Inglewood city, CA 2.0%2,011 NA%— —
Burbank city, CA 2.0%2,006 NA%— —
Torrance city, CA 1.9%1,970 NA%— —
All other California locations 40.7%41,297 30.8%550,181 ▲ +9.9%
Out of state 0.8%791 0.9%15,602 ▼ -0.1%
Note: The table shows the five most common work neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for district 8 residents; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Downtown 9.6%8,244 8.6%8,639 7.6%7,748 ▼ −2.0 pp▼ −496▼ −0.9 pp▼ −891▼ −1.0 pp▲ +395
Los Angeles citywide 6.5%101,787 6.3%110,096 5.7%102,334 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +547▼ −0.5 pp▼ −7,762▼ −0.3 pp▲ +8,309
Westchester 3.7%3,164 4.2%4,204 3.4%3,446 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +282▼ −0.8 pp▼ −758▲ +0.5 pp▲ +1,040
Los Angeles citywide 1.4%21,796 1.5%25,859 1.2%22,331 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +535▼ −0.2 pp▼ −3,528▲ +0.1 pp▲ +4,063
Westlake 2.3%1,996 2.3%2,305 2.2%2,267 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +271▼ −0.1 pp▼ −38– 0.0 pp▲ +309
Los Angeles citywide 1.6%24,688 1.5%26,406 1.5%26,376 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,688– 0.0 pp▼ −30▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,718
Westwood 1.6%1,418 1.9%1,953 1.9%1,974 ▲ +0.3 pp▲ +556– 0.0 pp▲ +21▲ +0.3 pp▲ +535
Los Angeles citywide 2.2%34,237 2.4%43,072 2.2%39,104 – 0.0 pp▲ +4,867▼ −0.3 pp▼ −3,968▲ +0.3 pp▲ +8,835
Koreatown 1.6%1,404 1.5%1,521 1.6%1,575 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +171– 0.0 pp▲ +54▼ −0.1 pp▲ +117
Los Angeles citywide 1.4%22,136 1.3%22,395 1.3%23,504 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +1,368– 0.0 pp▲ +1,109▼ −0.1 pp▲ +259
All other city neighborhoods 30.0%25,833 29.8%29,977 30.9%31,401 ▲ +0.9 pp▲ +5,568▲ +1.2 pp▲ +1,424▼ −0.3 pp▲ +4,144
Los Angeles citywide 31.2%488,847 31.5%555,449 32.3%577,272 ▲ +1.0 pp▲ +88,425▲ +0.7 pp▲ +21,823▲ +0.3 pp▲ +66,602
Outside the city 51.1%43,923 51.7%52,039 52.3%53,050 ▲ +1.2 pp▲ +9,127▲ +0.6 pp▲ +1,011▲ +0.6 pp▲ +8,116
Los Angeles citywide 49.2%770,649 48.8%859,004 49.1%879,015 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +108,366▲ +0.4 pp▲ +20,011▼ −0.5 pp▲ +88,355
Culver City city, CA 2.2%1,923 2.5%2,541 2.8%2,865 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +942▲ +0.3 pp▲ +324▲ +0.3 pp▲ +618
Los Angeles citywide 2.1%32,510 1.8%31,682 1.8%33,029 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +519– 0.0 pp▲ +1,347▼ −0.3 pp▼ −828
Santa Monica city, CA 2.3%1,986 2.3%2,317 2.1%2,110 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +124▼ −0.2 pp▼ −207– 0.0 pp▲ +331
Los Angeles citywide 2.6%39,923 2.4%42,575 2.2%39,651 ▼ −0.3 pp▼ −272▼ −0.2 pp▼ −2,924▼ −0.1 pp▲ +2,652
Inglewood city, CA 2.0%1,736 1.8%1,824 2.0%2,011 – 0.0 pp▲ +275▲ +0.2 pp▲ +187▼ −0.2 pp▲ +88
Los Angeles citywide 0.6%8,773 0.5%8,884 0.6%10,707 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,934▲ +0.1 pp▲ +1,823▼ −0.1 pp▲ +111
Burbank city, CA 1.4%1,173 1.9%1,863 2.0%2,006 ▲ +0.6 pp▲ +833▲ +0.1 pp▲ +143▲ +0.5 pp▲ +690
Los Angeles citywide 5.8%90,580 7.3%128,242 7.5%134,754 ▲ +1.7 pp▲ +44,174▲ +0.3 pp▲ +6,512▲ +1.5 pp▲ +37,662
Torrance city, CA 1.8%1,528 1.9%1,942 1.9%1,970 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +442– 0.0 pp▲ +28▲ +0.2 pp▲ +414
Los Angeles citywide 1.2%18,644 1.2%20,681 1.1%19,569 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +925▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,112– 0.0 pp▲ +2,037
All other California locations 40.5%34,837 40.7%40,912 40.7%41,297 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,460– 0.0 pp▲ +385▲ +0.1 pp▲ +6,075
Los Angeles citywide 31.6%494,091 30.2%531,945 30.8%550,181 ▼ −0.8 pp▲ +56,090▲ +0.6 pp▲ +18,236▼ −1.4 pp▲ +37,854
Out of state 0.7%600 0.6%640 0.8%791 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +191▲ +0.1 pp▲ +151▼ −0.1 pp▲ +40
Los Angeles citywide 0.8%12,591 0.9%15,246 0.9%15,602 ▲ +0.1 pp▲ +3,011– 0.0 pp▲ +356▲ +0.1 pp▲ +2,655

Home Neighborhoods of People Working in District 8

Category District 8
Hyde Park 3.2%1,069
Vermont Square 2.2%726
Exposition Park 1.8%585
Vermont Vista 1.6%537
Vermont Knolls 1.5%516
All other city neighborhoods 37.7%12,603
Outside the city 52.0%17,364
Inglewood city, CA 2.6%882
Long Beach city, CA 2.1%718
Compton city, CA 1.8%600
Hawthorne city, CA 1.5%507
Westmont CDP, CA 1.4%470
All other California locations 42.1%14,061
Out of state 0.4%126
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for people working in district 8; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
Category District 8 City Difference
Hyde Park 3.2%1,069 0.4%8,314 ▲ +2.8%
Vermont Square 2.2%726 0.5%9,795 ▲ +1.7%
Exposition Park 1.8%585 0.3%6,258 ▲ +1.4%
Vermont Vista 1.6%537 0.2%4,436 ▲ +1.4%
Vermont Knolls 1.5%516 0.2%3,831 ▲ +1.4%
All other city neighborhoods 37.7%12,603 34.3%683,260 ▲ +3.4%
Outside the city 52.0%17,364 54.2%1,078,898 ▼ -2.2%
Inglewood city, CA 2.6%882 NA%— —
Long Beach city, CA 2.1%718 NA%— —
Compton city, CA 1.8%600 NA%— —
Hawthorne city, CA 1.5%507 NA%— —
Westmont CDP, CA 1.4%470 NA%— —
All other California locations 42.1%14,061 43.5%864,880 ▼ -1.4%
Out of state 0.4%126 1.4%27,219 ▼ -1.0%
Note: The table shows the five most common home neighborhoods and the five most common California municipalities outside the city for people working in district 8; remaining locations are grouped into all other city neighborhoods and all other California locations. Administrative data with no margin of error. Because LODES does not identify whether a worker actually traveled to the reported worksite, permanent work-from-home employees may be assigned to their employer’s worksite even when they make no trip there.
Universe: LODES-covered private-sector wage-and-salary jobs located in this district. LODES identifies jobs primarily from state Unemployment Insurance records and does not cover self-employed workers or other employment outside that system, including military, railroad, certain agricultural, nonprofit, family, and some federal jobs. · Geography: Census Blocks · Source: U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), 2023
2014 2019 2023 2014 → 20232019 → 20232014 → 2019
Hyde Park 3.3%801 3.6%954 3.2%1,069 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +268▼ −0.4 pp▲ +115▲ +0.3 pp▲ +153
Los Angeles citywide 0.4%7,391 0.4%8,534 0.4%8,314 – 0.0 pp▲ +923– 0.0 pp▼ −220– 0.0 pp▲ +1,143
Vermont Square 2.4%588 2.7%708 2.2%726 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +138▼ −0.5 pp▲ +18▲ +0.3 pp▲ +120
Los Angeles citywide 0.5%8,286 0.5%9,732 0.5%9,795 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,509– 0.0 pp▲ +63– 0.0 pp▲ +1,446
Exposition Park 1.9%476 2.1%565 1.8%585 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +109▼ −0.4 pp▲ +20▲ +0.2 pp▲ +89
Los Angeles citywide 0.3%5,769 0.3%6,498 0.3%6,258 – 0.0 pp▲ +489– 0.0 pp▼ −240– 0.0 pp▲ +729
Vermont Vista 1.8%429 1.8%466 1.6%537 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +108▼ −0.2 pp▲ +71– 0.0 pp▲ +37
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%3,723 0.2%4,241 0.2%4,436 – 0.0 pp▲ +713– 0.0 pp▲ +195– 0.0 pp▲ +518
Vermont Knolls 1.8%433 1.9%496 1.5%516 ▼ −0.2 pp▲ +83▼ −0.3 pp▲ +20▲ +0.1 pp▲ +63
Los Angeles citywide 0.2%3,203 0.2%3,794 0.2%3,831 – 0.0 pp▲ +628– 0.0 pp▲ +37– 0.0 pp▲ +591
All other city neighborhoods 38.8%9,512 38.9%10,271 37.7%12,603 ▼ −1.1 pp▲ +3,091▼ −1.2 pp▲ +2,332▲ +0.1 pp▲ +759
Los Angeles citywide 34.6%598,998 35.0%676,100 34.3%683,260 ▼ −0.3 pp▲ +84,262▼ −0.6 pp▲ +7,160▲ +0.4 pp▲ +77,102
Outside the city 50.1%12,275 49.0%12,922 52.0%17,364 ▲ +1.9 pp▲ +5,089▲ +3.0 pp▲ +4,442▼ −1.1 pp▲ +647
Los Angeles citywide 54.0%933,978 53.3%1,029,698 54.2%1,078,898 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +144,920▲ +1.0 pp▲ +49,200▼ −0.7 pp▲ +95,720
Inglewood city, CA 3.2%782 3.1%822 2.6%882 ▼ −0.5 pp▲ +100▼ −0.5 pp▲ +60▼ −0.1 pp▲ +40
Los Angeles citywide 1.1%18,541 1.1%20,675 1.0%19,514 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +973▼ −0.1 pp▼ −1,161– 0.0 pp▲ +2,134
Long Beach city, CA 2.0%489 2.1%546 2.1%718 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +229▲ +0.1 pp▲ +172▲ +0.1 pp▲ +57
Los Angeles citywide 1.6%27,863 1.6%31,820 1.6%32,264 – 0.0 pp▲ +4,401– 0.0 pp▲ +444– 0.0 pp▲ +3,957
Compton city, CA 1.6%401 1.7%442 1.8%600 ▲ +0.2 pp▲ +199▲ +0.1 pp▲ +158– 0.0 pp▲ +41
Los Angeles citywide 0.5%7,968 0.5%9,846 0.5%9,753 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,785– 0.0 pp▼ −93– 0.0 pp▲ +1,878
Hawthorne city, CA 1.6%397 1.8%472 1.5%507 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +110▼ −0.3 pp▲ +35▲ +0.2 pp▲ +75
Los Angeles citywide 0.7%12,413 0.7%14,127 0.7%13,590 – 0.0 pp▲ +1,177– 0.0 pp▼ −537– 0.0 pp▲ +1,714
Westmont CDP, CA 1.5%367 1.5%408 1.4%470 ▼ −0.1 pp▲ +103▼ −0.1 pp▲ +62– 0.0 pp▲ +41
Los Angeles citywide 0.3%4,373 0.3%5,038 0.2%4,921 – 0.0 pp▲ +548– 0.0 pp▼ −117– 0.0 pp▲ +665
All other California locations 39.7%9,735 38.5%10,164 42.1%14,061 ▲ +2.4 pp▲ +4,326▲ +3.6 pp▲ +3,897▼ −1.2 pp▲ +429
Los Angeles citywide 43.4%751,264 42.5%821,105 43.5%864,880 – 0.0 pp▲ +113,616▲ +1.0 pp▲ +43,775▼ −1.0 pp▲ +69,841
Out of state 0.4%104 0.3%68 0.4%126 – 0.0 pp▲ +22▲ +0.1 pp▲ +58▼ −0.2 pp▼ −36
Los Angeles citywide 0.7%12,236 0.9%18,326 1.4%27,219 ▲ +0.7 pp▲ +14,983▲ +0.4 pp▲ +8,893▲ +0.2 pp▲ +6,090

Technology Access

Household Computer Access

Category District 8
No Computer or Smartphone 4.5% ±0.5 pp3,528 ±421
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 16.2% ±1.2 pp12,808 ±927
Desktop or Laptop Available 68.0% ±1.3 pp53,788 ±1,059
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
No Computer or Smartphone 4.5%±0.5 pp3,528±421 3.6%±0.1 pp51,208±2,038 ▲ +0.9% 6/15
Smartphone Only, No Desktop or Laptop 16.2%±1.2 pp12,808±927 9.4%±0.2 pp134,973±3,565 ▲ +6.8% 2/15
Desktop or Laptop Available 68.0%±1.3 pp53,788±1,059 81.8%±0.3 pp1,177,551±4,293 ▼ -13.9% 14/15
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Household Internet Access

Category District 8
Has Internet Access 92.3% ±0.8 pp73,014 ±664
Cellular Data Plan Only 13.8% ±1.1 pp10,955 ±882
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 2.4% ±0.4 pp1,872 ±328
No Internet Access 7.7% ±0.8 pp6,130 ±645
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Has Internet Access 92.3%±0.8 pp73,014±664 94.6%±0.2 pp1,361,126±2,605 ▼ -2.3% 12/15
Cellular Data Plan Only 13.8%±1.1 pp10,955±882 11.8%±0.2 pp169,117±3,594 ▲ +2.1% 6/15
Internet Access Without a Paid Subscription 2.4%±0.4 pp1,872±328 1.9%±0.1 pp27,326±1,276 ▲ +0.5% 4/15
No Internet Access 7.7%±0.8 pp6,130±645 5.4%±0.2 pp77,971±2,871 ▲ +2.3% 4/15
Universe: Households · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health

Health Insurance

Category District 8
Uninsured Residents 10.6% ±0.6 pp26,692 ±1,458
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 2.9% ±0.7 pp7,425 ±1,685
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 15.4% ±0.9 pp38,917 ±2,264
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 2.1% ±0.7 pp5,371 ±1,720
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Uninsured Residents 10.6%±0.6 pp26,692±1,458 9.5%±0.1 pp364,737±5,710 ▲ +1.1% 7/15
↳ Uninsured Children Under 19 2.9%±0.7 pp7,425±1,685 3.3%±0.2 pp125,674±9,298 ▼ -0.3% 12/15
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 19–64 15.4%±0.9 pp38,917±2,264 13.1%±0.2 pp506,732±8,178 ▲ +2.3% 5/15
↳ Uninsured Adults Ages 65 and Older 2.1%±0.7 pp5,371±1,720 1.9%±0.2 pp72,725±8,236 ▲ +0.2% 7/15
Note: The 2010–2014 child rate is for ages under 18 and its younger-adult rate is for ages 18–64; later releases use under 19 and ages 19–64. The insurance coverage question itself is unchanged; all-residents and 65+ rates use the same age definitions across periods.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms); each by-age rate is a share of that age group, not of all residents · Geography: Census Block Group · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Health Insurance Coverage Types

Category District 8
Insured (Any Coverage) 89.4% ±0.6 pp225,301 ±1,456
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 30.3% ±0.8 pp76,267 ±1,909
Direct-Purchase Insurance 4.6% ±0.4 pp11,694 ±908
Medicare 12.6% ±0.5 pp31,845 ±1,341
Medicaid 46.1% ±1.0 pp116,230 ±2,479
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.2% ±0.2 pp630 ±399
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 4.8% ±0.4 pp12,173 ±1,133
Uninsured 10.6% ±0.6 pp26,650 ±1,456
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Insured (Any Coverage) 89.4%±0.6 pp225,301±1,456 90.5%±0.2 pp3,468,249±6,113 ▼ -1.1% 9/15
Coverage types (may overlap)
Employer-Based Insurance 30.3%±0.8 pp76,267±1,909 40.6%±0.3 pp1,556,236±11,598 ▼ -10.4% 13/15
Direct-Purchase Insurance 4.6%±0.4 pp11,694±908 11.5%±0.2 pp439,171±6,009 ▼ -6.8% 15/15
Medicare 12.6%±0.5 pp31,845±1,341 13.1%±0.2 pp502,686±5,846 ▼ -0.5% 11/15
Medicaid 46.1%±1.0 pp116,230±2,479 30.1%±0.2 pp1,152,695±9,490 ▲ +16.0% 2/15
Military Health Coverage (TRICARE / VA) 0.2%±0.2 pp630±399 0.2%±0.0 pp8,178±741 0% 4/15
Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified 4.8%±0.4 pp12,173±1,133 4.2%±0.1 pp160,627±3,851 ▲ +0.6% 1/15
Uninsured 10.6%±0.6 pp26,650±1,456 9.5%±0.2 pp362,202±6,113 ▲ +1.1% 7/15
Note: People can have more than one type of health insurance, so coverage type rows are not mutually exclusive and will not sum to the insured total. Some multiple-coverage combinations are not attributed to a specific coverage type and are grouped as “Multiple Types of Insurance, Specific Types Unspecified.” Medicaid includes other means-tested public insurance types such as CHIP.
Universe: Civilian noninstitutionalized population (excludes institutionalized group quarters, such as correctional facilities and nursing homes; includes residents of college dorms) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Disability

Category District 8
Adults With at Least One Disability 19.2% ±0.8 pp36,857 ±1,556
Mobility Disability 11.4% ±0.6 pp21,869 ±1,167
Hearing Disability 3.3% ±0.4 pp6,357 ±716
Vision Disability 4.0% ±0.4 pp7,682 ±748
Cognitive Disability 7.2% ±0.5 pp13,904 ±1,032
Self-Care Disability 5.5% ±0.5 pp10,539 ±880
Independent Living Disability 8.9% ±0.6 pp16,987 ±1,143
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Adults With at Least One Disability 19.2%±0.8 pp36,857±1,556 13.4%±0.2 pp413,424±4,833 ▲ +5.8% 1/15
Mobility Disability 11.4%±0.6 pp21,869±1,167 7.1%±0.1 pp220,306±3,715 ▲ +4.3% 1/15
Hearing Disability 3.3%±0.4 pp6,357±716 3.0%±0.1 pp92,708±2,400 ▲ +0.3% 2/15
Vision Disability 4.0%±0.4 pp7,682±748 2.7%±0.1 pp83,292±2,320 ▲ +1.3% 1/15
Cognitive Disability 7.2%±0.5 pp13,904±1,032 5.1%±0.1 pp158,649±3,239 ▲ +2.1% 1/15
Self-Care Disability 5.5%±0.5 pp10,539±880 3.4%±0.1 pp104,391±2,633 ▲ +2.1% 1/15
Independent Living Disability 8.9%±0.6 pp16,987±1,143 6.1%±0.1 pp187,616±3,478 ▲ +2.8% 1/15
Note: People can report more than one disability, so the percent with at least one disability will be less than the sum of the individual disability categories. See the disability measures page for the ACS question wording.
Universe: Adult population 18 years and over · Geography: Census Tract · Source: ACS 2020–2024

Incidence of Health Problems

Category District 8
Arthritis 20.9%40,580
High Blood Pressure 34.5%67,034
Cancer 4.2%8,152
Current Asthma 10.9%21,139
Coronary Heart Disease 5.8%11,262
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 6.2%12,093
Diabetes 15.6%30,327
High Cholesterol 35.1%68,206
Obesity 34.3%66,581
Stroke 4.3%8,346
Lost All Natural Teeth 3.1%6,036
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Arthritis 20.9%40,580 18.8%558,377 ▲ +2.1% 1/15
High Blood Pressure 34.5%67,034 28.8%855,387 ▲ +5.7% 1/15
Cancer 4.2%8,152 5.4%160,385 ▼ -1.2% 13/15
Current Asthma 10.9%21,139 9.4%279,189 ▲ +1.5% 1/15
Coronary Heart Disease 5.8%11,262 5.0%148,505 ▲ +0.8% 1/15
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) 6.2%12,093 4.9%145,535 ▲ +1.3% 2/15
Diabetes 15.6%30,327 11.9%353,441 ▲ +3.7% 1/15
High Cholesterol 35.1%68,206 35.2%1,045,473 ▼ -0.1% 9/15
Obesity 34.3%66,581 27.3%810,835 ▲ +7.0% 2/15
Stroke 4.3%8,346 3.1%92,073 ▲ +1.2% 1/15
Lost All Natural Teeth 3.1%6,036 1.9%55,491 ▲ +1.2% 1/15
Note: All measures ask if a health care provider diagnosed the given condition except obesity (calculated from self-reported height and weight) and all teeth lost (self-reported). Cancer includes melanoma but excludes non-melanoma skin cancers. The all teeth lost question is asked only of adults age 65 or older, but we display values for the adult population, assuming those age 18–64 have not lost all their teeth.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for all teeth lost; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Health Risk Behaviors

Category District 8
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 14.0%27,237
Current Cigarette Smoking 15.3%29,800
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 34.2%66,428
Short Sleep Duration 42.0%81,595
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Binge Drinking in Past 30 Days 14.0%27,237 15.9%472,245 ▼ -1.9% 15/15
Current Cigarette Smoking 15.3%29,800 11.9%353,441 ▲ +3.4% 2/15
No Leisure-Time Physical Activity 34.2%66,428 26.5%787,075 ▲ +7.7% 2/15
Short Sleep Duration 42.0%81,595 36.5%1,084,084 ▲ +5.5% 1/15
Note: Binge drinking means 5 or more drinks on at least one occasion for men, or 4 or more for women, in the past 30 days. Current cigarette smoking means smoking every day or some days. Physical inactivity means no leisure-time physical activity in the past month. Short sleep duration means averaging fewer than 7 hours of sleep per 24-hour period.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for most measures and 2022 for short sleep duration; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Overall Health Status

Category District 8
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 33.8%65,589
Frequent Physical Distress 17.6%34,218
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Fair or Poor Self-Reported Health 33.8%65,589 25.1%745,493 ▲ +8.7% 2/15
Frequent Physical Distress 17.6%34,218 14.4%427,693 ▲ +3.2% 2/15
Note: Frequent physical distress means self-reported physical health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Preventive Care

Category District 8
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 70.8%137,500
Routine Checkup in Past Year 71.1%138,221
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 81.0%157,446
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 50.1%97,441
Dental Visit in Past Year 49.1%95,422
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 73.8%143,349
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Taking Medication for High Blood Pressure 70.8%137,500 69.3%2,058,274 ▲ +1.5% 3/15
Routine Checkup in Past Year 71.1%138,221 70.5%2,093,916 ▲ +0.6% 6/15
Cholesterol Check in Past 5 Years 81.0%157,446 83.0%2,465,177 ▼ -2.0% 12/15
Up to Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening 50.1%97,441 54.0%1,603,850 ▼ -3.9% 11/15
Dental Visit in Past Year 49.1%95,422 58.9%1,749,385 ▼ -9.8% 14/15
Mammogram in Past 2 Years 73.8%143,349 74.8%2,221,630 ▼ -1.0% 9/15
Universe: Annual checkup, cholesterol screening, and dental visit: adults 18 and over; blood pressure medication: adults 18 and over with high blood pressure; colorectal cancer screening: adults 45–75; mammography: women 50–74 · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023 for routine checkup, cholesterol screening, and blood-pressure medication, and 2022 for colorectal screening, dental visit, and mammography; modeled estimates; no margin of error

Mental Health

Category District 8
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 20.1%39,134
Frequent Mental Distress 19.9%38,761
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 36.7%71,232
Loneliness 45.1%87,663
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error
Category District 8 City Difference Rank
Medical Provider-Diagnosed Depression 20.1%39,134 20.4%605,899 ▼ -0.3% 9/15
Frequent Mental Distress 19.9%38,761 17.4%516,796 ▲ +2.5% 2/15
Lack of Social/Emotional Support 36.7%71,232 31.2%926,669 ▲ +5.5% 2/15
Loneliness 45.1%87,663 41.3%1,226,648 ▲ +3.8% 2/15
Note: Frequent mental distress means mental health was not good for 14 or more of the past 30 days. Loneliness means feeling lonely sometimes, often, or all the time. Lack of social and emotional support means sometimes, rarely, or never getting the social and emotional support needed.
Universe: Adult population (Age 18+) · Geography: Census Tract · Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release; BRFSS inputs: 2023; modeled estimates; no margin of error


Compare All Districts